DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis of the Effects of Anti-Corruption Policies in Montenegro and Recommendations for Their Improvement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis of the Effects of Anti-Corruption Policies in Montenegro and Recommendations for Their Improvement View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Policy Documentation Center “EUROBLOK” COALITION “STRENGTHENING CIVIL SOCIETY CAPACITIES TO CONTRIBUTE TO PROJECT: THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND ACCESSION PROCESS” EUR BLOK ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICIES Jačanje kapaciteta civilnog društva za doprinos EU integracijama i procesu pristupanja IN MONTENEGRO Strengthening the civil society capacity to contribute to EU integration and the accession process and Recommendations for Their Improvement Report 2011 The project is co-funded by European Union and managed by Delegation of European Union to Montenegro. This study has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of the document are the sole responsibility of CEMI and can under no circumstances be reagrded as reflecting the position of the European Union” This project has been financially supported by the European Union. This study has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of the document are the sole responsibility of EMIM and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. “EUROBLOK” COALITION PROJECT: “STRENGTHENING CIVIL SOCIETY CAPACITIES TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND ACCESSION PROCESS” Analysis OF THE EFFects of Anti-corruption policies in Montenegro and Recommendations for Their Improvement Report 2011 This study has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of the document are the sole responsibility of The Monitoring Center CEMI and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. Analysis of the Effects of Anti-corruption Policies in Montenegro and Recommendations for Their Improvement Report 2011 Publisher: CeMI Beogradska 32 81 000 Podgorica e-mail: [email protected] www.cemi.org.me For publisher: Authors:Zlatko Vujović NikoletaAna Selić Tomovic VladoDragan Dedovic Bojović Zlatko Vujovic Translation:Mensur Bajramspahić Printing:Mensur Bajramspahić Studio Mouse - Podgorica Copies: 200 kom Translation of all studies produced within the project “Strengthening of the capacities of civil society to Brit- ish Embassy Podgorica. contribute to the European integration and accession process” has been financially supported by the The public policy study: „Analysis of the Effects of Anti-corruption Policies in Montenegro and Recom- mendations for Their Improvement“, has been prepared within the project “Strengthening the Capacity of Civil Society in Contribution to European Integration and the Accession Process”. The project has been implemented by the European Movement in Montenegro, in cooperation with the Monitoring Center CEMI and the Institute Alternative, with the support by the Delegation of the European Union in Montenegro. Disclaimer: The views herein expressed are solely those of the author and contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of European Union. Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................3 Part I: Political Corruption .........................................................................................................4 Montenegro ...........................................................................................................................................4 1.1 1.1.1Parliament’s Legal framework oversight...................................................................................................................... role in the process of fight against corruption in 5 1.1.2 Implementation .......................................................................................................................7 1.1.3 Conclusions and recommendations ................................................................................8 1.2 Financing of Political Parties .........................................................................................................9 1.2.1 Legal framework................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Implementation .................................................................................................................... 12 1.2.3 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................13 ............................................................................................. 14 1.3.1 Legal Framework ................................................................................................................. 15 1.3 1.3.2Prevention Implementation of Conflict ....................................................................................................................of Interest 15 1.3.3 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................17 Part 2. Economic corruption ................................................................................................... 20 .................................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.1 Legal framework................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 2.1.2Public Implementation finance ................................................................................................................... 23 2.1.3 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................27 2.2. State property .................................................................................................................................. 30 2.2.1 Legal framework................................................................................................................... 30 2.2.2 Implementation .................................................................................................................... 31 2.2.3 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................34 2.3 Public Procurement ....................................................................................................................... 35 2.3.1 Legal framework................................................................................................................... 