Halfaya from Breaking North- Rommel's Dash to the Wire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Halfaya from Breaking North- Rommel's Dash to the Wire Scientia Militaria, South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 6, Nr 2, 1976. http://scientiamilitaria.journals.ac.za :2 A~TI- T4~K REGI~E~Tf SAA: - -A~K A~[) A~TI- TA~K I~ THE WESTER~ [)ESERTf 1940-1942 (Va•.• 2) Reorganisation on the frontier On the morning of the 28th detachments from 5 Indian Infantry Brigade were already moving On 28 November 1941 Rommel temporarily towards Capuzzo, accompanied by 1 Field abandoned the frontier garrisons to their fate Regiment RA and C Battery of 2 A/Tk Regi- and turned westwards to return to the To- ment SAA. bruk-Sidi Rezegh area. Freyberg's New Zea- At Menastir the enemy continued to be active landers had made the most of the Panzer Di- and 22 New Zealand Battalion, isolated from vision's absence and had taken Belhamed and the rest of its Brigade and perilously short of ed Duda, recaptured Sidi Rezegh and linked ammunition, felt unable to oppose the isolated with the garrison of Tobruk. The German German armoured formations in that area. On armoured divisions now turned back towards receiving the news from NZ Divisional Cavalry Sidi Rezegh along the Trigh Capuzzo where Regiment that 4 Indian Division Headquarters they were further damaged in encounters were at the Omars the commander of 22 with New Zealand units, but the poor tactical Battalion decided to withdraw there for sup- handling of the British 22 Armoured Brigade plies and fresh orders. After dark on 28 No- allowed Rommel's weakened forces through. vember 22 Battalion headed south with its The German artillery inflicted heavy losses 220 vehicles and halted at Point 201, five again on 7 Armoured Division and battle was once more joined around Sidi Rezegh, where miles north of the Omars, at 0230 hI'S the the British forces on 29 and 30 November next day. Later that morning Messervy, com- were employed with characteristic lack of manding 4 Indian Division, sent orders for co-ordination and were defeated in detail. Lt-Col Andrew of 22 Battalion to assume The unprotected New Zealand Division was command of 5 New Zealand Brigade, establish badly mauled in consequence and Belhamed a new headquarters to replace that captured and Sidi Rezegh changed hands once more; on the 27th and to hold a line from Capuzzo Tobruk was besieged again. through Musaid to Upper Sollum. Ritchie, commanding 8 Army, was under the erro- On the 28th with XIII Corps preoccupied by neous impression that the Afrika Korps was the renewed fighting around Tobruk, respon- being supplied largely from Bardia, and wanted sibility for the frontier area was assumed by the reconstituted 5 New Zealand Brigade, aug- Maj-Genl Messervy, the commander of 4 In- mented by 5 Indian Brigade, to continue dian Division. Having seen off Rommel's to mask that town. In addition to stopping tanks, his forces were now preparing to as- enemy maintenance parties from entering or sault the enemy still holding out in Libyan leaving Bardia the Brigade was to prevent Omar. Other preparations were also afoot the Axis frontier garrisons along the line from to tidy up the confused situation created by Point 207 to Halfaya from breaking north- Rommel's dash to the wire. wards. The departure of the enemy armour from the Messervy was eager to avoid weakening his vicinity of Capuzzo on the 27th and 28th left Division further by incurring heavy casualties 23 and 28 New Zealand Battalions of 5 New however and units engaged in the harrassment Zealand Brigade still in possession of this vital of enemy troops were to avoid fixed positions area. These units were now desperately short until the arrival of the field and medium ar- of food and ammunition however, and suc- tillery made possible a more strenuous pro- cour had been promised by 4 Indian Division. secution of the siege. 