DOCSLIB.ORG

Wilhelm Dilthey's Conceptualization of Mental Life: the Unity Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wilhelm Dilthey's Conceptualization of Mental Life: the Unity Of WILHELM DILTHEY’S CONCEPTUALIZATION OF MENTAL LIFE: THE UNITY OF CONSCIOUSNESS STEFAN MAJUMDAR A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN PSYCHOLOGY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO FEBRUARY 2019 ã STEFAN MAJUMDAR 2019 ii Abstract This study is an examination of Wilhelm Dilthey’s conceptualization of mental life. An introduction recounting Dilthey’s intellectual background is provided, including a detailed literature review of texts that elaborate his ideas. A description of Dilthey’s analysis of the elemental constituents of consciousness is presented. Dilthey’s assessment of self-consciousness is examined, and his psychological epistemology is explained. A discussion of Dilthey’s analysis of logic and psychological processes is given. The study explicates Dilthey’s position on the relation between aspects and dynamics within the psyche. A justification of Dilthey’s distinction between mental and physical objects of psychological investigation is provided. Consciousness is shown to constitute a phenomenal unity. Examples of the relevance of Dilthey’s ideas for contemporary psychological theory and practice are presented. Findings are recounted providing a detailed picture of main conclusions drawn from the study. Keywords: Wilhelm Dilthey, consciousness, self-consciousness, conscious unity, experience, hermeneutics, phenomenology, descriptive psychology, explanatory science, history, clinical psychology iii This Work is Dedicated to my Loving Father Salindra Kumar Majumdar and Sister, Susanne Majumder-Lammers iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ………………………………………………………………………….... ii Dedication ……………………………………………………………………………………... iii Table of Contents …………....................................................................................... iv 1. DILTHEY’S BACKGROUND AND INTELLECTUAL ORIENTATION ……............ 1 1.01 Dilthey’s Background ………………………………………………………….... 1 1.02 Hermeneutics and Phenomenology .………..…………………………………... 9 1.02.01 Thematic Introduction to Hermeneutics ……………………………... 9 1.02.02 Dilthey and Hermeneutics ……………………………………………. 12 1.02.03 Thematic Introduction to Phenomenology ………………………….... 15 1.02.04 Dilthey and Phenomenology …………………………………………. 18 1.03 The Historical Context of Dilthey’s Approach to Science .……………………. 19 1.03.01 Dilthey on Explanatory Psychology …………………………………. 23 1.03.02 Descriptive Psychology and the Human Sciences …………………… 25 1.04 Literature Review: An Extended Introduction to Dilthey’s Thought ………….. 31 2. THE FORM AND FOUNDATIONS OF CONSCIOUSNESS ………………………. 85 2.01 The Facts of Consciousness ……………………………………………………. 85 2.01.01 Experience and Consciousness ………………………………………. 85 2.01.02 The Ultimate Fundamental Datum of Psychic Life Given in Experience ……………………………………………………………. 88 2.01.03 The Facts of Consciousness Represent the Starting Point of the Description of Consciousness ………………………………………………….. 89 v 2.02 The Principle of Phenomenality ………………………………………………... 91 2.02.01 Dilthey’s Conceptualization of Phenomenality …………………….... 91 2.02.02 The Concepts Internal and External in Dilthey’s Conceptualization of Consciousness ……………………………………………………….... 93 3. SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS .......................................................................................... 100 3.01 Self-Consciousness: The Historical and Theoretical Context ………………... 100 3.01.01 Dilthey’s Treatment of the Historical Significance of Self-Consciousness ...………………………………………………………………………………... 100 3.01.02 Dilthey’s Analysis and Critique of Kant’s Conceptualization of Self- Consciousness ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 101 3.02 Dilthey’s Conceptualization of Self-Consciousness …………………………... 107 3.02.01 Self-Feeling, Reflexive Awareness, and Being-for-Oneself ……….... 107 3.02.02 Subject and Object in Dilthey’s Conceptualization of Self- Consciousness ..……………………………………………………………………………….... 112 4. DILTHEY’S PSYCHOLOGICAL EPISTEMOLOGY ……………………............... 116 4.01 The Given as the Starting Point of Psychology ……………………………..... 116 4.01.01 The Given ………………………………………………………….... 116 4.02 The Psychic Nexus: The Relation of Minds ...................................................... 119 4.02.01 The Psychic Nexus …………………………………………………... 119 vi 4.02.02 The Psychic Nexus as a Foundational Concept for Dilthey’s Psychological Epistemology ………................................................... 124 4.03 Sensation, Perception, and Representation ……................................................ 126 4.03.01 Kant and Brentano as Critical Background for Dilthey’s Psychology ….………………………………………………………………………………. 126 4.03.02 Dilthey on the Aspects of Consciousness …………………………... 130 4.04 Awareness and Attentiveness: Dilthey and the Question of the Unconscious …..…………………………………………………………………………….... 137 4.04.01 Dilthey’s Characterization of Theories of the Unconscious ……....... 137 4.04.02 Dilthey’s Analysis of the Question of the Unconscious …………..... 