DOCSLIB.ORG

Scanned Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scanned Document U.S. ARI\.IY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM CONGRESSIONAL SUBMISSION FISCAL YEAR 2000 REMAINING ITEMS Budgetary information will not be released outside the Departmen~ of the Army until 1 February 1999 Justification of Estimates for Civil Function Activities of the Fiscal Year 2000 of Table of Contents No. , KY 5 Columbus Area, OH 10 Duck River TN 21 Green and Barren Rivers Navigation KY 13 River Basin Environmental Monday Creek, OH 16 River Basin Environmental OH 17 Kanawha River WV 3 Kankakee River Basin, IL and IN 4 Licking River, , KY 6 Mercer County, WV 12 Metropolitan Louisville, Mill Creek Basin, KY 7 Metropolitan Louisville, Southwest, KY 8 Nolichucky Watershed, TN and NC 11 North TN 22 Ohio River Main Stem Study, KY, IL, IN, PA and OH 2 Lake, NY 15 Powell River VA 23 Tennessee River and Tributaries, Eastern Band Cherokee Nation, NC 9 Tennessee River and Tributaries, Macon County, NC 14 Turtle Creek Basin, Brush Creek Environmental 18 Turtle Creek Basin, Lyons Run Environmental Res 19 Turtle Creek Turtle Creek PA 20 Preconstruction and Ashtabula River Environmental , OH 28 Conemaugh River Nanty Glo Environmental Restoration, PA 29 Des Plaines River, IL 27 John T. Locks and Dam, KY and IN 25 River, OH 26 and Puckett Creeks, VA 30 IL 24 1 1999 i Justification of Estimates for Civil Function Activities of the Army, Fiscal Year 2000 Corps of No. Construction: Dam and Lake Barkley, KY and TN 148 Lake, Muskingum River Lakes, OH 161 Bluestone Lake, WV 36 Chicago and Ship Canal IL 153 Chicago Shoreline, IL 77 Lake, KY 157 Fort Area, IN 94 Johnstown, PA 167 Lock and Dam, Tennessee River, KY 49 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big River and Upper Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 132 Little Calumet River, IN 99 Locks and Dams 2, 3 and 4, Monongahela River, PA 57 London Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, WV 40 Marmet Locks and Dam, WV 62 McAlpine Locks and Dam, KY and IN 53 McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 87 Metropolitan Louisville, Pond KY 105 Region of Cincinnati, Duck OH llO Mill Creek, OH ll6 Olmsted Locks and Dam, IL and KY 45 Patoka Lake, IN 32 Isle Peninsula, PA 82 Robert C. Locks and Dam (formerly Gallipolis Locks and Dam), WV and OH 67 Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA 127 Tygart Lake, WV 172 West Columbus, OH 122 Winfield Locks and Dam, WV 72 and Maintenance: 176 1 1999 ii Justification of Estimates for Civil Function Activities of the Army, Corps of Fiscal Year 2000 SUMMARY, GREAT LAKES AND OHIO RIVER DIVISION Increase FY 1999 FY 2000 or Decrease General 17,082,000 12,797,000 -4,285,000 Preconstruction Engineering and 2,065,000 2,803,000 +738,000 Subtotal, General 19,147,000 15,600,000 -3,547,000 Construction General Construction 226,474,000 1/ 131,965,000 2/ -94,509,000 Dam Assurance 3,255,000 7,550,000 +4,295,000 Subtotal, Construction General 229,729,000 139,515,000 -90,214,000 and Maintenance Project 170,639,000 170,993,000 +354,000 ect Maintenance 147,44 000 183,821,000 +36,375,000 Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance 318,085,000 354,814,000 +36,729,000 Grand Total, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division 566,961,000 509,929,000 -57,032,000 1/ Includes an estimated 8,567,000 to be derived from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund in FY 1999. Includes an estimated $40,167,000 to be derived from the Inland Trust Fund in FY 2000. 1 February 1999 1 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS APPROPRIATION TITLE: General f Fiscal Year 2000 Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Total Allocation Tentative Additional Estimated Prior to Allocation Allocation to ete Study Federal Cost FY 1999 FY 1999 FY 2000 After 2000 $ $ $ $ $ 1. SURVEYS NEW: None. 2. SURVEYS - CONTINUING: a. Navigation Studies. Ohio River Main Stem terns 45,300,000 22,380,000 9,972,000 7,157,000 5,791,000 S KY, IL, IN, WV and OH District an inland to address the level of investments needed to an efficient on the River Main Stem. The study will identify the and maintenance, or or rehabilitation and new construction investment needs for locks and darns the Ohio and/or in the pools and channels controlled by these structures. structures are to the of navigation throughout the Ohio River Basin. As traffic through the Ohio River Valley, structures will , which may be times of maintenance (when chambers must be closed for or emergency or of the main locks in severe traffic For the ten years, traffic on the has grown at an annual average rate of 2.0 In 1996, total tonnage reached 239 million tons, increase over 1986. the economic, of both scale investments and small scale improvements could involve a third lock at certain facilities, chambers to at least two 1200' chambers where justified, or provision of facilities. scale improvements could include installation of mooring cells near (which could enhance tow mooring in situations and double-cut spare lock gates, new to up lock maintenance, tructure or that could be identi during the study. FY 1999 funds are used to level and maintenance cost the low cost plans, economic for the system, identify more studies, and begin NEPA (near future action) sites. FY 2000 funds will be used to finalize studies for up to 2 fie site continue level , and continue and economic The the January, 2003. 