DOCSLIB.ORG

Hinkley Point Public Consultation Statement January 2009 …

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hinkley Point Public Consultation Statement January 2009 … January 2009 Public Consultation Statement EDF: Plans for New Nuclear Development at Hinkley Point © PPS (Local & Regional) Limited 2009 This document is protected by copyright in the UK and in other countries. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced in any form without the prior consent of PPS (Local & Regional) Limited. PPS (Local & Regional) Limited fully reserves all its legal rights and remedies in respect of any infringement of its copyright. Contents 1. Foreword from EDF..............................................................................................1 2. Introduction ..........................................................................................................3 i Context of the Consultation.........................................................................3 3. Importance of Public Consultation ....................................................................5 i The Planning Process for New Nuclear Power Stations ........................5 ii Central Government Guidance...................................................................5 iii West Somerset Council’s Statement of Community Involvement....................................................................................................6 iv Sedgemoor District Council’s Statement of Community Involvement....................................................................................................8 v EDF’s Commitment ................................................................................... 10 4. Methodology.......................................................................................................11 i Purpose of Consultation........................................................................... 11 ii Geographic Coverage............................................................................... 12 iii PPS’s Seven-Point Plan........................................................................... 13 iv Co-ordination with British Energy’s Plans .............................................. 13 5. Consultation Programme ..................................................................................15 i Timetable ................................................................................................... 15 ii Public Consultation Stakeholder Management..................................... 15 iii Project Website .......................................................................................... 16 iv Freephone and Freepost .......................................................................... 16 v Newsletters ................................................................................................. 16 vi Media ................................................................................................... 18 vii Public Exhibitions....................................................................................... 18 viii British Energy Public Meetings................................................................ 20 ix Stakeholder Workshops............................................................................ 20 x Stakeholder Meetings ............................................................................... 22 6. Results of Public Consultation.........................................................................23 i Project Website .......................................................................................... 23 ii Questionnaires ........................................................................................... 23 iii Comments/Enquiry Forms........................................................................ 28 iv Stakeholder Workshops............................................................................ 29 7. Response to Public Consultation ....................................................................31 8. Conclusion..........................................................................................................48 Appendix 1 – Key Stakeholders..............................................................................50 Appendix 2 – Sample Media Coverage ..................................................................51 Appendix 3 – Questionnaire and Enquiry Form ...................................................53 Appendix 4 – Workshop Reports............................................................................58 Appendix 5 – Stakeholder Meeting Reports..........................................................75 1. Foreword from EDF EDF acquired land adjacent to the existing power stations at Hinkley Point because it sees the site as a suitable location for the development of a new generation of nuclear power stations to help provide Britain with a future stable source of low carbon electricity. EDF’s original intention was to pursue plans for a single new European Pressurised Water Reactor (EPR) on it site at Hinkley