DOCSLIB.ORG

4 at BAY—THE EASTER BATTL E N 21St January 1941 a Small Group Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4 at BAY—THE EASTER BATTL E N 21St January 1941 a Small Group Of CHAPTER 4 AT BAY—THE EASTER BATTL E N 21st January 1941 a small group of officers watched the assault O on Tobruk by the 6th Australian Division . One was Brigadier Mors- head, just arrived in the Middle East from Britain ; another was Lieut- Colonel T. P. Cook, who had been appointed to take charge of the base sub-area to be established there ; a third was Lieut-Commander D . V. Duff, who was later to be Naval Officer-in-Charge at Derna during th e "Benghazi Handicap" and still later in command of the schooners and other small craft running supplies to Tobruk during the siege . Brigadier Morshead spent several days, after Tobruk 's fall, inspecting the defences of the fortress . Thus he acquired a knowledge of their quality . Later, when the 9th Division's withdrawal from the Jebel country of Cyrenaica had become inevitable, it was invaluable to Morshead, foreseein g that the division would have to stand at Tobruk, to know what its defence s had to offer. Lieut-Colonel Cook's task of course involved his remaining in Tobruk . The base sub-area staff (which had been recruited mainly from the A .I.F. staging camp at Amiriya) moved into the town as soon as the harbou r was captured. On 29th January Brigadier Godfrey, who had been appointe d area commander,) established his headquarters in the town area and dele- gated the task of establishing the base to Cook . Within a fortnight, Godfrey was recalled to Palestine and Cook succeeded him as area commander . The speed with which the fortress was organised into a working bas e and provisioned during the next month was remarkable . The stocks of food and other supplies then built up were soon to stand the fortress i n good stead. In the first fortnight two excellent water-pumping stations, on e in the Wadi Sehel just outside the perimeter, the other in the Wadi Auda , which, though mined by the Italians, had not been demolished, were re - paired, the electrical power system was put in working order and the bul k petrol storage system repaired : most of this work was done by the 2/4th Field Company . In addition, in the first fortnight of February, 8,000 of the 25,000 prisoners taken at Tobruk were removed . Much other work was done. Soon after his appointment as area commander, Colonel Cook becam e very concerned at the number of rumours circulating through the fortress — some of them harmful to morale . The way to counter falsehood, he decided , was to publish the truth . Sergeant Williams2 of the Australian Army Ser- vice Corps was commissioned to publish a daily news sheet, under the title Tobruk Truth or "The Dinkum Oil" . Though unpretentious, it serve d its purpose well, publishing news culled from B .B.C. broadcasts together with items of local interest ; like most daily newspapers it was "printed" 3 He had entered Tobruk as a battalion commander, marching with his men in the assault . 2 Capt W. H. Williams, VX27459. 7 Div AASC 1940-42; and public relations appts. Journalist; of Edithvale, Vic; b. Melbourne, 23 Oct 1911 . 112 AT BAY—THE EASTER BATTLE Mar194 1 (in fact, roneoed on a captured Italian duplicator) in the very early hours of the morning so that it could be sent to the depots for issue with the daily rations. It was a going concern when the siege began and continue d throughout the siege ; when later the duplicator was wrecked by bomb-blast , other means of continuing publication were quickly found . To cater for its wider public, it increased its circulation to 800 copies a day ; every unit and detachment received a copy . Sergeant Williams did almost all the work lone-handed . On 8th March, Colonel Cook issued an "appreciation" on the proble m of defending Tobruk. Points in his plan were : to organise the defenders into three components—a mobile striking force, a mobile reserve, and the rest of the garrison ; to withdraw "all troops who are outside the inner perimeter closer to the town" ; and "to place control posts at all roads through the inner perimeter and reconstruct the Italian road blocks" . Tobruk Fortress Operations Order No . 