Direct Dark Matter Searches - Present and Future -
Carmen Carmona-Benitez Pennsylvania State University
BLV2017, Case Western Reserve University, May 16, 2017 Dark Matter Evidence
Motion of galaxies and galaxy clusters
spiral galaxies Bulk of luminous matter v ~ const • data – bulge, disk & halo
v ~ r–1/2 – bulge & disk bulge disk Coma cluster
Dark Energy Dark Matter Cosmological Evidence (CMB, BAO, Supernovae…)
BAO (SDSS)
Ordinary 〈T〉= 2.725 K Matter Gravitational Lensing (weak/strong)
Kochanski, Dell’Antonio, Tyson Bullet Cluster
Carmen Carmona 2 Dark Matter Detection
χ χ indirect ?
SM SM
Indirect Detection (DM annihilation) PAMELA, ANTARES, Fermi, IceCube, MAGIC, CTA, AMS, HESS, VERITAS…
Carmen Carmona 3 Dark Matter Detection
χ χ indirect ? production SM SM
Accelerator Searches (DM production) LHC
Carmen Carmona 4 Dark Matter Detection
χ χ indirect ? production SM SM
direct
Direct Detection Different Technologies / Targets: NaI, Ge, Si, Ar, Xe, and many more…
Carmen Carmona 5 Dark Matter Detection
χ χ indirect ? production SM SM
direct
Direct Detection Different Technologies / Targets: NaI, Ge, Si, Ar, Xe, and many more…
Carmen Carmona 6 Detecting WIMPs
• WIMPs scatter elastically off nuclei ✦ Expect recoils O(10 keV) ✦ Expect < 1 event/100 kg/year • Backgrounds ✦ Gammas and electrons - scatter off atomic electrons (ER) ✦ Neutrons - also scatter off nuclei (NR) ✦ Neutrinos! new enemy. ER, NR. Can’t be shielded against
Er
Er
Signal: Nuclear Recoil Background: Electron Recoil (calibrate with neutrons)
Carmen Carmona 7 Direct Detection Techniques
Discrimination is crucial! • Use technology detecting TeO2, Al2O3, LiF, C 3F8 two signals • Or if one single signal, it Phonons/Heat should provide significant 10 meV/ph discrimination 100% energy
CaWO4, BGO Ge, Si
Xe, Ar, Ne Scintillation Ge, CS2, CF4 NaI Xe, Ar Ionization ~1 keV/� ~10 eV/e few % energy 20% energy
Carmen Carmona 8 Direct Detection Techniques
CUORE, COUPP, PICASSO, PICO
TeO2, Al2O3, LiF, C 3F8 Representative experiments, Phonons/Heat not meant to be completed 10 meV/ph 100% energy
CRESST CaWO4, BGO SuperCDMS ROSEBUD Ge, Si EDELWEISS
Xe, Ar, Ne Scintillation Ge, CS2, CF4 NaI Xe, Ar Ionization ~1 keV/� ~10 eV/e CoGeNT DEAP-3600 LUX 20% energy CLEAN few % energy CDEX LZ Malbek XMASS XENON DAMA, KIMS DAMIC PandaX DMTPC DM-Ice ArDM SABRE DRIFT DarkSide Darwin Carmen Carmona 9 Past, Present and Future trending
Carmen Carmona 10 Past, Present and Future trending
Carmen Carmona 11 Past, Present and Future trending
Carmen Carmona 12 Past, Present and Future trending
Carmen Carmona 13 Status of Field of Direct WIMP Detection
LUX is world leading experiment at most WIMP masses, as of this talk
SUSY-cMSSM (1�)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 021303 (2017)
Carmen Carmona 14 Where are we going?
Liq. Xe 2-phase Liq. Ar: 2-phase… DarkSide 1-phase… DEAP SuperCDMS Ge/Si CRESST CaWO4
LUX, Panda X II XENON 1T LZ/ XENON nT Liq. Xe 2-phase TPC
Carmen Carmona 15 And the Very Low Mass Picture!
CRESST II and CDMSlite world leading experiments at low mass!
