Sustainable Urban Transport Master Plan City of Windhoek

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainable Urban Transport Master Plan City of Windhoek Sustainable Urban Transport Master Plan City of Windhoek Final - Main Report 1 Master Plan of City of Windhoek including Rehoboth, Okahandja and Hosea Kutako International Airport The responsibility of the project and its implementation lies with the Ministry of Works and Transport and the City of Windhoek Project Team: 1. Ministry of Works and Transport Cedric Limbo Consultancy services provided by Angeline Simana- Paulo Damien Mabengo Chris Fikunawa 2. City of Windhoek Ludwig Narib George Mujiwa Mayumbelo Clarence Rupingena Browny Mutrifa Horst Lisse Adam Eiseb 3. Polytechnic of Namibia 4. GIZ in consortium with Prof. Dr. Heinrich Semar Frederik Strompen Gregor Schmorl Immanuel Shipanga 5. Consulting Team Dipl.-Volksw. Angelika Zwicky Dr. Kenneth Odero Dr. Niklas Sieber James Scheepers Jaco de Vries Adri van de Wetering Dr. Carsten Schürmann, Prof. Dr. Werner Rothengatter Roloef Wittink Dipl.-Ing. Olaf Scholtz-Knobloch Dr. Carsten Simonis Editors: Fatima Heidersbach, Frederik Strompen Contact: Cedric Limbo Ministry of Works and Transport Head Office Building 6719 Bell St Snyman Circle Windhoek Clarence Rupingena City of Windhoek Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH P.O Box 8016 Windhoek,Namibia, www.sutp.org Cover photo: F Strompen, Young Designers Advertising Layout: Frederik Strompen Windhoek, 15/05/2013 2 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 15 1.1. Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 15 1.2. Background of the Master Plan ........................................................................................................ 16 1.3. Stakeholder Engagement Process ................................................................................................... 18 1.4. Implementation Process .................................................................................................................. 21 1.5. Report Format ................................................................................................................................ 23 2 Existing and Future Conditions ................................................................................................................ 24 2.1. Existing Land-use and Actual Structure Plan ..................................................................................... 24 2.2. Existing Transportation Systems and Characteristics ......................................................................... 30 2.2.1 Urban Road Infrastructure ........................................................................................................... 30 2.2.2 Existing Public Transport Infrastructure - Bus and Rail ................................................................... 31 2.2.3 Existing Public Transport System by Taxi ..................................................................................... 34 2.2.4 Overall Urban Mobility and Traffic Patterns in the Windhoek Area ................................................... 35 2.3. Existing Pedestrian and Cycling Facilities ......................................................................................... 37 2.4. Existing Transportation Demands .................................................................................................... 39 2.4.1 Data for model update ................................................................................................................ 41 2.4.2 O/D Matrix Development and Up-date .......................................................................................... 46 2.4.3 Model Validation ......................................................................................................................... 46 2.4.4 Reference 2012 Scenario Results ................................................................................................ 47 2.5. Population and Employment Forecasts ............................................................................................. 50 2.5.1 Framework Data ......................................................................................................................... 50 2.5.2 Land Use Scenarios ................................................................................................................... 52 2.5.3 Population forecasts ................................................................................................................... 54 2.5.4 Employment Forecasts ............................................................................................................... 56 2.5.5 Schools Forecasts ...................................................................................................................... 58 2.6. Projected Transportation Demands .................................................................................................. 58 2.7. Screenline Capacity and Network Deficiencies .................................................................................. 62 2.8. Traffic Safety ................................................................................................................................. 67 2.9. Other Deficiencies and current legal and institutional discussions ....................................................... 72 3 Strategic Direction .................................................................................................................................. 75 3.1. Developing the Strategic Direction ................................................................................................... 75 3.2. Reference to National Strategies and Master Plans and other Studies ................................................. 76 3.3. Identification of Strategic Directions Scenarios .................................................................................. 77 3 3.4. Selection of the Preferred Strategic Direction .................................................................................... 77 3.5. Making Sustainable Transport Attractive ........................................................................................... 78 4 Institutional and Legislative Framework .................................................................................................... 82 4.1. Existing Institutional Setting ............................................................................................................. 