Regional Biodiversity and Action Plan of the South-East Planning Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Biodiversity and Action Plan of the South-East Planning Region Regional Biodiversity and Action Plan of the South-East planning region “Common plans for biodiversity conservation and sustainable targets for the development of a bilateral network of protected areas - COMBINE2PROTECT” Project co-funded by the European Union and national funds of the participating countries 2020 Implementer: Centrefor Development of South-East Planning Region The Regional Biodiversity Strategy with Action Plan of the South-East Planning Region is realized within the project ‘'Common plans for biodiversity conservation and sustainable targets for the development of a bilateral network of protected areas - COMBINE2PROTECT” within the INTERREG IPA CBC Programme between Greece and Republic of North Macedonia. The project is co-financed by the European Union and the National Funds of the participating countries The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union, the participating countries and the Managing Authority. CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE .............................................................................. 8 1.2. GLOBAL AND NATIONAL STRATEGIC APPROACH TO PRESERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ........ 8 1.2.1. NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR BOLOGICAL DIVERSITY – OVERVIEW OF THE SOUTH EAST PLANNING REGION ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2. 2050 THE VISION OF ‘’LIVING IN HARMONY WITH NATURE’’ – AFTER 2020 - GLOBAL STRATEGIC PLAN FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ..................................................................................... 9 1.2.3. „CLIMATE NEUTRAL EU“ – STRATIGIC PLAN FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY PROTECTION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 2021-2030 2. METHODOLOGY OF PREPARATION OF THE STRATEGY ........................................................................... 10 3. BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOUTH EAST REGION ......................................................................... 12 3.1. NATURAL GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOUTH-EAST REGION ............................. 12 3.1.1. GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION ................................................................................................ 12 3.1.2. BORDERS ............................................................................................................................ 14 3.1.3. TERITORY SIZE AND ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION ..................................................... 15 3.1.4. RELIEF ................................................................................................................................. 17 3.1.5. CLIMATE ............................................................................................................................. 36 3.1.6. HYDROGRAPHY ................................................................................................................... 40 3.1.7. PEDOLOGICAL COMPOSITION ............................................................................................ 52 3.2. SOCIO-GEOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF THE REGION ........................................................................ 54 3.2.1. POPULATION ...................................................................................................................... 54 3.2.2.SETTLEMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 58 3.3. ECONOMIC-GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS .......................................................................... 64 4. BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ........................................................................................................................... 69 4.1 SPECIES DIVERSITY ........................................................................................................................ 70 4.1.1. ALGAE DIVERSITY ................................................................................................................ 70 4.1.2. FUNGI DIVERSITY ................................................................................................................ 72 4.1.3. PLANT DIVERSITY ................................................................................................................ 74 4.1.4. DIVERSITY OF FAUNA ......................................................................................................... 78 4.2. ECOSYSTEM DIVERSITY .............................................................................................................. 111 4.2.1. Habitat types .................................................................................................................... 111 4.3. AGROBIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ..................................................................................................... 145 4.3.1. Plant agrobiological diversity ........................................................................................... 145 4.3.2. Biodiversity in domestic animals ...................................................................................... 148 LOSS OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ............................................................................................................... 157 5.1. Major threats to biodiversity and recommendations for biodiversity protection .................... 157 5.1.1 Algae .................................................................................................................................. 157 5.1.2 Fungi .................................................................................................................................. 