DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Transport Scenarios 2050

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Global Transport Scenarios 2050 World Energy Council Project Partners IBM Corporation Paul Scherrer Institute Global Transport Scenarios 2050 Officers of the World Energy Council Global Transport Scenarios 2050 World Energy Council Pierre Gadonneix Chair Copyright © 2011 World Energy Council Abubakar Sambo Vice Chair, Africa All rights reserved. All or part of this publication may be used or Liu Tie’nan reproduced as long as the following citation is included on each Vice Chair, Asia copy or transmission: ‘Used by permission of the World Energy Council, London, www.worldenergy.org’ Arup Roy Choudhury Vice Chair, Asia Pacific & South Asia Published 2011 by: Johannes Teyssen World Energy Council Vice Chair, Europe Regency House 1-4 Warwick Street London W1B 5LT United Kingdom José Antonio Vargas Lleras Vice Chair, Latin America/Caribbean ISBN: 978-0-946121-14-4 Abbas Ali Naqi Vice Chair, Special Responsibility for Middle East & Gulf States Kevin Meyers Vice Chair, North America Heon Cheol Shin Vice Chair, Daegu Congress 2013 Marie-José Nadeau Chair, Communications & Outreach Committee Graham Ward, CBE Chair, Finance Committee Michael Morris Chair, Programme Committee Brian Statham Chair, Studies Committee Christoph Frei Secretary General Global Transport Scenarios 2050 World Energy Council 1 Knowledge Network Members Walter Böhme, Austria Alexandru Sandulescu, Romania Pietro Erber, Brazil Ionut Purica, Romania Renata Szczerbacki, Brazil Alison von Ketelhodt, South Africa Lyudmil Kostadinov, Bulgaria Heloise Nel, South Africa Terry Kimmel, Canada Jaime Gutiérrez, Spain Karim Kassam, Canada Almudena Rosas, Spain Lesme Corredor Martinez, Colombia Gunnar Bengtsson, Sweden José Maboya Nzalingo, Congo (DR) Jochen Kreusel, Switzerland Hans Larsen, Denmark Abdelhamid Khalfallah, Tunisia Georges Bouchard, France Sarper Saragöglu, Turkey Igor Czerny, France Martin Haigh, United Kingdom Alain Le Duigou France Helen El-Mallakh, United States Pierre Sigonney, France Alain Bucaille, France Project Partner – Paul Scherrer Institute Jean Eudes Moncomble , France Simon Vinot, France Philipp Dietrich, Switzerland Enno Harks, Germany Hal Turton, Switzerland Matthias Kirner, Germany Martin Densing, Switzerland Kerstin Mayr, Germany Alexander Stöhr , Germany Christian Hahn, Germany Project Partner – IBM Corporation Ved Mitra, India Anil Bakshi, India Irina Bychkova, United Kingdom Philip Thomas, India Clay Luthy, United States Sundar Iyer, United Kingdom Prakash Sharma, India Antonio De Bellis, Italy Steve Edwards, United Kingdom Davide Moroni, Italy Michael Valocchi, United States Andrea Zara, Italy Federico Caleno, Italy Project Team Kaoru Horie, Japan Junhaeng Jo, Korea (Republic) Christoph Frei, WEC, Secretary General Rodolfo Lacy, Mexico Karl Rose, WEC, Director Policy and Scenarios Pinehas Mutota , Namibia Ayed Al-Qahtani, WEC, Senior Project Manager Barry Blackett, New Zealand Brian Statham, South Africa Eli Bala, Nigeria Suduk Kim, Korea (Republic) Mohammed Bello, Nigeria Gabriela Prata Dias, Portugal Global Transport Scenarios 2050 World Energy Council 2 Global Transport Scenarios 2050 World Energy Council 3 Content Content 3 4.2 Cooperation-Integration 29 Executive Summary 4 5. Transport Scenarios 31 1. Introduction 7 5.1 Freeway 31 1.1 Background 7 5.2 Tollway 32 1.2 Study Goals 7 6. Regional Considerations 34 1.3 Study Approach 8 6.1 Africa and the Middle East 34 2. Overview of Global Transport Sector 9 6.2 Asia 36 3. Driving Forces 12 6.3 Europe and Russia 41 3.1 Economic Growth 12 6.4 North America 43 3.2 Demographic Trends 13 6.5 Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 46 3.3 Urbanization and Megacities 15 7. Modelling and Quantification 49 3.4 Geopolitics 17 7.1 Model Overview 49 3.5 Global Oil Reserve and Supply 18 7.2 Modelling Results 53 3.6 Environmental and Health Concerns 19 7.3 Results for Freeway 53 3.7 Policies and Regulations 19 7.4 Results for Tollway 56 3.8 Lifestyle Changes 21 7.5 Scenario Comparisons on a Global Level 60 3.9 Alternative Fuels 22 8. Conclusions 65 3.10 Fuel Efficiencies 25 Glossary 68 3.11 Innovations 26 Figures and Tables 69 3.12 Summary 28 Appendices 71 4. Critical Uncertainties 29 4.1 Government Regulation 29 Global Transport Scenarios 2050 World Energy Council 4 Executive Summary Over the next four decades, the global transportation Now is the time for strong leadership at both sector will face unprecedented challenges related government and enterprise levels if the transport to demographics, urbanization, pressure to sector is to make a positive contribution towards minimize and dislocate emissions outside urban the well-being of future generations. centres, congestion of aging transport infrastructure and growth in fuel demand. These