DOCSLIB.ORG

12288502 02.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
12288502 02.Pdf A-1-1 A-1-2 A-1-3 A-1-4 A-1-5 A-1-6 A-1-7 A-1-8 A-1-9 A-1-10 A-1-11 A-1-12 A-1-13 A-1-14 A-1-15 A-1-16 A-1-17 A-1-18 A-1-19 A-1-20 A-1-21 A-1-22 A-1-23 A-1-24 A-1-25 A-1-26 A-1-27 A-1-28 A-1-29 A-1-30 A-1-31 A-1-32 A-1-33 A-1-34 A-1-35 A-1-36 A-1-37 A-1-38 A-1-39 A-1-40 A-1-41 A-1-42 A-1-43 A-1-44 A-1-45 A-1-46 A-1-47 A-1-48 A-1-49 A-1-50 A-1-51 A-1-52 A-1-53 A-1-54 A-1-55 A-1-56 A-1-57 A-1-58 A-1-59 A-1-60 A-1-61 A-2. Final Report for Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) FOR UP-DATING THE NATIONAL POWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN (PSMP), 2012 FINAL REPORT Ministry of Energy and Minerals 754/33 Samora Avenue P.O. Box 2000 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Tel: + 255 22 2117156 Email: [email protected] December 2016 A-2-1 The SEA Core Team (i). Hussein Sosovele – SEA Team Leader (ii). Raphael Mwalyosi - Ecologist (iii). George Sangu – Plant Ecologist (iv). Alexander Chambi – Land Use (v). Anselem Silayo – Resource Assessment (vi). Florian Silangwa - Socio-Economist (v). Edwinus Lyaya – Cultural Heritage A-2-2 Table of Contents Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ ix 1. Background on Tanzania and current PSMP 2012 .......................................................................... 1 1.1 The Land and the People ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Climate ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Land Cover, Land Use and Resource ........................................................................................ 6 1.4 The Economy and Development............................................................................................ 21 1.5 Energy Development in Tanzania .......................................................................................... 24 1.5.1 Energy generation, distribution and transmission and status in the current PSMP ....... 25 1.6 The Power System Master Plan – Salient Features ............................................................... 30 1.7 Projected energy demand as proposed in the revised PSMP, 2012 ...................................... 32 1.8 Environmental Issues in the PSMP 2012. .............................................................................. 33 2. SEA for updating the PSMP-2012 .................................................................................................. 36 2.1 Objectives of an SEA .............................................................................................................. 36 2.2 Objectives of this SEA ............................................................................................................ 36 2.3 Defining the level /tier at which the SEA will take place ....................................................... 39 2.4 The SEA boundaries ............................................................................................................... 39 3. Legal, Institutional and Administrative Framework for this SEA .................................................. 41 3.1 Policy framework ................................................................................................................... 41 3.2 Legal framework .................................................................................................................... 46 3.2.1 International Conventions and Standards............................................................................. 55 3.3 Administrative arrangement for the implementation of this SEA ......................................... 57 4. Selection of Regions and Sites for this SEA ................................................................................... 59 4.1 Brief Background of the Regions ........................................................................................... 59 4.1.1 Morogoro Region .......................................................................................................... 59 4.1.2 Mtwara Region .............................................................................................................. 59 A-2-3 4.1.3 Ruvuma Region............................................................................................................. 60 4.1.4 The Kidatu Hydro Power Plant ..................................................................................... 60 4.1.5 Mtwara – Mnazi Bay Gas ............................................................................................. 63 4.1.6 Ruvuma – Ngaka Coal Project ...................................................................................... 65 5. Approaches and Methodology for this SEA ...................................................................................... 67 5.1 Overview of methodology and approaches .......................................................................... 67 5.2 Requirements for Stakeholder’s Consultation ...................................................................... 67 5.2.1 JICA Requirements ....................................................................................................... 67 5.2.2 World Bank Requirements ............................................................................................ 