<<

424 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS these studies.We thank D. Lemmon for comments on jays-with a theory for the evolution of altruism the manuscript. We thank Roland Wauer, Michael and communal breeding. Am. Zool. 14:63-80. Fleming and the National Park Service for their help BROWN,J. L. 1986. Cooperative breeding and the and permission to work in Big Bend National Park. regulationof numbers. Proc. XVIII Int. Ornithol. Congr. (1982):774-782. LITERATURE CITED BROWN.J. L.. AND E. R. BROWN. 1985. Ecoloeical correlatesof group size in a communally breeding BRANDT,H. W. 1940. Texas adventures. Bird bird. Condor 87:309-3 15. ResearchFoundation, Cleveland. LIGON,J. D., AND S. L. HUSAR. 1974. Notes on the BROWN,J. L. 1963. Social organizationand behavior behavioral ecology of Couch’s Mexican Jay. Auk of the Mexican Jay. Condor 65: 126-l 53. 91:841-843. BROWN,J. L. 1964. The integration of agonistic be- VAN TUNE,J. 1929. Notes on some of the Chi- havior in the Steller’s Jay Cvanocitta stelleri SOSMountains of Texas. Auk 46:204-206. (Gmelin). Univ. Calif. Pub11Zobl. 60:223-328. WAUER,R. H. 1973. Birds of Big Bend National Park BROWN,J. L. 1972. Communal feeding of nestlings and vicinity. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin. in the Mexican Jay (Aphelocomaultramarina): in- WOOLFENDEN,G. E., AND J. W. FITZPATRICK.1984. terflock comparisons.Anim. Behav. 20:395-402. The Florida Scrub Jay: demography of a cooper- BROWN,J. L. 1974. Alternate routes to sociality in ative-breeding Bird. Princeton Univ. Press, NJ.

The Condor 89~424-426 0 The CooperOrnithological Society 1987

METABOLIC, WATER AND THERMAL RELATIONS OF THE CHILEAN

PHILIPC. WITHERS,”RICHARD B. FORBES,AND MICHAELS. HEDRICK’ Department of Biology,Portland State University,Portland, OR 97207

Key words: Tinamou; waterloss; metabolism; tem- Four Chilean (mean mass 458 f SE 8 a) perature:phylogeny. were obtained from the Washington State Departmem of Fisheries and Wildlife in June 1980. Thev were We presenthere some basic aspectsof the thermal and maintained outdoors under natural photoperiod and metabolic physiologyof the Chilean Tinamou (Notho- ambient temperature throughout the year. The exper- procta perdicaria). Tinamous (Tinamidae) are - iments reported here were conductedin late November like ground birds widely distributed throughout the and in December of 1980 and 1982. A standard flow- neotropics from Mexico to Patagonia.The taxonomic throughrespirometry systemin a constanttemperature statusof tinamous is controversial,but Cracraft (198 1) cabinet was used for the measurement of oxygen con- includes Tinamidae in Palaeognathiformes. Hence, sumption rate (Vo,: ml O,.gm*.hr-I) and evaporative tinamous are suspectedto be closely related to the water loss (EWL: mg H,O.g-l,hrml) at ambient tem- , although they are carinate and therefore may peratures(T,: “C) from - 10 to +30. All experiments be more closely related to other birds than to ratites. were conductedduring the light portion of the ambient The metabolic physiology of tinamous is thus of par- photoperiod (1O:OOto 16:00). The flow rate of dry air ticular interest becauseratites have been shownto have (dew noint < - 5°C) was regulatedwith a Gilson mass considerablylower basal metabolic rates than do car- flow controller and meter. E>currentair was monitored inates (Calder and Dawson 1978, Withers 1983). for 0, content to *O.Ol% with a Servomax 570A para- magnetic0, analyzer calibrated with dry, CO,-free ni- trogen (0% 0,) and room air (20.94% 0,). Incurrent and excurrent air was monitored for water vapor con- ’ Received 19 May 1986. Final acceptance6 October tent to +O.O5”C dewnoint with an EG&G Dew-All 1986. hygrometer(NBS traceablehygrometer calibration). The * Present address:Department of Zoology, Univer- percent 0, and dewpoint were continuously recorded sity of Western , Nedlands, W.A. 6009, Aus- with a dual channel Honeywell stripchart recorder. tralia. Dewpoint was converted to absolute humidity (STP) 3Present address:Department of Zoology, Univer- usingthe equationsof Parrish and Putnam (1977). The sity of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 2A9, Vo, (STPD) and EWL were calculatedusing the equa- Canada. tions of Withers (1977). EWL was not measured at SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 425

