DOCSLIB.ORG

The Denton Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Archaeological Report No. 4 THE DENTON SITE A Middle Archaic Occupation in the Northern Yazoo Basin, Mississippi by John M. Connaway with contributions by Samuel o. Brookes and Samuel O. McGahey Edited by Priscilla M. Lowrey and Clarence H. Webb Mississippi Department of Archives and History Jackson, Mississippi Elbert R. Hilliard, Director 1977 .. to. to. ... - CONTENTS PAGE List of Illustrations iv List of Tables .. vi Preface . vii Acknowledgements .. viii Introduction. ix i , Excavation. · · · . ·· · · 1 2. Floral-faunal Analysis. · ·· · 6 3. Artifacts and Raw Materials . · 7 Cores . · 7 Bifaces · . · · 10 Projectile· Points· · · · · · 24 Flake and Blade Tools · · 46 Heat-treating 59 Ground and Pecked· · Stones. 65 Lapidary Industry 75 Clay. · . · · · · 129 4. Radiocarbon· Dates · · · · · · · 137 5. Conclusions 139 References Cited. 141 ... - iii .. .. .. ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES PAGE 1. Cores. A-C, type A; D-F, type B 8 2. Cores. A-G, type C .-.-•..•• 9 3. Bifaces.- A-F, adzes; G, adze-chopper bits. 11 4. Bifaces. A-F, choppers; G-H, Baytown choppers. • 13 5. Bifaces. A-E, choppers with lamellar flaking; !-l, circular specimens-:- . • . • . 14 6. Bifaces. A-F, elongated; G-I, with concave bits..•.•.. 17 7. Beaks. A-L,-lateral view;-M~ anterior view ••••.••••• 19 8. Scrapers-and drills. A-E, hafted end scrapers; F-J, polished .. drills; K, drill with-heavy wear; L, experime~tal drill with heavy wear . • . • • . .-. • . • • • . • . • 21 9. Drills. A-N, types from surface collection; Q-R, excavated specimens. .'. • . • . • 22 10. Projectile points. ~-~, Denton 25 11. Projectile points. ~-Q, Denton 26 12. Projectile points. R-~, Denton 27 13. Projectile points. ~-!, Opossum Bayou; Q-~, Gary 29 14. Projectile points. ~-~, Pontchartrain; K-~, Kent. 31 15. Projectile points. A-G2, miscellaneous 34 .. 16. Projectile points. Hl-~, miscellaneous 37 17. Projectile points. Kl-M3, miscellaneous. 39 18. Projectile points. Nl-T5, miscellaneous. 42 19. Projectile points. Ul-Z5, miscellaneous.. 44 .. 20. Flake tools. ~-!, bifacially worked flakes; Q-~, saws; ~-~, denticulates • • • . • 51 21. Flake and blade tools. !-!' notches; Q-~, flakes with utilized .. side and end; !-Q, lamellar blades • . • • . 52 22. Flake and blade tools. A-C, flakes with utilized end; D, blade with utilized side; ~=!~ flakes with utilized side; I, blade- .. like flake with utilized side. • . • • 54 23. Type 1 perforators. A-K, bifacial; L-V, unifacial. • . 56 24. Type 2 perforators. A-G, bifacial; li-L, unifacial. • . 57 25. Ground and pecked stone-tools. !, grooved axe; ~-Q, celts. 66 26. Ground and pecked stone tools. ~-Q, celts. 68 27. Ground and pecked stone. A, discoidal; B, gorget; C, banner- stone preform; E.-;-~, banner'stones .. -:- .....- •....• 70 iv 28. Bannerstones. A-B, Pitchford Site; C-E, Campassi Site. .. 72 ... 29. Pecked stone tools. !-Q, pitted stones; ~, large pitted metate; !"-.Q., hammers tones; H, abrader. •. .... 74 30. Drilled pebbles. A-D, completely drilled;·· E-O, partially ... drilled -=- -=- -.-. 77 31. Beads. A-D, disc; E-F, round; G-N, tubular; O-Q, tubes; R-U, unique shapes; V-::X-; from "Denton Site B" .-.-....•-.-. 81 32. Preforms. !-~, sandstone-limonite fragments; ~-~, pebbles with smoo thed ends. • . .• 88 33. Preforms. !-~, sawed pebbles; !..-~, ground, undrilled pebbles. 91 34. Tools and beads. !