68 5.2.3 Tanzania Requirements ................................................................................................. 68 5.3 Stakeholder Identification ..................................................................................................... 69 5.4 List of Stakeholders ................................................................................................................ 69 5.5 Stakeholder’s Engagement .................................................................................................... 71 5.6 Methodologies for stakeholder’s participation ..................................................................... 71 5.7 Key Stakeholders Consulted during SEA process ................................................................... 72 5.8 Consultation outcomes and issues noted .............................................................................. 73 5.9 Summary of stakeholders issues are: .................................................................................... 80 6. Consideration of Proposed Energy Scenarios ................................................................................... 82 6.1 Consideration for Renewable energy for PSMP .................................................................... 82 6.2 Considered Scenarios .................................................................................................................. 85 6.2.1 Scenario 1 ............................................................................................................................. 85 6.2.2 Scenario 2 ............................................................................................................................. 86 6.2.3 Scenario 3 ............................................................................................................................. 87 6.2.4 Scenario 4 ............................................................................................................................. 88 6.2.5 Scenario 5 ............................................................................................................................. 89 6.2.6 The proposed scenario 2 ...................................................................................................... 89 6.3. Transmission Issues ............................................................................................................... 90 7. Analysis of Environmental and Social Implications of Scenario 2 ................................................. 91 A-2-4 7.1 Comparison of five power development scenarios: ................................................................... 91 7.2 Environmental and Social Implications .................................................................................. 92 7.2.1 Environmental and Natural Resources Issues ............................................................... 92 7.2.2. Social Issues ................................................................................................................ 100 7.2.3 Health issues ...................................................................................................................... 102 7.2.4 Archaeological and cultural issues ..................................................................................... 104 7.3 Recommended Scenario based on SEA Analysis from the environmental perspective ........... 105 8. Cross Cutting Issues .................................................................................................................... 106 8.1 Institutional Issues ............................................................................................................... 106 8.2 Economic and Financial Issues ............................................................................................. 107 8.3 Technology and Sustainability Issues .................................................................................. 107 8.4 Follow-up:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park
    Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Incorporating a Socio-Economic Monitoring Plan for 29 Villages North and East of the Udzungwa Mountains National Park Paul Harrison November 2006 WORLD WIDE FUND FOR NATURE TANZANIA PROGRAMME OFFICE (WWF-TPO) WITH SUPPORT FROM WWF NORWAY AND NORAD Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Report compiled by Paul Harrison, Kilimanyika Produced on behalf of WWF Tanzania Programme Office, P. O. Box 63117, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Co-Financed by NORAD and WWF Norway All photographs © Kilimanyika, unless otherwise stated. A series of photographs accompanying this report may be obtained by contacting Kilimanyika The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of WWF Tanzania, WWF Norway or NORAD. Bankipore House High Street Brill, Bucks HP18 9ST, UK Tel. +44 7739 803 704 Email: [email protected] Web: www.kilimanyika.com 2 Paul Harrison/Kilimanyika for WWF Tanzania Table of Contents Tables and Figures..............................................................................................................................................4 Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................................................5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Paper 272 Occasional Paper
