History of Electronic Music

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of Electronic Music c ~. HISTORY OF ELECTRONIC MUSIC TEACHER UNIT GUIDE NOTES EARLY DEVELOPMENTS Telharmonium One of the first electronic instruments was built between 1897 and 1906 by Thaddeus Cahill (1867-1934). Called the Telharmonium, the instrument was an immense structure weighing about 200 tons and extremely expensive to produce. Itoccupied the entire floor of "Telharmonic Hall" in New York City for about twenty years, and a "portable" version took up thirty railroad boxcars. Itconsisted of a series of specially geared shafts connected to electric inductors (devices that produce electricity) which produced various alternating currents whose frequencies were set to match the desired pitches. The instrument was polyphonic (i.e., capable of playing multiple notes simultaneously) and was controlled by a set of velocity-sensitive keyboards. The actual sound was produced by a series of telephone receivers fitted with special acoustic horns. Cahill envisioned a plan to transmit music from the Telharmonium through the telephone network to hotels, restaurants, and private homes. Due to numerous difficulties the venture did not succeed. Although this visionary achievement in electronic music was soon largely forgotten, the design principles were later used in the Hammond Organ. His vision for transmitting music over phone lines has been realized with current technologies including "Muzak" and the internet. Theremin The Theremin was invented in 1919 by Leon Theremin (1896-1993) and remains popular in experimental and electronic music circles today. Developed in Russia, the first production model of the Theremin was introduced to the public at the Moscow Industrial Fair in 1920. A few companies still manufacture Theremins, including Big Briar, owned by Robert Moog (of the Moog synthesizer). Its design included two metal antennae: a horizontal loop to control volume and a vertical rod to control pitch. The instrument is played by moving one's hands in the air around the loop and the rod. The closer each hand gets to its antenna, the higher the pitch or the higher the volume. The sound output is a continuous monophonic tone that resembles a female voice or violin string sound. An excellent listening example can be found on the Beach Boys song, "Good Vibrations." Hammond Organ The Hammond Organ was invented by Laurens Hammond in 1935. Like the Telharmonium, it used mechanical means to create electric signals of various frequencies, but it was able to do so in a fairly compact instrument. Various timbres were achieved as the fundamental and up to eight harmonics were controlled by means of preset keys or manually through a series of drawbars. Each harmonic is added as its corresponding drawbar is pulled out. A Hammond console organ included two 61-key manuals (keyboards) and a 25-note pedal board. The lower manual is called the Great and the upper is the SwelL The Model B-3 Hammond Organ became very popular with jazz and rock groups in the 1970s (e.g., Chicago; Emerson, Lake and Palmer; Jimmy Smith). Musique Concrete Musique Concrete was an approach to music production developed primarily by Frenchmen Pierre Schaeffer and Pierre Henry in the late 1940s and 1950s. Their music was created by manipulation of recordings of natural acoustic sounds. Their early work was done on vinyl recordings, but when the tape recorder was developed, it proved to be a more flexible medium. Their techniques included changing tape speed or direction, tape looping, tape splicing, and addition of external electronic effects like filters or reverb. Many of the techniques that they pioneered are still used in one form or another in today's studios. Current examples include the 'rap' technique of "scratching" records, the use of pre-produced libraries of drum beat loops in 'house' music, and the 'remix technique of digitally rearranging and adding parts to an existing song. Early Electronic Music At the same time that the French were working with musique concrete, a studio in Germany was developing a different approach. Their goal was to create music by purely electronic means without the use of recorded sound. The most famous composer at this studio was Karlheinz Stockhausen. Many of the approaches and devices used in the German studio became the building blocks for the development of music synthesizers. Les Paul, Inventor of the Electric Guitar and Multitrack Recording The name Les Paul is probably most recognized for the electric guitar named after him. He designed and built the first solid body electric guitar in 1941, and in 1952 the Gibson Company agreed to produce and market the instrument. The Gibson "Les Paul" was the best-selling guitar in the world for many years and is still a popular choice for professional guitarists. In 1948, Capitol Records released a single consisting of two songs by Les PauL The record was the first to employ multitrack recording. Working in his home studio, Paul