Point. However, the site was purchased prior to its acquisition of British Energy, which completed on 5th January 2009. Adjacent to the land acquired by EDF is the Hinkley Point ‘C’ site, recently proposed by British Energy as a possible site for a new nuclear power station. EDF’s intention, following the acquisition of British Energy, is to build two new EPRs at Hinkley Point on the combined sites if the appropriate consents are received. EDF already had an extensive customer base and employed around 2,000 people in the South West of England prior to the takeover of British Energy. However, as a newcomer to Hinkley Point, the Company was keen to understand the key issues and concerns that the local community has about the possible provision of new nuclear power at Hinkley Point. EDF retained PPS, who specialise in organising and managing community consultation on major development proposals, to handle initial public consultation on its plans for Hinkley Point. The PPS team, based in Bristol, managed the public consultation and have produced this report. The consultation was undertaken during the last quarter of 2008 when EDF and British Energy were separate companies and EDF was proposing a single new power station on its land. PPS’s report deals comprehensively with the methodology and programme of consultation undertaken, the views expressed by the general public and key community stakeholders, and EDF’s preliminary response to the issues that have emerged. EDF sees this as the first stage of a process of ongoing community engagement throughout the planning and development process. A good start has been made in developing a positive and productive relationship with the local community and key local stakeholders but much work still remains to be done. 1 The integration with British Energy makes it even more important for EDF to build on the relationships developed over the last three months and ensure that the local community is fully engaged with, and regularly consulted on, its plans for new nuclear build at Hinkley Point as these evolve in the coming months and years. Richard Mayson External Affairs Director, EDF Development Company 2 2. Introduction i Context of the Consultation PPS South West, which specialises in community consultation on major planning proposals, was appointed by EDF Development Company Ltd (EDF) to undertake a programme of public consultation. The consultation programme was designed to support both the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) scoping consultation and the Strategic Siting Assessment (SSA) nomination process for development of a new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point, Somerset. The consultation programme was discussed with officers of West Somerset and Sedgemoor District Councils at a meeting on 17th September 2008 where the broad principles of the developer’s proposed public consultation strategy and programme were agreed. As the principal local planning authorities that may be required to consider future proposals for new nuclear provision at Hinkley Point, EDF was keen to ensure that the two Councils were happy that the nature and scope of the consultation was appropriate for this stage in the planning process. At the September meeting, both Councils made the point that EDF should endeavour to co-ordinate its consultation activities with those of British Energy, which was also planning a new nuclear power station on land it owns at Hinkley Point. The Councils were concerned that two entirely separate public consultation exercises, on broadly the same subject, could lead to public confusion. The EDF team agreed to speak to British Energy to try to co-ordinate consultation events and ensure that a consistent message was delivered to the general public. Subsequent to this meeting, in September 2008, EDF made a formal offer to acquire British Energy. During the period in which this consultation was carried out, this deal was still subject to shareholder and regulatory approval. At the time of implementation of the consultation programme, EDF and British Energy remained separate and competing companies. The consultation undertaken was therefore an EDF branded programme, separate from though co-ordinated with, the consultation undertaken by British Energy over the same period. This Public Consultation Statement provides: relevant background on current national and local policy and advice on developer-led public consultation; the methodology and approach of the consultation programme; the results of the public consultation and EDF’s response to the main issues raised during the consultation. 3 The objectives of the consultation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South West Ports Association
