Ing in the Gray Zone

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ing in the Gray Zone Operating in the Gray Zone Countering Iran’s Asymmetric Way of War Michael Eisenstadt Operating in the Gray Zone Countering Iran’s Asymmetric Way of War Michael Eisenstadt THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY www.washingtoninstitute.org Policy Focus 162 First publication: January 2020 All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2020 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1111 19th Street NW, Suite 500 Washington DC 20036 www.washingtoninstitute.org Design by Sensical Design & Communication Cover image by Yarr65/Shutterstock Contents Acknowledgments iv Author’s Note: The Killing of Qasem Soleimani—Avoiding Escalation and a Broader Conflict v Executive Summary vii 1. Introduction 1 2. Defining Gray Zone, Asymmetric, and Hybrid Warfare 5 3. Iran’s Gray Zone Strategy 13 4. Toward a U.S. Gray Zone Strategy 26 5. Conclusion 37 Appendix: Asymmetry in Iran’s Gray Zone Operations 39 iii Acknowledgments he author would like to thank Omer Carmi, Frank Hoffman, Michael Knights, Patrick Clawson, and Assaf Orion for their vital feedback on a prior draft of this piece; Hannah Coupe for her invaluable research assistance; and Arjan Ganji, Cyrus Jabbari, and Jonathan Sameyach for their indispensable Persian-language Tresearch assistance and translation support. Finally, the author would like to thank Jason Warshof and Miriam Himmelfarb for their patience and deft editing of the paper, and Daniel Kohan for the appealing layout and cover design. iv Author’s Note The Killing of Qasem Soleimani— Avoiding Escalation and a Broader Conflict his monograph incorporates information Muhandis, the KH commander and de facto head of available as of mid-December 2019 and was Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces in a missile strike, being readied for publication when the most citing intelligence that Soleimani was planning a recent round of U.S.-Iran escalation culmi- series of attacks on U.S. diplomats and military per- nated in the targeted killing on January 3, sonnel in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and beyond.4 T2020, of Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani, the head of the With these events, U.S.-Iran tensions have entered Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps–Qods Force a new, more fraught phase, with a heightened poten- (IRGC-QF). Tehran has threatened to avenge Soleima- tial for escalation, as Iran prepares to avenge Solei- ni’s death, underscoring the importance—more than mani’s death. Strategy, properly understood and ever before—of understanding Iran’s asymmetric practiced, is first and foremost a learning process, way of war and developing a strategy to counter it. and it is therefore essential for policymakers to draw First, some background. According to U.S. officials, appropriate lessons from these recent events to for- since May 2019 pro-Iran proxies carried out more mulate more effective strategy from here on. than ninety attacks on U.S. personnel in Iraq, and First, the nearly eight months in which the United between late October and December 2019, Kataib States did not respond forcefully to a series of mili- Hezbollah (KH), Iran’s foremost Iraqi proxy, launched tary provocations and attacks almost certainly con- eleven rocket strikes on Iraqi military bases hosting tributed to the increasingly assertive and audacious U.S. military personnel as part of Tehran’s pushback actions by Iran and its proxies (i.e., the mining of against Washington’s maximum pressure policy.1 six tankers in May and June, the downing of a U.S. These incidents were likely intended to warn the Global Hawk drone in June, the drone and cruise United States and to press it to ease sanctions on missile strike on Saudi oil facilities in September, Iran. Although no U.S. personnel were killed in these and the uptick since late October in rocket attacks harassment attacks—several Iraqis were killed and on U.S. personnel in Iraq). Might this escalation and injured—the size of the rockets used and of the salvos the death of the U.S. contractor have been averted fired increased over time. had the United States responded earlier with nonle- Then, on December 27, 2019, thirty-one rockets thal “warning shots” of its own? And might this past hit an Iraqi security forces base near Kirkuk, kill- record of restraint and President Trump’s repeated ing a U.S. contractor and wounding four U.S. ser- pledges to pull U.S. troops out of the Middle East con- vice members and several ISF personnel—thereby vince Tehran that he lacks the stomach to endure a crossing a longstanding U.S. redline.2 The United prolonged gray zone campaign that inflicts painful States responded on December 29 with airstrikes costs on the United States? against five KH bases in Iraq and Syria that it Second, while the December 29 U.S. strike on KH claims hosted the group’s