DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Resources Development in Indiana 1995

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Water Resources Development US Arm y Corps in Indiana 1995 of Engineers River Basins in Indiana This publication is authorized by Cover Photo the Secretary of the Army Patoka Lake as required by PL 99-662 CEORL-PD-E SUBJECT: Water Resources Development in Indiana 1995 DISTRIBUTION: COPIES CDR USAGE, ATTN: CEPA-C 2 CDR USACE. ATTN: CECW-AL 2 CDR USACE, ATTN: CEIM-IV 4 CDR USACE, ATTN: CECW-MP 10 CDR USACE. ATTN: CEWRC-NDC 1 CDR Lower Mississippi Valley Division 2 CDR New England Division 2 CDR North Atlantic Division 2 CDR North Central Division • 0 CDR North Pacific Division 2 CDR Ohio River Division 20 CDR Pacific Ocean Division 2 CDR South Atlantic Division 2 CDR South Pacific Division - CDR Southwestern Division 2 CDR US Army Engineer District ALASKA 2 CDR US Army Engineer District ALBUQUERQUE 2 CDR US Army Engineer District BALTIMORE ' 2 CDR US Army Engineer District BUFFALO 2 CDR US Army Engineer District CHARLESTON 2 CDR US Army Engineer District CHICAGO 20 CDR US Army Engineer District DETROIT 20 CDR US Army Engineer District FORT WORTH 2 CDR US Army Engineer District GALVESTON 2 CDR US Army Engineer District HUNTINGTON 2 CDR US Army Engineer District JACKSONVILLE 2 CDR US Army Engineer District LITTLE ROCK ATTN: CESWL-PL-S 2 CDR US Army Engineer District LOS ANGELES 2 CDR US Army Engineer District MEMPHIS ATTN: CELMM-PD-F 2 CDR US Army Engineer District MOBILE 2 CDR US Army Engineer District NASHVILLE 2 CDR US Army Engineer District NEW ORLEANS 2 CDR US Army Engineer District NEW YORK 2 CDR US Army Engineer District NORFOLK 2 CDR US Army Engineer District OMAHA ATTN: CEMRO-PD-F 2 CDR US Army Engineer District PHILADELPHIA 2 CDR US Army Engineer District PITTSBURGH 2 CDR US Army Engineer District PORTLAND 2 CDR US Army Engineer District ROCK ISLAND ATTN: CENCR-PA 2 CDR US Army Engineer District SACRAMENTO 2 CDR US Army Engineer District SAN FRANCISCO 2 CDR US Army Engineer District SAVANNAH 2 CDR US Armv Engineer District SEATTLE 2 CDR US Army Engineer District ST. LOUIS ATTN: CELMS-PM-M 2 CDR US Army Engineer District ST. PAUL 2 CDR US Army Engineer District TULSA 2 CDR US Army Engineer District VICKSBURG 2 CDR US Army Engineer District WALLA WALLA 2 CDR US Army Engineer District WILMINGTON 2 CDR US Army Engineer School Library Fort Leonard Wood 2 2 Water Resources Development IN By the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 'T ) in Indiana Within the boundaries of the State of Indiana, two Divisions and three Districts are responsible for the projects and activities of the Corps of Engineers described in this booklet. These projects and activities are defined by river basins rather than by political boundaries. Thus, the work within the State may be under the jurisdiction of more than one District and Division as shown on the map on the opposite page. Additional information on particular projects and activities discussed herein may be obtained by addressing the appropriate office listed below: Division Engineer Division Engineer U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River U.S. Army Engineer Division North Central Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 1159 111 N. Canal Street, 12th Floor Cincinnati, Ohio 45201-1159 Chicago, Illinois 60606-7205 District Engineer District Engineer U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville U.S. Army Engineer District, Chicago Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 59 111 N. Canal Street, Suite 600 Louisville, Kentucky 40201-0059 Chicago, Illinois 60606-7206 District Engineer U.S. Army Engineer District, Detroit Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 1027 Detroit, Michigan 48231-1027 i Letter from the Chief of Engineers The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was founded some 220 years ago to be respon­ sive to the needs of a young nation. While the nature of our work has changed with time, our basic purpose remains — to be responsive to America’s needs. Clearly the Nation’s concern for the environment has permeated the Corps. Under the National Environmental Policy Act, environmental considerations are part of the plan­ ning of every Corps project, and under the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, environmental stewardship was made a primary Corps mission along with navigation and flood control. Response to natural disasters offers opportunities for some of the most direct Corps assistance to local communities. From flood fighting, recovery and levee rehabilitation in response to the Midwest Flood of 1993, to emergency water, electrical power, construction and building inspections after the Northridge Earthquake, Corps people have shown courage, commitment and tenacity. We have continued to enhance our responsiveness to customer needs. For example, the Corps achieved a major cultural shift by instituting a project management system, which assigns one manager to stay with a project from planning through design and construction and to serve as the single point of contact for that project. It has achieved greater account­ ability to our non-Federal