DOCSLIB.ORG

Jamie Stern-Weiner Tis Ebook Edition Published by Verso 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

anti-semitism and the labour party Anti-Semitism and the Labour Party Edited by Jamie Stern-Weiner Tis ebook edition published by Verso 2019 All rights reserved Te moral rights of the authors have been asserted Verso UK: 6 Meard St, London, W1F 0EG US: 20 Jay St, Suite 1010, Brooklyn, NY 11201 versobooks.com Verso is the imprint of New Lef Books ISBN-13: 978-1-78960-671-3 ‘Corbyn Under Fire’ and ‘Te Never Ending Story’, © Daniel Finn 2018, frst appeared in Jacobin. ‘Jeremy Corbyn is an Anti-Racist, Not an Anti-Semite’ © Jospehn Finlay, 2019, frst appeared in Times of Israel. 'Smoke Without Fire: Te Myth of the 'Labour Antisemitism Crisis’ © Jamie Stern-Weiner and Alan Maddison, 2019. ‘Te Chimera of British Anti-Semitism (and How Not to Fight It if it Were Real)’, frst appeared on Verso Blog © Norman Finkelstein, 2019; ’60 Times Jeremy Corbyn Stood with Jewish People’ © @ToryFibs; ‘Briefng for Canvassers: Challenging false allegations of antisemitism’ and ‘Te Riverside Scandal’ with permission from Jewish Voice for Labour; ‘A Disinformation Campaign’ © Media Reform Coalition, 2019; ‘Te Fake News Nazi: Corbyn, Williamson and the Anti-Semitism Scandal’ from Medians © David Edwards, 2019; ‘Is the Guardian Institutionally Antisemitic?’ and ‘Labour Party Conference or Nuremberg Rally? Assessing the Evidence’ from author’s blog, © Jamie Stern-Weiner 2019; ‘Hue and Cry over the UCU’ © Richard Kuper 2019; with permission of OpenDemocracy; ‘Why the Labour Party Should Not Adopt the IHRA Defnition or Any Other Defnition of Antisemitism’ from author’s blog, © 2019 Norman Finkelstein, 2019; ‘When Jews are Just Fodder for the Tory Propaganda Machine’, © Antony Lerman 2019, with permission from Open Democracy; ‘Antisemitism, Cosmopolitanism and the Politics of Labour’s “Old” and “New” Right-Wings’, © Jeremy Gilbert 2019, with permission from OpenDemocracy; ‘Critiques of Elite Power Aren’t Antisemitic or Conspiratorial – Tey are Necessary’ © Michaela Collard 2019, with permission from Red Pepper; ‘Is the Labour Party against empirical sociology? Some Notes on Power, Elites and Anti-Racism’ © David Miller and Tom Mills 2019, with permission of Ceasefre; ‘Jews, Antisemitism and the Law’, © Naomi Wayne, 2019; ‘Tere is Another Way to Resolve Labour’s Toxic Wrangles Around Complaints’ © David Rosenberg 2019, with permission from Morning Star; ‘Stereotypes Should Be Discussed Not Sanctioned’, © Jamie Stern-Weiner and Alan Maddison 2019, frst appeared on Verso Blog; Te authors of the testimonies all retain their copyright. Contents Acknowledgements Editor’s Introduction Overview 1 Corbyn Under Fire Daniel Finn 2 Te Never-Ending Story Daniel Finn Evidence 3 Smoke Without Fire: Te Myth of a ‘Labour Antisemitism Crisis’ Jamie Stern-Weiner and Alan Maddison 4 Te Chimera of British Anti-Semitism (And How Not to Fight It If It Were Real) Norman G. Finkelstein 5 Sixty Times Jeremy Corbyn Stood with Jewish People @ToryFibs 6 Briefng for Canvassers: Challenging False Accusations of Antisemitism Jewish Voice for Labour Reporting 7 Labour, Antisemitism, and the News: A Disinformation Paradigm Justin Schlosberg and Laura Laker 8 Te Fake News Nazi: Corbyn, Williamson, and the Antisemitism Scandal David Edwards vi Contents 9 Is the Guardian Institutionally Antisemitic? Jamie Stern-Weiner Case Study: The 2017 Labour Party Conference 10 Labour Party Conference or Nuremberg Rally? Assessing the Evidence Jamie Stern-Weiner Case Study: The IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism 11 Hue and Cry over the UCU Richard Kuper 12 Why the Labour Party Should Not Adopt the IHRA Defnition or Any Other Defnition of Antisemitism Norman G. Finkelstein Case Study: Liverpool Riverside CLP 13 Te Riverside Scandal: Louise Ellman and the War on Riverside Labour Party Jewish Voice for Labour Politics 14 When Jews Are Just Fodder for the Tory Propaganda Machine Antony Lerman 15 Antisemitism, Cosmopolitanism and the Politics of Labour’s ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Right-Wings Jeremy Gilbert 16 Critiques of Elite Power Aren’t Antisemitic or Conspiratorial – Tey Are Necessary Michaela Collord 17 Is the Labour Party Against Empirical Sociology? Notes on Power, Elites, and Anti-Racism Tom Mills and David Miller Processes and Principles 18 Jews, Antisemitism, and the Law Naomi Wayne Contents vii 19 Tere Is Another Way to Resolve Labour’s Toxic Wrangles Around Complaints David Rosenberg 20 Stereotypes Should Be Discussed Not Sanctioned Jamie Stern-Weiner and Alan Maddison Testimonies: Labour Jews Speak Out Rica Bird Andrew Feinstein J.G. Sam Glat Murray Glickman Mike Howard Stephen Kapos Agnes Kory Frank Land Bernice Laschinger Rachel Lever Moshe Mankof Angie Mindel Elizabeth Morley Sonia Routledge Mike Scot Jenny Secretan Roger Silverman Annabelle Sreberny Ruth Steigman Daniel Vulliamy About the Contributors Acknowledgements Te editor wishes to thank Norman G. Finkelstein, Célestine Fünf- geld, Leo Hollis, Alan Maddison, and Deborah Maccoby for their assistance in the preparation of this book and/or