Towards a Marine Spatial Plan for the Westfjords of Iceland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Towards a Marine Spatial Plan for the Westfjords of Iceland Master‘s thesis Towards a Marine Spatial Plan for the Westfjords of Iceland Abby Sullivan Advisor: Dr. Lorraine Gray University of Akureyri Faculty of Business and Science University Centre of the Westfjords Master of Resource Management: Coastal and Marine Management Ísafjörður, May 2011 Supervisory Committee Advisor: Lorraine Gray, Phd. Reader: Sigríður Kristjánsdóttir, Phd. Program Director: Dagný Arnarsdóttir, MSc. Abby Sullivan Towards a Marine Spatial Plan for the Westfjords of Iceland 60 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of a Master of Resource Management degree in Coastal and Marine Management at the University Centre of the Westfjords, Suðurgata 12, 400 Ísafjörður, Iceland Degree accredited by the University of Akureyri, Faculty of Business and Science, Borgir, 600 Akureyri, Iceland Copyright © 2011 Abby Sullivan All rights reserved Printing: Háskólaprent, Reykjavik, May 2011 Declaration I hereby confirm that I am the sole author of this thesis and it is a product of my own academic research. _________________________________________ Student‘s name Abstract Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) is widely recognized as being a key step to achieving ecosystem-based ocean and coastal management. It is a process that borrows tools from terrestrial planning, but that must also be adapted to address the unique challenges and qualities of the marine environment. It involves gathering spatial information in order to better visualize and understand the marine environment and to better inform management decisions that plan for the future. Recent interest sparked MSP initiatives around the world, most notably in Europe. Iceland, a country that has always depended on the sea for survival and which today still relies heavily on living marine resources, lacks an integrated management framework. To investigate which methods of MSP would be best suited for the Westfjords, this paper reviewed the current literature, compared MSP around the world in case studies, and trialled some of these methods in a small pilot area in Isafjarðardjúp (a large fjords system in the Westfjords). The results suggest that current conflicts on the water usually involve the fishing and aquaculture sector and that increased conflict in the future is expected as new technologies emerge (such as the wet renewables sector). It was established during the project that job creation, sustainable development and increasing the population are key values and objectives in the region. Information was gathered from interviews with local experts and GIS was then used to create maps to capture their knowledge on spatial use. Methods were then recommended to continue the MSP process in the Westfjords. In conclusion, MSP provides potential benefits and opportunities for reduced conflict and sustainable development through a better-informed and more efficient management regime in the Westfjords. Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................... xii List of Maps ................................................................................................. xiii Acronyms ..................................................................................................... xiv Acknowledgements..................................................................................... xvii 1 Introduction .................................................................................................1 1.1 The Need for Ecosystem-based, Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 What is Marine Spatial Planning? ....................................................................... 3 1.3 The Need for Marine Spatial Planning in Iceland .............................................. 4 1.4 Outputs of Marine Spatial Planning .................................................................... 5 1.5 Thesis Objectives and Outcomes .......................................................................... 5 1.6 Thesis Organization............................................................................................... 6 2 Theoretical Overview..................................................................................7 2.1 Literature Review .................................