developed a way to synchronize eight separate tape recorders together. This allowed him to record multiple parts, one at a time, while listening to previously recorded tracks. Paul sold the design concept for the eight-track tape recorder in 1954, and by the late 1950s manufacturers were seriously marketing multitrack recording decks. The RCA Synthesizer The first true studio synthesizer, in the modern sense, was the RCA Synthesizer (Mark 1). Itwas introduced in 1955 and was also called the Olson-Belar sound synthesizer after it's inventors, Harry Olson and Herbert Belar. It was a large instrument (virtually filling the studio) and was a complete modular system that could generate, modify, process, record and play back complex sounds. Initially RCA had envisioned commercial applications for the instrument, hoping to use it to imitate traditional instruments for the purpose of popular music production. However, composers like Milton Babbitt, Otto Luening, and Vladimir Ussachevsky saw the potential for serious electronic and experimental music composition. This led to the establishment of the Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center in New York City. The RCA Mark 2 Synthesizer, an improved version of the instrument, was funded by RCA and installed at the Columbia-Princeton studio in 1959. Like its predecessor, it was a non-real-time instrument; that is, a performer could not simply sit down to play the instrument. The composer would encode each desired sound onto binary-coded paper tape. This tape would be fed into the synthesizer which would then interpret the coding and play the sounds. This was the first instrument that was actually called a "synthesizer" . THE AGE OF MODERN SYNTHESIS Moog Synthesizer With the arrival of the affordable transistor, a revolution in the design of electronic musical instruments began in the mid-1960s. The most important development of that period was Robert Moog's invention of the Moog Synthesizer. (The name Moog should be pronounced so that it rhymes with vogue.) Moog's approach was to take all of the modules that form the basic building blocks ofelectronic sound (oscillators, amplifiers, envelope generators, filters, etc.) and put them together into one box which was called a modular synthesizer. To create a sound, the synthesist would manually set the knobs of each module to the desired settings, and then would connect the modules together into various configurations using short wires called patch cords. (Each particular configuration was referred to as a "patch," and although patch cords are no longer used in synths, the term patch is still used to refer to a sound on a synth.) Once a patch was created, notes could be played from the keyboard in real time. The only way to remember a patch was to draw a diagram of the module settings and patch cord connections. (Not until the 1970s did synthesizers come pre-wired with typical configurations, allowing the user to store sounds and recall them instantaneously.) The instrument was monophonic; that is, it could only play one note at a time. The only way to create chords or polyphony was to make multiple passes (overdubs) on a multitrack tape recorder. A famous example of one such recording of the Moog Synthesizer is Wendy Carlos' S'witched-On Bach, recorded in 1968. With this innovative electronic interpretation ofJ. S. Bach's music, the word synthesizer quickly became a household word. The record was one of the fastest-selling classical albums at the time of its release and remains one of the best-selling electronic music recordings of all time. It generated an interest in synthesizers that soon led to their use in many genres of music. Digital Technology in an Analog World The components in the Moog Synthesizer were analog, voltage-controlled components. Through the 1970s, more and more synthesizers began using digital components. The difference between analog and digital is that analog allows for completely continuous change while digital, being based on numbers, changes by discrete steps. An example of analog is a clock with a sweep second hand. The hand moves continuously through all points between each second. A digital clock, on the other hand, displays time as a series of numbers, moving discretely from one second to the next with no steps in between. Another way to understand the difference between analog and digital is to think of a light fixture with two switches-a dimmer switch and a 3-way switch. The dimmer switch is analog- the amount of light is continuously adjustable. The 3­ way switch is digital-there are only three possibilities with no steps in between. Analog synthesizer components are capable of producing continuous electrical changes or fluctuations that are directly analogous to the audio signal. Digital components, on the other hand, store and retrieve information about a sound in the form of numbers. When an analog signalis digitized, the signal is quantized (rounded off) into discrete steps and stored as a series of numbers.
