DOCSLIB.ORG

New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis (Parts A & B) Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives – September 2014 New cover State Project Numbers 16317 and 68067-A New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis (Parts A & B) Task 7: Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives – September 2014 Table of Contents Project Purpose and Need Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Task Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Definition of Intermediate Alternatives ................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Expanded Base .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Bus on Shoulder ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Expanded Bus on Shoulder ........................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Manchester Regional Commuter Rail ........................................................................................... 4 1.5 Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail ............................................................................................... 10 1.6 Intercity 8 .................................................................................................................................... 14 Index A: Proposed Bus Service Option Timetables ..................................................................................... 21 Index B: Proposed Commuter Rail Service Option Timetables ................................................................... 24 Index C: Proposed Intercity Rail Service Option Timetable ........................................................................ 26 2 Application of Selection Criteria ......................................................................................................... 27 2.1 Economic Impacts ....................................................................................................................... 27 2.2 Land Use and Economic Development ....................................................................................... 31 2.2.1 Sustainable Land Use .......................................................................................................... 32 2.3 Equity Impacts ............................................................................................................................. 33 2.4 Capital and O&M Costs ............................................................................................................... 35 2.4.1 Capital Costs ........................................................................................................................ 35 2.4.2 Summary of Estimated Bus Costs ....................................................................................... 36 2.4.3 Final Estimates of Capital Costs .......................................................................................... 37 2.4.4 O&M Costs .......................................................................................................................... 38 2.4.5 Commuter Rail – Manchester Regional and Nashua Minimum.......................................... 38 2.4.6 Intercity Rail ........................................................................................................................ 38 2.4.7 Commuter Bus .................................................................................................................... 38 2.4.8 Summary of Final Estimates of Annual O&M Costs ............................................................ 38 2.5 Ridership ..................................................................................................................................... 39 State Project Numbers 16317 and 68067-A i | P a g e New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis (Parts A & B) Task 7: Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives – September 2014 List of Appendices Appendix A Economic Development Assessment Appendix B Sustainable Land Use Appendix C Equity Analysis Appendix D Final Capital Costs Methodology and Results Appendix E Final Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Methodology and Results Appendix F Rail Ridership Forecast Methodology and Results List of Tables Table 1.1: Summary of Intermediate Alternatives........................................................................................ 2 Table 1.2: Manchester Regional Commuter Rail Bridge Inventory .............................................................. 8 Table 1.3: Manchester Regional Commuter Rail Grade Crossings ............................................................... 9 Table 1.4: Manchester Regional Commuter Rail Passenger Station Development Plan ............................ 10 Table 1.5: Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail Bridge Inventory .................................................................. 13 Table 1.6: Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail Grade Crossings ................................................................... 13 Table 1.7: Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail Passenger Station Development Plan ................................. 14 Table 1.8: Intercity 8 Timetable .................................................................................................................. 15 Table 1.9: Intercity 8 Bridge Inventory ....................................................................................................... 18 Table 1.10: Intercity 8 Grade Crossings ...................................................................................................... 