DOCSLIB.ORG

Con Nental Colours 1775 – 1777 the First Unites States Flag

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Con Nental Colours 1775 – 1777 the First Unites States Flag Con%nental Colours (a.k.a. Grand Union Flag) 1775 – 1777 The First Unites States Flag Bales of Lexington and ConCord, 19 April 1775 Paul Revere 1734 (O.S.) - 1818 Thomas Gage C. 1719 – 1787 Gov. of Massachuse?s Bay William Dawes 1745 - 1799 Bale of ConCord, 19 April 1775 General Gage sent 700 troops to ConCord to seize Colonial muni%ons. At the North Bridge, Bri%sh troops enCountered ACton and ConCord mili%a and a bale ensued. The Bri%sh retreated to Boston aer finding nothing in ConCord. Bale of Bunker Hill, 17 June 1775 The Colonial mili%as of Massachuse?s, ConneC%Cut, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island and ProvidenCe Plantaons gathered in Cambridge and laid siege to Boston. Over 3000 Colonial mili%a fought 2400 Bri%sh. The Bri%sh won a Costly bale in terms of dead and wounded. Boston on 29 July 1775 Fort TiConderoga, seized by Ethan Allen and the Green Mountain Boys in May 1775 In the winter 1776, the Cannons were hauled to Boston and brought to DorChester Heights whiCh prompted the Bri%sh to evacuate Boston on 17 MarCh 1776. The SeCond Con%nental Congress Convened at Philadelphia on 10 May 1775 and disbanded on 6 MarCh 1781 Bale of QuébeC City, 31 DeCember 1775 The AmeriCan Con%nental Army totalling 1200 men lead by Generals RiChard Montgomery (killed), BenediCt Arnold, and Daniel Morgan (Captured) were defeated by the Bri%sh forCes totalling 1800 men. FiZy AmeriCans were killed, 34 wounded and 431 Captured versus five Bri%sh killed and 14 wounded. In June 1776, the Con%nental Congress Created a Commi?ee of five to dra a deClaraon of independence 2 July 1776, the Congress voted to for independenCe: 12 Colonies in favour 1 Colony (New York) abstained 4 July 1776, the Congress approved the wording of the DeClaraon of IndependenCe, Signed the handwri?en dra, and sent it to the printer. 8 July 1776 it was publiCly proClaimed in Philadelphia and Easton, Penn. and in Trenton, New Jersey 9 July 1776, it was published in German. The DeClaraon of IndependenCe In Congress, July 4, 1776 IntroduC%on The unanimous DeClaraon of the thirteen united States of AmeriCa, The Congress Claimed that a people have the ability to assert or Claim their When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one poli%Cal independenCe as a maer of people to dissolve the poli8cal bands which have connected them with Nature Law. The reasoning for that another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate independenCe was reasonable and and equal sta8on to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God explained. en8tle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separa8on. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, Preamble that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. This paragraph jus%fies the Revolu%on That to secure these rights, Governments are ins8tuted among Men, by outlying the a general philosophy of deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That government when it Can be shown that whenever any Form of Government becomes destrucve of these ends, a government is violang natural law. it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to ins8tute new Government, laying its founda8on on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their The philosophy of government and Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments natural law was based upon the long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; theories of Englishman John LoCke and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more (1632-1704). His theory of government disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves had a signifiCant role in the evolu%on of by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long the Bri%sh government by forming the train of abuses and usurpa8ons, pursuing invariably the same Object raonale of the Glorious Revolu%on of evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despo8sm, it is their 1688-1689. right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Such has been the pa8ent sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the IndiCtment necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is is a history The largest seC%on of DeClaraon of repeated injuries and usurpa8ons, all having in direct object the of IndependenCe is a list of establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Complaints, ‘repeated injuries and Facts be submiSed to a candid world. usurpaons’ of the rights of He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for liber%es of AmeriCans, many of the public good. those being the rights of He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing Englishmen that the government importance, unless suspended in their opera8on 8ll his Assent should be of Great Britain has abused. obtained; and