command-and-control facilities was a necessary departure from the U.S. elements and storage facilities for weapons used policy of excessive restraint, aspects of the oper- in these attacks, killing twenty-five and wounding ation seem ill-considered. Given local sensitivities fifty-one KH fighters.3 On December 31, hundreds of regarding the U.S. presence in Iraq, it might have KH militiamen and their supporters besieged the been preferable to target only KH facilities in Syria, U.S. embassy in response, torching and wrecking while also targeting IRGC-QF facilities or person- reception areas at the compound entrance. After nel there. And might it have been better to target two days of violence, the rioters withdrew, but KH more junior IRGC-QF personnel than Soleimani in promised to revive efforts in parliament to expel order to deter further action, rather than to under- U.S. forces from Iraq. Then, on January 3, 2020, the take such a potentially escalatory act? These U.S. United States killed Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al- strikes have provoked a backlash in Iraq across the v Operating in the Gray Zone political spectrum, enabled Iran and its proxies to pitfalls of both excessive restraint and overkill. Such divert attention from ongoing anti-government and an approach would be more consistent with the U.S. anti-Iran protests there, and may energize efforts public mood—which is tired of “endless” Middle East in parliament to expel U.S. forces. And rather than wars—the regional operational environment, and a deter, they may lead to further escalation and per- U.S. national defense strategy that seeks to shift focus haps a broader conflict. and forces to the Indo-Pacific region.5 Finally, given the potential risks and costs of the It is therefore my hope that as U.S.-Iran tensions current U.S. approach, which relies on overt action, enter a new, more dangerous phase, this monograph blunt force, and emphatic messaging, it is appropriate may provide a road map for an alternative strategy to ask whether there are less fraught and more effec- that might help U.S. policymakers navigate the uncer- tive ways to achieve the desired deterrent effect. Such tain days ahead and advance U.S. interests in the an alternative approach, outlined in this monograph, Middle East, while avoiding further escalation and a would rely more heavily on covert or unacknowl- broader conflict with the Islamic Republic. edged activities, subtlety, and discreet messaging; on the pursuit of advantage through cumulative, incre- Michael Eisenstadt mental gains rather than dramatic, decisive blows Washington DC that are liable to be escalatory; and would avoid the January 3, 2020 Notes 1. U.S. Department of State, “Press Briefing with Special Commander,” Defense News, December 2, 2017, https://www. Representative for Iran and Senior Policy Advisor for the defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/reagan-defense- Secretary of State Brian Hook and Assistant Secretary for forum/2017/12/03/cia-director-confirms-he-sent-warning- Near Eastern Affairs David Schenker and State Department letter-to-quds-commander/. Spokesperson Morgan Ortagus,” December 30, 2019, 3. U.S. Department of Defense, statement from Assistant to https://www.state.gov/special-briefing-via-telephone-with- the Secretary of Defense Jonathan Hoffman, December special-representative-for-iran-and-senior-policy-advisor- 29, 2019, https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/ to-the-secretary-of-state-brian-hook-and-assistant- Release/Article/2047960/statement-from-assistant-to- secretary-for-near-eastern-affairs-david-schenker-and-s/. the-secretary-of-defense-jonathan-hoffman/. 2. Missy Ryan, Greg Jaffe, and John Hudson, “Pompeo Warns 4. Statement by the Department of Defense, January 2, 2020, Iran About Trigger for U.S. Military Action as Some in https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/ Administration Question Aggressive Policy,” Washington Article/2049534/statement-by-the-department-of-defense/. Post, June 18, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/ 5. U.S. Department of Defense, “Summary of the 2018 National national-security/pompeo-warns-iran-about-trigger-for-us- Defense Strategy: Sharpening the American Military’s military-action-as-some-in-administration-question- Competitive Edge,” January 2018, https://dod.defense.gov/ aggressive-policy/2019/06/18/48bd3be0-9116-11e9-b570- Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense- 6416efdc0803_story.html. See also Joe Gould, “CIA Direc- Strategy-Summary.pdf. tor Confirms He Sent Warning Letter to Iranian Quds vi Executive Summary ince the establishment of the Islamic Republic because it knows how bloody and costly they can be. in 1979, Iran has distinguished itself as per- When it has to fight, it prefers to do so on foreign soil, haps the world’s foremost practitioner of “gray far from its borders, and to rely on proxies for much of zone” activities.