partners and, ultimately, projects which better reflect the needs of the community. Partnering represents another positive shift in Corps business practices, particularly in civil works construction. A local sponsorship kit walks customers through the complexi­ ties of Corps projects. A technique related to partnering, alternative dispute resolution, cre­ ates an atmosphere in which the clash of differing viewpoints can transform into creative solutions and prevent costly legal disputes. Pioneered by the Corps, alternative dispute reso­ lution is gaining acceptance throughout the Federal government. We are active participants in two major interagency efforts. The Interagency Flood Plain Management Review Committee is looking at ways the Federal government can most effectively reduce the risk of flood damage and provide economic benefits and environmen­ tal enhancement in flood plains. The Interagency Working Group on the Dredging Process, meanwhile, is establishing better ways to handle the nearly 300 million cubic yards of soil the Corps moves each year from its navigation projects. And, of course, we still respond to the needs of American families. As one of the Nation’s largest providers of outdoor recreation, the Corps welcomes citizens to its 461 lakes and other water resource projects. At 82 shore protection projects, the Corps has pro­ vided 226 miles of stable beaches. Recreation and natural resource management are respon­ sibilities we take seriously, and we use the opportunity of a visit to a Corps project to help others appreciate our Nation’s valuable and delicate natural resources. This booklet is one of a series detailing Corps of Engineers water resources pro­ grams and projects in the 50 states and in U.S. territories. I hope you will find it interesting and feel pride in ownership of the projects. Arthur E. Williams Lieutentant General, USA ii Chief of Engineers Letter from the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has a long and proud history of applying its expertise in engineering and related disciplines to meet the Nation’s needs. Over the years, its activities have evolved; however, since 1824, the central focus of its civil mission has been the development of the Nation’s water resources. With an annual program of over $3 billion for civil projects, the Corps is the Federal Government’s largest water resources development agency. The Corps develops projects that have proven to be wise invest­ ments. These projects have reduced flood damages; provided safe, low cost waterborne transportation; generated hydroelectric power; provided water for the public, industry and agriculture; offered opportunities for recreation; and helped the environment. They return to the public benefits that far outweigh their costs. Corps civil works activities reflect partnership. All Corps projects begin when non- Federal interests see a water-related problem and petition Congress for a solution. Under provisions of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, once the Corps conducts a reconnaissance study to determine whether a feasible project is likely, these sponsors pro­ vide a share of the funding for the feasibility study upon which a project will be based. They also provide a share of the cost of the project’s design and construction once Congress has authorized the project and provided construction funds. During the period 1986-1994, non-Federal sponsors signed 286 cooperative agreements with the Department of the Army for cost sharing of project construction. The Corps engineering expertise and responsiveness has stood the Nation in good stead during times of natural disaster. During 1994, the Corps continued to rehabilitate levees damaged by the Midwest Flood of 1993 and responded to the Northridge, California, Earthquake and the floods that ravaged the Southeast. Whatever challenges arise in the decades ahead, I have no doubt the Army Corps of Engineers will be equal to the task. Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) iii Foreword C. The Wabash River Basin includes a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, of which 24,218 are in Indiana comprising two-thirds of This booklet contains information on the scope of the state. water-resource projects and studies by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers within the State of 1) The Upper Wabash River Basin Indiana. It describes briefly the role of the Corps includes the drainage area of the Wabash of Engineers in the planning, construction, and River from its headwaters to above the operation of water-resource improvements, and mouth of the White River, and is located in includes an explanation of the procedure for the north-central portion of the state. initiating studies leading to authorization of projects. Information is given on the status of 2) The Lower Wabash River Basin projects, whether the construction has been includes the drainage area of the two completed, is underway, or not started, together major tributaries, the White and Patoka with data on the purpose and schedule of studies.
Recommended publications
  • 20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan Volume 4: Ohio River Flood Protection

