DOCSLIB.ORG

Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia a COUNTRY PROFILE 2015 Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia a COUNTRY PROFILE 2015 Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia A COUNTRY PROFILE 2015 Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia States Federated in the Migration Caroline Islands Yap Chuuk Kosrae Pohnpei A COUNTRY PROFILE 2015 PROFILE A COUNTRY International Organization for Migration (IOM) 17 route des Morillons, P.O. Box 17, 1211 Geneva 19, Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 717 9111 • Fax: +41 22 798 6150 E-mail: [email protected] • Website: www.iom.int The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in the meeting of operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. This publication is co-funded by the IOM Development Fund. Publisher: International Organization for Migration 17 route des Morillons P.O. Box 17 1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 717 9111 Fax: +41 22 798 6150 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.iom.int _____________________________________________________ © 2016 International Organization for Migration (IOM) _____________________________________________________ All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. 61_15 Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia A COUNTRY PROFILE 2015 FOREWORD Like many small island developing States (SIDS), the Federated States of Micronesia faces many challenges in its quest for greater sustainable development and economic stability. So exceptional are the problems faced by SIDS that their special development needs were specifically mentioned in the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals and reiterated in the SIDS Accelerated Modalities of Action (SAMOA) Pathway in September 2014. It is recognized that the ability of SIDS, such as the Federated States of Micronesia to sustain high levels of economic growth and job creation has and continues to be affected by the ongoing adverse impacts of the global economic crisis, declining foreign direct investment, trade imbalances, lack of adequate connectivity, energy and information and communications technology infrastructure networks, limited human and institutional capacity and the inability to integrate effectively into the global economy. The growth prospects of these States will also continue to be hindered by other factors, including the impact of climate change. Micronesia, through the Compact of Free Association signed with the United States, receives significant direct assistance to assist in its path towards economic self-sufficiency. In addition to tourism, which is slowly growing, emphasis should be placed on the potential that Micronesia has through its 2,996,410 sq. km. Economic Exclusive Zone and focusing more towards an ocean-based economy. International migration trends in the Federated States of Micronesia have been shaped by the possibilities offered to the Micronesians to move and work freely in the United States since 1986. However, from the data collected in this first Migration Profile, the potential that migration can bring to the socioeconomic development of Micronesia is still untapped. If adequately managed, migration can enable economic development by providing the necessary skills, labour and innovation, such as through contributions of transnational and diaspora communities. The important vulnerability, however, of the Federated States of Micronesia to the damaging impacts of natural disasters and induced displacement ought to be carefully monitored. The recent Super Typhoon Maysak in March 2015, which affected 29,000 persons and damaged nearly 615 houses, is a vivid example of the risk. On the other hand, migration can also constitute an adaptation strategy to environmental change, confirmed in the recently adopted Sendai Framework for Disaster Reduction (2015–2030). Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia – A Country Profile 2015 iii While migration to and within Micronesia has been increasing, available information and data on migration patterns and projections are still lacking. This first edition of the Migration Profile for the Federated States of Micronesia aims to support a stronger evidence-based policymaking to government and other migration management practitioners, and by ensuring that relevant government officials have the skills, tools and knowledge to regularly collect, consolidate, analyse and report on migration data. It should also constitute the basis of understanding on how migration can contribute to national development priorities within the four States of the Federated States of Micronesia. The Migration Profile of the Federated States of Micronesia resulted from a series of consultations involving more than 30 governmental agencies, civil society organizations and private sector representatives over a period of six months. These consultations allowed collating a comprehensive collection of migration data sets, analysis of gaps and identification of challenges. I would like to express my appreciation and sincere thanks to the Government of the