    Chairman: Capt. Brian Murphy (Poole) Vice-Chairman: Capt. Duncan Paul (Falmouth) Hon. Secretary: Capt. Adam Parnell (Tor Bay) Hon. Treasurer Capt. Tim Charlesworth (Cattewater) Accounts/Web site: Ms. Sandra Lynch (Cattewater) www.swrpa.org.uk SOUTH WEST REGIONAL PORTS ASSOCIATION A Directory of Ports and Harbours in the South West Region September 2019 South West Regional Ports Association Directory July 2019 The AIMS of the SOUTH WEST REGIONAL PORTS ASSOCIATION ➢ To provide a forum for ports and harbours within the South West Region to come together for regular discussions on topics affecting ports in the region. ➢ To provide self-help advice and expertise to members. ➢ To provide members with representation at all levels on all topics affecting port and harbour operations. ➢ To co-ordinate attention on issues including environment, leisure and tourism, road and rail links, contingency plans and future development of the South West. ➢ To support and encourage the British Ports Association. ➢ To improve trade using South West ports, particularly within the E.C. ➢ To establish link between ports in the region and the many leisure sure bodies including R.Y.A. Cruising Club, R.N.S.A. diving, fishing, power boating, rowing, 'et skiing and other organisations using harbours. ➢ To provide to the media and others, information and statistics on the ports industry. ➢ To support other bodies and organisations in ensuring the South West receives the necessary support and encouragement from Government and the E.C. ➢ To improve operations and co-operations between South West port members and Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, County Fire Brigades, H.M. Customs and H.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management Review Figure 4 Wider Area
    305000 310000 315000 320000 325000 330000 335000 340000 345000 350000 355000 360000 Note: The limits, including the height and depths of the Works, shown in this drawing are not to be taken as limiting the obligations of the contractor under Contract. Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. 0 0 Bridgwater Bay / Bristol Channel / Severn Estuary © Crown copyright and database rights 2014. 0 5 Ordnance Survey Licence number 100026380 6 1 · Severn Estuary European Marine Site (Severn Estuary/Môr Brean Down Site of Special Scientific Hafren Special Area of Conservation [SAC], Severn Estuary Legend: Interest [SSSI] Special Protection Area [SPA], Severn Estuary RAMSAR Site) Relevant Main · Bridgwater Bay Site of Special Scientific Interest [SSSI] and Watercourses National Nature Reserve [NNR] · High tidal range Somerset Levels and 0 0 · High sediment load 0 Moors (Adjacent to 0 6 · Navigation 1 River Parrett, River · Fishing Weston - super - Mare Sewage Treatment Works (Wessex Water) Tone and King's ST 300 467 Sedgemoor Drain) Boundaries Indicative possible Bridgwater Bay Lagoon location. River Parrett estuary - part of the Statutory 0 Bridgwater Bay 0 Port of Bridgwater, dredged channel 0 5 lagoon 5 1 provides navigation to Bridgwater Hinkley Point power stations intake / outfall M5 Motorway Highbridge and Burnham-on-Sea · Recreational boating A38 0 0 0 0 5 Railway 1 Refer to insert plan Figure 5 Hinkley Point power stations 0 0 Steart Marshes coastal 0 5 4 1 realignment scheme Huntspill River outlet Combwich · Combwich
    [Show full text]
  • UKHO Releases Enhanced Chart Coverage of Bridgwater Bay
    Press Release 28 February 2019 UKHO releases enhanced chart coverage of Bridgwater Bay UK Hydrographic Office produces upgraded chart to support developments in Somerset The Taunton-headquartered UK Hydrographic Office (UKHO) has released a new chart providing enhanced coverage of Bridgwater Bay and the River Parrett. The upgraded chart is available as both an Electronic Navigational Chart (ENC) and in paper format, helping mariners to plan and execute safe and efficient voyages, supporting wider infrastructure development in the area as well as benefiting the local economy. The chart covers the approach to the River Parrett across Bridgwater Bay and south-eastwards to the river berths of Combwich and Dunball. Supporting and enabling safe passage at sea is at the core of what the UKHO does, and the upgraded chart is essential for safe operational use of the Hinkley Point C Harbour to transport construction materials and equipment for the immense construction project. The UKHO worked closely with the Harbour Masters at Hinkley Point C Harbour and Port of Bridgwater to define the new chart limits and scale, along with ensuring that appropriate hydrographic surveys and details of the new developments were available to produce the chart. Chris Berkley, Master Mariner and Product Manager at UKHO, commented: “We are pleased to be able to release new and improved scale electronic and paper charts which give ships access to more detailed, highly accurate information that can support safe passage. To be able to support infrastructure development close to our headquarters and provide mariners with the tools they need to navigate Bridgwater Bay with confidence is a great example of how the local economy can benefit from our expertise.” ---------------------- ENDS Notes to Editors About the UK Hydrographic Office The UK Hydrographic Office is a leading centre for hydrography, providing marine geospatial data to inform maritime decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridgwater St John's Conservation Area Appraisal & Management Plan