138 5. LOGIC, THOUGHT, PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES AND CONTENTS: THE UNITY OF CONSCIOUSNESS ………………………………………………......... 147 5.01 Logic and Thought ……………………………………………………….......... 147 5.01.01 Logical Operations ……………………………………………......... 147 5.02 The Phenomenal Analysis of Psychological Processes, Psychological Contents, and Physiological Perspectives ……………………………..……………....... 155 5.02.01 Dilthey’s Critical Treatment of Physiological / Experimental Analysis in Sensation and Perception Including a Phenomenological Analysis of These …………………………………………................................... 156 5.02.02 Sensation, Perception, and Phenomenal Consciousness in General …..………………………………………………………………….... 162 5.02.03 Sensation, Perception, and the Unity of Consciousness ………......... 164 vii 5.03 Psychological Contents, Psychological Processes, and the Unity of Consciousness ………………………………………………………………… 169 5.03.01 The Objective Nexus ………………………………………………... 169 5.03.02 The Psychic Act and Psychic Contents ……………………………... 171 5.03.03 The Epistemology of the Psychic Act …………………………......... 173 5.03.04 The Analytic and Genetic Analysis of Psychological Contents: The Epistemology of Psychological Contents ……………………… 183 5.03.05 The Psychic Act and the Unity of Consciousness …………….......... 184 6. THE CONTINUED RELEVANCE OF DILTHEY’S CONCEPTUALIZATION OF CONSCIOUSNESS FOR CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY …………………...……………………. 186 6.01.01 Introduction …………………………………………………………. 186 6.01.02 Gordon Allport ……………………………………………………… 187 6.02 Clinical Applications …………………………………………......................... 190 6.02.01 Psychoanalysis ……………………………………………………… 190 6.02.02 Person Centered Therapy …………………………………………… 194 7. CONCLUSION ……………………………………………………………………… 199 7.01 Dilthey’s Theoretical Orientation and His Conceptualization of Consciousness ….......................................................................................................................... 199 7.01.01 Phenomenology and Dilthey’s Conceptualization of Consciousness ….......................................................................................................................... 199 viii 7.01.02 Hermeneutics and Dilthey’s Conceptualization of Consciousness …..…………………………………………………………………………….... 200 7.01.03 Dilthey’s Conceptualization of Consciousness and Explanatory Science ............................................................................................................................. 201 7.02 Findings ………………………………………………………………… 202 REFERENCES ……………………………………………………… 213 1 Dilthey’s Background and Intellectual Orientation Wilhelm Dilthey (1833-1911) was a nineteenth century German philosopher and psychologist. He was a proponent of a scientific system dedicated to the study of human mental, emotional, social, and historical life known as the Geisteswissenschaften, or the Human Sciences. Dilthey’s approach to the human sciences primarily employs hermeneutic and phenomenological method in analyzing and describing subject matter. For Dilthey, psychology represented a potentially foundational discipline for the human sciences. The following study is a detailed examination of Dilthey’s conceptualization of the category consciousness, with emphasis on the principle of the overarching unity of it. The work describes and discusses a series of concepts regarding Dilthey’s systematic thinking on this subject. The study begins with an explication of Dilthey’s most essential concepts on the form and contents of consciousness. It moves progressively towards an application of these to his psychological epistemology, and practical contexts in which many of his ideas are employed. The central thesis to be proven in this study is expressed in the assertion that Dilthey’s conceptualization of consciousness demonstrates and maintains the principle of the unity of consciousness. It will be shown that Dilthey accomplishes this while describing expressed aspects of the psyche without theoretical contradiction. This will be accomplished while demonstrating the roles of the integrating concepts elaborated in that theoretical dialectic. Dilthey’s Background Before directly engaging with the question of consciousness in Dilthey’s writing, it is essential to review his personal and intellectual background. Dilthey’s theoretical orientation is informed by a rich set of historical, scientific, and philosophical influences. 2 Wilhelm Dilthey was born on November 19, 1833 in the western Rhine region, German town of Biebrich. Dilthey’s father was an Evangelical Protestant minister of the Reformed Evangelical Church,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2012 The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Joseph Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Joseph, "The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno" (2012). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 125. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/125 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy October, 2011 By Joseph Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois 2 ABSTRACT Joseph Weiss Title: The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Critical Theory demands that its forms of critique express resistance to the socially necessary illusions of a given historical period. Yet theorists have seldom discussed just how much it is the case that, for Walter Benjamin and Theodor W.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel's Apocrypha