the development of the ideas that informed it. Special thanks, also, to those Jewish members of the Labour Party who gave permission to reproduce their testimonies. Introduction We are approaching the 2019 general election in bizarre circumstances. From the climate crisis to homelessness, Brexit to the NHS, the stakes could scarcely be higher. Yet a story about the Labour Party that has no basis in fact, is prima facie absurd, and whose partisan motivations are transparent is playing a signifcant role in our national conversa- tion and might even infuence the result. Tis story has dragged out for fully four years. Time and again, criticisms appear to have been answered, positions clarifed, and measures implemented – only for the same allegations to not just resurface in, but return to dominate political discussion. Like a creature from a horror flm, the ‘Labour antisemitism’ controversy just won’t die. Te ‘antisemitism’ campaign is, in its profle and its protractedness, unprecedented in modern British political history. To fnd an anal- ogy requires reaching back to those outbursts of collective madness which periodically stain the annals of human history and astonish all succeeding generations. If its consequences do not compare with those of the Salem Witch Trials or the McCarthyite purges, still, in its combination of cynical calculation, botomless irrationality, and self-perpetuating moral hysteria, the propaganda ofensive against Labour lies squarely in the trajectory of these infamous episodes. It is a curious experience to write about the ‘antisemitism’ allega- tions against Labour, because there is barely anything of substance to xii Introduction engage with. A miniscule proportion of the party’s half-million mem- bers were found to have posted ofensive remarks on social media; so far as can be told, the entire furore reduces to this. Were it not for the Civil Rights Movement, African Americans would have continued to sufer the rigid segregation, harsh discrimination, and routine brutal- ity of the Jim Crow South. Were it not for the ‘Labour antisemitism’ campaign, a small number of questionable Facebook posts would have received less publicity. Indeed, this book might fairly have been titled, A Comprehensive and Exhaustive Examination of Nothing. If Jeremy Corbyn’s historic candidacy is defeated, it is likely that the ‘antisemitism’ charge will briefy take on renewed salience as fac- tional opponents seek to engineer his ouster. If and when he is ejected, the whole issue will vanish overnight, consigned forever to Orwell’s memory hole. What happens if Corbyn wins is less certain.1 But his opponents will continue to have resort to the ‘antisemitism’ weapon, while there are already indications that the relentless smears have curtailed his radicalism.2 In any case, the ‘Labour antisemitism’ campaign set a template that is sure to be deployed against other popular movements of the lef – as supporters of Bernie Sanders are beginning to discover.3 It is therefore critical that the strange events that have warped British politics since 2015 are soberly examined and the truth about them established – not just for posterity, but to help kindred movements avoid repetition of Labour’s mistakes. Tis volume brings together a selection of analytical writings4 on the ‘Labour antisemitism’ afair as a contribution to this efort. Jamie Stern-Weiner 21 November 2019 Overview 1 Corbyn Under Fire Daniel Finn Jacobin, 9 April 2018 Te dominant narrative in the British media about Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour Party, and antisemitism is false and defamatory. Labour does not have a leadership that tolerates or encourages prejudice against Jews. It is not a safe haven for bigots. Tere is no evidence that antisemitic views are more prevalent in Labour than in other parties, or in British society as a whole.1 Anyone making those elementary points is likely to face an indig- nant response. Hasn’t Corbyn himself admited that Labour has a problem?2 How can you deny the evidence staring you in the face? Te question ‘does Labour have a problem with antisemitism?’ has been posed incessantly to Labour politicians and to ordinary party members. It should be seen for what it is: a rhetorical trap with a built-in conclusion. If they answer ‘no’, they will be ridiculed for suggesting that Labour is entirely free of antisemitic prejudice. If the party has even a single member with antisemitic views, that’s a problem. Only a fool would claim that Labour has managed to eliminate every last trace of big- otry from its ranks. But if they answer ‘yes’, that will be taken as an admission that the prevailing narrative is correct. Take, for example, Corbyn’s recent interview with Jewish News.3 Afer speaking at length about his opposition to antisemitism and 4 anti-semitism and the labour party the steps that would be taken to root it out, he was urged to ‘call on your supporters to stop calling allegations of antisemitism smears’. For some, any talk of ‘smears’ is itself a form of antisemitism and should be sanctioned by the party.
Recommended publications
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte

    'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte

    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
  • From Chicken Soup to Denial and Beyond: Fifty Years of Arnold

    From Chicken Soup to Denial and Beyond: Fifty Years of Arnold

    1 From Chicken Soup to Denial and Beyond: Fifty Years of Arnold Wesker. Kelly McCloy, B.A. (Hons), MRes. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Ulster University. January 2021 I can confirm that the word count of the thesis is less than 100,000 words 2 Contents Acknowledgements 4 Abstract 5 Introduction 7 Chapter One: Food (i) Wesker’s depiction of food in the Anglo-Jewish domestic space. 33 (ii) Pigs and Capitalism in The Kitchen. 47 (iii) Wesker’s Roots and the Battle between Potatoes and Victoria Sponge Cake. 51 (iv) The Search for Strawberries and Dreams in I’m Talking About Jerusalem. 61 (v) The King’s Daughters: Wesker and an Anti-Tale made for Foodies. 68 (vi) “She promised herself many things…to stop drinking, to cut out chocolates…” Wesker and eating alone. 70 (vii) “Pools:” Mrs Hyams the Jewish Everywoman. 78 Conclusion to Chapter One. 82 Chapter Two: Women (i) “Centre of power:” Wesker’s early women. 85 (ii) “Preserving the mask of a busy, uncommunicative housewife:” Wesker’s invisible women in Chicken Soup with Barley and Love Letters on Blue Paper. 96 (iii) “Daughters of Eve:” Wesker’s Women from the 1980s-2000s. 125 (iv) “O, these men, these men!” Love against all odds in Lady Othello. 139 (v) “I have no distorted, rosy image of them.” Wesker as an authentic writer of women. 162 Conclusion to Chapter Two 180 Chapter Three: Denial (i) Supposedly “false accusations of child abuse:” Denial. 183 (ii) “There has to be a reason:” A Torn Family Portrait.
  • Newspeak in the 21St Century by David Edwards and David Cromwell London, UK: Pluto Press, 2009

