DOCSLIB.ORG

Ontario Under the 1986 Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting Great Lakes Water Quality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ontario Under the 1986 Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting Great Lakes Water Quality Technical Summary 3 I Swmnd dqi~itof Canada Under m- - ----- the 1987 Protor?olto the 1978 -- -= - -C I S Great LabsWater Quality 8+prrosmnmnt =-E .--F-s 0- - E -I II This report is printed on recycled paper containing post-consumer flbres. ~galementdisponible sous le titre: Dewdeme rapport prksente par le Canada en vertu du Protocole de 1987 sur 1'Accord de 1978 relatif A la qualit6 de l'eau dans les Grands Lacs - Precis technique de l'ensemble des activites Issued under the authority of the Minister of the Environment Q Minister of Supply and Services Canada 199 1 Cat. No. En40-1 1 123-1990-23 ISBN 0-662-19095-5 SECOND REPORT OF CANADA UNDER THE 1987 PROTOCOL TO THE 1978 GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY AGREEMENT TECHNICAL SUMMARY Prepared by: The Government of Canada and the Government of the Province of Ontario under The 1986 Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting Great Lakes Water Quality December 1990 Tecl7nical Summary "The Parties [Crznada and Ontario] agree that their long term strrzfegic objective is% restore and protect the chemical, physical and biolosical irztegrity of the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem as a rntilti-zrsc resource zolzose base provides the setting and foundation for social dez~elopmentand economic investment." Article II, Strategic Objective, Canada-Ontario Agreement This report is dedicated to all citizens of the Great Lakes Basin who have contributed in the past and wlzo zoill contribute in the future to the preservation and restoration of this vital resource for present arzd future generations. Tecl~nicalSummary Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .............................................IV LIST OF FIGURES ............................................V LIST OF MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS ...............................VI INTRODUCTION .............................................1 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ...................................3 ANNEX 1: SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES ................................ 5 Ecosystem Objectives ...................................5 Standard Methods and Lists of Substances ......................6 ANNEX 2: REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND LAKEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLANS . 9 The Development of Remedial Action Plans ...................... 9 Success Stories .......................................12 RAP Development Progress ...............................16 The North Shore of Lake Superior Remedial Action Plans ............16 Thunder Bay ......................................16 Nipigon Bay ......................................18 Jackfish Bay ......................................20 Peninsula Harbour ...................................22 Spanish River .....................................22 Severn Sound .....................................25 Collingwood Harbour ................................25 Wheatley Harbour ...................................29 Hamilton Harbour ...................................29 Metro Toronto and Region ..............................33 Port Hope Harbour ..................................35 Bay of Quinte .....................................37 Binational Remedial Action Plans ..........................40 St . Marys River ..................................... 40 St . Clair River .....................................40 Detroit River ......................................43 Niagara River .....................................45 St . Lawrence River ..................................47 Federal-Provincial Remedial Action Plan Co-ordinators/ Public Advisory Committee Chairs ........................49 Lake Ontario Toxics Management Plan ........................51 Lakewide Management Plans ..............................51 ANNEX 3: CONTROL OF PHOSPHORUS ............................55 Phosphorus Load Reduction Plan ............................55 Municipal Industrial-Control Programs ........................55 Phosphorus Non-point Sources: Programs and Measures ..............56 Soil and Water Environmental Enhancement Program (SWEEP) ..........57 Monitoring and Surveillance ...............................62 Technical