    20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan Volume 4: Ohio River Flood Protection

    20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan Volume 4: Ohio River Flood Protection In Association with: NAC | K.S. Ware & Associates | RKX | Powers Engineering June 2017 20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan Volume 4: Ohio River Flood Protection In Association with: NAC | K.S. Ware & Associates | RKX | Powers Engineering June 2017 CH2M One Riverfront Plaza 401 West Main Street Suite 800 Louisville, KY 40202 O +1 502-584-6052 www.ch2m.com Angela L. Akridge, PE, Chief Engineer Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District 700 West Liberty Street Louisville, KY 40203 June 30, 2017 Subject: 20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan—Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan Dear Ms. Akridge, The attached 20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan, also referred to as the Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD) Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan, represents MSD’s most ambitious planning effort in a decade. The 2-year effort reviewed the challenges our community faces now and in the future, identified practical solutions, and developed a roadmap to protect the health, economic vitality, and environment of our city. The recommendations in this Facility Plan are the result of careful evaluation by the Facility Plan Team, which includes some of the most experienced engineers in Louisville Metro. We believe that the recommendations presented in this Facility Plan are essential to maintaining reliable facilities that will allow MSD to fulfill its responsibility for safe, clean waterways and help preserve and promote our competitiveness as a city. One driver that led to Facility Plan development was a recognition that—for the past 10 years—MSD has focused much of its resources and investments on tackling the federally mandated undertaking to reduce sewer overflows.
  • Conceptual Master Plan for Phase IV

    Conceptual Master Plan for Phase IV

    PHPHASE IV CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN REPORT July 2014 Client Louisville Metro Waterfront Development Corporation Stakeholders Cheri Bryant Hamilton, Metro Council David Tandy, Metro Council Rep. Darryl T. Owens Cathy Shannon Pierre Spaulding Nathalie Andrews Mary Turner Rick Bell Pat Mulvihill Gill Holland Rebecca Matheny, LDP Clark Welch, LDP John Swintosky, Metro Parks Lisa Hite, Metro Parks Myra Friend Ellis, Metro Council Dale Corum, Mercer Transportation Patti Clare, Louisville Metro Grechen Milliken, Louisville Metro Bill Gatewood Ellen Hesen Marty Storch Diane Stampel Master Planning Team David Karem, President WDC Michael Kimmel, Vice-President WDC Margaret Walker, WDC Gary Pepper, WDC Andrew Knight, PLA, ASLA MKSK Boyd Sewe, Intern, MKSK LOUISVILLE WATERFRONT PARK PHASE IV Master Plan Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description 1.2 Planning and Design Process TWO GROUNDING / OBSERVATION & RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 Site History 2.2 Site Context 2.3 Existing Site Conditions 2.4 Site Analysis 2.5 Best Practice Exploration 2.6 Programming THREE DESIGN MOTIVATION 3.1 Design Motivations: Views, One Riverfront, Ecotone 3.2 Building the Diagram FOUR MASTER PLAN 4.1 Phase 4 Master Plan 4.2 Master Plan Alternatives FIVE COMPONENT PLANS 5.1 Foundry Commons 5.2 Foundry Gardens 5.3 Confluence Plaza 5.4 Fort-on-Shore Plaza 5.5 Railyard Plaza 5.6 Picnic Grove 5.7 Midway 5.8 Exerscape 5.9 Lowland Boardwalk 5.10 Waterfront Promenade 5.11 River Road Streetscape SIX PLAN OF ACTION 6.1 Phasing Diagram 6.2 Estimated Project Budget LOUISVILLE WATERFRONT PARK PHASE IV Master Plan Report 3 LOUISVILLE WATERFRONT PARK PHASE IV Master Plan Report 4 INTRODUCTION 1 WHAT: PROJECT DESCRIPTION WHY: PURPOSE OF THE MASTER PLAN HOW: THE MASTER PLANNING STUDY PROCESS This Master Plan Report focuses on Phase IV of the catalytic Waterfront Waterfront Park Phase IV is viewed as a continuum of the River City Grounding: Park in downtown Louisville.
  • Ohio River Mainstem System Study Integrated Main Report (Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Included)

    Ohio River Mainstem System Study Integrated Main Report (Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Included)