1, embodying this plan, was issue d two days later. On 17th March and succeeding days the 26th Brigade arrived in Tobruk , to be followed on 26th March by the 24th Brigade with two battalions, th e 2/28th and 2/43rd . On 25th March, the 24th Brigade, which Brigadier Godfrey now commanded, took over duties from the 26th Brigade as th e latter moved out to join Morshead's division on the escarpment above Benghazi. Godfrey, with his operations staff officer, Major Ogle, 3 made a detailed reconnaissance of the defences, after which he suggested to Cook (on 31st March) that the defence plan should be modified by the occupation of part of the perimeter defences . In the next few days the situation in Cyrenaic a deteriorated . By 6th April the perimeter defences in the west had been occupied in a wide arc from the Derna Road to Post R19 . All available troops were used : Australian Army Service Corps men, unemployed because of the shortage of vehicles, took over prisoner-of-war guard duties , freeing a company of the 2/23rd Battalion . In the story of the defence of Tobruk, a place of honour will alway s be reserved for the "Bush Artillery"—those captured Italian guns in great variety of size, vintage, and reliability, that infantrymen without gunner training manned and fired in a manner as spirited as the fire order s employed were unorthodox . The bush artillery was born before the sieg e began. When General Neame issued his "Policy for Defence of Cyrenaica" on 20th March, he included a paragraph providing for the organisation of the Tobruk defences which contained the sentence : "Italian field guns will he placed in position for anti-tank duties ." Colonel Cook found that most Italian guns at Tobruk were not usable because of corrosion throug h exposure to the weather or damage before capture . He brought a large number of Italian 40-mm anti-tank guns from Bardia (in contravention of instructions issued by Neame's headquarters) and gave the workshops 8 Lt-Col R . W. G. Ogle, DSO, ED, NX12305 . 2/17 Bn ; BM 24 Bde 1940-41 ; CO 2/15 Bn 1941-42 ; staff appointments 1943-45. Electrical and mechanical engineer; of Wollongong, NSW ; b. Waratah, NSW, 21 Nov 1904 . Apr 1941 WAVELL AT TOBRUK 113 the task of reconditioning them and the few usable field guns left in Tobruk. Cook next organised a school to train the infantry in their use . It was run by the Nottinghamshire Sherwood Rangers, who were mannin g the coastal defence guns. 4 The object, as Cook later said, was "to run half-day classes in how to load, aim and fire an Italian gun with the least risk to the firer and the maximum to the enemy . they did learn some- thing from this, using lanyards of telephone wire 100 feet long, chocking wheels to gain elevation " . Brigadier Godfrey cooperated enthusiastically . As the reconditioned guns left the workshops, he allotted them to unit s and saw to it that they were well manned and sited . The 2/28th Battalion war diary has an interesting entry on 7th April : Personnel of No. 6 Platoon s did a good job on previous night which was pullin g into position of five Italian 75-mm field pieces together with ammunition for the same. This brought total to 8 all manned by 4 Platoon . 6 On 7th April the 18th Brigade (Brigadier Wootten) arrived, som e parties coming by road, but the main body by sea . Brigadier Wootten wa s appointed commander of the force in Tobruk, Lieut-Colonel J. E. G. Martin taking over acting command of the brigade . Wootten decided that , with the larger number of troops, the whole perimeter should be occupied , the 24th Brigade, with its two battalions and attached troops in the wester n sector, the 18th Brigade in the eastern sector, with two battalions on th e perimeter and one in reserve . These positions were being taken up when , on the morning of the 8th, General Wavell and General Lavarack flew in . Wavell had foreseen, after he had returned to Cairo from Neame's head - quarters on the evening of 3rd April, that the abandonment of Cyrenaic a could not be long delayed . He knew the time for deciding whether an attempt should be made to hold Tobruk was imminent . Having advised th e Chiefs of Staff that the plans for operations in Greece and the Dodecanes e would have to be modified, he lost no time in sending to the desert fron t all reinforcements he could muster. An improvised tank force comprising the 1st Royal Tank Regiment with 11 cruiser and 15 light tanks, the 107t h R.H.A., the 14th Light Anti-Aircraft Regiment, the 11th Hussars (les s one squadron), the 3rd Royal Horse Artillery (whose "J " Battery was already with the 2nd Armoured Division) and the 4th Royal Hors e Artillery were ordered on the 4th to move next day to the desert . The 7th Australian Division (Major-General Lavarack) was at this time pre - paring to move from Palestine to Greece ; General Lavarack and a nucleu s staff had already received orders to proceed to Alexandria, arriving on 5th April for embarkation on the 6th . Passing through Cairo on 4th April, Lavarack received a message directing him to report to General Head- quarters.