Electrochemical Synthesis of Peroxyacetic Acid Using Conductive

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

1 Electrochemical Synthesis of Peroxyacetic Acid using 2 Conductive Diamond Electrodes 3 Salvador Cotillas, Ana Sánchez-Carretero, Pablo Cañizares, Cristina Sáez and Manuel 4 Andrés Rodrigo*. 5 Department of Chemical Engineering. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Universidad de 6 Castilla-La Mancha. Campus Universitario s/n. 13071 Ciudad Real. Spain. 7 8 9 Abstract 10 In this work, the synthesis of peroxyacetic acid and peroxoacetate salts by electrolysis 11 with conductive-diamond anodes is described, using three different raw materials: 12 ethanol, acetaldehyde and sodium acetate. Results show that peroxyacetic acid is 13 produced at significant concentrations during the electrolyses of the three raw materials, 14 although sodium acetate achieves the highest efficiency and, at the same time, the 15 smallest carbon mineralization. Acetaldehyde behaves as a good raw material during a 16 first stage but afterwards it catalyses the decomposition of peroxoacetate to the acetate 17 anion. Moderate current densities and slightly alkaline pH seems to promote the 18 synthesis of peroxyacetic acid and to restrain raw matter mineralization. 19 20 Keywords: Electrosynthesis, peroxyacetic acid, conductive diamond 21 *To whom all correspondence should be addressed. 22 Tel. +34 902204100 ext 3411 23 Fax. +34 926 295256. 24 e-mail: [email protected] 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 31 1. Introduction 32 33 Peroxyacetic acid (PAA), also known as peracetic acid, is an organic peroxide in which 34 the carboxylic group of acetic acid (-COOH) is transformed into a peroxocarboxylic 35 group (- COOOH). It is a strong oxidant (E = 1.962 V vs SHE) with a reduction 36 potential larger than those of well- known oxidants, such as chlorine or chlorine 37 dioxide1. Depending on operating conditions, the PAA can present bleaching and 38 delignification properties2. For this reason, the PAA is used as bleaching agent and in 39 the industrial synthesis of epoxides2, 3. It is a very effective oxidant in water treatment4, 40 5. It is also used as a fowl sanitizer, and it is known to be a good disinfectant whose 41 action is based on the hydroxyl radical. PAA is a more potent antimicrobial agent than 42 hydrogen peroxide, being rapidly active at low concentrations against a wide spectrum 43 of microorganisms6-8. Thus, it has been found that hydrogen peroxide required much 44 larger doses than PAA for the same level of disinfection9. 45 46 PAA is commercially available in the form of a quaternary equilibrium mixture 47 containing acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, PAA, and water. It can be produced from 48 acetic acid and also from acetaldehyde. The first process (eq 1) consists of the oxidation 49 of acetic acid by means of hydrogen peroxide10-12, catalysed by sulphuric acid. It 50 requires long reaction times. 51 52 CH3COOH + H2O2 → CH3COOOH + H2O (1) 53 54 The second process uses acetaldehyde as raw matter. The oxidation of acetaldehyde 55 with air or oxygen produces the initiation of the reaction by means of an acetyl radical 2 56 which forms the peroxide radical with oxygen. The reaction ends with PAA formation13 57 according to eq. 2. 58 59 CH3CHO + O2 → CH3COOOH (2) 60 61 However, the peroxyacetic acid can experience a homolysis of the peroxide group and 62 become to acetic acid. In addition, it is supposed that peroxyacetic acid reacts with 63 acetaldehyde giving α-hydroxiethylperacetate. Later, for a cyclical mechanism of 64 transition, it dissociates itself in two molecules of acetic acid (eq. 3). Therefore, PAA 65 can be the main product if the oxidation is realized in soft conditions, preferably without 66 catalyst and in a solvent such as ethyl acetate. 67 OC H3C H O CHCH3CHO3CHO + + H H-O-O-O-O-CCH-CCH33 C C CH3 22 CH CH3COOH3COOH (3) (3) HO O O 68 69 70 In recent years, electrochemical oxidation with conductive-diamond anodes has become 71 one of the most promising technologies in the treatment of industrial wastes polluted 72 with organics14-24 and in the electrosynthesis of oxidants25-33. Compared with other 73 electrode materials, conductive-diamond has shown higher chemical and 74 electrochemical stability as well as a higher current efficiency. In addition, the high 75 overpotential for water electrolysis is one of the most important properties of 76 conductive-diamond in the processing of aqueous solutions; its electrochemical window 77 is sufficiently large to produce hydroxyl radicals with high efficiency34, and this species 78 seems to be directly involved in the oxidation mechanisms that occur on diamond 79 surfaces. As a result, conductive-diamond electro-oxidation of waste is presently 3 80 considered as an advanced oxidation technology. The advantageous properties described 81 above have led to great improvements (in both efficiency and electrode stability) in the 82 use of conductive diamond in the electrosynthesis of oxidants. A number of recent 83 studies have been published in which the generation of peroxodisulphates35, 84 peroxodiphosphate31, percarbonates36, ferrates32, 33 and perchlorates29 by electrochemical 85 techniques are described. Significant improvements are reported as compared to more 86 commonly used synthesis methods. 