19 Table 1.11: Intercity 8 Passenger Station Development Plan ..................................................................... 20 Table A.1: Proposed Expanded Base Timetable ......................................................................................... 21 Table A.2: Proposed Bus on Shoulder Timetable ........................................................................................ 22 Table A.3: Proposed Expanded Bus on Shoulder Timetable ....................................................................... 23 Table B 1: Conceptual Manchester Regional Commuter Rail Timetable .................................................... 24 Table B.2: Conceptual Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail Timetable ......................................................... 25 Table C.1: Conceptual Intercity 8 Timetable ............................................................................................... 26 Table 2.1: Total Station Area Development Potential by Alternative ......................................................... 28 Table 2.2: Commuter Rail Development Potential in Each Station Area .................................................... 29 Table 2.3: Intercity Rail Development Potential in Each Station Area ........................................................ 29 Table 2.4: Impacts on Employment (Jobs) by Alternative .......................................................................... 30 Table 2.5: Impacts on Output (Gross Regional Product) by Alternative (In Millions, 2014$) ..................... 31 Table 2.6: Summary of Goals by Alternative............................................................................................... 32 Table 2.7: Summary of Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 34 Table 2.8: Summary of Project Capital Costs (In Millions, 2014$) .............................................................. 35 Table 2.9: BX Vehicle Requirements by Service Option .............................................................................. 36 Table 2.10: Final Capital Cost Estimates for Bus Options (In Millions, 2014$) ........................................... 37 Table 2.11: Final Estimates of Capital Cost (In Millions, 2014$) ................................................................. 37 State Project Numbers 16317 and 68067-A ii | P a g e New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis (Parts A & B) Task 7: Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives – September 2014 Table 2.12: Final Estimates of Annual O&M Costs (In Millions, 2012$) ..................................................... 39 Table 2.13: Manchester Regional Daily Boarding Estimates ...................................................................... 39 Table 2.14: Nashua Minimum Daily Boarding Estimates ............................................................................ 39 Table 2.15: Daily Ridership Estimates ......................................................................................................... 39 List of Figures Figure 1.1: Existing Corridor Bus and Existing Rail Services .......................................................................... 3 Figure 1.2: Proposed Manchester Regional Commuter Rail and Bus Service Configuration ....................... 5 Figure 1.3: Time-Distance Stringline Diagram for Manchester Regional Commuter Rail Service ................ 6 Figure 1.4: Current and Proposed Maximum Train Speeds for Manchester Regional Commuter Rail ........ 7 Figure 1.5: Proposed Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail and Bus Service Configuration ..........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boston Produced in 2012
    BioMap2 CONSERVING THE BIODIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS IN A CHANGING WORLD Boston Produced in 2012 This report and associated map provide information about important sites for biodiversity conservation in your area. This information is intended for conservation planning, and is not intended for use in state regulations. BioMap2 Conserving the Biodiversity of Massachusetts in a Changing World Table of Contents Introduction What is BioMap2 – Purpose and applications One plan, two components Understanding Core Habitat and its components Understanding Critical Natural Landscape and its components Understanding Core Habitat and Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Sources of Additional Information Boston Overview Core Habitat and Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Elements of BioMap2 Cores Core Habitat Summaries Elements of BioMap2 Critical Natural Landscapes Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Natural Heritage Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife 1 Rabbit Hill Road, Westborough, MA 01581 & Endangered phone: 508‐389‐6360 fax: 508‐389‐7890 Species Program For more information on rare species and natural communities, please see our fact sheets online at www.mass.gov/nhesp. BioMap2 Conserving the Biodiversity of Massachusetts in a Changing World Introduction The Massachusetts Department of Fish & Game, through the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), and The Nature Conservancy’s Massachusetts Program developed BioMap2 to protect the state’s biodiversity in the context of climate change. BioMap2 combines NHESP’s 30 years of rigorously documented rare species and natural community data with spatial data identifying wildlife species and habitats that were the focus of the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s 2005 State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP).