    Chapter 3 Hegel’s Apocrypha 1 A Rediscovery The term Jugendschriften—writings of youth, is used to refer to a series of texts and fragments produced during Hegel’s years as student and private tutor from the period 1793 to 1800 which he did not himself publish. In 1801 Hegel moved to Jena with the help of Schelling, published his first book, took his habilitation and began his academic career. The Jugendschriften were first published by Hermann Nohl in 1907.1 Nohl was a student of Wilhelm Dilthey (1833–1911), the advocate of the philosophy of life and of hermeneutics, who is also important as one of the founders of historicism. Dilthey himself held the view that a phi- losophy is best described in terms of the history of its development and hence that the biography of a philosopher is often the key to his philosophy. In 1905 he published a work with the title Die Jugendgeschichte Hegels—The history of the young Hegel,2 which was based on the documents in the Royal Prussian Library in Berlin that Nohl published two years later. Dilthey’s concern with Hegel’s early works was thoroughly determined by his own philosophy. For instance, he found that Hegel’s interest in the importance of biography to his- tory was comparable to his own. Hegel had written a Life of Jesus, which means that Hegel tried, just as Dilthey did in the history of philosophy, to consider Jesus Christ not as a dogmatic ‘object’ of theology, but historically, as a matter for historical investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Jürgen Habermas and the Third Reich Max Schiller Claremont Mckenna College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2012 Jürgen Habermas and the Third Reich Max Schiller Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Schiller, Max, "Jürgen Habermas and the Third Reich" (2012). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 358. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/358 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction The formation and subsequent actions of the Nazi government left a devastating and indelible impact on Europe and the world. In the midst of general technological and social progress that has occurred in Europe since the Enlightenment, the Nazis represent one of the greatest social regressions that has occurred in the modern world. Despite the development of a generally more humanitarian and socially progressive conditions in the western world over the past several hundred years, the Nazis instigated one of the most diabolic and genocidal programs known to man. And they did so using modern technologies in an expression of what historian Jeffrey Herf calls “reactionary modernism.” The idea, according to Herf is that, “Before and after the Nazi seizure of power, an important current within conservative and subsequently Nazi ideology was a reconciliation between the antimodernist, romantic, and irrantionalist ideas present in German nationalism and the most obvious manifestation of means ...modern technology.” 1 Nazi crimes were so extreme and barbaric precisely because they incorporated modern technologies into a process that violated modern ethical standards. Nazi crimes in the context of contemporary notions of ethics are almost inconceivable.
    [Show full text]
  • Verstehen for Sociology: Comment on Watts
    Verstehen for Sociology: Comment on Watts The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Turco, Catherine J. and Zuckerman, Ezra W. “Verstehen for Sociology: Comment on Watts.” American Journal of Sociology 122, 4 (January 2017): 1272–1291 © 2017 University of Chicago As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/690762 Publisher University of Chicago Press Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113217 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. Commentary and Debate To conserve space for the publication of original contributions to schol- arship, the comments in this section must be limited to brief critiques; au- thor replies must be concise as well. Comments are expected to address specific substantive errors or flaws in articles published in AJS. They are subject to editorial board approval and peer review. Only succinct and substantive commentary will be considered; longer or less focused papers should be submitted as articles in their own right. AJS does not publish rebuttals to author replies. VERSTEHEN FOR SOCIOLOGY: COMMENT ON WATTS1 INTRODUCTION Duncan Watts, in “Common Sense and Sociological Explanations” (AJS 120 [2014]: 313–51) has done our field a great service by raising a question at the heart of the sociological enterprise: What makes for valuable sociology, and when does it improve upon commonsense explanations? Watts makes three key observations that we believe are quite productive to contemplate.