Federated States of Micronesia for their support and efforts in finalizing with IOM this first Migration Profile for the Federated States of Micronesia. Stuart Simpson Chief of Mission International Organization for Migration (IOM) IOM Micronesia iv Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia – A Country Profile 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Main authors: Michael Levin (IOM Independent Consultant) Andrew Harrington (IOM Independent Consultant) Key institutional Office of Statistics, Budget and Economic partners: Management, Overseas Development, and Compact Management (SBOC) Department of Foreign Affairs Department of Justice (DOJ) Division of Immigration and Labor Office (DOL) Contributing Division of Statistics (SBOC) agencies/ Overseas Development Assistance Division (SBOC) partners of Trade and Investment (Department of Research and the Federated States Development) of Micronesia Resources Management and Development – Tourism Unit (Department of Research and Development) Trade and Investment (Department of Research and Development) Department of Health and Social Affairs Department of Education Congress of the Federated States of Micronesia United States Embassy Division of National Police and Surveillance Transnational Crime Unit Office of the Public Defender Supreme Court of Micronesia Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) PNI State Governor’s Office Pohnpei Port Authority Banking Board of the Federates States of Micronesia PNI Office of State Social Affairs UN Joint Presence Bank of the FSM Peace Corps United Filipino Community of Pohnpei Association of Filipino Ladies in Pohnpei PNI Registrar Office Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia – A Country Profile 2015 v Guam: Bureau of Statistics and Plans University of Guam Guam Community College Guam Visitors Bureau Department of Education Department of Labor CNMI Department of Commerce Central Statistics Division Hawaii: University of Hawaii East-West Center Participating College of Micronesia agencies: Salvation Army Pohnpei Consumer Organization Pohnpei Legislature World Health Organization (WHO) Secretariat of the Pacific Community IOM project Zuzana Jankechova (IOM Programme Officer, Federated management team States of Micronesia) Lalini Veerassamy (IOM) vi Migration in the Federated States of Micronesia – A Country Profile 2015 CONTENTS Foreword ............................................................................................iii Acknowledgements .............................................................................v List of tables .......................................................................................ix List of figures .......................................................................................x Abbreviations and acronyms...............................................................xi Executive summary .......................................................................... xiii Introduction ........................................................................................1 Part A: Data sources on migration in the Federated States of Micronesia ...........................................................................3 A.1. Statistical data sources on migration ........................................................ 3 A.1.1. Data from censuses ........................................................................ 3 A.1.2. Sample surveys ............................................................................. 12 A.1.3. Other secondary statistical data sources ...................................... 14 A.2. Administrative data sources on migration .............................................. 15 A.2.1. Border data crossings ..................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FORWARD to INTRODUCTION.Pmd
    FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA CEDAW Legislative Compliance Review 50 2 LEGISLATIVE COMPLIANCE OF THE FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA 2.1 Introduction enough to completely remove the obligations created under any of the indicators for Article 5 and 16 and This Chapter examines and assesses the legislative therefore the legislative compliance of the FSM and compliance of the Federated States of Micronesia its four states has been measured on these indicators. (FSM) with CEDAW. FSM consists of a national Therefore, in sum, the FSM and its four states have government and four states: Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei each been measured against 111 indicators. and Yap. FSM ratified CEDAW on 1 September 2004, obliging it to work towards the modification of its It should also be noted that, through the national constitution and legislation to accord with the constitution of the FSM, which is the basis for all provisions of CEDAW. However, it is recognised that legal authority, the power to legislate is divided FSM is at the beginning of its compliance process between the FSM parliament and the state and that legislative compliance will be achieved parliaments. Whilst the FSM has express power over through gradual and incremental change. areas such as tax, trade and national crimes, it may also establish systems of social security and public This review’s assessment of FSM’s legislative welfare concurrently with the states. This review compliance with CEDAW is based on the indicators has measured FSM against both the indicators which identified in Chapter One and should be read in concern its express powers to legislate and against conjunction with the commentary on each indicator the indicators that relate to its power to implement included in that Chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangroves Occurring on the Many Islands in the South Pacific Are Only a Small Component When Compared to the Worldwide Inventory of Mangroves
    TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND SUPPORT FOR MANGROVE AND LITTORAL FOREST MANAGEMENT, PLANNING AND TRAINING FOR SMALL ISLANDS IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC Jan. 25, 2004 by James Denny Ward USDA Forest Service i FOREWORD Mangroves occurring on the many islands in the South Pacific are only a small component when compared to the worldwide inventory of mangroves. Although the mangroves found on the smaller islands may not seem as important on the global scale, they are extremely important to the small individual countries. Some of their benefits include shoreline protection, biodiversity, fisheries and a source for traditional products like building material, fuelwood and various cultural uses. These benefits are even more important to small island countries with limited resources and contributed to the survival of the indigenous people in earlier times. Realizing the importance of the mangrove resource the Forest & Trees Support Programme of SPC and the Heads of Forestry in the Pacific in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service conducted several missions during the last 10 years to assist the smaller island countries with preserving, protecting and managing their mangroves . The USDA Forest Service’s Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry based in Hawaii has been providing assistance to the Federated States of Micronesia and other islands with close ties to the United States for several years. Research conducted by this group has contributed greatly to the information base needed to manage mangroves throughout the South Pacific. This report is not all-inclusive but it is hoped that it will contain sufficient information to assist small islands in developing a management strategy for their individual countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnography of Ontong Java and Tasman Islands with Remarks Re: the Marqueen and Abgarris Islands
    PACIFIC STUDIES Vol. 9, No. 3 July 1986 ETHNOGRAPHY OF ONTONG JAVA AND TASMAN ISLANDS WITH REMARKS RE: THE MARQUEEN AND ABGARRIS ISLANDS by R. Parkinson Translated by Rose S. Hartmann, M.D. Introduced and Annotated by Richard Feinberg Kent State University INTRODUCTION The Polynesian outliers for years have held a special place in Oceanic studies. They have figured prominently in discussions of Polynesian set- tlement from Thilenius (1902), Churchill (1911), and Rivers (1914) to Bayard (1976) and Kirch and Yen (1982). Scattered strategically through territory generally regarded as either Melanesian or Microne- sian, they illustrate to varying degrees a merging of elements from the three great Oceanic culture areas—thus potentially illuminating pro- cesses of cultural diffusion. And as small bits of land, remote from urban and administrative centers, they have only relatively recently experienced the sustained European contact that many decades earlier wreaked havoc with most islands of the “Polynesian Triangle.” The last of these characteristics has made the outliers particularly attractive to scholars interested in glimpsing Polynesian cultures and societies that have been but minimally influenced by Western ideas and Pacific Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3—July 1986 1 2 Pacific Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3—July 1986 accoutrements. For example, Tikopia and Anuta in the eastern Solo- mons are exceptional in having maintained their traditional social structures, including their hereditary chieftainships, almost entirely intact. And Papua New Guinea’s three Polynesian outliers—Nukuria, Nukumanu, and Takuu—may be the only Polynesian islands that still systematically prohibit Christian missionary activities while proudly maintaining important elements of their old religions.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals of Pakin Atoll, Eastern Caroline Islands