-!, bead saws; f, Pitchford Site bead; Q, Norman Site pendant; ~, Longstreet Site bead; !..' Longstreet drilled pebble; G-H, pendants from mound near Mobile Bay, Alabama (photographs ~ and ~ courtesy of Nicholas H. Holmes and Thigpen Photography, Mobile, Alabama). .• 95 35. Zoomorphic effigies. A, MDAH turtle; B, Jones turtle; C, Alabama turtle (Courtesy of-Nicholas H. Holmes and Thigpen Photography, Mobile, Alabama); D, Lancaster bead; E, MDAH bead #1 • . .. 98 .. 36. Denton zoomorphic beads. F, M.S.U.; G, Jaeger #1; H, MDAH #2; I, Jaeger #2; J, Jaeger-#3; K, Mit~hell; L, MDAH #4; M, MDAH #3; N, MDAH #5;0, Jones ...- .....• -=- ..... -=- ... 103 .. 37. Beads from other sites. P, Stubblefield; Q, Carlton; ~, Freder­ ick; S, Crisler.. - 110 38. Ceramics. 130 39. Ceramics. • . • 132 40. Basketry-impressed clay objects. 134 FIGURES 1. Contour map of the Denton Site. • . 3 2. Vertical and Horizontal Profiles of Feature in Square 60N-40E 5 3. Zoomorphic beads. T, Scales; U, Woods; V, Parkman; W-Y, Law­ rence County objects; ~, Lower Jackson Mound frog~ ~ . .. 115 ... .. v TABLES PAGE 1. Reducation stages of spa11s...•.. 47 2. Utilization of spalla••.•.•••• 48 3. Comparison of perforator measurements. 58 4. Heat treating of surface and excavated 1ithics 61 5. Heat treating of spa11s. ..•.••• 63 6. Heat-treated spa11s by levels, Square 60N-40E• 64 .. vi .. PREFACE Recorded Archaic sites in the northern portion of the Yazoo Basin .. are scarce. Because until recently no archaeological investigations have taken place on such sites, there has been a prominent lack of knowledge and published data concerning Archaic cultures of the area. This report, consisting primarily of an assessment of the lithic tech­ nology at the Denton Site, is an effort to begin to remedy this situation. It is hoped that further studies will reveal more information about this and other aspects of life associated with the Middle Archaic Period of the northern Yazoo Basin floodplain. .. .. .. vii .. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author expresses appreciation to Mrs. J. E. Furr, the property owner, and to Hubert Haynes, who rents the farm, for their permission to excavate on the Denton Site. Special thanks go to J. T. Lancaster, Jr., for his financial assis­ tance in obtaining the first radiocarbon date from the site and for the loan of his artifact collection. The use of artifacts found by or in the possession of Burt Jaeger, Virge Edwards, Austin Adkins, T. F. Davis III, Tommy Mitchell, Jean Jones Firestone, J. T. Pitchford, Jr., Gerald Berry, Thomas D. Potts, and Bill Vowell is also greatly appre­ ciated. Permission from Nicholas Holmes to use some photographs of Alabama artifacts and the photographic work done by Thigpen Photography of Mobile, Alabama, and by Harold Smith of Photographic Ltd., Clarksdale, Mississippi, are also appreciated. Barbara J. McKinney gave welcome assistance in assembling the plates. The author also thanks Leonard W. Blake of the Missouri Botanical Garden and Betty Lee Brandau of the University of Georgia Geochronology Laboratory for their technical assistance. Clarence H. Webb, Samuel o. McGahey, and Samuel o. Brookes gave welcome advice and professional assistance. Finally, the author expresses his appreciation to Mrs. Philip R. Hogue, who painstakingly typed the final copy of this report for publica­ tion, and to Mike Johnson of the photodup1ication staff of the Mississippi Department of Archives and History, who operated the offset press