when so suspended, he has uSerly neglected to aSend to them. He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommoda8on of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representa8on in the Legislature, a right ines8mable to them and formidable to tyrants only. He has called together legisla8ve bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fa8guing them into compliance with his measures. He has dissolved Representa8ve Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness of his invasions on the rights of the people. He has refused for a long 8me, aVer such dissolu8ons, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legisla8ve Powers, incapable of Annihila8on, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean 8me exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within. He has endeavoured to prevent the popula8on of these States; for that purpose obstrucng the Laws for Naturaliza8on of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migra8ons hither, and raising the condi8ons of new Appropriaons of Lands. He has obstructed the Administra8on of Jus8ce by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing IndiCtment Judiciary Powers. connued He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. He has erected a mul8tude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance. He has kept among us, in 8mes of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures. He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power. He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdicon foreign to our cons8tu8on, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legisla8on: For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: For protecng them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States: For cung off our Trade with all parts of the world: For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury For transpor8ng us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences: For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments: For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protecon and waging War against us. He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. He is at this 8me transpor8ng large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat IndiCtment Con%nued the works of death, desola8on, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized na8on. He has constrained our fellow Ci8zens taken Cap8ve on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the execu8oners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. He has excited domes8c insurrecons amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our fron8ers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undis8nguished destrucon of all ages, sexes and condi8ons. In every stage of these Oppressions We have Pe88oned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Pe88ons have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Nor have We been wan8ng in aSen8ons to our Bri8sh brethren. We have warned DenunCiaon them from 8me to 8me of aSempts by their legislature to extend an This paragraph summarizes unwarrantable jurisdicon over us.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The CONSTITUTIONS of CALIFORNIA and the UNITED STATES with Related Documents
    The CONSTITUTIONS of CALIFORNIA and THE UNITED STATES with Related Documents 2017–18 Edition Cover: Spring Flowers (Poppies and Lupine, Goleta Point), n.d. John Marshall Gamble Crocker Art Museum, Melza and Ted Barr Collection, 2008.102 CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 1879 As Last Amended November 8, 2016 and Related Documents 2017–18 CALIFORNIA STATE LEGISLATURE LT. GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM HON. ANTHONY RENDON President of the Senate Speaker of the Assembly HON. KEVIN DE LEÓN HON. KEVIN MULLIN President pro Tempore of the Senate Speaker pro Tempore JEAN FULLER HON. CHAD MAYES Minority Floor Leader Republican Leader DANIEL ALVAREZ E. DOTSON WILSON Secretary of the Senate Chief Clerk of the Assembly THE STATE FLAG The Bear Flag was designated California’s State Flag by legislative enactment in 1911. It is patterned after the historic flag flown at Sonoma on June 14, 1846, by a group of American settlers in revolt against Mexican rule in California. This short-lived revolution ended on July 9, 1846. The general design and details of the Bear Flag are set forth in Section 420 of the Government Code. FOREWORD The California Legislature is privileged to present this compilation of historic documents. Taken together, these compacts, treaties, and charters embody the ongoing evolution of our core principles of representative democracy. It is important to note that our state Constitution is a living document. It has been amended over 500 times since its adoption in 1879. Some recent amendments have included a change to California’s Term Limits law through the passage of Proposition 28 (2012), the California Legislature Transparency Act enacted by Proposition 54 (2016) enhances public access to the legislative process, and with the adoption of Proposition 25 (2010), the vote threshold to pass the state budget is now a majority vote.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW JERSEY and the UNITED STATES