    Micronesica 29(1): 37-48 , 1996 Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals of Pakin Atoll, Eastern Caroline Islands DONALD W. BUDEN Division Mathematics of and Science, College of Micronesia, P. 0 . Box 159 Kolonia, Polmpei, Federated States of Micronesia 96941. Abstract-Fifteen species of reptiles, 18 birds, and five mammals are recorded from Pakin Atoll. None is endemic to Pakin and all of the residents tend to be widely distributed throughout Micronesia. Intro­ duced species include four mammals (Rattus exulans, Canis fami/iaris, Fe/is catus, Sus scrofa), the Red Junglefowl (Gallus gal/us) among birds, and at least one lizard (Varanus indicus). Of the 17 indigenous birds, ten are presumed or documented breeding residents, including four land birds, a heron, and five terns. The Micronesian Honeyeater (My=omela rubratra) is the most common land bird, followed closely by the Micro­ nesian Starling (Aplonis opaca). The vegetation is mainly Cocos forest, considerably modified by periodic cutting of the undergrowth, deliber­ ately set fires, and the rooting of pigs. Most of the present vertebrate species do not appear to be seriously endangered by present levels of human activity. But the Micronesian Pigeon (Ducula oceanica) is less numerous on the settled islands, probably reflecting increased hunting pressure, and sea turtles (especially Chelonia mydas) and their eggs are harvested indiscriminately . Introduction Terrestrial vertebrates have been poorly studied on many of the remote atolls of Micronesia, and distributional records are lacking or scanty for many islands. The present study documents the occurrence and relative abundance of reptiles, birds, and mammals on Pakin Atoll for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 7 August 2015
    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/23/FSM/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 August 2015 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Twenty-third session 2–13 November 2015 National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21* Federated States of Micronesia * The present document has been reproduced as received. Its content does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations. GE.15-13374(E) *1513374* A/HRC/WG.6/23/FSM/1 Acronyms AIDS Auto Immune Deficiency Syndrome CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women CPBR Child Protection Baseline Report CRPD Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability EpiNet Epidemiology Network FHSS Family Health and Safety Study FSM Federated States of Micronesia HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus IAC Inter-Agency Conference ILO International Labor Organization IOM International Organization for Migration MedEvac Medical Evacuation NWC National Women’s Conference OHCHR Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights SDP Strategic Development Plan UNCAC United Nations Conventions Against Corruption UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFPA United Nations Population Fund VAW Violent Against Women WHO World Health Organization 2 A/HRC/WG.6/23/FSM/1 Background 1. The Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) is comprised of four major island groups totaling 607 islands in the North Pacific Ocean and forming four states in the federation: Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei, and Yap. 2. The FSM was colonized by Spain, Germany, and Japan in the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century, and was administered as a United Nations strategic trusteeship by the United States of America after World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Micronesica 37(1) Final
    Micronesica 37(1):163-166, 2004 A Record of Perochirus cf. scutellatus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Ulithi Atoll, Caroline Islands GARY J. WILES1 Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources, 192 Dairy Road, Mangilao, Guam 96913, USA Abstract—This paper documents the occurrence of the gecko Perochirus cf. scutellatus at Ulithi Atoll in the Caroline Islands, where it is possibly restricted to a single islet. This represents just the third known location for the species and extends its range by 975 km. Information gathered to date suggests the species was once more widespread and is perhaps sensitive to human-induced habitat change. The genus Perochirus is comprised of three extant species of gecko native to Micronesia and Vanuatu and an extinct form from Tonga (Brown 1976, Pregill 1993, Crombie & Pregill 1999). The giant Micronesian gecko (P. scutellatus) is the largest member of the genus and was until recently considered endemic to Kapingamarangi Atoll in southern Micronesia, where it is common on many islets (Buden 1998a, 1998b). Crombie & Pregill (1999) reported two specimens resem- bling this species from Fana in the Southwest Islands of Palau; these are consid- ered to be P. cf. scutellatus pending further comparison with material from Kapingamarangi (R. Crombie, pers. comm.). Herein, I document the occurrence of P. cf. scutellatus from an additional site in Micronesia. During a week-long fruit bat survey at Ulithi Atoll in Yap State, Caroline Islands in March 1986 (Wiles et al. 1991), 14 of the atoll’s larger islets com- prising 77% of the total land area were visited. Fieldwork was conducted pri- marily from dawn to dusk, with four observers spending much of their time walking transects through the forested interior of each islet.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008