Regional inputs on transport policies, existing and challenges will all be compounded by uncertainties potential developments in both fuels and emerging from government intervention and technologies, in addition to major driving forces and regulation. Regional and global cooperation, critical uncertainties were all examined and unstable global economic situations, and potential combined into two distinct transport scenarios technological breakthroughs will all have a “Freeway” and “Tollway.” The main difference significant impact. In light of these challenges and between these two scenarios is the degree and the levels of uncertainty, the World Energy Council style of government intervention in regulating future (WEC) decided to re-examine the future of the transport markets. transport and mobility sector by building Global Transport Scenarios to 2050. These scenarios will The “Freeway” scenario envisages a world describe potential developments in transport fuels, where pure market forces prevail to create a technologies, and mobility systems over the course climate for open global competition. of the next forty years. Undoubtedly, the evolution of the transport world between 2010 and 2050 will The “Tollway” scenario describes a more offer many challenges, the biggest of which is regulated world where governments decide to providing sustainable transport for the seven to intervene in markets to promote technology nine billion people at the lowest social cost solutions and infrastructure development that possible. These scenarios show that government put common interests at the forefront. policies will play a critical role in determining the most likely pathway into the future. The Freeway and Tollway scenarios describe the extreme ends of the potential futures envelope. The World Energy Council believes that The reality will inevitably be between these two constructive dialogue between national and local scenarios with regional differences playing a major policy makers, manufacturers, consumers and role. producers will be essential if we are to meet these challenges. Only with discovery, promotion and In quantifying these two scenarios, we noted that development of new energy resources, matched to by 2050: innovation and improvements in current technologies, catalysed by optimally formulated Total fuel demand in all transport modes will policies can we hope to ensure a more sustainable increase by 30% (Tollway) to 82% (Freeway) transport future for current and future generations. above the 2010 levels. The growth in fuel Global Transport Scenarios 2050 World Energy Council 5 demand will be driven mainly by trucks, The total number of cars in the world is also buses, trains, ships, and airplanes. expected to increase 2.2 times (Tollway) to 2.6 times (Freeway), mainly in the developing Transport sector fuel mix will still depend world, where the number of cars will increase heavily on gasoline, diesel, fuel oil and jet by 430% (Tollway) to 557% (Freeway) while fuel, as they all will still constitute the bulk of the developed countries will see an increase transport market fuels with 80% (Tollway) to of only 36% (Tollway) to 41% (Freeway). 88% (Freeway) in 2050. At the end of the scenario period (2050) we Demand for these major fuels will increase expect conventional gasoline and diesel by 10% (Tollway) to 68% (Freeway) over the internal combustion engines (ICEs) to have a scenario period. market share between 26% (Tollway) and 78% (Freeway). Other drive-train technologies Demand for diesel and fuel oil will grow by will make up the rest with liquid hybrid, plug- 46% (Tollway) to 200% (Freeway). ins, and electric vehicles leading in Tollway, while liquid hybrids, plug-ins and gas vehicles Demand for jet fuel will grow by 200% lead in Freeway. (Tollway) to 300% (Freeway). The scenarios also show significant regional Demand for gasoline is expected to drop by differences, with shale gas being a driver for 16% (Freeway) to 63% (Tollway). natural gas fuelled transport in North America, biofuels with a continued high contribution in Latin Biofuels will also help to satisfy the demand for America, and electric mobility having a particularly transport fuel as their use will increase almost four strong push in Asia/China where the growth of fold in both scenarios. Other fuels including megacities is most dramatic. electricity, hydrogen, and natural gas will increase six to seven fold. In 2010, the CO2 emissions from the transport sector were about 23% of global CO2 emission The additional transport fuel demand will come levels and emissions from cars were about 41% of from the developing countries (especially China total transport emissions. With the higher levels of and India) where demand will grow by 200% transport demand, and depending on the fuel mix: (Tollway)
Recommended publications
  • Toronto Urban Sharing Team

