DOCSLIB.ORG

Visions of Nuclear Weapons: Kenneth Burke's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visions of Nuclear Weapons: Kenneth Burke's VISIONS OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS: KENNETH BURKE’S CONSUMMATION PRINCIPLE AND THE MANHATTAN PROJECT by DAVID ERLAND ISAKSEN Bachelor of Arts, 2009 University of South-Eastern Norway Bø, Norway Master of Arts, 2010 University of Central Lancashire Preston, United Kingdom Master of Arts, 2012 Brigham Young University Provo, Utah Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of AddRan College of Liberal Arts Texas Christian University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Philosophy May 2020 Copyright by David Erland Isaksen 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The first person I want to thank is my wife, Kaja-Lena Isaksen. Without her faith in me, I would probably never have embarked on such an ambitious project in the first place, and her love and support has sustained me through these years. She has also been my first reader and critic, giving me feedback on my writing and helping me to think through my research and conclusions. If we are the parents of the dissertation, then I also need to thank the grandparents of it. First of all, my own parents, Jeanne and Rolf Isaksen, who have provided much needed childcare and relief during critical writing periods and have been cheering me on. Next, the “spiritual” grandparents of the dissertation. The first of these, chronologically, is Gregory Clark. His course in rhetorical criticism at BYU introduced me to the works of Kenneth Burke and his weekly feedback on my research reports helped me to think and write as an academic. Next, Jack Selzer took the time at the 2011 Kenneth Burke Society conference to listen to my master’s thesis project and give me the crucial connection to Burke’s former student Ruth “Cookie” Liebling Goldstone. He is also the external reader on the dissertation committee and has given me much valuable feedback and encouragement. Another reader, who sadly retired before I could complete the dissertation, is Richard Leo Enos. His love of classical rhetoric was infectious, and made it clear to me in my first semester at TCU that I had come to the right place. His almost instant feedback on my chapters was also a great help. I am also grateful to Carrie Leverenz who was willing to take his place on the committee and ask me important questions about my project. Brad Lucas has, in addition to his very precise and insightful comments, made my experience in the TCU doctoral program one where I always felt heard and seen and cared ii for. And, of course, the grandmother of this dissertation, Ann George, who in addition to being one of the top experts on Kenneth Burke and New Rhetorics, has been the best committee chair I could hope for and the primary audience in my mind as I was writing this dissertation. Her sharp eye for details and incisive comments have been invaluable and have helped me a lot in my development as a researcher and writer, and she has also been a constant source of encouragement and comfort whenever I felt a bit lost or hopeless in the process. On this journey, she has been my faithful guide. I would also like to thank the former students of Kenneth Burke who helped me understand indexing and shared their papers with me, in particular Suzanne Shepherd, Ruth “Cookie” Liebling Goldstone, and Barbara Nowak. I would also like to thank Riva M. Poor, Mary Lou P. Schram, Diana G. Valenti, Sheila T. Dobbin, Joan Clifford, and Judith G. Speyer for sharing their experiences as Burke’s students. Many thanks also to Ann Burkhardt, Kenneth Burke’s former colleague, and Gretchen Dwyer and Susan D. Corcoran at Bennington College who helped me get in contact with Burke’s former students. I would also like to thank Michael Burke who, after the KBS conference in 2017 allowed me to visit Kenneth Burke’s home in Andover and look at some of Burke’s own indexing notes, and Kyle Jensen and Krista Ratcliffe who (along with Jack Selzer) led an extremely helpful research seminar on Kenneth Burke and “The War of Words” at the RSA Summer Institute in 2015. Lastly, I want to thank my children for their patience with me and for accepting when “Daddy is working on his project” (most of the time). My love to Zoey, Joseph, Ida, Jonathan, Linnea, and Daniel. You were always with me. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iv List of figures with titles and page references ................................................................................ v Chapter 1: Dissertation Introduction and Consummation .............................................................. 1 Chapter 2: Indexing as a Method to Indicate Consummation in Verbal Structures ..................... 42 Chapter 3: Three Visions of Nuclear Weapons among the Manhattan Project Scientists .......... 