Recommended publications
  • Iran Vies for More Influence in Iraq at a Budget Price by Farzin Nadimi
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 3405 Iran Vies for More Influence in Iraq at a Budget Price by Farzin Nadimi Dec 3, 2020 Also available in Arabic / Farsi ABOUT THE AUTHORS Farzin Nadimi Farzin Nadimi, an associate fellow with The Washington Institute, is a Washington-based analyst specializing in the security and defense affairs of Iran and the Persian Gulf region. Brief Analysis Tehran aims to earn hard currency for its relatively cheap military hardware, ideally boosting its leverage in Baghdad at a fraction of the cost that the United States has been spending there. n November 14, a large Iraqi defense delegation began a four-day visit to Tehran as a follow-up to previous O exchanges with Iranian officials. The trip was led by Sunni defense minister Juma Saadoun al-Jubouri and included the commanders of each Iraqi military branch. According to Jubouri, its main goal was to “deepen” bilateral military and security cooperation. Three days later, the commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF), Brig. Gen. Esmail Qaani, reportedly paid a secret visit to Baghdad. These exchanges are all the more notable because they came after the UN ban on arms deals with Iran expired in October. Tehran is now free to market and sell its weapons abroad, and several potential customers have already shown interest—not just Iraq, but also Syria, Venezuela, and other players. To be sure, all of these governments are financially constrained, and the United States will likely continue disrupting such deals via existing secondary sanctions, most of them based on UN Security Council resolutions adopted between 2006 and 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • “State of Civil Society Report: 2015
    the year in review State of Civil Society report 2015: THE YEAR IN REVIEW ...these stories tell us that only civil introduction society, in its broadest sense, is taking a It has been another year of hard work and high achievement for civil society. The story of the year since the stance against the 2014 State of Civil Society Report was published has partly been one of a continuing series of attacks on civil concentration of society in the many countries where, when civil society asks difficult questions about power, the powerful seek to silence it. But is has also been a story of impressive and sustained civil society response, in a world that has power in the hands of become more turbulent and contested. a tiny, global, super- rich elite, and against As we show below, civil society faces challenges - of lack of space, under-resourcing and limited access to the attempts of many decision-makers. Civil society also needs continually to prove its connection with and relevance to citizens, political leaders and and it needs to demonstrate its ability to stay ahead of trends and innovate. When civil society groups do not corporate interests do these, they fail. But so often, we see civil society leading the response to crisis, taking on difficult issues, contributing to change, and winning arguments for social justice. to undermine human rights and This year in review section of the 2015 CIVICUS State of Civil Society Report is complemented by our report’s the value of people’s special thematic section on the resourcing for civil society, and the 27 guest contributions, from civil society participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Prism Vol. 9, No. 2 Prism About Vol
    2 021 PRISMVOL. 9, NO. 2 | 2021 PRISM VOL. 9, NO. 2 NO. 9, VOL. THE JOURNAL OF COMPLEX OPER ATIONS PRISM ABOUT VOL. 9, NO. 2, 2021 PRISM, the quarterly journal of complex operations published at National Defense University (NDU), aims to illuminate and provoke debate on whole-of-government EDITOR IN CHIEF efforts to conduct reconstruction, stabilization, counterinsurgency, and irregular Mr. Michael Miklaucic warfare operations. Since the inaugural issue of PRISM in 2010, our readership has expanded to include more than 10,000 officials, servicemen and women, and practi- tioners from across the diplomatic, defense, and development communities in more COPYEDITOR than 80 countries. Ms. Andrea L. Connell PRISM is published with support from NDU’s Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS). In 