9.2 Housing Market

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

9.2 Housing Market Public Disclosure Authorized BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Housing Sector Assessment F i n a l R e p o r t Prepared for Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works Public Disclosure Authorized By The World Bank June2017 HOUSING IN BULGARIA Organization of the Document To facilitate ease of reading – given the length and complexity of the full report – this document includes the following: - A 5-page Executive Summary, which highlights the key messages; - A 20-page Short Report, which presents in some level of detail the analysis, together with the main conclusions and recommendations; - A 150-page Main Report, which includes the full Situation Analysis, followed by Findings and Recommendations in detail. i HOUSING IN BULGARIA Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations IV Currency Equivalents VI Acknowledgements VII Executive Summary 1 Short Report 6 Main Report 27 SITUATION ANALYSIS 29 INTRODUCTION 31 1.1 Context 31 1.2 Relevance to the CPF and other World Bank projects 33 HOUSING AND URBANIZATION 35 2.1 Population Trends 35 2.2 Emigration 35 2.3 City typologies and trends 38 HOUSING STOCK AND QUALITY 41 3.1 Housing Stock 41 3.2 Ownership and Tenure 46 3.3 Housing Quality 50 PROGRAMS, INSTITUTIONS, LAWS, AND PROCEDURES 56 4.1 Current Approach to Housing 56 4.2 EU- and State-Funded Programs in the Housing Sector 56 4.3 Other State support for housing 61 4.4 Public Sector Stakeholders 69 4.5 Legal Framework 71 i HOUSING IN BULGARIA 4.6 Relevant Legislation and Processes for Housing 80 LOWER INCOME AND VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS 86 5.1 Poverty and Deprivation 86 5.2 Roma 90 HOUSING MARKET AND FINANCE 105 6.1 Market Dynamics 105 6.2 Rental Housing 110 6.3 Housing Finance 111 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY 114 7.1 Affordability and Housing Cost Overburden 114 7.2 Income 116 7.3 Housing Affordability: Existing Market 118 7.4 Potential options for lower income households 125 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 127 KEY FINDINGS 129 8.1 High vacancy rate, surplus and overcrowding 130 8.2 Poor quality of old stock, potential seismic risk 132 8.3 Inadequate housing for poor and vulnerable groups 133 8.4 Limited reach of national government initiatives 137 RECOMMENDATIONS 143 9.1 Housing Policy: Fundamental Principles 143 9.2 Housing market 144 9.3 Old Socialist era housing stock 152 9.4 Low income and vulnerable groups 154 9.5 Social housing 157 9.6 Legal and Institutional Framework 160 References 164 ii HOUSING IN BULGARIA List of figures Figure (i): Population growth from 2001-2013 Figure (ii): National housing surplus Figure (iii): Housing surplus as a percentage of district housing stock compared to district population as percentage of national population Figure (iv): Overcrowding rate by degree of urbanization Figure (v): Number of housing units by construction materials and period of construction Figure (vi): Bulgaria Real House Price Index Figure (vii): Annual average market prices of dwellings in district centers Figure (viii): Functional housing market: Roles of public and private sector stakeholders Figure 1.1: The Housing Value Chain Figure 2.1: Population growth from 2001-2013 Figure 2.2: Number of households by residence and census year Figure 2.3: Percentage change in district population from 2001 to 2011 Figure 2.4: Classification of Bulgarian cities according to growth/decline in population and economic activity Figure 2.5: Change in Population between 1990 and 2015 as percent of total change Figure 3.1: National housing surplus Figure 3.2: Housing surplus in selected districts and Sofia as percent of contemporary existing stock Figure3.3: Housing surplus as a percentage of district housing stock compared to district population as percentage of national population Figure 3.4: Distribution of population by tenure status, 2014 Figure 3.5. Overcrowding rate by degree of urbanization Figure 3.6: Number of housing units by construction materials and period of construction Figure 5.1: Poverty rates according to ethnic groups, 2015 Figure 5.2: Share of poor between ethnic group by economic activity, 2015 Figure 5.3: Population at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion by ethnic groups, 2015 Figure 5.4: Poverty rate and thresholds at the district level, 2015 Figure 6.1: Bulgaria Real House Price Index Figure 6.2: Percent change in HPI from Q1 2015 to Q1 2016 Figure 6.3: Annual average market prices of dwellings in district centers Figure 6.4: Breakdown of selling price Figure 6.5: Bulgaria residential building permits Figure 6.6: Deposit interest rate in Bulgaria Figure 7.1 (a): Affordability of unit purchase in Sofia Figure 7.1 (b): Upfront costs of purchase in Sofia in terms of months of income, by NSI income deciles Figure 7.2 (a): Affordability for old unit purchase in Blagoevgrad Figure 7.2 (b): Upfront costs of purchase in Blagoevgrad