116 Chapter 4: Reception of the Three Visions of Nuclear Weapons Among Los Alamos Scientists ..................................................................................................................................................... 177 Conclusion: Consummation, Indexing, and the Manhattan Project ........................................... 242 Appendix A: Suzanne Shepherd’s Indexing Charts with Transcription ..................................... 260 Appendix B: Announcing the Bombing at Hiroshima ................................................................ 264 Appendix C: Robert Wilson’s Bomb Sketch with Transcription ............................................... 269 Works Cited ................................................................................................................................ 270 iv LIST OF FIGURES WITH TITLES AND PAGE REFERENCES Figure 1 Chart of hierarchy of terms in Marxism, compiled by Suzanne Shepherd .................... 82 Figure 2 Chart of hierarchy of terms in Thomism, compiled by Suzanne Shepherd .................... 88 Figure 3. Hierarchy of terms for “Announcing the Bombing of Hiroshima,” 2 levels. .............. 101 Figure 4 Hierarchy of terms for “Announcing the Bombing of Hiroshima,” 3 levels. ............... 102 Figure 5 Hierarchy of terms for “Announcing the Bombing of Hiroshima,” “atomic bomb”- pyramid. ...................................................................................................................................... 105 Figure 6 Hierarchy of terms for “Announcing the Bombing of Hiroshima, 3 levels with “atomic bomb”-pyramid integrated. ......................................................................................................... 106 Figure 7 Complete hierarchy of terms for “Announcing the Bombing of Hiroshima, 4 levels .. 108 Figure 8 Outline of the form of the experiment .......................................................................... 126 Figure 9: Hierarchy for the Frisch-Peierls Memorandum. .......................................................... 139 Figure 10 Hierarchy for negative terms in the Los Alamos Primer ............................................ 146 Figure 11 Hierarchy for positive terms in the Los Alamos Primer ............................................. 148 Figure 12 Subhierarchy of terms for “maximize damage” ......................................................... 149 Figure 13 Hierarchy for “the project” ......................................................................................... 166 Figure 14 Top three levels of “the project” with “the weapon” hierarchy included ................... 167 Figure 15 Hierarchy for “the question of control” ...................................................................... 168 Figure 16 Cycle of Terms in Bohr’s Memorandum to President Roosevelt ............................... 172 Figure 17 Hierarchy of Oppenheimer’s ascesis of peace through striving ................................. 186 Figure 18 Hierarchy of Oppenheimer’s letter to Enrico Fermi ................................................... 190 Figure 19 Complete hierarchy and dramatic unfolding in Oppenheimer’s speech to ALAS ..... 203 Figure 20 Wilson’s sketch for boosting fission bombs with cadmium and tritium .................... 223 v Visions of Nuclear Weapons: Kenneth Burke’s Consummation Principle and the Manhattan Project Chapter 1: Dissertation Introduction and Consummation Consummation is a central term in Kenneth Burke’s critical vocabulary, but there is much disagreement among Burke scholars about the meaning and use of the term. Since he referred to the development of the atomic bomb as a classic example of consummation, I argue that a critical study of the discourse among the Los Alamos scientists during 1943-46 can help to clarify what Burke meant by this concept and show how this creative motive can affect a community. The study seeks to understand how consummation develops in a group and how it may be diffused, and to develop a method to analyze it, which can be transported to study other discourses where there may be a similar drive. The Problem In “A Rhetoric of Form: The Early Burke and Reader-Response Criticism,” Greig Henderson writes that we can divide Kenneth Burke’s scholarly project based on three creative motives which were at the center of his attention: self-expression, communication, and consummation (Henderson 127). Kenneth Burke himself discusses these three stages in his 1967 afterword to Counter-Statement, titled “Curriculum Criticum”: “The step from the opening chapter . to the next essay
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rutherford's Nuclear World: the Story of the Discovery of the Nuc