    OCHA Regional Office for Asia Pacific Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008 OCHA Presence in the Pacific Northern Papua New Guinea Fiji Mariana Humanitarian Affairs Unit (HAU), PNG Regional Disaster Response Islands (U.S.) UN House , Level 14, DeloitteTower, Advisor (RDRA), Fiji Douglas Street, PO Box 1041, 360 Victoria Parade, 3rd Floor Fiji +10 Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Development Bank Building, Suva, FIJI Tel: +675 321 2877 Tel: +679 331 6760, +679 331 6761 International Date Line Fax: +675 321 1224 Fax: +679 330 9762 Saipan Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Head: Vini Talai Head: Peter Muller Agana +12 Guam (U.S.) Pacific Ocean +10 MARSHALL ISLANDS Legend Depth (m) OCHA Presence Below 5,000 1,001 to 2,000 MICRONESIA (FSO) Koror Majuro Country capital Palikir 4,001 to 5,000 501 to 1,000 Territory capital PALAU +11 Illustrative boundary 3,001 to 4,000 101 to 500 +9 +10 Time difference with UTC 2,001 to 3,000 o to 100 Tarawa (New York: UTC -5 Equator NAURU Geneva: UTC +1) IMPORTANT NOTE: The boundaries on this map are for illustrative purposes only Yaren Naming Convention and were derived from the map ’The +12 +12 KIRIBATI UN MEMBER STATE Pacific Islands’ published in 2004 by the Territory or Associated State Secretariat of the Pacific Community. INDONESIA TUVALU -11 -10 PAPUA NEW GUINEA United Nations Office for the Coordination +10 +12 of Humanitarian affairs (OCHA) Funafuti Toke lau (N.Z.) Regional Office for Asia Pacific (ROAP) Honiara Executive Suite, 2nd Floor, -10 UNCC Building,
    [Show full text]
  • Kosrae (Federated States of Micronesia)
    KOSRAE (FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA) Population: 0.104m Website: N/A MANDATE Recycling Program Regulations Enacted: 1991 Last Updated: 2006 Authority: Kosrae State Government PROGRAM SCOPE Material: Aluminum, plastic, glass Beverage type: N/A Excluded: N/A DEPOSITS AND FEES Deposit Initiator: N/A Deposit value: $0.06 ($0.05 returned to consumer) Unredeemed deposits: Deposited into a Recycling Fund that is a Fund of the Treasury with the Kosrae State Government Handling Fee: $0.01 SYSTEM OPERATOR Clearing System: N/A System Operator & Administrator: A private operator has been contracted to operate the scheme on behalf of the Kosrae Island Resource Management Authority (KIRMA) REDEMPTION SYSTEM Return to Redemption Center Material owner: N/A SYSTEM RESULTS (2014) Total Return Rate: N/A 85 MONEY MATERIAL FLOW Pays price + deposit amount Pays price + deposit amount 3 1 Purchases beverages Purchases beverages Retailer Importer 2 Pays deposit + handling fee Drinks beverage handling + Kosrae State Gov’t refund Treasury Dept. Pays fee 4 Return Data 5 Material Scrap Value Returns empty containers to redemption location + System Operator ecycler Local r receives deposit (Private company Sells materials back under contract to collected gov’t) 6 86 KIRIBATI Population: 0.11m Website: N/A MANDATE The Special Fund (Waste Materials Recovery) Act Enacted: 2004 Implemented: 2005 Authority: Ministry of Environment PROGRAM SCOPE Material: Aluminum cans, plastic PET bottles Beverage type: Beer, soft drink, and water Excluded: Milk DEPOSITS AND FEES Deposit
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Turtle Newsletter
    Marine Turtle Newsletter Number 41 September 1987 Editor: Nat B. Frazer Department of Biology Mercer University 1400 Coleman Avenue Macon, GA 31207 USA Associate Editor: John P. Eylers Editorial Board: Peter C. H. Pritchard, Anders G. J. Rhodin, Harold F. Hirth, N. Mrosovsky REPORT FROM OROLUK Oroluk is a low coral atoll in the Caroline Islands in the mid-Pacific region. It is located about 1600 km ESE of Guam and about 300 km east from Pohnpei Island. This small island (18 hectares) historically has had large numbers of nesting green turtles, and Pritchard (1977) felt Oroluk was the most important nesting ground in the state. From June through July 1985 and May through August 1986 turtles were tagged and their activities watched. The arrival of turtle project personnel on Oroluk in May 1986 was a sad day for them. The residents of the island (7 people) killed three female turtles and cooked turtle eggs to take with them on the field trip ship back to Pohnpei. Project staff also found that two turtles tagged in May 1985 were eaten in August of the same year. During the 1986 period, some preliminary work was done to protect two nests with wire cages and to look at hatching success. Humerus bones were collected, and forwarded to Dr. George Balazs of US National Marine Fisheries Service in Honolulu. So far, one turtle tagged during the project has been seen elsewhere. A 99 cm female was tagged while nesting on Oroluk 2 June 1986 and laid 72 eggs. The turtle was captured alive in Nan- Way Bay in Taiwan on 18 April 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM Micronesia