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................7 2.1.2 What Marine Spatial Planning Should Achieve.............................................8 2.2 Marine Spatial Planning Policy Review............................................................. 16 2.2.1 International Policy ......................................................................................16 2.2.2 Regional Policy ............................................................................................18 2.2.3 Policy in Iceland...........................................................................................19 2.3 Comparative Analysis.......................................................................................... 19 2.3.1 Choosing the Marine Spatial Planning Case Studies ...................................20 2.3.2 Marine Spatial Planning in the Shetland Islands..........................................21 2.3.3 Marine Spatial Planning in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park .................31 2.3.4 Marine Spatial Planning in the Belgium Part of the North Sea ...................38 2.3.5 Marine Spatial Planning in the Norwegian Sea ...........................................46 2.4 Technology for Marine Spatial Planning........................................................... 54 3 Research Methods .....................................................................................57 3.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 57 3.2 Determining the Pilot Study Location................................................................ 58 3.3 Determining Stakeholders and Interviewing Techniques................................ 59 3.4 Determining the Local Context and Conflicts within Isafjarðardjúp............. 59 3.5 Mapping................................................................................................................ 60 3.6 Data Scoping......................................................................................................... 60 3.6.1 Filling in the Gaps........................................................................................60 ix 4 Results - Pilot Study of Marine Spatial Planning in Isafjarðardjúp ... 61 4.1 Background and Context .................................................................................... 61 4.1.1 The Need for Marine Spatial Planning in Iceland and the Westfjords ........ 61 4.1.2 History, Heritage and Fishing in Iceland ..................................................... 61 4.1.3 Aquaculture in Iceland................................................................................. 62 4.1.4 Tourism in Iceland ....................................................................................... 63 4.1.5 Threats to the Marine Environment ............................................................. 65 4.1.6 Sector-by-sector Management in Iceland’s Ocean ...................................... 67 4.1.7 Planning in the Icelandic Marine Environment ........................................... 67 4.1.8 Planning in the ocean in the Westfjords....................................................... 68 4.2 The Ecosystem and its Users............................................................................... 68 4.2.1 Scope of the Project ..................................................................................... 69 4.2.2 Sectors and Users in Isafjarðardjúp ............................................................. 71 4.3 Issues and Conflicts ............................................................................................. 71 4.3.1 Conflict Between Users ............................................................................... 72 4.3.2 Conflicts Between Users and the Environment ........................................... 73 4.3.3 Important Sites ............................................................................................. 76 4.3.4 Additional Potential Conflicts...................................................................... 77 4.4 Mapped Uses and Elements of the Marine Environment ................................ 79 4.4.1 Discussion on Mapping................................................................................ 86 5 Conclusions and Recommendations ....................................................... 87 5.1 Recommendations................................................................................................ 88 5.1.1 Place-based Regions .................................................................................... 88 5.1.2 Establish a Lead Authority and Gauge Support........................................... 89 5.1.3 Organize Stakeholders and Develop the Process......................................... 90 5.1.4 Continued Stakeholder Involvement............................................................ 91 5.1.5 Determine Objectives, Values and Parameters............................................ 92 5.1.6 Collect and Collate Data and Spatial Information ......................................