    Rutherford's Nuclear World: The Story of the Discovery of the Nuc... http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/rutherford/sections/atop-physic... HOME SECTIONS CREDITS EXHIBIT HALL ABOUT US rutherford's explore the atom learn more more history of learn about aip's nuclear world with rutherford about this site physics exhibits history programs Atop the Physics Wave ShareShareShareShareShareMore 9 RUTHERFORD BACK IN CAMBRIDGE, 1919–1937 Sections ← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next → In 1962, John Cockcroft (1897–1967) reflected back on the “Miraculous Year” ( Annus mirabilis ) of 1932 in the Cavendish Laboratory: “One month it was the neutron, another month the transmutation of the light elements; in another the creation of radiation of matter in the form of pairs of positive and negative electrons was made visible to us by Professor Blackett's cloud chamber, with its tracks curled some to the left and some to the right by powerful magnetic fields.” Rutherford reigned over the Cavendish Lab from 1919 until his death in 1937. The Cavendish Lab in the 1920s and 30s is often cited as the beginning of modern “big science.” Dozens of researchers worked in teams on interrelated problems. Yet much of the work there used simple, inexpensive devices — the sort of thing Rutherford is famous for. And the lab had many competitors: in Paris, Berlin, and even in the U.S. Rutherford became Cavendish Professor and director of the Cavendish Laboratory in 1919, following the It is tempting to simplify a complicated story. Rutherford directed the Cavendish Lab footsteps of J.J. Thomson. Rutherford died in 1937, having led a first wave of discovery of the atom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy And
    The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy and Anglo-American Relations, 1939 – 1958 Submitted by: Geoffrey Charles Mallett Skinner to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, July 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Abstract There was no special governmental partnership between Britain and America during the Second World War in atomic affairs. A recalibration is required that updates and amends the existing historiography in this respect. The wartime atomic relations of those countries were cooperative at the level of science and resources, but rarely that of the state. As soon as it became apparent that fission weaponry would be the main basis of future military power, America decided to gain exclusive control over the weapon. Britain could not replicate American resources and no assistance was offered to it by its conventional ally. America then created its own, closed, nuclear system and well before the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, the event which is typically seen by historians as the explanation of the fracturing of wartime atomic relations. Immediately after 1945 there was insufficient systemic force to create change in the consistent American policy of atomic monopoly. As fusion bombs introduced a new magnitude of risk, and as the nuclear world expanded and deepened, the systemic pressures grew.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apocalypse Archive: American Literature and the Nuclear
    THE APOCALYPSE ARCHIVE: AMERICAN LITERATURE AND THE NUCLEAR BOMB by Bradley J. Fest B. A. in English and Creative Writing, University of Arizona, Tucson, 2004 M. F. A. in Creative Writing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 2007 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Bradley J. Fest It was defended on 17 April 2013 and approved by Jonathan Arac, PhD, Andrew W. Mellon Professor of English Adam Lowenstein, PhD, Associate Professor of English and Film Studies Philip E. Smith, PhD, Associate Professor of English Terry Smith, PhD, Andrew W. Mellon Professor of Contemporary Art History and Theory Dissertation Director: Jonathan Arac, PhD, Andrew W. Mellon Professor of English ii Copyright © Bradley J. Fest 2013 iii THE APOCALYPSE ARCHIVE: AMERICAN LITERATURE AND THE NUCLEAR BOMB Bradley J. Fest, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 This dissertation looks at global nuclear war as a trope that can be traced throughout twentieth century American literature. I argue that despite the non-event of nuclear exchange during the Cold War, the nuclear referent continues to shape American literary expression. Since the early 1990s the nuclear referent has dispersed into a multiplicity of disaster scenarios, producing a “second nuclear age.” If the atomic bomb once introduced the hypothesis “of a total and remainderless destruction of the archive,” today literature’s staged anticipation of catastrophe has become inseparable from the realities of global risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference Record 2008/18 Gurgenci, H
    GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA Sir Mark Oliphant Conferences – International Frontiers of Science and Technology Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference Record 2008/18 Gurgenci, H. and Budd, A.R. APPLYING GEOSCIENCE TO AUSTRALIA’S MOST IMPORTANT CHALLENGES Proceedings of the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Australian Geothermal Energy Conference GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA RECORD 2008/18 Edited by Hal Gurgenci 1 and Anthony Budd 2 1 Queensland Geothermal Energy Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072 2 Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601 Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism Minister for Resources and Energy: The Hon. Martin Ferguson, AM MP Secretary: Dr Peter Boxall Geoscience Australia Chief Executive Officer: Dr Neil Williams PSM © Commonwealth of Australia, 2008 This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealings for the purpose of study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Copyright is the responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia. Requests and enquiries should be directed to the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378 Canberra ACT 2601. Geoscience Australia has tried to make the information in this product as accurate as possible. However, it does not guarantee that the information is totally accurate or complete. Therefore, you should not solely rely on this information when making a commercial decision. ISSN 1448-2177 ISBN 978 1 921498 19 0 GeoCat # 67255 Recommended bibliographic reference: Gurgenci, H. and Budd, A.R. (editors), 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, J
    A Selected Bibliography of Publications by, and about, J. Robert Oppenheimer Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 17 March 2021 Version 1.47 Title word cross-reference $1 [Duf46]. $12.95 [Edg91]. $13.50 [Tho03]. $14.00 [Hug07]. $15.95 [Hen81]. $16.00 [RS06]. $16.95 [RS06]. $17.50 [Hen81]. $2.50 [Opp28g]. $20.00 [Hen81, Jor80]. $24.95 [Fra01]. $25.00 [Ger06]. $26.95 [Wol05]. $27.95 [Ger06]. $29.95 [Goo09]. $30.00 [Kev03, Kle07]. $32.50 [Edg91]. $35 [Wol05]. $35.00 [Bed06]. $37.50 [Hug09, Pol07, Dys13]. $39.50 [Edg91]. $39.95 [Bad95]. $8.95 [Edg91]. α [Opp27a, Rut27]. γ [LO34]. -particles [Opp27a]. -rays [Rut27]. -Teilchen [Opp27a]. 0-226-79845-3 [Guy07, Hug09]. 0-8014-8661-0 [Tho03]. 0-8047-1713-3 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1714-1 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1721-4 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1722-2 [Edg91]. 0-9672617-3-2 [Bro06, Hug07]. 1 [Opp57f]. 109 [Con05, Mur05, Nas07, Sap05a, Wol05, Kru07]. 112 [FW07]. 1 2 14.99/$25.00 [Ber04a]. 16 [GHK+96]. 1890-1960 [McG02]. 1911 [Meh75]. 1945 [GHK+96, Gow81, Haw61, Bad95, Gol95a, Hew66, She82, HBP94]. 1945-47 [Hew66]. 1950 [Ano50]. 1954 [Ano01b, GM54, SZC54]. 1960s [Sch08a]. 1963 [Kuh63]. 1967 [Bet67a, Bet97, Pun67, RB67]. 1976 [Sag79a, Sag79b]. 1981 [Ano81]. 20 [Goe88]. 2005 [Dre07]. 20th [Opp65a, Anoxx, Kai02].
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Barriers to Anglo-American Nuclear Cooperation
    3 HISTORIC BARRIERS TO ANGLO- AMERICAN NUCLEAR COOPERATION ANDREW BROWN Despite being the closest of allies, with shared values and language, at- tempts by the United Kingdom and the United States to reach accords on nuclear matters generated distrust and resentment but no durable arrangements until the Mutual Defense Agreement of 1958. There were times when the perceived national interests of the two countries were unsynchronized or at odds; periods when political leaders did not see eye to eye or made secret agreements that remained just that; and when espionage, propaganda, and public opinion caused addi- tional tensions. STATUS IMBALANCE The Magna Carta of the nuclear age is the two-part Frisch-Peierls mem- orandum. It was produced by two European émigrés, Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls, at Birmingham University in the spring of 1940. Un- like Einstein’s famous letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, with its vague warning that a powerful new bomb might be constructed from uranium, the Frisch-Peierls memorandum set out detailed technical arguments leading to the conclusion that “a moderate amount of U-235 [highly enriched uranium] would indeed constitute an extremely effi- cient explosive.” Like Einstein, Frisch and Peierls were worried that the Germans might already be working toward an atomic bomb against which there would be no defense. By suggesting “a counter-threat with a similar bomb,” they first enunciated the concept of mutual deterrence and recommended “start[ing] production as soon as possible, even if 36 Historic Barriers to Anglo-American Nuclear Cooperation 37 it is not intended to use the bomb as a means of attack.”1 Professor Mark Oliphant from Birmingham convinced the UK authorities that “the whole thing must be taken rather seriously,”2 and a small group of senior scientists came together as the Maud Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glamorization of Espionage in the International Spy Museum