Summary ANNEX 4: DISCHARGES OF OIL AND HAZARDOUS POLLUTING SUBSTANCES FROM VESSELS ............................63 ANNEX 5: DISCHARGES OF VESSEL WASTES .........................65 ANNEX 6: REVIEW OF POLLUTION FROM SHIPPING SOURCES ............67 Zebra Mussels .......................................68 ANNEX 7: DREDGING ........................................71 ANNEX 8: DISCHARGES FROM ONSHORE AND OFFSHORE FACILITIES .......73 ANNEX 9: JOINT CONTINGENCY PLAN ............................75 ANNEX 10: HAZARDOUS POLLUTING SUBSTANCES ....................77 ANNEX 11: SURVEILLANCE AND MONITORING .........: .............79 Federal Activities .....................................79 Canada-United States Binational Activities ......................83 Provincial Activities ....................................84 ANNEX 12: PERSISTENT TOXIC SUBSTANCES .........................97 Federal Activities ......................................97 Provincial Activities ..................................... 99 ANNEX 13: POLLUTION FROM NON-POINT SOURCES : .................105 Rural Non-point Source Pollution ...........................105 Urban Non-point Source Pollution ..........................108 Wetlands and their Preservation ...........................109 ANNEX 14: CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT ...........................113 ANNEX 15: AIRBORNE TOXIC SUBSTANCES .........................117 Research ..........................................117 Surveillance and Monitoring .............................120 Pollution Control Measures .............................. 121 ANNEX 16: POLLUTION FROM CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER ..........123 Federal Programs ....................................123 Federal/Provincial Programs .............................124 International Consultation ...............................125 Provincial Programs ..................................125 ANNEX 17: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ..........................127 Great Lakes University Research Fund .........................127 Technical Sulnrnary APPENDICES APPENDIX ONE .GOVERNMENT RESPONSES TO RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE FOURTH AND FIFTH BIENNIAL REPORTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION AND THE SEPTEMBER. 1990. INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONIGREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION'S REPORT. EXOTIC SPECIES AND THE SHIPPING INDUSTRY: THE GREAT LAKES .ST . LAWRENCE ECOSYSTEM ATRISK .........................................129 APPENDIX TWO .GOVERNMENT CONTACT LIST ......................151 APPENDIX THREE .PUBLICATIONSIPRESENTATIONS ................... 155 Annex1 ..........................................155 Annex2 ..........................................155 Annex 3 and Annex 13 .................................160 Annex6 ..........................................162 Annex11 .........................................162 Annex12 .........................................169 Annex14 .........................................172 Annex15 .........................................174 Annex16 ......................................... 177 CANADA-ONTARIO AGREEMENT RESPECTING GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY BOARD OF REVIEW AND COORDINATING COMMITTEE .................179 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................180 Technical Summary LIST OF TABLES - TABLE I Canadian Areas of Concern - Anticipated Schedule of Submissions of Remedial Action Plans to the International Joint Commission .......... .ll TABLE I1 Comparison of 1988 and 1989 Ontario Municipal Point Source Discharges to the Lower Lakes .............................56 TABLE 111 Compliance With Phosphorus Control Requirements ................56 TABLE IV Comparison of 1987 and 1989 Ontario Industrial Point Source Discharges to Lake Erie ................................. .57 TABLE V Summary of Expenditures Under the Sweep Agreement 1985 to 1990 .......58 TABLE VI Expenditures for MNR's Wetlands Management Program ............110 TABLE VII Ambient Air Toxics Monitoring Protocol (Environmental Protection) ......119 Technical Stlrnrnary LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 Lake Ontario Total Phosphorus .............................80 FIGURE 2 Lake Ontario Nitrate/Nitrite Filtered ..........................80 FIGURE 3 Total Phosphorus Load at Niagara-on-the-Lake ....................82 FIGURE 4 Nitrate-Nitrite Nitrogen Load at Niagara-on-the-Lake ................83 