Recommended publications
  • Minimoog Model D Manual
    3 IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS WARNING - WHEN USING ELECTRIC PRODUCTS, THESE BASIC PRECAUTIONS SHOULD ALWAYS BE FOLLOWED. 1. Read all the instructions before using the product. 2. Do not use this product near water - for example, near a bathtub, washbowl, kitchen sink, in a wet basement, or near a swimming pool or the like. 3. This product, in combination with an amplifier and headphones or speakers, may be capable of producing sound levels that could cause permanent hearing loss. Do not operate for a long period of time at a high volume level or at a level that is uncomfortable. 4. The product should be located so that its location does not interfere with its proper ventilation. 5. The product should be located away from heat sources such as radiators, heat registers, or other products that produce heat. No naked flame sources (such as candles, lighters, etc.) should be placed near this product. Do not operate in direct sunlight. 6. The product should be connected to a power supply only of the type described in the operating instructions or as marked on the product. 7. The power supply cord of the product should be unplugged from the outlet when left unused for a long period of time or during lightning storms. 8. Care should be taken so that objects do not fall and liquids are not spilled into the enclosure through openings. There are no user serviceable parts inside. Refer all servicing to qualified personnel only. NOTE: This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a class B digital device, pursuant to part 15 of the FCC rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Konzerte, Klanginstallationen, Performances, Künstlergespräche, Filme, Workshops Concerts, Sound Installations, Performances, Artist Talks, Films, Workshops
    Biennale für Elektroakustische Musik und Klangkunst Biennial for Electroacoustic Music and Sound Art 28.9. – 1.10.2017 Konzerte, Klanginstallationen, Performances, Künstlergespräche, Filme, Workshops Concerts, Sound Installations, Performances, Artist Talks, Films, Workshops 1 KONTAKTE’17 28.9.–1.10.2017 Biennale für Elektroakustische Musik und Klangkunst Biennial for Electroacoustic Music and Sound Art Konzerte, Klanginstallationen, Performances, Künstlergespräche, Filme, Workshops Concerts, Sound Installations, Performances, Artist Talks, Films, Workshops KONTAKTE '17 INHALT 28. September bis 1. Oktober 2017 Akademie der Künste, Berlin Programmübersicht 9 Ein Festival des Studios für Elektroakustische Musik der Akademie der Künste A festival presented by the Studio for Electro­ acoustic Music of the Akademie der Künste Konzerte 10 Im Zusammenarbeit mit In collaboration with Installationen 48 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Elektroakustische Musik Berliner Künstlerprogramm des DAAD Forum 58 Universität der Künste Berlin Hochschule für Musik Hanns Eisler Berlin Technische Universität Berlin Ausstellung 62 Klangzeitort Helmholtz ­Zentrum Berlin Workshop 64 Ensemble ascolta Musik der Jahrhunderte, Stuttgart Institut für Elektronische Musik und Akustik der Kunstuniversität Graz Laboratorio Nacional de Música Electroacústica Biografien 66 de Cuba singuhr – projekte Partner 88 Heroines of Sound Lebenshilfe Berlin Deutschlandfunk Kultur Lageplan 92 France Culture Karten, Information 94 Studio für Elektroakustische Musik der Akademie der Künste Hanseatenweg 10, 10557 Berlin Fon: +49 (0) 30 ­ 20057­2236 www.adk.de/sem E­Mail: [email protected] KONTAKTE ’17 www.adk.de/kontakte17 #kontakte17 KONTAKTE’17 Die zwei Jahre, die seit der ersten Ausgabe von KONTAKTE im Jahr 2015 vergangen sind, waren für das Studio für Elektroakustische Musik eine ereignisreiche Zeit. Mitte 2015 erhielt das Studio eine großzügige Sachspende ausgesonderter Studiotechnik der Deut­ schen Telekom, die nach entsprechenden Planungs­ und Wartungsarbeiten seit 2016 neue Produktionsmöglichkeiten eröffnet.