36 2.3.2 Institutional framework ....................................................................................................36 2.3.3 Implementation .................................................................................................................... 38 2.3.4 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................39 2.4 The Capital Market ......................................................................................................................... 41 2.4.1 Legal framework................................................................................................................... 41 2.4.2 Institutional framework ....................................................................................................42 2.4.3 Implementation .................................................................................................................... 43 2.4.4. Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................44 Part 3. Preventive mechanisms – integrity and transparency ..................................... 46 3.1 Prevention of corruption ............................................................................................................. 46 3.1.1 Legal Framework ................................................................................................................. 47 3.1.2 Implementation .................................................................................................................... 49 3.1.3 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................51 3.2 Integrity and the prevention of corruption .........................................................................54 3.2.1. Implementation ...................................................................................................................55 3.2.2 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................56 3.3. Protection of whistleblowers ....................................................................................................56 3.3.1 Legal framework................................................................................................................... 57 3.3.2 Implementation .................................................................................................................... 59 3.3.3 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................60 3.4 Free Access to Information .........................................................................................................62 3.4.1 Legal framework................................................................................................................... 62 3.4.2 Implementation ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of the National Integrity System of Montenegro
    ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO This project is supported by the European Union. The content of this does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the report lies entirely with the author ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO Title: ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO Publisher: Network for affirmation of NGO sector - MANS Monitoring and Analytic Programme Authors: Vanja Ćalović, Executive Director Vuk Maraš, Monitoring and Analytic Programme Director Aleksandar Maškovic, Analytic Programme Coordinator Veselin Radulovic, MANS’ Legal Advisor Print: 3M - Makarije Edition: 30 copies Contact: Dalmatinska 188, Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: +382 20 266 326 Fax: +382 20 266 328 E-mail: [email protected] www.mans.co.me CONTENTS I INTRODUCTORY NOTE ........................................................................................................................... 7 II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 11 III ABOUT THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESMENT .............................................. 21 IV COUNTRY PROFILE OF MONTENEGRO ..................................................................................... 27 V CORRUPTION PROFILE ......................................................................................................................... 31 VI ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTIVITIES .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development Ofmonitoring Instruments Forjudicial and Law
    Background Research on Systems and Context on Systems Research Background Development of Monitoring Instruments for Judicial and Law Enforcement institutions in the Western Balkans Background Research on Systems and Context Justice and Home Affairs Statistics in the Western Balkans 2009 - 2011 CARDS Regional Action Programme With funding by the European Commission April 2010 Disclaimers This Report has not been formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC or contributory organizations and neither do they imply any endorsement. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNODC concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Comments on this report are welcome and can be sent to: Statistics and Survey Section United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime PO Box 500 1400 Vienna Austria Tel: (+43) 1 26060 5475 Fax: (+43) 1 26060 7 5475 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.unodc.org 1 Development of Monitoring Instruments for Judicial and Law Enforcement Institutions in the Western Balkans 2009-2011 Background Research on Systems and Context 2 Development of Monitoring Instruments for Judicial and Law Enforcement Institutions in the Western Balkans 2009-2011 Background Research on Systems and Context Justice and Home Affairs Statistics in the Western Balkans April 2010 3 Acknowledgements Funding for this report was provided by the European Commission under the CARDS 2006 Regional Action Programme. This report was produced under the responsibility of Statistics and Surveys Section (SASS) and Regional Programme Office for South Eastern Europe (RPOSEE) of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) based on research conducted by the European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control affiliated with the United Nations (HEUNI) and the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD).