    IOM Micronesia Federated States of Micronesia Republic of the Marshall Islands Republic of Palau Newsletter, July 2018 - April 2019 IOM staff Nathan Glancy inspects a damaged house in Chuuk during the JDA. Credit: USAID, 2019 Typhoon Wutip Destruction Typhoon Wutip passed over Pohnpei, Chuuk, and Yap States, FSM between 19 and 22 February with winds of 75–80 mph and gusts of up to 100 mph. Wutip hit the outer islands of Chuuk State, including the ‘Northwest’ islands (Houk, Poluwat, Polap, Tamatam and Onoun) and the ‘Lower and ‘Middle’ Mortlocks islands, as well as the outer islands of Yap (Elato, Fechailap, Lamotrek, Piig and Satawal) before continuing southwest of Guam and slowly dissipating by the end of February. FSM President, H.E. Peter M. Christian issued a Declaration of Disaster on March 11 and requested international assistance to respond to the damage caused by the typhoon. Consistent with the USAID/FEMA Operational Blueprint for Disaster Relief and Reconstruction in the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), a Joint Damage Assessment (JDA) was carried out by representatives of USAID, OFDA, FEMA and the Government of FSM from 18 March to 4 April, with assistance from IOM. The JDA assessed whether Wutip damage qualifies for a US Presidential Disaster Declaration. The JDA found Wutip had caused damage to the infrastructure and agricultural production of 30 islands, The path of Typhoon Wutip Feb 19-22, 2019. Credit: US JDA, 2019. leaving 11,575 persons food insecure. Response to Typhoon Wutip IOM, with the support of USAID/OFDA, has responded with continued distributions of relief items stored in IOM warehouses such as tarps, rope and reverse osmosis (RO) units to affected communities on the outer islands of Chuuk, Yap and Pohnpei states.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Pohnpei Land Use Plan and Implementation Strategy
    ASSESSING POHNPEI LAND USE PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY by Carrie A. Hall Internship Report Submitted To Marine Resource Management Program College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331 1997 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Acknowledgments I would like to thank the University of Micronesia and South Pacific Program for providing me the opportunity to work on Pohnpei and be part of this exciting project. I would also like to express my appreciation for all those I worked with on Pohnpei and who contributed to this project, especially my counterparts Emensio Emperiam and Charles Aiken and fellow technical assistants for all for their help, support, and making my stay in Pohnpei wonderful. A special thanks also, to my advisor Jim Good and graduate committee members Bruce DeYoung and Flaxen Conway for their help and advice with the writing of this internship report. Lastly, I would like to thank my family for their support and all my friends who made my time in Corvallis enjoyable. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 BACKGROUND 3 Physical Setting 3 History . 7 Social Setting 9 Population 9 Schooling 9 Family . 10 Religion 10 Social Setting 10 Political Setting 11 Economic Setting 12 LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING IN POHNPEI 14 Previous Planning Attempts 14 Why Past Attempts May Have Failed and a Possible Remedy 15 Why Past Attempts May Have Failed . 15 Why Community Involvement is Needed 16 Types of Community Involvement . 17 A Possible Remedy . 19 Current Situation . 21 Organization and Initial Structure For Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • KAY, Paul, and Chad K. Mcdaniel, the Linguistic Significance of the Meanings of Basic Color Language,Terms
    7 8 Cecil H. Brown KAY, Paul, and Chad K. McDANIEL, The Linguistic Significance of the Meanings of Basic Color Language,Terms. 54:610-46. KEMPTON, Willett, 1978. Category Grading and Taxonomic Relations: a Mug Is a Sort ofAmerican Cup. Ethnologist, 5:44-65. ----------- , 1981. The Folk Classification of Ceramics: a Study of Cognitive Prototypes. New York, Academic Press. LAKOFF, George, 1987.Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about theChicago Mind. University Press. RANDALL, Robert A., 1977. Change and Variation in Samal Fishing: Making Plans to “Make a Living” in the Southern Philippines. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. ----------- , and Eugene S. HUNN, 1984. Do Life-forms Evolve or do Uses for Life? Some Doubts about Brown’s Universals Hypotheses.American Ethnologist, 11:329-49. ROSCH, Eleanor, 1975. Universals and Cultural Specifics in Human Categorization, in R.W. Brislin, S. Bochner, and W.J. Lonner (eds),Cross-cultural Perspectives on Learning: the Interface between Culture and Learning. New York, Halsted Press, pp. 177-206. ----------- , 1977. Human Categorization, in N. Warren (ed.),Studies in Cross-cultural Psychology, vol.l. New York, Academic Press, pp. 1-49. ----------- , and Carolyn B. MERVIS, 1975. Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7:573-605. WIERZBICKA, Anna, 1985.Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis. Ann Arbor, Karoma. WITKOWSKI, Stanley R., Cecil H. BROWN, and P. CHASE, 1981. Where do Tree Terms Come from?Man, (n.s.) 16:1-14. FINGOTA/FANGOTA: SHELLFISH AND FISHING IN POLYNESIA Ross Clark University of Auckland A few years ago, in the course of a brief foray into the shallows of marine ethnotaxonomy (Clark 1981),11 suggested the possibility of “shellfish” as a labelled life-form category in some Polynesian languages.
    [Show full text]