82 4.2. Legislative and Regulative Basis ...................................................................................................... 86 4.3. General Policies in the Transport Sector ........................................................................................... 91 4.4. Conflicts of Interest and Deficiencies ................................................................................................ 94 4.4.1 Weak legislative and regulatory frameworks ..................................................................................... 94 4.4.2 Low implementation capacity ........................................................................................................... 95 4.4.3 Poor quality public service delivery .................................................................................................. 96 4.5 Institutional Development .......................................................................................................... 96 4.5.1 Intergovernmental Special Commission for Sustainable Transportation ........................................... 98 4.5.2 Commercialisation of Public Transportation .................................................................................. 99 4.5.3 National Transport Agency ........................................................................................................ 101 4.5.4 Capacity Strengthening of Relevant Existing Entities ................................................................... 104 4.6 Law Enforcement ...................................................................................................................... 106 4.7 Development of Legislation and Regulation ............................................................................. 107 5 Public Transport ................................................................................................................................... 108 5.1. Strategy ....................................................................................................................................... 108 5.2. Recommended Innovations ........................................................................................................... 109 5.2.1 General notes .................................................................................................................... 109 5.2.2 Graduated network with mainly fixed lines .................................................................................. 110 5.3. Options for rail for meeting transport requirements .......................................................................... 116 5.3.1. General remarks and condition of railway infrastructure ........................................................... 116 5.3.2. Railway option to the neighboring cities .................................................................................. 117 5.3.3. Railway option for commuter trains in Windhoek
Recommended publications
  • GUIDE to CIVIL SOCIETY in NAMIBIA 3Rd Edition
    GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA GUIDE TO 3Rd Edition 3Rd Compiled by Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono and Naita Marowa PJ Rejoice Compiled by GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA 3rd Edition AN OVERVIEW OF THE MANDATE AND ACTIVITIES OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS IN NAMIBIA Compiled by Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA COMPILED BY: Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono PUBLISHED BY: Namibia Institute for Democracy FUNDED BY: Hanns Seidel Foundation Namibia COPYRIGHT: 2018 Namibia Institute for Democracy. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means electronical or mechanical including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission of the publisher. DESIGN AND LAYOUT: K22 Communications/Afterschool PRINTED BY : John Meinert Printing ISBN: 978-99916-865-5-4 PHYSICAL ADDRESS House of Democracy 70-72 Dr. Frans Indongo Street Windhoek West P.O. Box 11956, Klein Windhoek Windhoek, Namibia EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.nid.org.na You may forward the completed questionnaire at the end of this guide to NID or contact NID for inclusion in possible future editions of this guide Foreword A vibrant civil society is the cornerstone of educated, safe, clean, involved and spiritually each community and of our Democracy. uplifted. Namibia’s constitution gives us, the citizens and inhabitants, the freedom and mandate CSOs spearheaded Namibia’s Independence to get involved in our governing process. process. As watchdogs we hold our elected The 3rd Edition of the Guide to Civil Society representatives accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • Windhoek, Namibia Casenote
    Transforming Urban Transport – The Role of Political Leadership TUT-POL Sub-Saharan Africa Final Report October 2019 Case Note: Windhoek, Namibia Lead Author: Henna Mahmood Harvard University Graduate School of Design 1 Acknowledgments This research was conducted with the support of the Volvo Foundation for Research and Education. Principal Investigator: Diane Davis Senior Research Associate: Lily Song Research Coordinator: Devanne Brookins Research Assistants: Asad Jan, Stefano Trevisan, Henna Mahmood, Sarah Zou 2 WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA NAMIBIA Population: 2,533,224 (as of July 2018) Population Growth Rate: 1.91% (2018) Median Age: 21.4 GDP: USD$29.6 billion (2017 est.) GDP Per Capita: USD$11,200 (2017 est.) City of Intervention: Windhoek Urban Population: 50% of total population (2018) Urbanization Rate: 4.2% annual rate of change (2015- 2020 est.) Land Area: 910,768 sq km Total Roadways: 48,327 km (2014) Source: CIA Factbook I. POLITICS & GOVERNANCE A. Multi-Scalar Governance Following a 25-year war, Namibia gained independence from South Africa in 1990 under the rule of the South West Africa People’s Organization (SWAPO). Since then, SWAPO has held the presidency, prime minister’s office, the national assembly, and most local and regional councils by a large majority. While opposition parties are active (there are over ten groups), they remain weak and fragmented, with most significant political differences negotiated within SWAPO. The constitution and other legislation dating to the early 1990s emphasize the role of regional and local councils – and since 1998, the government has been engaged in efforts to support decentralization of power.1 However, all levels are connected by SWAPO (through common membership), so power remains effectively centralized.