FIGURE 5 Mean Concentration of PCB in Coho Salmon Collected at the Credit River ........................................86 FIGURE 6 Mean Concentration of Mirex in Rainbow Trout from the Ganraska River Mouth ..................................86 FIGURE 7 Lake St . Clair Walleye Mean Annual Mercury 1970-1989 ..............87 FIGURE 8 Lake Superior at Peninsula Harbour PCB in Lake Trout 1976-1987 .........88 FIGURE 9 Lake Superior at Peninsula Harbour Mercury in Lake Trout 1976-1989 ......89 FIGURE 10a Niagara River .Canadian Sites PCB in Cladophora .................90 FIGURE lob Niagara River .American Sites PCB in Cladophora (Love Canal. Bloody Run Creek)..................................... 90 FIGURE 10c Niagara River .American Sites PCB in Cladophora (Gill Creek) ..........90 FIGURE lla Niagara River .Canadian Sites Mercury in Cladophora ...............91 FIGURE 1:Lb Niagara River .American Sites Mercury in Cladophora ...............91 FIGURE 12a Niagara River .Canadian Sites Lead in Cladophora .................92 FIGURE 12b Niagara River .American Sites Lead in Cladophora ................. 92 FIGURE 13a Niagara River .Canadian Sites Aluminum in Cladophora .............93 FIGURE 13b Niagara River .American Sites Aluminum in Cladophora .............93 FIGURE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2012 St. Louis River Summit Proceedings
    St. Louis River Estuary Science Summit 2012 March 8 & 9 University of Wisconsin - Superior Yellowjacket Union St. Louis River Estuary Summit (March 2012) Page 2 Acknowledgments Thanks are owed to many people and organizations for support of this very grass-roots event. Special thanks to the following organizations who provided funding and in-kind contributions: Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve University of Wisconsin Extension University of Wisconsin – Superior Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. Barr Engineering Company US Environmental Protection Agency – Mid-Continent Ecology Division Enbridge Engineering Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program Wisconsin Coastal Management Program Wisconsin Sea Grant West Wisconsin Land Trust Limnotech Minnesota Sea Grant Organizing committee: Shon Schooler, Lake Superior NERR Sarah Johnson, Northland College John Jereczek, MN DNR Nick Danz, UW Superior Pat Collins, US FWS David Bolgrien, US EPA Rick Gitar, Fond du Lac Reservation Editors: Shon Schooler, Seth Bliss, Ralph Garono, and Patrick Collins Published by The Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve, Superior, WI LSNERR Document number: 2012-R-1002 Cover photo by Sue OHalloran Interior Photos by Michel Anderson (www.singingcanoe.smugmug.com) St. Louis River Estuary Summit (March 2012) Page 3 Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................6 Abstracts for Oral Presentations ..................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan (LAMP) 2015-2019
    Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan 2015 - 2019 The Lake Superior Partnership September 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was made possible by the many individuals and organizations working to restore and protect the Lake Superior ecosystem. The document builds upon many relevant local, tribal, state provincial, national and binational plans. Special thanks to all those involved in preparing A Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Lake Superior (LSBP, 2015); to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission’s Lake Superior Technical Committee; to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Lakewide Management Annex (Annex 2) Subcommittee; to the numerous stakeholder groups that helped to refine the document through their review and comments at various stages of development; and to all the individuals of the Lake Superior Partnership who contributed to the LAMP’s development and who will be collaborating during the implementation of this plan. This document was prepared by the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan Writing Team, co-chaired by Rob Hyde of Environment and Climate Change Canada (formerly Environment Canada) and Liz LaPlante of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Writing Team members included: Jen Ballinger (GLIFWC), Marilee Chase (MNRF), Faith Fitzpatrick (USGS), John Jereczek (MNDNR), Ann McCammon-Soltis (GLIFWC), Michelle McChristie (MOECC), Henry Quinlan (USFWS), Mike Ripley (CORA), Lisa Sealock (ECCC), Stephanie Swart (MDEQ), Brent Schleck (NOAA), Amy Thomas (Battelle), Michele Wheeler (WDNR) and Laurie