    POWER AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN TANZANIA: PROSPECTS FOR THE AFDB’s HIGH FIVES STRATEGY CYRIL PRINSLOO & TALITHA BERTELSMANN-SCOTT OCCASIONAL PAPER 272 OCCASIONAL PAPER NOVEMBER 2017 SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA) has a long and proud record as South Africa’s premier research institute on international issues. It is an independent, non-government think tank whose key strategic objectives are to make effective input into public policy, and to encourage wider and more informed debate on international affairs, with particular emphasis on African issues and concerns. It is both a centre for research excellence and a home for stimulating public engagement. SAIIA’s occasional papers present topical, incisive analyses, offering a variety of perspectives on key policy issues in Africa and beyond. Core public policy research themes covered by SAIIA include good governance and democracy; economic policymaking; international security and peace; and new global challenges such as food security, global governance reform and the environment. Please consult our website www.saiia.org.za for further information about SAIIA’s work. ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY PROGRAMME SAIIA’s Economic Diplomacy (EDIP) Programme focuses on the position of Africa in the global economy, primarily at regional, but also at continental and multilateral levels. Trade and investment policies are critical for addressing the development challenges of Africa and achieving sustainable economic growth for the region. EDIP’s work is broadly divided into three streams. (1) Research on global economic governance in order to understand the broader impact on the region and identifying options for Africa in its participation in the international financial system.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Development AED2018.Pdf
    INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN TANZANIA PROF JOSEPH MSAMBICHAKA MBEYA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 50TH YEARS ERB ANNIVERSARY 5TH TO 7TH SEPTEMBER 2018 PRESENTATION LAYOUT 1. DEFINITION OF INFRASTRUCTURE 2. SOME MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN AFRICA IN THE 21ST CENTURY 3. SOME INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN TANZANIA 4. INFRASTRUCTURE GROWTH IN TANZANIA 5. CONTRIBUTION 6. FINANCING 7. CONCLUDING REMARKS INFRASTRUCTURE DEFINITION Infrastructure are the fundamental facilities and systems which include organizational structures, services and physical structures (e.g. buildings, roads, power supplies) serving a country, city, or a place necessary for its economy to function, economic develop and prosperity. INFRASTRUCTURE … CONT’D CLASSIFICATIONS: Hard Infrastructure Infrastructure Soft Infrastructure HARD STRUCTURE Hard Infrastructure Include:- Roads, Bridges, Railways, Buildings, Bridges, Irrigation Structures and Water supply systems. SOFT STRUCTURE Soft Infrastructure Services and system e.g. Educational, Health, Legal, Courier, Financial, Security, Political Systems, Management Systems, Governance, Regulations, Standards, Policies, Procedures, Guidelines etc. INFRASTRUCTURE … CONT’D OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS INCLUDE : • SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE: PARKS, CHILDREN PLAYGROUNDS, HOSPITALS, SPORTS AREA, ETC. • ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE: DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND MARKETS, ETC. • MILITARY INFRASTRUCTURE: BARRACKS, AIRFIELDS, ETC. • COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE: POLITICAL NETWORKS, SOCIAL NETWORKS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,
    [Show full text]
  • U.N. in Action U.N. in Action
    U.N. IN ACTION Week of 21 August 2006 Programme No. 1023 Length: 3’34” DROUGHT AFFECTS POWER GENERATION IN TANZANIA VIDEO AUDIO NARRATION DAR-ES-SALAAM STREET Dar-es-Salaam, capital of the East African nation SCENES of Tanzania, home to more than two and a half million people, has been paralyzed by chronic power cuts over the last few months. (10.5”) POLICE DIRECTING TRAFFIC The power rationing is affecting all aspects of life /SHOPS WITH NO LIGHTS in the city. No traffic lights, many shops and restaurants closed down or operated with reduced capacity. Zul Jamal owns a small business. (14”) JAMAL: (In English) JAMAL ON-CAMERA “What I understand is this, that it’s because of the drought or because there is no enough water to supply the electricity.” (8”) POWER LINES NARRATION Tanzania gets more than 75% of the 500 megawatts it needs to keep the country running from two hydroelectric plants. But drought in the last few years has left the water level in both - 2 - dams at the lowest ever. (14.5”) KIDATU DAM/PLANT NARRATION Here in Kidatu dam, the water level fell from 17 meters to seven. The state of the art hydroelectric plant of four turbines now runs only one with limited capacity. And without immediate significant rainfall, the plant can’t provide more power says its manager Lewanga Tesha. (21”) TESHA ON-CAMERA TESHA: (In English) “As it has been observed today, we are running only one unit this morning. It’s because of water shortage.” (10”) MORE SHOTS OF THE PLANT NARRATION Kidatu power plant usually supplies the national grid with 200 megawatts or about 40% of the country’s needs.