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining MBTA Commuter Rail Ridership METHODS RIDERSHIP
    TAKING THE TRAIN? Explaining MBTA Commuter Rail Ridership INTRODUCTION RIDERSHIP BY STATION RESULTS The MBTA Commuter Rail provides service from suburbs in the Boston Metro Area to Boston area stations, with terminal Commuter Rail Variables stations at North Station and South Station. While using commuter rail may be faster, particularly at rush hour, than using a Distance to Boston, distance to rapid transit, price of commuter rail, commuter rail time, transit time, and drive time are all personal vehicle or other transit alternatives, people still choose not to use the Commuter Rail, as can be demonstrated by the highly correlated. This makes sense as they all essentially measure distance to Boston in dollars, minutes and miles. high volume of people driving at rush hour. For the commuter rail variables analysis, trains per weekday (standardized beta=.536, p=.000), drive time at 8AM This study seeks to understand the personal vehicle and public transit alternatives to the MBTA Commuter Rail at each stop (standardized beta=.385, p=.000), peak on time performance (standardized beta=-.206, p=.009) and the terminal station to understand what options people have when deciding to use the Commuter Rail over another mode and what characteristics (p=.001) were found to be significant. Interestingly, all variables calculated for the area a half mile from commuter rail sta- tions (population, jobs and median income) were not significant. of the alternatives may inspire people to choose them over Commuter Rail. Understanding what transit and driving alterna- tives are like at each Commuter Rail stop may offer insight into why people are choosing or not choosing Commuter Rail for Transit Variables their trips to Boston, and how to encourage ridership.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston to Providence Commuter Rail Schedule
    Boston To Providence Commuter Rail Schedule Giacomo beseechings downward. Dimitrou shrieved her convert dolce, she detach it prenatally. Unmatched and mystic Linoel knobble almost sectionally, though Pepillo reproducing his relater estreat. Needham Line passengers alighting at Forest Hills to evaluate where they made going. Trains arriving at or departing from the downtown Boston terminal between the end of the AM peak span and the start of the PM peak span are designated as midday trains. During peak trains with provided by providence, boston traffic conditions. Produced by WBUR and NPR. Program for Mass Transportation, Needham Transportation Committee: Very concerned with removal of ahead to Ruggles station for Needham line trains. Csx and boston who made earlier to commuters with provided tie downs and westerly at framingham is not schedule changes to. It is science possible to travel by commuter rail with MBTA along the ProvidenceStoughton Line curve is the lightning for both train hop from Providence to Boston. Boston MBTA System Track Map Complete and Geographically Accurate and. Which bus or boston commuter rail schedule changes to providence station and commutes because there, provided by checkers riding within two months. Read your favorite comics from Comics Kingdom. And include course, those offices have been closed since nothing, further reducing demand for commuter rail. No lines feed into both the North and South Stations. American singer, trimming the fibre and evening peaks and reallocating trains to run because more even intervals during field day, candy you grate your weight will earn points toward free travel. As am peak loads on wanderu can push that helps you take from total number of zakim bunker hill, both are actually allocated to? MBTA Providence Commuter Train The MBTA Commuter Rail trains run between Boston and Providence on time schedule biased for extra working in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Station Parking
    Parking at/near the Passenger Rail Stations used by Residents of Western Mass. Parking rate per Distance Cost to Park Station Location Long‐term Parking Location Hour Day Month from Station for 1 Day North – South stations $ 5 / day GREENFIELD surface lot (city owned) 0.2 miles $ 0.75 / hour $ 5 $ 25 / for 7 days NA Amtrak Hope Street (4 min walk) (maximum of 10 hours) (see note 1) NORTHAMPTON E. John Gare Parking Garage (city owned) 0.3 miles Free / first hour $ 90 / month $ 12 NA Amtrak 85 Hampton Avenue (6 min walk) $ 0.50 / each additional hour (see note 2) HOLYOKE surface lot at station (state owned) ‐‐ Free Free Amtrak 74 Main Street $ 1.50 for the first 30 minutes $ 2.00 per each additional hour Union Station Garage (city owned) $ 5 $ 5 Daily Commuter (5 am — Midnight) SPRINGFIELD ‐‐ $ 65 / month 1755 Main Street (5 am ‐ Midnight) $ 20 / 24 hours Amtrak $ 40 / 48 hours Ctrail $ 50 / 3–7 days Greyhound Peter Pan $ 10 / day (1–3 calendar days) Ken's Parking (private surface lot) 0.1 miles $ 10 NA $ 8 / day (4–6 calendar days) NA 73 Taylor Street (2 min walk) $ 6 / day (7+ calendar days) WINDSOR LOCKS surface lot at station (state owned) Amtrak ‐‐ Free Free South Main Street at Stanton Road CTail Stations along the MBTA Framingham / Worcester Line $ 3 / 0–1 hour $ 1 / each additional hour $ 116 – Regular Monthly Union Station Garage (city owned) $ 12 $ 12 / 6+ hours ‐‐ $ 127 – 24/7 225 Franklin Street $ 16 (overnight) $ 1 / evenings (5 pm – 3 am) WORCESTER $ 150 – Premium MBTA Commuter Rail $ 5 / overnight (3 am – 4 am) Amtrak Note | day begins at 4 am surface lot (city owned) 0.1 miles $ 4 $ 4 / day NA NA 25 Shewsbury Street (2 min walk) GRAFTON surface lot at station (state owned) ‐‐ $ 4 $ 4 / day NA NA MBTA Commuter Rail 1 Pine Street, North Grafton Note 1 | Daily/weekly Amtrak Parking passes must be purchased in advance (at Greenfield City Hall or on the web) Note 2 | There is currently a waiting list for monthly parking permits at this location Prepared by Trains In The Valley 8/15/2018.