    [Show full text]
  • Modular Synthesizers
    Modular Synthesizers A Brief History and Functional Description of the Modular Music Synthesizer • James Husted Synthwerks, LLC Sunday, March 24, 13 Mod•u•lar - adjective French modulaire or directly from Modern Latin modularis, from Latin modulus "a small measure" 1 : of, relating to, or based on a module or a modulus 2 : constructed with standardized units or dimensions for flexibility and variety in use, as in modular furniture 3 : composed of interchangeable units (!rst recorded 1936) Sunday, March 24, 13 Syn•the•sis - noun Etymology: Greek, from syntithenai to put together 1 : the composition or combination of parts or elements so as to form a whole 2 : the combining of often diverse conceptions into a coherent whole; also : the complex so formed Sunday, March 24, 13 Who’s on first? • 1837 - C.G. Page (Salem. Mass) - !rst to produce electronically generated sound (not necessarily associated with a musical instrument). • 1885 - Person and Ernst Lorenz -'Elektrisches Musikinstrument' - the !rst musical instrument designed to produce electrically generated sound. • 1897 - Taddaeus Cahills - Telharmonium - electromechanical instrument. • 1936 - Oskar Sala - Mixturtrautonium - !rst synth using Subharmonic synthesis • 1939 - Homer Dudley invents the Parallel Bandpass Vocoder (VODER) - A key operated speech synthesizer • 1940 - Homer Dudley invents the The Voder speech synthesizer as a way to transmit speech over telephone lines • 1948 - Hugh LeCaine - Electronic Sackbut - First voltage-controlled synthesizer • 1948 - Dr. Raymond Scott - Wall of Sound - First polyphonic Sequencing Workstation (electromechanical) and the Electronum - !rst sequencer. • 1950 - CSIR - Mk 1 - The !rst known use of a digital computer for the purpose playing music • 1956 - Louie and Bebe Barron - Produced the !rst all-electronic musical score for a major motion picture - MGM's 'Forbidden Planet' • 1957 - Max V.
    [Show full text]
  • Christina Perri 3
    MUSIC PRODUCTION GUIDE OFFICIAL NEWS GUIDE FROM YAMAHA & EASY SOUNDS FOR YAMAHA MUSIC PRODUCTION INSTRUMENTS 03|2015 Contents Interview Christina Perri 3 MOTIF Soundset „Air“ by DCP Productions 6 Yamaha Synth Book reloaded 8 VP1 Soundset for MOTIF XF / MOXF 11 MOTIF XS/XF/MOXF Exploring Sound: „Vintage Keyboards“ 15 MOTIF XF / MOXF Performance Soundset „Hybrid Performer“ Part 3 19 Yamaha DTX M12 Touch App 22 The new e-drum kit Yamaha DTX582k 24 CHRISTINA Yamaha KP100 Kick Pad 26 Sounds & Goodies 29 PERRI Imprint 43 DREAMS COME TRUE MUSIC PRODUCTION GUIDE 03|2015 CHRISTINA PERRI - DREAMS COME TRUE “Every time I dream something up, it’s so “I don’t take it lightly,” she says. “I tell everyone, ‘That’s small compared to what actually happens,” the moment my life changed.’ It was incredibly special.” says singer/songwriter Christina Perri. But even as her own life was changing, Perri was changing “Because what actually happens is just other people’s lives through her music. Just a year later, amazing.” her multi-platinum song, “A Thousand Years,” was As an unsigned artist, Christina once dreamed of making released as the second single from the soundtrack album a career out of performing and recording her deeply to The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1. It achieved personal yet pop-friendly songs. Then one day four years multi-platinum status, with a video that inspired romantic ago, one of her recordings was featured on the hit TV visions among countless Twilight fans. show So You Think You Can Dance, and suddenly she “I had dreamed of having a song on the Twilight stopped dreaming the dream—and began living it.
    [Show full text]
  • Analog Synthesizer So There Is No Need for Soldering.)