T, < 5°C since excurrent water condensedor froze in the air lines. Body temperature (Tb: “C) was measured with a Bailey Instruments Bat-4 thermocouple meter I .5 immediately after the bird was removed from the res- pirometry chamber, using a thermocouple inserted 4 cm into the cloaca. Values are presented as mean t I .o standarderror with the number of observations,or as least squareslinear regressionanalysis with the cor- =I 0.5 relation coefficient (Zar 1984). .> The relationship between Vo, and ambient air for tinamous is typical ofendothermic vertebrates(Fig. 1). OI There was a significantrelationship between Vo, and -10 0 IO 20 30 T, 5 lO.O”C(Vo, = 1.05 - O.O37T,;n = 24; Y = 0.73) but not at T, 2 lO.o”C. The basal VO, at T, 2 10.0 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (C)‘ was 0.69 + 0.03 ml.g-l.hrrl (1.76 W, assuming 1 ml FIGURE 1. Relationship between metabolic rate 0, = 20.1 J). The predicted for a (VO,: ml O,.g-I .hrr') and ambient temperature (T,: 458-g bird is 0.48 ml.g-l.hrl (Withers 1983) “C) for the Chilean Tinamou. Solid line is the best-fit and for a carinate nonpasserineis 0.79 (resting phase) least squareslinear regressionanalysis. Upper broken to 0.98 (activity phase) rnl’g-l.hr-l (Aschoff and Pohl line indicatesthe predicted Vo, valuesfor a 458-g non- 1970). The lower critical temperature of the thermo- passerinecarinate during the active phase(Aschoff and neutral zone, determined from the point of intersection Pohl 1970, Aschoff 1981) and the lower broken line of the Vo, - T, regressionat T, 5 1O.o”C and the mean indicates the predicted Vo, values for a 458-g ratite Vo, at T, 2 lO.o”C, was 9.8”C. The EWL(mg.gml,hr-I) (Withers 1983) with a thermal conductanceof 0.026 was significantlyrelated to T, (EWL = 0.133 + 0.055 ml O,.g-l .hrrl.“C-I. Predicted relationshipsare forced T,; n = 19; r = 0.80). There was a significant relation- to extrapolatethrough T, (39.6%) from below the low- ship betweenEWLlVo, (mg H,O/ml 0,) and T, < 20°C er critical temperature. (EWL/Vo, = 0.08 + O.O9T,; n = 13; r = 0.87). The mean EWLlVo, of 2.07 + 0.07 mg/ml 0, at T, > 18°C for tinamous is similar to the value expectedfor ratites T, = 39.6, was 0.027 i 0.006. This value is statistically (2.1) and greaterthan the value for carinate birds (1.4) identical to that calculatedas Vo,/(T, - T,) for T, < becausethe Vo, is lower (Table 1). T, was independent 20°C of0.026 & 0.001 ml.g~*.hr~l.OC~l(n = 27). The of T,; the mean value was 39.6 ? 0.2”C (n = 32). This conductanceofthe tinamou (at T, > 20°C) was 0.039 ? is similar to T, values for some ratites, but it is within 0.006, ranging from 0.027 to 0.063; the higher values the lower range for carinate nonpasserinebirds (Table were similar to that predicted (0.049). The correspond- 1). ing dry conductance,calculated as C, = C - EHL/T, - Thermal conductance(C: ml O,~g~l.hrl~“C1), es- T3 for all T., was 0.025 -t 0.002 ml.g~l.hrl~“C1 (n = timated as the slope of the regressionbetween VoZ and 2 1); EHL is the evaporative heat loss calculatedfrom T, 5 lo’%, was 0.035 * 0.009 (n = 21). However, this EWL assuming 540 cal.gmIlatent heat of fusion and regressionbetween Vo, and T, extrapolated to T, = 4.8 cal’ml 0,-l. The predicted dry conductancefor a 28.4 & 7.43”C at Vo, = 0, which is significantlylower 458-g bird is 0.025 (Aschoff 1981). than the observed T, of 39.6”C. Consequently, 0.035 The thermal, metabolic, and EWL values measured is only an approximate overestimate of C. An alter- here for tinamous are generally more typical of ratite native estimate of conductance,the slope of the Vo,- birds than carinate birds (Table 1). The basal Vo, of T, relationship for all data, forced through Vo2 = 0 at tinamous measured during the daytime (active phase

TABLE 1. Thermal, metabolic, and evaporative water loss values for the Chilean Tinamou compared with predicted values for a 458-g ratite and a nonpasserinecarinate. Values for tinamous are mean f standarderror.

Tinamou Ratite Carinate

Body temperature (“C) 39.6 + 0.2 38-400.~ 39-42d Basal Vo, (ml.g-l ’hr-I) 0.69 i- 0.03 0.48”,” 0.98 (a)’ Wet conductance(ml O,.gml’ hrL.“C1) 0.026-0.039 - 0.0498 Dry conductance(ml O,.g-l.hrrl.“C1) 0.025 - 0.027~ Lower critical temperature (“C) 9.8 - 20h Evaporative water loss (mg.gml.hrl) (20-30°C) 1.49 f 0.14 - 1.37b EWLlVo, (18-30°C) 2.07 + 0.07 2.1’ 1.40b