    DRAFT SIP/PEIS – May 2006 Ohio River Mainstem System Study Integrated Main Report (Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Included) Table of Contents1 Item Page *EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................. ES-1 SECTION 1 STUDY AUTHORITY .................................................................. 1-1 SECTION 2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE........................................................... 2-1 *2.1 STUDY PURPOSE & NEED FOR ACTION............................................. 2-2 2.1.1 System Investment Plan ............................................................ 2-13 2.1.2 Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement ..................... 2-13 2.2 SCOPE OF STUDIES .............................................................................. 2-17 2.2.1 System Investment Plan ............................................................. 2-17 2.2.2 Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement ...................... 2-19 2.2.3 Cumulative Effects Assessment ................................................ 2-20 2.4 STUDY PLAN FORMULATION PROCESS............................................. 2.23 2.4.1 Identify Problems and Opportunities...…………………………..2-24 2.4.2 Inventory and Forecast Critical Resources……………………..2-24 2.4.3 Formulate Alternative SIPs For Each Traffic Scenario………..2-24 2.4.4 Evaluate Alternative SIPs For Each Traffic Scenario……….…2-25 2.4.5 Determine SIP For Each Traffic Scenario…………………….….2-26 2.4.6 Identify Final SIP and Near Term Activities To Be Implemented………………………………………………………….2-26
  • Inland Waterway Operational Model & Simulation Along the Ohio River

    Inland Waterway Operational Model & Simulation Along the Ohio River

    Kentucky Transportation Center Research Report KTC -14-13/MTIC3-14-1F Inland Waterway Operational Model & Simulation Along the Ohio River Our Mission We provide services to the transportation community through research, technology transfer and education. We create and participate in partnerships to promote safe and effective transportation systems. © 2014 University of Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Center Information may not be used, reproduced, or republished without our written consent. Kentucky Transportation Center 176 Oliver H. Raymond Building Lexington, KY 40506-0281 (859) 257-4513 fax (859) 257-1815 www.ktc.uky.edu Inland Waterway Operational Model & Simulation Along the Ohio River Prepared for: Multimodal Transportation & Infrastructure Consortium by the Kentucky Transportation Center 11/21/2014 This Page Left Intentionally Blank. Inland Waterway Operational Model & Simulation Along the Ohio River Authors: Principal Investigator: Doug Kreis, PE, MBA, PMP Researcher(s): Roy E. Sturgill, Jr., P.E. Brian K. Howell, P.E. Chris Van Dyke D. Steve Voss, Ph.D. Multimodal Transportation and Infrastructure Consortium P.O. Box 5425 Huntington, WV 25703-0425 Phone: (304) 696-2313 • Fax: (304) 696-6088 Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. This page intentionally left blank. 4 List of Figures Figure A: Ohio River Commodity Traffic .................................................................. 12 Figure B: Equivalent Capacities across Modes .......................................................
  • Eliza Curtis: I Was Never a Slave 19

    Eliza Curtis: I Was Never a Slave 19

    Summer 2015 In This Issue . 8. Budding Genealogist 15. Ger. Churches in Butchertown?? 1. Ohio River Islands 9. Louisville’s 1st Zoo . 16. Did You Know? 3. Charles Mengel Home 10. Weaver Revealed 17. Louisville Slugger 4. Hundley Conversion 12. Cemetery Stewards 18. In the News/Then and Now 6. Will Play Golf 13. Eliza Curtis: I was never a slave 19. Upcoming Events 7. Butler Books 14. Louisville Clock Relocated 20. Louisville Historical League OHIO RIVER ISLANDS BY CHUCK PARRISH, HISTORIAN (RET) ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LOUISVILLE DISTRICT Among over 80 Islands in the 981 mile flow of the Ohio River, there are eight of interest and historical significance in the Louisville area, including one no longer extant. Corn Island is perhaps the one with the most historical notoriety, and whose remains lie far beneath the waters formed by McAlpine Dam. It was located near the Kentucky bank out from the end of present day Twelfth Street. Originally dubbed Dunmore’s Island (for the Royal Governor of Virginia) by Thomas Bullitt’s surveying party in 1773, it was on this small island that George Rogers Clark camped with the soldiers he led on their way to engage the British and Indi- ans in the Northwest campaigns of the Revolutionary War. Presumably, the name is derived from the first crop of corn grown there in 1778. Stone quarrying and navigation improvement projects by the Corps of Engineers in the mid-late nineteenth century had removed nearly all of the island by the early 1900s. Likely the last photographs of the river that show Corn Island are those among the collections of The Filson Historical Society, dating ca.
  • Greater Jeffersontown Historical Society Newsletter