    [Show full text]
  • The People of Scarborough
    ~THE SCARf>OROUGH PuBLIC LIBF{\RY I BOARP THE PEOPLE OF SCARBOROUGH Map of Scarborough ,.; .; .,; ::. .,; .,; .,; "'""- :;, -< "" -< "" "" 'ti "" "" S.teele~ Ave. V IV Finch Avenue III Sileppail.d Ave. 11 D St. REFERENCE POINTS 1. Thomson Park Z. Bluffer's Park J 3. civic Centre 4. Kennedy Subway 5. Metro Zoo Ikml 6. Guild Inn 1 mile! Map of Scarborough courtesy of Rick Schofield, Heritage Scarborough THE PEOPLE OF SCARBOROUGH The City of Scarborough Public Library Board Copyright© The City of Scarborough Public Library Board 1997 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise for purposes of resale. Published by The City of Scarborough Public Library Board Grenville Printing 25 Scarsdale Rd. Don Mills, Ontario M3B 2R2 Raku ceramic Bicentennial Collector Plate and cover photo by Tom McMaken, 1996. Courtesy of The City of Scarborough. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Myrvold, Barbara The People of Scarborough: a history Includes index. ISBN 0-9683086-0-0 1. Scarborough (Ont.) - History. I. Fahey, Curtis, 1951- . II Scarborough Public Library Board. III. Title. FC3099.S33M97 1997 971.3'541 C97-932612-5 F1059.5.T686S35 1997 iv Greetings from the Mayor As Mayor of the City of Scarborough, and on behalf of Members of Council, I am pleased that The People of Scarborough: A History, has been produced. This book provides a chronological overview of the many diverse peoples and cultures that have contributed to the city's economic, cultural and social fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Resources Investigations in Wisconsin, 2004
    Water-Resources Investigations in Wisconsin, 2004 Open-File Report 2004–1403 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations in Wisconsin, 2004 Compiled by Jennifer L. Bruce, Michelle M. Greenwood, and Susan Z. Jones Open-File Report 2004–1403 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Contents iii Contents Basic Mission and Projects ...................................................................................................................vii Wisconsin District Organizational Chart ...............................................................................................ix Cooperators ................................................................................................................................................x Summary of Hydrologic Conditions .......................................................................................................xi Surface-Water and Sediment Studies Team ...........................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • St. Louis and Lower Nemadji River Watershed
    Wisconsin St. Louis and Lower Nemadji Watersheds River Watershed 2010 Water Quality Management Plan Update Lake Superior Basin, Wisconsin August, 2010 The t.S Louis River, the largest U.S. tributary to Lake Superior, drains 3,634 square miles, entering the southwestern corner of the lake between Duluth, Minnesota and Superior, Wisconsin. The river flows 179 miles through three distinct areas: coarse soils, glacial till and outwash deposits at its headwaters; a deep, narrow gorge at Jay Cooke State Park in Minnesota; and red clay deposits in its lower reaches. As the St. Louis River approaches Duluth and Superior, the river takes on the characteristics of a 12,000 Contents acre freshwater estuary. The upper estuary has some Watershed Details 1 wilderness-like areas, while the lower estuary is character- Population and Land Use . 1 ized by urban development, an industrial harbor, and Ecological Landscapes . 3 a major port. The lower estuary includes St. Louis Bay, Other Details . 3 Map 1: St Louis River and Lower Nemadji Superior Bay, Allouez Bay, Kimball’s Bay, Pokegama Bay, River Watershed Invasive Species . 3 Howard’s Bay, and the lower Nemadji River. Historical Note . 4 Watershed Details Watershed Condition 4 Priority Issues . 4 Water Quality Goals . 4 Population and Land Use Overall Condition . 4 The watershed is dominated by Point and Nonpoint Sources . 5 forests (65%), agriculture (9%), Fish Consumption Advice . 5 followed closely by open water River and Stream Condition . 5 and open space (8%) (Figure 1). Lakes and Embayments . 16 Wetlands . 17 In 1987, the International Joint Waters of Note: . .22 Commission, an advisory com- mission on U.S-Canadian border Watershed Actions 23 Figure 1: Land Use in the St Louis and Lower Nemadji River Partnership Activities .
