DOCSLIB.ORG

Taking, Keeping and Display of Live Reptiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT POLICY STATEMENT NO.22 TAKING, KEEPING AND DISPLAY OF LIVE REPTILES NOVEMBER 1992 1. BACKGROUND Western Australia has a diverse reptile fauna numbering in excess of 400 species in three turtle families, seven snake families and the crocodile family. All indigenous reptiles are protected fauna under the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950. It is an offence to take (defined to include kill, capture, molest, hunt or attempt to do so) or possess reptiles except in accordance with a licence. The only exceptions are the taking of certain venomous land snakes and sea snakes when they constitute an immediate danger to human life, farm stock or domestic animals (open season notice in Government Gazette No. 41 of 22 June 1984); secondly, the temporary care of sick or injured fauna in accordance with Wildlife Conservation Regulation 28(2) and thirdly, the taking of reptiles by Aborigines in accordance with Section 23(1) of the Wildlife Conservation Act. The Department's objective is to protect and conserve all species of reptiles in the wild throughout Western Australia. Experience has shown that, in order to facilitate this, it is necessary to restrict and control the taking, keeping and display of reptiles. However, a small number of well controlled and well managed collections and displays can play a positive role in conservation through public information and education, and through the contributions of professionally qualified and some amateur herpetologists (i.e. persons who may have no formal scientific qualifications or association with scientific institutions, but have a strong affinity with, and desire to study, reptiles and demonstrated reptile handling experience) to our understanding of the biology and ecology of reptiles. There is also a demand for a small number of collections to be maintained for venom supply purposes. The need for a strict policy regarding the keeping of reptiles in captivity is based on experience in Western Australia, interstate and overseas. The practise of keeping snakes and some other reptiles for hobby purposes can ultimately have the potential to threaten the survival of wild populations, particularly of species favoured by collectors. There has been limited demand to date in Western Australia by members of the public to keep snakes and other reptiles in captivity. It is, however, a well established hobby in some other States and countries. It would probably become so here if there were a liberal policy for the taking and keeping of reptiles. Western Australia has a number of reptile species, particularly rarer species and pythons, which are greatly sought after by collectors, both within and outside Australia, and are therefore of high value. An increase in taking from the wild could adversely affect the conservation status of the scarcer varieties. Liberalisation of policy covering taking and Policy Statement No. 22 Page 10 keeping would inevitably increase rates of collection from wild populations and disturbance of animals and their habitats. Snakes and lizards, in particular, present special problems with respect to administration and inspection of animal collections. They can be difficult and, in some cases, dangerous to handle and difficult to identify to species level. On the other hand, experienced handlers find them easy to catch from the wild, conceal and transport. Many species will breed in captivity, creating uncertainty as to the origin of individuals. In addition, captive reptiles which escape or are intentionally released into areas other than those which they originate from, can have a adverse effect on wild populations. There is considerable illegal collection and trading of reptiles in Australia as well as smuggling of reptiles out of Australia. A liberal policy towards the taking, holding and display of reptiles would increase law enforcement problems, as illegal activities could be facilitated by the "cover" that would be provided. The costs of administration and inspection in the case of liberal policy would be high. To allow imports, involving the keeping of reptiles for private purposes, even with the use of transponder chip implants for identification and DNA fingerprinting technology to check breeding claims, would prove costly to administer and enforce and pose a threat of wild establishment of species exotic to the location of keeping. The Minister has discretionary power to issue licences to take and keep reptiles for purposes prescribed in the Wildlife Conservation Regulations. Reptiles are protected fauna and the overriding consideration in licensing decisions is the conservation of reptiles in the wild, which is the Department's statutory responsibility. The granting of a licence is therefore a privilege and not a right. 2. OBJECTIVE To assist in the protection and conservation of reptiles in the wild throughout Western Australia by restricting and controlling their taking, keeping and display. 