    [Show full text]
  • United Republic of Tanzania
    United Republic of Tanzania POWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 2012 UPDATE Produced by: Ministry of Energy and Minerals May 2013 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AfDB African Development Bank BoT Bank of Tanzania CCM Chama Cha Mapinduzi COSS Cost of Service Study DSM Demand-side Management EAPMP East Africa Power Master Plan EEPCo Ethiopia Electric Power Company EPC Engineering, Procurement and Construction Contract ERT Energizing Rural Transformation ESKOM Electricity Supply Company (RSA) EWURA Energy and Water Utilities Regulatory Authority FYDP Five Years Development Plan GoT Government of the United Republic of Tanzania GWh Gigawatt-hours = 1,000,000,000 watt-hours GWh Gigawatt-hours = 1,000,000,000 watt-hours IDC Interest During Construction IPP Independent Power Producer IPTL Independent Power Tanzania Limited KPLC Kenya Power and Lighting Company kWh Kilowatt-hours = 1,000 watt-hours LTPP Long Term Plan Perspective MCA-T Millennium Challenge Account Tanzania MEM Ministry of Energy and Minerals MKUKUTA Mkakati wa Kukuza Uchumi na Kupunguza Umasikini Tanzania MKUZA Mkakati wa Kukuza Uchumi Zanzibar MoF Ministry of Finance MPEE Ministry of Planning, Economy and Empowerment MPIP Medium-Term Public Investment Plan MVA Mega Volt Ampere MVAr Mega Volt Ampere Reactive MW Megawatt = 1000,000 watts MWh Megawatt-hours = 1,000,000 watt-hours NBS National Bureau of Statistics NDC National Development Corporation NGO Non-Governmental Organisations POPC President‘s Office Planning Commission PPA Power Purchase Agreement i PPP Public Private Partnership PSMP Power System Master Plan R&D Research and Development REA Rural Energy Agency REB Rural Energy Board REF Rural Energy Fund SADC Southern African Development Community SAPP South African Power Pool SEZ Special Economic Zone SME Small and Medium Enterprises SNC SNC-Lavalin International Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Root Causes of the Loss of Biodiversity in the Ruaha Catchment Area
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC ROOT CAUSES OF THE LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY IN THE RUAHA CATCHMENT AREA By H. Sosovele & J.J. Ngwale With contributions from C. Malima and D. Mvella Report submitted to WWF- Tanzania March 2002 i TABLE OF CONTENT Page Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………… .iv Acknowledgement………...…………………………………………………………. v 1. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective of the Root Causes Analysis............................................................... 1 2.0 BASELINE CONDITION …………………………………………….2 2.1 Socio-Economic Characteristics of the RCA............................................................ 2 2.1.1 Population Changes ........................................................................................... 2 2.1.2 Economic Activities........................................................................................... 3 2.1.2.1 Agriculture .................................................................................................. 3 2.1.2.2 Livestock keeping ....................................................................................... 3 2.1.2.3 Mining......................................................................................................... 3 2.1.2.4 Timber/Logging .......................................................................................... 4 2.1.2.5 Plantations..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 24 August 2005 Conflict of Water Use Between Hydropower and Irrigation
    24 August 2005 Conflict of water use between hydropower and irrigation in Tanzania: the conundrum of sectoral policy approaches to water resources development Makarius V. Mdemu1 and Machibya D. Magayane2 1Center for Development Research (ZEFc), Water Flex Str. 3, 53113, Bonn, Germany. Tel: +49 (0) 228-736124, Emails: [email protected] or [email protected] 2ITECO Consult (T) Limited, P.O.BOX 67371 or 23152, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Emails: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract More than 80% of the Tanzania’s population is employed by agriculture, largely more than 95% being on smallholder scales. Currently out of 1 million ha of irrigable land, only 25% of the area is under irrigation, fully or supplemental. On the other hand about 69% of the electrical energy in the national grid is hydropower. Two large power sytems, Mtera-Kidatu in Rufiji basin and Nyumba ya Mungu-Hale-New Pangani Falls (NYM-H-NPF) in Pangani basin are located downstream the irrigation schemes. In the past 14 years there have been uprising conflicts over water between irrigation in