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brevity, Skorpion & Battleaxe
    DESERT WAR PART THREE: BREVITY, SKORPION & BATTLEAXE OPERATION BREVITY MAY 15 – 16 1941 Operation Sonnenblume had seen Rommel rapidly drive the distracted and over-stretched British and Commonwealth forces in Cyrenaica back across the Egyptian border. Although the battlefront now lay in the border area, the port city of Tobruk - 100 miles inside Libya - had resisted the Axis advance, and its substantial Australian and British garrison of around 27,000 troops constituted a significant threat to Rommel's lengthy supply chain. He therefore committed his main strength to besieging the city, leaving the front line only thinly held. Conceived by the Commander-in-Chief of the British Middle East Command, General Archibald Wavell, Operation Brevity was a limited Allied offensive conducted in mid-May 1941. Brevity was intended to be a rapid blow against weak Axis front-line forces in the Sollum - Capuzzo - Bardia area of the border between Egypt and Libya. Operation Brevity's main objectives were to gain territory from which to launch a further planned offensive toward the besieged Tobruk, and the depletion of German and Italian forces in the region. With limited battle-ready units to draw on in the wake of Rommel's recent successes, on May 15 Brigadier William Gott, with the 22nd Guards Brigade and elements of the 7th Armoured Division attacked in three columns. The Royal Air Force allocated all available fighters and a small force of bombers to the operation. The strategically important Halfaya Pass was taken against stiff Italian opposition. Reaching the top of the Halfaya Pass, the 22nd Guards Brigade came under heavy fire from an Italian Bersaglieri (Marksmen) infantry company, supported by anti-tank guns, under the command of Colonel Ugo Montemurro.
    [Show full text]
  • (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies A Stepping Stone to Success: Operation Battleaxe (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine Mike Bechthold On 16 February 1943 a meeting was held in Tripoli attended by senior American and British officers to discuss the various lessons learned during the Libyan campaign. The focus of the meeting was a presentation by General Bernard Montgomery. This "gospel according to Montgomery," as it was referred to by Air Chief Marshal Arthur Tedder, set out very clearly Monty's beliefs on how air power should be used to support the army.1 Among the tenets Montgomery articulated was his conviction of the importance of air power: "Any officer who aspires to hold high command in war must understand clearly certain principles regarding the use of air power." Montgomery also believed that flexibility was the greatest asset of air power. This allowed it to be applied as a "battle-winning factor of the first importance." As well, he fully endorsed the air force view of centralized control: "Nothing could be more fatal to successful results than to dissipate the air resource into small packets placed under the control of army formation commanders, with each packet working on its own plan. The soldier must not expect, or wish, to exercise direct command over air striking forces." Montgomery concluded his discussion by stating that it was of prime importance for the army and air 1 Arthur Tedder, With Prejudice: The war memoirs of Marshal of the Royal Air Force, Lord Tedder (London: Cassell, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Infantry Division (1941-43)]