    Assembly time: Approximately 20 minutes (The electric circuit comes pre-assembled, Analog Synthesizer so there is no need for soldering.) How to Assemble and Use the Supplement Things you will need Parts in the Kit Phillips screwdriver (No. 1) AA alkaline batteries (4 new) Knobs (5) * Please note that rechargeable NiCd batteries and non-rechargeable Oxyride and nickel-based batteries should not be Washer head screws (7) used due to a high risk of components melting or fire breaking out with these batteries because of accidental short-circuiting or the like. Additionally, because this supplement was designed based on operation at 6 V, it may not operate in the desired way due to an excess of or a deficiency in voltage with the above batteries. Incidentally, most rechargeable batteries provide 1.2 V and Screws (3) Oxyride batteries, 1.7 V. Main unit Cellophane tape Notes for tightening screws The types of screws used for the supplement are those that carve grooves into the plastic as they are inserted (self-threading). The screwdriver most suited to tightening the screws is the #1 JIS screwdriver. When tightening screws, Circuit board firmly press the provided screwdriver straight against the screws and turn. It is said that 70 percent of the force applied is used for pushing against the screw and 30 percent for turning it. Precision screwdrivers are hard to turn, so use a small screwdriver with a grip diameter of about 2 cm. Electrode Slider panel Speaker Cut out the cardboard (Wrapped in cardboard.) case to use as a back cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Enter Title Here
    Integer-Based Wavetable Synthesis for Low-Computational Embedded Systems Ben Wright and Somsak Sukittanon University of Tennessee at Martin Department of Engineering Martin, TN USA [email protected], [email protected] Abstract— The evolution of digital music synthesis spans from discussed. Section B will discuss the mathematics explaining tried-and-true frequency modulation to string modeling with the components of the wavetables. Part II will examine the neural networks. This project begins from a wavetable basis. music theory used to derive the wavetables and the software The audio waveform was modeled as a superposition of formant implementation. Part III will cover the applied results. sinusoids at various frequencies relative to the fundamental frequency. Piano sounds were reverse-engineered to derive a B. Mathematics and Music Theory basis for the final formant structure, and used to create a Many periodic signals can be represented by a wavetable. The quality of reproduction hangs in a trade-off superposition of sinusoids, conventionally called Fourier between rich notes and sampling frequency. For low- series. Eigenfunction expansions, a superset of these, can computational systems, this calls for an approach that avoids represent solutions to partial differential equations (PDE) burdensome floating-point calculations. To speed up where Fourier series cannot. In these expansions, the calculations while preserving resolution, floating-point math was frequency of each wave (here called a formant) in the avoided entirely--all numbers involved are integral. The method was built into the Laser Piano. Along its 12-foot length are 24 superposition is a function of the properties of the string. This “keys,” each consisting of a laser aligned with a photoresistive is said merely to emphasize that the response of a plucked sensor connected to 8-bit MCU.
    [Show full text]
  • Hammond Sk1-73
    Originally printed in the October 2013 issue of Keyboard Magazine. Reprinted with the permission of the Publishers of Keyboard Maga- zine. Copyright 2008 NewBay Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Keyboard Magazine is a Music Player Network publication, 1111 Bayhill Dr., St. 125, San Bruno, CA 94066. T. 650.238.0300. Subscribe at www.musicplayer.com REVIEW SYNTH » CLONEWHEEL » VIRTUAL PIANO » STANDS » MASTERING » APP HAMMOND SK1-73 BY BRIAN HO HAMMOND’S SK SERIES HAS SET A NEW PORTABILITY STANDARD FOR DRAWBAR that you’re using for pianos, EPs, Clavs, strings, organs that also function as versatile stage keyboards in virtue of having a comple- and other sounds. ment of non-organ sounds that can be split and layered with the drawbar section. Even though there isn’t a button that causes Where the original SK1 had 61 keys and the SK2 added a second manual, the new the entire keyboard to play only the lower organ SK1-73 and SK1-88 aim for musicians looking for the same sonic capabilities in a part—useful if you want to switch between solo single-slab form factor that’s more akin to a stage piano. I got to use the 73-key and comping sounds without disturbing the sin- model on several gigs and was very pleased with its sound and performance. gle set of drawbars—I found a cool workaround. Simply create a “Favorite” (Hammond’s term for Keyboard Feel they’ll stand next to anything out there and not presets that save the entire state of the instru- I find that a 61-note keyboard is often too small leave you or the audience wanting for realism.