in terms of months of income Figure 7.3 (a): Affordability for old unit purchase in Montana Figure 7.3 (b): Upfront costs of purchase in Montana in terms of months of income Figure 7.4 (a): Affordability for old unit purchase in Pleven Figure 7.4 (b): Upfront costs of purchase in Pleven in terms of months of income Figure 7.5: Affordability of Rental Figure 9.1: Functional housing market: Roles of public and private sector stakeholders Figure 9.2: Housing co-operatives offer a midpoint between public and private housing List of tables Table (i): Vacant dwelling units in Bulgaria, 2011 Table 2.1: Population statistics by district Table 2.2: Population development over time in the four cases study cities Table 3.1: Dwelling units by district, 2011 Table 3.2: Vacant dwelling units in Bulgaria, 2011 Table 3.3: Vacancy rate at district level, 2011 i HOUSING IN BULGARIA Table 3.4: Discrepancy between dwelling unit surplus and vacant dwellings, 2011 Table 3.5: Newly built dwelling units by municipalities Table 3.6: Tenure status in % of the population according to income and type of household, 2015 Table 3.7: Dwelling units by mode of habitation, 2011 Table 3.8: Overcrowding rate (%) for tenants versus owners in Bulgaria and in EU-28, 2015 Table 3.9: Overcrowding rate (%) in Bulgaria and in EU-28, 2015 Table 4.1: Integrated actions for sustainable urban development – indicative amounts of ERDF and ESF support Table 4.2: Social welfare subsidies related to housing Table 4.3: Maximum income and coefficients for receiving monthly monetary subsidy and targeted assistance for heating Table 4.4: Construction and Building Permitting Process in Bulgaria Table 4.5: Illustrative cost and duration of permitting process for residential buildings by category Table 4.6: Stages in the purchase and sale of property Table 5.1: Material deprivation items by ethnic group, 2015 Table 5.2: Place of residence of the large ethnic communities (%) Table 5.3: Development indicators for Roma in EU-11 and Bulgaria Table 5.4: Development Indicators comparing Roma and non-Roma Table 5.5: Monthly expenditure (as a share of total expenditure) Table 5.6 Outstanding payments (share of people) Table 5.7 Sources of energy for Roma and non-Roma households Table 5.8: Building legalization and Tolerance Certificates Table 5.9: Dwelling ownership rate Table 6.1: Nominal House Price Indices for Bulgaria, Sofia, Varna, and Plovdiv Table 6.2: Ballpark house price range to different income segments in Sofia Table 6.3 Housing market trends/indicators (2006-2016) Table 6.4: Indicators for residential lending Table 7.1: Housing cost overburden threshold by income quintile Table 7.2: Housing Cost Overburden Rate Table 7.3: Housing Cost Overburden Rate in 2015 by Income Quintile Table 7.4: Monthly household income by decile (BGN), 2015 Table 7.5: Household income categorization used by developers in Sofia Table 7.6: Share of Household Expenditure Table 7.7: Square meter prices for old units (outside of Sofia) and new units Table 7.8: Income deciles (2015) and housing cost overburden thresholds Table 7.9 Square meters of old construction affordable to different decile groups with a standard mortgage loan Table 7.10: Maximum square meter price affordable for a 50 m2 old unit using a standard mortgage loan Table 7.11: Years of savings needed in order to self-finance a 50 m2 house in different cities Table 8.1: Vacant housing units in Bulgaria, 2011 Table 9.1: General framework for the roles of public and private counterparts in housing PPPs Table 9.2: Typical components in a housing PPP Table 9.3: Illustrative subsidy amounts for rental vouchers List of boxes Box 3.1 Disaster Risk in Bulgaria Box 3.2: Contents of a Technical Passport Box 4.1: Housing for disabled people in Sofia Box 5.1: Tensions between local authorities and the Roma Box 6.1: Student accommodations: Interviews Box 8.1: Requirements for proof of address Box 8.2: Blagoevgrad: National Program for Energy Efficiency ii HOUSING IN BULGARIA Box 9.1: Examples of housing databases in other countries and regions Box 9.2: Cooperative Housing and Housing Associations Box 9.3: Kazakhstan: Housing Allowance Program Box 9.4: Decent Homes Standard, UK List of plates Plate (i): Panel buildings Plate (ii): Roma settlement in Sofia Plate (iii): Residential buildings in Blagoevgrad retrofitted under NEEP Plate 3.1: Panel buildings Plate 4.1: Renovated panel buildings in Blagoevgrad Plate 4.2: Municipal housing in the Roma neighborhoods in Sofia Plate 4.3: Newly constructed Category 1 social housing in Dupnitsa Plate 5.1: Roma settlement in Fakulteta, Sofia Plate 5.2: Roma settlement in Filipovtsi, Sofia Plate 5.3: Roma settlement in Hristo Botev, Sofia Plate 5.4: Households in low
Recommended publications
  • The Central Regions and the Sofia Agglomeration Area
