DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Do Bats Use Olfactory Cues to Find Roosts?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Do Bats use Olfactory Cues to Find Roosts? Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bridget Kay Gladden Brown Graduate Program in Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University 2020 Thesis Committee Gerald G. Carter, Advisor Rachelle M. M. Adams Ian M. Hamilton 1 Copyrighted by Bridget Kay Gladden Brown 2020 2 Abstract Understanding how bats select roosts is crucial to their management and conservation. One way that bats can locate new roosts is by using cues from conspecifics. Research on this use of social information has mostly focused on conspecific calls. In many species, bats will move toward conspecific echolocation and social calls, which can help bats find new roosts faster. However, many roosts also have olfactory cues from guano and urine. Bat conservationists have long debated whether guano and urine can be used to attract bats to new roosts. If chemical cues can act as an effective bat lure, this would aid in efforts to exclude bats from buildings and attract them to artificial roosts in protected areas like state parks or wildlife preserves. In my thesis, I ask if bats use olfactory cues from guano and urine to locate potential roosts. In Chapter 1, I summarized research to date on the topic of the use of olfaction by roost-searching bats and I discuss reasons that bats might, or might not, use scent to locate roosts. From this research, results are consistent with the hypothesis that guano and urine are not strong enough lures to attract bats to new roosts. In Chapter 2, I describe experiments with three bat species given choices between a roosting area treated with guano and urine and an untreated control roosting area in captivity and in the field. This chapter describes experiments done by me (field experiments 1 and 2, captive experiments 4 and 6) and by other researchers (captive experiments 1, 2, 3, and 5). In field experiment 1 and 2, I used ii acoustic-based bat detectors to measure bat visits and nearby bat activity at paired treated and untreated artificial roosts for one week deployments at 16 sites in Panama (13 weeks) targeting velvety free-tailed bats (Molossus molossus) and at 7 sites in Ohio (17 weeks) targeting big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Only one visit was detected, and the activity did not show an effect of the treatment. In the captive experiments, I tested vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus) using paired roost tubes (n=5 bats), using surfaces with different improved test procedures (n=20, n =22, n =33), and using a y-maze that compared their scent response to that of sound cues or the combination of sound and scent cues. I also tested captive velvety free-tailed bats instead (n=18). The overall effect size of scent cues on roost selection by captive bats was near zero. Ultimately, this indicates that guano and urine are not a strong enough lure to consistently draw bats into a roosting area. Key Words: bats; multimodal; replication; roosting ecology; sensory ecology iii Dedication I would like to dedicate my thesis to my husband, Tyler Brown, who provided unconditional support and countless edits to my work during my thesis. iv Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my adviser, Dr. Gerald Carter, for his guidance and support during my master’s thesis. His knowledge and enthusiasm were a crucial resource for my master’s research. I would also like to thank the rest of my thesis committee, Dr. Ian Hamilton and Dr. Rachelle Adams, for their useful advice and constructive criticism. Besides my committee, I would also like to thank my field assistants, Jessica Nystrom, Jennifer Stancourt, and Morgan Little, for carrying out the field experiment in Ohio while I was in Panama for the summer. The preliminary experiments conducted that aided in the creation of my experiments were also done by other research interns. I would like to thank Lauren Leffer, Yesenia Valverde, Nia Toshkova for their contributions. Part of my project required the procurement of bat guano and knowledge of roosting sites, so I would like to thank the following people for their assistants with these aspects: The Ohio Wildlife Center, Columbus and Franklin County Metro Parks Staff (particularly Carrie Morrow), Lisa Cooper at NEOMED, and Jenna Kohles in Panama. While in Panama, I received assistance with mist-netting, resource acquisition and transportation from the Rachel Page Lab at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. I would like to extend my appreciation to the following people for being an unparalleled v resource while I was there: Dr. Rachel Page, Gregg Cohen, May Dixon, Alexis Heckley, Camila Santiago, and Sebastian Stockmaier. I also thank my fellow labmates at Ohio State, Imran Razik, Simon Ripperger, David Girbino, and Emma Kline, for their assistance in modifying ideas and plans, editing proposals and papers, and extra hands in the field. Finally, I would like to thank the organizations that provided financial support for me during my thesis: Sigma Xi Grants-in Aid of Research and Ohio State’s Critical Difference for Women Professional Development Grant. vi Vita Personal Information May 2012……………………………………………………..…Beavercreek High School December 2015…………………..…B.S. Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University 2016-2018………………………………………………..…...…..Bat Survey Coordinator, Ohio Division of Wildlife 2019-present……………………………….Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology vii Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... v Vita .................................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... x Chapter 1. Do Bats Use Scent to Find or Select Roosts? A Literature Review .................. 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 FUTURE RESEARCH AND FURTHER QUESTIONS ............................................. 14 Chapter 2. The Role of Scent Cues in Roost-Finding by Bats.......................................... 17 ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. 17 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 18 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 22 Ethics Statement........................................................................................................ 22 Panama Field Experiment ......................................................................................... 22 Ohio Field Experiment .............................................................................................. 25 Field experiment statistical analysis ......................................................................... 26 Captive Experiment One: Preliminary trials of bats choosing refuges (n=5 bats) ... 27 Captive Experiment Two: Zoo vampire bats (n=20) choosing sides ........................ 28 Captive Experiment Three: Wild-born and captive-born vampire bats (n=22) choosing sides ........................................................................................................... 29 Captive Experiment Four: Wild-born vampire bats (n=33) choosing sides ............. 30 Captive Experiment Five: A y-maze with acoustic cues, scent cues, and multimodal cues (n=45) ............................................................................................................... 32 Captive Experiment Six: Velvety free-tailed bats (n=18) choosing sides ................ 34 Captive experiment statistical analysis ..................................................................... 35 Comparing scent, sound and bimodal treatments in Captive Experiment Five ........ 35 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................... 36 Field Experiments ..................................................................................................... 36 viii Captive Experiments ................................................................................................. 38 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 43 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 46 Appendix A: Maps of Roost Locations for Field Experiments ........................................ 55 ix List of Figures Figure 2.1. Paired test boxes used in the field experiments. ............................................. 25 Figure 2.2. Test chambers for Captive Experiment One and Captive Experiment Two and Three. ...............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • First Records of Nyctalus Noctula Social Calls in Portugal