    [Show full text]
  • Deconstructing Windhoek: the Urban Morphology of a Post-Apartheid City
    No. 111 DECONSTRUCTING WINDHOEK: THE URBAN MORPHOLOGY OF A POST-APARTHEID CITY Fatima Friedman August 2000 Working Paper No. 111 DECONSTRUCTING WINDHOEK: THE URBAN MORPHOLOGY OF A POST-APARTHEID CITY Fatima Friedman August 2000 DECONSTRUCTING WINDHOEK: THE URBAN MORPHOLOGY OF A POST-APARTHEID CITY Contents PREFACE 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 2. WINDHOEK CONTEXTUALISED ....................................................................... 2 2.1 Colonising the City ......................................................................................... 3 2.2 The Apartheid Legacy in an Independent Windhoek ..................................... 7 2.2.1 "People There Don't Even Know What Poverty Is" .............................. 8 2.2.2 "They Have a Different Culture and Lifestyle" ...................................... 10 3. ON SEGREGATION AND EXCLUSION: A WINDHOEK PROBLEMATIC ........ 11 3.1 Re-Segregating Windhoek ............................................................................. 12 3.2 Race vs. Socio-Economics: Two Sides of the Segragation Coin ................... 13 3.3 Problematising De/Segregation ...................................................................... 16 3.3.1 Segregation and the Excluders ............................................................. 16 3.3.2 Segregation and the Excluded: Beyond Desegregation ....................... 17 4. SUBURBANISING WINDHOEK: TOWARDS GREATER INTEGRATION? ....... 19 4.1 The Municipality's
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy in Primary Health Care in Namibia: Findings and Implications
    Cardiovasc Drugs Ther DOI 10.1007/s10557-017-6756-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Assessing Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy in Primary Health Care in Namibia: Findings and Implications M. M. Nashilongo1 & B. Singu1 & F. Kalemeera1 & M. Mubita1 & E. Naikaku1 & A. Baker2 & A. Ferrario3 & B. Godman2,4,5 & L. Achieng6 & D. Kibuule1 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract variance. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.695. None of the 120 Introduction Namibia has the highest burden and incidence of patients had perfect adherence to antihypertensive therapy, hypertension in sub-Sahara Africa. Though non-adherence to and less than half had acceptable levels of adherence antihypertensive therapy is an important cardiovascular risk (≥ 80%). The mean adherence level was 76.7 ± 8.1%. factor, little is known about potential ways to improve adher- Three quarters of patients ever missed their scheduled ence in Namibia following universal access. The objective of clinic appointment. Having a family support system this study is to validate the Hill-Bone compliance scale and (OR = 5.4, 95% CI 1.687–27.6, p = 0.045) and attendance determine the level and predictors of adherence to antihyper- of follow-up visits (OR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.1–8.7, p =0.03) tensive treatment in primary health care settings in sub-urban were significant predictors of adherence. Having HIV/ townships of Windhoek, Namibia. AIDs did not lower adherence. Methods Reliability was determined by Cronbach’s alpha. Conclusions The modified Namibian version of the Hill- Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to assess con- Bone scale is reliable and valid for assessing adherence to struct validity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor Muesee Kazapua Also Said Yesterday That Madikizela-Mandela Deserves a Street to Be Named After Her
    11111 Media Monitoring on Urban Development in Namibia Media Monitoring on Urban Development in Namibia is a service provided by Development Workshop Namibia (DWN), a Namibian NGO with a focus on sustainable urban development and poverty reduction. DWN is part of a world-wide network of Development Workshop (DW) organisations with centres in Canada, Angola and France, and offices in Vietnam and Burkino Faso. It was founded in the 1970s by three architect students in the UK and has been funded by non- governmental organisations, private citizens, and national and international development organisations. In Namibia, DWN’s activities focus on urban related research, effective urban planning for the urban poor, solutions to informal settlements, water & sanitation, and projects specifically targeting disadvantaged segments of the urban youth. Through 40 years of engagement on urban issues mainly in Africa and Asia, the DW network of organisations has acquired significant institutional knowledge and capacity and is well integrated in regional and international networks. The Namibian media provide an important source of information on urban development processes in the country, highlighting current events, opportunities and challenges. The media further provide insight into the different views and perceptions of a variety of actors, be it from government, non- government, private sector, and individuals that reside in Namibia’s towns and settlements. It is therefore hoped that DWN’s Media Monitoring service will provide insights into those different views, with potential use for a variety of institutions and decision-makers that work in the urban environment in Namibia. The Media Monitoring service is currently provided on a monthly basis and monitors the following newspapers: The Namibian, Republikein, Namibian Sun, New Era, Windhoek Observer, Confidente, and Informante.