and collator . .. .. .. viii ... lit ... ... INTRODUCTION ... The Denton Site is located on an old natural levee east of Opossum Bayou t near the town'of Lambert in Quitman CountYt Mississippi. The site was first reported by Phillipst Ford t and Griffin in 1951t but no cultural data were recorded other than two "mounds" (Phillipst Ford t ... and Griffin 1951:54). It was revisited by the writers of this report in 1969 during a survey of sites in Quitman t Coahomat and Tunica counties. The 6-to-8-acre site has been in cultivation for many years. In recent years the two "mounds t" formerly situated on two still-existing high knolls at the crest of the natural levee t were leveled t along with a portion of the knolls themselves. The "mounds" are referred to here ... with some reservation because their exact nature is unknown. In 1972 t Mississippi State University excavated a l2-foot-deep backhoe trench across the southernmost knoll. Stratigraphic layers of sterile sand and thin midden deposits indicated that the site had been occupied inter­ mittently between natural levee buildupst apparently for a long period of time. It is thus possible that the "mounds" could have been built at a later time by the occupants or that they could have been a continu­ ation of this intermittent levee and midden accumulation. The relative chronological data obtained from the excavation and surface collections, as well as the physiographic and stratigraphic evidence, indicate that ... the site was situated on the east bank of an old Ohio-Mississippi River meander and that at least some of the natural levee accumulation took place during its occupation. The light tan levee soil upon which occupational debris is found ... on the site is known as Dundee fine sandy loam (USDA 1958). A very dark black midden soil is evident within this area, on the east side of the southernmost knoll. In contrast t lower areas to the west and to ... the east down the backslope of the levee consist of a heavier soil known as Dowling clay or silty clay. No midden debris is found in these areas other than those artifacts carried in by erosion or cultivation. A low ridge extends from the southernmost knoll east-northeast across a cultivated field. Toward the opposite end of this ridge, about 300 yards out t a mound of Dundee soil approximately 4 feet high has scattered lithic debris and artifacts on the surface. The internal nature of the mound has not yet been investigated, and it is slowly dwindling under constant cultivation. Designated "Denton Site B," this mound will be referred to again in the discussion of the lapidary industry. ix Occupational debris is scattered along the natural levee from the southernmost knoll to a shallow gully approximately 300 yards to the north. From here, a slight ridge extends northeast about 100 yards, culminating in a low knoll of Dundee soil. Scattered lithic debris and projectile points have been found here, but" as yet no lapidary items. Surface collections from this area have been included in the general site collection, since there is no real break in debris scatter• .. x 1 EXCAVATION During the winter of 1969, when the author and Sam McGahey, archae­ ologists with the Mississippi Department of Archives and History, were engaged in a survey of sites endangered by land leveling, interested amateurs reported that the Denton Site was being bulldozed.
Recommended publications
  • I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover

    I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover

    I. A CONSIDERATION OF TINE AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRIJCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT MOUND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore 40 II. A CONSIDERATION OF TIME AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT 14)UND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore INTRODUCT ION In considering the subject of prehistoric earthmoving and the construction of monuments associated with it, there are many variables for which some sort of control must be achieved before any feasible demographic features related to the labor involved in such construction can be derived. Many of the variables that must be considered can be given support only through certain fundamental assumptions based upon observations of related extant phenomena. Many of these observations are contained in the ethnographic record of aboriginal cultures of the world whose activities and subsistence patterns are more closely related to the prehistoric cultures of a particular area. In other instances, support can be gathered from observations of current manual labor related to earth moving since the prehistoric constructions were accomplished manually by a human labor force. The material herein will present alternative ways of arriving at the represented phenomena. What is inherently important in considering these data is the element of cultural organization involved in such activities. One need only look at sites such as the Valley of the Kings and the great pyramids of Egypt, Teotihuacan, La Venta and Chichen Itza in Mexico, the Cahokia mound group in Illinois, and other such sites to realize that considerable time, effort and organization were required.
  • Archaeologist Volume 44 No

    Archaeologist Volume 44 No

    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 44 NO. 1 WINTER 1994 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first of January as follows: Regular membership $17.50; husband and wife (one copy of publication) $18.50; Life membership $300.00. EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in 1994 President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East the membership dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an incor­ Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 porated non-profit organization. 1994 Vice President Stephen J. Parker, 1859 Frank Drive, BACK ISSUES Lancaster, OH 43130, (614) 653-6642 1994 Exec. Sect. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: 43130, (614)653-9477 Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H SE, East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse.$20.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, 1980's& 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43068, (614) 861-0673 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1998 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, OH 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43064, (614)873-5471 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are gen­ 1994 Immediate Past Pres.
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site

    Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site

    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia

    2016 Athens, Georgia

    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
  • Paleoanthropology of the Balkans and Anatolia, Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0874-4 326 Index

    Paleoanthropology of the Balkans and Anatolia, Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0874-4 326 Index

    Index A Bajloni’s calotte BAJ, 17, 19–20 Accretion model of Neanderthal evolution, 29 Balanica Acculturation, 164–165, 253 BH-1, 15, 24–29, 309 Acheulean, 80, 148, 172, 177, 201, 205, 306, 308, 310 hominin, 15–17, 29 large flake, 129, 132, 218 Mala, vi, 16, 24, 30, 139–140, 144–145, lithic artifacts, 80 148, 309–311 Lower, 308 Velika, 24, 36, 139–140, 144–145, 148 Middle, 308 Balıtepe, 214, 223–224 Admixture, vi, 29, 258 Balkan, v, 3, 139, 159, 171, 187, 218, 229, 274, 282, 303 Neanderthal, 51–64 and Anatolia, 308–310 Adriatic, 46, 154, 157, 162, 164–166 Central, vi, 3, 15–30, 139–150 Aegean, 29–30, 74–76, 116, 119, 121–122, 134–135, 148, 213, implications for earliest settlement of Europe, 220–221, 261, 283, 305, 316 187–210 Aizanoi, 221 Mountains, 69, 187 Akçeşme, 214, 223–224 and neighbouring regions, 229–261 Aktaş, 214, 217 Peninsula, 51, 70, 74, 119, 134, 150, 187, 201, 208 Alluvial plain, 125, 314 Southern, 3, 12, 47, 275 Alykes, 270, 272 Bañolas mandible, 28 Amărăști, 176–177, 181 Basalt, 201, 217–218, 220, 284 Anatolia (Asia Minor), 3, 79–80, 308–310 Basins, 51, 74, 99, 119, 139, 213, 281, 303 Central (Region), 128, 132, 134, 213, 217–218, 220, 223, 313 Anagni, 306 Eastern (Region), 217 Apennine, 310, 314 and hominin dispersals, 213–225 Beni Fouda, 307 North, 120 Čačak-Kraljevo, 140 Southeastern (Region), 215, 217, 220, 223 Carpathian, 51, 148 west, 119, 121 Denizli, 83 Anatomically modern human, 23, 36, 41, 44, 46, 55–56, 62, 70, 72, evolution on archaeological distributions, 313–317 76, 95, 111, 153, 165–166, 229 Grevena, 269, 272 Apidima, 4, 7–8, 11–12, 96, 310–311 Kalloni, 121–122 Apolakkia, 270–271 Megalopolis, 9, 12, 134–135, 298 Apollonia, 74, 270, 273, 276–277, 286–287 Mygdonia, 12, 273 Arago, 10, 25, 29, 56, 59, 87–90, 149, 312 Niš, 139, 146 Archaeological pattern, 303, 305 Pannonian, 15, 23, 319 Areopolis, 97 Thessalian, 310 Asprochaliko, 95, 148, 238–239, 253, 260 Venosa, 306 Assimilation model, 162 Belen Tepe, 221–222, 225 Atapuerca, 28, 276, 285, 287, 312, 318 Benkovski, 187, 205–209, 309 Sima de los Huesos, 27–29, 304, 306–307 BH-1.
  • Program of the 75Th Anniversary Meeting