    [Show full text]
  • Husserl's Position Between Dilthey and the Windelband-Rickert School of Neo-Kantianism John E
    Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Faculty Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Publications 4-1988 Husserl's Position Between Dilthey and the Windelband-Rickert School of Neo-Kantianism John E. Jalbert Sacred Heart University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/rel_fac Part of the Philosophy of Mind Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Jalbert, John E. "Husserl's Position Between Dilthey and the Windelband-Rickert School of Neo-Kantianism." Journal of the History of Philosophy 26.2 (1988): 279-296. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +XVVHUO V3RVLWLRQ%HWZHHQ'LOWKH\DQGWKH:LQGHOEDQG5LFNHUW 6FKRRORI1HR.DQWLDQLVP John E. Jalbert Journal of the History of Philosophy, Volume 26, Number 2, April 1988, pp. 279-296 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\7KH-RKQV+RSNLQV8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV DOI: 10.1353/hph.1988.0045 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/hph/summary/v026/26.2jalbert.html Access provided by Sacred Heart University (5 Dec 2014 12:35 GMT) Husserl's Position Between Dilthey and the Windelband- Rickert School of Neo- Kanuamsm JOHN E. JALBERT THE CONTROVERSY AND DEBATE over the character of the relationship between the natural and human sciences (Natur- und Geisteswissenschaflen) became a central theme for philosophical reflection largely through the efforts of theo- rists such as Wilhelm Dilthey and the two principal representatives of the Baden School of Neo-Kantians, Wilhelm Windelband and Heinrich Rickert.~ These turn of the century theorists are major figures in this philosophical arena, but they are by no means the only participants in the effort to grapple with this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER the Sociological Perspective
    1CHAPTER The Sociological Perspective SYNOPSIS What Is Sociology? • The Sociological Imagination • Sociology and Popular Wisdom • Sociology and the Other Social Sciences The Development of Sociology • Auguste Comte • Herbert Spencer • Karl Marx • Emile Durkheim • Max Weber • Harriet Martineau The Development of Sociology in America The Major Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology • Structural Functional Theory • Confl ict Theory • Symbolic Interaction Theory • Exchange Theory • Evolutionary Theory • Additional Theoretical Perspectives and the Future of Sociological Theory 1.1 WHAT IS SOCIOLOGY? What is sociology ? Sociology is the scientifi c study of human behavior, social groups, and society. Sociology is concerned with every aspect of the self in relationships with others and every aspect of the social world that affects a person’s thoughts or actions. As stated by the American Sociological Association in a booklet titled 21st Century Careers with an Undergraduate Degree in Sociology (2009), sociology is the study of social life and the social causes and consequences of human behavior. The term social life encom- passes all interpersonal relationships, all groups or collections of persons, and all types of Sociology social organizations. The “causes and consequences of human behavior” encompass how The study of human society and social life and the social these relationships, groups, and organizations are interrelated; how they infl uence per- causes and consequences of sonal and interpersonal behavior; how they affect and are affected by the larger society; human behavior 3 4 Chapter 1 Focal Point THE SOCIOLOGY OF RAMPAGE SHOOTING Mass killings seem to be occurring more often now than in the against gun control, as means of curtailing violence, result.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilhelm Dilthey's Doctrine of World Views and Its Relationship to Hermeneutics
    David Naugle Philosophy 5329/501 Hermeneutics Spring 1993 University of Texas at Arlington Dr. Charles Nussbaum WILHELM DILTHEY'S DOCTRINE OF WORLD VIEWS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO HERMENEUTICS INTRODUCTION Wilhelm Dilthey (1833-1911), whom José Ortega y Gasset called "the most im- portant philosopher in the second half of the nineteenth century"1 (1946: 131), was a man of passion, vision, and calling. The great crises of his age gripped his soul and propelled him on an intellectual and spiritual journey in quest of solutions to the prob- lems of Western culture at his moment in history. Here is his own personal testimony to the single-minded objective of his life. The great crisis of the sciences and European culture which we are now living through has so deeply and totally taken possession of my spirit that the desire to be of some help in it has extinguished every extraneous and personal ambition (JD vii; in Ermath 1978: 15). This crisis of modernity, of mammoth proportions to Dilthey who described it as "a shaking of human society and its foundations such as has not been seen since the declining days of the Greco-Roman world" (GS 6: 246), could be called a Streit der Weltanschauung—a clash, or "protracted crisis of consciousness or 'world view'" (Ermath 1978: 15). Dilthey lived through "the Hegelsstreit, Religionsstreit, Materialis 1 This is no small compliment when we realize that the competitors for this distinction include J. S. Mill, C. Darwin, H. Spencer, H. Bergson, K. Marx, F. Engels, J. Royce, F. Bradley, A. N.