87 88 With this background in mind, the goal of the work described here was to investigate 89 the feasibility of generating peroxoacetic acid and its salts by electrolyses with 90 conductive-diamond electrodes. In an effort to achieve this aim, bench-scale 91 electrolysis assays of different raw material solutions on conductive diamond anodes 92 were carried out in order to characterize the mechanism of the process and to clarify the 93 role of the most significant process parameters (pH and current density). 94 95 2. Experimental. 96 97 2.1. Analytical procedures. Acetate standard solutions were prepared by dissolving the 98 appropriate amount of CH3COONa in water. Peroxyacetic acid was determined by 37 99 titration with Na2S2O3. The titration is based on the next procedure : 4 ml of a 25% 100 (v/v) H2SO4 solution were added to a l0 ml PAA sample. An excess of solid KI was 101 added and the iodide was oxidized by PAA to brownish iodine, then it was titrated with 102 0.01 M Na2S2O3 until only a pale brown color remained (eqs. 4 and 5). One drop of 1% 103 (w/v) starch solution was added and the titration was continued until complete 104 decolorization occurred. 4 - - + - 105 2I + CH3COOO + 2H → CH3COO + I2 + H2O (4) 106 I2 + 2Na2S2O3 → 2NaI + Na2S4O6 (5) 107 108 To dismiss the other oxidants and hydrogen peroxide presence, it was carried out 109 different analytical techniques such as gas chromatography and permanganate addition. 110 Gas chromatographic analyses were carried out in a column SUPELCOWAX 10 (30 m 111 x 0.25 mm) (macroporous particles with 0.25 µm diameter). Volume injection was set 112 to 10 μL. To oxidize hydrogen peroxide, 0.02 M KMnO4 solution was added until the 113 color of the solution turned pale rose. Oxidant stability rules out the hydroxyl radicals, 114 ozone and other unstable oxidants presence. Therefore the oxidant electrogenerated 115 comes from the partial oxidation of raw material forming a peroxo group. 116 117 2.2. Electrochemical cell. The electrosynthesis was carried out in a double- 118 compartment electrochemical flow cell. A cationic exchange membrane (STEREOM L- 119 105) was used to separate the compartments. Diamond-based material was used as 120 anode and stainless steel (AISI 304) as cathode. Both electrodes were circular (100 mm 121 diameter) with a geometric area of 78 cm2 each and an electrode gap of 15 mm. Boron- 122 doped diamond (BDD) films were provided by Adamant (Switzerland) and synthesised 123 by the hot filament chemical vapour deposition technique (HF CVD) on single-crystal 124 p-type Si <100> wafers (0.1 cm, Siltronix).The anolyte and the catholyte were stored 125 in dark glass tanks and circulated through the electrolytic cell by means of a centrifugal 126 pump. A heat exchanger was used to maintain the temperature at the desired set point. 127 The pH was monitored by means of the WTW-InoLab pHmeter. 128 5 129 2.3. Experimental Procedures. Bench scale electrolyses under galvanostatic conditions 130 were carried out to determine the influence of the main parameters in the process. The 131 anolyte and the catholyte consisted of 1 M solutions of ethanol (C2H6O), aceltadehyde 132 (C2H4O) or sodium acetate (CH3COONa). The range of current densities employed was 133 300 to 1000 A m-2. The range of pH studied was 1 to 13. 134 135 3. Results and discussion. 136 137 Figure 1 shows the influence of the raw matter with the applied electric charge, on the 138 production of PAA into the anodic chamber of a double compartment electrochemical 139 cell equipped with conductive-diamond anodes. This Figure also shows the 140 mineralization of carbon obtained during the same electrolyses. The experiments were 141 carried out with three different organic raw materials (ethanol, acetaldehyde and sodium 142 acetate in 1M aqueous solutions) at a current density of 300 A m-2, regulating the 143 temperature at 25oC during the process. As it can be observed, PAA can be obtained 144 from the three species tested with a significant production rate (C2H6O: 0.061 mmol/Ah; 145 C2H4O: 0.203 mmol/Ah; CH3COONa: 0.033 mmol/Ah). However, acetate behaves as 146 the best raw material, because it allows obtaining the best faradaic efficiencies in the 147 production of PAA and, at the same time, it obtains the lower mineralization 148 percentage. Initially, this can be easily interpreted in terms of the hydroxylation of the 149 carboxylic group by means of hydroxyl radicals produced on the surface of the diamond 150 surface (eq 6-9).
Recommended publications
  • The Decomposition Kinetics of Peracetic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide in Municipal Wastewaters