5 Indian Brigade would 49- Scientia Militaria, South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 6, Nr 2, 1976. http://scientiamilitaria.journals.ac.za send patrols along the Trigh Capuzzo, and by 1 December 5 Indian Brigade had completed along the west of the frontier wire between its partial relief of 5 New Zealand Brigade Omar Nuovo and Bir Sheferzen. Meanwhile and had occupied the Capuzzo - Musaid - the New Zealanders would turn their full Sollum line while the New Zealanders con- attention to the Via Balbia, and shortly after centrated around the Via Balbia to the north. D Battery 2 A/Tk arrived in Omar Nuovo, its M and 0 Troops were detached to accompany Despite the setbacks around Belhamed and the mobile columns of the New Zealand Di- Sidi Rezegh and the elimination from the battle visional Cavalry. of most of the New Zealand Division, Ritchie remained optimistic about the eventual suc- For the next few days patrols were carried ces of 'Crusader'. He had concluded, rightly, out along the Bardia-Tobruk road, and on 30 that Rommel's forces were nearer exhaustion November 0 Troop found itself in action in than his own, and that the Axis lines of sup- support of the Divisional Cavalry's A Squa- ply and reinforcement were still effectively dron, accounting for four armoured vehicles blocked by Allied air and naval strikes. In and two 3-ton lorries. Ritchie's opinion it was vital for the Allies Ever since the excitement of the 25th, 2 to retain the initiative and give Rommel no A/Tk's A Battery had been operating with respite, and in this view he was emphatically mobile columns of the Central India Horse seconded by Auchinleck. and 6 South African Armoured Car Regiment With Rommel's armour now settling behind in the vicinity of FSD 50 and Bir Sheferzen. anti-tank defences in the Sidi Rezegh area On 28 November the 2-pdrs of A Battery Ritchie proposed to have XIII Corps hold its joined a mobile column of guns and light ar- ground in the Tobruk salient while he launched moured vehicles under Major Newall to sweep XXX Corps to seize EI Adem, a vital commu- the area south of the wire between the Omars nications centre whose capture would be and Halfaya. While engaged on these escort just as damaging to Rommel's position as tasks the anti-tank guns came under fire on another successful assault on Sidi Rezegh. several occasions but always at too great For the EI Adem operation XXX Carps wouid a range to join in the retaliation. Meanwhile use 7 Armoured Division, 22 Guards Brigade, A Battery's 18-pdr troop had been ordered 1 SA Infantry Brigade and 4 Indian Division. into Omar Nuovo, where 7 Indian Brigade From the latter 11 Indian Brigade had already had been told to hold the position at all costs, been moved south of the Omars to form part should Rommel return. Nand P Troops of D of XXX Corps reserve, and the remainder of Battery 2 A/Tk also formed part of the anti- the Division would follow as soon as it could tan k defence. be relieved a:ong the frontier by 2 SA Divi- sion which was earmarked for this more The Omars Secured static role as it was yet insufficiently equipped or trained for mobile operations. It had been decided now to try to take the remainder of the Omar positon and on the By 2 December Rommel realised he had won night of 30/31 November 3/1 Punjab Regi- the local battle around Sidi Rezegh and had ment attacked Libyan Omar from the north, once again prevented the relief of Tobruk. supported by 31 Field Regiment RA and the Central India Horse, and secured a lodgement Rommel Wayla!d in the position after very severe fighting. 