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro: Overview of Political Corruption
    MONTENEGRO: OVERVIEW OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION QUERY SUMMARY Can you provide an overview of and background to Corruption remains one of the key challenges that recent measures taken to address political Montenegro faces in the process of its further corruption in Montenegro? democratisation. CONTENT In particular, abuse of public office and resources for private benefit and corruption within the political 1. Overview of political corruption in Montenegro parties and electoral processes are seen as some 2. Elections of the greatest challenges in the fight against political corruption in the country. 3. Party financing 4. Immunity In recent years, Montenegro has made progress in 5. Code of conduct for politicians strengthening its incomplete legislative framework 6. Conflict of interest rules around issues of political corruption. Laws on 7. Asset declaration rules political party financing, prevention of conflict of 8. References interest and asset declarations have been amended, and in 2013 the government also \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ adopted a new Action Plan for the Fight against Corruption and Organised Crime for 2013-2014. Author Samridhi Shukla, [email protected] However, implementation and enforcement of the Reviewer(s) laws on the ground continue to be weak. Entities Marie Chêne; Dieter Zinnbauer, PhD, Transparency that supervise the implementation of laws are either International not entirely independent or lack sufficient power and resources to sanction perpetrators, particularly in Date the case of senior public officials. 20 May 2014 © 2014 Transparency International. All rights reserved. This document should not be considered as representative of the Commission or Transparency International’s official position. Neither the European Commission, Transparency International nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in Montenegro: BRIBERY AS EXPERIENCED by the POPULATION
    Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org CORRUPTION IN MONTENEGRO BRIBERY AS EXPERIENCED BY THE POPULATION BRIBERY Corruption in Montenegro: BRIBERY AS EXPERIENCED BY THE POPULATION Co-fi nanced by the European Commission UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna CORRUPTION IN MONTENEGRO: BRIBERY AS EXPERIENCED BY THE POPULATION Copyright © 2011, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Acknowledgments This report was prepared by UNODC Statistics and Surveys Section (SASS) and Prism Research Research supervision and report preparation: Enrico Bisogno (SASS) Felix Reiterer (SASS) Michael Jandl (SASS) Serena Favarin (SASS) Philip Davis (SASS) Field research and data analysis: Dino Djipa (Prism Research) Adana Celik (Prism Research) Cover design: Suzanne Kunnen (STAS) Drafting and editing: Jonathan Gibbons Supervision: Sandeep Chawla (Director, Division of Policy Analysis and Public Affairs) Angela Me (Chief, SASS) The precious contribution of Milva Ekonomi for the development of survey methodology is gratefully acknowledged. This survey was conducted and this report prepared with the financial support of the European Commission and the Government of Norway. Sincere thanks are expressed to Roberta Cortese (European Commission) for her continued support. Disclaimers This report has not been formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC or contributory organizations and neither do they imply any endorsement. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of UNODC concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Publication
    CMIREPORT Corruption in Montenegro 2007: Overview over Main Problems and Status of Reforms Marijana Trivunovic Vera Devine Harald Mathisen R 2007: 9 Corruption in Montenegro 2007: Overview over Main Problems and Status of Reforms Marijana Trivunovic Vera Devine Harald Mathisen R 2007: 9 CMI Reports This series can be ordered from: Chr. Michelsen Institute P.O. Box 6033 Postterminalen, N-5892 Bergen, Norway Tel: + 47 55 57 40 00 Fax: + 47 55 57 41 66 E-mail: [email protected] www.cmi.no Price: NOK 90 ISSN 0805-505X ISBN 978-82-8062-208-2 This report is also available at: www.cmi.no/publications Indexing terms Corruption Montenegro Project number 27072 Project title Sida: Study of Corruption in Montenegro Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3. OVERVIEW AND CONTEXT ................................................................................................................. 13 3. 1 DATA, PERCEPTIONS, AND EXPERIENCE OF CORRUPTION....................................................................... 13 3.2 HISTORIC AND STRUCTURAL FACTORS.................................................................................................... 14 4. POLITICAL CORRUPTION...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Politicka Misao 4 5 2015.Indd