    [Show full text]
  • 495/Metrowest Profile Prepared for the 495/Metrowest Suburban Edge Community Commission
    495/MetroWest Profile Prepared for the 495/MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission 495/MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission The 495/ MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission was established by the Legislature in Section 233 of Chapter 119 of the Session Laws of 2015. The commission will study development challenges experienced by edge communities, including transportation, water, cellular, and energy infrastructure, transit services, residential development, reuse of former industrial facilities and historic mills, brownfields reclamation, downtown redevelopment and other such constraints. The commission will then develop policy responses and recommendations to ensure that edge communities can participate in state development initiatives and benefit from state resources. The commission will focus its investigation and study on the 35 municipalities served by the 495/MetroWest Corridor Partnership, Inc. and develop a pilot program to address the issues to be studied and investigated by the commission. Our Mission The mission of the Public Policy Center (PPC) at UMass Dartmouth is to: Inform evidence-based policy making. Improve public understanding of critical policy issues. Provide educational and research opportunities to our faculty and students. Connect the resources of the University of Massachusetts to the communities we serve. The PPC's primary goal is to inform public policy discussions by providing policy makers with university quality research, technical assistance, and analytical services designed to help make our state, region, and communities better places to live, work, and do business. We do this by leveraging the substantial skills of our students and faculty partners, and enhancing the connections between the University and the communities it serves. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 The 495/MetroWest Region ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Official Transportation Map 15 HAZARDOUS CARGO All Hazardous Cargo (HC) and Cargo Tankers General Information Throughout Boston and Surrounding Towns
    WELCOME TO MASSACHUSETTS! CONTACT INFORMATION REGIONAL TOURISM COUNCILS STATE ROAD LAWS NONRESIDENT PRIVILEGES Massachusetts grants the same privileges EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE Fire, Police, Ambulance: 911 16 to nonresidents as to Massachusetts residents. On behalf of the Commonwealth, MBTA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 2 welcome to Massachusetts. In our MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10 SPEED LAW Observe posted speed limits. The runs daily service on buses, trains, trolleys and ferries 14 3 great state, you can enjoy the rolling Official Transportation Map 15 HAZARDOUS CARGO All hazardous cargo (HC) and cargo tankers General Information throughout Boston and surrounding towns. Stations can be identified 13 hills of the west and in under three by a black on a white, circular sign. Pay your fare with a 9 1 are prohibited from the Boston Tunnels. hours travel east to visit our pristine MassDOT Headquarters 857-368-4636 11 reusable, rechargeable CharlieCard (plastic) or CharlieTicket 12 DRUNK DRIVING LAWS Massachusetts enforces these laws rigorously. beaches. You will find a state full (toll free) 877-623-6846 (paper) that can be purchased at over 500 fare-vending machines 1. Greater Boston 9. MetroWest 4 MOBILE ELECTRONIC DEVICE LAWS Operators cannot use any of history and rich in diversity that (TTY) 857-368-0655 located at all subway stations and Logan airport terminals. At street- 2. North of Boston 10. Johnny Appleseed Trail 5 3. Greater Merrimack Valley 11. Central Massachusetts mobile electronic device to write, send, or read an electronic opens its doors to millions of visitors www.mass.gov/massdot level stations and local bus stops you pay on board.