4/16 Punjab Regiment was thrown into the battle Intercepted signals indicated that Ritchie was on the next day, and by nightfall on 31 No- unlikely to renew the offensive before the 3rd vember only a force of about a hundred Ger- and Rommel was therefore tempted to assay mans remained unvanquished. This small par- another relief of the frontier garrisons. His ty attempted to escape but were rounded up forces were now in far worse shape than by patrols, and dawn on 1 December the when he had mounted his previous dash to whole of the Omar position was in Allied the wire however, and he decided to try to hands. The severity of the Axis resistance had, disguise this fact by using advance guards however,caused some disturbance to the plans to clear the Gambut area. These advance for relocating 4 Indian Division. Nevertheless, guards were to move off immediately along 50 Scientia Militaria, South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 6, Nr 2, 1976. http://scientiamilitaria.journals.ac.za j '" ,..:. '", IT.":'~'L, ."."., '" 8'" '1"OiCl"l)t ~~~.~.... ., ",,'1,::~~.~.~;.~ :,' . ..p TO \~" _ •• , •••• '. " , ••• ',' •••••• , ... "','. '0', "" ••" __••.•,.,.._ ~ . , "<"'. •• ,-:;.. '" .",','','.' '" .. ' ..;;;-%:':0" ... -~: ~,j •..•;''i''l:''f,,'',.•••'''''''.~ ~.. ""'. ...• C_____."'_. .."""-.,...- _ ; r----~;.,~ " " , .,,~~ ...." ~B • ~ ," ARtfTE ~ • ., ::~.... '" ~: !al'" O~ • A.1." ••u..... -;e_~.... , , .,11 __ '::, ""'" """",,, ",'" --'4..... 00l. •• ~ •• . •••••FIUO~~.~~ 4':, _', . ; "'" ~". ," /, .... ..: : . ._,..-.......".. ... ;, '. "."~'~•.\ \ ,/"'"""",~.~... .....---.....! lor' .•.••' "', ••••, : ., .••......• '., , ...":M,V;.;.~o;."'" ,. ...• •• .".ARMD. """ ":< /.' f ;i "'.WfI_ ',:;.. "', ••••~. , ..j ,/.I ,'. 'l , I S."'Il~(. ~I* "'. :: I ~ ;, '----- •.:~.I~Jn.•-" ". ----...;.;••••••1 \ '.""... ' ••••••~',;. f : .. -- ..."1 " ....." ""..."~ I ., • ,,'" / ,;\ V I, 'T' • vA. •••.•••. ~ ,~' '", '.,•••••• ,~' , . ~, ,~''', , "..0__.'T"- ... ~,.. ': ... _.- • I. , /.", ......•.. ' . •.jfl .-./"',;, •••• ~ , l"I" ,."•.tf ; >..~ \, ....1:2 GU~JiDl 0 ~:~' ' ", -- , "b i y'. , • '1IDE. A •• "'''~Ara • 111 1!. •• " '.. '''0.< .••~ .~__ 'V>.-!."S.,,~ 80(" IIIl1S Uk: ~ .~~ 11 . 1;,-., i '11 H 1Jt/S4 S? " """ tf\ U l1Ilim:"iIDE, • D 'l'Q"'. 4Z' f i the Trigh Capuzzo and Via Balbia. At the cautiously and the German Infantry dismount- same time Rommel ordered General Gambara ed some two miles west of 28 New Zealand to move Ariete and Trieste Divisions to the (Maori) Battalion's positions.
Recommended publications
  • WESTERN DESERT CAMPAIGN Sept-Nov1940 Begin Between the 10Th and 15Th October and to Be Concluded by Th E End of the Month
    CHAPTER 7 WESTERN DESERT CAMPAIG N HEN, during the Anglo-Egyptian treaty negotiations in 1929, M r W Bruce as Prime Minister of Australia emphasised that no treat y would be acceptable to the Commonwealth unless it adequately safeguarded the Suez Canal, he expressed that realisation of the significance of sea communications which informed Australian thoughts on defence . That significance lay in the fact that all oceans are but connected parts o f a world sea on which effective action by allies against a common enem y could only be achieved by a common strategy . It was as a result of a common strategy that in 1940 Australia ' s local naval defence was denude d to reinforce offensive strength at a more vital point, the Suez Canal an d its approaches. l No such common strategy existed between the Germans and the Italians, nor even between the respective dictators and thei r commanders-in-chief . Instead of regarding the sea as one and indivisible , the Italians insisted that the Mediterranean was exclusively an Italia n sphere, a conception which was at first endorsed by Hitler . The shelvin g of the plans for the invasion of England in the autumn of 1940 turne d Hitler' s thoughts to the complete subjugation of Europe as a preliminary to England ' s defeat. He became obsessed with the necessity to attack and conquer Russia . In viewing the Mediterranean in relation to German action he looked mainly to the west, to the entry of Spain into the war and th e capture of Gibraltar as part of the European defence plan .
