DOCSLIB.ORG

Inventory Report on the State of the Art of Relevant Public Institutions, Vulnerable/Marginalized Groups and UPA in Pilot Areas FINAL VERSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inventory Report on the State of the Art of Relevant Public Institutions, Vulnerable/Marginalized Groups and UPA in Pilot Areas FINAL VERSION Urban agriculture for changing cities: governance models for better institutional capacities and social inclusion Inventory report on the state of the art of relevant public institutions, vulnerable/marginalized groups and UPA in pilot areas FINAL VERSION Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute Ljubljana, July 2017 1 DELIVERABLE SUMMARY PROJECT INFORMATION Project acronym: AgriGo4Cities Project title: Urban agriculture for changing cities: governance models for better institutional capacities and social inclusion Contract number: DTP1-533-4.1 Starting date: 1. 1. 2017 Ending date: 30. 6. 2017 Project website address: http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved- projects/agrigo4cities Lead partner organisation: Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute Name of representative: Prof. Dr. Oto Luthar Project manager: Dr. Jani Kozina E-mail: [email protected] Telephone number: +386 (0)1 200 27 14 DELIVERABLE INFORMATION Title of the deliverable: Inventory report on the state of the art of relevant public institutions, vulnerable/marginalized groups and UPA in pilot areas Number of the deliverable D 3.1.2 WP / activity related to the deliverable: WP3 / Activity 3.1: Identification of good practices of participatory UPA Type (internal or restricted or public): public WP leader: PiNA Activity leader: ZRC SAZU Participating partner(s): all partners Authors: Dr. Jani Kozina, Dr. Jernej Tiran, Dr. Saša Poljak Istenič, Peter Repolusk, Jakob Ercegović, Klemen Krušec E-mail: [email protected] Telephone number: +386 (0)1 200 27 14 DELIVERY DEADLINES Date of the delivery to the JS: 21. 8. 2017 1 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of pilot areas .............................................................. 7 2.1 Demographical development (NUTS 3) .............................................................................................. 8 2.2 Activity status and educational attainment (NUTS 2) ...................................................................... 15 2.3 Unemployment (NUTS 2) .................................................................................................................. 17 2.4 Social exclusion and poverty (NUTS 2) ............................................................................................. 18 2.5 Young people in education and employment (NUTS 2) ................................................................... 22 3 Land cover in pilot areas .......................................................................................................................... 25 4 State of the art of urban agriculture, participatory planning, social inclusion and sustainable urban development in pilot areas ......................................................................................................................... 36 4.1 Characteristics of urban agriculture ................................................................................................. 36 4.1.1 Local strategic and legislative framework regarding urban agriculture .................................... 39 4.1.2 Structure of urban agriculture in pilot areas ............................................................................. 40 4.1.3 Potential new locations for urban agriculture in pilot areas ..................................................... 47 4.2 Participatory planning & management of urban agriculture ........................................................... 50 4.2.1 Community involvement in strategic planning ......................................................................... 51 4.2.2 Community involvement in neighbourhood planning .............................................................. 52 4.2.3 Community involvement in management of urban agricultural land ....................................... 52 4.2.4 Initiation of decision-making processes .................................................................................... 53 4.2.5 Current experience regarding participatory approaches .......................................................... 53 4.3 Social inclusion through urban agriculture ....................................................................................... 54 4.3.1 Identification of vulnerable groups ........................................................................................... 55 4.3.2 Mechanisms for social inclusion of vulnerable groups in surveyed municipality ..................... 57 4.3.3 Good practices of social inclusion of vulnerable groups in surveyed municipalities ................ 62 4.4 Contribution of urban agriculture to sustainable urban development ............................................ 63 4.4.1 Local strategic and legislative framework ................................................................................. 64 4.4.2 Economic aspects ...................................................................................................................... 65 4.4.3 Social aspects ............................................................................................................................. 66 4.4.4 Environmental aspect ................................................................................................................ 