    Toronto Urban Sharing Team

    URBAN SHARING City report no 2 in TORONTO URBAN SHARING TEAM URBAN SHARING IN TORONTO City report no. 2 URBAN SHARING TEAM: Oksana Mont, Andrius Plepys, Yuliya Voytenko Palgan, Jagdeep Singh, Matthias Lehner, Steven Curtis, Lucie Zvolska, and Ana Maria Arbelaez Velez 2020 Cover design: Lucie Zvolska Cover photo: Oksana Mont Copyright: URBAN SHARING TEAM ISBN: 978-91-87357-62-6. Print Urban Sharing in Toronto, City report no.2 ISBN: 978-91-87357-63-3. Pdf Urban Sharing in Toronto, City report no. 2 Printed in Sweden by E-print, Stockholm 2020 Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 2 THE CITY CONTEXT ................................................................................. 5 2.1 Geography and demographics ................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Topography and urban sprawl .................................................. 5 2.1.2 Socio-demographics.................................................................. 6 2.1.3 Tourism ..................................................................................... 6 2.2 City governance ....................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Governance structure ................................................................ 6 2.2.2 City regulatory policies for sharing ............................................ 8 2.3 Economy ................................................................................................ 11 2.3.1
  • L'écho-Mobile

    L'écho-Mobile

    L’écho -mobile COMMUNAUTo’s newsletter · APRIL 2011 · VOL. XVII, NO 1 Communatuo’s first incursion in an out-of-province market (page 6 ) In this issue/ And more/ Editorial (page 2 ) CarShare HFX Halifax (page 6 ) The Competition Is Not What It Seems Communauto becomes a shareholder Improved agreements (page 4 ) BIXI-AUTO and BIXI-AUTO-BUS (page 6 ) The network reservation is better than ever The DUO and the TRIO are exclusively back for this summer Long distance rates (page 4 ) Caisse d’économie solidaire (page 3 ) Easier access and other improvements A $500 loan to switch to a member subscription and more / > EDITORIAL The Competition Is Not What It Seems Daimler’s car2go, BMW’s premium carsharing Edinburgh, Scotland (a more motivated local service, the upcoming Volkswagen project in firm saved the project at the last minute.) In Hanover and Renault-Nissan’s New Mobility 2008, Honda withdrew from the Singapore Concept, are radically changing the car market after six years, its efforts deemed industry. unsuccessful, despite praise from the critics and the community’s disappointment (And The arrival of the automobile industry’s major yet how difficult would it be for such a large players on the “mobility-on-demand” market company to manage a fleet of just under 100 will hopefully accelerate the concept’s large- vehicles?). scale development over the next few years. Benoît Robert It is sometimes disconcerting that, para- Chief Executive Officer It may seem surprising at first that manu- doxically, companies with the most resources Communauto facturers are investing in the carsharing lack perseverance when it comes to industry, given that it helps reduce household innovation.
  • Télécharger La Synthèse De L'enquête Nationale Sur L'autopartage 2019