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2015 Counter to Intelligence: The Glamorization of Espionage in the International Spy Museum Melanie R. Wiggins College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the American Film Studies Commons, American Material Culture Commons, American Popular Culture Commons, Other American Studies Commons, and the Sociology of Culture Commons Recommended Citation Wiggins, Melanie R., "Counter to Intelligence: The Glamorization of Espionage in the International Spy Museum" (2015). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 133. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/133 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Counter to Intelligence: The Glamorization of Espionage in the International Spy Museum A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in American Studies from The College of William and Mary by Melanie Rose Wiggins Accepted for____________________________________________________ (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors) _________________________________________________________ Alan Braddock, Director _________________________________________________________ Charlie McGovern _________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Character List
    Character List - Bomb ​ Use this chart to help you keep track of the hundreds of names of physicists, freedom fighters, government officials, and others involved in the making of the atomic bomb. Scientists Political/Military Leaders Spies Robert Oppenheimer - Winston Churchill -- Prime Klaus Fuchs - physicist in ​ ​ ​ designed atomic bomb. He was Minister of England Manhattan Project who gave accused of spying. secrets to Russia Franklin D. Roosevelt -- ​ Albert Einstein - convinced President of the United States Harry Gold - spy and Courier ​ ​ U.S. government that they for Russia KGB. Narrator of the needed to research fission. Harry Truman -- President of story ​ the United States Enrico Fermi - created first Ruth Werner - Russian spy ​ ​ chain reaction Joseph Stalin -- dictator of the ​ Tell Hall -- physicist in Soviet Union ​ Igor Korchatov -- Russian Manhattan Project who gave ​ physicist in charge of designing Adolf Hitler -- dictator of secrets to Russia ​ bomb Germany Haakon Chevalier - friend who ​ Werner Reisenberg -- Leslie Groves -- Military approached Oppenheimer about ​ ​ German physicist in charge of leader of the Manhattan Project spying for Russia. He was designing bomb watched by the FBI, but he was not charged. Otto Hahn -- German physicist ​ who discovered fission Other scientists involved in the Manhattan Project: ​ Aage Niels Bohr George Kistiakowsky Joseph W. Kennedy Richard Feynman Arthur C. Wahl Frank Oppenheimer Joseph Rotblat Robert Bacher Arthur H. Compton Hans Bethe Karl T. Compton Robert Serber Charles Critchfield Harold Agnew Kenneth Bainbridge Robert Wilson Charles Thomas Harold Urey Leo James Rainwater Rudolf Pelerls Crawford Greenewalt Harold DeWolf Smyth Leo Szilard Samuel K. Allison Cyril S. Smith Herbert L. Anderson Luis Alvarez Samuel Goudsmit Edward Norris Isidor I.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Criticism: Precautionary Reading in an Age of Environmental
    0/-*/&4637&: *ODPMMBCPSBUJPOXJUI6OHMVFJU XFIBWFTFUVQBTVSWFZ POMZUFORVFTUJPOT UP MFBSONPSFBCPVUIPXPQFOBDDFTTFCPPLTBSFEJTDPWFSFEBOEVTFE 8FSFBMMZWBMVFZPVSQBSUJDJQBUJPOQMFBTFUBLFQBSU $-*$,)&3& "OFMFDUSPOJDWFSTJPOPGUIJTCPPLJTGSFFMZBWBJMBCMF UIBOLTUP UIFTVQQPSUPGMJCSBSJFTXPSLJOHXJUI,OPXMFEHF6OMBUDIFE ,6JTBDPMMBCPSBUJWFJOJUJBUJWFEFTJHOFEUPNBLFIJHIRVBMJUZ CPPLT0QFO"DDFTTGPSUIFQVCMJDHPPE Revised Pages RISK CRITICISM Revised Pages Revised Pages Risk Criticism PRECAUTIONARY READING IN AN AGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY Molly Wallace UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRESS Ann Arbor Revised Pages Copyright © 2016 by Molly Wallace All rights reserved This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publisher. Published in the United States of America by the University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America c Printed on acid- free paper 2019 2018 2017 2016 4 3 2 1 A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Wallace, Molly, author. Title: Risk criticism : precautionary reading in an age of environmental uncertainty / Molly Wallace. Description: Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 2016. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2015038637 | ISBN 9780472073023 (hardback) | ISBN 9780472053025 (paperback) | ISBN 9780472121694 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Ecocriticism. | Criticism. | Risk in literature. | Environmental risk assessment. | Risk-taking (Psychology) Classification: LCC PN98.E36 W35 2016 | DDC 809/.93355— dc23 LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2015038637 Revised Pages For my family Revised Pages Revised Pages Acknowledgments This book has been a number of years in the writing, and I am deeply grate- ful for the support and encouragement that I have received along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Bomb by John Lamperti