    Program of the 75Th Anniversary Meeting

    PROGRAM OF THE 75 TH ANNIVERSARY MEETING April 14−April 18, 2010 St. Louis, Missouri THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2010 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting 3 Contents 4............... Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5……….….2010 Award Recipients 10.................Maps of the America’s Center 12 ................Maps of Renaissance Grand St. Louis 14 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 15 .............. General Information 18. ............. Featured Sessions 20 .............. Summary Schedule 25 .............. A Word about the Sessions 27............... Program 161................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 167............... Presidents of SAA . 168............... Annual Meeting Sites 169............... Exhibit Map 170................Exhibitor Directory 180................SAA Committees and Task Forces 184………….Index of participants 4 Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting America’s Center APRIL 16, 2010 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2009 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W.
  • Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R

    Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1985 Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R. Polhemus University of Tennessee - Knoxville Recommended Citation Polhemus, Richard R., "Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6). " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1985. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3320 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Richard R. Polhemus entitled "Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6)." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald F. Schroedl, Jefferson Chapman Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Richard R. Polhemus entitled 11Mississippian Architecture: Temporal , Technolog ical, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site ( 40MR6) •11 I have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts , with a major in Anthropology.
  • A Spatial and Elemental Analyses of the Ceramic Assemblage at Mialoquo (40Mr3), an Overhill Cherokee Town in Monroe County, Tennessee

    A Spatial and Elemental Analyses of the Ceramic Assemblage at Mialoquo (40Mr3), an Overhill Cherokee Town in Monroe County, Tennessee

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2019 COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE Christian Allen University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Allen, Christian, "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5572 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Christian Allen entitled "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald Schroedl, Julie Reed Accepted for the Council: Dixie L.
  • Metate Re-Roughening, Pecking, Or Pounding?

    Metate Re-Roughening, Pecking, Or Pounding?

    PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A REPLICATNE STUDY: METATE RE-ROUGHENING, PECKING, OR POUNDING? Dawn M. Reid and Mari A. Pritchard-Parker Department of Anthropology University of California Riverside, CA 92521 ABSTRACT This paper discusses the results of a replicative study on the roughening of milling equipment, specifically metates. The intent of the replication was to ascertain ifdiffering results were achieved when various percussor types were used to re-roughen a metate-like surface. Hammerstones prepared by flaking and unmodified cobbles were utilized. The results obtained in the replication were then compared with archaeological specimens in an attempt to determine more information as to the manufacturing and use behaviors associated with milling equipment. INTRODUCTION ment would be most efficiently accom­ plished with tools of different shapes and Stone metates or grinding stones have sizes, depending upon how much mass one long been a primary food processing tool for is trying to remove and where that mass is many agricultural as well as hunting and located. Where manufacture seeks to re­ gathering societies. Use of these imple­ move a relatively large amount ofmass, re­ ments to reduce both plant and animal ma­ roughening seeks to merely mar the grind­ terial has been well documented. When a ing surface to such a degree that it becomes metate is used in conjunction with a mano useful again. Identifying potential differ­ to grind foodstuffs, sharp edges are sheared ences in the types of tools used in the manu­ off ofthe metate surface and residues from facture and maintenance ofmilling imple­ the material being ground are deposited.
  • MS 01-13.Pdf