upstream and hydropower in the downstream with heavy accusation for over-abstraction of water by smallholders to meet irrigation expansion. Contemporarily, Tanzania views irrigated agriculture as one of the most important strategies for attaining food security and poverty reduction as elaborated in country’s poverty reduction strategy paper (PRSP). Indeed the challenge is attaining such a poverty reduction strategy in a non harmonized sectoral water related development that eventually feed into the PRSP. This paper critically discusses the problems of water use as a result of policy oriented sectoral development approaches with reference to hydropower and agriculture sectors in the Rufiji and Pangani basins in Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Impacts of Climate Change on Water
    I.J. Mathematical Sciences and Computing, 2020, 3, 22-32 Published Online June 2020 in MECS (http://www.mecs-press.net) DOI: 10.5815/ijmsc.2020.03.03 Available online at http://www.mecs-press.net/ijmsc Modelling the Impacts of Climate Change on Water Level Fluctuations in Water Resources in Tanzania: A Case Study of Mtera Dam Filimon Abel Mgandua, Mashaka Mkandawileb, Mohamed Rashidb a College of Business Education, P. O. Box 2077, Dodoma, Tanzania. bUniversity of Dar es salaam, P. O. Box 35091, Dar es salaam, Tanzania. Received: 15 April 2020; Accepted: 03 May 2020; Published: 08 Junel 2020 Abstract This study presents the modelling of impacts of climate change on water resources. Mtera dam in Tanzania was taken as a case study. Data for climate variables on four stations were obtained from Tanzania Meteorological Agency (TMA) while data for water level were obtained from Rufiji Basin Development Authority (RUBADA). The study aimed at doing regression analysis on all stations to analyze the impacts of change in climate variables on water level. Results show that rainfall was significant predictor of water level at Iringa and Dodoma while temperature and sunshine were significant at Mbeya station. Change in climate variables accounted for 37% of the fluctuations of water level in the dam. It was recommended that TANESCO should construct small dams on upper side of Mtera dam to harvest rain water during rainy season. In long run TANESCO should invest into alternative sources of energy. Index Terms: Climate change, Water level, Mtera dam, Regression Analysis. © 2020 Published by MECS Publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study, Rufiji River Basin Janbert Kiwia
    River Resources towards Sustainable Examensarbete i Hållbar Utveckling 158 Development of Tanzania. A Contribution of Hydropower to the Energy Security in Tanzania: Case Study, Rufiji River Basin River Resources towards Sustainable Development of Tanzania. Janbert Kiwia A Contribution of Hydropower to the Energy Security in Tanzania: Case Study, Rufiji River Basin Janbert Kiwia Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences Master Thesis E, in Sustainable Development, 30 credits Printed at Department of Earth Sciences, Master’s Thesis Geotryckeriet, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 2013. E, 30 credits Examensarbete i Hållbar Utveckling 158 River Resources towards Sustainable Development of Tanzania. A Contribution of Hydropower to the Energy Security in Tanzania: Case Study, Rufiji River Basin Janbert Kiwia Supervisor: Ashok Swain Evaluator: Eva Friman Content Chapter 1................................................................................................................1 Introduction..............................................................................................................1 Research hypothesis……………………………………………………….............2 Research question………………………………………………………….............2 Main Objective of the Project ..................................................................................3 Specific objectives…………………………………………………………............3 Scope of the study………………………………………………………….............3 Energy picture in Tanzania………………………………………………...............4 The Case……………………………………………………………………….......5 Limitation
    [Show full text]
  • A Compendium of Energy Sources for Tanzania