    The Decomposition Kinetics of Peracetic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide in Municipal Wastewaters

    Disinfection Forum No 10, October 2015 The Decomposition Kinetics of Peracetic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide in Municipal Wastewaters INTRODUCTION Efficient control of microbial populations in municipal wastewater using peracetic acid (PAA) requires an understanding of the PAA decomposition kinetics. This knowledge is critical to ensure the proper dosing of PAA needed to achieve an adequate concentration within the contact time of the disinfection chamber. In addition, the impact of PAA on the environment, post-discharge into the receiving water body, also is dependent upon the longevity of the PAA in the environment, before decomposing to acetic acid, oxygen and water. As a result, the decomposition kinetics of PAA may have a significant impact on aquatic and environmental toxicity. PAA is not manufactured as a pure compound. The solution exists as an equilibrium mixture of PAA, hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, and water: ↔ + + Acetic Acid Hydrogen Peroxide Peracetic Acid Water PeroxyChem’s VigorOx® WWT II Wastewater Disinfection Technology contains 15% peracetic acid by weight and 23% hydrogen peroxide as delivered. Although hydrogen peroxide is present in the formulation, peracetic acid is considered to be the active component for disinfection1 in wastewater. There have been several published studies investigating the decomposition kinetics of PAA in different water matrices, including municipal wastewater2-7. Yuan7 states that PAA may be consumed in the following three competitive reactions: 1. Spontaneous decomposition 2 CH3CO3H à 2 CH3CO2H + O2 Eq (1) 2. Hydrolysis CH3CO3H + H2O à CH3CO2H + H2O2 Eq (2) 3. Transition metal catalyzed decomposition + CH3CO3H + M à CH3CO2H + O2 + other products Eq (3) At neutral pH’s, both peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide can be rapidly consumed by these reactions7 (hydrogen peroxide will decompose to water and oxygen via 2H2O2 à 2H2O + O2).
  • Peracetic Acid Processing

    Peracetic Acid Processing

    Peracetic Acid Processing Identification Chemical Name(s): CAS Number: peroxyacetic acid, ethaneperoxic acid 79-21-0 Other Names: Other Codes: per acid, periacetic acid, PAA NIOSH Registry Number: SD8750000 TRI Chemical ID: 000079210 UN/ID Number: UN3105 Summary Recommendation Synthetic / Allowed or Suggested Non-Synthetic: Prohibited: Annotation: Synthetic Allowed (consensus) Allowed only for direct food contact for use in wash water. Allowed as a (consensus) sanitizer on surfaces in contact with organic food. (consensus) From hydrogen peroxide and fermented acetic acid sources only. (Not discussed by processing reviewers--see discussion of source under Crops PAA TAP review.) Characterization Composition: C2H4O3. Peracetic acid is a mixture of acetic acid (CH3COOH) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in an aqueous solution. Acetic acid is the principle component of vinegar. Hydrogen peroxide has been previously recommended by the NOSB for the National List in processing (synthetic, allowed at Austin, 1995). Properties: It is a very strong oxidizing agent and has stronger oxidation potential than chlorine or chlorine dioxide. Liquid, clear, and colorless with no foaming capability. It has a strong pungent acetic acid odor, and the pH is acid (2.8). Specific gravity is 1.114 and weighs 9.28 pounds per gallon. Stable upon transport. How Made: Peracetic acid (PAA) is produced by reacting acetic acid and hydrogen peroxide. The reaction is allowed to continue for up to ten days in order to achieve high yields of product according to the following equation. O O || || CH3-C-OH + H2O2 CH3C-O-OH + H2O acetic acid hydrogen peroxyacetic peroxide acid Due to reaction limitations, PAA generation can be up to 15% with residual levels of hydrogen peroxide (up to 25%) and acetic acid (up to 35%) with water up to 25%.
  • Peracetic Acid