    MS 01-13.Pdf

    Unltod St¡toc DopaÉmcnt o,f Agrlcullurc ONRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service National Soil Survey Center Federal Building, Room 152 100 Centennial Mall North Phone: (402) 437-549e Lincoln. NE 68508-3866 FAX: (402) 437-5336 SUBJECT: MGT - Trip Report - Geophysical Training and April12,2013 Field Assistance TO: Homer L. Wilkes File Code: 330-20-7 State Conservationist, NRCS Jackson, Mississippi Purpose: To provide training and technical assistance in the use of electromagnetic induction (EMI) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) in Yazoo County, Mississippi, while assessing soil properties and cultural resources at a registered historical archaeological site (Lake GeorgeÆIolly Bluff Site - 22Y2557). Participants: David Clay, Engineer (Retired), NRCS, Wilkesboro, NC James Curtis, Assistant State Soil Scientist, NRCS, Jackson, MS Rachel Stout-Evans, MLRA Project Leader, NRCS, Metcalfe, MS Cliff Jenkins, Cultural Resources Specialist, NRCS, Jackson, MS Delaney Johnson, State Soil Scientist, NRCS, Jackson, MS Wes Tuttle, Soil Scientist (Geophysical), NRCS, NSSC, Wilkesboro, NC Richard Vaught, MLRA Project Leader, NRCS, Glenwood, AR Activities: All field and office activities were completed on January 25-28,2013. Summary: 1. All participants were given the opportunity to operate, complete field surveys, and evaluate the use of the EM38 meter for soil survey investigations. 2. Electromagnetic induction (EMI) techniques can be used beneficially in the Mississippi Delta Region to show changes in soil physical properties across the landscapes, as demonstrated at the archaeological site (Lake George/flolly Bluff Site -22Y2557). The tools worked very well in predicting textural changes across the survey area. Higher apparent conductivity was associated with increased clay and moisture in the soil profile.
  • From Left to Right, R. P. Soejono, H. R. Van Heekeren, and W. G. Solheim II Hendrik Robert Van Heekeren 1902-1974

    From Left to Right, R. P. Soejono, H. R. Van Heekeren, and W. G. Solheim II Hendrik Robert Van Heekeren 1902-1974

    From left to right, R. P. Soejono, H. R. van Heekeren, and W. G. Solheim II Hendrik Robert van Heekeren 1902-1974 Received 29 September 1975 R. P. SOEJONO The friendly spirit and cooperation I found from scientists as well as from the simple peoples in small villages all over Indonesia will stay with me forever. (van Heekeren's Ceremonial Lecture Dr. H. C., University of Indonesia, 1970) R. H. R. van Heekeren passed away in Heemstede on 10 September 1974 after a four month's illness. His attendance at the "Symposium on Modern D Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia," which was held on 16 May 1974 in Groningen, was the last activity of his lifetime in the field of science. The paper he gave during this symposium dealt with problems ofthe chronology of Indonesian prehistory, which he always considered as being in its formative stage, with research on this subject continuously intensifying. His work of writing the second edition of his book The Bronze-Iron Age of Indonesia (first published in 1958), being done in cooperation with R. P. Soejono at the N.LA.S. (The Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Wassenaar), has not yet been accomplished, in spite of his earnest desire to have the new edition published as quickly as possible. He fell ill upon his return from Groningen, making it impossible for him to continue his writing at the N.LA.S., and this illness ended with his death. It was not expected that he would pass away so soon and so suddenly, as a few days before his death he seemed to be improving and was looking forward to his next visit, the following year, to Indonesia, which he had always considered as his second homeland.
  • A History Southeastern Archaeological Conference Its Seventy-Fifth Annual Meeting, 2018

    A History Southeastern Archaeological Conference Its Seventy-Fifth Annual Meeting, 2018

    A History m of the M Southeastern Archaeological Conference m in celebration of M Its Seventy-Fifth Annual Meeting, 2018 Dedicated to Stephen Williams: SEAC Stalwart Charles H. McNutt 1928–2017 Copyright © 2018 by SEAC Printed by Borgo Publishing for the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Copy editing and layout by Kathy Cummins ii Contents Introduction .............................................................................................1 Ancestors ..................................................................................................5 Setting the Agenda:The National Research Council Conferences ....................................................................15 FERACWATVAWPA ............................................................................21 Founding Fathers ...................................................................................25 Let’s Confer !! .........................................................................................35 The Second Meeting ..............................................................................53 Blest Be the Tie That Binds ..................................................................57 The Other Pre-War Conferences .........................................................59 The Post-War Revival ............................................................................65 Vale Haag ................................................................................................73 The CHSA-SEAC Years (1960–1979)..................................................77