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of BARDI a U RING the 2Nd January General Mackay
    CHAPTER 8 THE BATTLE OF BARDI A U RING the 2nd January General Mackay visited each of the six attack- D ing battalions . Outwardly he was the most calm among the leaders, yet it was probably only he and the other soldiers in the division who ha d taken part in setpiece attacks in France in the previous war who realise d to the full the mishaps that could befall a night attack on a narrow fron t unless it was carried out with clock-like precision and unfailing dash . The younger leaders were excited, but determined that in their first battle the y should not fail . To one of them it was like "the feeling before an exam" . Afterwards their letters and comments revealed how sharply consciou s many of them were that this was the test of their equality with "the old A.I.F." in which their fathers had served, and which, for them, was the sole founder of Australian military tradition. "Tonight is the night," wrote the diarist of the 16th Brigade . `By this time tomorrow (1700 hrs) the fate of Bardia should be sealed. Everyone is happy, expectant, eager . Old timers say the spirit is the same as in th e last war. Each truck-load was singing as we drove to the assembly point i n the moonlight . All ranks carried a rum issue against the bleak morning . At 1930 hrs we passed the `I' tanks, against the sky-line like a fleet o f battle-cruisers, pennants flying . Infantry moving up all night, rugged , jesting, moon-etched against the darker background of no-man's land .
    [Show full text]
  • Brevity, Skorpion & Battleaxe
    DESERT WAR PART THREE: BREVITY, SKORPION & BATTLEAXE OPERATION BREVITY MAY 15 – 16 1941 Operation Sonnenblume had seen Rommel rapidly drive the distracted and over-stretched British and Commonwealth forces in Cyrenaica back across the Egyptian border. Although the battlefront now lay in the border area, the port city of Tobruk - 100 miles inside Libya - had resisted the Axis advance, and its substantial Australian and British garrison of around 27,000 troops constituted a significant threat to Rommel's lengthy supply chain. He therefore committed his main strength to besieging the city, leaving the front line only thinly held. Conceived by the Commander-in-Chief of the British Middle East Command, General Archibald Wavell, Operation Brevity was a limited Allied offensive conducted in mid-May 1941. Brevity was intended to be a rapid blow against weak Axis front-line forces in the Sollum - Capuzzo - Bardia area of the border between Egypt and Libya. Operation Brevity's main objectives were to gain territory from which to launch a further planned offensive toward the besieged Tobruk, and the depletion of German and Italian forces in the region. With limited battle-ready units to draw on in the wake of Rommel's recent successes, on May 15 Brigadier William Gott, with the 22nd Guards Brigade and elements of the 7th Armoured Division attacked in three columns. The Royal Air Force allocated all available fighters and a small force of bombers to the operation. The strategically important Halfaya Pass was taken against stiff Italian opposition. Reaching the top of the Halfaya Pass, the 22nd Guards Brigade came under heavy fire from an Italian Bersaglieri (Marksmen) infantry company, supported by anti-tank guns, under the command of Colonel Ugo Montemurro.
    [Show full text]
  • (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies A Stepping Stone to Success: Operation Battleaxe (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine Mike Bechthold On 16 February 1943 a meeting was held in Tripoli attended by senior American and British officers to discuss the various lessons learned during the Libyan campaign. The focus of the meeting was a presentation by General Bernard Montgomery. This "gospel according to Montgomery," as it was referred to by Air Chief Marshal Arthur Tedder, set out very clearly Monty's beliefs on how air power should be used to support the army.1 Among the tenets Montgomery articulated was his conviction of the importance of air power: "Any officer who aspires to hold high command in war must understand clearly certain principles regarding the use of air power." Montgomery also believed that flexibility was the greatest asset of air power. This allowed it to be applied as a "battle-winning factor of the first importance." As well, he fully endorsed the air force view of centralized control: "Nothing could be more fatal to successful results than to dissipate the air resource into small packets placed under the control of army formation commanders, with each packet working on its own plan. The soldier must not expect, or wish, to exercise direct command over air striking forces." Montgomery concluded his discussion by stating that it was of prime importance for the army and air 1 Arthur Tedder, With Prejudice: The war memoirs of Marshal of the Royal Air Force, Lord Tedder (London: Cassell, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Something Is Wrong with Our Army…' Command, Leadership & Italian