1 1999 2 APPROPRIATION TITLE: General , Fiscal Year 2000 Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Total Allocation Tentative Additional Estimated Prior to Allocation Allocation to Study Federal Cost FY 1999 FY 1999 FY 2000 After FY 2000 $ $ $ $ $ Kanawha River WV 12,992,000 11,670,000 672,000 650,000 0 Huntington District The Kanawha Ohio River, has a total area of about 12,300 square miles within southern West Vi , and a small portion of northwestern North Carolina. A nine-foot navigation channel maintained 91 miles by Marmet and London Locks and Dams on the Kanawha, and Robert c. Locks and Dam River. The Kanawha River projects, 60 years old, have small dual-chambered 360 foot 56 foot locks restrict the use of modern, efficient A new lock 800 foot 110 foot been at The Marmet Interim which was in December 1993 recommended construction of a new 800 foot by 110 foot lock. The ect has been authorized for construction. An interim for London Locks and Dam was recommended that a major rehabilitation of the ect be the guard The also recommended that the riverward chamber during as an improvement measure. of the final for the Kanawha River Navigation studies is currently under way. These studies will other factors navigation along the Kanawha River and will include a ive evaluation of environmental resulting from recommended improvements to the Kanawha River navigation These studies will include state of the art modeling and evaluation techniques for the assessment of all related FY 1999 funds are used to continue studies for the Kanawha River System FY 1999 activities include ronmental studies, initiation of system mitigation planning, and for environmental restoration opportunities. FY 2000 funds will be used to complete these of the Kanawha River Final Report by September 2000. TOTAL: Navigation Studies 58,292,000 34,050,000 10,644,000 7,807,000 5,791,000 1 1999 3 APPROPRIATION TITLE: General , Fiscal Year 2000 Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Total Allocation Tentative Additional Estimated Prior to Allocation Allocation to Federal Cost FY 1999 FY 1999 FY 2000 After FY 2000 $ $ $ $ $ b. Flood Prevention Studies. Kankakee River Basin, IL and IN 1,700,000 345,000 407,000 295,000 653,000 Chicago District The Kankakee River Basin covers 5,200 square miles in northeastern Illinois and northwestern Indiana. More than one million live within the in. Local officials from both Indiana and Illinois have a evaluation of basin-wide flooding problems. The flooding problems throughout the basin have increased in frequency and through time. Additionally, ice is a routine occurrence the river, a number of communities and or structural Sedimentation within the a contributing factor to increased over time. As a result, a of the problems and development of a basin-wide, solution will be required to reduce The s is concentrating on flood damage but is also considering ecosystem, erosion control and management. Possible solutions include levees, sedimentation traps, selective dredging, and wetland restoration. The two states, local communities and the Kankakee River Basin Commission have support for the study and the Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement is scheduled to be executed in FY 1999 funds will be used to continue the feasibility phase. FY 2000 funds will be used to continue the The preliminary estimated cost of the feasibility phase is $3,200,000 which is to be shared on a 50- by Federal and non-Federal interests. Up to one half of the non-Federal share may be in-kind services. summary of the cost sharing is as follows: Total Estimated Study Cost $3,300,000 Reconnaissance Phase {Federal) 100,000 Phase (Federal) 1,600,000 Feasibility Phase (Non-Federal) 1,600,000 The reconnaissance is scheduled for completion in April 1999. The study is scheduled for in 2001. 1 1999 4 APPROPRIATION TITLE: General I I Fiscal Year 2000 Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Total Allocation Tentative Additional Estimated Prior to Allocation Allocation to Study Federal Cost FY 1999 FY 1999 FY 2000 After $ $ $ $ ta, KY 700,000 100,000 117 f 000 150,000 333,000 Huntington District The of in Bracken County, Kentucky, on the left des bank of the Ohio River 427 miles downstream of The City extends the Ohio River for about 1-1/4 miles west of Bracken Creek with 80 o its area, including the s and residential sections and two small industrial situated on the Ohio flood plain.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan Volume 4: Ohio River Flood Protection