    Greater Jeffersontown Historical Society Newsletter

    GREATER JEFFERSONTOWN HISTORICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER August 2013 Vol. 11 Number 4 August 2013 Meeting The August meeting will be Monday, August 5, 2013. We will meet at 7:00 P.M. in the meeting room of the Jeffersontown Library at 10635 Watterson Trail. The Greater Jeffersontown Historical Society meetings are now held on the first Monday of the even numbered months of the year. Everyone is encouraged to attend to help guide and grow the Society. August Meeting - Lessons From Rosenwald Schools Julia Bache will discuss the Rosenwald School movement and how Julius Rosenwald, part owner of the Sears and Roebuck Company, and Booker T. Washington partnered together in the early 1900s to build over 5,000 schools. There were seven Rosenwald schools in Jefferson County and one of those was the Alexander-Ingram School in Jeffersontown. She will also speak about how to take part in historic preservation. Please visit Ms. Bache's work in the Jeffersontown Historical Museum. It will be displayed through noon on August 7th. Julia is a sixteen year old high school student who has recently taken an active stance in historic preservation as a part of her Girl Scout Gold Award Project. With the guidance of L. Martin Perry, she nominated the Buck Creek Rosenwald School to be on the National Register of Historic Places, becoming the first high school student in Kentucky to do so. She then helped educate the public about preservation through a traveling museum exhibit that she created in partnership with the National Trust for Historic Preservation. She has also been speaking to various audiences throughout Kentucky about preserving Rosenwald Schools.
  • Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations

    Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations

    S. HRG. 110–442 Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations Energy and Water Development Appropriations Fiscal Year 2008 110th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION H.R. 2641/S. 1751 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE—CIVIL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES Energy and Water Development Appropriations, 2008 (H.R. 2641/S. 1751) S. HRG. 110–442 ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2641/S. 1751 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOP- MENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2008, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Defense—Civil Department of Energy Department of the Interior Nondepartmental Witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 33–914 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont TED STEVENS, Alaska TOM HARKIN, Iowa ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATTY MURRAY, Washington MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire RICHARD J.
  • CULTURAL-HISTORIC SURVEY for the PROPOSED DEMOLITION of BEECHER TERRACE, LOUISVILLE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, KENTUCKY KHC Project

    CULTURAL-HISTORIC SURVEY for the PROPOSED DEMOLITION of BEECHER TERRACE, LOUISVILLE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, KENTUCKY KHC Project

    CULTURAL-HISTORIC SURVEY FOR THE PROPOSED DEMOLITION OF BEECHER TERRACE, LOUISVILLE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, KENTUCKY KHC Project No. FY17-2707 Prepared for: Louisville Metro Housing Authority 420 S 8th Street Louisville, KY 40203 LEAD AGENCY: Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Prepared by: Mathia N. Scherer, MA Corn Island Archaeology LLC P.O. Box 991259 Louisville, Kentucky 40269 Project No. PR17001 Cultural Resources Report No. TR17013 (Signature) Mathia N. Scherer Principal Investigator December 4, 2017 Cultural-Historic Survey for the Proposed Beecher Terrace Demolition, Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky ABSTRACT Corn Island Archaeology LLC prepared a Cultural-Historic Survey for the proposed demolition of Beecher Terrace public housing development in Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky. The City of Louisville received a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Choice Neighborhoods Initiative grant as well as public and private dollars for the transformation of the Russell neighborhood and the phase demotion and reconstruction of the Beecher Terrace public housing development. The investigation was requested by Louisville Metro Housing Authority to fulfill compliance requirements relative to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. The Area of Potential Effects for this project was determined in consultation with the Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office located in the Kentucky Heritage Council. The Area of Potential Effects includes the Beecher Terrace public housing development (bounded by W. Jefferson Street to the north, S. 9th Street to the east, W. Muhamad Ali Boulevard to the south, and S. 13th Street to the west), as well as the surrounding resources with direct visibility of the housing complex.
  • Division C—Energy and Water Develop- Ment and Related Agencies Appro- Priations Act, 2009

    Division C—Energy and Water Develop- Ment and Related Agencies Appro- Priations Act, 2009