    7 February 2017 [6 (70) INFANTRY DIVISION (1941-43)] th 6 Infantry Division (1) Headquarters, 6th Infantry Division & Employment Platoon 14th Infantry Brigade (2) Headquarters, 14th Infantry Brigade & Signal Section 1st Bn. The Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire Regiment 2nd Bn. The York and Lancaster Regiment 2nd Bn. The Black Watch (Royal Highland Regiment) 16th Infantry Brigade (3) Headquarters, 16th Infantry Brigade & Signal Section 2nd Bn. The Leicestershire Regiment 2nd Bn. The Queen’s Royal Regiment (West Surrey) 1st Bn. The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (Princess Louise’s) (4) 23rd Infantry Brigade (5) Headquarters, 23rd Infantry Brigade & Signal Section 4th (Westmorland) Bn. The Border Regiment 1st Bn. The Durham Light Infantry (6) Czechoslovak Infantry Battalion No 11 East (7) Divisional Troops 60th (North Midland) Field Regiment, Royal Artillery (8) (H.Q., 237th (Lincoln) & 238th (Grimsby) Field Batteries, Royal Artillery) 2nd Field Company, Royal Engineers 12th Field Company, Royal Engineers 54th Field Company, Royal Engineers 219th (1st London) Field Park Company, Royal Engineers 6th Divisional Signals, Royal Corps of Signals © www.BritishMilitaryH istory.co.uk Page 1 7 February 2017 [6 (70) INFANTRY DIVISION (1941-43)] Headquarters, 6th Infantry Divisional Royal Army Service Corps (9) 61st Company, Royal Army Service Corps 145th Company, Royal Army Service Corps 419th Company, Royal Army Service Corps Headquarters, 6th Infantry Divisional Royal Army Medical Corps (10) 173rd Field Ambulance, Royal Army Medical Corps 189th
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Chinese Labour Corps in Repairing and Maintaining British
    Published in Surveying and Built Environment, Vol. 21, Issue 12 (Dec. 2011), 12-20. (ISSN 1816-9554) Chinese Eyes on British Tanks: Historical Verification of a War Heritage Lee Ho Yin ______________________________________________ ABSTRACT This paper is about a British military tradition with a Chinese connection. It has taken the author several years of research to dispel the myth that has long shrouded the true origins of a regimental tradition of the 1st Royal Tank Regiment of the British Army. This tradition is a pair of eyes, known as the "Chinese Eyes," painted on the bows or turrets of British tanks from World War I to the present day. As such, the "Chinese Eyes" can be regarded as an intangible heritage expressed on the tangible hardware of the British Army. Using the research methodology for architectural conservation, the author attempts to rediscover obscured historical evidence, using it to chronologically reconstruct the events leading to the creation of this tradition. KEYWORDS Military heritage, historical research, interpretation, authenticity. Director, Architectural Conservation Programme (ACP), Faculty of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected] 1 INTRODUCTION: METHODOLOGY AND ORIGINS OF RESEARCH It is a little known fact that British tanks, produced in the thousands during World War I, were cared for by the skillful hands of the Chinese Labour Corps.1 Who would have thought that there is such a seemingly improbable connection between Chinese men and British war machines? More incredibly, who would have thought that a Chinese individual – an individual with an indirect link with Hong Kong – was responsible for creating a famous military tradition of British tanks – a pair of eyes, known as the "Chinese Eyes" that have been painted on British tanks since World War I.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1 British Armored Car Vehicle Name/WD Serial Number Listing by Kevin Tucker Armored Car Type WD WD Number Name Sqn / Troop Aos Regiment / Unit Date Location
    Table 1 British Armored Car Vehicle Name/WD Serial Number Listing by Kevin Tucker Armored Car Type WD WD Number Name Sqn / Troop AoS Regiment / Unit Date Location AEC, Armoured Car Mk I F 55010 1942 Western Desert AEC, Armoured Car Mk II F 83573 1943 UK AEC, Armoured Car Mk II F 88579 AEC, Armoured Car Mk II F 88581 AEC, Armoured Car Mk III F 89067 44 1st Royal Dragoons, 12th Corps 1944 Holland AEC, Armoured Car Mk III F 88707 D Sqn 44 2nd Household Cavalry Regiment, VIII Corps AEC, Armoured Car Mk III F 88827 AEC, Armoured Car Mk III F 88908 AEC, Armoured Car Mk III F 88984 Beaverette M 4816486 Beaverette, Mk II M 431616 Recce Unit 1st Polish Corps UK Beaverette, Mk II F 1293049 Recce Unit 1st Polish Corps UK Beaverette, Mk II F 1293060 Recce Unit 1st Polish Corps 1941 GB Beaverette, Mk