158 5.1.3 Plants ................................................................................................................................. 159 5.1.4 Invertebrates ..................................................................................................................... 162 5.2. Key sectors affecting the biological diversity ............................................................................. 174 5.2.1. Hunting ............................................................................................................................. 174 5.2.2. Invasive, allochthonous and genetic modified organisms ............................................... 175 5.2.2.1. Algae– allochthonous and invasive species .................................................................. 176 5.2.2.2. Fungi – allochthonous and invasive species .................................................................. 176 5.2.2.3. Plants – allochthonous and invasive species................................................................. 176 5.2.2.4. Aquatic invertebrates - allochthonous and invasive species ........................................ 176 5.2.2.5. Terrestrial invertebrates – allochthonous and invasive species ................................... 177 5.2.2.6. Fish species - allochthonous and invasive species ........................................................ 178 5.2.2.7. Amphibia and reptiles – allochthonous and invasive species ....................................... 180 5.2.2.8. Mammals – allochthonous and invasive species .......................................................... 180 5.2.2.9. Agrobiological diversity – disappearance of autochthonous varieties ......................... 181 5.2.3. Climate change and desertification ........................................................................................ 182 6. VALORISATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ........................................................................................... 182 6.1 Endemic, rare, threatened and extinct species .......................................................................... 185 6.1.1. Algae – endemic, rare, threatened and extinct species ................................................... 185 6.1.2. Fungi - endemic, rare, threatened and extinct species .................................................... 185 6.1.3. Plants - endemic, rare, threatened and extinct species ................................................... 186 6.1.4. Aquatic invertebrates - endemic, rare, threatened and extinct species ......................... 186 6.1.5. Terrestrial invertebrates - endemic, rare, threatened and extinct species ..................... 188 6.1.6. Amphibians and reptiles - endemic, rare, threatened and extinct species ..................... 188 6.1.7. Birds- endemic, rare, threatened and extinct species ..................................................... 189 6.1.8. Mammals - endemic, rare, threatened and extinct species ............................................ 189 6.2. Protected Areas ......................................................................................................................... 192 6.2.1. National Network on Protected Areas ............................................................................. 192 6.2.2. International protected and proclaimed areas ................................................................ 195 6.3. Ecological Networks ........................................................................................................................... 197 7. MONITORING ........................................................................................................................................ 198 7.1. Biodiversity monitoring.............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • USF Board of Trustees ( March 7, 2013)
    Agenda item: (to be completed by Board staff) USF Board of Trustees ( March 7, 2013) Issue: Proposed Ph.D. in Integrative Biology ________________________________________________________________ Proposed action: New Degree Program Approval ________________________________________________________________ Background information: This application for a new Ph.D is driven by a recent reorganization of the Department of Biology. The reorganization began in 2006 and was completed in 2009. The reorganization of the Department of Biology, in part, reflected the enormity of the biological sciences, and in part, different research perspectives and directions taken by the faculty in each of the respective areas of biology. Part of the reorganization was to replace the original Ph.D. in Biology with two new doctoral degrees that better serve the needs of the State and our current graduate students by enabling greater focus of the research performed to earn the Ph.D. The well-established and highly productive faculty attracts students to the Tampa Campus from all over the United States as well as from foreign countries. The resources to support the two Ph.D. programs have already been established in the Department of Biology and are sufficient to support the two new degree programs. The reorganization created two new departments; the Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology (CMMB) and the Department of Integrative Biology (IB). This proposal addresses the creation of a new Ph.D., in Integrative Biology offered by the Department of Integrative Biology (CIP Code 26.1399). The name of the Department, Integrative Biology, reflects the belief that the study of biological processes and systems can best be accomplished by the incorporation of numerous integrated approaches Strategic Goal(s) Item Supports: The proposed program directly supports the following: Goal 1 and Goal 2 Workgroup Review: ACE March 7, 2013 Supporting Documentation: See Complete Proposal below Prepared by: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Design a Database of Italian Vascular Alimurgic Flora (Alimurgita): Preliminary Results