Recommended publications
  • Stofnvöktun Lunda 2017-2019
    STOFNVÖKTUN LUNDA 2017-2019 Lokaskýrsla til Umhverfisstofnunar Árlegur stofnvöxtur lunda (λ) á Íslandi 2010-2019. Stofninn vex þegar λ > 1 og rénar þegar λ < 1, λ = 1 er sýnt með svartri láréttri línu. Veiðar eru stofnvistfræðilega ósjálfbærar þegar þegar λ < 1. Geometrískt meðaltal λ árin 2010-2019 er 0,96478, eða -2,73% fækkun á ári. Reiknuð fækkun með þessu meðaltali árabilið 2003-2019 er - 43,7%. Litir sýna þá IUCN flokka sem viðkomandi stofnvöxtur raðast á hverju ári: rauður; Í bráðri hættu – Critically Endangered; appelsínugulur; Í hættu – Endangered; gulur; Í nokkurri hættu – Vulnerable; grænn; Ekki í hættu – Least Concern. Erpur Snær Hansen 15. desember 2019 Náttúrustofa Suðurlands Stofnvöktun lunda á Íslandi 2017-2019 SAMANTEKT Lundi er algengastur og einna mest veiddur íslenskra fugla. Næstum allur lundi er nú veiddur í háf á varptíma og varð háfaveiði ríkjandi veiðiaðferð í Vestmannaeyjum um 1880 [1]. Þar hefur veiðimagn verið tengt sjávarhita frá 1880 [2]. Skiptast á hlý- og köld tímabil sem vara í um 35 ár (svonefnd AMO sveifla), og hefur veiði hnignað á hlýskeiðunum en aukist á kaldskeiðum. Núverandi hlýskeið hófst 1996 og hefur lundaveiði á landsvísu dregist saman um 90% 1995-2018, en samdrátturinn 1995-2007 nemur 73 prósentustigum, þ.e. áður en dregið var úr sókn. Líklegt er að lækkuð viðkoma á landsvísu skýri að mestu þennan samdrátt í veiðum, sem aftur endurspeglar neikvæð áhrif hitabreytinga og hugsanlega fleiri umhverfisþátta á aðalfæðutegundir lunda hérlendis, sandsíli og loðnu. Árlegur stofnvöxtur (λ) Íslenska lundastofnsins á landsvísu árabilið 2010-2019 var að meðaltali 0,96478 sem er undir stofnvistfræðilegum sjálfbærnimörkum (λ = 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Your Cruise Icelandic Nature and Traditions
    Icelandic nature and traditions From 8/11/2021 From Reykjavík Ship: LE DUMONT-D'URVILLE to 8/22/2021 to Reykjavík Discover the most beautiful landscapes on the Icelandic west coast during an 12-day PONANT cruise. On the edge of the Arctic, between vast glaciers, vertiginous fjords, volcanoes and boiling geysers, thiscircumnavigation will enable you to discover the wild and romantic landscapes of Iceland. Departing from Reykjavík, you will set off aboardLe Dumont-d’Urville, heading for Heimaey, the only inhabited island in the Westman archipelago. It is an exceptional place composed of volcanoes and almost- desert landscapes, where fishing is the main food source. You will then set sail for the bay ofGrundarfjörður , right near Kirkjufell. This stunning cone-shaped mountain possesses a unique charm and this will be an opportunity to take some beautiful photos. After visiting the villages ofÍsafjörður and Djúpavík, you will head for Siglurfjörður, to the north of Tröllaskagithe peninsula, whose mountainous silhouettes are reminiscent of French alpine reliefs. Founded in the 10th century, this small port reputed for herring fishing is also known for the beauty of its fjord. Le Dumont-d’Urville will sail for Grímsey, a small, hard-to-reach island where, in certain places, the volcanic rock forms magnificent basalt columns. Sea birds reign here. Akureyri, the capital of north Iceland, will welcome you on the shores of the Eyafjörður fjord, very close to the Arctic Circle. Your ship will then head south again toHornafjörður , in the Vatnajökull National Park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. You will be dazzled by the beauty of the landscapes around the Jökulsarlon glacial lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumpolar Murre Conservation Strategy