    Télécharger La Synthèse De L'enquête Nationale Sur L'autopartage 2019

    Enquête nationale sur l’autopartage - Edition 2019 Actualisation et étude de l’impact des services d’autopartage sur l’équipement des ménages et sur les kilomètres parcourus en voiture UNE ÉTUDE RÉALISÉE PAR 6T-BUREAU DE RECHERCHE SUR UN COFINANCEMENT 6T ET ADEME Contexte Enjeux Publiées en 2012 et 2016, les deux premières Tout comme en 2012 et 2016, l’édition 2019 porte éditions de l’Enquête Nationale sur l’Autopartage1 principalement sur l’autopartage en boucle. Elle vise constituaient les premières études d’envergure sur deux objectifs : les usagers, usages et impacts de l’autopartage en France. mettre à jour les résultats de la précédente édition : les usagers, usages et impacts de l’autopartage ont- Menées auprès d’au moins 2 000 usagers abonnés ils évolué entre 2016 et 2019 ? d’une vingtaine de services d’autopartage différents, ces enquêtes ont mis en évidence l’effet « déclencheur affiner la compréhension des usagers, usages et de multimodalité » de l’autopartage en boucle : impacts de l’autopartage : notamment, qui sont les l’autopartage permet aux habitants des villes de usagers de l’autopartage ? Une fois abonnés à s’affranchir de la voiture individuelle, de découvrir l’autopartage, leurs pratiques de déplacements et de s’approprier d’autres modes de déplacement. évoluent-elles de la même manière ? Quels sont les usages et les impacts de l’autopartage entre Trois ans après la dernière enquête, l’autopartage particuliers et de l’autopartage en contexte joue-t-il encore le même rôle dans la mobilité professionnel ? urbaine ? Ses usagers sont-ils restés les mêmes ? Ses usages, ses impacts ont-ils évolué ? Le rapport d’étude complet est disponible sur notre blog : Lien Autopartage B2C en boucle : (fr Autopartage B2C en trace Autopartage entre l’objet principal de l’étude directe particuliers ou P2P Le véhicule est rendu dans la Avec stations : le véhicule peut Réalisée entre particuliers station de départ.
  • Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models

    Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models

    Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models Susan A. Shaheen1 and Nelson D. Chan2 Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Carsharing continues to grow worldwide as a powerful strategy to provide an alternative to solo driving. The viability of electric vehicles, or EVs, has been examined in various carsharing business models. Moreover, new technologies have given rise to electromobility, or e-mobility, systems. This paper discusses the evolution of e-mobility in carsharing business models and the challenges and opportunities that EVs present to carsharing operators around the world. Operators are now anticipating increased EV proliferation into vehicle fleets over the next 5- 10 years as technology, infrastructure, and public policy shift toward support of e- mobility systems. Thus, research is still needed to quantify impacts of EVs in changing travel behavior toward more sustainable transport. 1 Introduction Carsharing enables a group of members to share a vehicle fleet that is maintained, managed, and insured by a third-party organization. Primarily used for short-term trips, carsharing can provide affordable, self-service vehicle access 24-h per day for those who do not have a car, want to reduce the number of vehicles in their household, or do not use their vehicle during the day for long periods of time. Rates include fuel, insurance, and maintenance. Ideally, carsharing works best in a neighborhood, business, or campus setting where users could walk, bike, share rides, or take public transit to access the shared-use vehicles. Carsharing has evolved through several phases since the first carsharing system began in Europe in 1948.
  • Sharing and Tourism: the Rise of New Markets in Transport

    Sharing and Tourism: the Rise of New Markets in Transport

    SHARING AND TOURISM: THE RISE OF NEW MARKEts IN TRANSPORT Documents de travail GREDEG GREDEG Working Papers Series Christian Longhi Marcello M. Mariani Sylvie Rochhia GREDEG WP No. 2016-01 http://www.gredeg.cnrs.fr/working-papers.html Les opinions exprimées dans la série des Documents de travail GREDEG sont celles des auteurs et ne reflèlent pas nécessairement celles de l’institution. Les documents n’ont pas été soumis à un rapport formel et sont donc inclus dans cette série pour obtenir des commentaires et encourager la discussion. Les droits sur les documents appartiennent aux auteurs. The views expressed in the GREDEG Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the institution. The Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Sharing and Tourism: The Rise of New Markets in Transport Christian Longhi1, Marcello M. Mariani2 and Sylvie Rochhia1 1University Nice Sophia Antipolis, GREDEG, CNRS, 250 rue A. Einstein, 06560 Valbonne France [email protected], [email protected] 2University of Bologna, Via Capo di Lucca, 34 – 40126, Bologna, Italy [email protected] GREDEG Working Paper No. 2016-01 Abstract. This paper analyses the implications of sharing on tourists and tourism focusing on the transportation sector. The shifts from ownership to access, from products to services have induced dramatic changes triggered by the emergence of innovative marketplaces. The services offered by Knowledge Innovative Service Suppliers, start-ups at the origin of innovative marketplaces run through platforms allow the tourists to find solutions to run themselves their activities, bypassing the traditional tourism industry.
  • Cusecar – Community Car-Sharing Program: Car Sharing Lessons Learned