    Bridgwater St John’s Conservation Area Appraisal & Management Plan Adopted 18th December 2019 Sedgemoor District Council Inward Investment & Growth [email protected] Bridgwater St John's Conservation Area Appraisal & Management Plan Sedgemoor District Council 2019 Contents Introduction 2 Purpose of the Character Appraisal & Management Plan 4 Planning Policy Context 5 Part 1: Character Appraisal 7 Introduction 7 Assessment of Special Interest: A Summary 7 Location & Setting 9 Historic Development & Archaeology 10 Building Condition Survey 19 Definition of Character Areas 23 Character Analysis: Southern section of Church Street 28 Character Analysis: Northern section of Church Street 31 Character Analysis: Blake Place 35 Spatial Analysis: The Contribution of Soft and Hard Landscaping 41 Key Views & Vistas 43 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats 45 Boundary Review 46 Part 2: Management Plan 61 Introduction 61 Regeneration Context 61 General Design Principles 67 The Management Proposals & Action Plan 69 Future Monitoring & Review 105 List of Figures 108 List of Images 109 References 112 Appendix 1 Building Condition Survey 114 Appendix 2 The Action Plan 120 Appendix 3 Design Brief for St John's House and gap site to the North 124 Appendix 4 Proposed Elevations for nos. 7 to 13 (odd) Monmouth Street 128 2 Sedgemoor District Council 2019 Bridgwater St John's Conservation Area Appraisal & Management Plan Introduction 1.1 Conservation Areas are ‘…areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance’. These areas are designated under Section 69 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and every Local Planning Authority has a duty, from time to time, to determine which parts of their area should be designated.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 19.0 Navigation and Marine Transport
    Chapter 19.0 Navigation and Marine Transport www.tidallagoonswanseabay.comwww.tidallagooncardiff.com Tidal Lagoon Cardiff Ltd 19.0 Navigation and Marine Transport 19.1 Overview of existing situation 19.1.1 Overview of Commercial Shipping Activity 19.1.1.1 The Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary is an important shipping area with large ships from national and international destinations using the estuary's ports and anchorages. The wider study area (as defined by the extent of Figure 19.1) is home to a number of significant commercial ports, in particular Bristol (Avonmouth and Royal Portbury Dock), Cardiff, Newport and Barry, with circa 8 smaller ports including Bristol City Docks and Bridgwater. Collectively these ports are an important part of the regional and national economy; in 2013 they handled around 15.5 million tonnes of cargo. This represents approximately 4% of the UK total (DfT, 2014). 19.1.1.2 Commercial vessels enter the Severn Estuary from the south-west via the deep water approaches in the Bristol Channel. Those bound for Cardiff navigate to the northwest of Flat Holm whilst those transiting to Newport, Bristol or locations up- estuary of the Severn Bridge crossings take the deep water channel between Flat Holm and Steep Holm (Figure 19.2). Vessels bound for Newport usually transit north of Flat Holm and south of Monkstone, then transit towards the Newport Channel. Vessels bound for Bristol and Sharpness navigate through the Bristol Deep and King Road channels, with vessels continuing to Sharpness on the tidal River Severn (STP, 2010). 19.1.1.3 Port access is tidally restricted, with water levels at Bristol, Newport, Cardiff and Barry controlled by lock gates.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Boating in the Severn Estuary
    Dinghy Racing, Clevedon Bay © Clevedon Sailing Club Recreational Boating in the Severn Estuary Association of Severn Estuary Relevant Authorities (ASERA) This report provides an overview of what is known by ASERA about recreational boating in the Severn Estuary, including its key potential environmental impacts, existing management measures and recommended Good Practice Guidance. November 2016 0 Table of Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Aims ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Severn Estuary European Marine Site ............................................................................................. 10 3.2 Severn Estuary Management Scheme ............................................................................................. 13 Method/Approach ................................................................................................................................... 17 Severn Estuary Recreational Boating .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 14. Navigation