1984, Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger established INSS EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS within NDU as a focal point for analysis of critical national security policy and Ms. Taylor Buck defense strategy issues. Today INSS conducts research in support of academic and Ms. Amanda Dawkins leadership programs at NDU; provides strategic support to the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, combatant commands, and armed services; Ms. Alexandra Fabre de la Grange and engages with the broader national and international security communities. Ms. Julia Humphrey COMMUNICATIONS INTERNET PUBLICATIONS PRISM welcomes unsolicited manuscripts from policymakers, practitioners, and EDITOR scholars, particularly those that present emerging thought, best practices, or train- Ms. Joanna E. Seich ing and education innovations. Publication threshold for articles and critiques varies but is largely determined by topical relevance, continuing education for national and DESIGN international security professionals, scholarly standards of argumentation, quality of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE of SOUTH AFRICA and ISRAEL. a Thesis Submitted In
    THE ROLE REGIME TYPE PLAYS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE COOPERATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA AND ISRAEL. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Administration in the Department of Political Studies, University of the Western Cape. By Dean John Walbrugh Supervisor: Professor Joelien Pretorius July 2019 KEYWORDS South Africa Israel Intelligence Cooperation Regime Type South African State Security Agency (SSA) Mossad Culture Identity Realism Liberalism Constructivism i ABSTRACT This thesis explores the intelligence cooperation exhibited between South Africa and Israel during the time periods of apartheid (1948-1994) and post-apartheid (1994-2015). Regime type is explored as a factor impacting on the intelligence relationship in both periods. Pertinent to the case study is the fact that South Africa and Israel’s regime type shared commonalities during the first period, but not the second. The thesis examines how these commonalities facilitated intelligence cooperation during apartheid, then turns to the question how the change in South Africa’s regime type after 1994 (whilst Israel’s remained the same) impacted on intelligence cooperation. In order to understand the significance of South Africa’s regime change on the intelligence relationship between the two states, a comprehensive theoretical framework is proposed in order to analyse how and why the internal policies of the two states redirected their intelligence relationship. Within this thesis, the concept of regime type is not used in a conventional way, it is framed through a constructivist notion that includes a focus on identity and how this shapes the two states’ intelligence bureaucratic behaviour. This constructivist framing is in turn juxtaposed to two other International Relations (IR) theories, namely: realism and liberalism.
    [Show full text]
  • IRGC Navy Leadership Change May Not Signal Imminent Behavior Change | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 3011 IRGC Navy Leadership Change May Not Signal Imminent Behavior Change by Farzin Nadimi Sep 5, 2018 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Farzin Nadimi Farzin Nadimi, an associate fellow with The Washington Institute, is a Washington-based analyst specializing in the security and defense affairs of Iran and the Persian Gulf region. Brief Analysis Despite the appointment of a radical anti-American commander, Iran’s naval forces are unlikely to resume frequent provocations without a strategic shift at the very top of the regime. n August 23, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei promoted the acting commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary O Guard Corps Navy (IRGCN), Alireza Tangsiri, to full commander, replacing Ali Fadavi, who was appointed as the wider IRGC’s deputy commander for coordination. In his appointment letter, Tangsiri was instructed to build an “agile and growing naval arm on par with [the demands of the] Islamic Republic” by carrying out three main objectives: making use of “religious manpower,” improving the navy’s “training, skills, intelligence dominance, and interoperability with other IRGC branches,” and “expanding its arsenal even further.” Yet his promotion does not necessarily signal a shift back to tense naval provocations in Persian Gulf waters, depending on how Khamenei decides to respond to forthcoming oil sanctions. WHO IS TANGSIRI? A naval brigade commander during the Iran-Iraq War, Tangsiri headed the IRGCN’s 1st Naval District in Bandar Abbas before becoming Fadavi’s deputy in 2010. He is known for his staunchly anti-American views and his vocal support for detaining Western naval personnel whose vessels stray into Iranian waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Foreign and Defense Policies