68 2 4.4.5 Cultural aspect ........................................................................................................................... 68 5 Partners’ profiles ..................................................................................................................................... 69 5.1 Municipal district Prague 9 (Czech Republic) ................................................................................... 69 5.1.1 Characteristics of urban agriculture .......................................................................................... 69 5.1.2 Participatory planning & management of urban agriculture .................................................... 72 5.1.3 Social inclusion through urban agriculture ................................................................................ 73 5.1.4 Contribution of urban agriculture to sustainable urban development ..................................... 75 5.2 Municipality of Blagoevgrad (Bulgaria) ............................................................................................ 76 5.2.1 Characteristics of urban agriculture .......................................................................................... 76 5.2.2 Participatory planning & management of urban agriculture .................................................... 83 5.2.3 Social inclusion through urban agriculture ................................................................................ 84 5.2.4 Contribution of urban agriculture to sustainable urban development ..................................... 86 5.3 Municipality of Székesfehérvár (Hungary) ....................................................................................... 87 5.3.1 Characteristics of urban agriculture .......................................................................................... 87 5.3.2 Participatory planning & management of urban agriculture .................................................... 93 5.3.3 Social inclusion through urban agriculture ................................................................................ 93 5.3.4 Contribution of urban agriculture to sustainable urban development ..................................... 96 5.4 Municipality of Vaslui (Romania) ...................................................................................................... 97 5.4.1 Characteristics of urban agriculture .......................................................................................... 97 5.4.2 Participatory planning & management of urban agriculture .................................................. 100 5.4.3 Social inclusion through urban agriculture .............................................................................. 100 5.4.4 Contribution of urban agriculture to sustainable urban development ................................... 103 5.5 Municipality of Velenje (Slovenia) .................................................................................................. 104 5.5.1 Characteristics of urban agriculture ........................................................................................ 104 5.5.2 Participatory planning & management of urban agriculture .................................................. 114 5.5.3 Social inclusion through urban agriculture .............................................................................. 114 5.5.4 Contribution of urban agriculture to sustainable urban development ................................... 117 5.6 Municipality of Ulcinj (Montenegro) .............................................................................................. 118 5.6.1 Characteristics of urban agriculture ........................................................................................ 119 5.6.2 Participatory planning & management of urban agriculture .................................................. 119 3 5.6.3 Social inclusion through urban agriculture .............................................................................. 119 5.6.4 Contribution
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Montenegro Old and New: History, Politics, Culture, and the People
    60 ZuZana Poláčková; Pieter van Duin Montenegro Old and New: History, Politics, Culture, and the People The authors are focusing on how Montenegro today is coming to terms with the task of becoming a modern European nation, which implies recognition not only of democracy, the rule of law, and so forth, but also of a degree of ‘multiculturalism’, that is recognition of the existence of cultural, ethnic, linguistic and religious minorities in a society that is dominated by a Slavic Orthodox majority. In his context they are analyzing the history of the struggle of the Montenegrin people against a host of foreign invaders – after they had ceased to be invaders themselves – and especially their apparently consistent refusal to accept Ottoman sovereignty over their homeland seemed to make them the most remarkable freedom fighters imaginable and led to the creation of a special Montenegrin image in Europe. This im- age of heroic stubbornness and unique martial bravery was even consciously cultivated in Western and Central Europe from the early nineteenth century onwards, as the Greeks, the Serbs, the Montenegrins and other Balkan peoples began to resist the Ottoman Empire in a more effective way and the force of Romantic nationalism began to influence the whole of Europe, from German historians to British politi- cians, and also including Montenegrin and Serbian poets themselves. And what about the present situa- tion? The authors of this essay carried out an improvised piece of investigation into current conditions, attitudes, and feelings on both the Albanian and the Slavic-Montenegrin side (in September 2012). key words: Montenegro; history; multiculturalism; identity; nationalism; Muslim; Orthodox Montenegro (Crna Gora, Tsrna Gora, Tsernagora) is a small country in the Western Balkans region with some 625,000 inhabitants,1 which became an independent nation in 2006 and a can- didate-member of the EU in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Natural Values of the Privately Owned Nature Park “Solana Ulcinj”, Montenegro