    14. Navigation 14.1 Introduction 14.1.1 The Environment Agency, in partnership with Sedgemoor District Council, are delivering the Bridgwater Tidal Barrier (BTB) Scheme to reduce tidal flood risk to Bridgwater and surrounding areas. 14.1.2 This chapter considers the potential impacts of the BTB Scheme on the right of navigation in the River Parrett and thus the navigation receptors (commercial and recreational users). It provides an assessment of the navigation impacts resulting from the construction and operation of the BTB Scheme. It assesses potential significant impacts identified through the scoping and subsequent detailed assessment processes and where necessary, proposes mitigation measures to avoid, reduce or minimise the significance of these effects. The assessment of likely significant effects on the upstream fish and eel passage sites is provided in Chapter 18 (Upstream fish and eel passage). 14.1.3 The following appendices have been prepared in support of this chapter: . Appendix 14A – Bridgwater Tidal Barrier Navigation Risk Assessment . Appendix 14B – Bridgwater Tidal Barrier Gate Width Assessment Technical Note . Appendix 14C – Bridgwater Tidal Barrier Temporary Bypass Channel 14.1.4 This chapter is supported by the following figure: . Figure 14.1 – Navigation Features and Proposed Scheme Sheets 1 and 2 14.2 Legislation and policy 14.2.1 The following legislation and policy has been considered in developing the scheme design. The lower reaches of the River Parrett are tidal and a right of navigation exists at common law, meaning the public have the right of passage in boats. The Transport and Works Act 1992 (TWA) enables orders to be made authorising the construction and operation of works interfering with rights of navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Bridgwater Port Operations Manual Revision 9 February 2021
    Port of Bridgwater PORT OPERATIONS MANUAL Revision 9 – February 2021 Prepared by: Capt. K Badsey Sedgemoor District Council Bridgwater House King Square Bridgwater Somerset TA6 3AR Tel: 44 (0)300 303 7799 email: [email protected] Website www.sedgemoor.gov.uk/portofbridgwater REVISION RECORD Received & inserted Date Remove Pages Insert Pages into plan by: Original - - - Oct 2006 November 2007 Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Update May - Various Details - 2008 Updated 9, 11, 14, 20, 22, 9, 11, 14, 20, 22, July 2009 26, 28,30, 37, 26, 28,30, 37, 47, 47, 55, 57 55, 57 August 2014 Plan reviewed and re-issued as Revision 6 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 August 2015 K.Badsey 2014 2015 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 August 2016 K.Badsey 2015 2016 August 2016 (Amend 1 to 1, 6, 8 1, 6, 8 K.Badsey 2014 Plan) Sept 2017 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 K.Badsey 2016 2017 July 2018 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 K.Badsey 2017 2018 Sept 2019 Plan reviewed and re-issued as Revision 7 Aug 2020 (Amend 1 to v,1,3,8 v,1,3,8 K.Badsey 2019 Plan) August 2020 Plan updated to meet accessibility requirements February 2021 Plan updated regarding Max vessel dimensions Combwich (Page 7) Contents: Page Part 1 - Introduction 1.1 Statutory Harbour Authority 1 1.2 Competent Harbour Authority 1 1.3 Duty Holder 1 1.4 Designated Person 1 1.5 Policies 1.5.1 General Policies 2 1.5.2 Marine Safety Policy 2 Part 2 – Management of the Port 2.1 Local Legislation and general description 2.1.1 Geography 3 2.1.2 Local Acts 3 2.1.3 Port Limits 4 2.1.4 Tides and Tidal Ranges 5 2.1.5 Anchorages 5 2.1.6
    [Show full text]
  • 25Marine Activities
    25 Marine Activities 25 MARINE ACTIVITIES 25.1 Introduction 25.1.1 This chapter of the Environmental Appraisal provides a description of the marine activities occurring within the Bristol Channel that could potentially be affected by the construction and operation of the proposed Hinkley Point C (HPC) Project. Consideration is given to: maritime transport and vessel traffic; and extent and use of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) Lilstock Firing Range. 25.1.2 The focus of the work with respect to maritime transport is an assessment of the risk of potential collision during the construction and operation of HPC. The assessment focuses on the risk of potential collision with the temporary jetty (herein referred to as the ‘jetty’) and the cooling water outfall and intake structures extending into the Bristol Channel. This chapter does not consider potential impacts relating to commercial fisheries. The assessment of potential impacts on commercial fisheries is dealt with in the chapter on marine ecology (Chapter 19). 25.2 Methodology 25.2.1 The assessment of the risk of potential collision has been informed by a Collision Risk Assessment which is currently being undertaken by Anatec (UK) Limited to identify the range of ships that could have a potential impact on the cooling water structures; identify potential hazards and scenarios; and calculate the probability of collision. To inform this risk assessment, a review of baseline data on the existing maritime activity in the vicinity of HPC has been undertaken using the following sources of information: the ShipRoutes UK database administered by Anatec UK Ltd; an Automated Identification System (AIS) database for the area; a satellite vessel monitoring system; sightings data; data from the Royal Yachting Association (RYA) and the Cruising Association; and key stakeholder consultation (including local ports and harbours, and the Royal Navy).