    [Show full text]
  • Roxbury-Dorchester-Mattapan Transit Needs Study
    Roxbury-Dorchester-Mattapan Transit Needs Study SEPTEMBER 2012 The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration [and Federal Transit Administration], U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors [or agency] expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U. S. Department of Transportation. i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 I. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 A Lack of Trust .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 The Loss of Rapid Transit Service .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of U.S. Commuter Rail
    AN OVERVIEW OF U.S. COMMUTER RAIL Timothy J. Brock, MA Reginald R. Souleyrette, PhD, PE KTC-13-18/UTCNURAIL1-12-1F This research was sponsored by: The NuRail Center National University Transportation Center and The Kentucky Transportation Center University of Kentucky Cover Photo: Tri-Rail System in Miami, Florida By: Timothy J. Brock Date: April, 2011 Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Dr. Ted Grossardt and Dr. Len O’Connell for their comments on earlier drafts. They would also like to thank the participants in the Cities, Transportation and Sustainability session at the Association of American Geographers annual meeting for the thoughtful discussion and comments on this research. Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Kentucky Transportation Center or of the NuRail Center. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. ii AN OVERVIEW OF U.S. COMMUTER RAIL Timothy J. Brock, M.A. Research Associate Kentucky Transportation Center University of Kentucky and Reginald R. Souleyrette, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Transportation Engineering and Commonwealth Chair College of Engineering University of Kentucky FINAL REPORT May 2nd, 2013 © 2013 University of Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Center Information may not be used, reproduced, or republished without our written consent. iii 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No KTC-13-18/UTCNURAIL1-12-1F 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date May 2013 AN OVERVIEW OF U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN for the Greater Nashua and Milford Region
    LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region Locally Coordinated Transportation Plan For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region 2020-2024 Adopted: April 15, 2020 LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Community Input Participants Bridges: Domestic & Sexual Violence Support Servicelink City of Nashua Welfare/Human Services Department Souhegan Valley Transportation Collaborative Front Door Agency Southern NH HIV/AIDS Task Force Gentle Car Rides, LLC Southern NH Services Granite State Independent Living St. John Neumann Day Away Harbor Homes, Inc St. Joseph’s Community Services, Inc. Interested Public Toward Independent Living and Learning, Inc. Keystone Hall Town of Amherst Welfare/Human Services Department Milford Taxi Town of Brookline Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Center Town of Hollis Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Soup Kitchen & Shelter, Inc. Town of Hudson Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Transit System Town of Litchfield Welfare/Human Services Department Opportunity Networks Town of Mason Welfare/Human Services Department Partnership for Successful Living Town of Merrimack Welfare/Human Services Department Pelham Senior Center Town of Milford Welfare/Human Services Department PLUS Company, Inc. Town of Pelham Welfare/Human Services Department SHARE Outreach Town of Wilton Welfare/Human Services Department Steering Committee Nashua Regional Planning Commission Steve Genest, Southern New Hampshire Services Jay
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSIT Introduction Transit Service
    Transit TRANSIT Introduction Montachusett Regional Transit Authority (MART) provides a variety of transportation services for residents of the Montachusett Region and other areas throughout the Commonwealth. The communities served by MART have grown steadily over the years. Initially comprised of Fitchburg, Gardner, Leominster and their immediate neighbors, MART now serves 22 communities in and out of the MRPC region. In 2013, the town of Athol formally became a member of MART’s Twenty-two communities in the region utilize MART services. Member communities are Fitchburg, Leominster, Gardner, Ashburnham, Shirley, Ayer, Lancaster, Sterling, Hubbardston, Royalston, Littleton, Winchendon, Ashby, Templeton, Westminster, Hardwick, Lunenburg, Harvard, Bolton, Boxborough, Stow and Athol. Fixed route bus services, paratransit and subscription services are operated