    Circumpolar Murre Conservation Strategy IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2004–2008 – ICELAND Aevar Petersen NÍ-03006 Reykjavík, January 2003 NÁTTÚRUFRÆÐISTOFNUN ÍSLANDS ISSN 1670-0120 2 ICELANDIC I NSTITUTE OF N ATURAL H ISTORY 2003 CMCS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2004–2008–ICELAND SUMMARY The International Murre Conservation Strategy and Action Plan (CMCS) was finalised in 1996 by the Circumpolar Seabird Group (CBird) on behalf of the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna Working Group (CAFF 1996). Prior to that and since, the CAFF countries have been implementing various aspects of the strategy most relevant to them. Iceland has worked on several aspects of the strategy, although a consorted plan has not been developed until now. The strategy covers the two murre species, Common Murre Uria aalge and Thick- billed Murre U. lomvia . An overview of the present status of various strategy actions is given. Also presented are various suggestions for actions to implement the different strategy items in future years. Guidelines are provided in the CMCS on how to implement the strategy. These fall under three headings, i.e. Priorities, Collaboration and Cooperation, and Reporting. The most important initial recommendations for future work are collected under each heading, including some general recommendations, which are important for full implementation of the strategy. Many aspects of murre management and conservation need further work in Iceland, both research and compilations of status. These include, among others, harvesting and tourism practices at colonies, distribution of murres at sea, effects of incidental takes in fishing gear, monitoring of a representative set of breeding colonies, effect of winter hunting on Thick- billed Murres, murre banding, and production of educational materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Í Blaðinu Upplýsingablað Fyrir Ferðafólk Á Leið Um Vestfirði
    Ókeypis eintak www.westfjords.is 1 Vestfirðir sumarið 2011 er Í blaðinu upplýsingablað fyrir ferðafólk á leið um Vestfirði. Blaðið kemur nú út sautjánda sumarið í röð og liggur að venju frammi án kki missa af ævintýrunum aftast í blaðinu, þar sem er áttúran er ekki það eina sem heillar ferðamenn endurgjalds á viðkomustöðum Eað finna ótal uppástungur að skemmtilegum uppá­ Ná Vest fjörðum. Á svæðinu er aragrúi safna og ferðafólks og víðar um land allt. tækjum og áningarstöðum fyrir ferðalanga í yngri kant­ setra, hvert öðru áhugaverðara. Á blaðsíðu 42 til 43 er Útgefandi: Gúttó ehf., Sólgötu 9, inum. Á síðum 53 til 62 finnurðu allt frá fróðleik um lífið saman tekt yfir nokkur sérstök söfn í minni kantinum, sem 400 Ísafirði, í fjörunni til ábendinga um læki sem henta sérlega vel sumir myndu kannski segja að beri vestfirsku sérviskunni Sími 456 4560 fyrir litlar tær sem vilja ólmar vaða eftir langa bílferð. vitni... Netfang [email protected] Veffang www.bb.is jaransbraut er væntanlega hrikalegasti vegur lands- vo vill vera að þeir sem einu sinni leggja leið sína til Khlutans - ef mælikvarðinn miðast við náttúrufegurð. SVestfjarða snúa þangað aftur. Í blaðinu er að finna Fræðstu um hetjulega baráttu Elís Kjaran við fjöll og þrjár reynslusögur frá þjóðþekktum konum sem allar fjör ur með „teskeiðina“ að vopni á síðu 40. hafa heillast af landshlutanum, hver á sinn hátt. Inga Lind Karlsdóttir segir frá upplifun sinni af ferðalagi um llir eiga sér áhugamál og á blaðsíðu 32 til 34 Vest firði í faðmi fjölskyldunnar, Eva María Jónsdóttir Afinnurðu kannski eitthvað við þitt hæfi.
    [Show full text]
  • Marla J. Koberstein
    Master‘s thesis Expansion of the brown shrimp Crangon crangon L. onto juvenile plaice Pleuronectes platessa L. nursery habitat in the Westfjords of Iceland Marla J. Koberstein Advisor: Jόnas Páll Jόnasson University of Akureyri Faculty of Business and Science University Centre of the Westfjords Master of Resource Management: Coastal and Marine Management Ísafjörður, February 2013 Supervisory Committee Advisor: Name, title Reader: Name, title Program Director: Dagný Arnarsdóttir, MSc. Marla Koberstein Expansion of the brown shrimp Crangon crangon L. onto juvenile plaice Pleuronectes platessa L. nursery habitat in the Westfjords of Iceland 45 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Master of Resource Management degree in Coastal and Marine Management at the University Centre of the Westfjords, Suðurgata 12, 400 Ísafjörður, Iceland Degree accredited by the University of Akureyri, Faculty of Business and Science, Borgir, 600 Akureyri, Iceland Copyright © 2013 Marla Koberstein All rights reserved Printing: Háskólaprent, Reykjavik, February 2013 Declaration I hereby confirm that I am the sole author of this thesis and it is a product