    Croatian Political Science Review, Vol. 52, No. 4-5, 2015, pp. 43-73 43 Original research article Received: 1 October 2015 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Rocky Road to Europe: brought to you by CORE Disciplining Croatia and Montenegro through the Accession Process SANJA HAJDINJAK Central European University Summary The article explores the Croatian and Montenegrin EU accession path as a two-sided disciplining process established through the negotiations. The “suc- cess” of the EU’s civilising mission in the two countries is determined through the feedback/dialogue relationship formed between the EU and the candidate country. I analyse two aspects of the accession negotiations: cooperation with the ICTY and the rule of law institutions. In Croatia, the domestic elites’ de- termination to ensure the membership paired up with the EU’s civilising mis- sion in the Balkans. In Montenegro, the EU membership has not outright re- presented the mythical return to Europe, hence initially self-civilising was not high on the list of the priorities. Moreover, Montenegro was the success story of the Balkans and the EU initially did not insist on the institutional de- velopment. The paper contributes to the wider EU enlargement literature by specifically emphasizing the cultural studies framework and by emphasizing the importance of the overlooked feedback/dialogue characteristics of the ac- cession process. Keywords: Croatia, Montenegro, European Union, Accession Process, Bal- kans Introduction This article explores the EU accession as a disciplining feedback/dialogue in two Western Balkan countries, Croatia and Montenegro. The argument is two-fold. Firstly, the EU’s subjective assessment of the countries’ institutional quality influ- ences the depth and scope of the civilizing mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure of Integrity
    RESEARCH REPORT PART 3 OF 4 INFRASTRUCTURE OF INTEGRITY Western Balkans anti-corruption pledges monitor UGLJEŠA UGI ZVEKIĆ AND SUNČANA ROKSANDIĆ MARCH 2021 THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF INTEGRITY SERIES CONSISTS OF: PART 1. Executive summary PART 2. Political economy of organized corruption and anti-corruption in the Western Balkans PART 3. Western Balkans anti-corruption pledges monitor PART 4. National assessments INFRASTRUCTURE OF INTEGRITY Western Balkans anti-corruption pledges monitor WW Uglješa Ugi Zvekić & Sunčana Roksandić March 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Walter Kemp and Kristina Amerhauser for their support. Special thanks to our national experts for their contribution, cooperation and support: Krisela Hackaj (Albania), Eldan Mujanović (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Mentor Vrajoli (Kosovo), Dejan Milovac (Montenegro), Slagjana Taseva (North Macedonia) and Miodrag Milosavljević (Serbia). This publication was produced with the financial support of the United Kingdom’s Conflict, Stability and Security Fund. Its contents are the sole responsi- bility of the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Kingdom ABOUT THE AUTHORS Sunčana Roksandić is assistant professor at the Department of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb. She is the Head of the Croatian Unit of the UNESCO Chair in Bioethics and member of the UNODC Anti-Corruption Academic Initiative. She was the head of Jean Monnet Project Advanced Seminar in EU Criminal Law and Policy (2016–2019). She is one of the model course developers of UNODC (E4J): Corruption, in the area of peace, corruption and security. In 2019, she received an honorary doctorate for her contribution to developing law and policy in addressing transnational corporations, economic crimes and violations of human rights (Tibilisi, Georgia, East European University).
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Local Democracy in the Western Balkans 202
    EUROPEAN UNION QG-76-06-243-EN-C Committee of the Regions Rue Belliard 101 - 1040 Brussels THE STATE OF LOCAL DEMOCRACY Tel. +32 2/282 22 11 - Fax +32 2/282 23 25 http://www.cor.europa.eu IN THE WESTERN BALKANS A Study of Local Democratic Processes and Institutions in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia and Montenegro. THE STATE OF LOCAL DEMOCRACY IN WESTERN BALKANS DEMOCRACY OF LOCAL THE THE STATE EN Price (excluding VAT) in Luxembourg: EUR 25 OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES L-2985 Luxembourg 2389_Etd Western Balkans_EN 2/10/06 13:02 Page 4 2389_Etd Western Balkans_EN 2/10/06 13:02 Page 1 THE STATE OF LOCAL DEMOCRACY IN THE WESTERN BALKANS A Study of Local Democratic Processes and Institutions in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia and Montenegro. Elena Gadjanova July 2006 2389_Etd Western Balkans_EN 2/10/06 13:02 Page 2 This study was produced by Elena Gadjanova. It does not represent the official views of the Committee of the Regions. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006 ISBN 92-895-0391-2 © European Communities, 2006 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER 2389_Etd Western Balkans_EN 2/10/06 13:02 Page 3 FOREWORD The future of the Western Balkans lies within the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy for Fighting Against Corruption in Education
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Policy Documentation Center MA Ana Selić, MA Zlatko Vujović PUBLIC POLICY STUDY POLICY FOR FIGHTING AGAINST CORRUPTION IN EDUCATION - EFFECTS OF THE CURRENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PASSING THE NEW POLICIES - 1 2 CONTENTS: INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................5 1. Corruption in education – definition, types, causes and consequences..................7 1.1. Definition...........................................................................................................................................7 1.2. Causes and consequences................................................................................................................8 1.3. Corruption in education in Montenegro.............................................................................................9 1.3.1. Public opinion on corruption in Montenegro................................................................................10 1.3.2 .Media monitoring............................................................................................................21 1.4. Aim..................................................................................................................................................21 2. The analysis of current condition of corruption in education sector of Montenegro and policies for its reduction..................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Sudan