    [Show full text]
  • A74 City of Whk Annual Report
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABREVIATIONS 4 COUNCIL STRUCTURE 2017/18 5 OFFICE OF THE CEO 3 CITY POLICE (CIP) 51 MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR 6 Theme 1: Governance 51 Public Safety and Security - Crime Rate 51 MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE Public Safety and Security - Road Safety 53 OFFICER 10 Public Safety and Security - Dedicated Municipal Court 55 OVERVIEW OF WINDHOEK 14 Public Safety and Security - By-laws 55 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION AND POPULATION 15 City Police: Funding Secured from Central City of Windhoek Political and Government 56 Socio-Economic Profle 15 Priorities for 2018/2019 56 Population Trends and Urbanisation 16 Environmental 17 URBAN AND TRANSPORT PLANNING (UTP) 58 Poverty Levels 17 Theme 1: Financial Sustainability 58 Building Plan Approval 58 INTRODUCTION 22 Land-use Management - Town Planning STRATEGIC INTENT 22 Applications 59 Vision Statement 23 Priorities for 2018/2019 60 Mission Statement 24 Values 24 STRATEGIC FUNDING (PUBLIC TRANSPORT) 60 Strategic Objectives 24 heme 1: Financial Sustainability 60 Key Performance Areas 24 Strategic Funding ( Public Transport - Key Performance Indicators 24 Acquisition of Busses) 60 Targets 25 Theme 2: Social Progression, Economic Corporate Scorecard 25 Advancement and infrastructure Council and Management Structure 30 Development 62 Public Transportation 62 ORGANISATIONAL OVERVIEW 31 Priorities for 2019/2019 63 Local Authorities Act (Act 23, 1992) 31 Update of Laws Exercise 34 ELECTRICITY (ELE) 65 Theme 1: Financial Sustainability 65 DEPARTMENTAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 35 Strategic Funding (Electrifcation)
    [Show full text]
  • Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2018
    Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2018 Final Report Prepared for Fredericton Transit Prepared by Stantec November 2018 Final Report Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2018 November 12, 2018 Prepared for: Fredericton Transit Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Transit Advisory TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEW 5 1.3 MARKET CONDITIONS 11 1.4 SYSTEM COMPARISON 26 1.5 ROUTE PERFORMANCE 35 2.0 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 40 2.1 STAKEHOLDER ACTIVITIES 40 2.2 PREVALENT THEMES AND CONCERNS 43 2.3 SURVEY RESULTS 44 3.0 GAPS ANALYSIS 56 3.1 SERVICE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 56 3.2 TECHNOLOGY 56 3.3 FARES 57 3.4 PARTNERSHIPS 58 3.5 MARKETING 59 3.6 FLEET 59 4.0 SERVICE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 61 4.1 CURRENT NETWORK 61 4.2 NORTH SIDE HUB EVALUATION 65 4.3 PARK-AND-RIDE EVALUATION 72 4.4 SUNDAY SERVICE EVALUATION 83 4.5 ROUTING EVALUATION 94 5.0 TECHNOLOGY 114 5.1 CURRENT TECHNOLOGY APPROACH 114 5.2 FUTURE TECHNOLOGY PROSPECTS 116 5.3 TECHNOLOGY RECOMMENDATIONS 122 6.0 FARES 127 6.1 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE 127 6.2 FARE PROSPECTS 135 6.3 FARE RECOMMENDATIONS 142 7.0 PARTNERSHIPS 147 7.1 CURRENT PARTNERSHIPS 147 7.2 PARTNERSHIP PROSPECTS 147 7.3 PARTNERSHIPS RECOMMENDATION 150 8.0 MARKETING 151 8.1 CURRENT MARKETING APPROACH 151 8.2 MARKETING PROSPECTS 154 8.3 MARKETING RECOMMENDATIONS 160 9.0 FLEET 162 9.1 CURRENT FLEET 162 9.2 FLEET PROSPECTS 162 9.3 FLEET RECOMMENDATIONS 164 9.4 FACILITY CONSIDERATIONS 167 10.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 169 10.1 ABOUT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 169 10.2 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA RECOMMENDATIONS 174 11.0 MOVING FORWARD 175 11.1 SUMMARY OF SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (0-2 YEARS) 175 11.2 SUMMARY OF MEDIUM-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (3-5 YEARS) 177 11.3 SUMMARY OF LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (5+ YEARS) 179 12.0 APPENDICES 183 12.1 THE NORTH AMERICAN BUS MARKET 183 12.2 FREDERICTON TRANSIT SURVEY QUESTIONS 189 FIGURES Figure 1 City wards of Fredericton.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Windhoek Old Location