    Peracetic Acid

    Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products Evaluation of active substances Assessment Report Peracetic acid Product-types 11 and 12 (Preservatives for liquid cooling and processing systems) (Slimicides) August 2016 Finland Peracetic acid Product-types 11 and 12 August 2016 CONTENTS 1. STATEMENT OF SUBJECT MATTER AND PURPOSE ........................................................ 2 1.1. Procedure followed ............................................................................................. 2 1.2. Purpose of the assessment report ....................................................................... 2 2. OVERALL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................... 4 2.1. Presentation of the Active Substance .................................................................. 4 2.1.1. Identity, Physico-Chemical Properties & Methods of Analysis ................. 4 2.1.2. Intended Uses and Efficacy ..................................................................... 7 2.1.3. Classification and Labelling ..................................................................... 8 2.2. Summary of the Risk Assessment ....................................................................... 9 2.2.1. Human Health Risk Assessment .............................................................. 9 2.2.1.1. Hazard identification ................................................................................... 9 2.2.1.2. Effects assessment ...................................................................................
  • Particularly Hazardous Substances

    Particularly Hazardous Substances

    Particularly Hazardous Substances In its Laboratory Standard, OSHA requires the establishment of additional protections for persons working with "Particularly Hazardous Substances" (PHS). OSHA defines these materials as "select" carcinogens, reproductive toxins and acutely toxic materials. Should you wish to add: explosive, violently reactive, pyrophoric and water-reactve materials to this category, the information is included. Carbon nanotubes have also been added due to their suspected carcinogenic properties. This table is designed to assist the laboratory in the identification of PHS, although it is not definitively conclusive or entirely comprehensive. *Notes on the proper use of this table appear on page 12. 1 6 5 2 3 4 Substance CAS National Toxicity National Program Carcinogen Toxin Acute Regulated OSHA Carcinogen Group IARC Carcinogen Toxin Reproductive Violently Reactive/ Explosive/Peroxide Forming/Pyrophoric A-a-C(2-Amino-9H-pyrido[2,3,b]indole) 2648-68-5 2B Acetal 105-57-7 yes Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 NTP AT 2B Acrolein (2-Propenal) 107-02-8 AT Acetamide 126850-14-4 2B 2-Acetylaminofluorene 53-96-3 NTP ORC Acrylamide 79-06-6 NTP 2B Acrylyl Chloride 814-68-6 AT Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 NTP ORC 2B Adriamycin 23214-92-8 NTP 2A Aflatoxins 1402-68-2 NTP 1 Allylamine 107-11-9 AT Alkylaluminums varies AT Allyl Chloride 107-05-1 AT ortho-Aminoazotoluene 97-56-3 NTP 2B para-aminoazobenzene 60-09-3 2B 4-Aminobiphenyl 92-67-1 NTP ORC 1 1-Amino-2-Methylanthraquinone 82-28-0 NTP (2-Amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole) 67730-11-4 2B
  • Peracetic Acid Bleaching CH CO H