    IDRC-MR176e A COMPENDIUM OF ENERGY SOURCES FOR TANZANIA M.J. Mwandosya and M.L. Luhanga Department of Electrical Engineering University of Dar es Salaam Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Material contained in this report is reproduced as submitted and has not been subjected to peer review or rigorous editing by IDRC Communications Division staff. Unless otherwise stated, copyright for material in this report is held by the authors. Mention of a proprietary name does not constitute endorsement of the product and is given only for information. About the Authors Dr. M. J. Mwandosya is a Professor of Control Systems and Power Electronics in the department of Electrical Engineering of the University of Dar es Salaam. He is currently on secondment to the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania as Commissioner for Energy and Petroleum Affairs in the Ministry of Energy and Minerals. Dr. M.L.P. Luhanga is with Department of Electrical Engineering of the University of Dar es Salaam as an Associate Professor of Control Systems and Telecommunications. Both authors have published widely on energy and engineering systems. Authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the support of: The international Development Research Centre, 250 Albert Street, P.O. Box 8500, Ottawa CANADA KIG 3H9 The Research and Publications Committee, University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 35091, Dar es Salaam TANZANIA The Ministry of Energy and Minerals, P.O. Box 2000, Dar es Salaam TANZANIA PREFACE It is a pleasure to be asked to preface this annotated bibliography on energy in Tanzania. I trust that it will be a useful aid for rese~r~hers, development workers, policymakers and all those who are concerned ~with the growth and prosperity of Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 4050-TA STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized TANZANIA FOURTHPOWER PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized June 29, 1983 -~~~~~~Z Public Disclosure Authorized Energy Division Eastern Africa Regional Office This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS 1 Tanzania Shilling (TSh) = US$0.082 US$1 = TSh 12.2 1 TSh = 100 T cents WEIGHTS AND MEASURES I liter = 1.057 quarts 1 meter (m) = 3.28 feet 1 kilometer (km) = 0.621 miles 1 square kilometer (km2) = 0.386 square miles 1 kilovolt (kV) = 1,000 volts 1 kilowatt (kW) = 1,000 watts 1 megawatt (MW) = 1,000 kilowatts 1 megawatt hour (MWh) = 1,000 kilowatt hours 1 megavolt ampere (MVA) = 1,000 kilovolt ampere (kVA) 1 gigawatt hour (GWh) = 1 million kilowatt hours 1 kilo calorie (kcal) = 3.97 British thermal units (Btu) 1 ton of coal equivalent (tce) = 7,000,000 kilocalories 1 ton of oil equivalent (toe) = 10,500,000 kilocalories (kcal) ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS Acres = Acres International Limited AATP = Arusha Appropriate Technology Project BADEA = Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa CIDA = Canadian International Development Agency EAPL = East African Power and Lighting Company Limited KfW = Kreditanstalt fur Wiederaufbau MWE = Ministry of Water and Energy NORAD = Norwegian Agency for Development OPEC = Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries RUBADA = Rufiji Basin Development Authority SIDA = Swedish International Development Authority SIDO = Small Industries Development Organization SWECO = Swedish Consulting Group TANESCO = Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited TARECO = Tanzania Rural Electrification Corporation TTI = Technical Training Institute TANESCO's Financial Year (FY) Calendar This report was prepared by Messrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence Mbuya Tanzania Case Study
    Competing Water Use in the Usangu Catchment: How Can Water Resources Management Facilitate Poverty Reduction Lawrence Mbuya Facilitator, Central Policy Team Figure 2.1: Usangu catchment within the Rufiji Basin N LakLakNy eanz 9800000 Victoria 100 0 100 200 Kilometer s Lake Nat ron Lake Eyasi 9600000 Lake Manyara L a k e TA NZA IA TANZANIA Pem ba 9400000 T Pemba a Zanzib ar n g a Do doma #S Dodoma Un guja n Unguja y i k Da r EsS al am a Mo rog or Ri #S Mor ogoro Dar es Salaam Kisigo ve Mter a Dam #S r # er iv n 9200000 R Kidatu Dam e # b om Nj a Irin ga r e ive R #S ha Iringa ufiji Rive r a Msem be R u R c t a e r G r MMa afi fia L v e O Lake Rukwa Ri er a vi R ah u o R r le itt e L b m o l i K Mb eya 9000000 Mbeya #S n a i r e L iv d R du a a n g n k n a Map legend r a e b I M #S Regional centers N # Dams y a #S Rivers network s Songe a 8800000 Songea a Ruaha National Park Tanzania background SMUWC catchment Rufiji Basin catchment Open water and swamp ref;d\sm uwc2000\cons ul\ Geof K. 28-febr. 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1400000 Figure 1: General reference map #S 9180000 Iringa 9170000 Iri nga 9160000 r RUAHA NATIONAL PARK ive R ha ua at R 9150000 Gre 9140000 K 9130000 i m b i S# Msangaji R vi e r 9120000 r e 9110000 i v S# Madi bira R Ngiriama #S ra e b m e 9100000 East ern Wetl and Nd T Mafing a N USANGU GAM E RESERVE E M p 9090000 Upaga ma m a P w s S# at Rua ha Ri ver efu A Gre Ih S# Ikoga C l d cou rse o S# S i 9080000 Mkoj Nyaluha nga E West ern W et land A K Y i o 9070000 g N Nyolol o a R U vi H e r 9060000 C S#
    [Show full text]