New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis

New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis

New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis (Parts A & B) Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives – September 2014 New cover State Project Numbers 16317 and 68067-A New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis (Parts A & B) Task 7: Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives – September 2014 Table of Contents Project Purpose and Need Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Task Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Definition of Intermediate Alternatives ................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Expanded Base .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Bus on Shoulder ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Expanded Bus on Shoulder ........................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Manchester Regional Commuter Rail ........................................................................................... 4 1.5 Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail ............................................................................................... 10 1.6 Intercity 8 .................................................................................................................................... 14 Index A: Proposed Bus Service Option Timetables ..................................................................................... 21 Index B: Proposed Commuter Rail Service Option Timetables ................................................................... 24 Index C: Proposed Intercity Rail Service Option Timetable ........................................................................ 26 2 Application of Selection Criteria ......................................................................................................... 27 2.1 Economic Impacts ....................................................................................................................... 27 2.2 Land Use and Economic Development ....................................................................................... 31 2.2.1 Sustainable Land Use .......................................................................................................... 32 2.3 Equity Impacts ............................................................................................................................. 33 2.4 Capital and O&M Costs ............................................................................................................... 35 2.4.1 Capital Costs ........................................................................................................................ 35 2.4.2 Summary of Estimated Bus Costs ....................................................................................... 36 2.4.3 Final Estimates of Capital Costs .......................................................................................... 37 2.4.4 O&M Costs .......................................................................................................................... 38 2.4.5 Commuter Rail – Manchester Regional and Nashua Minimum.......................................... 38 2.4.6 Intercity Rail ........................................................................................................................ 38 2.4.7 Commuter Bus .................................................................................................................... 38 2.4.8 Summary of Final Estimates of Annual O&M Costs ............................................................ 38 2.5 Ridership ..................................................................................................................................... 39 State Project Numbers 16317 and 68067-A i | P a g e New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis (Parts A & B) Task 7: Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives – September 2014 List of Appendices Appendix A Economic Development Assessment Appendix B Sustainable Land Use Appendix C Equity Analysis Appendix D Final Capital Costs Methodology and Results Appendix E Final Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Methodology and Results Appendix F Rail Ridership Forecast Methodology and Results List of Tables Table 1.1: Summary of Intermediate Alternatives........................................................................................ 2 Table 1.2: Manchester Regional Commuter Rail Bridge Inventory .............................................................. 8 Table 1.3: Manchester Regional Commuter Rail Grade Crossings ............................................................... 9 Table 1.4: Manchester Regional Commuter Rail Passenger Station Development Plan ............................ 10 Table 1.5: Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail Bridge Inventory .................................................................. 13 Table 1.6: Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail Grade Crossings ................................................................... 13 Table 1.7: Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail Passenger Station Development Plan ................................. 14 Table 1.8: Intercity 8 Timetable .................................................................................................................. 15 Table 1.9: Intercity 8 Bridge Inventory ....................................................................................................... 18 Table 1.10: Intercity 8 Grade Crossings ...................................................................................................... 19 Table 1.11: Intercity 8 Passenger Station Development Plan ..................................................................... 20 Table A.1: Proposed Expanded Base Timetable ......................................................................................... 21 Table A.2: Proposed Bus on Shoulder Timetable ........................................................................................ 22 Table A.3: Proposed Expanded Bus on Shoulder Timetable ....................................................................... 23 Table B 1: Conceptual Manchester Regional Commuter Rail Timetable .................................................... 24 Table B.2: Conceptual Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail Timetable ......................................................... 25 Table C.1: Conceptual Intercity 8 Timetable ............................................................................................... 26 Table 2.1: Total Station Area Development Potential by Alternative ......................................................... 28 Table 2.2: Commuter Rail Development Potential in Each Station Area .................................................... 29 Table 2.3: Intercity Rail Development Potential in Each Station Area ........................................................ 29 Table 2.4: Impacts on Employment (Jobs) by Alternative .......................................................................... 30 Table 2.5: Impacts on Output (Gross Regional Product) by Alternative (In Millions, 2014$) ..................... 31 Table 2.6: Summary of Goals by Alternative............................................................................................... 32 Table 2.7: Summary of Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 34 Table 2.8: Summary of Project Capital Costs (In Millions, 2014$) .............................................................. 35 Table 2.9: BX Vehicle Requirements by Service Option .............................................................................. 36 Table 2.10: Final Capital Cost Estimates for Bus Options (In Millions, 2014$) ........................................... 37 Table 2.11: Final Estimates of Capital Cost (In Millions, 2014$) ................................................................. 37 State Project Numbers 16317 and 68067-A ii | P a g e New Hampshire Capitol Corridor Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis (Parts A & B) Task 7: Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives – September 2014 Table 2.12: Final Estimates of Annual O&M Costs (In Millions, 2012$) ..................................................... 39 Table 2.13: Manchester Regional Daily Boarding Estimates ...................................................................... 39 Table 2.14: Nashua Minimum Daily Boarding Estimates ............................................................................ 39 Table 2.15: Daily Ridership Estimates ......................................................................................................... 39 List of Figures Figure 1.1: Existing Corridor Bus and Existing Rail Services .......................................................................... 3 Figure 1.2: Proposed Manchester Regional Commuter Rail and Bus Service Configuration ....................... 5 Figure 1.3: Time-Distance Stringline Diagram for Manchester Regional Commuter Rail Service ................ 6 Figure 1.4: Current and Proposed Maximum Train Speeds for Manchester Regional Commuter Rail ........ 7 Figure 1.5: Proposed Nashua Minimum Commuter Rail and Bus Service Configuration ..........................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    134 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us