    a HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS of NEW JERSEY and the UNITED STATES INCLUDING The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, The U.S. Constitution and The New Jersey Constitution a A New Jersey State Bar Foundation publication The New Jersey State Bar Foundation hopes that this booklet, Historic Documents of New Jersey and the United States, will inspire teachers and students alike to delve into America’s rich history to debate the fundamentals of democracy and what these documents mean in today’s society. Other civic publications offered by the Foundation that may be of interest include Educational Guide for Trial Jurors (second edition), which outlines New Jersey’s jury system, and the Bill of Rights Bulletin, a 24-page newsletter that contains articles related to federal constitutional issues, as well as constitutional trivia and puzzles. Also available from the Foundation is Constitutionally New Jersey, a newsletter about the New Jersey Constitution. Meant to complement the Bill of Rights Bulletin, this publication contains articles and puzzles related directly to New Jersey’s Constitution. Founded in 1958, the New Jersey State Bar Foundation is the educational and philanthropic arm of the New Jersey State Bar Association. The Bar Foundation’s mission is to promote public understanding of the law through a free, comprehensive public education program. Among its activities, the Foundation conducts conflict resolution and peer mediation trainings and teasing and bullying trainings for educators and administrators, publishes materials, operates a videotape loan library and speakers bureau, and coordinates elementary, middle and high school mock trial competitions. For more information about the Foundation’s programs and publications, visit us online at www.njsbf.org or call 1-800-FREE-LAW.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    34 Biographical Directory DELEGATES IN THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS CONNECTICUT Dates of Attendance Andrew Adams............................ 1778 Benjamin Huntington................ 1780, Joseph Spencer ........................... 1779 Joseph P. Cooke ............... 1784–1785, 1782–1783, 1788 Jonathan Sturges........................ 1786 1787–1788 Samuel Huntington ................... 1776, James Wadsworth....................... 1784 Silas Deane ....................... 1774–1776 1778–1781, 1783 Jeremiah Wadsworth.................. 1788 Eliphalet Dyer.................. 1774–1779, William S. Johnson........... 1785–1787 William Williams .............. 1776–1777 1782–1783 Richard Law............ 1777, 1781–1782 Oliver Wolcott .................. 1776–1778, Pierpont Edwards ....................... 1788 Stephen M. Mitchell ......... 1785–1788 1780–1783 Oliver Ellsworth................ 1778–1783 Jesse Root.......................... 1778–1782 Titus Hosmer .............................. 1778 Roger Sherman ....... 1774–1781, 1784 Delegates Who Did Not Attend and Dates of Election John Canfield .............................. 1786 William Hillhouse............. 1783, 1785 Joseph Trumbull......................... 1774 Charles C. Chandler................... 1784 William Pitkin............................. 1784 Erastus Wolcott ...... 1774, 1787, 1788 John Chester..................... 1787, 1788 Jedediah Strong...... 1782, 1783, 1784 James Hillhouse ............... 1786, 1788 John Treadwell ....... 1784, 1785, 1787 DELAWARE Dates of Attendance Gunning Bedford,
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of William Colbert for the Northumberland, Wyoming And
    Introduction 3 Introduction: The Man and His Journal Early Methodist Episcopal circuit rider William Colbert (1764-1833) served circuits in Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, and Virginia. He was admitted on trial in 1790 1 and into full connection in 1792, at which time he was also ordained a deacon. Colbert was ordained an elder in 1795. He served most of his time as a traveling minister and retired from the itinerancy in 1811. William Colbert was born near Baltimore in Poolesville MD on April 20, 1764. Historian George Peck wrote in 1860 2 that Colbert was remembered by those who heard him preach for his intolerance of noisy children, crowded barns and other unfavorable meeting conditions. He was, however, a dedicated man of God and served with distinction as a circuit rider and district superintendent (or, as it was then called, presiding elder). In November 1804 William Colbert married Elizabeth Stroud (1784- 1849), whose parents were the original founders of Stroudsburg PA. He died June 16, 1833, in Stroudsburg PA. William Colbert kept a journal of his travels – which ranks with Francis Asbury’s as one of the earliest definitive records of American Methodism and its circuits. While a three-volume edited, indexed and annotated transcription of Asbury’s journal has been published, no one has yet undertaken that task for Colbert’s journal. The original journal and a typewritten transcription are prized possessions within the special collections at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary in Evanston IL. In 1957, the Library of Congress microfilmed the typewritten copy. In 1964 the Central Pennsylvania Conference purchased a microfilm copy of the journal from the LOC.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Account of the Old State House of Pennsylvania Now