    Iran’s Foreign and Defense Policies Updated May 8, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44017 SUMMARY R44017 Iran’s Foreign and Defense Policies May 8, 2019 Iran’s national security policy is the product of many overlapping and sometimes competing factors such as the ideology of Iran’s Islamic revolution, perception of threats Kenneth Katzman to the regime and to the country, long-standing national interests, and the interaction of Specialist in Middle the Iranian regime’s factions and constituencies. Iran’s leadership: Eastern Affairs x Seeks to deter or thwart U.S. or other efforts to invade or intimidate Iran or to bring about a change of regime. x Has sought to take advantage of opportunities of regional conflicts to overturn a power structure in the Middle East that it asserts favors the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and other Sunni Muslim Arab regimes. x Seeks to enhance its international prestige and restore a sense of “greatness” reminiscent of ancient Persian empires. x Advances its foreign policy goals, in part by providing material support to regional allied governments and armed factions. Iranian officials characterize the support as helping the region’s “oppressed” and assert that Saudi Arabia, in particular, is instigating sectarian tensions and trying to exclude Iran from regional affairs. x Sometimes disagrees on tactics and strategies. Supreme Leader Ali Khamene’i and key hardline institutions, such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), oppose any compromises of Iran’s national security core goals. Iran’s elected president, Hassan Rouhani, and Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif support Iran’s integration into regional and international diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Full 8Chan Leak Dump As of April-15-2015 This Is a Quick Overview of Quick Leak
    Full 8chan Leak Dump As Of April-15-2015 This is a quick overview of Quick Leak http://8ch.net/leaked/index.html Anonymous Post Makes News Headline! KILLCEN 04/15/15 (Wed) 15:09:40 No.235[Repl y][Watch Thread] LoL! Hey Anonymous! You made news coverage! http://www.cbsnews.com/news/top-law-officials-personal-information-posted-online -right-wing-group-blamed/ DHS-CIA-FBI TRAITORS HOME ADDRESSES: http://quickleak.ir/xiUw8SIv Infowars also covers dox KILLCEN 04/15/15 (Wed) 15:19:3 2 No.236 Holly Molly! Infowars posts report about this too! (I'd l ay low if I were you, for a while) http://www.infowars.com/leaking-of-government-officials-ad dresses-accompanied-by-note-warning-of-fema-crackdown-by-nwo-satanists/ PREPARATION FOR MARTIAL LAW DOWNLOAD LINKS Anonymous 04/15/15 (Wed) 14:51:11 No .234[Reply][Watch Thread] CONCENTRATION CAMPS FOR AMERICANS FREE PDF DOWNLOAD Concentration Camps for Americans How would you like to enter one the over 600 American concentration camps acros s the USA? The barbed wired, shackle embedded camps have been built and are awaiti ng to enslave huge numbers of the population. Should a fitting event take place, current laws allow FEMA to legally incarcerate civilians into these camps. The Federal Government admits plans to detain millions of people Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a plan by the United States fede ral government to test their ability to detain large numbers of American citizens in case of massive civil unrest or national emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Question of Autonomous Weapons Systems