    Maria Shishmanova THE CENTRAL REGIONS AND THE SOFIA AGGLOMERATION AREA Abstract. The research presents central regions in Bulgaria using taxonometric method with relevant conclusions. Each municipality in central regions is particularly examined by the elaborated methodic materials. The developed agglomeration areas are situated in the central regions. Sofia agglomeration area is presented using General Spatial Plan of Sofia municipality and Municipal Development Plan (MDP) of Sofia metropolitan municipality. It is set out the vision of development and its priorities, objectives and measures. Key words: central regions, agglomeration areas, Sofia agglomeration area, General Spatial Plan, Municipal Development Plan. Introduction The Central regions comprise 45 percent of the Bulgarian territory. The agglomeration areas are formed in them. The present study examines the development of the Sofia agglomeration area – a metropolis in the central regions of Bulgaria. The agglomeration areas are formed within the range of the central regions in Bulgaria – 6 agglomeration areas with a center – a large city, 30 agglomeration areas with a center – a medium-sized town. Six of the agglomeration areas are formations with more than three municipalities, five of them are with three municipalities each, ten are with 2 municipalities and the rest 15 are autonomous municipalities with an established core. These areas represent the backbone of the economy and social and human potential of the country. They have the highest degree of competitiveness and attractiveness for investment and innovation. Eighty eight municipalities with a total population of 5885455 people1 are included within the scope of the agglomeration areas, which constitutes 77.4 percent of the population of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics in the Middle of the Balkans
    feaTureS Physics in the middle of the Balkans I Alexander G. Petrov, Nicholay S. Tonchev and Oleg I. Yordanov - DOI: 10.1051/epn/ 2011602 Half a century ago, the Bulgarian Physics community created the Union of the Physicists in Bulgaria (UPB), as in many other countries in that post war period. In this article we outline the history of Physics in Bulgaria, its current state and discuss its future place and perspectives within the Balkan region and in Europe. f founded formally in 1971, UPB has a much lon - ger and illustrious history. Twenty years aer the liberation from the Ottoman rule, the physicists and I mathematicians founded the Bulgarian Physical and Mathematical Society (BPMS, Sofia, March 29, 1898). Note that the secular education with limited mathematics came into the Bulgarian schools as late as in the 1830s-40s, the first Bulgarian high school starting in the early 1860s. e first higher education institution arrived as a pedagogical school in 1888 to become in 1904 the Sofia University (SU). Facing more and more students and professionals beyond 1950, BPMS split (1971) into Bulgarian Physical Society and Bulgarian Mathematical Society. On November 25, 1989, two months aer the fall of the Ber - lin wall, the Bulgarian Physical Society reorganized and became the Union of the Physicists in Bulgaria. Independent of political vagaries, the presidents of UPB or previous organizations have always been outstanding physicists. In the difficult 1945-1950 period the president was Georgi Nadjakov, Fellow of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (FBAS), who had worked with both Marie Curie and Paul Langevin in the 20-ies.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Economic Changes in Blagoevgrad in Connection with the Integration of Bulgaria’S to Eu
    Discussion Papers 2007. Regionality and/or Locality 169-177. p. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGES IN BLAGOEVGRAD IN CONNECTION WITH THE INTEGRATION OF BULGARIA’S TO EU ALEKSANDRA RAVNACHKA This research aims to demonstrate, analyze and assess the socio-economic changes in Blagoevgrad municipality in connection with Bulgaria's integration to the EU. The municipality of Blagoevgrad is located in Southwest Bulgaria and occupies an area of 628 km2. According to the regional scheme of the country, the munici- pality includes the town of Blagoevgrad and its adjacent 25 villages. The town of Blagoevgrad is situated of 100 km south of the capital city of Sofia and proximity by the Republic Macedonia and Greece. The geographical location of the munici- pality favours its development. The demographic factors have a considerable im- pact on the development of Blagoevgrad municipality. Until 1998 its population was growing but since then it has been slowly decreasing. During 1992–2001 the average annual population drop was by -0.05%. The main causes for this decline are a low birth rate, high death rate, migration, etc. In 2005 the inhabitants of the municipality were 77,183 (data source: GRAO) which constituted 23.2% of the district's population and 1.0% of the country's population (Table 1, Figure 1). Most of the municipality’s population lives in the town of Blagoevgrad. The share of urban population in the municipality is 91.2% and has the rural population – 8.7%. For comparison sake the ratio urban: rural population in the whole district is 57.2%: 42.8%.