    [Show full text]
  • Three DECONSTRUCTION and HERMENEUTICS. on THE
    Three DECONSTRUCTION AND HERMENEUTICS. ON THE CONTROVERSY BETWEEN JACQUES DERRIDA AND HANS-GEORG GADAMER Piotr Dehnel In his Songs of Experience, Martin Jay1 cites Jacques Derrida’s critical assessment of the fact that experience has always been referred to in terms of metaphysics of presence, which he finds both in Edmund Husserl’s experience of meaning and in Emmanuel Levinas’s utterances about experiencing the other or a difference. Jay reflects also on the 1981 debate between Derrida and Hans- Georg Gadamer and stresses Derrida’s objections to the hermeneutical reliance on the dialogic experience. In this paper I would like to have a closer look at the aforementioned debate and shed some light on the question whether Gadamer’s hermeneutics can be grasped in the categories of the metaphysics of presence. Gadamer, the founding father of philosophical hermeneutics, and Derrida, the founding father of deconstruction, met in April 1981 in the Goethe Institute in Paris during the Text and Interpretation Symposium organized by Philippe Forget.2 Inaugurating the symposium with an eponymous paper, Gadamer discussed various elements of his own intellectual biography, which commenced with a critique of idealism and methodologism of the prior epistemological theory and was decisively influenced by his encounter with Martin Heidegger’s philosophical thought. Heidegger, namely, broke with Wilhelm Dilthey’s concept of understanding as a method of humanities and made it into an existential, i.e. into a basic determinant of the human Dasein. For Heideggger, understanding is simply a certain mode of being, and not a mode of knowledge. Such formulation enabled Gadamer to include the experience of art and the experience of history into the sphere of hermeneutics, both types of experience culminating in the concept of historically effected consciousness (wirkunggeschichtliches Bewußtsein).
    [Show full text]
  • Immanuel Kant and the Development of Modern Psychology David E
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Psychology Faculty Publications Psychology 1982 Immanuel Kant and the Development of Modern Psychology David E. Leary University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/psychology-faculty- publications Part of the Theory and Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Leary, David E. "Immanuel Kant and the Development of Modern Psychology." In The Problematic Science: Psychology in Nineteenth- Century Thought, edited by William Ray Woodward and Mitchell G. Ash, 17-42. New York, NY: Praeger, 1982. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychology at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Psychology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Immanuel Kant and the Development of Modern Psychology David E. Leary Few thinkers in the history of Western civilization have had as broad and lasting an impact as Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). This "Sage of Konigsberg" spent his entire life within the confines of East Prussia, but his thoughts traveled freely across Europe and, in time, to America, where their effects are still apparent. An untold number of analyses and commentaries have established Kant as a preeminent epistemologist, philosopher of science, moral philosopher, aestheti­ cian, and metaphysician. He is even recognized as a natural historian and cosmologist: the author of the so-called Kant-Laplace hypothesis regarding the origin of the universe. He is less often credited as a "psychologist," "anthropologist," or "philosopher of mind," to Work on this essay was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Experience of Meaning and Hermeneutics
    THE EXPERIENCE OF MEANING AND HERMENEUTICS Vasile Macoviciuc∗∗∗ [email protected] Abstract : The author sustains the necessity/possibility of a theoretical- methodological complementarity among structuralism, semiotics, and hermeneutics within the effort to conceptualize meaning as existential experience. These analytic perspectives must be also received as contributions pertaining to the sphere of the ontology of the humane. Keywords : semiotics, understanding/comprehension, interpretation, hermeneutics, meaning, language. “Language – notes Hans-Georg Gadamer – is the environment in which the I and the world unite or rather in which we are presented with their primal [co]-belonging.” 