    MEDIMUN XIII Annual Session 2018 RESEARCH REPORT - [General Assembly 1] Mediterranean Model United Nations XIII 2018 Contents Topic 1: The question of contemporary international espionage 3 Topic 2: The Weaponization of National Resources ............. 7 Topic 3: The question of autonomous weapons systems ......... 10 Mediterranean Model United Nations XIII 2018 Topic 1: The question of contemporary international espionage Introduction • Contrary to common belief, espionage did not stop after the Cold War and is nothing like we see in Hollywood movies. In fact, this Lernaean Hydra of modern espionage has expanded, and its multiplying heads have taken many new forms. • The two tenacious “T”s have turned the world of espionage upside down in modern times: Technology and Terrorism. • Espionage is no longer limited to gathering information, but also involves transmission of false/biased information for political gain, sabotage of weapons and military plans and damaging of a country’s main pipelines (e.g. power, transport and communication) • In the 21st Century, espionage and cyber warfare have merged into one single, powerful weapon Definition of Key Terms • Espionage: Gathering of information using spies • Cyber-espionage: the use of computer networks to gain illicit access to confidential information, typically that held by a government or other organization. • SIGINT: Signals Intelligence • HUMINT: Covert intelligence-gathering by agents. • STUXNET: A malicious computer worm that was used for espionage • Operation Olympic games: One of the first uses of offensive cyber weapons. A covert and still unacknowledged campaign of sabotage by means of cyber disruption, directed at Iranian nuclear facilities by the United States and likely Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of South Africa's Foreign Policy Strategy In
    DETERMINANTS OF SOUTH AFRICA’S FOREIGN POLICY STRATEGY IN CYBER SPACE LAURENCE CAROMBA, MONASH SOUTH AFRICA 9 MAY, 2009: SOUTH AFRICA Jacob Zuma is inaugurated as the new president of South Africa 1 APRIL, 2009: IRAN The computer worm Stuxnet is deployed and begins to silently penetrate the Iranian nuclear programme 2007 2013 2015 2017 “Operation Edward “Spy Cables” “MasterDeeds” Orchard”; Snowden published data breech Israeli strike revelations on Syria 2007 2008 2012 2016 Cyber Conficker US role in DNC emails attacks on worm creating leaked on Estonia begins Stuxnet is WikiLeaks infections leaked 2009 2012 2014 2015 2017 Jacob Zuma NCSPF SA supports Cybercrime Cybercrime becomes SA approved Brazil at Net- Bill (v.1) Bill (v.2) 2017 president by cabinet MUNDIAL Cyril conference 2016 Ramaphosa SA votes against becomes ANC internet freedom president 2007 2013 2015 2017 “Operation Edward “Spy Cables” “MasterDeeds” Orchard”; Snowden published data breech Israeli strike revelations on Syria 2007 2008 2012 2016 Cyber Conficker US role in DNC emails attacks on worm creating leaked on Estonia begins Stuxnet is WikiLeaks infections leaked 2009 2012 2014 2015 2017 Jacob Zuma NCSPF SA supports Cybercrime Cybercrime becomes SA approved Brazil at Net- Bill (v.1) Bill (v.2) 2017 president by cabinet MUNDIAL Cyril conference 2016 Ramaphosa SA votes against becomes ANC internet freedom president WHAT I’D LIKE TO DO TODAY 1. Provide a framework for understanding the issue 2. Describe South Africa’s foreign policy in cyber space 3. Explain why South Africa has made the choices it has 1. PROVIDING A FRAMEWORK IN SOME RESPECTS, ALL STATES WANT TO ACHIEVE THE SAME THINGS… 1.
    [Show full text]
  • New Economic Sanctions on Iran: More Sound Than Fury
    New Economic Sanctions on Iran: More Sound than Fury By John B. Reynolds, Jeanine P. McGuinness, Will Schisa & Brooklynn Moore on June 25, 2019 POSTED IN ECONOMIC SANCTIONS, EXECUTIVE ORDER, OFAC On June 24, 2019, President Trump signed an Executive Order (“EO” or “Order”) imposing new economic sanctions on the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the Iranian Supreme Leader’s Office. The EO blocks all of the Supreme Leader’s property and interests in property in the United States, that come within the United States, or come within the possession or control of any United States person, and provides that such property may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in. The EO also authorizes the Secretary of Treasury to designate additional Iranian officials for blocking. It also authorizes the imposition of secondary sanctions on foreign financial institutions determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to have knowingly conducted or facilitated any significant financial transaction