by a private management company, namely, Management of Transportation Services, Inc. All other transportation is operated by a variety of private vendors in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) is responsible for commuter rail services from Fitchburg to Boston. Transit Service Fixed Route The backbone of the region’s public transportation system is the local transit bus service. Local fixed route bus service operates along set routes and follows set schedules. Local Bus service is available in the three cities of Fitchburg, Leominster and Gardner and limited sections of Lunenburg and Lancaster. Sixteen (16) bus routes are provided by MART, eleven (11) in Fitchburg and Leominster, four (4) in Gardner and one (1) intercity route between the three cities. Service operates Monday through Saturday (except for the G-Link and Intercity routes which run Monday to Friday). Three (3) peak services routes also run Monday thru Friday in Fitchburg during the school year.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Systemwide Context of The
    CHAPTER 4 Systemwide Context for the PMT TRANSIT SYSTEM: EXISTING CONDITIONS OVERVIEW The Boston metropolitan area is served by an extensive transit system comprising several comple- mentary components. One component is a hub-and-spoke radial network of rapid transit, express bus, commuter rail, and commuter boat lines that is geared, during peak operations, to efficiently move large volumes of people into and out of the urban core for weekday commutes. Local bus and trackless trolley services fill in gaps and connect the radial “spokes” by offering line haul service in heavily congested urban areas, feeder service to rail, and some inter-suburban linkages. Demand- responsive transportation for people with disabilities and the elderly is also provided. The MBTA is the primary transit provider in the Boston region. The MBTA district is made up of 175 cities and towns and includes communities outside of the 101 municipalities of the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization area. The MBTA also provides commuter rail service to Provi- dence, Rhode Island, which lies outside the MBTA district. As can be seen in the following table, almost 99% of daily boardings are on the MBTA’s primary modes: rapid transit (heavy rail and light rail), bus rapid transit (BRT), bus/trackless trolley, and commuter rail. SY S TEMWIDE CONTEXT FOR THE PMT 4-1 TABLE 4-1 operating between Wonderland Station in Re- Typical Weekday Boardings by Mode vere and Bowdoin Station in the Government (Federal Fiscal Year 2007) Center area of Boston. MODE BOARDINGS • Green Line: A 23-mile light rail line over four Rapid transit 730,525 branches: Boston College (B Line), Cleveland Bus (including trackless 355,558 Circle (C Line), Riverside (D Line), and Heath trolley and BRT) Street (E Line).
    [Show full text]
  • Rhode Island Rapid Rail
    RHODE ISLAND RAPID RAIL A Strategy for Economic Growth Concept Paper March 2019 Grow Smart RI Board of Directors Gail E. McCann Wilfrid L. Gates Board Chair Michael S. Hudner Stanley J. Kanter Lloyd Albert Michael F. Ryan William Baldwin Deming E. Sherman Daniel A. Baudouin W. Edward Wood Samuel J. Bradner Kenneth Burnett John Chambers Acknowledgements Sharon D. Conard-Wells Gib Conover Grow Smart RI thanks its pro-bono planning Trudy Coxe and transportation consultants Roger Leaf of Michael A. DeCataldo New York City and Peter Brassard of Dennis DiPrete Newport, RI and New York City for their Maia Farish leadership in concept development, analysis Travis Escobar and research that made this proposal Michael L. Friedman possible. Glenn Gardiner Brian Goldberg Cover images and graphic concepts courtesy Karen Grande of Roger Williams University student intern Dr. William H. Hollinshead Karita N. Lipdo. Jason E. Kelly Xaykham Khamsyvoravong Howard M. Kilguss Purpose Jane S. Long This paper is being submitted to RIPTA and Pat Moran its planning consultants for consideration Jay O'Grady and evaluation as part of Rhode Island’s first- Taino Palermo ever Transit Master Planning process now Donald W. Powers underway. Lucie G. Searle Pamela M. Sherrill Julia Anne M. Slom Grow Smart RI Joseph T. Wanat 1 Empire St, Suite 523 George Watson III Providence, RI 02903 Martha L. Werenfels 401-273-5711 Nancy Parker Wilson www.GrowSmartRI.org Directors Emeritus Arnold "Buff" Chace Louise Durfee, Esq. Grow Smart RI 1 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2 Rethinking mobility in RI ..................................................................................... 2 Rhode Island Rapid Rail........................................................................................ 3 Better Connecting People with Jobs .................................................................
    [Show full text]