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies ‘Something is wrong with our army…’ Command, Leadership & Italian Military Failure in the First Libyan Campaign, 1940-41. Dr. Craig Stockings There is no question that the First Libyan Campaign of 1940-41 was an Italian military disaster of the highest order. Within hours of Mussolini’s declaration of war British troops began launching a series of very successful raids by air, sea and land in the North African theatre. Despite such early setbacks a long-anticipated Italian invasion of Egypt began on 13 September 1940. After three days of ponderous and costly advance, elements of the Italian 10th Army halted 95 kilometres into Egyptian territory and dug into a series of fortified camps southwest of the small coastal village of Sidi Barrani. From 9-11 December, these camps were attacked by Western Desert Force (WDF) in the opening stages of Operation Compass – the British counter-offensive against the Italian invasion. Italian troops not killed or captured in the rout that followed began a desperate and disjointed withdrawal back over the Libyan border, with the British in pursuit. The next significant engagement of the campaign was at the port-village Bardia, 30 kilometres inside Libya, in the first week of 1941. There the Australian 6 Division, having recently replaced 4 Indian Division as the infantry component of WDF (now renamed 13 Corps), broke the Italian fortress and its 40,000 defenders with few casualties. The feat was repeated at the port of Tobruk, deeper into Libya, when another 27,000 Italian prisoners were taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Counter-Attack and a Controversial Relief The
    CHAPTER 8 LAST COUNTER-ATTACK AND A CONTROVERSIAL RELIEF HE men of the Tobruk garrison had always thought that the term o f T their confinement would be the time taken to drive off the besiegers . In the midsummer month of July when the prospect of relief by a frontie r offensive seemed indefinitely remote, General Blarney proposed anothe r kind of relief : relief by sea . His request provoked a strong disagreement between the British and Australian Governments ; but confidences were so well kept that to all but one or two of the Australians who were in the fortress the first intimation that their going thence had been th e subject of controversy was the publication after the war of Sir Winston Churchill's The Grand Alliance, in which he gave his own account of the dispute. There he declared that it gave him pain to have to relate the incident, but to suppress it indefinitely would have been impossible . "Besides, " he wrote, "the Australian people have a right to know what happened and why." 1 For that very reason it was unfortunate that, i n relating the differences between the two Governments, Sir Winsto n Churchill quoted extensively from his own messages to successive Aus- tralian Prime Ministers but did not disclose the text of their replies . If the Australian people had depended solely on Sir Winston Churchill 's account for knowledge of what happened and why, they might have been left with some erroneous impressions . In particular it might have been inferred that when Mr Fadden's Government insisted that the relief o f the 9th Division should proceed, it did so not because of a strong convic- tion based on broad considerations advanced by its military advisers bu t because it had been induced by "hard pressure from its political opponents " to turn a deaf ear to Churchill's entreaties .
    [Show full text]
  • Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East
    Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 78: 1–162, 2014 ISSN 1211-376X Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Part 11. On the bat fauna of Libya II Petr BENDA1,2), Friederike SPITZENBERGER3), Vladimír HANÁK2), Michal ANDREAS4), Antonín REITER5), Martin Ševčík2), Jiří Šmíd1) & Marcel UHRIN6) 1) Department of Zoology, National Museum (Natural History), Václavské nám. 68, CZ–115 79 Praha 1, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, CZ–128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic 3) BatLife Österreich c/o Säugetiersammlung Naturhistorisches Museum, Burgring 7, A–1010 Wien, Austria 4) Department of Biology, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanského 62, CZ–500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic 5) South Moravian Museum in Znojmo, Přemyslovců 8, CZ–669 45 Znojmo, Czech Republic 6) Department of Zoology, Institute of Biology and Ecology, P. J. Šafárik University, Moyzesova 11, SK–040 01 Košice, Slovakia Received 6 November 2014; accepted 5 December 2014 Published 22 December 2014 Abstract. A complete list of bat records available from Libya was compiled from literature and from new records, based on field studies and examination of museum specimens. The record review is complemented by distribution maps, summaries of distributional status of the particular species, files of field data, findings on feeding ecology, observations of morphology and variation, and records of arthropod ectoparasites. From the territory of Libya, at least 138 records of 18 bat species belonging to six families are known; viz. Rhinopoma cystops Thomas, 1903 (1 record site), Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (Schreber, 1774) (2), R.