for or on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the Order. In an action coordinated with the issuance of the EO, Secretary Mnuchin announced the designation by OFAC of the following senior military leaders pursuant to Executive Order 13224: Alireza Tangsiri, Commander of the Navy of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (also known as the “IRGC”), for his role in threatening to close the Strait of Hormuz; Amir Ali Hajizadeh, Commander of the Aerospace Force of the IRGC, for his role in downing a U.S. unmanned aircraft in international airspace; and General Mohammad Pakpour, Brigadier-General and Commander of the IRGC, for his role as leader of IRGC ground forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Sweeps Through Forests, Protected Areas
    WWW.TEHRANTIMES.COM I N T E R N A T I O N A L D A I L Y 12 Pages Price 50,000 Rials 1.00 EURO 4.00 AED 42nd year No.13677 Monday JUNE 1, 2020 Khordad 12, 1399 Shawwal 9, 1441 Last Iranian fuel Khorasan Razavi Davoud Azizi Persian sci-fi “Monster Hunt” tanker reaches exports $11.1m elected as Iran on capture of U.S. RQ-170 spy Venezuelan waters 2 of handicrafts 8 tennis chief 11 drone by Iran published 12 Parliament believes talks with U.S. See pages 6- 10 are ‘harmful’, says speaker TEHRAN — Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, address to the parliament after he was the newly-elected parliament speaker says elected as a speaker on Thursday. talks and compromise with the United “Our strategy in dealing with terrorist States are harmful to the country. America is to complete the chain of revenge “The 11th Parliament considers anti-ar- for the blood of martyr Soleimani,” he said, rogance as both an ideological doctrine adding, “The work, which began with the and as a strategic interest. Negotiations unprecedented attack on Ain al-Asad base and compromise with the United States, and continued with the defeat of the U.S.’s as the axis of global arrogance, are con- empty grandeur in its inability to respond sidered fruitless and harmful,” he said to the Islamic Republic’s measure, will be See page 4 while addressing an open session of the completed with the expulsion of the U.S. parliament on Sunday. This was his first terrorist forces from the region.” 3 Photographer Mohammad Rezai snaps pics of volunteers helping fight coronavirus TEHRAN — Photographer Mohammad went through difficult days, to record the Rezai has made his best efforts to record initial experiences and show reactions of the the COVID-19 pandemic at the very be- people during the pandemic,” Rezai said.
    [Show full text]
  • The Downing of Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 Factual Analysis
    THE DOWNING OF UKRAINE INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES FLIGHT 752 FACTUAL ANALYSIS FORENSIC EXAMINATION AND ASSESSMENT TEAM JUNE 24, 2021 Global Affairs Canada 125 Sussex Drive Ottawa ON K1A 0G2 Canada Telephone: 1-800-267-8376 (toll-free in Canada) 613-944-4000 (in the National Capital Region and outside Canada) If you are deaf or hard of hearing, or if you have a speech impediment and use a text telephone, you can access the TTY service from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern Time by calling 613-944-9136 (in Canada only). Fax: 613-996-9709 Website: www.international.gc.ca Email: [email protected] Paper: FR5-180/2021 978-0-660-39047-5 PDF: FR5-180/2021E-PDF 978-0-660-39045-1 Printed in Canada © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2021 Cette publication est aussi disponible en français sous le titre Tragédie du vol 752 D’Ukraine International Airlines Analyse des faits DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF THOSE WHO LOST THEIR LIVES ON FLIGHT PS752 LIVES LOST Flight PS752 Passenger List Abaspourqadi, Mohammad Falsafi, Faraz Abbasnezhad, Mojtaba Farzaneh, Aida Abtahiforoushani, Seyedmehran Feghahati, Shakiba Aghabali, Iman Foroutan, Marzieh Agha Miri, Maryam Ghaderpanah, Iman Ahmadi, Motahereh Ghaderpanah, Parinaz Ahmadi, Muh Sen Ghafouri Azar, Siavash Ahmadi, Rahmtin Ghandchi, Daniel Ahmadi, Sekinhe Ghandchi, Dorsa Ahmady, Mitra Ghasemi Ariani, Milad Amirliravi, Mahsa Ghasemi Dastjerdi, Fatemeh Arasteh, Fareed Ghassemi, Amirhossein Arbabbahrami, Arshia Ghassemi, Kiana Arsalani, Evin Ghavi, Mandieh Asadi Lari, Mohammadhossein Ghavi, Masoumeh Asadi Lari,
    [Show full text]