    Independence Hall, 1876. FRONT VIEW. AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT UK THE OLD STATE HOUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA NOW KNOWN AS THE HALL OF INDEPENDENCE « BY / FRANK M ETTING WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS BOSTON JAMES R. OSGOOD AND COMPANY 1876 Copyright, 1874, By FRANK M ETTING KIVERSIDE, CAMBRIDGE: •EREOTYPED AND PRINTED BY H. O. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY. PREFACE In the work that I had " found for my hand to do," it became necessary to examine carefully into the details of the building of the State House of Pennsylvania ; much that surprised me came to light not only in the circumstances of its erection but in its subsequent C history. Instead of Dr. Kearsley, to whom the credit had been as- cribed, I discovered that its Architect and actual Builder was one of the greatest men ever fostered by Pennsylvania ; and that every important movement, from the very inception of the efforts of the colonists to assert their constitutional liberty, first assumed shape either within this building or under the shadow of its walls. A friendly suggestion thrown out induced me to extend still further my investigations, with a view of preserving the information in print in some accessible form. This desire was enhanced by the hope that the general public would ultimately share in the interest which every brick of this old build- ing possesses for me, and thus be inclined to lend each his individual aid towards its preservation, and to insure its proper custodianship for all time. The desultory way in which, from causes unnecessary to be detailed, my memoranda have been thrown together, must leave its impress, and I cannot expect to be exempt from inaccuracies ; but having done my best without fee or reward, present or prospective, I have no apologies to make to the public for claiming their notice.
    [Show full text]
  • PAH 78.3 01 Myers.Indd
    HOMELAND SECURITY IN THE PENNSYLVANIA BACKCOUNTRY, 1777–1778: THE EXAMPLE OF THE REVEREND MR. DANIEL BATWELLE, SPG James P. Myers Jr. Gettysburg College hroughout the Revolutionary War, the Associated Loyalists of southcentral Pennsylvania conspired either to destroy or to seize Tweapons from the US arsenals in Carlisle, York, and Lancaster. 1 The names of several residents of Cumberland, York, and Lancaster Counties, some openly known to be Loyalists, others clandestinely working for the British, recur in correspondence, depositions, and other documents of the period. 2 The purpose of this essay, however, is not to rehearse the history of those known to be working against the patriot cause. Rather, it will focus on the Reverend Mr. Daniel Batwelle, Anglican missionary for the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts (SPG), who was accused and imprisoned, but never tried, for allegedly participating in one such plot. Batwelle’s case reveals the strenu- ous efforts by radical patriots in Cumberland and York Counties to enforce ideological conformity on American citizens dwelling pennsylvania history: a journal of mid-atlantic studies, vol. 78, no. 3, 2011. Copyright © 2011 The Pennsylvania Historical Association This content downloaded from 128.118.152.206 on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:25:46 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms PPAHAH 778.3_01_Myers.indd8.3_01_Myers.indd 224747 223/08/113/08/11 111:041:04 AAMM pennsylvania history “over Susquehanna.” As spiritual leader of a religious group whose members generally advocated either reconciliation with Great Britain or resistance to the new nation born of revolution, and as one who knew several Associated Loyalists, Batwelle was identified early on as a potential enemy of the United States precisely because of his importance to the Anglican community in these two counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Charters of Freedom History/Social Studies Contents