    First Records of Nyctalus Noctula Social Calls in Portugal

    Vespertilio 17: 37–44, 2014 ISSN 1213-6123 First records of Nyctalus noctula social calls in Portugal Paulo BARROS, Luís BRAZ, Hélia Marisa vale-Gonçalves & João Alexandre Cabral Laboratory of Applied Ecology, Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados 5000-801, Vila Real, Portugal; [email protected] Abstract. The common noctule (Nyctalus noctula) is a large and fast flying Palaearctic migratory bat. The range of the species distribution extends in longitude from the Iberian Peninsula to Japan and in latitude from North Africa to the southern part of the Scandinavian countries. However, in the southern part of its distribution range, most of the potential maternity colonies are unknown or found only spo- radically. This note presents the first records of N. noctula social calls in Portugal. In fact, two types of N. noctula socials calls (C1 and D1) were recorded and identified at a site in the Sabor river valley in northern Portugal, which are usually associated with mating roosts. Therefore, these new data may contribute to improve and update the knowledge of the location of potential new mating, swarming and hibernation sites, as well as of the mating season length and behavioural patterns of this migratory species throughout its European range. Nyctalus noctula, social calls, bat swarming, Portugal Introduction The common noctule, Nyctalus noctula (Schreber, 1774), is a large and fast flying Palaearctic bat, with broad rounded ears, rufous-brown fur, which is slightly darker on the dorsum, and has long narrow wings covered with short hair on the underside of the membrane close to the body (Dietz et al.
  • Bat Conservation 2021

    Bat Conservation 2021

    Bat Conservation Global evidence for the effects of interventions 2021 Edition Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson & John D. Altringham Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 2 © 2021 William J. Sutherland This document should be cited as: Berthinussen, A., Richardson O.C. and Altringham J.D. (2021) Bat Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions. Conservation Evidence Series Synopses. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Cover image: Leucistic lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros hibernating in a former water mill, Wales, UK. Credit: Thomas Kitching Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/ 3 Contents Advisory Board.................................................................................... 11 About the authors ............................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements ............................................................................. 13 1. About this book ........................................................... 14 1.1 The Conservation Evidence project ................................................................................. 14 1.2 The purpose of Conservation Evidence synopses ............................................................ 14 1.3 Who this synopsis is for ................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Background .....................................................................................................................
  • BAT Gljano and ITS FER­ TILIZING VALUE