    plants Article Design a Database of Italian Vascular Alimurgic Flora (AlimurgITA): Preliminary Results Bruno Paura 1,*, Piera Di Marzio 2 , Giovanni Salerno 3, Elisabetta Brugiapaglia 1 and Annarita Bufano 1 1 Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; [email protected] (E.B.); [email protected] (A.B.) 2 Department of Bioscience and Territory, University of Molise, 86090 Pesche, Italy; [email protected] 3 Graduate Department of Environmental Biology, University “La Sapienza”, 00100 Roma, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Despite the large number of data published in Italy on WEPs, there is no database providing a complete knowledge framework. Hence the need to design a database of the Italian alimurgic flora: AlimurgITA. Only strictly alimurgic taxa were chosen, excluding casual alien and cultivated ones. The collected data come from an archive of 358 texts (books and scientific articles) from 1918 to date, chosen with appropriate criteria. For each taxon, the part of the plant used, the method of use, the chorotype, the biological form and the regional distribution in Italy were considered. The 1103 taxa of edible flora already entered in the database equal 13.09% of Italian flora. The most widespread family is that of the Asteraceae (20.22%); the most widely used taxa are Cichorium intybus and Borago officinalis. The not homogeneous regional distribution of WEPs (maximum in the south and minimum in the north) has been interpreted. Texts published reached its peak during the 2001–2010 decade. A database for Italian WEPs is important to have a synthesis and to represent the richness and Citation: Paura, B.; Di Marzio, P.; complexity of this knowledge, also in light of its potential for cultural enhancement, as well as its Salerno, G.; Brugiapaglia, E.; Bufano, applications for the agri-food system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters: South-Eastern Europe
    The Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters: South-Eastern Europe Annukka Lipponen Environmental Affairs Officer, UNECE Coordinator of the Second Assessment Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Background • SEE assessment was presented to the MoP-5 (2009) which endorsed it • Revisions presented to WGMA-11 in July 2010 (document ECE/MP.WAT/WG.2/2010/3, see Water Convention web site); now incorporated • Additional revisions came in after WGMA- 11 Substantial changes: Black Sea • RS added information to the reservoirs Iron Gates I and II • Rezvaya (Rezovska) River Basin added, information from BG, TR • Landuse/land cover, pressures (sand and gravel abstraction from Struma/Strymonas river, flow reduction on Mesta/Nestos), transboundary cooperation (1995 agreement with Greece), measures taken – BG • Evros/Meriç aquifer • Drava & Mura: information on the HU part added, basin areas revised Substantial changes: Mediterranean • Characteristics of the shared water bodies – Lake Prespa, L. Ohrid, Drin, L. Skadar/Shkoder, Buna/Bojana, changes to selected figures - Society for the Protection of Prespa • Bileća Reservoir/ Bilećko Lake assessment added based on information from BA • Topolovgrad Massif & Vidlic/Nishava aquifer complemented, BG Some bilateral agreements added – Croatia-Hungary on the Danube, Dráva and Mura (1995) – Greece and Υugoslavia concerning Axios/Vardar, Doiran Lake, Prespa Lake (1959) – Albania-FYROM-Greece on the Prespa Lake (2010) – Romania-Hungary
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Methodology and Protocols for 20 Habitats, 20 Species and 20 Birds
    1 Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Finland Monitoring methodology and protocols for 20 habitats, 20 species and 20 birds Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 Strengthening the capacities for effective implementation of the acquis in the field of nature protection Report D 3.1. - 1. 7.11.2019 Funded by the European Union The Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Department of Nature, Republic of North Macedonia Metsähallitus (Parks and Wildlife Finland), Finland The State Service for Protected Areas (SSPA), Lithuania 2 This project is funded by the European Union This document has been produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 and and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary 6 Overview 8 Establishment of Natura 2000 network and the process of site selection .............................................................. 9 Preparation of reference lists for the species and habitats ..................................................................................... 9 Needs for data .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Protocols for the monitoring of birds ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Two Cases of Melanism in the Ring-Headed Dwarf Snake Eirenis Modestus (Martin, 1838) from Kastellorizo, Greece (Serpentes: Colubridae)
    Herpetology Notes, volume 11: 175-178 (2018) (published online on 20 February 2018) Two cases of melanism in the Ring-headed Dwarf Snake Eirenis modestus (Martin, 1838) from Kastellorizo, Greece (Serpentes: Colubridae) Konstantinos Kalaentzis1,*, Christos Kazilas1 and Ilias Strachinis1 Pigmentation serves a protective role in many 2016). A possible adaptive hypothesis for melanism in animals, including snakes, whether it functions in snakes is protection against sun damage (Lorioux et al., camouflage, warning, mimicry, or thermoregulation 2008; Jablonski and Kautman, 2017). (Bechtel, 1978; Krecsák, 2008). The observable The Ring-headed Dwarf Snake, Eirenis modestus colouration and pattern of a snake is the result of the (Martin, 1838), is a medium-sized colubrid snake presence of variously coloured pigments in specific reaching a maximum total length of 70 cm (Çiçek and places in the skin (Bechtel, 1978). Four different types Mermer, 2007). The Dwarf Snake inhabits rocky areas of pigment-bearing cells called chromatophores can with sparse vegetation and often hides under stones, be found in the skin of reptiles, namely melanophores, where it feeds mainly on terrestrial arthropods (Çiçek iridophores, erythrophores, and xanthophores (Bechtel, and Mermer, 2007). It is widely distributed (Fig. 1), 1978). Abnormalities in the pigment formation or the occurring mainly in the Caucasus (Armenia, southern interaction between the different types of pigment may Azerbaijan, eastern Georgia, southern Russia), Greece result in various chromatic disorders, which cause (on the islands of Alatonissi, Chios, Fournoi, Kalymnos, abnormal colouration of the skin and its derivatives Kastellorizo, Leros, Lesvos, Samiopoula, Samos, (Rook et al., 1998). There are many literature reports and Symi), northwestern Iran, and Turkey (Çiçek and describing chromatic anomalies in snakes, of which Mermer, 2007; Mahlow et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofaunistic Diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic)