3. POLICY The Department will permit the taking and keeping of reptiles for public information and education, scientific research, limited private study and venom supply purposes subject to the objective in Section 2 above and the policies and conditions set out below. Commercial trading in reptiles will not be permitted. 4. TAKING OF REPTILES FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND MUSEUM COLLECTIONS Policy Statement No. 22 Page 10 4.1 Comment There is a need to provide for scientific research on reptiles by bona fide researchers employed by, or formally associated with, recognised scientific institutions. This can be achieved by licensing the taking and keeping of reptiles for scientific purposes. (Private study by approved amateur herpetologists is to be provided for under education/public purposes licences.) Some amateur herpetologists wish to conduct private expeditions to photograph and study reptiles. In these circumstances, they may locate possible new species or specimen of species poorly represented in museum collections. Where such private field trips are endorses by the WA Museum, it is appropriate for licences to be issued for limited collection of unusual specimens and poorly represented species, provided all specimens are deposited with the WA Museum. 4.2 Policy The taking of reptiles from the wild, and their keeping, may be permitted in the case of research to be conducted by persons with recognised scientific qualifications and/or experience and an association with recognised scientific institutions. 4.3 Implementation 4.3.1 Regulation 17 licences (Licence to Take Fauna for Scientific Purposes) may be issued to bona fide researchers with recognised scientific qualifications and/or experience and an association with recognised scientific institutions. 4.3.2 Application involving species declared pursuant to Section 14(2)(ba) of the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 to be "fauna which is likely to become extinct, or is rare" will be approved only in special cases and where there is a conservation benefit. Applications involving species declared to be "fauna which is otherwise in need of special protection" will be considered on a case by case basis. 4.3.3 Regulation 17 licences will not generally be issued to amateur herpetologists, unless they meet the requirements of paragraph 4.3.1 above, by working on behalf of a recognised scientific institution. 4.3.4 Amateur herpetologists may also be issued with Regulation 15 licences providing for the taking of limited numbers of museum specimens when embarking on private field trips, if they can demonstrate, by a written endorsement, that they have support of the WA Museum. 5. PRIVATE KEEPING OF REPTILES 5.1 COMMENT People who wish to keep reptiles in a private capacity fall into four broad categories: (i) Those who handle reptiles in the course of their occupation and who wish to continue their activities at home; (ii) Those (including amateur herpetologists) who have a very strong affinity with reptiles and who use their knowledge, or wish to do so, to serve the community in various ways, e.g.: Policy Statement No. 22 Page 10 - supply of snake venom to hospitals and research institutions; - public education; - provision of a reptile removal service and depository for injured reptiles; - private study; (iii) Schools or local groups who wish to keep reptiles for interest; and (iv) Hobbyists who wish to keep reptiles as pets for their own interest. The second group can perform a useful service by dealing with injured reptiles and removing dangerous reptiles from private homes and gardens. While some carry out private study/research, it is not generally the primary function or interest of amateur herpetologists. There is, however, scope for some dedicated and experienced amateur herpetologists to contribute to our knowledge of reptiles through basic biological and `herpetocultural` study. In so doing they can provide a `public benefit`. The licensing of amateur herpetologists will inflict a cost to CALM in terms of licence issue and monitoring of the keeping, breeding and disposal of reptiles. There are however potential conservation benefits from the increased knowledge of reptiles that a limited system of private keeping and study can provide. While some reptile species can be raised and kept in captivity on artificial diets, it is common for species to prefer and in some cases require live prey, including live species of protected fauna. Many snake species, for instance, are dependant on a natural diet of small lizards and frogs. It is unacceptable to allow the proliferation of the taking of protected fauna for food purposes for captive snakes and as such the private keeping of snakes which require a live fauna diet needs to be strictly controlled. 5.2 Policy 5.2.1 The taking and keeping of reptiles as pets or for private hobby purposes will not be permitted. 5.2.2 Reptiles may be permitted to be kept in a private collection for educational or public purposes where at least one of the following criteria is met. a) snakes may be kept in a private collection for educational or public purposes under a Regulation 16 Licence: (i) where it can be shown that there is a need for a collection of snakes to be available for education (e.g.
Recommended publications
  • Lake Pinaroo Ramsar Site