    5 Management Plan for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Natural Values of the Privately Owned Nature Park “Solana Ulcinj”, Montenegro Landesmuseum Joanneum Zoologie Borut STUMBERGER, Peter SACKL, Darko SAVELJI, Martin SCHNEIDER-JACOBY Management Plan for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Natural Values of the Privately Owned Nature Park “Solana Ulcinj”, Montenegro March 2007 Reprinted from: Joannea-Zoologie 10, 2008 Published by EuroNatur – Stiftung Europäisches Naturerbe Steiermärkisches Landesmuseum Joanneum – Zoologie with support by the MAVA Foundation Graz, December 2008 Selbstverlag Landesmuseum Joanneum, Zoologie, 8010 Graz, Raubergasse 10. Druck und Endfertigung: Druckerei Khil, Graz. Graz, 2008 Photos front cover: Greater Flamingo (M. Tiefenbach), Dalmatian Pelican (L. Khil), European Bee-eater (P. Sackl) and Solana Ulcinj, Jezero 2 (M. Schneider-Jacoby). Joannea Zool. 10: 5–84 (2008) Management plan for the conservation and sustainable use of the natural values of the privately owned Nature Park «Solana Ulcinj», Montenegro1 March 2007 Borut STUMBERGER, Peter SACKL, Darko SAVELJI and Martin SCHNEIDER-JACOBY Contents Abstract .................................................................................................... 7 Sažetak ..................................................................................................... 8 Abstrakt .................................................................................................... 9 Zusammenfassung ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Economic Changes in Blagoevgrad in Connection with the Integration of Bulgaria’S to Eu
    Discussion Papers 2007. Regionality and/or Locality 169-177. p. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGES IN BLAGOEVGRAD IN CONNECTION WITH THE INTEGRATION OF BULGARIA’S TO EU ALEKSANDRA RAVNACHKA This research aims to demonstrate, analyze and assess the socio-economic changes in Blagoevgrad municipality in connection with Bulgaria's integration to the EU. The municipality of Blagoevgrad is located in Southwest Bulgaria and occupies an area of 628 km2. According to the regional scheme of the country, the munici- pality includes the town of Blagoevgrad and its adjacent 25 villages. The town of Blagoevgrad is situated of 100 km south of the capital city of Sofia and proximity by the Republic Macedonia and Greece. The geographical location of the munici- pality favours its development. The demographic factors have a considerable im- pact on the development of Blagoevgrad municipality. Until 1998 its population was growing but since then it has been slowly decreasing. During 1992–2001 the average annual population drop was by -0.05%. The main causes for this decline are a low birth rate, high death rate, migration, etc. In 2005 the inhabitants of the municipality were 77,183 (data source: GRAO) which constituted 23.2% of the district's population and 1.0% of the country's population (Table 1, Figure 1). Most of the municipality’s population lives in the town of Blagoevgrad. The share of urban population in the municipality is 91.2% and has the rural population – 8.7%. For comparison sake the ratio urban: rural population in the whole district is 57.2%: 42.8%.
    [Show full text]
  • Models of Architecture from the Middle Ages to Present on the Valley of Struma River
    MODELS OF ARCHITECTURE FROM THE MIDDLE AGES TO PRESENT ON THE VALLEY OF STRUMA RIVER Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria Brestovo Monastery “St. Archangel Michael”, Municipality of Simitly, Bulgaria Pirin village, Bulgaria Melnik, Bulgaria Serres, Greece Blagoevgrad is the largest city in Southwest Bulgaria, the administrative center of Blagoevgrad District and Blagoevgrad Municipality. It is situated at the foot of the southwestern slopes of the Rila Mountain, in the valley of the Struma River, 100 km south from the capital Sofia. The city is located on the two banks of the Bistritsa river, just before its inflow into the Struma River. Besides the clear waters of the river, important factors for the development of the city were the mineral springs and the favorable central location of the city, situated between Sofia and Thessaloniki, Kyustendil and Razlog. About 35 km away from the city, in the upper course of the Bistritsa River, is located the ancient Parangalitsa forest - one of the most valuable reserves in Bulgaria. In 1973, it was proclaimed by UNESCO as a Biosphere Reserve. The history of Blagoevgrad dates back to 10th century BC. The Thracian settlement Skaptopara (Upper Market) was founded around the mineral springs around 300 BC. This settlement has been associated with the Thracian tribe Denteleti who inhabited the upper valley of the Struma River. In the 1st century AD the Thracians were conquered by the Romans. A Roman settlement from 3rd-5th century has been discovered in 2017, near the village of Pokrovnik, about 3 km from Blagoevgrad. The establishment’s location did coincide with the planned route of Struma highway and it has been destroyed, with only a few of the excavated buildings being moved away from the road.