of my own academic research. __________________________________________ Student‘s name Abstract Sandy-bottom coastal ecosystems provide integral nursery habitat for juvenile fishes, and threats to these regions compromise populations at this critical life stage. The threat of aquatic invasive species in particular can be difficult to detect, and climate change may facilitate the spread and establishment of new species. In 2003, the European brown shrimp Crangon crangon L. was discovered off the southwest coast of Iceland. This species is a concern for Iceland due to the combination of its dominance in coastal communities and level of predation on juvenile flatfish, namely plaice Pleuronectes platessa L., observed in its native range.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release 26.10.2020
    Press Release 26.10.2020 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contacts: Regarding Vestfjarðaleiðin - #TheWestfjordsWay Díana Jóhannsdóttir, Visit Westfjords Email: [email protected] Phone: +354 450-3002/+354 869-1213 Regarding West Iceland Thelma Harðardóttir, Visit West Iceland Email: [email protected] Phone: +354 433-2316 Regarding the Icelandic Road and Costal Administration G. Pétur Matthíasson Email: [email protected] Phone: +354 522-1000 THE NEW DRIVING ROUTE VESTFJARÐALEIÐIN (E. WESTFJORDS WAY) OF 950 KM (590 MI) OFFICIALLY OPENING IN ICELAND ON 25TH OCTOBER PROMISING ONE OF THE MOST SCENIC AND CULTURAL DRIVING ROUTES IN THE WORLD, CIRCUMNAVIGATING THE REMOTE WESTFJORDS PENINSULA AND DALABYGGÐ - Dramatic circular driving route, unpretentious and challenging, summoned by the people of the Westfjords who deal with the elements and nature in their own way - Dýrafjörður, Westfjords, Iceland 25th October 2020 marks the launch of Vestfjarðaleiðin (e. Westfjords Way) by the opening of a tunnel between Arnarfjörður and Dýrafjörður, an important link between the north and south parts of the Westfjords. The opening of the Dýrafjörður Tunnel ensures the new Westfjords Way will be open year-round by relieving the Hrafnseyrarheiði mountain pass that is unpaved and closed for long periods of the year. Vestfjarðaleiðin is however more than just a scenic route as it is also a way of life in the Westfjords and Dalabyggð, the part that looks a little bit like a head on Iceland’s body. The Westfjords have in this way always stood proud from the rest of Iceland, physically and culturally. The Westfjords peninsula is older than Iceland’s body, dramatically marked by the Ice age 10 thousand years ago with deep fjords that provide a unique driving route adorned with cliffs, craggy mountains, valleys, lowlands and unique flora and fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoca Vitulina) in Icelandic Waters
    Monitoring trends in the abundance of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) in Icelandic waters Erlingur Hauksson Fornistekkur 14, IS-109 Reykjavik, Iceland ABSTRACT Harbours seal ( Phoca vitulina) numbers along the coast of Iceland were monitored by aerial survey in the period 1980-2006. Trends in the abundance of the harbour seal population on the whole coast and in coastal regions of Iceland waters were estimated using ANCOVA on the sur - vey counts, corrected for the influence of several covariates. Harbour seals were found in every coastal area, but were most abundant in Faxaflói, Breiðafjörður and on the northwest coast in the beginning of this study. Harbour seal numbers declined significantly at a rate of res t = -0.04 (SE 0.005) y r-1 during this period. Decline was highest in Faxaflói and at the south coast ( ≅7%), while the east coast experienced a significant but lesser ( ≅1%) decline. Other coastal areas did not show significant trends. The northwest coast was the richest harbour seal area in Iceland in 2006. In Icelandic waters seals are commercially harvested, and unreported but probably high numbers of harbour seals are killed intentionally by shooting and accidentally in fishing gear each year. These factors likely contributed to the overall observed decline in seal numbers. Hauksson, E. 2010. Monitoring trends in the abundance of harbour seals ( Phoca vitulina ) in Icelandic waters. NAMMCO Sci. Publ. 8:227-244. INTRODUCTION ecosystem dynamics, its potential interactions with fisheries, the impacts of global climate An understanding of population status of the change, and other anthropogenic changes Icelandic harbour seal ( Phoca vitulina vituli - caused in habitat (Small et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Flugtalningar 2011 Endanleg