    Charters of Freedom History/Social Studies Contents 1 Wikijunior:United States Charters of Freedom 1 1.1 Important Documents ........................................... 1 1.2 Other Concepts .............................................. 2 2 Declaration of Independence 4 2.1 Background ................................................ 4 2.2 Draft and adoption ............................................. 4 2.3 Distribution and copies .......................................... 5 2.4 Text and analysis .............................................. 6 2.4.1 Introduction ............................................ 6 2.4.2 Preamble ............................................. 6 2.4.3 Indictment ............................................. 7 2.4.4 Denunciation ........................................... 8 2.4.5 Conclusion ............................................ 8 2.5 Text on the back of the document ..................................... 9 2.6 Differences between draft and final versions ................................ 9 2.7 Myths ................................................... 10 2.8 Questions ................................................. 10 2.9 Source ................................................... 11 3 Constitution 19 3.1 Background ................................................ 19 3.2 Text of the Constitution .......................................... 19 3.2.1 Preamble ............................................. 20 3.2.2 Article I .............................................. 21 3.2.3 Article II ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • High School | 9Th–12Th Grade
    High School | 9th–12th Grade American History 1776The Hillsdale Curriculum The Hillsdale 1776 Curriculum 9th–12th Grade HIGH SCHOOL American History 2 units | 45–50-minute classes OVERVIEW Unit 1 | The American Founding 15–19 classes LESSON 1 1763–1776 Self–Government or Tyranny LESSON 2 1776 The Declaration of Independence LESSON 3 1776–1783 The War of Independence LESSON 4 1783–1789 The United States Constitution Unit 2 | The American Civil War 14–18 classes LESSON 1 1848–1854 The Expansion of Slavery LESSON 2 1854–1861 Toward Civil War LESSON 3 1861–1865 The Civil War LESSON 4 1865–1877 Reconstruction 1 Copyright © 2021 Hillsdale College. All Rights Reserved. The Hillsdale 1776 Curriculum American History High School UNIT 1 The American Founding 1763–1789 45–50-minute classes | 15–19 classes UNIT PREVIEW Structure LESSON 1 1763–1776 Self-Government or Tyranny 4–5 classes p. 7 LESSON 2 1776 The Declaration of Independence 2–3 classes p. 14 LESSON 3 1776–1783 The War of Independence 3–4 classes p. 23 LESSON 4 1783–1789 The United States Constitution 4–5 classes p. 29 APPENDIX A Study Guide, Test, and Writing Assignment p. 41 APPENDIX B Primary Sources p. 59 Why Teach the American Founding The beginning is the most important part of any endeavor, for a small change at the beginning will result in a very different end. How much truer this is of the most expansive of human endeavors: founding and sustaining a free country. The United States of America has achieved the greatest degree of freedom and prosperity for the greatest proportion of any country’s population in the history of humankind.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Founding Fathers -- Who Are They? Thumbnail Sketches of 164 Patriots
    AMERICA’S FOUNDING FATHERS Who are they? Thumbnail sketches of 164 patriots JACK STANFIELD Universal Publishers USA • 2001 America's Founding Fathers -- Who are they? Thumbnail sketches of 164 patriots Copyright © 2001 Jack R. Stanfield All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except in case of review, without the prior written permission of the author. Author’s Note: The information is accurate to the extent the author could confirm it from readily available sources. Neither the author nor the publisher can assume any responsibility for any action taken based on information contained in this book. Universal Publishers/uPUBLISH.com USA • 2001 ISBN: 1-58112-668-9 www.uPUBLISH.com/books/stanfield.htm To my wife Barbara who inspired this book, and without whose patience and encouragement, it would not have been completed. Content INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 SETTING THE STAGE 10 SKETCHES OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS 23 CHAPTER 2 FOUNDING FATHERS FROM CONNECTICUT 24 Andrew Adams, Oliver Ellsworth, Titus Hosmer, Samuel Huntington, William Samuel Johnson, Roger Sherman, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott CHAPTER 3 FOUNDING FATHERS FROM DELAWARE 32 Richard Bassett, Gunning Bedford, Jacob Broom, John Dickinson, Thomas McKean, George Read, Caesar Rodney, Nicolas Van Dyke CHAPTER 4 FOUNDING FATHERS FROM GEORGIA 39 Abraham Baldwin, William Few, Button Gwinnett, Layman Hall,William Houstoun,
    [Show full text]
  • Articles of Confederation
    ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION [Adopted by the Congress of the United States November 15, 1777, and submitted for ratification to the several states. Ratification consummated and proclaimed March 1, 1781.] PREAMBLE. ARTICLE IX. Powers of congress — declaring peace and war — entering ARTICLE I. Style of confederacy. into treaties — captures and prizes — letters of marque and reprisal — ARTICLE II. Each state retains all powers courts for trial of piracies and felonies not expressly delegated to congress. on high seas — appeals in case of captures — differences between states ARTICLE III. Obligations and purposes of — mode of choosing commissioners or the league of the states. judges — private right of soil claimed under two or more states — coining ARTICLE IV. Freedom of intercourse money — weights and measures — between the states — surrender of Indian affairs — post routes — army fugitives from justice — records, acts — navy — committee of the states and judicial proceedings of courts to — other committees — civil officers be received with full faith and credit — president — public expenses — by other states. borrowing money — bills of credit — land and naval forces — quotas ARTICLE V. Congress — how organized based on a census — states to raise and maintained — each state to have and equip men at expense of United one vote — privileges of delegates. States — enumeration of measures requiring the assent of a majority of ARTICLE VI. No state may send embassies the states — adjournments of congress or make treaties — persons holding — journals — copies of proceedings to office not to accept presents, be furnished to states if desired. emoluments or titles from foreign states — nor shall titles of nobility ARTICLE X.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles of Confederation
    [1231] ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION HISTORICAL BACKGROUND While the Declaration of Independence was under consideration in the Continental Congress, and before it was finally agreed upon, meas- ures were taken for the establishment of a constitutional form of govern- ment; and on the 11th of June, 1776, it was ‘‘Resolved, That a committee be appointed to prepare and digest the form of a confederation to be entered into between these Colonies’’; which committee was appointed the next day, June 12, and consisted of a member from each Colony, namely: Mr. Bartlett, Mr. S. Adams, Mr. Hopkins, Mr. Sherman, Mr. R. R. Livingston, Mr. Dickinson, Mr. McKean, Mr. Stone, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Hewes, Mr. E. Rutledge, and Mr. Gwinnett. On the 12th of July, 1776, the committee reported a draft of the Articles of Confederation, which was printed for the use of the members under the strictest injunc- tions of secrecy. This report underwent a thorough discussion in Congress, from time to time, until the 15th of November, 1777; on which day, ‘‘Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union’’ were finally agreed to in form, and they were directed to be proposed to the legislatures of all the United States, and if approved by them, they were advised to authorize their delegates to ratify the same in the Congress of the United States; and in that event they were to become conclusive. On the 17th of Novem- ber, 1777, the Congress agreed upon the form of a circular letter to accompany the Articles of Confederation, which concluded with a rec- ommendation to each of the several legislatures ‘‘to invest its delegates with competent powers, ultimately, and in the name and behalf of the State, to subscribe articles of confederation and perpetual union of the United States, and to attend Congress for that purpose on or before the 10th day of March next.’’ This letter was signed by the President of Congress and sent, with a copy of the articles, to each State legisla- ture.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE of CONTENTS Volume 1
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Preface ................................................................................................................................................xvii Introduction ........................................................................................................................................xxv A Andrew Adams ...................................................................................................................................... 1 John Adams ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Samuel Adams ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Thomas Adams .................................................................................................................................... 18 Robert Alexander ................................................................................................................................. 19 Andrew Allen ....................................................................................................................................... 21 John Alsop ........................................................................................................................................... 24 Benjamin Andrew ................................................................................................................................ 27 Annapolis State
    [Show full text]