    University of Sopron Roth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences Ph.D. thesis Herpetofaunistic diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic) Tamás Tóth Sopron 2018 Roth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences Nature Conservation Program Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Faragó Sándor Dr. Gál János Introduction In recent years the Croatian islands, especially those of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago became the focus of research of herpetologists. However, in spite of a long interest encompassing more than a hundred years, numerous gaps remain in our herpetological knowledge. For this reason, the author wished to contribute to a better understanding by performing studies outlined below. Aims The first task was to map the distribution of amphibians and reptiles inhabiting the archipelago as data were lacking for several of the smaller islands and also the fauna of the bigger islands was insufficiently known. Subsequently, the faunistic information derived from the scientific literature and field surveys conducted by the author as well as available geological and paleogeological data were compared and analysed from a zoogeographic point of view. The author wished to identify regions of the islands boasting the greatest herpetofaunal diversity by creating dot maps based on collecting localities. To answer the question which snake species and which individuals are going to be a victim of the traffic snake roadkill and literature survey were used. The author also identified where are the areas where the most snakes are hit by a vehicle on Cres. By gathering road-killed snakes and comparing their locality data with published occurrences the author seeked to identify species most vulnerable to vehicular traffic and road sections posing the greatest threat to snakes on Cres Island.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Biology of Tortoises
    The Conservation Biology of Tortoises Edited by Ian R. Swingland and Michael W. Klemens IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group and The Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) No. 5 IUCN—The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC 3. To cooperate with the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the in developing and evaluating a data base on the status of and trade in wild scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biological flora and fauna, and to provide policy guidance to WCMC. diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species of 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their con- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna servation, and for the management of other species of conservation concern. and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, sub- vation of species or biological diversity. species, and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintain- 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: ing biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and vulnerable species. • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of biological diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conserva- tion Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitor- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Species of Wood-Decaying Fungi in <I>Polyporales</I> New to China
    MYCOTAXON ISSN (print) 0093-4666 (online) 2154-8889 Mycotaxon, Ltd. ©2017 January–March 2017—Volume 132, pp. 29–42 http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/132.29 Three species of wood-decaying fungi in Polyporales new to China Chang-lin Zhaoa, Shi-liang Liua, Guang-juan Ren, Xiao-hong Ji & Shuanghui He* Institute of Microbiology, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35 Qinghuadong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, P.R. China * Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract—Three wood-decaying fungi, Ceriporiopsis lagerheimii, Sebipora aquosa, and Tyromyces xuchilensis, are newly recorded in China. The identifications were based on morphological and molecular evidence. The phylogenetic tree inferred from ITS+nLSU sequences of 49 species of Polyporales nests C. lagerheimii within the phlebioid clade, S. aquosa within the gelatoporia clade, and T. xuchilensis within the residual polyporoid clade. The three species are described and illustrated based on Chinese material. Key words—Basidiomycota, polypore, taxonomy, white rot fungus Introduction Wood-decaying fungi play a key role in recycling nutrients of forest ecosystems by decomposing cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin of the plant cell walls (Floudas et al. 2015). Polyporales, a large order in Basidiomycota, includes many important genera of wood-decaying fungi. Recent molecular studies employing multi-gene datasets have helped to provide a phylogenetic overview of Polyporales, in which thirty-four valid families are now recognized (Binder et al. 2013). The diversity of wood-decaying fungi is very high in China because of the large landscape ranging from boreal to tropical zones. More than 1200 species of wood-decaying fungi have been found in China (Dai 2011, 2012), and some a Chang-lin Zhao and Shi-liang Liu contributed equally to this work and share first-author status 30 ..