II F 16895x Recce Unit 1st Polish Corps UK Beaverette, Mk II M 4316xx Recce Unit 1st Polish Corps UK Beaverette, Mk III M 4473350 Chevrolet, C15TA CZ 4287945 52 10th Armoured Regiment, Fort Garry Horse, 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade, 5th Canadian Armoured Division 1945 Holland Chevrolet, C15TA CZ 4288056 52 10th Armoured Regiment, Fort Garry Horse, 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade, 5th Canadian Armoured Division 1945 Holland Chevrolet, C15TA CZ 4288170 52 10th Armoured Regiment, Fort Garry Horse, 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade, 5th Canadian Armoured Division 1945 Holland Chevrolet, C15TA CZ 4288212 52 10th Armoured Regiment, Fort Garry Horse, 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade, 5th Canadian Armoured Division 1945 Holland Chevrolet, C15TA CZ 4288020 Royal Hamilton
    [Show full text]
  • Last Counter-Attack and a Controversial Relief The
    CHAPTER 8 LAST COUNTER-ATTACK AND A CONTROVERSIAL RELIEF HE men of the Tobruk garrison had always thought that the term o f T their confinement would be the time taken to drive off the besiegers . In the midsummer month of July when the prospect of relief by a frontie r offensive seemed indefinitely remote, General Blarney proposed anothe r kind of relief : relief by sea . His request provoked a strong disagreement between the British and Australian Governments ; but confidences were so well kept that to all but one or two of the Australians who were in the fortress the first intimation that their going thence had been th e subject of controversy was the publication after the war of Sir Winston Churchill's The Grand Alliance, in which he gave his own account of the dispute. There he declared that it gave him pain to have to relate the incident, but to suppress it indefinitely would have been impossible . "Besides, " he wrote, "the Australian people have a right to know what happened and why." 1 For that very reason it was unfortunate that, i n relating the differences between the two Governments, Sir Winsto n Churchill quoted extensively from his own messages to successive Aus- tralian Prime Ministers but did not disclose the text of their replies . If the Australian people had depended solely on Sir Winston Churchill 's account for knowledge of what happened and why, they might have been left with some erroneous impressions . In particular it might have been inferred that when Mr Fadden's Government insisted that the relief o f the 9th Division should proceed, it did so not because of a strong convic- tion based on broad considerations advanced by its military advisers bu t because it had been induced by "hard pressure from its political opponents " to turn a deaf ear to Churchill's entreaties .
    [Show full text]
  • BAOR July 1989
    BAOR ORDER OF BATTLE JULY 1989 “But Pardon, and Gentles all, The flat unraised spirits that have dared On this unworthy scaffold to bring forth So great an object….” Chorus, Henry V Act 1, Prologue This document began over five years ago from my frustration in the lack of information (or just plain wrong information) regarding the British Army of The Rhine in general and the late Cold War in particular. The more I researched through books, correspondence, and through direct questions to several “Old & Bold” on Regimental Association Forums, the more I became determined to fill in this gap. The results are what you see in the following pages. Before I begin a list of acknowledgements let me recognize my two co-authors, for this is as much their work as well as mine. “PM” was instrumental in sharing his research on the support Corps, did countless hours of legwork, and never failed to dig up information on some of my arcane questions. “John” made me “THINK” British Army! He has been an inspiration; a large part of this work would have not been possible without him. He added the maps and the color formation signs, as well as reformatting the whole document. I can only humbly say that these two gentlemen deserve any and all accolades as a result of this document. Though we have put much work into this document it is far from finished. Anyone who would like to contribute information of their time in BAOR or sources please contact me at [email protected]. The document will be updated with new information periodically.