    [Show full text]
  • STATE-REGION7 FUTURE Great Lakes Region
    STATE-REGION7 FUTURE -'adeavailable under NASA sponsorWip Great Lakes Region in the interc-st of early and wide dis. sominiation of Earth Resources Survey - O Program inforration and without liability for any use m-Ue thereof." ft.14 /, a / 7 1'975 NationalWater Assessment ' E91O3) STAT' -REGIZONAI ]FUTU]RE GR /- N79-30594 ,LAKES REGION: IBM 1975 NIAfIONaL WATEE ,A.SESSHENIT (Great Liakes Basin Comm'ission) , /­ / / All / Juy 97 iE 1023\t6 •TT-EII c- # - I ~ . 7 NataJaonal Ws STATE-REGIONJ FUTURE Made available under NASA sponsorWip Great Lakes Region Ithe intercst of early and wide dis. ,minat,on of Earth Resources Survey if. - 1 ­ rograril Iqfcrtion and without liability I rany use m-Ude thereof." 4 ~~44of ,~~~ I Irlrf Ii :15 7' 1975 National Water Assessment '(E7~9jI0233) STAT' -REGIONA1 , < PUTU1E GRtEAT t r N79_30594/ LAKES REGION: THI 1975 11fICNAL flER 'ASSESSMENT (Great,ftakes Basin Commission) 119 p A~C A09/MP A01 / ) /"- C\sc/8l / Inclas - /fl" 'G3/43 00233, / / 1 I \ / iiI, I I I II I - - \fj i 1 \ Ii STATE-REGIONAL FUTURE GREAT LAKES REGION 1975 National Water Assessment Great Lakes Basin Commission July 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION......................... 1 REGIONAL GOALS ........... ............... .......... 7 LAKE SUPERIOR REGIONAL GOALS . ................. 8 LAKE MICHIGAN REGIONAL GOALS ....... .................... 15 LAKE HURON REGIONAL GOALS ........ ...................... 22 LAKE ERIE REGIONAL GOALS . .............. 25 LAKE ONTARIO REGIONAL GOALS ...... 32 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS........ ..................... 41 LAKE SUPERIOR REGION - ASA 01 ..... .. ..... 43 NORTHWESTERN LAKE MICHIGAN REGION - ASA 02 .... ........... 47 SOUTHWESTERN LAKE MICHIGAN REGION - ASA 03 . 47 EASTERN LAKE MICHIGAN REGION - ASA 04..... ........ .. 47 LAKE HURON REGION - ASA 05 .
    [Show full text]
  • K:\CASC\Public Services\FA Finalized\Political and Social
    Canadian Archives Branch Direction des archives canadiennes Maxwell Cohen fonds MG31-E24 Finding Aid No. 1039 / Instrument de recherche no 1039 Prepared by Cecilia Sev in March 2000 and Préparé en mars 2000 par Cecilia Sev et en by Alix McEwen in 2004 for Economic and 2004 par Alix McEwen pour les Archives sur Governance Archives Section l’économie et la géstion publique ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PERSONAL PAPERS .........................................1, 87, 113, 130 CANADIAN LAW ..................................................12, 98 POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT ..................................21, 99, 123 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW .......35, 103, 124 LABOUR.....................................................64, 110, 124 COMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY ...........................................69 JEWISH COMMUNITY RECORDS ...................................76, 111 OTHER ORGANIZATIONS ......................................82, 111, 125 Maxwell Cohen fonds MG31-E24 Container File File Title Date PERSONAL PAPERS 1 1 Personal Correspondence 1938 1 2 Personal Correspondence 1939-1940 1 3 Personal Correspondence 1946 1 4 Personal Correspondence 1947 1 5 Personal Correspondence 1948 1 6 Personal Correspondence 1949 1 7 Personal Correspondence 1950 1 8 Personal Correspondence 1951 1 9 Personal Correspondence 1952 1 10 Personal Correspondence 1953 1 11 Personal Correspondence 1954 1 12 Personal Correspondence 1955 2 1 Personal Correspondence 1955 2 2 Personal Correspondence 1956 2 3 Personal Correspondence 1956 2 4 Personal Correspondence
    [Show full text]
  • 201 Guildwood Parkway (Including 191 Guildwood Parkway)