    Peracetic Acid Bleaching CH CO H

    Peracetic Acid Bleaching CH3CO3H Introduction of Bleaching Bleaching is a chemical decoloration and delignification process carried out on various types of pulp. DliDelignifi cati on Removal of the chromophores At in dus tr ia l scal e, bl eachi ng i s perf ormed b y chl ori ne, chl ori ne dioxide, oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, ozone and peracetic acid. Effic iency: ClO2 = Cl2 = O3 >CH3COOOH > H2O2 >O> O2 Often bleaching chemicals are wasted in secondary reactions. D. Lachenal and C. Chirat, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 39, 5-6, 511-156 (2005) 2 Electron Exchange Theory Ring opening of the aromatic units necessitates the exchange of 4 e - # of e- can be exchanged per bleaching molecule - + O3 + 6 e + 6 H → 3 H2O - + - CCOlO2 + 55e e + 4 H → Cl + 2 H2O2 - + O2 + 4 e + 4 H → 2 H2O - + H2O2 + 2 e + 2 H → 2 H2O - + CH3COOOH + 2 e + 2 H → CH3COOH + H2O # of e- exchanged per molecule decreases in the following order: O3 > ClO2 > O2 > H2O2 = CH3COOOH D. Lachenal and C. Chirat, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 39, 5-6, 511-156 (2005) 3 Actual Electron Exchange - ClO2 and O3 100 g un bleac he d SW k raf t pul p, k appa # f rom 30 to ~ 4 -5 - 2.3% ClO2 (0.034 mole) on pulp: 0.034 x 5 = 0.17 e is exchanged - 14%1.4% O3 (0.03 mole)on pulp: 0 .03 x 6 = 018e0.18 e is exchanged Chemicals % consumed1 Kappa number * ClO2 2.3 4.5 O3 1.5 3.5 O3 1.4 5.0 O3 1.3 6.5 1Chemicals consumed are shown as % on pulp.
  • List of Extremely Hazardous Substances

    List of Extremely Hazardous Substances

    Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Facility Reporting Compliance Manual List of Extremely Hazardous Substances Threshold Threshold Quantity (TQ) Reportable Planning (pounds) Quantity Quantity (Industry Use (pounds) (pounds) CAS # Chemical Name Only) (Spill/Release) (LEPC Use Only) 75-86-5 Acetone Cyanohydrin 500 10 1,000 1752-30-3 Acetone Thiosemicarbazide 500/500 1,000 1,000/10,000 107-02-8 Acrolein 500 1 500 79-06-1 Acrylamide 500/500 5,000 1,000/10,000 107-13-1 Acrylonitrile 500 100 10,000 814-68-6 Acrylyl Chloride 100 100 100 111-69-3 Adiponitrile 500 1,000 1,000 116-06-3 Aldicarb 100/500 1 100/10,000 309-00-2 Aldrin 500/500 1 500/10,000 107-18-6 Allyl Alcohol 500 100 1,000 107-11-9 Allylamine 500 500 500 20859-73-8 Aluminum Phosphide 500 100 500 54-62-6 Aminopterin 500/500 500 500/10,000 78-53-5 Amiton 500 500 500 3734-97-2 Amiton Oxalate 100/500 100 100/10,000 7664-41-7 Ammonia 500 100 500 300-62-9 Amphetamine 500 1,000 1,000 62-53-3 Aniline 500 5,000 1,000 88-05-1 Aniline, 2,4,6-trimethyl- 500 500 500 7783-70-2 Antimony pentafluoride 500 500 500 1397-94-0 Antimycin A 500/500 1,000 1,000/10,000 86-88-4 ANTU 500/500 100 500/10,000 1303-28-2 Arsenic pentoxide 100/500 1 100/10,000 1327-53-3 Arsenous oxide 100/500 1 100/10,000 7784-34-1 Arsenous trichloride 500 1 500 7784-42-1 Arsine 100 100 100 2642-71-9 Azinphos-Ethyl 100/500 100 100/10,000 86-50-0 Azinphos-Methyl 10/500 1 10/10,000 98-87-3 Benzal Chloride 500 5,000 500 98-16-8 Benzenamine, 3-(trifluoromethyl)- 500 500 500 100-14-1 Benzene, 1-(chloromethyl)-4-nitro- 500/500
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/0372276 A1 HAN Et Al