    Lake Pinaroo Ramsar Site

    Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Disclaimer The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW (DECC) has compiled the Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECC does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. © State of New South Wales and Department of Environment and Climate Change DECC is pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290, Sydney South 1232 Phone: 131555 (NSW only – publications and information requests) (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DECC 2008/275 ISBN 978 1 74122 839 7 June 2008 Printed on environmentally sustainable paper Cover photos Inset upper: Lake Pinaroo in flood, 1976 (DECC) Aerial: Lake Pinaroo in flood, March 1976 (DECC) Inset lower left: Blue-billed duck (R. Kingsford) Inset lower middle: Red-necked avocet (C. Herbert) Inset lower right: Red-capped plover (C. Herbert) Summary An ecological character description has been defined as ‘the combination of the ecosystem components, processes, benefits and services that characterise a wetland at a given point in time’.
  • Neurotoxic Effects of Venoms from Seven Species of Australasian Black Snakes (Pseudechis): Efficacy of Black and Tiger Snake Antivenoms

    Neurotoxic Effects of Venoms from Seven Species of Australasian Black Snakes (Pseudechis): Efficacy of Black and Tiger Snake Antivenoms

    Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (2005) 32, 7–12 NEUROTOXIC EFFECTS OF VENOMS FROM SEVEN SPECIES OF AUSTRALASIAN BLACK SNAKES (PSEUDECHIS): EFFICACY OF BLACK AND TIGER SNAKE ANTIVENOMS Sharmaine Ramasamy,* Bryan G Fry† and Wayne C Hodgson* *Monash Venom Group, Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Clayton and †Australian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia SUMMARY the sole clad of venomous snakes capable of inflicting bites of medical importance in the region.1–3 The Pseudechis genus (black 1. Pseudechis species (black snakes) are among the most snakes) is one of the most widespread, occupying temperate, widespread venomous snakes in Australia. Despite this, very desert and tropical habitats and ranging in size from 1 to 3 m. little is known about the potency of their venoms or the efficacy Pseudechis australis is one of the largest venomous snakes found of the antivenoms used to treat systemic envenomation by these in Australia and is responsible for the vast majority of black snake snakes. The present study investigated the in vitro neurotoxicity envenomations. As such, the venom of P. australis has been the of venoms from seven Australasian Pseudechis species and most extensively studied and is used in the production of black determined the efficacy of black and tiger snake antivenoms snake antivenom. It has been documented that a number of other against this activity. Pseudechis from the Australasian region can cause lethal 2. All venoms (10 ␮g/mL) significantly inhibited indirect envenomation.4 twitches of the chick biventer cervicis nerve–muscle prepar- The envenomation syndrome produced by Pseudechis species ation and responses to exogenous acetylcholine (ACh; varies across the genus and is difficult to characterize because the 1 mmol/L), but not to KCl (40 mmol/L), indicating activity at offending snake is often not identified.3,5 However, symptoms of post-synaptic nicotinic receptors on the skeletal muscle.
  • Translocations and Fauna Reconstruction Sites: Western Shield Review—February 2003

    Translocations and Fauna Reconstruction Sites: Western Shield Review—February 2003

    108 Conservation Science W. Aust. 5 (2) : 108–121P.R. Mawson (2004) Translocations and fauna reconstruction sites: Western Shield review—February 2003 PETER R. MAWSON1 1Senior Zoologist, Wildlife Branch , Department of Conservation and Land Management, Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983. [email protected] SUMMARY address this problem, but will result in slower progress towards future milestones for some species. The captive-breeding of western barred bandicoots Objectives has also been hampered by disease issues, but this problem is dealt with in more detail elsewhere in this edition (see The objectives of Western Shield with regard to fauna Morris et al. this issue). translocations were to re-introduce a range of native fauna There is a clear need to better define criteria that will species to a number of sites located primarily in the south- be used to determine the success or failure of translocation west of Western Australia. At some sites whole suites of programs, and for those same criteria to be included in fauna needed to be re-introduced, while at others only Recovery Plans and Interim Recovery Plans. one or a few species were targeted for re-introduction. A small number of the species that are currently the Integration of Western Shield activities with recovery subject of captive-breeding programs and or translocations actions and co-operative arrangements with community do not have Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans, groups, wildlife carers, wildlife sanctuaries, Perth Zoo and contrary to CALM Policy Statement No. 50. In other educational outcomes were other key objectives. cases the priorities by which plans are written does not Achievements reflect the IUCN rank assigned those species by the Western Australian Threatened Species Scientific The fauna translocation objectives defined in the founding Committee.
  • Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist Reptiles

    Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist Reptiles

    Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist ow if there are so many lizards then they should make tasty N meals for someone. Many of the lizard-eaters come from their Reptiles own kind, especially the snake-like legless lizards and the snakes themselves. The former are completely harmless to people but the latter should be left alone and assumed to be venomous. Even so it odern reptiles are at the most diverse in the tropics and the is quite safe to watch a snake from a distance but some like the Md rylands of the world. The Australian arid zone has some of the Mulga Snake can be curious and this could get a little most diverse reptile communities found anywhere. In and around a disconcerting! single tussock of spinifex in the western deserts you could find 18 species of lizards. Fowlers Gap does not have any spinifex but even he most common lizards that you will encounter are the large so you do not have to go far to see reptiles in the warmer weather. Tand ubiquitous Shingleback and Central Bearded Dragon. The diversity here is as astonishing as anywhere. Imagine finding six They both have a tendency to use roads for passage, warming up or species of geckos ranging from 50-85 mm long, all within the same for display. So please slow your vehicle down and then take evasive genus. Or think about a similar diversity of striped skinks from 45-75 action to spare them from becoming a road casualty. The mm long! How do all these lizards make a living in such a dry and Shingleback is often seen alone but actually is monogamous and seemingly unproductive landscape? pairs for life.
  • 2008-09, the Zoo’S Fundraising Program, Wildlife During the Year the Board Also Commenced an Continues to Go from Strength to Strength

    2008-09, the Zoo’S Fundraising Program, Wildlife During the Year the Board Also Commenced an Continues to Go from Strength to Strength

    contents Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL REPORT 2009 contents Our Purpose To secure long term populations of species in natural environments while engaging the community in global conservation action. Perth Zoo Location In line with State Government requirements, This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in 20 Labouchere Road Perth Zoo’s annual report – the Zoological whole or in part for study or training purposes if Parks Authority Annual Report 2008-2009 – is an acknowledgment of the source is included. South Perth, Western Australia. published in an electronic format with limited Such use must not be for the purpose of sale or Postal Address use of graphics and illustrations to help minimise commercial exploitation. Subject to the Copyright download times. Act, reproduction, storage in a retrieval system PO Box 489 or transmission in any form by any means of Perth Zoo encourages people to use recycled South Perth any part of the work other than for the purposes paper if they print a copy of this report or above is not permitted without prior written Western Australia 6951 sections of it. For the convenience of readers and authorisation from the Zoological Parks Authority. to minimise download times and print outs, the Contact Numbers annual report has been presented in chapters, as Information about this report and requests and Telephone (08) 9474 0444 well as the entire document. The annual report is inquiries concerning reproduction should be Facsimile (08) 9474 4420 presented in PDF format. All sections, except the addressed to: financial statements, are also presented in Word [email protected] Debra Read format.
  • Download the Annual Report 2019-2020

    Download the Annual Report 2019-2020

    Leading � rec�very Annual Report 2019–2020 TARONGA ANNUAL REPORT 2019–2020 A SHARED FUTURE � WILDLIFE AND PE�PLE At Taronga we believe that together we can find a better and more sustainable way for wildlife and people to share this planet. Taronga recognises that the planet’s biodiversity and ecosystems are the life support systems for our own species' health and prosperity. At no time in history has this been more evident, with drought, bushfires, climate change, global pandemics, habitat destruction, ocean acidification and many other crises threatening natural systems and our own future. Whilst we cannot tackle these challenges alone, Taronga is acting now and working to save species, sustain robust ecosystems, provide experiences and create learning opportunities so that we act together. We believe that all of us have a responsibility to protect the world’s precious wildlife, not just for us in our lifetimes, but for generations into the future. Our Zoos create experiences that delight and inspire lasting connections between people and wildlife. We aim to create conservation advocates that value wildlife, speak up for nature and take action to help create a future where both people and wildlife thrive. Our conservation breeding programs for threatened and priority wildlife help a myriad of species, with our program for 11 Legacy Species representing an increased commitment to six Australian and five Sumatran species at risk of extinction. The Koala was added as an 11th Legacy Species in 2019, to reflect increasing threats to its survival. In the last 12 months alone, Taronga partnered with 28 organisations working on the front line of conservation across 17 countries.
  • Pirra Jungku Project Species Guide