    REPORT FOR ACTION Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 201 Guildwood Parkway (including 191 Guildwood Parkway) Date: May 17, 2018 To: Toronto Preservation Board Scarborough Community Council From: Director, Urban Design, City Planning Wards: Ward 43, Scarborough East SUMMARY This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described for the property located at 201 Guildwood Parkway (including the property known as 191 Guildwood Parkway) to allow for the rehabilitation of Building 191 as the Clark Centre for the Arts, a City operated arts and culture facility. RECOMMENDATIONS The Director, Urban Design, City Planning, recommends that: 1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 201 Guildwood Parkway (including 191 Guildwood Parkway), in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the rehabilitation of the existing Building 191 as an arts and cultural facility on the lands known municipally in the year 2018 as 201 Guildwood Parkway (including 191 Guildwood Parkway) with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated October 24, 2017 and revised May 10, 2018, prepared by Taylor Hazell Architects Ltd. and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by Taylor Hazell Architects Ltd, dated July 2017 and revised May 2018, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions: a. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the property located at 201 Guildwood Parkway (including 191 Guildwood Parkway), the owner shall: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Guild Park: Various Sandstone Carvings and Front Entrance from the Bank’S Main Building at 39 King St
    11. Solstice (1982) 17. The Bear (1979) Modern, black painted steel sculpture by Stylized brown bear carved on-site by E.B. Russian artist Kosso Eloul. One of 35 works Cox and Michael Clay. Nearby is the Music displayed for the Contemporary Outdoor Wall (1897-1968) from the Toronto Sculpture Exhibition hosted at the Guild in Conservatory of Music, at University & College, which highlights renowned Canadian 1982. The international event was curated by musicians, Dr. Healy Willan and Sir Ernest sculptor Sorel Etrog, a friend of the Clarks. MacMillan; and The Swan (pre-WWII) by British artist Peter Hills, was from a building in 12. Bank of Nova Scotia London’s Piccadilly Circus destroyed in the (1903-69) Blitz. The Clarks later acquired the sculpture. Guild Park: Various sandstone carvings and front entrance from the bank’s main building at 39 King St. W. 18. Toronto Star Building Artifacts (1929-72) Where Art 13. Musidora & Imperial Bank of Canada Art Deco elements saved from the newspaper offices demolished for First Canadian Place. Meets Nature (1875 and 1928-72 respectively) Italian marble figure by English sculptor 19. Terracotta Gates Marshall Wood. It is Guild Park’s oldest (1890-1980) artwork. Wood’s sculptures are displayed From the Produce Exchange Building, near worldwide, including at the Parliamentary today’s King Edward Hotel. Library in Ottawa. Musidora is framed by the marble façade of the Imperial Bank of Canada, 20. Scarborough Bluffs originally located at 802 Yonge St. The vista from Scarborough Bluffs is about 200 feet above Lake Ontario, with New York 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Point Small Area Plan Are Contained in Appendix a 2 Park Point Small Area Plan TABLE of CONTENTS
    P P OINT ARK SMALL AREA PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Mayor City Planning Division Staff Don Ness Keith Hamre, Director John Judd, Senior Planner City Council John Kelley, Planner II Zack Filipovich Steven Robertson, AICP, Senior Planner Jay Fosle Kyle Deming, Planner II Sharla Gardner Jenn Reed Moses, AICP, Planner II Howie Hanson Jennifer Julsrud Small Area Plan Committee Linda Krug Sharla Gardner, City Council Emily Larson Heather Rand, City Planning Commission Barb Russ Thomas Beery, City Parks and Recreation Commission Joel Sipress John Goldfine, Business Representative Jan Karon, Resident Planning Commission Sally Raushenfels, Resident Marc Beeman Dawn Buck, Resident Terry Guggenbuehl Deb Kellner, Resident Janet Kennedy Kinnan Stauber, Resident Tim Meyer Garner Moffat Heather Rand Luke Sydow Michael Schraepfer Zandra Zwiebel City Council Resolutions for the Park Point Small Area Plan are contained in Appendix A 2 Park Point Small Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Assessment ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Purpose of the Plan ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guild Park & Horticulture Plans