    [House Appropriations Committee Print] Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (H.R. 1105; Public Law 111–8) DIVISION C—ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOP- MENT AND RELATED AGENCIES APPRO- PRIATIONS ACT, 2009 (553) VerDate Nov 24 2008 04:13 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00547 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A494P1.XXX A494P1 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING VerDate Nov 24 2008 04:13 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00548 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A494P1.XXX A494P1 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING CONTENTS, DIVISION C Page Legislative Text: Title I—Department of Defense—Civil: Department of the Army ............... 559 Title II—Department of the Interior ............................................................... 567 Title III—Department of Energy ..................................................................... 572 Title IV—Independent Agencies ...................................................................... 586 Title V—General Provisions ............................................................................ 588 Explanatory Statement: Title I—Department of Defense—Civil: Department of the Army ............... 591 Title II—Department of the Interior ............................................................... 637 Title III—Department of Energy ..................................................................... 646 Title IV—Independent Agencies ...................................................................... 702 Title V—General Provisions ............................................................................ 704 (555) VerDate Nov 24 2008 04:13 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00549 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 0483 E:\HR\OC\A494P1.XXX A494P1 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING VerDate Nov 24 2008 04:13 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00550 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 0483 E:\HR\OC\A494P1.XXX A494P1 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING [CLERK’S NOTE: Five sections which precede division C in the Om- nibus Appropriations Act apply to all divisions of the Act, including this one. The text of these sections is as follows: SECTION 1.
  • Horizon 2035

    Horizon 2035

    HORIZON 2035 The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Louisville (KY-IN) Metropolitan Planning Area: Clark & Floyd Counties, Indiana and Bullitt, Jefferson, & Oldham Counties, Kentucky AUGUST 2014 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. HORIZON 2035 The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Louisville (KY-IN) Metropolitan Area AUGUST 2014 KIPDA Transportation Planning Division 11520 Commonwealth Drive Louisville, Kentucky 40299 502.266.6144 502.266.5047 FAX 800.962.8408 IN TDD 800.648.6056 KY TDD Email: [email protected] Website: www.kipda.org This document is available in accessible formats when requested in advance. This document is published by the Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency and is prepared in cooperation with and/or with financial assistance from all of several of the following public entities: the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, the Indiana Department of Transportation, the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, the Transit Authority of River City, and the local governments of the KIPDA region. This financial assistance notwithstanding, the contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the funding agencies. THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Plan & Project Development ........................................................................................................................
  • Ohio River Master Plan

    Ohio River Master Plan

    Louisville and Jefferson Ohio River Corridor County Comprehensive Plan Master Plan 1996 A project of the Livability Committee of Cornerstone 2020 Kentucky Chapter American Planning Association 1996 Honors Award Ohio River Corridor Master Plan Louisville and Jefferson County, Kentucky Several things bode well for the plan’s success. Its goals clearly coincide with prevailing community sentiment. ...The foundation for a cooperative effort is in place. ...The plan includes at least one idea almost every citizen can identify with. Editorial, Readers’ Forum The Courier Journal Monday, February 26, 1996 OHIO RIVER CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN CONTENTS Preface ................................................................................................... i 1. Vision Statement .............................................................................. 1 2. Key Concepts ................................................................................... 3 3. The Place Today (Existing Conditions and Trends) ..................... 19 4. The Plan ......................................................................................... 35 5. Policy Framework .......................................................................... 63 6. Implementation Strategy ............................................................... 81 Acknowledgements ............................................................................. 95 Figures Figure 1 Design Concept ......................................... Following Page 36 Figure 2 Southwest Sub-Area .................................
  • Cultural History of Twin Meadows Park

    Cultural History of Twin Meadows Park

    FINAL PUBLIC REPORT CULTURAL HISTORY OF TWIN MEADOWS PARK OSA Project No. FY09-5719 Prepared for: Twin Meadows Park Master Plan 2008 Lead Agency: Louisville Metro Parks P.O. Box 37280 Louisville Kentucky 40233 (502) 456-8100 Prime Consultant: Mike Smiley Environs, Inc. 11601 Main Street Middletown, KY 40243 Prepared By: Kathryn J. McGrath, Anne Tobbe Bader, and Sundea Murphy Corn Island Archaeology LLC P.O. Box 991259 Louisville, Kentucky 40269 Phone (502) 614-8828 FAX (502) 614-8940 [email protected] Project No. PR8020 Cultural Resources Report No. TR9002 _______________________________________________ (Signature) Anne Tobbe Bader, RPA Principal Investigator December 21, 2009 Cultural History of Twin Meadows Park Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS ................................................................................................................... 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Physiography ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Geological Resources .......................................................................................................................................................