    BAT Gljano and ITS FER­ TILIZING VALUE

    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN 180 BAT GlJANO AND ITS FER­ TILIZING VALUE l 'l ll '-~ lt•l' nf' 11 1on• 11111 11 a IIJ11II HII IId ltnl s 1111 a ,\ l l s:-t ttlll'l t' ll\' t' l't•lll ll g-. COLUMBIA, MISSOURI FEBRUARY, 1921 UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Experiment Station BOARD OF CONTROL THE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY H. J. BLANTON, JOHN H. BRADLEY, ]AS. E. GOODRICH, Paris Kennett Kansas City ADVISORY COUNCIL THE MISSOURI STA1"E BOARD OF AGRICULTURE OFFICERS OF THE STATION A. ROSS HILL. PH. D., LL. D., PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY F. B. MUMFORD, M. S., DIRECTOR STATION STAFF FEBRUARY, 1921 AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTRY RURAL LIFE C. R. Moui.TON, Ph. D. 0. R. JouNSON, A. M. L. D. HAIGH, Ph. D. S. D. GROMER, A. M. w. s. RITCHIE, A. M. R. C. HALT,, A. M. E. E. VANATTA, M. S? BEN H. FRAME, B. S. in Agr. R. M. SMITH A. M. FORESTRY T. E. FRIEDMANN, B. s. A. R. HALL, B. S. in Agr. FREDERICK D UNLAP, F. E. E. G. S!EVEKING, B. S. in Agr. G. W. YoRK, B. S. in Agr. HORTICULTURE c. F. AHMANN, .!J... B. V. R. GARDNER, M. S. A. H . D. HooKER, ]R., Ph. D. AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING J. T. RosA, ]R., M. S .. J. C. WooLEY, B .S. F. c. BRADFORD, M. s. MACK M. ]ONES, B. s. H. G. SWAR'rwou·r, B. S. in Agr.
  • Lista Patron Mamiferos

    Lista Patron Mamiferos

    NOMBRE EN ESPANOL NOMBRE CIENTIFICO NOMBRE EN INGLES ZARIGÜEYAS DIDELPHIDAE OPOSSUMS Zarigüeya Neotropical Didelphis marsupialis Common Opossum Zarigüeya Norteamericana Didelphis virginiana Virginia Opossum Zarigüeya Ocelada Philander opossum Gray Four-eyed Opossum Zarigüeya Acuática Chironectes minimus Water Opossum Zarigüeya Café Metachirus nudicaudatus Brown Four-eyed Opossum Zarigüeya Mexicana Marmosa mexicana Mexican Mouse Opossum Zarigüeya de la Mosquitia Micoureus alstoni Alston´s Mouse Opossum Zarigüeya Lanuda Caluromys derbianus Central American Woolly Opossum OSOS HORMIGUEROS MYRMECOPHAGIDAE ANTEATERS Hormiguero Gigante Myrmecophaga tridactyla Giant Anteater Tamandua Norteño Tamandua mexicana Northern Tamandua Hormiguero Sedoso Cyclopes didactylus Silky Anteater PEREZOSOS BRADYPODIDAE SLOTHS Perezoso Bigarfiado Choloepus hoffmanni Hoffmann’s Two-toed Sloth Perezoso Trigarfiado Bradypus variegatus Brown-throated Three-toed Sloth ARMADILLOS DASYPODIDAE ARMADILLOS Armadillo Centroamericano Cabassous centralis Northern Naked-tailed Armadillo Armadillo Común Dasypus novemcinctus Nine-banded Armadillo MUSARAÑAS SORICIDAE SHREWS Musaraña Americana Común Cryptotis parva Least Shrew MURCIELAGOS SAQUEROS EMBALLONURIDAE SAC-WINGED BATS Murciélago Narigudo Rhynchonycteris naso Proboscis Bat Bilistado Café Saccopteryx bilineata Greater White-lined Bat Bilistado Negruzco Saccopteryx leptura Lesser White-lined Bat Saquero Pelialborotado Centronycteris centralis Shaggy Bat Cariperro Mayor Peropteryx kappleri Greater Doglike Bat Cariperro Menor
  • Bat and Bridges Technical Bulletin (Hitchhiker Guide to Bat Roosts), California Department of Transportation, Sacramento CA