    (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/0372276 A1 HAN Et Al

    US 20160372276A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/0372276 A1 HAN et al. (43) Pub. Date: Dec. 22, 2016 (54) A PRECIOUS METAL SWITCH CONTACT C2.5D 5/48 (2006.01) COMPONENT AND ITS PREPARATION C2.5D 3/48 (2006.01) METHOD C2.5D 3/46 (2006.01) C2.5D 5/02 (2006.01) (71) Applicant: NANTONG MEMTECH HIH II/04 (2006.01) TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD, C23C 8/42 (2006.01) Nantong (CN) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC ................ H01H I/02 (2013.01); H0IH II/04 (72) Inventors: Huisheng HAN, Nantong (CN); (2013.01); C23C 18/1605 (2013.01); C23C HONGMEI ZHANG, NANTONG 18/1689 (2013.01); C23C 18/42 (2013.01); (CN); YANG DING, NANTONG (CN); C25D 3/48 (2013.01); C25D 3/46 (2013.01); ZHIHONG DONG, NANTONG (CN); C25D 5/022 (2013.01); C25D 5/48 (2013.01) CHENG HUANG, NANTONG (CN) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 14/896,403 This invention discloses a preparation method for precious metal Switching contact components by means of plating (22) PCT Filed: Sep. 15, 2014 masking, plating and etching processes. The plating masking PCT/CN2014/090913 process is performed by using a plating mask ink with or (86). PCT No.: without a photo exposure machine. Plating of precious S 371 (c)(1), metals is performed by electroless plating or electro plating (2) Date: Dec. 7, 2015 methods. Etching is carried out with etching solutions con taining weak organic acids, weak inorganic acids or acidic (30) Foreign Application Priority Data buffering agents. Improvement of the etched Surface gloss and prevention of the side etching are realized with the Sep.
  • The Use of Peracetic Acid As a “Pre-Oxidant” for Drinking Water Applications

    The Use of Peracetic Acid As a “Pre-Oxidant” for Drinking Water Applications

    Disinfection Forum No. 18, September 2017 The Use of Peracetic Acid as a “Pre-Oxidant” for Drinking Water Applications BACKGROUND Chlorination as a technology for drinking water disinfection has significantly reduced the incidence of human disease and is one of the most significant contributions to the improvement of human health over the past century. Chlorine’s ability to provide a stable residual concentration makes it suitable as a drinking water disinfectant at the point of use. However, natural organic matter in the raw water being treated and disinfected at the drinking water treatment plant may interact with the residual chlorine to form compounds classified as disinfection by-products (DBPs). The most commonly employed disinfectants are chlorine, chlorine dioxide and ozone – each of which can generate a variety of DBPs. Many DBPs have been identified as potential cancer-causing agents, and include trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs). Examples of THMS and HAAs include: chloroform, dibromochloromethane, bromoform, trichloracetic acid, monchloracetic acid and monobromoacetic acid. Peracetic acid (PAA) has gained momentum in the United States as a primary wastewater disinfection technology and alternative to chlorine. PAA has low residual toxicity, does not form harmful DBPs and has minimal impact on the environment. While the lack of a stable residual reduces its environmental impact post wastewater treatment, this characteristic decreases its values as a terminal drinking water disinfection technology – PAA residual at the point of use would be impractical to maintain. However, PAA may potentially be used in a disinfection treatment train approach as an early stage disinfection chemistry coupled with other methods such as membrane filtration, ozone and UV.
  • Tg-Pesticides-E.Pdf

    Tg-Pesticides-E.Pdf

    Technical guidelines on the environmentally sound management of wastes consisting of, containing or contaminated with the pesticides aldrin, chlordane, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, hexachlorobenzene (HCB), mirex or toxaphene or with HCB as an industrial chemical K0760095 230307 Contents I. Introduction .............................................................................................................5 A. Scope .............................................................................................................5 B. Description, production, use and wastes ......................................................................5 1. Aldrin .............................................................................................................5 (a) Description ..........................................................................................5 (b) Production...........................................................................................5 (c) Use.......................................................................................................6 2. Chlordane.........................................................................................................6 (a) Description ..........................................................................................6 (b) Production...........................................................................................6 (c) Use.......................................................................................................6 3. Dieldrin............................................................................................................7
  • 2.2.Uncatalysed Formation of Peracetic Acid from Hydrogen Peroxide and Acetic Acid

    2.2.Uncatalysed Formation of Peracetic Acid from Hydrogen Peroxide and Acetic Acid