    20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan Volume 4: Ohio River Flood Protection In Association with: NAC | K.S. Ware & Associates | RKX | Powers Engineering June 2017 20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan Volume 4: Ohio River Flood Protection In Association with: NAC | K.S. Ware & Associates | RKX | Powers Engineering June 2017 CH2M One Riverfront Plaza 401 West Main Street Suite 800 Louisville, KY 40202 O +1 502-584-6052 www.ch2m.com Angela L. Akridge, PE, Chief Engineer Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District 700 West Liberty Street Louisville, KY 40203 June 30, 2017 Subject: 20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan—Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan Dear Ms. Akridge, The attached 20-Year Comprehensive Facility Plan, also referred to as the Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD) Critical Repair and Reinvestment Plan, represents MSD’s most ambitious planning effort in a decade. The 2-year effort reviewed the challenges our community faces now and in the future, identified practical solutions, and developed a roadmap to protect the health, economic vitality, and environment of our city. The recommendations in this Facility Plan are the result of careful evaluation by the Facility Plan Team, which includes some of the most experienced engineers in Louisville Metro. We believe that the recommendations presented in this Facility Plan are essential to maintaining reliable facilities that will allow MSD to fulfill its responsibility for safe, clean waterways and help preserve and promote our competitiveness as a city. One driver that led to Facility Plan development was a recognition that—for the past 10 years—MSD has focused much of its resources and investments on tackling the federally mandated undertaking to reduce sewer overflows.
    [Show full text]
  • Notable Local Floods of 1942-43
    Notable Local Floods of 1942-43 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1134 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1952 CONTENTS The letters in parenthesis preceding the titles are those used to designate the separate chapters] Page (A) Flood of August 4-5, 1943, in central West Virginia, by H. M. Erskine. 1 (B) Floods of July 18, 1942, in north-central Pennsylvania, by William S. Eisenlohr, Jr________________________________________________ 59 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE 1. Map of West Virginia showing location of points where flood determinations were made__________--_-_--__-_-_-_--__-_ 48 2. Map of flood area showing locations of stream-gaging stations, rainfall-measurement points, and isohyetal lines for July 17-18, 1942-____-___________________-___-______--_-_-____- In pocket FIGURE 1. Map of West Virginia showing location of Little Kanawha River basin_________________________-__-__--_-_---_-_ 2 2. Residence of Yeager family, which was flooded. ____________ 5 3. Residence, near Heaters, which was washed dowiistream_____ 6 4. Washed-out railroad bridge on Copen Run _________________ 6 5. Washed-out fill on State Route 5 at Jobs Run______________ 7 6. Rock and mud deposit from a hillside wash________________ 7 7. Typical sand and gravel deposits__________________________ 8 8. Typical hillside erosion_____________________-_____-__--__ 8 9. Cornfield destroyed by flood. _--_____________-__-__-_-__- 9 10. Isohyetal map of Little Kanawha River basin showing total rainfall July 26-30, 1943__________________--_-____--- 10 11. Isohyetal map of Little Kanawha River basin showing total rainfall August 4-5, 1943__ ______________-___-_--__--__ 13 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Wayne National Forest Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture Assessment Wayne National Forest Forest Wayne National Forest Plan Service Forest Revision July 2020 Prepared By: Forest Service Wayne National Forest 13700 US Highway 33 Nelsonville, OH 45764 Responsible Official: Forest Supervisor Carrie Gilbert Abstract: The Assessment presents and evaluates existing information about relevant ecological, economic and social conditions, trends, risks to sustainability, and context within the broader landscape and relationship to the 2006 Wayne National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (the forest plan). Cover Photo: The Wayne National Forest headquarters and welcome center. USDA photo by Kyle Brooks The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAVELTIME and DISPERSION DATA for the KANAWHA RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA, 1989 by D.H. Appel U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report