    Revisiting the Windhoek Old Location Henning Melber1 Abstract The Windhoek Old Location refers to what had been the South West African capital’s Main Lo- cation for the majority of black and so-called Colored people from the early 20th century until 1960. Their forced removal to the newly established township Katutura, initiated during the late 1950s, provoked resistance, popular demonstrations and escalated into violent clashes between the residents and the police. These resulted in the killing and wounding of many people on 10 December 1959. The Old Location since became a synonym for African unity in the face of the divisions imposed by apartheid. Based on hitherto unpublished archival documents, this article contributes to a not yet exist- ing social history of the Old Location during the 1950s. It reconstructs aspects of the daily life among the residents in at that time the biggest urban settlement among the colonized majority in South West Africa. It revisits and portraits a community, which among former residents evokes positive memories compared with the imposed new life in Katutura and thereby also contributed to a post-colonial heroic narrative, which integrates the resistance in the Old Location into the patriotic history of the anti-colonial liberation movement in government since Independence. O Lord, help us who roam about. Help us who have been placed in Africa and have no dwelling place of our own. Give us back a dwelling place.2 The Old Location was the Main Location for most of the so-called non-white residents of Wind- hoek from the early 20th century until 1960, while a much smaller location also existed until 1961 in Klein Windhoek.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia After 26 Years
    On the other side of the picture are elements in the police and to devote their energies instead to making the force who are not neutral, or are trigger-happy, or are country ungovernable. Such lessons are more easily both. They may well be covert rightwingers trying to learnt than forgotten. Ungovernability down there, where sabotage reform. Other rightwingers seem set on making the necklace lies in wait for non-conformists, and the the mining town of Welkom a no-go area for Blacks. They incentive to learn has been largely lost, presents the ANC may not stop there. with a major problem. For Mr De Klerk it certainly makes his task of persuading Whites to accept a future in a non- More disturbing than any of this has been the resurrection racial democracy a thousand times more difficult. of the dreaded "necklace", surely one of the most despicable and dehumanising methods over conceived So what has to be done if what is threatening to become a for dealing with people you think might not be on your lost generation is to be saved, and if something like the side. The leaders of the liberation movement who failed, Namibian miracle is to be made to happen here? for whatever reason, to put a stop to this ghastly practice when it first reared its head amongst their supporters all People need to be given something they feel is important those years ago, may well live to rue that day. Only and constructive to do. What better than building a new Desmond Tutu and a few other brave individuals ever society? risked their own lives to stop it.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Perception of Windhoek's Drinking Water and Its Sustainable
    Public Perception of Windhoek’s Drinking Water and its Sustainable Future A detailed analysis of the public perception of water reclamation in Windhoek, Namibia By: Michael Boucher Tayeisha Jackson Isabella Mendoza Kelsey Snyder IQP: ULB-NAM1 Division: 41 PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF WINDHOEK’S DRINKING WATER AND ITS SUSTAINABLE FUTURE A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF WATER RECLAMATION IN WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA AN INTERACTIVE QUALIFYING PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE SPONSORING AGENCY: Department of Infrastructure, Water and Waste Management The City of Windhoek SUBMITTED TO: On-Site Liaison: Ferdi Brinkman, Chief Engineer Project Advisor: Ulrike Brisson, WPI Professor Project Co-advisor: Ingrid Shockey, WPI Professor SUBMITTED BY: ____________________________ Michael Boucher ____________________________ Tayeisha Jackson ____________________________ Isabella Mendoza ____________________________ Kelsey Snyder Abstract Due to ongoing water shortages and a swiftly growing population, the City of Windhoek must assess its water system for future demand. Our goal was to follow up on a previous study to determine the public perception of the treatment process and the water quality. The broader sample portrayed a lack of awareness of this process and its end product. We recommend the City of Windhoek develop educational campaigns that inform its citizens about the water reclamation process and its benefits. i Executive Summary Introduction and Background Namibia is among the most arid countries in southern Africa. Though it receives an average of 360mm of rainfall each year, 83 percent of this water evaporates immediately after rainfall. Another 14 percent goes towards vegetation, and 1 percent supplies the ground water in the region, thus leaving merely 2 percent for surface use.
    [Show full text]
  • S/87%' 6 August 1968 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
    UNITED NATIO Distr . GENERA1 S/87%' 6 August 1968 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH LETTER DATED 5 AUGTJST 1968 FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED NATIONS COUNCIL FOR NAMIBIA ADDRESSED TO 'THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL I have the honour to bring to your attention a message received by the Secretary-General from Mr, Clemens Kapuuo of Windhoek, Namibia, on 24 July lsi'48, stating that non-white Namibians were being forcibly removed from their homes in Windhoek to the new segregated area of Katutura, and requesting the Secretary- General to convene a meeting of the Security Council to consider the matter. According to the message, the deadline for their removal is 31 August 1968, after which date they would not be allowed to continue to live in their present areas of residence. On the same date the Secretary-General transmitted the message in a letter to the United Nations Council for Namibia as he felt that the Council might wish to give the matter urgent attention. A copy of the letter is attached herewith (annex I). The Council considered the matter at its 34th and 35th meetings, held on 25 July 1968 and 5 August 1968 respectively. According to information available to the Council (annex II), the question of the removal of non-whites from their homes in Windhoek to the segregated area 0-P IChtutura first arose in 1959 and was the subject of General Assembly resolution 1567 (XV) of 18 December 1960. At the aforementioned meetings, the Council concluded that the recent actions of the South African Government constitute further evidence of South Africa's continuing defiance of the authority of the United Nations and a further violation of General Assembly resolutions 2145 (XXI), 2248 (S-V), 2325 (XXII) and 2372 (XXII).
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Management Guide Supplement: Asset Category Overviews & Lifecycle Management Update
    Asset Management Guide Supplement: Asset Category Overviews & Lifecycle Management Update Original October 2012 Update September 2019 FTA Report No. 0138 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. UPDATED BY U.S. DOT Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Cambridge Systematics COVER PHOTO Image courtesy of U.S. Department of Transportation DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Asset Management Guide Supplement: Asset Category Overviews & Lifecycle Management Update SEPTEMBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0138 PREPARED BY Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, NY 11019 UPDATED BY U.S. DOT Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 55 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Cambridge Systematics 101 Station Landing, Suite 410 Medford, MA 02155 AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.transit.dot.gov/about/research-innovation FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i MetricMetric Conversion Conversion Table Table Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or "t") (or "metric ton") TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) 5 (F-32)/9 oF Fahrenheit Celsius oC or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION iv FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
    [Show full text]