    [Show full text]
  • N M2leco PROPERTY of U.S. ARMY
    Typical Axis Emplacement in the Omars Captured German "Teller" Mines UNCLASSIFIED TY REGRADED - BYAUTHORI ,BYZI- N M2LecO Military Intelligence Service Information Bulletin No. 11 THE BATTLE OF THE OMARS War Department Washington, D.C. UNCLASSIFIED PROPERTY OF U.S. ARMY cRS cl RE Tj~" r Military Intelligence Service Information Bulletin War Department No. 11 Washington, April 15, 1942 MIS 461 NOTICE 1. Information Bulletins, which have replaced Tentative Lessons Bul- letins, have a dual purpose: (1) to provide all officers with reason- ably confirmed information from official and other reliable sources, and (2) to serve as material for lectures to troops. 2. Non-divisional units are being supplied with copies on a basis similar to the approved distribution for divisional commands, as fol- lows: INF DIV CAV DIV ARMD DIV Div Hq 8 Div Hq 4 Div Hq 11 Rcn Troop 1 Ord Co 1 Rcn Bn 1 Sig Co 1 Sig Troop 1 Engr Bn 1 Engr Bn Rcn Sq 1 Med Bn 1 Med Bn .T Figr Sq 1 Maint Bn 1 QM Bn of; led Sq 1 Supply Bn 1 Hq Inf Regt, = :0 Sq 1 Div Train Hq 1 Inf Bn, 1 ea e Cav Brig, 2 ea 4 Armd Regt, 4 ea 8 0-M F , _ Hq Div Arty _t C*v Regt, 4 ea 16 FA Bn, 1 ea 3 FA Bn, 1 ea so==as& HX Div Arty 1 Inf Regt 4 FA Bn, 1 ea 3 32 34 Distribution to air units is being made by the A-2 of Army Air Forces.
    [Show full text]
  • VICTORY at SIDI BARRANI 28 Nov-6 Dec Preparations That Were Being Made Around Them
    CHAPTER 6 VICTORY AT SIDI BARRAN I HE stage was now set for the opening of the desert battle which Genera l T Wavell and his subordinates had discussed before the Italian invasion of Greece. Thus far the new theatre of war had made relatively smal l demands on Wavell's and Longmore's forces, and the Italian Army's failure to overcome the Greeks lowered an already low estimate of it s efficiency . Although Western Desert Force was still greatly outnumbered by General Bergonzoli's army, it had received useful reinforcements . It will be recalled that in October two tank regiments from England ha d joined the 7th Armoured Division, bringing its two armoured brigade s each to their proper strength of three regiments ; and the 7th Royal Tank Regiment had arrived, equipped with heavy "Matilda" tanks to be use d with infantry to break into strong defensive positions . In September the 4th Indian Division had been completed by adding to it the 16th Britis h Brigade ; in November its own third brigade arrived . In the Matruh Fortress was assembled a force equal to two infantry brigades . The 4th Ne w Zealand Brigade, had, since September, been in reserve either at Dab a or Bagush ; and on the edge of the Delta were the 6th Australian Division , now more or less complete, and the Polish brigade . Thus in three month s the forces west of Alexandria had increased from two weak divisions t o three at full strength or close to it, plus four infantry brigades ; and within a few weeks the New Zealand and the 7th Australian Divisions woul d be complete, in units if not equipment, and the 2nd Armoured Divisio n would have arrived.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Battlefields of Libya
    BV Travel - North Africa 4pp 3/6/10 00:29 Page 2 The Forgotten Battlefields of Libya British Veterans Travel offers the opportunity for those who fought in North Africa during WWII, particularly in Libya, to return to their battlefields and remember lost comrades. This short trip is supported by the Heroes Return scheme which provides funding to eligible individuals and a partner or carer. Until now, visiting all the battlefields of the Western Desert Campaign of WWII has not been easy due to closed borders and red tape. British Veterans Travel, working with operators in Libya, is pleased to announce a trip that visits the strategic points of the campaign from Sidi Rezegh, Gazala, Tobruk and on to Benghazi. This Commemorative Tour will take place in October 2010 and offers the chance for WWII Veterans to visit Libya, for so long a country closed to tourism, and remember comrades whose graves remain carefully tended. Highlights • A jeep drive into the battlefields near Tobruk, including Sidi Rezegh and Gazala • Opportunity for Remembrance at the Knightsbridge and Commonwealth War Cemeteries • Chance to see the Australian Fig Tree Dugout Hospital, Rommel’s Operations Bunker, Tobruk Harbour and the remains of the Lady Be Good aircraft lost on a sortie in 1943 • Visits to the ancient cities of Leptis Magna & Cyrene www.britishveterans.co.uk BV Travel - North Africa 4pp 3/6/10 00:29 Page 3 The Forgotten The Itinerary The itinerary is as follows (subject to change) Day 1 – Thursday 7th October Battlefields PM Flight to Libya; London to Tripoli