    Cusecar – Community Car-Sharing Program: Car Sharing Lessons Learned

    CuseCar – Community Car-Sharing Program: Car Sharing Lessons Learned The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Joseph D. Tario Project Manager and New York State Department of Transportation Robert Ancar Project Manager Prepared by Sarah Stephens Director of Business Development and Public Relations CuseCar of Syracuse Syracuse, NY August 2011 1 1. Report No. C-08-26 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date CuseCar – Community Car-Sharing Program: Car Sharing Lessons Learned August 2011 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) Sarah Stephens 8. Performing Organization Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. 11. Contract or Grant No CuseCar of Syracuse, 360 Erie Blvd. East, Syracuse, NY 13202 Contract No. 11103 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered NYSERDA, 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY 12203 Final Report (2008 – 2011) NYS DOT, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12232 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Project funded in part with funds from the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract CuseCar of Syracuse launched services in December 2008 with 3 Toyota Prius Hybrids. CuseCar initially, due to concerns about availability, limited membership to Origination Sponsor Locations, which in turn developed few members. In 2009 CuseCar opened to the general public and has seen a small growth in membership and usage. CuseCar to date has close to 100 members. CuseCar has vehicles centralized in the City of Syracuse Downtown area, with 4 vehicles located within a few city blocks of one another.
  • A Collaborative Design Process to Support Sustainable

    A Collaborative Design Process to Support Sustainable

    SCENARIODEVELOPMENTINPRODUCTSERVICESYSTEMS: ACOLLABORATIVEDESIGNPROCESSTOSUPPORT SUSTAINABLECONSUMPTION CatharinaB.Nawangpalupi Athesissubmittedforthedegreeof DoctorofPhilosophy FACULTYOFTHEBUILTENVIRONMENT THEUNIVERSITYOFNEWSOUTHWALES COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ‘I hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350 word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstract International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only). I have either used no substantial portions of copyright material in my thesis or I have obtained permission to use copyright material; where permission has not been granted I have applied/will apply for a partial restriction of the digital copy of my thesis or dissertation.' Signed Date 2 August 2010 AUTHENTICITY STATEMENT ‘I certify that the Library deposit digital copy is a direct equivalent of the final officially approved version of my thesis. No emendation of content has occurred and if there are any minor variations in formatting, they are the result of the conversion to digital format.’ Signed Date 2 August 2010 i ORIGINALITY STATEMENT ‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis.
  • Benchmarking of Existing Business / Operating Models & Best Practices

    Benchmarking of Existing Business / Operating Models & Best Practices

    SHared automation Operating models for Worldwide adoption SHOW Grant Agreement Number: 875530 D2.1.: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices This report is part of a project that has received funding by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement number 875530 Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above-referenced consortium members shall have no liability to third parties for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. © 2020 by SHOW Consortium. This report is subject to a disclaimer and copyright. This report has been carried out under a contract awarded by the European Commission, contract number: 875530. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the SHOW project. D2.1: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices 2 Executive Summary D2.1 provides the state-of-the-art for business and operating roles in the field of mobility services (MaaS, LaaS and DRT containing the mobility services canvas as description of the selected representative mobility services, the business and operating models describing relevant business factors and operation environment, the user and role analysis representing the involved user and roles for the mobility services (providing, operating and using the service) as well as identifying the success and failure models of the analysed mobility services and finally a KPI-Analysis (business- driven) to give a structured economical evaluation as base for the benchmarking.
  • World Intellectual Property Report 2019

    World Intellectual Property Report 2019

    Chapter 2 Global networks of innovation hotspots For much of the 20th century, multinational Starting in the 1980s and 1990s, the situation changed. companies (MNCs) from high-income countries The creation of new scientific and technological knowl­ restricted their foreign-based research and edge increasingly required interaction between insti­ development (R&D) operations to other rich tutions and organizations, whether public or private, economies, notably the U.S., Western European national or multinational, irrespective of their location. countries and, later, Japan. This was in marked Gradually, China, India, Eastern Europe and other contrast to the trend in manufacturing activities, middle­income economies gained in importance both which saw increasing outsourcing from richer to as targets for R&D­oriented foreign direct invest­ middle-income and developing economies.1 ment (FDI) by multinational firms and as sources of new knowledge. The rising need for complex and specialized knowledge and technological interaction at both national and international level has resulted – paradoxically – in both geographical concentration and dispersion of innova­ tion creation, as highlighted in Chapter 1. On the one hand, organizations have sought to locate innovation activities and interactions wherever high quality and lower costs are available. On the other, market forces, economies of scale and the need for more face­to­ face communication and multidisciplinary interaction, because of the complexity of the interactions, have pulled in the direction of geographical proximity. Global innovation networks have been a key centrifugal force in the geographical distribution of knowledge­ creation activities. Knowledge­seeking FDI does not target whole countries, but specific locations within them.
  • Live Well, Live Green