    [Show full text]
  • USING MICROPHONE ARRAYS to RECONSTRUCT MOVING SOUND SOURCES for AURALIZATION 1 Introduction
    USING MICROPHONE ARRAYS TO RECONSTRUCT MOVING SOUND SOURCES FOR AURALIZATION Fanyu Meng, Michael Vorlaender Institute of Technical Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, Germany {[email protected]) Abstract Microphone arrays are widely used for sound source characterization as well as for moving sound sources. Beamforming is one of the post processing methods to localize sound sources based on microphone array in order to create a color map (the so-called “acoustic camera”). The beamformer response lies on the array pattern, which is influenced by the array shape. Irregular arrays are able to avoid the spatial aliasing which causes grating lobes and degrades array performance to find the spatial positions of sources. With precise characteristics from the beamformer output, the sources can be reconstructed regarding not only spatial distribution but also spectra. Therefore, spectral modeling methods, e.g. spectral modeling synthesis (SMS) can be combined to the previous results to obtain source signals for auralization. In this paper, we design a spiral microphone array to obtain a specific frequency range and resolution. Besides, an unequal-spacing rectangular array is developed as well to compare the performance with the spiral array. Since the second array is separable, Kronecker Array Transform (KAT) can be used to accelerate the beamforming calculation. The beamforming output can be optimized by using deconvolution approach to remove the array response function which is convolved with source signals. With the reconstructed source spectrum generated from the deconvolved beamforming output, the source signal is synthesized separately from tonal and broadband components. Keywords: auralization, synthesizer, microphone arrays, beamforming, SMS PACS no.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 14 Street, Hudson, 715-386-8409 (3/16W)
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN THEATRE ORGAN SOCIETY NOVEMBER | DECEMBER 2010 ATOS NovDec 52-6 H.indd 1 10/14/10 7:08 PM ANNOUNCING A NEW DVD TEACHING TOOL Do you sit at a theatre organ confused by the stoprail? Do you know it’s better to leave the 8' Tibia OUT of the left hand? Stumped by how to add more to your intros and endings? John Ferguson and Friends The Art of Playing Theatre Organ Learn about arranging, registration, intros and endings. From the simple basics all the way to the Circle of 5ths. Artist instructors — Allen Organ artists Jonas Nordwall, Lyn Order now and recieve Larsen, Jelani Eddington and special guest Simon Gledhill. a special bonus DVD! Allen artist Walt Strony will produce a special DVD lesson based on YOUR questions and topics! (Strony DVD ships separately in 2011.) Jonas Nordwall Lyn Larsen Jelani Eddington Simon Gledhill Recorded at Octave Hall at the Allen Organ headquarters in Macungie, Pennsylvania on the 4-manual STR-4 theatre organ and the 3-manual LL324Q theatre organ. More than 5-1/2 hours of valuable information — a value of over $300. These are lessons you can play over and over again to enhance your ability to play the theatre organ. It’s just like having these five great artists teaching right in your living room! Four-DVD package plus a bonus DVD from five of the world’s greatest players! Yours for just $149 plus $7 shipping. Order now using the insert or Marketplace order form in this issue. Order by December 7th to receive in time for Christmas! ATOS NovDec 52-6 H.indd 2 10/14/10 7:08 PM THEATRE ORGAN NOVEMBER | DECEMBER 2010 Volume 52 | Number 6 Macy’s Grand Court organ FEATURES DEPARTMENTS My First Convention: 4 Vox Humana Trevor Dodd 12 4 Ciphers Amateur Theatre 13 Organist Winner 5 President’s Message ATOS Summer 6 Directors’ Corner Youth Camp 14 7 Vox Pops London’s Musical 8 News & Notes Museum On the Cover: The former Lowell 20 Ayars Wurlitzer, now in Greek Hall, 10 Professional Perspectives Macy’s Center City, Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Developments 70'S