    [Show full text]
  • Europa Per I Cittadini
    Europa per i cittadini The project « POWER- EUROPEAN NETWORK OF WOMAN MAYORS FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES IN CITIZENS LIFE» was funded with the support of the European Union under the Programme "Europe for Citizens" Applicable to the Strand 2 – Measure 2.2 "Networks of Towns" 6 events have been carried out within this project: Event 1 Participation: The event involved 126 citizens, including: - 6 participants from the city of Ciudad Real (Spain), - 4 participants from the city of Blagoevgrad (Bulgaria), - 4 participants from the city of Labin (Croatia), - 4 participants from the city of Tetovo (Macedonia), - 1 participant from the city of Vilnius (Lithuania), - 1 participant from the city of Wien (Austria), - 3 participants from the city of Pittsburgh (USA), - 5 participants from the city of Buenos Aires (Argentina), - 5 participants from the city of Hamburg (Germany), - 1 participant from the city of Rotterdam (Netherlands), - 2 participants from the city of Liverpool (UK), - 1 participant from the city of Uppsala (Sweden), - 1 participant from the city of San Marino (Republic of San Marino), - 88 participants from the cities of Pollina, Montagnareale, Castelbuono, Sinagra, Vita, Geraci Siculo, Rimini (Italy). Location / Dates: The event took place in Pollina (Italy), from 4/12/2014 to 6/12/2014 Short description: The first day of meeting (December 4th 2014) started with the welcome of the Mayor of Pollina, Mrs Magda Culotta, to the public audience and to the European delegations from partner organizations Municipality of Tetovo (Macedonia), Municipality of Ciudad Real (Spain), Municipality of Labin (Croatia) and the Association South Western Municipalities (Bulgaria). They presented their Municipalities with a particular focus about gender policies realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity Building for E-Learning in Tourism
    Izgradnja kapaciteta elektronskog učenja u sektoru turizma u prekograničnom regionu CB007.2.13.085 CAPACITY BUILDING FOR E-LEARNING IN TOURISM This document has been produced with the assistance of the European Union through the Interreg- IPA CBC Bulgaria-Serbia Program, CCI No. 2014TC16I5CB007. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Pravi korak Association and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union or the Managing Authority of the Program. Izgradnja kapaciteta elektronskog učenja u sektoru turizma u prekograničnom region, CB007.2.13.085 The document is elaborated in the framework of the project “E-learning capacity building in the tourist sector in cross-border region”, CB007.2.13.085, on the base of service contract: E-LEARNING CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAMME IN TOURIST SECTOR AT THE TARGET CROSS-BORDER REGION Reference number: CB007.2.13.085-TD2 Lead partner: Association Pravi korak, Niš, Serbia Project partner 2: Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Kyustendil, Kyustendil, Bulgaria Foreword The rapid expansion of tourism has so far gone much faster than its scientific comprehension, not only on our own but also on a global scale. This is reasonable if, in addition to dynamic development, the number and diversity of components that create the tourism complex are taken into account, resulting in very complex relationships within it. This is also the reason why the number of fundamental and complex works and textbooks on that matter is still very limited. In addition, insufficient processing of tourism as a complex phenomenon creates serious difficulties in resolving the relations and problems that have arisen, especially those that are a reflection of the lack of professional tourist staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Bratimljenjebratimljenje
    1 2 BRATIMLJENJEBRATIMLJENJE 3 Zahvaljujući ubrzanom razvoju moderne informacione i komunikacione tehnologije, svijet se sve češće opisuje kao „Globalno selo“. Globalizacija i evropska integracija podrazumijevaju svijet u kojem je sve veća povezanost i međuzavisnost, i u kojem se takmičimo i sarađujemo jedni sa drugima. U ovakvom okruženju koje se brzo mijenja, lokalna vlast mora da odigra ključnu ulogu u aktivnom radu sa evropskim i međunarodnim partnerima. Formalne veze i partnerstva pobratimljenih gradova i opština, zasnovane na zajedničkoj izgradnji institucionalnih kapaciteta i razmjeni iskustava, ne samo da pomažu u prevazilaženju kulturnih barijera, već im i obezbjeđuju mogućnost da uče jedni od drugih. Danas su naše lokalne vlasti uspostavile mrežu i spone partnerstva, koji predstavljaju novi oblik međunarodne saradnje. Polazeći od formalnog bratimljenja gradova, do tehničke pomoći i partnerstva, koji se baziraju na realizaciji projekata, a sve u cilju stvaranja kapaciteta - sve ove spone pružaju nam mogućnost da razmjenimo iskustva i da učimo jedni od drugih, da pronalazimo efikasna rešenja za ozbiljne probleme i da stremimo ka stabilnosti i miru. Uz to, želja Crne Gore da postane članica Evropske unije podrazumijeva poštovanje drugih naroda i kultura i predstavljanje crnogorskog načina života i kulture drugima. Za postizanje toga cilja teško da postoji direktniji način od bratimljenja gradova. Zajednica opština Crne Gore je, uz podršku OEBS-a, pripremila ovu publikaciju u želji da podstakne bratimljenje crnogorskih lokalnih samouprava sa gradovima Evrope i svijeta. Ovom publikacijom su predstavljene naše lokalne samouprave sa kratkim prikazom svojih specifičnosti, istorijskih osobenosti i bogatstvom kulturnog nasledja sa ciljem da se povežemo sa većim brojem gradova i opština i ostvarimo jak osjećaj prijateljstva i zajedničkog evropskog indetiteta.