    [Show full text]
  • Domesday Holder (1086), Died Hard
    ancient OBriDgtoater ant) t&e iRitoei parrett. BY THE REV. W. H. P. GRESWELL, M.A., F.R.G.S. THE legend that Bridgwater was so called from " Pons aquae " instead of " Pons Walteri " de Douai, the Domesday holder (1086), died hard. In Queen Elizabeth's time John of Bridgwater, alias Stone, a Jesuit exile and once canon of Wells is called " Johannes Aqua Pontanus." Even to-day many probably think that the old town is so called from a former bridge over the water of the Parrett. Where was the " Brugie " or " bridge " of Domesday, and how was " it constructed ? In Saxon charters there was the trinoda necessitas " of a Pons, Arx and Expeditio. Probably the first " Pons " was of wood and of two or more spans with one of them as a drawbridge, all founded on " a hard," over which at low water the waters of the Parrett flowed in shallow fashion, just as to-day they flow over " the hard " of Conib- wich (Cynwith or Cynuit) Passage, across which, within recent memory, waggons were driven, connecting the old road from Bristol with Cannington and the " Herepath," westward, over the Quantocks. 1 2 In a Cottonian MS., temp. Henry VIII, there is a sketch of Bridgwater and the mouth of the river Parrett (see accom- panying illustration), showing a three-spanned bridge (not an arch), and also such interesting details as Bridgwater spire ; two cannon guarding the mouth of the Parrett ; a shorter " " approach of the river from Stolford ; the Botestall itself 1. See Greswell's " Land of Quantock " (1903), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridgwater Town Council Blake Museum the RIVER BRIDGES OF
    wooden centerings which had supported the masonry outcry, and is now Grade II* listed. The side-shifting as it was being built. There was an outcry at the span was cut up, and the engine partly destroyed. restriction of barge traffic on the Parrett, which caused Fortunately part of the engine frame survives in situ , some fatal accidents to bargees so it was replaced in while the boiler and one of the cylinders were rescued 1843 by a timber bridge, the work being done with no and donated to Westonzoyland Museum. restriction to traffic. The bridge was designed by Francis Fox (1818-1914) (not Sir Francis Fox, a different engineer) for the Bristol and Exeter Railway. The main span was 127-feet (39 m, and the approach section was 80-feet (24 m) long. It was manually operated for the first eight months, and Bridgwater Town Council The timber Somerset Bridge 1843-1904 then powered by a steam engine. The bridge was taken Blake Museum over from the Bristol and Exeter Railway by the Great The present iron girder bridge was erected in Western Railway in 1876. The contract for the masonry THE RIVER BRIDGES OF 1904.There is a footbridge running alongside it. was let in 1869, and the bridge opened in 1871.The BRIDGWATER masonry was built by Warburton Brothers Ltd. of Bristol and the ironwork by Lloyds, Foster and Co. of Wednesbury. The present Somerset Bridge The Black Bridge Also known as the Telescopic Bridge. It could be withdrawn into a recess after another section of the The Stone Bridge: engraving after John Chubb The Black Bridge as a footbridge bridge was moved sideways to allow the section which The building of the stone bridge over the River Parrett spanned the River Parrett to be drawn back.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Bridgwater – Marine Risk Assessments – September 2020
    Port of Bridgwater – Marine Risk Assessments – September 2020. Contents: Page Introduction ………………………………………. 1 Defining Hazards and Risk ………………………………………. 2 Hazards, Risks and Control measures 1) Seaward Approach ………………………………………. 3 2) Narrow channel with sharp bends ………………………………………. 4 3) Shallow tidal river, dries at LW ………………………………………. 5 4) Strong tidal streams ………………………………………. 6 5) Shifting river bed ………………………………………. 7 6) Wind and Weather ………………………………………. 8 7) Drying berths ………………………………………. 9 8) Berthing and unberthing Dunball ………………………………………. 10 9) Berthing and unberthing Combwich ………………………………………. 11 10) Passing other vessels in the River ………………………………………. 12 11) Fire ………………………………………. 13 12) North Sea barges to Combwich ………………………………………. 14 Introduction The Port Marine Safety Code requires all harbour authorities to ensure that all risks are formally assessed and are as low as reasonably practicable in accordance with good practice. This document records the review of assessments conducted in September 2020. The assessments were undertaken in accordance with the PMSC which states: - Functions to which the Code applies 1.4. The Code is concerned with harbour authority responsibilities for port marine safety but does not purport to cover all the duties and responsibilities of harbour authorities, or even all their safety responsibilities. The Code does not, for example, relate to duties and responsibilities deriving from health and safety legislation, and (with some exceptions) those relating to the safety of vessels under the Merchant Shipping Acts. However, it has been designed so that compliance with the good practice guidance in the Code should be fully compatible with compliance with harbour authorities’ other duties and responsibilities. Use formal risk assessment 3.5 The risks associated with marine operations need to be assessed and a means of controlling them needs to be deployed.
    [Show full text]