    Peroxide Reactions of Environmental Relevance in Aqueous Solution MELOD MOHAMED Ali UNIS PhD 2010 i Peroxide Reactions of Environmental Relevance in Aqueous Solution MELOD MOHAMED Ali UNIS PhD 2010 ii Peroxide Reactions of Environmental Relevance in Aqueous Solution A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Northumbria at Newcastle For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Research undertaken in the School of Applied Sciences at Northumbria University Oct 2010 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, all praise be to God, Lord of the Universe, the most beneficent, the most merciful who has blessed me through my life with health, patience and ability to pursue and complete this work. I would like to express utmost appreciation to my supervisors Dr. Michael Deary and Dr. Martin Davies for their guidance and cooperation throughout this work, and also special thanks to Dr Michael Deary for his patience, endless support, excellent guidance, and helpful comments throughout my PhD writing. He has always provided valuable, challenging and constructive comments which have encourage me to improve my research skills and demonstrate the work precisely. I would like to thanks Mr Gary Askwith, for his assistance during this research work. I am particularly indebted to the people of my country Libya, who provided me with the opportunity to continue higher studies. I would like to acknowledge my gratitude to the Ministry of Education for the financial support to accomplish this study, which otherwise was impossible to be achieved. Therefore, I wish to be able to repay at least a portion of this debt to my home country.
  • (Rqs) for EPCRA Section 302(A)(2) Extremely Hazardous Substances

    (Rqs) for EPCRA Section 302(A)(2) Extremely Hazardous Substances

    § 355.50 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–01 Edition) of this paragraph, a transportation-re­ with the requirements of § 355.40 shall lated release means a release during be subject to civil penalties of up to transportation, or storage incident to $25,000 for each day during which the transportation if the stored substance violation continues, in accordance with is moving under active shipping papers section 325(b)(2) of the Act. In the case and has not reached the ultimate con­ of a second or subsequent violation, signee. any such person may be subject to civil [52 FR 13395, Apr. 22, 1987, as amended at 54 penalties of up to $75,000 for each day FR 22543, May 24, 1989; 55 FR 30188, July 24, the violation continues, in accordance 1990; 63 FR 13475, Mar. 19, 1998; 64 FR 13115, with section 325(b)(2) of the Act. Mar. 17, 1999] (c) Criminal penalties. Any person who knowingly and willfully fails to pro- § 355.50 Penalties. vide notice in accordance with § 355.40 (a) Civil penalties. Any person who shall, upon conviction, be fined not fails to comply with the requirements more than $25,000 or imprisoned for not of § 355.40 shall be subject to civil pen­ more than two (2) years, or both (or, in alties of up to $25,000 for each violation the case of a second or subsequent con­ in accordance with section 325(b)(1) of viction, shall be fined not more than the Act. $50,000 or imprisoned for not more than (b) Civil penalties for continuing viola­ five (5) years, or both) in accordance tions.
  • Chemical Compatibility Storage Group

    Chemical Compatibility Storage Group

    CHEMICAL SEGREGATION Chemicals are to be segregated into 11 different categories depending on the compatibility of that chemical with other chemicals The Storage Groups are as follows: Group A – Compatible Organic Acids Group B – Compatible Pyrophoric & Water Reactive Materials Group C – Compatible Inorganic Bases Group D – Compatible Organic Acids Group E – Compatible Oxidizers including Peroxides Group F– Compatible Inorganic Acids not including Oxidizers or Combustible Group G – Not Intrinsically Reactive or Flammable or Combustible Group J* – Poison Compressed Gases Group K* – Compatible Explosive or other highly Unstable Material Group L – Non-Reactive Flammable and Combustible, including solvents Group X* – Incompatible with ALL other storage groups The following is a list of chemicals and their compatibility storage codes. This is not a complete list of chemicals, but is provided to give examples of each storage group: Storage Group A 94‐75‐7 2,4‐D (2,4‐Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) 94‐82‐6 2,4‐DB 609-99-4 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid 64‐19‐7 Acetic acid (Flammable liquid @ 102°F avoid alcohols, Amines, ox agents see SDS) 631-61-8 Acetic acid, Ammonium salt (Ammonium acetate) 108-24-7 Acetic anhydride (Flammable liquid @102°F avoid alcohols see SDS) 79‐10‐7 Acrylic acid Peroxide Former 65‐85‐0 Benzoic acid 98‐07‐7 Benzotrichloride 98‐88‐4 Benzoyl chloride 107-92-6 Butyric Acid 115‐28‐6 Chlorendic acid 79‐11‐8 Chloroacetic acid 627‐11‐2 Chloroethyl chloroformate 77‐92‐9 Citric acid 5949-29-1 Citric acid monohydrate 57-00-1 Creatine 20624-25-3