    Newspeak in the 21St Century by David Edwards and David Cromwell London, UK: Pluto Press, 2009

    © 2010, Global Media Journal -- Canadian Edition Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 119-121 ISSN: 1918-5901 (English) -- ISSN: 1918-591X (Français) Newspeak in the 21st Century By David Edwards and David Cromwell London, UK: Pluto Press, 2009. 304 pp. ISBN: 9780745328935. A Book Review by Clyde Sanger Carleton University, Canada This book is a hatchet job. Granted, it is detailed and precise and no doubt accurate, and the authors who co-founded the London-based Media Lens website in 2001 are completely open about the main aim of both the website and this book. It is to highlight “examples of bias, omission or deception in British mainstream media” with a particular focus on media thought to be objective (the BBC) or left-wing (The Guardian, The Observer, and The Independent). They build on the work of Noam Chomsky’s Propaganda Model and borrow their title from George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), in which Winston Smith’s research job in the Ministry of Truth was to falsify records and to embrace an ideological language (Newspeak) that sanitizes any heretical thoughts. So they do not hide their hatchets, which positively gleam, as they chop away at mainly well-intentioned but duped broadcasters and reporters. It is their second swing at this target. Earlier they published (also with Pluto Press) Guardians of Power: The myth of liberal media. You know what you are getting. They do not tell us about their own backgrounds, but the Internet is helpful as ever. Both born in 1962, Edwards has a degree in politics from Leicester, and got interested in human rights and the environment after years of doing sales in a marketing corporation, while Cromwell is a physicist and oceanographer from Glasgow who had four years with Shell in the Netherlands.
  • Antisemitism in the Radical Left and the British Labour Party, by Dave Rich

    Antisemitism in the Radical Left and the British Labour Party, by Dave Rich

    Kantor Center Position Papers Editor: Mikael Shainkman January 2018 ANTISEMITISM IN THE RADICAL LEFT AND THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY Dave Rich* Executive Summary Antisemitism has become a national political issue and a headline story in Britain for the first time in decades because of ongoing problems in the Labour Party. Labour used to enjoy widespread Jewish support but increasing left wing hostility towards Israel and Zionism, and a failure to understand and properly oppose contemporary antisemitism, has placed increasing distance between the party and the UK Jewish community. This has emerged under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, a product of the radical 1960s New Left that sees Israel as an apartheid state created by colonialism, but it has been building on the fringes of the left for decades. Since Corbyn became party leader, numerous examples of antisemitic remarks made by Labour members, activists and elected officials have come to light. These remarks range from opposition to Israel’s existence or claims that Zionism collaborated with Nazism, to conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds or ISIS. The party has tried to tackle the problem of antisemitism through procedural means and generic declarations opposing antisemitism, but it appears incapable of addressing the political culture that produces this antisemitism: possibly because this radical political culture, borne of anti-war protests and allied to Islamist movements, is precisely where Jeremy Corbyn and his closest associates find their political home. A Crisis of Antisemitism Since early 2016, antisemitism has become a national political issue in Britain for the first time in decades. This hasn’t come about because of a surge in support for the far right, or jihadist terrorism against Jews.

  • Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections

    Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections David Hirsh Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK The Working Papers Series is intended to initiate discussion, debate and discourse on a wide variety of issues as it pertains to the analysis of antisemitism, and to further the study of this subject matter. Please feel free to submit papers to the ISGAP working paper series. Contact the ISGAP Coordinator or the Editor of the Working Paper Series, Charles Asher Small. Working Paper Hirsh 2007 ISSN: 1940-610X © Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy ISGAP 165 East 56th Street, Second floor New York, NY 10022 United States Office Telephone: 212-230-1840 www.isgap.org ABSTRACT This paper aims to disentangle the difficult relationship between anti-Zionism and antisemitism. On one side, antisemitism appears as a pressing contemporary problem, intimately connected to an intensification of hostility to Israel. Opposing accounts downplay the fact of antisemitism and tend to treat the charge as an instrumental attempt to de-legitimize criticism of Israel. I address the central relationship both conceptually and through a number of empirical case studies which lie in the disputed territory between criticism and demonization. The paper focuses on current debates in the British public sphere and in particular on the campaign to boycott Israeli academia. Sociologically the paper seeks to develop a cosmopolitan framework to confront the methodological nationalism of both Zionism and anti-Zionism. It does not assume that exaggerated hostility to Israel is caused by underlying antisemitism but it explores the possibility that antisemitism may be an effect even of some antiracist forms of anti- Zionism.
  • Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations

    Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations

    The University of Manchester Research Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102063 Document Version Accepted author manuscript Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Barclay, A., Sobolewska, M., & Ford, R. (2019). Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations. Electoral Studies, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102063 Published in: Electoral Studies Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:09. Oct. 2021 Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations. Andrew Barclay School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Prof. Maria Sobolewska School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Prof. Robert Ford School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Manuscript accepted for publication by Electoral Studies How to cite: Barclay, Andrew. Sobolewska, Maria. & Ford, Robert (2019) “Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations” Electoral Studies, 61 1 Political realignment of British Jews: testing competing explanations.
  • Islamophobia Monitoring Month: December 2020

    Islamophobia Monitoring Month: December 2020

    ORGANIZATION OF ISLAMIC COOPERATION Political Affairs Department Islamophobia Observatory Islamophobia Monitoring Month: December 2020 OIC Islamophobia Observatory Issue: December 2020 Islamophobia Status (DEC 20) Manifestation Positive Developments 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Asia Australia Europe International North America Organizations Manifestations Per Type/Continent (DEC 20) 9 8 7 Count of Discrimination 6 Count of Verbal & Physical Assault 5 Count of Hate Speech Count of Online Hate 4 Count of Hijab Incidents 3 Count of Mosque Incidents 2 Count of Policy Related 1 0 Asia Australia Europe North America 1 MANIFESTATION (DEC 20) Count of Discrimination 20% Count of Policy Related 44% Count of Verbal & Physical Assault 10% Count of Hate Speech 3% Count of Online Hate Count of Mosque Count of Hijab 7% Incidents Incidents 13% 3% Count of Positive Development on Count of Positive POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT Inter-Faiths Development on (DEC 20) 6% Hijab 3% Count of Public Policy 27% Count of Counter- balances on Far- Rights 27% Count of Police Arrests 10% Count of Positive Count of Court Views on Islam Decisions and Trials 10% 17% 2 MANIFESTATIONS OF ISLAMOPHOBIA NORTH AMERICA IsP140001-USA: New FBI Hate Crimes Report Spurs U.S. Muslims, Jews to Press for NO HATE Act Passage — On November 16, the USA’s Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), released its annual report on hate crime statistics for 2019. According to the Muslim-Jewish Advisory Council (MJAC), the report grossly underestimated the number of hate crimes, as participation by local law enforcement agencies in the FBI's hate crime data collection system was not mandatory.
  • Delegates Report 2017