    [Show full text]
  • " November 1994
    ) '. MAG A Z I \ E 0 F TilE B HIT I S H eLl Il. B A \ C K 0 K ') - " NOVEMBER 1994 CONTENTS o Regular Features 5 From the Editor 6 From the Manager 10 Management News 12 New Members 24 Calendar 44 Committee Page 46 Final Countdown Contributions Sports Sections If you would like to contribute to OUTPOST contact Bea Grunwell on 258 9509. All photograplls and While Members are 19 Tennis articles must be rece ived by Bea on encouraged to write 21 Cricket 1S[ of each month to OUTPOST the 22 Golf Club reserves the right to edit any 23 BCLG contributions both 26 Badminton j for reasons of space 28 Squash o and appropriateness . •1 Features ~. 7 Elephant Round Up ~I 8 Loy Kratong It' 9 Children'S Sports Camp 16 Guy Fawkes 43 Guess who this is Specials 30 St Andrews Ball 33 Churchilds Bar 34 Intersection Sports Day 36 Bangkok's Half Hour ADVERTISING o 38 BC Brewery Round Up 40 Ploenchit Fair 45 Club Photo Round-up Please contact The British Oub 48 Poetry Bea Gnmwell 189 Surawong Rd on Bangkok 10500 Tel/Fax 258 9509 Tel: 2340247 234 2592 Attractive discounts Fax: 235 1560 available for long term advertisers! () 3 ABU DHABI. Al KHORAR • ATHENS. BAH IA· BA HRAIN. BAN GKOK· BARCElONA . BOSTON. BRA ZZAVILLE . CAIRO · CHAM PQlLlON • CH ICAGO · CY PR US . DAKAR I Le Meridien Phuket. -~ > Where it's best to stay on because the days ~" ,.z never seem long enough ;a~ "~ m ~ § rlI § ~ ~ );s: I ~ ~ I ~ ' J ~ ~ ~ § ~ "~ "~ "' ~ ~ ~ § With a secluded beach at your doorstep, plenty of recreational y opportunities and the easy going pace of island living, the simpler ~ Ii pleasures in life al'e seldom enjoyed more than at Le Meridien ~ Phuket.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Armoured Division (1941-42)]
    3 September 2020 [7 ARMOURED DIVISION (1941-42)] th 7 Armoured Division (1) Headquarters, 7th Armoured Division 4th Armoured Brigade (2) Headquarters, 4th Armoured Brigade & Signal Section 4th Royal Tank Regiment (3) 5th Royal Tank Regiment (3) 7th Royal Tank Regiment (4) 7th Armoured Brigade (5) Headquarters, 7th Armoured Brigade & Signal Section 2nd Royal Tank Regiment 7th Support Group (6) Headquarters, 7th Support Group & Signal Section 1st Bn. The King’s Royal Rifle Corps 2nd Bn. The Rifle Brigade (Prince Consort’s Own) 3rd Regiment, Royal Horse Artillery 4th Regiment, Royal Horse Artillery 1st Light Anti-Aircraft Regiment, Royal Artillery Divisional Troops 11th Hussars (Prince Albert’s Own) (7) 4th Field Squadron, Royal Engineers (8) 143rd Field Park Squadron, Royal Engineers (8) 7th Armoured Divisional Signals, Royal Corps of Signals ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Page 1 3 September 2020 [7 ARMOURED DIVISION (1941-42)] NOTES: 1. This was a regular army division stationed in Egypt. It had been formed as the Mobile Division in September 1938, as a result of the raised tension caused by the Munich Crisis. Initially called the ‘Matruh Mobile Force’, it was founded by Major General P. C. S. HOBART. This is the Order of Battle for the division on 15 May 1941. This was the date of the start of Operation Brevity, the operation to reach Tobruk The division was under command of Headquarters, British Troops in Egypt until 16 May 1941. On that date, it came under command of Headquarters, Western Desert Force (W.D.F.). It remained under command of W.D.F.