    TRAVELTIME AND DISPERSION DATA FOR THE KANAWHA RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA, 1989 By D.H. Appel U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 91-57 Prepared in cooperation with the MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION and the VIRGINIA ENVIRONMENTAL ENDOWMENT Charleston, West Virginia 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Dire ptor For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books a.nd Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division Box 25425 603 Morris Street Denver Federal Center Charleston, WV 24301 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract .......................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................... 2 Purpose and scope ............................................. 2 Acknowledgments ............................................... 5 Field procedures .................................................. 5 Traveltime and dispersion data .................................... 7 August 1989 ................................................... 7 October 1989 .................................................. 7 References cited .................................................. 16 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing the Kanawha River study area ............... 3 2. Graph showing Kanawha River profile, navigable section .................................... 4 TABLES Page Table 1. Distance, in river miles, to selected sites
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Master Plan for Phase IV
    PHPHASE IV CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN REPORT July 2014 Client Louisville Metro Waterfront Development Corporation Stakeholders Cheri Bryant Hamilton, Metro Council David Tandy, Metro Council Rep. Darryl T. Owens Cathy Shannon Pierre Spaulding Nathalie Andrews Mary Turner Rick Bell Pat Mulvihill Gill Holland Rebecca Matheny, LDP Clark Welch, LDP John Swintosky, Metro Parks Lisa Hite, Metro Parks Myra Friend Ellis, Metro Council Dale Corum, Mercer Transportation Patti Clare, Louisville Metro Grechen Milliken, Louisville Metro Bill Gatewood Ellen Hesen Marty Storch Diane Stampel Master Planning Team David Karem, President WDC Michael Kimmel, Vice-President WDC Margaret Walker, WDC Gary Pepper, WDC Andrew Knight, PLA, ASLA MKSK Boyd Sewe, Intern, MKSK LOUISVILLE WATERFRONT PARK PHASE IV Master Plan Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description 1.2 Planning and Design Process TWO GROUNDING / OBSERVATION & RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 Site History 2.2 Site Context 2.3 Existing Site Conditions 2.4 Site Analysis 2.5 Best Practice Exploration 2.6 Programming THREE DESIGN MOTIVATION 3.1 Design Motivations: Views, One Riverfront, Ecotone 3.2 Building the Diagram FOUR MASTER PLAN 4.1 Phase 4 Master Plan 4.2 Master Plan Alternatives FIVE COMPONENT PLANS 5.1 Foundry Commons 5.2 Foundry Gardens 5.3 Confluence Plaza 5.4 Fort-on-Shore Plaza 5.5 Railyard Plaza 5.6 Picnic Grove 5.7 Midway 5.8 Exerscape 5.9 Lowland Boardwalk 5.10 Waterfront Promenade 5.11 River Road Streetscape SIX PLAN OF ACTION 6.1 Phasing Diagram 6.2 Estimated Project Budget LOUISVILLE WATERFRONT PARK PHASE IV Master Plan Report 3 LOUISVILLE WATERFRONT PARK PHASE IV Master Plan Report 4 INTRODUCTION 1 WHAT: PROJECT DESCRIPTION WHY: PURPOSE OF THE MASTER PLAN HOW: THE MASTER PLANNING STUDY PROCESS This Master Plan Report focuses on Phase IV of the catalytic Waterfront Waterfront Park Phase IV is viewed as a continuum of the River City Grounding: Park in downtown Louisville.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Buffalo Bridge Buffalo, West Virginia
    Merit Award: Long Span Lower Buffalo Bridge Buffalo, West Virginia This $21.8 million project con- nects US 35 to WV62 over the Kanawha River near Buffalo, West Virginia. The bridge site is in the Kanawha Valley of Putnam County, West Virginia, halfway between Charleston, the state’s capital and largest city, and Huntington, the sec- ond largest city in the state. The broad Kanawha Valley is surrounded by rolling hills and dotted with farm- ing communities and newer subur- ban areas. Although Putnam County is one of the fastest growing counties in the state of West Virginia, there was no bridge crossing the Kanawha River within miles of Buffalo. The new Lower Buffalo Bridge opens up some of the best land in the state to economic development and provides a direct connection to a new US 35 upgrade under construction and I- 64. The bridge had to be completed and open to traffic by mid-1998 to allow for the new Toyota manufacturing facility in Buffalo to ship state-of-the-art engines. The bridge also had to span the naviga- ble Kanawha River with minimal false- work and span over areas on both banks with known archeological deposits. Environmental Concerns The flood plain area at the Lower Buffalo Bridge site is an established archeological dig site with numerous Native American campsites and artifacts. An environmental consultant for the West Virginia Department of Transportation (WVDOT) performed both phase one and phase two archeo- logical surveys at the proposed bridge site and identified archeologically sensitive areas on both riverbanks. Construction activity for a new bridge over these sensi- tive areas was limited to the depth of cul- tivation (about 30”).