    VMST/11051 Landselstalning úr lofti árið 2011: Framvinda og niðurstöður Sandra M. Granquist, Erlingur Hauksson, Arna Björg Árnadóttir og Jacob Kasper Nóvember 2011 Veiðimálastofnun Veiðinýting • Lífríki í ám og vötnum • Rannsóknir • Ráðgjöf VMST/11051 Landselstalning úr lofti árið 2011: Framvinda og niðurstöður Sandra M. Granquist 1, Erlingur Hauksson 2, Arna Björg Árnadóttir 1 og Jacob Kasper 3,4 1 2 Unnið í samstarfi við Selasetur Íslands , Rannsjá , 3 4 BioPol ehf . og Hafrannsóknarstofnun 1. Selasetur Íslands , Brekkugata 2, 530 Hvammstanga, 2. Rannsjá , Fornistekkur 14, 109 Reykjavík, 3. Biopol ehf . Einbúastíg 2, 545 Skagaströnd, 4. Hafrannsóknarstofnun , Einbúastíg 2, 545 Skagaströnd Veiðimálastofnun Veiðinýting • Lífríki í ám og vötnum • Rannsóknir • Ráðgjöf Efnisyfirlit Efnisyfirlit .................................................................................................................................................. i Töfluskrá ...................................................................................................................................................ii Myndaskrá ................................................................................................................................................ii Viðaukaskrá ..............................................................................................................................................ii Ágrip .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Greinargerð Um Stöðu Haf- Og
    Greinargerð um stöðu haf- og strandsvæðaskipulags Uppfærð með viðbrögðum Skipulagsstofnunar við athugasemdum Fylgiskjal með landsskipulagsstefnu 2013-2024 1 Greinargerð um stöðu haf- og strandsvæðaskipulags - Uppfærð með viðbrögðum Skipulagsstofnunar við athugasemdum Fylgiskjal með Landsskipulagsstefnu 2013-2024 Útgefandi: Skipulagsstofnun, desember 2012 Texti: Skipulagsstofnun ISBN: 978-9935-9109-4-3 Skipulagsstofnun, Laugavegi 166, 150 Reykjavík www.landsskipulag.is Greinargerð um stöðu haf- og strandsvæðaskipulags | 2 Efnisyfirl it Efnisyfirlit ................................................................................................................................... 3 1 Inngangur .......................................................................................................................... 5 2 Alþjóðlegir samningar og stefnur íslenskra stjórnvalda ..................................................... 7 2.1 Alþjóðlegir samningar ........................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Hafréttarsamningurinn (UNCLOS) .......................................................................... 7 2.1.2 OSPAR-samningurinn .............................................................................................. 8 2.1.3 MARPOL – samningur um varnir gegn mengun sjávar ........................................... 8 2.1.4 Alþjóðahafrannsóknaráðið ..................................................................................... 9 2.1.5 Samningur um líffræðilega
    [Show full text]
  • Hafrannsóknastofnunin. Fjölrit Nr. 133
    Hafrannsóknastofnunin. Fjölrit nr. 133 Friðun svæða og skyndilokanir á Íslandsmiðum Sögulegt yfirlit Sigfús A. Schopka Reykjavík 2007 2 Hafrannsóknastofnunin. Fjölrit nr. 133 Friðun svæða og skyndilokanir 3 EFNISYFIRLIT FORMÁLI………………………………………………………………………………….....5 ÁGRIP……………………………………………………………………………………........7 ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………...7 1. INNGANGUR……………………………………………………………………………...9 2. FYRSTU SKREFIN………………………………………………………………………..9 2.1 Friðun hrygningarstöðva síldar 1969 og1970…………………………………….............11 3. FRIÐUN SVÆÐA 1972-1976.............................................................................................12 3.1 Norðausturhólfið.................................................................................................................13 3.2 Frímerkið.............................................................................................................................13 3.3 Tillögur Hafrannsóknastofnunarinnar um nýtingu íslenskra fiskstofna............................. 14 3.4 Gildran................................................................................................................................15 3.5 Strandagrunn.......................................................................................................................15 3.6 Kolbeinsey..........................................................................................................................16 3.7 Reykjafjarðaráll...................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Skrá Yfir Íslensk Skip Og Báta 2018