    [Show full text]
  • 9.2 Housing Market
    Public Disclosure Authorized BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Housing Sector Assessment F i n a l R e p o r t Prepared for Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works Public Disclosure Authorized By The World Bank June2017 HOUSING IN BULGARIA Organization of the Document To facilitate ease of reading – given the length and complexity of the full report – this document includes the following: - A 5-page Executive Summary, which highlights the key messages; - A 20-page Short Report, which presents in some level of detail the analysis, together with the main conclusions and recommendations; - A 150-page Main Report, which includes the full Situation Analysis, followed by Findings and Recommendations in detail. i HOUSING IN BULGARIA Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations IV Currency Equivalents VI Acknowledgements VII Executive Summary 1 Short Report 6 Main Report 27 SITUATION ANALYSIS 29 INTRODUCTION 31 1.1 Context 31 1.2 Relevance to the CPF and other World Bank projects 33 HOUSING AND URBANIZATION 35 2.1 Population Trends 35 2.2 Emigration 35 2.3 City typologies and trends 38 HOUSING STOCK AND QUALITY 41 3.1 Housing Stock 41 3.2 Ownership and Tenure 46 3.3 Housing Quality 50 PROGRAMS, INSTITUTIONS, LAWS, AND PROCEDURES 56 4.1 Current Approach to Housing 56 4.2 EU- and State-Funded Programs in the Housing Sector 56 4.3 Other State support for housing 61 4.4 Public Sector Stakeholders 69 4.5 Legal Framework 71 i HOUSING IN BULGARIA 4.6 Relevant Legislation and Processes for Housing 80 LOWER INCOME AND
    [Show full text]
  • Example of Good Practice Increase Revenues for the Local Population
    Example of good practice Increase revenues for the local population through sustainable tourist at Šasko Lake Category Tourism; local products; management; culture Organization Green Home – Zeleni dom Partners Ulcinj municipality, Šas restaurant, local tourist boards, Ora NGO Location Šasko Lake Country Montenegro Form of protection Not a protected area Scope of implementation (local, Local (municipality) and national level national) Time 4 years People 7 Budget 111 000 EUR Funding Partner Fund for Critical Ecosystems Project info https://www.sasko.me/ Contact Nataša Kovačević Achievements ● Registration of local producers (honey, olive oil, wine) at Šasko Lake – 15 representatives. ● Formation of a joint platform of local households (20-40) having revenues from the sale of local products ● 5 trained birdwatching guides ● During the public debate on the Draft Urban Plan for the Ulcinj municipality, proposed golf course (50 ha) at Šasko Lake was rejected. Problem/opportunity Problem ● Lack of will to protect the area ● Large migration of the local population ● Poaching ● Lack of promotion of local products and areas Opportunity ● Natural values of Šasko Lake ● Organic production ● Authentic cultural and natural area ● Development of eco-tourism ● Sustainable development ● Joint management of natural values ● Local products Planning Pre-requisites for success Legal: ● Ensuring participation of the local population in the decision-making process in drafting spatial plans Local community: ● Community wants to protect its natural resources ● Active community, trust towards NGOs (representative was a minority member) Initial idea Increasing revenues for the local population through sustainable tourism on Šasko Lake for its conservation and protection. The desire to show the development of eco-tourism is a tool for the sustainable development of Montenegro.