1 Due to this multi-dimensional symbiosis, the grasping of meaning cannot be a purely intellectual operation, but “engages the entire human being” 2, assuming the recognition of some methodological criteria, very different as source, significance or comprehensive goal. If the structural method and semiotics are relatively recent in European culture, hermeneutics had a historical evolution from antiquity on, receiving changes that seriously affected its theoretical shape, fields of problems, and stakes. Schleiermacher is taken as the founder of modern hermeneutics since, on the one hand, he believes that this can no longer be reduced to its traditional realm (interpretation of the Bible), but covers the large field of moral sciences and, on the other hand, it notices the fact that the understanding of the part (the element) is conditioned by the understanding of the text as a whole. His intention is to ground a general theory of the art of understanding and interpretation that unifies and guides the special hermeneutics. This is why he displays the phenomena of language: what must (and can) be assumed within the hermeneutic act and what can be discovered in and by it is no more than language.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Positivism, Interpretivism and Critical Theory
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Introduction to positivism, interpretivism and critical theory Journal Item How to cite: Ryan, Gemma (2018). Introduction to positivism, interpretivism and critical theory. Nurse Researcher, 25(4) pp. 41–49. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c [not recorded] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Accepted Manuscript Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.7748/nr.2018.e1466 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Introduction to positivist, interpretivism & critical theory Abstract Background There are three commonly known philosophical research paradigms used to guide research methods and analysis: positivism, interpretivism and critical theory. Being able to justify the decision to adopt or reject a philosophy should be part of the basis of research. It is therefore important to understand these paradigms, their origins and principles, and to decide which is appropriate for a study and inform its design, methodology and analysis. Aim To help those new to research philosophy by explaining positivism, interpretivism and critical theory. Discussion Positivism resulted from foundationalism and empiricism; positivists value objectivity and proving or disproving hypotheses. Interpretivism is in direct opposition to positivism; it originated from principles developed by Kant and values subjectivity. Critical theory originated in the Frankfurt School and considers the wider oppressive nature of politics or societal influences, and often includes feminist research.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of Values and Morality in Global Times
    Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series III, Asian Philosophical Studies, Volume 34 Reconstruction of Values and Morality in Global Times Chinese Philosophical Studies, XXXIV Edited by Liu Yong & Zhang Zhixiang The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Copyright © 2018 by The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Gibbons Hall B-20 620 Michigan Avenue, NE Washington, D.C. 20064 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Names: Liu, Yong, 1958- editor. Title: Reconstruction of values and morality in global times / edited by Liu Yong, Zhang Zhixiang. Description: First edition. | Washington, DC : The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 2018. | Series: Cultural heritage and contemporary change series III. Asian philosophical studies ; Volume 34 | Series: Chinese philosophical studies ; XXXIV | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018009470 | ISBN 9781565183278 (pbk. : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Philosophy, Chinese--21st century. | Values. | Ethics. | Philosophy--History--21st century. Classification: LCC B5231 .R43 2018 | DDC 181/.11--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018009470 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Liu Yong & Zhang Zhixiang 1. Confucian Altruism, Generosity and Justice: 13 A Response to Globalization Vincent Shen 2. On the New Features of Cultural Diversity and 29 the Building of a Value Consensus Xie Xiaojuan 3. Human Desire and International Global Capitalism: 41 Challenges and Opportunities Edward Alam 4. Freedom in the Core Values of Contemporary China 51 Yuan Jiuhong 5. Anti-Essentialism and Tathagatagarbha: A Parallel between 65 “Critical Buddhism” and Continental Philosophy Tu Xiaofei 6. The “Non Inscription” Phenomenon: A Modern Way 75 of Avoiding a Reconstruction of Values Alexandre Palma 7.
    [Show full text]