    Skrá yfir íslensk skip og báta 2018 Skráð þilfarsskip og opnir bátar samkvæmt aðalskipaskrá þann 1. janúar 2018 Register of Icelandic Decked Ships and Open Boats on January 1st 2018 Jákvæðni Fagmennska Traust Virðing - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Samgöngustofa Ármúla 2 108 Reykjavík http://www.samgongustofa.is/ Vefútgáfa 2018. Heimilt er að prenta vefritið til eigin nota en óheimilt er að prenta það eða afrita með nokkrum öðrum hætti í því skyni að selja það án heimildar frá Samgöngustofu. Efnisyfirlit Contents Íslensk skip og bátar — yfirlit 1. janúar 2018 1 Summary of Icelandic Decked Ships and Open Boats on January 1st 2018 Nýskráningar og endurskráningar 2017 2 Registered Ships and Boats in 2017 Afskráningar 2017 3 Decommissioned Ships and Boats in 2017 Skýringar við skipaskrá 4 Key to the Register of Ships Skýringar við bátaskrá 7 Key to the Register of Boats Skráð þilfarsskip samkvæmt aðalskipaskrá 1. janúar 2018 8 Register of Icelandic Decked Ships on January 1st 2018 Skrá yfir opna báta 1. janúar 2018 115 Register of Icelandic Open Boats on January 1st 2018 Einkaréttur á skipsnöfnum 244 Prerogative of Icelandic Ship Names Íslensk skip og bátar — yfirlit 1. janúar 2018 Á aðalskipaskrá 1. janúar 2018 voru samtals 2.295 skip. Skipum á íslenskri aðalskipaskrá hefur fjölgað um 6 frá árinu 2017. Á árinu 2016 voru frumskráð og endurskráð skip 36, afskráð skip voru 36. Hér gefur að líta töflu yfir þróun skipastólsins 1. janúar ár hvert. Fjöldi og stærð 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Þilfarsskip 1.051 1.050 1.060 1.056 1.051 1.041 1.031 1.032 Brúttótonn 203.319 206.248 212.155 198.871 194.278 198.079 200.246 208.375 Opnir bátar 1.199 1.216 1.238 1.244 1.245 1.243 1.258 1.263 Brúttótonn 7.112 7.233 7.460 7.538 7.591 7.621 8.935 7.327 Heildarfjöldi 2.250 2.266 2.298 2.300 2.296 2.284 2.289 2.295 Heildarbrúttótonn 210.431 213.481 219.615 206.409 201.869 205.701 209.181 215.702 Skip á aðalskipaskrá skiptast þannig eftir skráður notkunarflokkum: 1.jan.16 1.jan.17 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for Common Ground: Broadening the Definition of ‘Rights-Based’ Fisheries Management in Iceland’S Westfjords
    Master‘s Thesis Fishing For Common Ground: Broadening the Definition of ‘Rights-based’ Fisheries Management in Iceland’s Westfjords Katie Auth Advisor: Níels Einarsson, Ph.D. University of Akureyri Faculty of Business and Science University Centre of the Westfjords Master of Resource Management: Coastal and Marine Management Ísafjörður, May 2012 2 Supervisory Committee Advisor: Níels Einarsson, Ph.D., Director of the Stefansson Arctic Institute Reader: Gísli Pálsson, Ph. D., Professor of Anthropology at the University of Iceland Program Director: Dagný Arnarsdóttir, MSc. Katie Auth Fishing For Common Ground: Broadening the Definition of ‘Rights-based’ Fisheries Management in Iceland’s Westfjords 45 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of a Master of Resource Management degree in Coastal and Marine Management at the University Centre of the Westfjords, Suðurgata 12, 400 Ísafjörður, Iceland Degree accredited by the University of Akureyri, Faculty of Business and Science, Borgir, 600 Akureyri, Iceland Copyright © 2012 Katie Auth All rights reserved Printing: Háskólaprent, Reykjavík, June 2012 3 Declaration I hereby confirm that I am the sole author of this thesis and it is a product of my own academic research. __________________________________________ Student‘s name 4 Abstract Since the 1980s, so-called “rights-based” fisheries management regimes – specifically those designed to apply market forces to problems of inefficiency and overfishing by divvying up fixed, tradable proportions of a total allowable catch among individuals or cooperatives – have become both one of the most widely advocated and most contentious aspects of marine resource management. Iceland, promoted by some as a successful international model of this approach, has been the site – for nearly thirty years – of fierce debate and controversy regarding the system’s effects on regional development, social justice and wealth disparity.
    [Show full text]