    Bat and Bridges Technical Bulletin (Hitchhiker Guide to Bat Roosts), California Department of Transportation, Sacramento CA

    Ct BBaatt aanndd BBrriiddggeess TTeecchhnniiccaall BBuulllleettiinn Hitch Hikers Guide to Bat Roosts Excerpts by California Department of Transportation In Cooperation with the California Department of Fish and Game December 2003 Citation: Erickson, Gregg A., et al. Bat and Bridges Technical Bulletin (Hitchhiker Guide to Bat Roosts), California Department of Transportation, Sacramento CA. 2002. Note: this document is a revised and abridged edition of Erickson, Gregg A., Pierson Elizabeth D., et al. Microchiropteran Bridge Utilization (Hitchhiker Guide to Bat Roosts), California Department of Transportation, Sacramento CA, 2000. Corresponding Author Gregg A. Erickson Office of Biological Studies & Technical Assistance 1120 N Street, MS27 Sacramento CA 95814 (916) 654-6296 (916) 753-7757 FAX email: [email protected] Acknowledgements This information contained in this report was made possible by the support of the California Department of Transportation, the California Department of Fish & Game, Dr. Elizabeth Pierson, Dr. William Rainey, Dr. Pat Brown, and experts in structural engineering and bat biology. Disclaimer: This document does not represent the policies or opinions of the California Department of Transportation. It is provided for informational purposes only. - 1 - Preface When species are cryptic and difficult to detect, their ecological significance may not be appreciated. They may be overlooked in the environmental assessment process and effects of our activities may not be adequately evaluated. This is especially true for species that are small, nocturnal, or do not announce themselves with bright colors or distinctive vocalizations--such is the case for the Microchiroptera. Similarly, the results of actions we take are not always apparent or well understood. Often, Microchiropteran response is subtle or occurs in a timeframe that makes detection difficult.
  • Common Vampire Bat Attacks on Humans in a Village of the Amazon Region of Brazil

    Common Vampire Bat Attacks on Humans in a Village of the Amazon Region of Brazil

    NOTA RESEARCH NOTE 1531 Common vampire bat attacks on humans in a village of the Amazon region of Brazil Agressões de morcegos hematófagos a pessoas em um povoado da região amazônica do Brasil Maria Cristina Schneider 1 Joan Aron 2 Carlos Santos-Burgoa 3 Wilson Uieda 4 Sílvia Ruiz-Velazco 5 1 Pan American Health Abstract Many people in Amazonian communities have reported bat bites in the last decade. Organization. Bites by vampire bats can potentially transmit rabies to humans. The objective of this study was 525 23rd Street NW, Washington, DC to analyze factors associated with bat biting in one of these communities. A cross-sectional sur- 20037-2895, U.S.A. vey was conducted in a village of gold miners in the Amazonian region of Brazil (160 inhabi- 2 Science Communication tants). Bats were captured near people’s houses and sent to a lab. Of 129 people interviewed, 41% Studies. 5457 Marsh Hawk Way, Columbia, had been attacked by a bat at least once, with 92% of the bites located on the lower limbs. A lo- MD 21045, U.S.A. gistic regression found that adults were bitten around four times more often than children (OR = 3 Instituto de Salud 3.75, CI 95%: 1.46-9.62, p = 0.036). Males were bitten more frequently than females (OR = 2.08, CI Ambiente y Trabajo. Cerrada del Convento 48-A, 95%: 0.90-4.76, p = 0.067). Nine Desmodus rotundus and three frugivorous bats were captured Tlalpan, DF 14420, México. and tested negative for rabies. The study suggests that, in an area of gold miners, common vam- 4 Departamento de Zoologia, pire bats are more likely to attack adults and males.
  • Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Grade Level Monument (PRIMNM) Through the Lens of Seabird Guano

    Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Grade Level Monument (PRIMNM) Through the Lens of Seabird Guano