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL HERITAGE in MIGRATION Published Within the Project Cultural Heritage in Migration
    CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Published within the project Cultural Heritage in Migration. Models of Consolidation and Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Communities Abroad funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund © Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova, Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova, editors, 2017 © Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum – BAS, 2017 © Paradigma Publishing House, 2017 ISBN 978-954-326-332-5 BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ETHNOLOGY AND FOLKLORE STUDIES WITH ETHNOGRAPHIC MUSEUM CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Edited by Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova Paradigma Sofia • 2017 CONTENTS EDITORIAL............................................................................................................................9 PART I: CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A PROCESS DISPLACEMENT – REPLACEMENT. REAL AND INTERNALIZED GEOGRAPHY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MIGRATION............................................21 Slobodan Dan Paich THE RUSSIAN-LIPOVANS IN ITALY: PRESERVING CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS HERITAGE IN MIGRATION.............................................................41 Nina Vlaskina CLASS AND RELIGION IN THE SHAPING OF TRADITION AMONG THE ISTANBUL-BASED ORTHODOX BULGARIANS...............................55 Magdalena Elchinova REPRESENTATIONS OF ‘COMPATRIOTISM’. THE SLOVAK DIASPORA POLITICS AS A TOOL FOR BUILDING AND CULTIVATING DIASPORA.............72 Natália Blahová FOLKLORE AS HERITAGE: THE EXPERIENCE OF BULGARIANS IN HUNGARY.......................................................................................................................88
    [Show full text]
  • Sapareva Banya / Panichishte
    Bulgaria, Sofia 5B, Triaditza Str Tel.: +359 2 980 10 68; 986 79 03, Mobile: + 359 889 137 478 Fax: +359 2 980 53 94 [email protected] www.planettours.bg www.sporttoursbulgaria.com License N ° 05565, IATA Member Sapareva Banya / Panichishte COORDINATES: Latitude in decimal degrees: +42.17 Longitude in decimal degrees: +23.16 Elevation in meters: 983 m. asl Sapareva Banya is a town in southwestern Bulgaria, part of Kyustendil Province. It is located at the north foot of the Rila mountain 15 km east of Dupnitsa. The town is known for its hot mineral (103 °C (217 °F)) and clear mountain water, as well as the geyser in the town centre that sprang forth in 1957. Panichishte is a village in south Bulgaria. It is located in Sapareva Banya municipality, Kyustendil Province. Panichishte is a starting point for pedestrian route to “Pionerska”, “Lovna”, “Skakavica”, “Vada”, “Rilski ezera”, “Sedemte ezera” rest houses and etc. From “Pionerska” rest house in Panichishte to “Rilski ezera” rest house since 2009 there is a chairlift for about 16 minutes. Bulgaria, Sofia 5B, Triaditza Str Tel.: +359 2 980 10 68; 986 79 03, Mobile: + 359 889 137 478 Fax: +359 2 980 53 94 [email protected] www.planettours.bg www.sporttoursbulgaria.com License N ° 05565, IATA Member Geography: Sapareva Banya is situated in west Bulgaria. The geographic location of the region is favourable for the development of tourism. The district centre Sapareva Banya is located 70 km away from the capital of Bulgaria, Sofia, and 30 km away from the winter resort Borovets.