    Live Well, Live Green

    Live Well, Live Green NOTICE: You Do NOT Have the Right to Reprint or Resell this Report! You Also MAY NOT Give Away, Sell or Share the Content Herein © Copyright. All rights reserved. Clare Delaney Page 2 Live Well, Live Green Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 6 The Purpose of This Book ........................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter 1: Banish the Toxins! ................................................................................................................. 8 7 Home Health Products You Don’t Need ....................................................................................... 8 Household Products to Avoid........................................................................................................ 10 Heavenly Aromas! ......................................................................................................................... 13 Mosquitoes ................................................................................................................................... 14 Eco-friendly Eye Care .................................................................................................................... 18 Allergies ......................................................................................................................................... 20 Wonderful Lemons! .....................................................................................................................
  • Carsharing and Partnership Management an International Perspective

    Carsharing and Partnership Management an International Perspective

    118 Paper No. 99-0826 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1666 Carsharing and Partnership Management An International Perspective SUSAN SHAHEEN, DANIEL SPERLING, AND CONRAD WAGNER Most cars carry one person and are used for less than 1 hour per day. A tied to actual vehicle usage. A carsharing system in effect transforms more economically rational approach would be to use vehicles more the fixed costs of vehicle ownership into variable costs. intensively. Carsharing, in which a group of people pays a subscription Carsharing is most effective and attractive when seen as a trans- plus a per-use fee, is one means of doing so. Carsharing may be orga- portation mode that fills the gap between transit and private cars and nized through affinity groups, large employers, transit operators, neigh- borhood groups, or large carsharing businesses. Relative to car owner- that can be linked to other modes and transportation services. For ship, carsharing has the disadvantage of less convenient vehicle access long distances, one may use a household vehicle, air transport, rail, but the advantages of a large range of vehicles, fewer ownership respon- bus, or a rental car; and for short distances, one might walk, bicycle, sibilities, and less cost (if vehicles are not used intensively). The uncou- or use a taxi. But for intermediate travel activities, even routine ones, pling of car ownership and use offers the potential for altering vehicle one might use a shared vehicle. The shared-car option provides other usage and directing individuals toward other mobility options. The per- customer attractions: it can serve as mobility insurance in emergen- ceived convenience (e.g., preferred parking) and cost savings of car- cies and as a means of satisfying occasional vehicle needs and sharing have promoted a new modal split for many carsharing partici- pants throughout the world.
  • The Future of Car Ownership August 2017 About the NRMA

    The Future of Car Ownership August 2017 About the NRMA

    Future mobility series The future of car ownership August 2017 About the NRMA Better road and transport infrastructure has been a core focus of the NRMA since 1920 when our founders lobbied for improvements to the condition of Parramatta Road in Sydney. Independent advocacy was our foundation activity, and it remains critical to who we are as we approach our first centenary. We’ve grown to represent over 2.4 million Australians, principally from New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. We provide motoring, mobility and tourism services to our Members and the community. Today, we work with policy makers and industry leaders, advocating for increased investment in road infrastructure and transport solutions to make mobility safer, provide access for all, and deliver sustainable communities. By working together with all levels of government to deliver integrated transport options, we give motorists real choice about how they get around. We firmly believe that integrated transport networks, including efficient roads, high-quality public transport and improved facilities for cyclists and pedestrians, are essential in addressing the challenge of growing congestion and providing for the future growth of our communities. The NRMA acknowledges the work of Sam Rutherford on this report. Comments and queries Ms Carlita Warren Senior Manager – Public Policy and Research NRMA PO Box 1026, Strathfield NSW 2135 Email: [email protected] Web: mynrma.com.au Cover Image: nadla – Getty Images Contents Executive summary 2 Challenges