    Pacific Marine National Monuments Pacific Remote Island Marine National Monument: Guano and Nutrient Cycling Source: NOAA Early Guano Advertising Poster Source: Activity Summary Duke Advertising Ephemera Collection This lesson introduces students to the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument (PRIMNM) through the lens of seabird guano. Students will orient Grade Level themselves using a mapping exercise to locate the islands within the PRIMNM. 7-12 Once oriented they explore nutrient flow through ecosystems by developing a food web for the sooty tern and use that to trace the movement of nutrients from Timeframe source (the ocean) to sink (islands). This concept will be further reinforced and 2.5 – 3 hours extended with a physical simulation exercise that introduces the variability of climate as a control on guano development. Students then use climate data from Materials their mapping exercise to make inferences about which islands within the Large blank paper PRIMNM are likely to have the best developed guano resources. Finally they use Colored pencils source data on seabird populations in the past to calculate rates of guano Sooty tern food web cards development to determine the sustainability of this resource. Sooty tern simulation cards Learning Objectives “Nutrients” paper/cotton balls Students will be able to: Containers for holding nutrients Explore the geography of the PRIMNM Understand the relationship between food webs and nutrient flows If you need assistance with this U.S. Department of Commerce | National
  • Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities

    Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities

    _______________ OCS Study BOEM 2013-01163 Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities Final Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs www.boem.gov OCS Study BOEM 2013-01163 Information Synthesis on the Potential for Bat Interactions with Offshore Wind Facilities Final Report Authors Steven K. Pelletier Kristian S. Omland Kristen S. Watrous Trevor S. Peterson Prepared under BOEM Contract M11PD00212 by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME 04086 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Herndon, VA Office of Renewable Energy Programs June 2013 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and Stantec Consulting Services Inc. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY The report may be downloaded from the boem.gov website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS). You will be able to obtain this report from BOEM or the National Technical Information Service. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Ocean Energy Management National Technical Information Service Office of Renewable Energy Programs 5285 Port Royal Road 381 Elden Street, HM-1328 Springfield, Virginia 22161 Herndon, VA 20170 Phone: (703) 605-6040 Fax: (703) 605-6900 Email: [email protected] CITATION Pelletier, S.K., K.
  • EU Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union

    EU Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union

    Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union 2018 – 2024 October 2018 Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union 2018 - 2024 EDITORS: BAROVA Sylvia (European Commission) & STREIT Andreas (UNEP/EUROBATS) COMPILERS: MARCHAIS Guillaume & THAURONT Marc (Ecosphère, France/The N2K Group) CONTRIBUTORS (in alphabetical order): BOYAN Petrov * (Bat Research & Conservation Centre, Bulgaria) DEKKER Jasja (Animal ecologist, Netherlands) ECOSPHERE: JUNG Lise, LOUTFI Emilie, NUNINGER Lise & ROUÉ Sébastien GAZARYAN Suren (EUROBATS) HAMIDOVIĆ Daniela (State Institute for Nature Protection, Croatia) JUSTE Javier (Spanish association for the study and conservation of bats, Spain) KADLEČÍK Ján (Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky, Slovakia) KYHERÖINEN Eeva-Maria (Finnish Museum of Natural History, Finland) HANMER Julia (Bat Conservation Trust, United Kingdom) LEIVITS Meelis (Environmental Agency of the Ministry of Environment, Estonia) MARNELl Ferdia (National Parks & Wildlife Service, Ireland) PETERMANN Ruth (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany) PETERSONS Gunărs (Latvia University of Agriculture, Latvia) PRESETNIK Primož (Centre for Cartography of Fauna and Flora, Slovenia) RAINHO Ana (Institute for the Nature and Forest Conservation, Portugal) REITER Guido (Foundation for the protection of our bats in Switzerland) RODRIGUES Luisa (Institute for the Nature and Forest Conservation, Portugal) RUSSO Danilo (University of Napoli Frederico II, Italy) SCHEMBRI
  • BATS of the Golfo Dulce Region, Costa Rica