    [Show full text]
  • Models of Architecture from the Middle Ages to Present on the Valley of Struma River
    MODELS OF ARCHITECTURE FROM THE MIDDLE AGES TO PRESENT ON THE VALLEY OF STRUMA RIVER Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria Brestovo Monastery “St. Archangel Michael”, Municipality of Simitly, Bulgaria Pirin village, Bulgaria Melnik, Bulgaria Serres, Greece Blagoevgrad is the largest city in Southwest Bulgaria, the administrative center of Blagoevgrad District and Blagoevgrad Municipality. It is situated at the foot of the southwestern slopes of the Rila Mountain, in the valley of the Struma River, 100 km south from the capital Sofia. The city is located on the two banks of the Bistritsa river, just before its inflow into the Struma River. Besides the clear waters of the river, important factors for the development of the city were the mineral springs and the favorable central location of the city, situated between Sofia and Thessaloniki, Kyustendil and Razlog. About 35 km away from the city, in the upper course of the Bistritsa River, is located the ancient Parangalitsa forest - one of the most valuable reserves in Bulgaria. In 1973, it was proclaimed by UNESCO as a Biosphere Reserve. The history of Blagoevgrad dates back to 10th century BC. The Thracian settlement Skaptopara (Upper Market) was founded around the mineral springs around 300 BC. This settlement has been associated with the Thracian tribe Denteleti who inhabited the upper valley of the Struma River. In the 1st century AD the Thracians were conquered by the Romans. A Roman settlement from 3rd-5th century has been discovered in 2017, near the village of Pokrovnik, about 3 km from Blagoevgrad. The establishment’s location did coincide with the planned route of Struma highway and it has been destroyed, with only a few of the excavated buildings being moved away from the road.
    [Show full text]
  • About Bulgaria
    Source: Zone Bulgaria (http://en.zonebulgaria.com/) About Bulgaria General Information about Bulgaria Bulgaria is a country in Southeastern Europe and is situated on the Balkan Peninsula. To the north the country borders Rumania, to the east – the Black Sea, to the south – Turkey and Greece, and to the west – Yugoslavia and Macedonia. Bulgaria is a parliamentary republic with a National Assembly (One House Parliament) of 240 national representatives. The President is Head of State. Geography of Bulgaria The Republic of Bulgaria covers a territory of 110 993 square kilometres. The average altitude of the country is 470 metres above sea level. The Stara Planina Mountain occupies central position and serves as a natural dividing line from the west to the east. It is a 750 km long mountain range stretching from the Vrushka Chuka Pass to Cape Emine and is part of the Alpine-Himalayan mountain range. It reaches the Black Sea to the east and turns to the north along the Bulgarian-Yugoslavian border. A natural boundary with Romania is the Danube River, which is navigable all along for cargo and passenger vessels. The Black Sea is the natural eastern border of Bulgaria and its coastline is 378 km long. There are clearly cut bays, the biggest two being those of Varna and Bourgas. About 25% of the coastline are covered with sand and hosts our seaside resorts. The southern part of Bulgaria is mainly mountainous. The highest mountain is Rila with Mt. Moussala being the highest peak on the Balkan Peninsula (2925 m). The second highest and the mountain of most alpine character in Bulgaria is Pirin with its highest Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • 7563/11 HGN/Tt 1 DG H 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 10 March 2011 THE EUROPEAN UNION 7563/11 COPEN 44 EJN 20 EUROJUST 29 NOTE from: Bulgarian Permanent Representation to Delegations Subject: Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders – the Republic of Bulgaria Delegations will find enclosed the notification made by Bulgaria in relation to the abovementioned framework decision. _______________ 7563/11 HGN/tt 1 DG H 2B EN DECLARATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS BY THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 3, ARTICLE 7(5) AND ARTICLE 19 OF COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2006/783/JHA OF 6 OCTOBER 2006 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO CONFISCATION ORDERS The Republic of Bulgaria hereby notifies the General Secretariat of the Council of the following declarations and notifications pursuant to Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders and the Law on the recognition, execution and transmission of decisions on confiscation or seizure and decisions on the enforcement of financial penalties adopted by the National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria on 11 February 2010 (published in the State Journal of the Republic of Bulgaria No 15 of 23 February 2010), which transposes the abovementioned Framework Decision into the law of the Republic of Bulgaria. 1) Notification pursuant to Article 3 of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA (determination of the competent authorities): (а) When the Republic of Bulgaria is the executing State: The competent authorities with regard to the recognition of confiscation or seizure orders shall be the provincial courts and Sofia City Court.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ESSETERRE CO-IMPACT STORY Melissa Planting
    Rebuilding Bulgaria THE ESSETERRE CO-IMPACT STORY Melissa planting A New and Different Chapter for Bulgaria Bulgaria is a country rich with opportunity, but it has faced challenges in reaching its full potential. Bulgaria is part of the European Union (EU), but has one of the lowest GDP in the EU—with nearly a quarter of its population living at or below the global poverty line—and is experiencing at present the most extreme population decline in the world. Sadly, each year emigration erases dozens of towns from Bulgaria’s map. High death and low birth rates are also significant factors in depopulation, but lack of opportunity is the primary driver for this migration away from the country. As the nation’s men and women search for jobs abroad, severe structural and industrial decay become increasingly common. Experts on distribution of EU funds cite the high concentration of investments and resources in certain regions at the expense of others as a contributing factor to lagging infrastructure and a diminishing population. Before the fall of Communism, Bulgaria was not only produces some of the world’s best Lavender and an active industrial nation, it also had some of the Melissa. Its sunny and dry climate during harvest world’s preeminent essential oil research, development, coupled with dry, well-drained, sandy soils are ideal for and production. Organizations like the Rose Institute in these aromatic plants. For these reasons, dōTERRA Kazanlak were renowned for their sophistication and chose Eastern Bulgaria as the place to create a world- cutting-edge research. In the Post-Communist Era, not class production center for some of its most valued oils.