CRESST-II 2015
CDMSlite 2015
Eur. Phys. J. C (2016) 76: 25
Carmen Carmona 16 Dual Phase Noble Liquid TPC
• Excellent 3D imaging capability ✦ Z position from S1 - S2 timing ✦ XY positions from S2 light pattern (charge) • charge / light ratio => Signal vs Background discrimination
Gamma Calibration (137Cs) (light) (S2/S1) 10 log Charge/Light XENON10 Neutron Calibration (AmBe)
Recoil Energy (S1+S2) [keV]
Carmen Carmona 17 The LUX Detector @ SURF
• 370 kg LXe TPC (total), 250 kg active region (active volume: 48 cm height, 47 cm diameter) • Water tank shielding (300 tons of water; all external backgrounds subdominant) • Xenon continuously recirculated to maintain purity (~250 kg/day) • Cooling system based on thermosyphons NIM. A 704, 111-126 (2013) • 122 low background PMTs (Hamamatsu R8778; U/Th ~9/3 mBq/PMT) arXiv:1211.3788 • Ultra-low background Ti cryostats (<0.2 mBq/kg)
2.75 m
3.50 m
1.20 m
@ Sanford Underground Research Facility, SURF (South Dakota, USA) Carmen Carmona 18 ER calibration with Tritiated-Methane
0 • ER calibration using CH3T injection • ER source in 0.1-18 keV energy range 50
• Absolute calibration of Q� and L� for 100
ER down to ~1 keV s)
ee µ 60 150 55 NEST v0.98 (2013) at 105 V/cm 50 NEST v0.98 (2013) at 180 V/cm 200
45 drift time ( 40 250 35 Light 30 LUX: Tritium at 105 V/cm 300 25 LUX: Tritium at 180 V/cm Light Yield (Photons/keV) 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2 15 radius squared (cm ) 10 601 2 5 10 20 5000 Energy (keV) Data 55 Tritium Beta 50 4000 45 3000 40 35 2000 30 Charge Count/(0.25 keV) 1000 25
20 0 ) Charge Yield (Electrons/keV)
15 σ 0 5 10 15 20 Charge Yield (e-/keV) Light Yield (ph/keV) Yield (ph/keV) Light Yield (e-/keV) Charge 4 Energy (KeV) 10 2 1 2 5 10 20 0 EnergyEnergy (keV) (keV) Phys.-2 Rev. D 93, 072009 (2016) -4
Frac Res. ( 0 5 10 15 20 Carmen Carmona Energy (keV) Feb, 201319 NR Calibration with a D-D Neutron Source
• Nuclear Recoil calibration using 2.45 MeV mono-energetic neutron beam Water from Tank D-D neutron generator • Neutrons are collimated by an air-filled pipe in the water tank Neutron Conduit
D-D neutron generator
Carmen Carmona 20 NR Calibration with a D-D Neutron Source
• Nuclear Recoil calibration using 2.45 MeV mono-energetic neutron beam Water from Tank D-D neutron generator • Neutrons are collimated by an air-filled pipe in the water tank Neutron Conduit
D-D neutron generator
“An Atomic Billiard Game”
NR1 ENR = En · µ · (1-cos(θ))/2
θ neutron
NR2
Carmen Carmona 21 NR Calibration with a D-D Neutron Source
• Nuclear Recoil calibration using 2.45 MeV mono-energetic neutron beam Water from Tank D-D neutron generator • Neutrons are collimated by an air-filled
- -e - pipe in the water tank e e- e e- θ - Neutron Conduit e e-
D-D neutron LXe generator
“An Atomic Billiard Game”
NR1 ENR = En · µ · (1-cos(θ))/2
θ neutron Drift time ( μ s)
NR2
y distance into LXe (cm) Carmen Carmona 22 LUX Absolute NR Calibration
• In-situ measurements! LUX analysis 1.1 keVnr cut-off ✦ S1 yield measured to 1.1 keV (assumes 0 yield below threshold via single scatters → conservative limits) ✦ S2 yield measured down to 0.7 keV via double scatters 10 S2 response • Fit to Lindhard model to get L(E): / keV)