    Delegates Report 2017

    DELEGATES’ REPORT Annual Conference 2017 From the Conference Arrangements Committee FSC LOGO A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR OF THE CONFERENCE ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE On behalf of the Conference Arrangements Committee (CAC), I am delighted to welcome you as a delegate to the 2017 Annual Conference at the Brighton Centre. It will be an important week as we consider the impact of the snap General Election. In addition to the main Conference, Women’s Conference will take place on the Saturday and for the first time will have a formal voice in Labour’s policy making process. CLPs and affiliated organisations have been invited to send delegates who will be able to vote on the policy areas that should be debated at Conference. The Youth Annual Gathering will also be taking place on Sunday as well as The Fringe - hundreds of organisations hosting a range of events including seminars, debates, workshops and receptions in the Brighton Centre and at other venues across the city. This Delegates’ Report outlines the business to be discussed and voted on at Conference together with a provisional timetable and details of the ballots taking place at Conference. The CAC will issue a daily report at Conference with a detailed agenda of the day’s debates, ballot arrangements and results, the text of composite motions and other information to supplement the reports of the National Executive Committee and National Policy Forum which will be sent to you before Conference. The CAC reports will be handed to you as you enter the Conference Hall and are also available from the Party Stand and the CAC Office.
  • Antisemitic Anti-Zionism: the Root of Labour's Crisis. a Submission To

    Antisemitic Anti-Zionism: the Root of Labour's Crisis. a Submission To

    Antisemitic anti-Zionism: the root of Labour’s crisis A submission to the Labour Party inquiry into antisemitism and other forms of racism Professor Alan Johnson June 2016 Antisemitic anti-Zionism: the root of Labour’s Palestine, pro-Israel, pro-peace crisis 4.4 A final word Professor Alan Johnson is Senior Research Fellow at the Britain Israel Communications and Introduction Research Centre (BICOM), founder and editor of Fathom: for a deeper understanding of Israel Everything depends on the Labour Party and the region, and a registered Labour Party understanding what it is dealing with: almost supporter (Unite). never old-fashioned Jew hatred, almost always modern antisemitic anti-Zionism – a programme to abolish Israel, a movement to boycott Israel CONTENTS and discourse to demonise Israel. To combat it, the party needs to understand the historical roots, Introduction ideological tributaries, contemporary modes and forms of expressions of antisemitic anti-Zionism. Part 1: Ideological Tributaries 1.1 Rethinking our values: assimilationism, * universalism, the Jews and the Left 1.2 Ideological Tributary: Communism and ‘anti- Antisemitism is the most protean of hatreds and Cosmopolitanism’ it has shape-shifted again (Gidley 2011). Labour 1.3 Ideological Tributary: The New Left and ‘anti- does not have a neo-Nazi problem. It does, Zionism’ however, have a problem with a modern anti- 1.4 Ideological Tributary: Islam, Islamism and Zionism of a particularly excessive, obsessive, and antisemitism demonising kind, which has co-mingled with an older set of classical antisemitic tropes, images Part 2: Modes and assumptions to create antisemitic anti- 2.1 The Programme to abolish Israel Zionism (Wistrich 1984, 1991, 2004, 2009, 2012; 2.2 The Discourse to demonise Israel Johnson 2015a, 2016).
  • INDABA 77/13 1 E D I T O R I a L