    [Show full text]
  • USAID and Sustainable Tourism
    ANNEX 2. PROJECT PROFILES 2.A: BULGARIA Project Name: Biodiversity Conservation and Contract Number: LAG-I-00-99-00013-00, Task Economic Growth (BCEG) (Phases I and II) Order 001 Project Duration: 2000 to 2004 Funding Mechanism: IQC - BIOFOR, Biodiversity and Sustainable Forestry Strategic Objective: 183-0410 Special Initiatives Donor Agencies/Partners: • Associates in Rural Development (ARD) • Government of Bulgaria Ministry of Environment and Water • Government of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy • Ministry of Agriculture and Forests • Rila and Central Balkan National Parks • Strandja Nature Park • Foundation for Local Government Reform • Bulgarian Association for Alternative Tourism • Bulgarian Tourism Union • Pirin Tourism Forum • Regional Tourism Association of Stara Planina • Conservation NGO’s s.a. Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds • US Agency for International Development • United Nations Development Program • Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe • World Bank/Global Environment Facility CONTEXT Bulgaria has a rich history and a unique and internationally significant nature and culture; conservation and cultural identity are particularly strong in rural areas. The country, which is positioned at a crossroads between Europe and Asia, contains nine World Heritage sites, and has rich cultural, historical, and religious resources reaching back from the ancient Greeks and beyond medieval times. It contains mountain ski resorts, beaches with sun and sand (the self-named “sun-and-sand-stalag”), and many “wild” and undeveloped rural areas for adventure seekers. These resources provide a strong base for tourism in Bulgaria. In the mid-1990s, while many sectors of the Bulgarian economy were registering losses, statistics reported by the National Statistic Institute and Ministry of Finance show the tourism sector was steadily generating positive financial results.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Europa Per I Cittadini
    Europa per i cittadini The project « POWER- EUROPEAN NETWORK OF WOMAN MAYORS FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES IN CITIZENS LIFE» was funded with the support of the European Union under the Programme "Europe for Citizens" Applicable to the Strand 2 – Measure 2.2 "Networks of Towns" 6 events have been carried out within this project: Event 1 Participation: The event involved 126 citizens, including: - 6 participants from the city of Ciudad Real (Spain), - 4 participants from the city of Blagoevgrad (Bulgaria), - 4 participants from the city of Labin (Croatia), - 4 participants from the city of Tetovo (Macedonia), - 1 participant from the city of Vilnius (Lithuania), - 1 participant from the city of Wien (Austria), - 3 participants from the city of Pittsburgh (USA), - 5 participants from the city of Buenos Aires (Argentina), - 5 participants from the city of Hamburg (Germany), - 1 participant from the city of Rotterdam (Netherlands), - 2 participants from the city of Liverpool (UK), - 1 participant from the city of Uppsala (Sweden), - 1 participant from the city of San Marino (Republic of San Marino), - 88 participants from the cities of Pollina, Montagnareale, Castelbuono, Sinagra, Vita, Geraci Siculo, Rimini (Italy). Location / Dates: The event took place in Pollina (Italy), from 4/12/2014 to 6/12/2014 Short description: The first day of meeting (December 4th 2014) started with the welcome of the Mayor of Pollina, Mrs Magda Culotta, to the public audience and to the European delegations from partner organizations Municipality of Tetovo (Macedonia), Municipality of Ciudad Real (Spain), Municipality of Labin (Croatia) and the Association South Western Municipalities (Bulgaria). They presented their Municipalities with a particular focus about gender policies realized.
    [Show full text]