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Overview of the Antrodia Clade (Basidiomycota, Polyporales)
    Mycologia, 105(6), 2013, pp. 1391–1411. DOI: 10.3852/13-051 # 2013 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 A phylogenetic overview of the antrodia clade (Basidiomycota, Polyporales) Beatriz Ortiz-Santana1 phylogenetic studies also have recognized the genera Daniel L. Lindner Amylocystis, Dacryobolus, Melanoporia, Pycnoporellus, US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Center for Sarcoporia and Wolfiporia as part of the antrodia clade Forest Mycology Research, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, (SY Kim and Jung 2000, 2001; Binder and Hibbett Madison, Wisconsin 53726 2002; Hibbett and Binder 2002; SY Kim et al. 2003; Otto Miettinen Binder et al. 2005), while the genera Antrodia, Botanical Museum, University of Helsinki, PO Box 7, Daedalea, Fomitopsis, Laetiporus and Sparassis have 00014, Helsinki, Finland received attention in regard to species delimitation (SY Kim et al. 2001, 2003; KM Kim et al. 2005, 2007; Alfredo Justo Desjardin et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2004; Wu et al. 2004; David S. Hibbett Dai et al. 2006; Blanco-Dios et al. 2006; Chiu 2007; Clark University, Biology Department, 950 Main Street, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610 Lindner and Banik 2008; Yu et al. 2010; Banik et al. 2010, 2012; Garcia-Sandoval et al. 2011; Lindner et al. 2011; Rajchenberg et al. 2011; Zhou and Wei 2012; Abstract: Phylogenetic relationships among mem- Bernicchia et al. 2012; Spirin et al. 2012, 2013). These bers of the antrodia clade were investigated with studies also established that some of the genera are molecular data from two nuclear ribosomal DNA not monophyletic and several modifications have regions, LSU and ITS. A total of 123 species been proposed: the segregation of Antrodia s.l.
    [Show full text]
  • (Heteroptera) Der Perchtoldsdorfer Heide (Niederösterreich). 55-74 Beiträge Zur Entomofaunistik 13 55-74 Wien, Dezember 2012
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Beiträge zur Entomofaunistik Jahr/Year: 2012 Band/Volume: 13 Autor(en)/Author(s): Rabitsch Wolfgang Artikel/Article: Die Wanzenfauna (Heteroptera) der Perchtoldsdorfer Heide (Niederösterreich). 55-74 Beiträge zur Entomofaunistik 13 55-74 Wien, Dezember 2012 Die Wanzenfauna (Heteroptera) der Perchtoldsdorfer Heide (Niederösterreich) Wolfgang Rabitsch* Abstract The true bug fauna (Heteroptera) of the Perchtoldsdorfer Heide (Lower Austria). The Perchtoldsdorfer Heide is the largest semidry grassland patch along the Thermenlinie in Lower Austria. The recent sur- vey of the true bug fauna (Insecta: Heteroptera) revealed 196 species. Further 23 species are known from historic records, adding to 219 known true bug species in the area, including 22 red list species. The plant bug Phytocoris reuteri is recorded for Lower Austria for the first time with certainty and the seed bug Acompus pallipes is recorded for the first time since more than 50 years. The species-rich and diverse true bug community mainly consists of thermophilous species of dry grassland habitats and mesophilous species of forest edge habitats. Compared to the grassland, the forests and forest edges of the area were not surveyed in detail and may add further species to the list. Keywords: Insecta, Heteroptera, Lower Austria, faunistics Zusammenfassung Die Perchtoldsdorfer Heide ist die größte zusammenhängende Halbtrockenrasenfläche an der Thermenlinie in Niederösterreich. Die aktuelle Untersuchung der Wanzenfauna erbrachte Nachweise für 196 Arten. Für weitere 23 Arten liegen historische Nachweise vor, womit insgesamt bisher 219 Wanzenarten im Untersuchungsgebiet dokumentiert sind, darunter 22 Arten der Roten Liste. Die Weichwanze Phytocoris reuteri wird erstmals mit Sicherheit und die Bodenwanze Acompus pallipes wird erstmals nach über 50 Jahren wieder für Niederösterreich gemeldet.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Sector