    BATS of the Golfo Dulce Region, Costa Rica

    MURCIÉLAGOS de la región del Golfo Dulce, Puntarenas, Costa Rica BATS of the Golfo Dulce Region, Costa Rica 1 Elène Haave-Audet1,2, Gloriana Chaverri3,4, Doris Audet2, Manuel Sánchez1, Andrew Whitworth1 1Osa Conservation, 2University of Alberta, 3Universidad de Costa Rica, 4Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Photos: Doris Audet (DA), Joxerra Aihartza (JA), Gloriana Chaverri (GC), Sébastien Puechmaille (SP), Manuel Sánchez (MS). Map: Hellen Solís, Universidad de Costa Rica © Elène Haave-Audet [[email protected]] and other authors. Thanks to: Osa Conservation and the Bobolink Foundation. [fieldguides.fieldmuseum.org] [1209] version 1 11/2019 The Golfo Dulce region is comprised of old and secondary growth seasonally wet tropical forest. This guide includes representative species from all families encountered in the lowlands (< 400 masl), where ca. 75 species possibly occur. Species checklist for the region was compiled based on bat captures by the authors and from: Lista y distribución de murciélagos de Costa Rica. Rodríguez & Wilson (1999); The mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico. Reid (2012). Taxonomy according to Simmons (2005). La región del Golfo Dulce está compuesta de bosque estacionalmente húmedo primario y secundario. Esta guía incluye especies representativas de las familias presentes en las tierras bajas de la región (< de 400 m.s.n.m), donde se puede encontrar c. 75 especies. La lista de especies fue preparada con base en capturas de los autores y desde: Lista y distribución de murciélagos de Costa Rica. Rodríguez
  • Factors Affecting the Distribution of Pipistrellus Pipistrellus and Pipistrellus Pygmaeus in the Lothians Region, Scotland

    Factors Affecting the Distribution of Pipistrellus Pipistrellus and Pipistrellus Pygmaeus in the Lothians Region, Scotland

    BaTML Publications www.batml.org.uk Factors affecting the distribution of Pipistrellus pipistrellus and Pipistrellus pygmaeus in the Lothians region, Scotland Author: Sarah Clear* Dated: 1st November 2005 *Correspondence details: email: [email protected] Abstract Until recently it was believed that Bandit pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) and Soprano pipistrelle (P. pygmaeus) were one species, as such relatively little is known regarding factors that affect their distribution in the UK. The BATS and The Millennium Link project (BaTML) has been surveying different sites on the Union and Forth & Clyde Canals to assess use of these canals by bats. They found a higher incidence of Soprano pipistrelle relative to Bandit pipistrelle than expected. This paper reports on a study which aimed to determine whether the relative abundances of the two species of pipistrelle in woodland and parkland sites, away from the canal, are similar to the abundances found in the Union Canal area, and to determine what factors are affecting their distribution. Four non­canal sites were surveyed between July and September 2004. The data collected from these surveys was compared with four canal sites previously surveyed by BaTML. The results showed that Soprano pipistrelle was more numerous than Bandit pipistrelle at all of the non­canal sites, indicating a higher abundance of Soprano pipistrelle in the Lothian region. Key words: Bandit, pipistrelle, Soprano, bats, BaTML, Union, Forth & Clyde, canals, bat Introduction selection (Barlow, 1997; Russ & Montgomery, 2002) showing a greater preference for habitats Until recently it was believed that there was only a with water (Russo & Jones, 2003). Bandit single species of pipistrelle bat resident in Britain.
  • The Cause and Effect of Bat Wing Tears in Common Pipistrelle Bats (Pipistrellus Pipistrellus)

    The Cause and Effect of Bat Wing Tears in Common Pipistrelle Bats (Pipistrellus Pipistrellus)

    The Cause and Effect of Bat Wing Tears in Common Pipistrelle Bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) R O Khayat PhD 2019 The Cause and Effect of Bat Wing Tears in Common Pipistrelle Bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) Rana Osama S Khayat A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University 2019 i Abstract Bats represent a quarter of all mammalian species and play vital roles in many ecosystems. They are also are the only mammals capable of powered flight and have large, light, thin wings to enable flight. However, bats face many threats, including collisions with man-made structures, fungal infections and predator attacks, all of which can cause severe wing injuries. Hundreds of bats are admitted annually for care to treat torn and injured wings. This thesis aims to investigate the causes and effects of bat wing tears. In a series of studies, this thesis will: i) characterise wing tears in P. pipistrellus and other bat species in the UK; ii) explore the anatomy of the wing in P. pipistrellus, and see if knowledge of the anatomy is sufficient to understand wing tear placement and healing rates; iii) present a novel method for analysing flight from high-speed video data to assess the effect of tears on flight; and iv) develop a systematic forensic method to identify the presence of cat DNA on wing tears. Results from Chapter 2 indicate that most tears occurred in the Plagiopatagium wing section (section P), which is closest to the body.