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette of TUESDAY, 6Th JUNE, 1950
    jRtttnb, 38937 2879 SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette OF TUESDAY, 6th JUNE, 1950 Registered as a newspaper MONDAY, 12 JUNE, 1950 The War Office, June, 1950. THE ALLIED ARMIES IN ITALY FROM SRD SEPTEMBER, 1943, TO DECEMBER; 1944. PREFACE BY THE WAR OFFICE. PART I. This Despatch was written by Field-Marshal PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND THE Lord Alexander in his capacity as former ASSAULT. Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Armies in Italy. It therefore concentrates primarily upon Strategic Basis of the Campaign. the development of the land campaign and the The invasion of Italy followed closely in time conduct of the land battles. The wider aspects on the conquest of Sicily and may be therefore of the Italian Campaign are dealt with in treated, both historically and strategically, as reports by the Supreme Allied Commander a sequel to it; but when regarded from the (Field-Marshal Lord Wilson) which have point of view of the Grand Strategy of the already been published. It was during this- war there is a great cleavage between the two period that the very close integration of the operations. The conquest of Sicily marks the Naval, Military and Air Forces of the Allied closing stage of that period of strategy which Nations, which had been built up during the began with the invasion of North Africa in North African Campaigns, was firmly con- November, 1942, or which might, on a longer solidated, so that the Italian Campaign was view, be considered as beginning when the first British armoured cars crossed the frontier wire essentially a combined operation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Siege of Giarabub, December 1940
    1 AWM, SVSS paper, 2010 The siege of Giarabub, Tom Richardson The Siege of Giarabub December 1940 – March 1941 Tom Richardson Introduction Between December 1940 and March 1941 a British Commonwealth force, composed primarily of Australian troops, besieged the Italian outpost of Giarabub, on the Egyptian–Libyan border. After three months of skirmishing around the fortress, on 21 March elements of the 18th Brigade, 2nd Australian Imperial Force (AIF), assaulted and captured the oasis. The entire siege cost the Australians 17 men killed and 77 wounded; the Italian garrison, of roughly 2,000 men, had either been killed or captured.1 By any standards it was a resounding victory. The story of Giarabub has been outlined before, both in the Australian official history and in unit histories of those involved. This study has aimed to integrate those histories into a single narrative and also to put Giarabub into a broader political and military context. Frustratingly, the Italian perspective of the siege remains largely untold in Australia, due to barriers of language and technology. Nonetheless, this study draws on as wide a range of sources as possible and in doing so explains how and why several thousand soldiers fought in this remote part of desert that, at first glance, lacks any appreciable relevance to the struggle further north. Giarabub: an introduction. Giarabub is a small oasis that lies on the edge of the Libyan plateau, approximately 320 kilometres south of Bardia and 65 kilometres west of the Egyptian border. To the immediate south lies the Great Sand Sea of the Sahara Desert, and the town stands at the western end of a series of salt marshes that extend east to the Egyptian border.
    [Show full text]