    Pirra Jungku Project Species Guide

    The Pirra Jungku Project is a collaboration between the Karajarri Rangers, Environs Kimberley Pirra Jungku Project and the Threatened Species Recovery Hub with funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program and the species guide Western Australian Government’s NRM Program. Reptiles * Asterix means the animal can be tricky to ID. Take a good photo, or bring it back to camp for checking, but do this as a last resort. Don’t bring back any snakes, in case they are poisonous. Dragons Upright posture (stick their heads up), have small, rough scales, each leg has 5 clawed fingers/toes. MATT FROM MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA CC BY 2.0 WIKIMEDIA COMMONS JESSSARAH MILLER LEGGE Slater’s ring-tailed dragon Central military dragon (Ctenophorus slaterii) (Ctenophorus isolepis) Rocky country. Reddish colour with black Sandy country. Very fast on ground. spots on back and dark rings on the tail. Reddish colour with white spots and stripes. JESSCHRISTOPHER MILLER WATSON CC BY SA 3.0 WIKIMEDIA COMMONS ARTHUR CHAPMAN NICOLAS RAKOTOPARE Pindan dragon Horner’s dragon Northern Pilbara tree dragon (Diporiphora pindan) (Lophognathus horneri) (Diporiphora vescus) Thin, slender body. Two long white stripes Ta-ta lizard. White stripe from lip to back legs. Lives in spinifex. Plain colour, sometimes down back that cross over black and orange Tiny white spot in ear. with orange tail, and long white and grey tiger stripes.* stripes down body.* CHRISTOPHERSARAH LEGGE WATSON CC BY SA 3.0 WIKIMEDIA COMMONS Dwarf bearded dragon (Pogona minor) Grey with flat body with spiny edges. Has small spines on either side of the jaw and on the back of the head.
  • An Investigation of the Evolution of Australian Elapid Snake Venoms

    An Investigation of the Evolution of Australian Elapid Snake Venoms

    toxins Article Rapid Radiations and the Race to Redundancy: An Investigation of the Evolution of Australian Elapid Snake Venoms Timothy N. W. Jackson 1, Ivan Koludarov 1, Syed A. Ali 1,2, James Dobson 1, Christina N. Zdenek 1, Daniel Dashevsky 1, Bianca op den Brouw 1, Paul P. Masci 3, Amanda Nouwens 4, Peter Josh 4, Jonathan Goldenberg 1, Vittoria Cipriani 1, Chris Hay 1, Iwan Hendrikx 1, Nathan Dunstan 5, Luke Allen 5 and Bryan G. Fry 1,* 1 Venom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (T.N.W.J.); [email protected] (I.K.); [email protected] (S.A.A.); [email protected] (J.D.); [email protected] (C.N.Z.); [email protected] (D.D.); [email protected] (B.o.d.B.); [email protected] (J.G.); [email protected] (V.C.); [email protected] (C.H.); [email protected] (I.H.) 2 HEJ Research Institute of Chemistry, International Centre for Chemical and Biological Sciences (ICCBS), University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan 3 Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] 4 School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (A.N.); [email protected] (P.J.) 5 Venom Supplies, Tanunda, South Australia 5352, Australia; [email protected] (N.D.); [email protected] (L.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-4-0019-3182 Academic Editor: Nicholas R.
  • NATURE TERRITORY April 2019 Newsletter of the Northern Territory Field Naturalists' Club Inc

    NATURE TERRITORY April 2019 Newsletter of the Northern Territory Field Naturalists' Club Inc