    Digital Developments 70’s - 80’s Hybrid Synthesis “GROOVE” • In 1967, Max Mathews and Richard Moore at Bell Labs began to develop Groove (Generated Realtime Operations on Voltage- Controlled Equipment) • In 1970, the Groove system was unveiled at a “Music and Technology” conference in Stockholm. • Groove was a hybrid system which used a Honeywell DDP224 computer to store manual actions (such as twisting knobs, playing a keyboard, etc.) These actions were stored and used to control analog synthesis components in realtime. • Composers Emmanuel Gent and Laurie Spiegel worked with GROOVE Details of GROOVE GROOVE System included: - 2 large disk storage units - a tape drive - an interface for the analog devices (12 8-bit and 2 12-bit converters) - A cathode ray display unit to show the composer a visual representation of the control instructions - Large array of analog components including 12 voltage-controlled oscillators, seven voltage-controlled amplifiers, and two voltage-controlled filters Programming language used: FORTRAN Benefits of the GROOVE System: - 1st digitally controlled realtime system - Musical parameters could be controlled over time (not note-oriented) - Was used to control images too: In 1974, Spiegel used the GROOVE system to implement the program VAMPIRE (Video and Music Program for Interactive, Realtime Exploration) • Laurie Spiegel at the GROOVE Console at Bell Labs (mid 70s) The 1st Digital Synthesizer “The Synclavier” • In 1972, composer Jon Appleton, the Founder and Director of the Bregman Electronic Music Studio at Dartmouth wanted to find a way to control a Moog synthesizer with a computer • He raised this idea to Sydney Alonso, a professor of Engineering at Dartmouth and Cameron Jones, a student in music and computer science at Dartmouth.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct-To-Master Recording
    Direct-To-Master Recording J. I. Agnew S. Steldinger Magnetic Fidelity http://www.magneticfidelity.com info@magneticfidelity.com July 31, 2016 Abstract Direct-to-Master Recording is a method of recording sound, where the music is performed entirely live and captured directly onto the master medium. This is usually done entirely in the analog domain using either magnetic tape or a phonograph disk as the recording medium. The result is an intense and realistic sonic image of the performance with an outstandig dynamic range. 1 The evolution of sound tracks can now also be edited note by note to recording technology compile a solid performance that can be altered or \improved" at will. Sound recording technology has greatly evolved This technological progress has made it pos- since the 1940's, when Direct-To-Master record- sible for far less competent musicians to make ing was not actually something special, but more a more or less competent sounding album and like one of the few options for recording music. for washed out rock stars who, if all put in the This evolution has enabled us to do things that same room at the same time, would probably would be unthinkable in those early days, such as murder each other, to make an album together. multitrack recording, which allows different in- Or, at least almost together. This ability, how- struments to be recorded at different times, and ever, comes at a certain cost. The recording pro- mixed later to create what sounds like a perfor- cess has been broken up into several stages, per- mance by many instruments at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Reception Histories of the Telharmonium, the Theremin, And
    Electronic Musical Sounds and Material Culture: Early Reception Histories of the Telharmonium, the Theremin, and the Hammond Organ By Kelly Hiser A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Music) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2015 Date of final oral examination: 4/21/2015 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee ` Susan C. Cook, Professor, Professor, Musicology Pamela M. Potter, Professor, Professor, Musicology David Crook, Professor, Professor, Musicology Charles Dill, Professor, Professor, Musicology Ann Smart Martin, Professor, Professor, Art History i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii List of Figures iv Chapter 1 1 Introduction, Context, and Methods Chapter 2 29 29 The Telharmonium: Sonic Purity and Social Control Chapter 3 118 Early Theremin Practices: Performance, Marketing, and Reception History from the 1920s to the 1940s Chapter 4 198 “Real Organ Music”: The Federal Trade Commission and the Hammond Organ Chapter 5 275 Conclusion Bibliography 291 ii Acknowledgements My experience at the University of Wisconsin-Madison has been a rich and rewarding one, and I’m grateful for the institutional and personal support I received there. I was able to pursue and complete a PhD thanks to the financial support of numerous teaching and research assistant positions and a Mellon-Wisconsin Summer Fellowship. A Public Humanities Fellowship through the Center for the Humanities allowed me to actively participate in the Wisconsin Idea, bringing skills nurtured within the university walls to new and challenging work beyond them. As a result, I leave the university eager to explore how I might share this dissertation with both academic and public audiences.
    [Show full text]