    INDABA 77/13 1 E D I T O R I a L

    Das SADOCC-Magazin für das Südliche Afrika 77/13 W A F F E N H A N D E L Südafrikas Sündenfall W I R T S C H A F T Facharbeiter gesucht K O N Z E P T K U N S T Angolas Kiluanji Kia Henda Offenlegung: INDABA wird herausge- geben vom Dokumen ta tions- und Kooperationszentrum Südliches Afrika SADOCC (SADOCC) in Wien (ZVR-Zahl 973735397) und bezweckt die Infor- Das Dokumentations- und Kooperationszentrum Süd- mation und Diskussion über Entwick liches Afrika in Wien setzt sich für eine solidarische -lungen im Südlichen Afrika. Dem Außen-, Wirtschafts- und Entwicklungspolitik gegenüber Vereinsvorstand gehören an: Mag. den Ländern des Südlichen Afrika ein. Bernhard Bouzek, HK Lydia Dyk, Dr. Astrid Esterlus, Johann Gatt ringer, SADOCC: Dr. Ingeborg Grau, MSc Ulrike Dokumentation und Bibliothek in Go melsky, Mag. Robert Konrad, A-1040 Wien, Favoritenstraße 38/18/1 Adalbert Krims, Univ. Prof. Dr. Walter (Öffnungszeiten: Dienstag 14.00-18.00) Sauer, Abg. z. Ltg. Godwin Schuster, Dr. Tel. 01/505 44 84 Gabriele Slezak. Fax 01/505 44 84-7 URL: http://www.sadocc.at das quartalsweise erscheinende Magazin INDABA monatliche Veranstaltungen „Forum Südliches Afrika“ Stadtspaziergänge „Afrikanisches Wien“ Projekt Schwimmunterricht in KwaZulu/Natal Interessierte Einzelpersonen und Institutionen können SADOCC durch ihren Beitritt als unterstützende Mitglieder fördern. In der Mitgliedsgebühr von jährlich EUR 22,– (für Institutionen EUR 40,–) sind sämtliche Aussendungen und Einladungen enthalten. Das Abonnement von INDABA kostet EUR 13,–. Elfriede Pekny-Gesellschaft derung von Abo- oder Mitgliedsbeitrags-Einzahlungen auf unser Die Elfriede Pekny-Gesellschaeichft zu (benanntr För nach der Konto bei der BA-CA, BLZ 12000, Konto 610 512 006; n African Studies in Österr etärin) ist Spenden erbeten auf Konto: Postsparkasse, BLZ 60000, Souther - Kto-Nr.
  • Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003

    Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003

    Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003 Based on information by the National Focal Points of the RAXEN Information Network Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 – 2003 Based on information by the National Focal Points of the EUMC - RAXEN Information Network EUMC - Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003 2 EUMC – Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 – 2003 Foreword Following concerns from many quarters over what seemed to be a serious increase in acts of antisemitism in some parts of Europe, especially in March/April 2002, the EUMC asked the 15 National Focal Points of its Racism and Xenophobia Network (RAXEN) to direct a special focus on antisemitism in its data collection activities. This comprehensive report is one of the outcomes of that initiative. It represents the first time in the EU that data on antisemitism has been collected systematically, using common guidelines for each Member State. The national reports delivered by the RAXEN network provide an overview of incidents of antisemitism, the political, academic and media reactions to it, information from public opinion polls and attitude surveys, and examples of good practice to combat antisemitism, from information available in the years 2002 – 2003. On receipt of these national reports, the EUMC then asked an independent scholar, Dr Alexander Pollak, to make an evaluation of the quality and availability of this data on antisemitism in each country, and identify problem areas and gaps. The country-by-country information provided by the 15 National Focal Points, and the analysis by Dr Pollak, form Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 of this report respectively.
  • East End Immigrants and the Battle for Housing Sarah Glynn 2004

    East End Immigrants and the Battle for Housing Sarah Glynn 2004

    East End Immigrants and the Battle for Housing Sarah Glynn 2004 East End Immigrants and the Battle for Housing: a comparative study of political mobilisation in the Jewish and Bengali communities The final version of this paper was published in the Journal of Historical Geography 31 pp 528­ 545 (2005) Abstract Twice in the recent history of the East End of London, the fight for decent housing has become part of a bigger political battle. These two very different struggles are representative of two important periods in radical politics – the class politics, tempered by popular­frontism that operated in the 1930s, and the new social movement politics of the seventies. In the rent strikes of the 1930s the ultimate goal was Communism. Although the local Party was disproportionately Jewish, Communist theory required an outward looking orientation that embraced the whole of the working class. In the squatting movement of the 1970s political organisers attempted to steer the Bengalis onto the path of Black Radicalism, championing separate organisation and turning the community inwards. An examination of the implementation and consequences of these different movements can help us to understand the possibilities and problems for the transformation of grass­roots activism into a broader political force, and the processes of political mobilisation of ethnic minority groups. Key Words Tower Hamlets, political mobilisation, oral history, Bengalis, Jews, housing In London’s East End, housing crises are endemic. The fight for adequate and decent housing is fundamental, but for most of those taking part its goals do not extend beyond the satisfaction of housing needs.