    [Show full text]
  • In Bulgaria – Plovdiv
    ECOLOGIA BALKANICA International Scientific Research Journal of Ecology Special Edition 2 2019 Eight International Conference of FMNS (FMNS-2019) Modern Trends in Sciences South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Faculty of Mathematics & Natural Sciences Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, 26-30 June, 2019 UNION OF SCIENTISTS IN BULGARIA – PLOVDIV UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV PUBLISHING HOUSE ii International Standard Serial Number Online ISSN 1313-9940; Print ISSN 1314-0213 (from 2009-2015) Aim & Scope „Ecologia Balkanica” is an international scientific journal, in which original research articles in various fields of Ecology are published, including ecology and conservation of microorganisms, plants, aquatic and terrestrial animals, physiological ecology, behavioural ecology, population ecology, population genetics, community ecology, plant-animal interactions, ecosystem ecology, parasitology, animal evolution, ecological monitoring and bioindication, landscape and urban ecology, conservation ecology, as well as new methodical contributions in ecology. The journal is dedicated to publish studies conducted on the Balkans and Europe. Studies conducted anywhere else in the World may be accepted only as an exception after decision of the Editorial Board and the Editor-In-Chief. Published by the Union of Scientists in Bulgaria – Plovdiv and the University of Plovdiv Publishing house – twice a year. Language: English. Peer review process All articles included in “Ecologia Balkanica” are peer reviewed. Submitted manuscripts are sent to two or three independent peer reviewers, unless they are either out of scope or below threshold for the journal. These manuscripts will generally be reviewed by experts with the aim of reaching a first decision as soon as possible. The journal uses the double anonymity standard for the peer-review process.
    [Show full text]
  • Zahtjev Za Odlu Čivanje O Potrebi Izrade Elaborata Za Projekat ,,Funkcionisanje Radionice Za Obradu Iverice“, Nosioca Projekta „Sinani & Company“ D.O.O
    ZAHTJEV ZA ODLU ČIVANJE O POTREBI IZRADE ELABORATA ZA PROJEKAT ,,FUNKCIONISANJE RADIONICE ZA OBRADU IVERICE“, NOSIOCA PROJEKTA „SINANI & COMPANY“ D.O.O. ULCINJ Ulcinj, decembar 2019. godine S A D R Ž A J: 1. OPŠTE INFORMACIJE................................................................................ str. 3 2. OPIS LOKACIJE PROJEKTA..................................................................... str. 4 3. KARAKTERISTIKE (OPIS) PROJEKTA.................................................... str. 15 4. VRSTE I KARAKTERISTIKE MOGU ĆIH UTICAJA PROJEKTA NA ŽIVOTNU SREDINU.................................................................................. str.22 5. OPIS MOGU ĆIH ZNA ČAJNIH UTICAJA PROJEKTA NA ŽIVOTNU SREDINU.....................................................................................str.25 6. MJERE ZA SPRJE ČAVANJE, SMANJENJE ILI OTKLANJANJE ŠTETNIH UTICAJA...................................................................................... str 26 7. IZVOR PODATAKA..................................................................................... str.31 8. PRILOG ZAHTJEVA..................................................................................... str.33 2 1.OPŠTE INFORMACIJE a) NOSILAC PROJEKTA: „SINANI & COMPANY“ D.O.O. ULCINJ REGISTARSKI BROJ : 5-0412033/004 PIB : 02680181 PDV: 82/31-00964-1 ODGOVORNO LICE :GZIM SINANOVI Ć, izvršni direktor ADRESA : ŠTODRA BB; ULCINJ KONTAKT OSOBA : GZIM SINANOVI Ć BROJ TELEFONA : 063/ 224 225 b) NAZIV PROJEKTA: ,,FUNKCIONISANJE RADIONICE ZA OBRADU IVERICE“, NOSIOCA
    [Show full text]
  • (MNEE) Database Electoral Maps of Montenegro
    Montenegrin Elections (MNEE) Database i Electoral Maps of Montenegro III 6 VI 5 V XI 9 3 II 5 XIII 4 IV XIV 2 VIII 5 VII 17 3 IX 1 XII I 4 4 X 3 Version 1.0 Prepared by Boris Lipovina April 2021 i The map represents a vectorized, adapted and modified version of an administrative map of Montenegro created by Wikipedia user NordNordWest who released their map under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license (URL of a license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.en). i 1996 Parliamentary Elections ................................................................... 11 Contents 14 Constituencies System Introduction .....................................................................................................1 1996 Parliamentary Elections ...................................................................12 Seats and Percentage of Votes Won in Constituency, per Party/Coalition Administrative Maps of Montenegro ...................................................... 2 Official Map and Map Used for Depicting the Electoral System 1998 Parliamentary Elections ...................................................................13 The “Special Constituency”* System Administrative Maps of Municipalities - I ............................................... 3 Determining Precise Geographical Location of Special Polling Stations (1998-2009) 2001 Parliamentary Elections ..................................................................14 The “Minority Sub-Constituency”* System Administrative Maps of Municipalities
    [Show full text]