    HELPDESK ANSWERS 2014 (JANUARY - JUNE) The Helpdesk is a knowledge base that offers the TI network and selected stakeholders on-demand research on corruption within a guaranteed timeframe. Answers typically consist of a four to eight page brief synthesising the state of knowledge on a particular topic. The Helpdesk is a key component of TI’s Anti-Corruption Solutions and Knowledge Programme (ASK). All answers listed below can be accessed on request at: [email protected]. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ CONTENT Anti-corruption laws P. 1 Institutions P. 1 Understanding corruption P. 2 Anti-corruption tools and approaches P. 3 Sector specific information P. 4 Country-specific information P. 6 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS Transparency laws in Latin America Question submitted by Transparency International Chile, June 2014 The great majority of countries in Latin America have adopted laws regulating transparency and access to public information. These laws establish the procedures and mechanisms that should be in place to ensure citizens can access public information and emphasise the role of government in proactively disclosing key information and ensure that citizens can participate in decision-making. However, the quality
    [Show full text]
  • How to Enhance Police Integrity in Montenegro?
    HOW TO ENHANCE POLICE INTEGRITY IN MONTENEGRO? Author: Dina Bajramspahić SUMMARY Notwithstanding that compared to the previous period some important steps have been made re- cently, such as the adoption of the Integrity Plan of the Ministry of Interior and slightly more active work of the Internal Control of the Police, Ethics Committee, and Disciplinary Commission, further efforts are needed. The Government of Montenegro and other relevant authorities did not make comprehensive analyses on all the aspects of corruptive behaviours in the Police, nor did they de- sign measures to treat all forms and risks of potential compromised integrity of police officers in Montenegro. The measures envisaged in several national strategic documents and the accompanying action plans are for the most part already embedded in the regular work obligations of existing bodies. The measures also fail to address altogether the necessity of establishing a more ambitious system for promoting integrity among police officers. In addition, there are no analyses that would offer an insight into the working conditions of po- lice officers, issues of their recruitment and promotion, earnings, disadvantages in training, risky behaviour, physical and psychological health, work motivation and satisfaction, unlawful political engagement, measures to improve financial management at the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Police Administration, etc. In order to overcome this situation and compensate for the lack of a thorough analysis of the state of play in the police, a new and comprehensive strategy should be designed that would include all the neglected issues and propose concrete measures with responsibilities clearly spelled out. SEPTEMBAR, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Against Corruption, Economic Fraud & Identity-Related Crime
    THEMATIC PROGRAMME ACTION AGAINST CORRUPTION, ECONOMIC FRAUD & IDENTITY-RELATED CRIME (2012 – 2015) Countering corruption by promoting transparency, integrity and accountability and by advancing equality, justice and development. 3 September 2012 Prepared by CEB/DTA Introduction................................................................................................................................4 I. NATURE OF THE CHALLENGE - AN ANALYSIS OF CORRUPTION.........................................5 Corruption - A crime against development and prosperity.......................................................5 Corruption - A crime against democracy, justice and the rule of law .......................................5 Corruption - A crime against the environment..........................................................................6 Corruption - A crime against health...........................................................................................6 Corruption - A crime against education .....................................................................................6 II. INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK and MANDATES ....................................................7 (A) THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION, THE CONFERENCE OF THE STATES PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION AND ITS SUBSIDIARY BODIES ...........................7 The United Nations Convention against Corruption ..................................................................7 The Conference of the States Parties to UNCAC........................................................................7
    [Show full text]