    NATURE TERRITORY April 2019 Newsletter of the Northern Territory Field Naturalists' Club Inc. In This Issue April Meeting p. 2 April Field Trip p. 3 Upcoming Activities p. 3 Death Adders pp. 4-5 Publications p. 5 Podcasts pp. 6-7 Chitter Chatter pp. 8-9 Club notices p. 10 Club web-site: http://ntfieldnaturalists.org.au/ Black-ringed Mangrove Snake (Hydrelaps darwiniensis) swimming around mangroves in Darwin Harbour. Photo: Nick Volpe FOR THE DIARY April Meeting: Wednesday 10 - Oysters going troppo ? research behind the recent success presented by Samantha Nowlands April Field Trip: Sunday 14 - Butterflies at East Point with Tissa Ratnayeke See pages 2 - 3 for m ore det ails Disclaimer: The views expressed in Nature Territory are not necessarily those of the NT Field Naturalists' Club Inc. or members of its Committee. April Meeting Oysters going troppo ? research behind the recent success presented by Samantha Nowland Wednesday 10, 7.45 pm, CDU Casuarina, Room BLUE 2.2.24 Sum m ary: Darwin Aquaculture Centre's (DAC) Black-lip Oyster hatchery research program and work with Aboriginal communities in South Goulburn Island has received a lot of media coverage in recent years, and it isn't stopping any time soon. DAC's collaboration with Traditional Owners in the Warruwi community on South Goulburn Island was showcased nationally this weekend on ABC's Landline program (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-30/native-oysters:-the-beginning-of-a-new-industry-in/10956306). The DAC team has worked extremely hard to get this program to where it is today.
  • Numbat (Myrmecobius Fasciatus) Recovery Plan

    Numbat (Myrmecobius Fasciatus) Recovery Plan

    Numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) Recovery Plan Wildlife Management Program No. 60 Western Australia Department of Parks and Wildlife February 2017 Wildlife Management Program No. 60 Numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) Recovery Plan February 2017 Western Australia Department of Parks and Wildlife Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983 Foreword Recovery plans are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Parks and Wildlife Corporate Policy Statement No. 35; Conserving Threatened and Ecological Communities (DPaW 2015a), Corporate Guidelines No. 35; Listing and Recovering Threatened Species and Ecological Communities (DPaW 2015b), and the Australian Government Department of the Environment’s Recovery Planning Compliance Checklist for Legislative and Process Requirements (Department of the Environment 2014). Recovery plans outline the recovery actions that are needed to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. Recovery plans are a partnership between the Department of the Environment and Energy and the Department of Parks and Wildlife. The Department of Parks and Wildlife acknowledges the role of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and the Department of the Environment and Energy in guiding the implementation of this recovery plan. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds necessary to implement actions are subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. This recovery plan was approved by the Department of Parks and Wildlife, Western Australia. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in status of the taxon or ecological community, and the completion of recovery actions.
  • A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT

    A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT

    supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction
  • Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O

    Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O

    1 CATALOGUE OF PROTOZOAN PARASITES RECORDED IN AUSTRALIA PETER J. O’DONOGHUE & ROBERT D. ADLARD O’Donoghue, P.J. & Adlard, R.D. 2000 02 29: Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45(1):1-164. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Published reports of protozoan species from Australian animals have been compiled into a host- parasite checklist, a parasite-host checklist and a cross-referenced bibliography. Protozoa listed include parasites, commensals and symbionts but free-living species have been excluded. Over 590 protozoan species are listed including amoebae, flagellates, ciliates and ‘sporozoa’ (the latter comprising apicomplexans, microsporans, myxozoans, haplosporidians and paramyxeans). Organisms are recorded in association with some 520 hosts including mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. Information has been abstracted from over 1,270 scientific publications predating 1999 and all records include taxonomic authorities, synonyms, common names, sites of infection within hosts and geographic locations. Protozoa, parasite checklist, host checklist, bibliography, Australia. Peter J. O’Donoghue, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; Robert D. Adlard, Protozoa Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia; 31 January 2000. CONTENTS the literature for reports relevant to contemporary studies. Such problems could be avoided if all previous HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST 5 records were consolidated into a single database. Most Mammals 5 researchers currently avail themselves of various Reptiles 21 electronic database and abstracting services but none Amphibians 26 include literature published earlier than 1985 and not all Birds 34 journal titles are covered in their databases. Fish 44 Invertebrates 54 Several catalogues of parasites in Australian PARASITE-HOST CHECKLIST 63 hosts have previously been published.