    Transport Sector Section 1 On-going projects (in implementation phase) Project duration Nr. Project title Total investment Grant/ Loan/ National Co- Project brief description (location included) (preparation+ (sector included) cost Source Source financimg implementation TRANSPORT Construction of motorway Kicevo- 598.000.000 EXIM 1. The length of the road is 57 km and is part of Corridor VIII. 2014-2023 PESR Ohrid € bank Construction of express road Stip- 2. The road section is in a length of 23.5 km. 2018-2021 45.020.000 € EBRD Radovis Construction of express road Stip- 3. The road section is divided in two sections with total length of 28 km. 2017-2021 51.000.000 € EBRD Krupiste-Kocani 15% Construction of the road section Construction of an express road in a total length of 15.5 km as part of branch X-D of IPA II 4. 2018-2022 28.000.000 € National Drenovo-Interchange Gradsko Corridor X (85%) budget Construction of express road Raec Construction of an express road in a total length of 10 km as part of branch X-D of 5. 2016-2022 45.000.000 € EBRD bridge-Drenovo (Faris gorge- Corridor X (Contract is terminated in September 2019) ConstructionDrenovo of gorge)express way 6. Kumanovo – border with Bulgaria The total length of the section is 23 km. 2018-2022 63.500.000 € WB (section Rankovci – Kriva Palanka) Rehabilitation of regional road 7. The road is with total length is 3.30 km. 2017-2019 1.113.000€ PESR Matejce – Lipkovo Construction of a bridge near Konjare 8. A bridge is being constructed over the river Pcinja.
    [Show full text]
  • TELOPEA Publication Date: 13 October 1983 Til
    Volume 2(4): 425–452 TELOPEA Publication Date: 13 October 1983 Til. Ro)'al BOTANIC GARDENS dx.doi.org/10.7751/telopea19834408 Journal of Plant Systematics 6 DOPII(liPi Tmst plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea • escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL· ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) • ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) Telopea 2(4): 425-452, Fig. 1 (1983) 425 CURRENT ANATOMICAL RESEARCH IN LILIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE AND IRIDACEAE* D.F. CUTLER AND MARY GREGORY (Accepted for publication 20.9.1982) ABSTRACT Cutler, D.F. and Gregory, Mary (Jodrell(Jodrel/ Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, England) 1983. Current anatomical research in Liliaceae, Amaryllidaceae and Iridaceae. Telopea 2(4): 425-452, Fig.1-An annotated bibliography is presented covering literature over the period 1968 to date. Recent research is described and areas of future work are discussed. INTRODUCTION In this article, the literature for the past twelve or so years is recorded on the anatomy of Liliaceae, AmarylIidaceae and Iridaceae and the smaller, related families, Alliaceae, Haemodoraceae, Hypoxidaceae, Ruscaceae, Smilacaceae and Trilliaceae. Subjects covered range from embryology, vegetative and floral anatomy to seed anatomy. A format is used in which references are arranged alphabetically, numbered and annotated, so that the reader can rapidly obtain an idea of the range and contents of papers on subjects of particular interest to him. The main research trends have been identified, classified, and check lists compiled for the major headings. Current systematic anatomy on the 'Anatomy of the Monocotyledons' series is reported. Comment is made on areas of research which might prove to be of future significance.
    [Show full text]