    [Show full text]
  • MONDAY CREEK WATERSHED 1 298,935,000 Gallons Per Year
    MONDAY CREEK WATERSHED MONDAY CREEK WATERSHED Generated by Non-Point Source Monitoring System www.watersheddata.com Generated by Non-Point Source Monitoring System www.watersheddata.com • Monday Creek, located in the Appalachian Region of southeastern Ohio, is a 27-mile long tributary of the Hocking River, the lat- ter which flows directly into the Ohio River. The Monday Creek Watershed drains a 116 square-mile area, with streams winding Grimmett Hollow through portions of Athens, Hocking, and Perry Counties. • Our project is a collaborative partnership Jobs Hollow Doser of officials and residents of the Monday Creek watershed, along with more than 20 other organizations and state and federal agencies. Our shared goal is to restore the Rock Run Gob Pile watershed for the benefit of local commu- Rock Run 24 nities. Large portions of Monday Creek and its tributaries are dead due to acid mine drainage (AMD) left behind from a century Essex Doser of coal mining. • Since 1994, our partnership has worked together to identify water quality problems, conduct field research and site characteriza- tion, and prioritize and plan on-going res- Lost Run Phase I toration activities. The MCRP has completed the reclamation of the Rock Run gob pile in southern Perry County through an EPA Section 319 grant and is beginning another project in the headwaters of Jobs Hollow through 319. Big Four Hollow • In 1997-1998, we identified issues to be addressed for the long-term improvement Snake Hollow of the watershed, and to the benefit of lo- cal communities. These issues, along with goals, objectives, action strategies, and progress indicators are discussed in detail in the Monday Creek Comprehensive Manage- ment Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Department of Natural Resources - Division of Mineral Resources Management 1 Summary of AMD Treatment
    Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage in Huff Run, Sunday, Monday, Leading and Raccoon Creek Watersheds, Ohio Ben McCament Abandoned Mine Land Program, ODNR Division of Mineral Resources Management March 21st, 2018 Background The first reported production of coal in Ohio was in 1800, three years prior to Ohio’s entrance as the 17th state. By 1806 there reports of coal mining in 3 counties in the state (Crowell, 1995). Early coal production was minimal during the early 1800’s and it wasn’t until the mid-1800’s that mining began booming. Peak mining occurred in 1918, employing a work force of more than 50,000 (Crowel, 1995). Most of this mining was utilizing underground methods until the mid-1900’s when surface mining became the dominant method. By the time Ohio passed the Ohio Strip Mine Law in 1972 and the Surface Mine Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) passed in 1977 there had been a century and a half of coal mining with no or little environmental regulations. Most coal mining occurred in the 26 counties in the southeast and eastern part of the state, in the Appalachian foothills. Many streams and entire watersheds were severely impaired by acid mine drainage (AMD) from abandoned mines. In the mid 1990’s ODNR began a program to address AMD from abandoned mines and attempted to restore impacted watersheds. Acid Mine Drainage Abatement and Treatment (AMDAT) plans were developed and provided access to Abandoned Mine Land (AML) funds through the AMD Set-aside program. These funds can also leverage other local, state and federal grant funds for treatment and abatement projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Rivers Water Trail Access • Row Boats Or Sculls Points Are Available for Public Use