pWithers (1983). b Crawford and Lasiewski (I 968). GFamer et al. (I 956), King and Famer (I 96 I), Crawford and Schmidt-Nielsen (1967). d King and Famer (1961). e Calder and Dawson (1978). f(a)Daytime, Aschoff and Pohl (I 970). gAschoff(l981). h Calculated from Aschoff and Pohl (1970) and Aschoff (1981) as 39.6 - (basal Vo,lconductance). 426 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

of their circadian cycle) was intermediate between the Emu. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A. Comp. Physiol. predicted values for ratites and nonpasserinecarinate 60:479-48 1. birds. It is important to recognize that many factors CRACRAFT,J. 1981. Toward a phylogenetic classifi- other than phylogeny (e.g., phase of circadian cycle, cation ofthe recentbirds ofthe world (ClassAves). season,latitude-see Weathers1979) can influencebasal Auk 98:681-714. metabolic rate, so the intermediate basal Vo, of tina- CRAWFORD,E. C., AND R. C. LASIEWSKI.1968. Oxy- mous should not be interpreted as conclusiveevidence gen consumption and respiratory evaporation of for their being phylogeneticallyintermediate between the Emu and . Condor 70:333-339. ratites and carinate nonpasserines.Nevertheless, the CRAWFORD, E. C., AND K. SCHMIDT-NIELSEN.1967. intermediate basal Vo, of tinamous is consistentwith Temperature regulation and evaporative cooling the phyletically-correlated differencesin basal 00, of in the . Am. J. Phvsiol. 212:347-353. ratites and carinatenonpasserines (Calder and Dawson FARNER,D. S., N. CHIVEVS,AND T. RINEY. 1956. The 1978, Withers 1983) and the phylogeneticposition of body temperatureof North Island Kiwis. Emu 56: tinamous as nonratite but palaeognathouscarinates 199-206. (Cracraft 1981). KING, J. R., AND D. S. FARNER. 1961. Energy me- tabolism, and body tempera- We are grateful to the Washington State Department ture. In A. J. Marshall [ed.], Biology and com- of Fisheriesand Wildlife for donation of the tinamous. parative physiology of birds. Vol. 2. Academic We thank W. W. Weathers, an anonymous reviewer, Press, New York. and S. S. Hillman for critical comments on the manu- PARRISH,0. O., ANDT. W. PUTNAM. 1977. Equations script. Funding for this study was provided by a Port- for the determination of humidity from dew-point land StateUniversity Researchand PublicationsGrant and psychrometric data. NASA Tech. Note D- to PCW. 8401. LITERATURE CITED WEATHERS,W. W. 1979. Climatic adaptation in avi- an standard metabolic rate. Oecologia 42:81-89. ASCHOFF,J. 1981. Thermal conductancein mammals WITHERS.P. C. 1977. Measurement of 60,. VCO, and birds: its dependence on body size and cir- and ‘evaporative water loss with a flow-through cadian phase.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A. Comp. mask. J. Appl. Physiol. Resp. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 69:61 I-619. Physiol. 42:120-123. ASCHOFF,J., AND H. POHL. 1970. Rhythmic varia- WITHERS,P. C. 1983. Energy, water and solute bal- tions in energy metabolism. Fed. Proc. 29: 154l- anceof the ostrichStruthio camelus.Physiol. Zool. 1552. 56:568-579. CALDER,W. A., AND T. J. DAWSON. 1978. Resting ZAR, J. H. 1984. Biostatisticalanalysis. Prentice-Hall, metabolic rates of ratite birds: the Kiwis and the Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

The Condor 891426-430 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1987

WINTER DIETS OF COMMON MURRES AND MARBLED MURRELETS IN KACHEMAK BAY, ALASKA’

GERALDA. SANGER U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,Alaska Fish and Wildrife ResearchCenter, Anchorage, AK 99503

Key words: Common Murre; Marbled Murrelet; North Sea (Blake 1984), and for Marbled Murrelets foraging habitat: mysids;euphausiids; pandalidshrimp; (Brachyramphusmarmoratus) from British Columbia capelin;Pa&c sand lance. (Munro and Clemens 1931, Carter 1984) and Kodiak (Krasnow and Sanger 1986). This paper summarizes Knowledge of the winter diets of seabirdsin high lat- the diets of these two ,as observed during the itudes like Alaskan waters has been an elusive aspect winter seasonof 1977-l 978 in Kachemak Bay, Alaska, of their biology. Scanty information on winter diets of as a uart of the Alaskan Outer Continental Shelf En- Common M&-es (Uris aalge) are available from the vironmental Assessment Program, OCSEAP (Sanger Pribilof Islands fPreble and McAtee 1923). California and Jones 1982; Krasnow and Sanger 1986; Fukuya- (Baltz and Morejohn 1977) Kodiak Island (Krasnow ma, Sanger,and Hironaka, unpubl.) and provides fur- and Sanger 1986) Newfoundland (Tuck 1960) and the ther interpretation of the data. STUDY AREA I Received 27 May 1986. Final acceptance25 No- Kachemak Bay (Fig. 1) is a highly productive embay- vember 1986. ment located near the mouth of Cook Inlet in the ex-