    [Show full text]
  • N M2leco PROPERTY of U.S. ARMY
    Typical Axis Emplacement in the Omars Captured German "Teller" Mines UNCLASSIFIED TY REGRADED - BYAUTHORI ,BYZI- N M2LecO Military Intelligence Service Information Bulletin No. 11 THE BATTLE OF THE OMARS War Department Washington, D.C. UNCLASSIFIED PROPERTY OF U.S. ARMY cRS cl RE Tj~" r Military Intelligence Service Information Bulletin War Department No. 11 Washington, April 15, 1942 MIS 461 NOTICE 1. Information Bulletins, which have replaced Tentative Lessons Bul- letins, have a dual purpose: (1) to provide all officers with reason- ably confirmed information from official and other reliable sources, and (2) to serve as material for lectures to troops. 2. Non-divisional units are being supplied with copies on a basis similar to the approved distribution for divisional commands, as fol- lows: INF DIV CAV DIV ARMD DIV Div Hq 8 Div Hq 4 Div Hq 11 Rcn Troop 1 Ord Co 1 Rcn Bn 1 Sig Co 1 Sig Troop 1 Engr Bn 1 Engr Bn Rcn Sq 1 Med Bn 1 Med Bn .T Figr Sq 1 Maint Bn 1 QM Bn of; led Sq 1 Supply Bn 1 Hq Inf Regt, = :0 Sq 1 Div Train Hq 1 Inf Bn, 1 ea e Cav Brig, 2 ea 4 Armd Regt, 4 ea 8 0-M F , _ Hq Div Arty _t C*v Regt, 4 ea 16 FA Bn, 1 ea 3 FA Bn, 1 ea so==as& HX Div Arty 1 Inf Regt 4 FA Bn, 1 ea 3 32 34 Distribution to air units is being made by the A-2 of Army Air Forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Armoured Corps) Page 1 of 3
    Record Details for Richard George Brooke Barrow (Royal Armoured Corps) Page 1 of 3 Record Details for Richard George Brooke Barrow (Royal Armoured Corps) Back First Name: Richard George Brooke Initials: R G B Surname: Barrow DOB: Circa 1923 Age: 22 Birth Town: West London Nationality: British Resided County: Sussex. Date of Death: 24/01/1945 Information: Parents: Rear-Admiral Benjamin Wingate Barrow and Charlotte Constance Barrow, of Claremont, Cape Province, South Africa. Rank: Lieutenant Service Number: 245686 Campaign Medals: War Medal 1939-1945 As with most Armed Forces Serving Personnel during the conflict of World War Two, Richard George Brooke Barrow was entitled to the War Medal 1939-1945. This medal was awarded to all full time service personnel who had completed 28 days service between 3rd September 1939 and the 2nd September 1945. Eligible personnel who had been “Mentioned In Despatches” during the War were entitled to wear a bronze oak leaf emblem on the ribbon. Those eligible for a campaign star, yet who had their service cut short by death, wounds or capture by the enemy, still qualified for this medal. 1939-45 Star Given the information available to us it is likely that Richard George Brooke Barrow was awarded the 1939-45 Star for operational Service in the Second World War between 3rd September 1939, and 2nd September 1945. Richard George Brooke Barrow would have been awarded this star if their service period was terminated by their death or disability due to service. Also the award of a gallantry medal or “Mention In Despatches” also produced the award of this medal, regardless of their service duration.
    [Show full text]
  • VICTORY at SIDI BARRANI 28 Nov-6 Dec Preparations That Were Being Made Around Them
    CHAPTER 6 VICTORY AT SIDI BARRAN I HE stage was now set for the opening of the desert battle which Genera l T Wavell and his subordinates had discussed before the Italian invasion of Greece. Thus far the new theatre of war had made relatively smal l demands on Wavell's and Longmore's forces, and the Italian Army's failure to overcome the Greeks lowered an already low estimate of it s efficiency . Although Western Desert Force was still greatly outnumbered by General Bergonzoli's army, it had received useful reinforcements . It will be recalled that in October two tank regiments from England ha d joined the 7th Armoured Division, bringing its two armoured brigade s each to their proper strength of three regiments ; and the 7th Royal Tank Regiment had arrived, equipped with heavy "Matilda" tanks to be use d with infantry to break into strong defensive positions . In September the 4th Indian Division had been completed by adding to it the 16th Britis h Brigade ; in November its own third brigade arrived . In the Matruh Fortress was assembled a force equal to two infantry brigades . The 4th Ne w Zealand Brigade, had, since September, been in reserve either at Dab a or Bagush ; and on the edge of the Delta were the 6th Australian Division , now more or less complete, and the Polish brigade . Thus in three month s the forces west of Alexandria had increased from two weak divisions t o three at full strength or close to it, plus four infantry brigades ; and within a few weeks the New Zealand and the 7th Australian Divisions woul d be complete, in units if not equipment, and the 2nd Armoured Divisio n would have arrived.
    [Show full text]