    WHAT IS A WATER TRAIL? Is kayaking strenuous? Water trails are recreational waterways on lakes, rivers or Kayaking can be a great workout, or a relaxing day spent oceans between specific points, containing access points floating or casually paddling on the river. and day-use and camping sites (where appropriate) for the boating public. Water trails emphasize low-impact use and What should I wear? promote resource stewardship. Explore this unique Pennsylvania water trail. Whatever you’re comfortable in! You should not expect to get excessively wet, but non-cotton materials that dry quickly are Three Rivers WHAT TYPES OF PADDLE-CRAFT? best. Consider dressing in layers, and wear shoes that will stay on your feet. • Kayaks • Canoes How do I use the storage racks? • Paddle boards Water Trail The storage racks at many Three Rivers Water Trail access • Row boats or sculls points are available for public use. These are not intended for long term storage. Store “at your own risk.” Using a lock you FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: are comfortable with is recommended. Is it safe for beginners to paddle on the river? Flat-water kayaking, canoeing, or paddle boarding is perfect for beginners. It is easy to learn with just a Map & Guide few minutes of instruction. RUL THREE RIVERS E S & Friends of the Riverfront, founded in 1991, is WATER TRAIL dedicated to the development and stewardship of the Three Rivers Heritage Trail and Three R Developed by Friends of the Riverfront Rivers Water Trail in the Pittsburgh region. This EG PENNSYLVANIA BOATING REGULATIONS guide is provided so that everyone can enjoy the natural amenities that makes the Pittsburgh • A U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regulations JANUARY - DECEMBER 2004
    WEST VIRGINIA Fishing Regulations JANUARY - DECEMBER 2004 West Virginia Division of Natural Resources D I Investment in a Legacy --------------------------- S West Virginia’s anglers enjoy a rich sportfishing legacy and conservation ethic that is maintained T through their commitment to our state’s fishery resources. Recognizing this commitment, the R Division of Natural Resources endeavors to provide a variety of quality fishing opportunities to meet I increasing demands, while also conserving and protecting the state’s valuable aquatic resources. One way that DNR fulfills this part of its mission is through its fish hatchery programs. Many anglers are C aware of the successful trout stocking program and the seven coldwater hatcheries that support this T important fishery in West Virginia. The warmwater hatchery program, although a little less well known, is still very significant to West Virginia anglers. O West Virginia’s warmwater hatchery program has been instrumental in providing fishing opportunities F to anglers for more than 60 years. For most of that time, the Palestine State Fish Hatchery was the state’s primary facility dedicated to the production of warmwater fish. Millions of walleye, muskellunge, channel catfish, hybrid striped bass, saugeye, tiger musky, and largemouth F and smallmouth bass have been raised over the years at Palestine and stocked into streams, rivers, and lakes across the state. I A recent addition to the DNR’s warmwater hatchery program is the Apple Grove State Fish Hatchery in Mason County. Construction of the C hatchery was completed in 2003. It was a joint project of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the DNR as part of a mitigation agreement E for the modernization of the Robert C.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Report Cover Sheet Jan07
    VILLAGE OF WOODVILLE SANDUSKY COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE Independent Auditor’s Report ....................................................................................................................... 1 Combined Statement of Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in Fund Balances (Cash Basis) - All Governmental Fund Types For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 ................................................................................................... 3 Combined Statement of Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in Fund Balances (Cash Basis) - Proprietary Fund Type For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 .................................................................................................... 4 Notes to the Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2015 ................................................ 5 Combined Statement of Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in Fund Balances (Cash Basis) - All Governmental Fund Types For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 .................................................................................................. 22 Combined Statement of Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in Fund Balances (Cash Basis) - Proprietary Fund Type For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 .................................................................................................. 23 Notes to the Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 .............................................. 24 Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T.
    [Show full text]