    November, 2012 Thoughts on Making the Bomb by John Lamperti I recently finished reading Martin Sherwin and Kai Bird’s monumental American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer.1 It's an admirable book, although I think the title might better have been American Faust. (No less than Freeman Dyson said Oppenheimer made a "Faustian bargain."2) There have been many books about Oppenheimer and the atomic bomb project in general; I've read some but not all of them. This one seems to be definitive. Everything we need to know is there – and it's a fascinating read. Two things struck me especially, and neither was directly about Oppenheimer. One was the ideological rigidity, and the blindness, of the crowd of Army and FBI "security" operatives who dogged Oppenheimer and the whole Manhattan Project from the beginning. To a man (no women are mentioned) they were obsessed with the pre-war leftist politics of many of the scientists, which they found highly suspicious and probably indicative of disloyalty. But while these agents were hounding leftists and "premature anti-fascists" (as supporters of the Spanish Republic were called) at Los Alamos and elsewhere and finding little or nothing, real spies were sending real scientific information to the USSR under their noses, apparently unsuspected. If the "security" people, especially Lt. Col. Boris Pash of Army Counter– Intelligence, had been given free rein, Oppenheimer and many others (but not the actual spies!) would have been banished from the Project and the "Trinity" test, as well as the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, might never have happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Space and Defense Issue
    33SPAC E and DEFENSE Volume Eleven Number One Spring 2019 China’s Military Space Strategy Sam Rouleau Volume Five Number One Communicating Cyber Consequences Sum Timothy Goines mer 2011 Why Brazil Ventured a Nuclear Program Saint-Clair Lima da Silva Arms Control & Deterrence Coalitions in Space:Damon Coletta Where Networks are CadetPower Voice—Curious Trinity: War, Media, Public Opinion byLaura James Olson Clay Moltz The 2010 National Space Policy: Down to Earth? by Joan Johnson-Freese Space & Defense Journal of the United States Air Force Academy Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies Publisher Col. Kris Bauman, [email protected] Director, Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies Editors Dr. Damon Coletta Dr. Michelle Black U.S. Air Force Academy, USA University of Nebraska, Omaha Associate Editors Mr. Deron Jackson Dr. Peter Hays U.S. Air Force Academy, USA George Washington University, USA Dr. Schuyler Foerster Ms. Jonty Kasku-Jackson U.S. Air Force Academy, USA National Security Space Institute, USA Thank You to Our Reviewers Andrew Aldrin Christopher Dunlap United Launch Alliance, USA Naval Postgraduate School, USA James Armor Paul Eckart ATK, USA Boeing, USA William Barry Andrew Erickson NASA Headquarters, USA Naval War College, USA Daniel Blinder Joanne Gabrynowicz UNSAM-CONICET, Argentina University of Mississippi, USA Robert Callahan Jason Healey NORAD-NORTHCOM, USA Atlantic Council, USA James Cameron Stephen Herzog Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil Yale University, USA Robert Carriedo Theresa Hitchens U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • WGBH International Newsletter Winter 2008
    WINTER 2015 QUARTERLY NEWS NEWS QUARTERLY © PATRICK ZIMMERMAN This compelling series takes viewers on an exciting and visually stunning journey to the beautiful and historic places where Christianity was born and grew from a small movement to its place as the official religion of the Roman Empire. Join author and distinguished history professor Jonathan Phillips of Royal Holloway, University of London, as he takes viewers on a captivating adventure through four centuries and seven countries throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe, to the very places where Christianity began. 6x52 SCREEN PBS INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS ONLINE AT PBSINTERNATIONAL.ORG PBS INTERNATIONAL 10 Guest Street Boston, MA 02135 USA Phone: +1.617.208.0735 Fax: +1.617-208-0783 pbsinternational.org Tom Koch Vice President, PBS Distribution Phone: +1.617.208.0735 [email protected] Betsy LeBlanc Director U.S., United Kingdom, Scandinavia, Eastern Europe, Africa Phone: +1.617.208.0737 [email protected] Nanci Church Sales Manager Americas, France, Switzerland, Greece, Turkey, Oceania Phone: +1.617.208.0725 [email protected] Anna Alvord Sales Manager Asia, Germany, Iberia, Italy, Middle East A revolution is happening overhead. Super-surveillance In March 2014, residents along a river in the mountains Phone: +1.617.208.0728 drones that can see objects as small as six inches across of Washington state were interrupted by the terrifying [email protected] and track human movements are starting to appear in sound of the equivalent of three million dump truck loads Tracy Beckett Acquisitions our skies. Amazon.com plans to deliver goods door-to- of earth plummeting down the valley.
    [Show full text]