    SECTION 2 : plan context GUILD PARK & GARDENS horticulture plan | 2018 9 10 GUILD PARK & GARDENS horticulture plan | 2018 history The Guild Park and Gardens has a long and illustrious history, which began with the parceling of land tracts for distribution to Loyalists following the American Revolutionary War. One of the property’s earliest owners, William Ousterhout, while never having lived on the site, has come to be associated with the log cabin that bears his name. The Ousterhout Log Cabin has been dated back to approximately 1850 and persists to this day as one of four designated heritage buildings on the Park site. The property changed hands many times in the 19th and early 20th century. In 1914, owner General Bickford, created the Ranelagh Park View of Bickford House and an event tent, country estate on the site and built the Bickford House as a summer 2000 resort. The estate house formed the nucleus for the Guild Inn, which is now a designated cultural heritage building. In 1932 Rosa Hewetson purchased the over 450 acre property, where she married Spencer Clark. The same year, she and Spencer formed the Guild of All Arts. Inspired by the arts and crafts community at Roycroft, New York State, ‘The Guild of All Arts’ started as a social contribution in the depression years, providing a home and a forum for artists and artisans, where their work was created and collected for the enjoyment of many. There is still a significant public art collection on the site. The Guild of All Arts was active from 1932 until 1942 and, after the war, from 1947 until Spencer Clark’s death in the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • May 14, 2021 DOUGLAS COUNTY LAND
    May 14, 2021 DOUGLAS COUNTY LAND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 18, 2021, 10:00 a.m. Government Center, Boardroom 201 1316 North 14th Street, Superior, Wisconsin OR JOIN BY PHONE: (US) +1 252-584-0118 PIN: 782 923 307# OR VIDEO: https://meet.google.com/ffx-amnz-oki *Due to COVID-19 concerns, members of the committee and public may attend the meeting remotely. Please call the Chair or County Clerk’s Office (715-395-1569) if you are unable to attend. MEMBERS: Sue Hendrickson, Chair Mary Lou Bergman, Vice Chair Kathryn McKenzie Larry Luostari Jim Soyring, FSA Wendy Bong AMENDED A G E N D A (Committee to maintain a two-hour meeting limit or take action to continue meeting beyond that time.) 1. Roll call. 2. Approval of minutes from the March 16, 2021, meeting (attached). 3. Presentation: Manure storage facilities – Nathan Johnstad, Stacy Dehne, Jane Anklam. 4. Action items: a. Recommend creation of committee to review Ordinance #8.15 – Douglas County Animal Manure Storage (attached); b. Support creation of agriculture enterprise area(s) in Douglas County (attached); c. Wildlife Damage and Abatement Program: 1. Report; and 2. Resolution (attached). d. Aquatic Invasive Species Strategic Plan approval (attached); e. Environmental Reserve Fund: 1. Funding requests: a. $600 for 2021 rain barrel project (attached); b. $200 for Minong Flowage drawdown, including letter of support (attached); and c. $1,002.86 for Pleasant View Road community well abandonment (attached). 2. Application revision (attached). f. Grant account creation (attached): 1. Superior Bay and Pickle Pond Yellow Iris Response – 61429; and 2.
    [Show full text]