Joel Document Fifth Panzer Ar.My, Appendices to WD 9

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joel Document Fifth Panzer Ar.My, Appendices to WD 9 JOel H.S. Number Document -Para 981PA5 (D.5) Fifth Panzer Ar.my, 28f Appendices to W.D. 9 Aug - 9 Sep 44 Corps 88 Corps, W.D. 35, 1 Ju1 - 31 Dec 44 88 Corps, W.D. 14lf 1 Jul - 31 Dec 44, Vol "B" of Apps 88 Corps, W.D. 1 Jul - 31 Dec 44, Vol ;'C" of Apps B. Secondary Sources 981S0M(DI72) Blauensteiner, 36 2 Para Corps, 19 Sep 44 - 10 Mar 45 981S0M(D208) Hammer, 58 Report on 190 Inf Div 98IAGpG(DI) von Mel1enthin, 65f A Gp G,' 20 Sep - 8 Nov 44 Schramm, Der Westen, -- (ses: Primary Sources) 981S0M(DI48) Student, 34 SUpplement to Report by Col Geyer 981S0M(D94) Zimmermann , llf 65f O.B. Wast from Atlantic Wall to Siegfriod LinG, ItA StUdy in COIr.J.lland 11 XXII Books u.s. Army, Military 14f 33, Intelligence Division, Washington, 1945, Order of Battle of the German krmy Westphal, Siegfried 93 The German Army in the West Wilmot, Chester 30f The Struggle for Europe Appendix "A" Prig.eipa1 Appointments in the West (Autumn 1944) Ref: para 7 Appendix tlB" O.B. West Order of Battle 1,5 Aug 44 • 981.04,5 (D1) , Ref: para 10 Appendix "G" F6h.rer Order to hold or destroy Paris 23 Ayg 44 981AG:pB (D2) Ref: :para 17 Appendix "D" F'!hrer Order of 25 Sep 44 98J.AGpB(D2) • Ref: para 70 tPpYnd:l,;x: "F" o - JSI Report No. 77 OKW!WFSt Directive to O.B. West 29 Oct 44 981HC-N(D16) Raf: para 102 Appendix "Aft PRnJC,IPAL APP,OIN'n.fENTS ,IN TIlli VmST (tor period under review) O.B. WEST (until 8 Nov 44 also known as A Gp D) 3 Jill 44 ~ 17 Aug 44 GFM Guenther von Kluge 17 Aug 44 ~ 4 Sep 44 GFM Walter Model 4 Sep 44 - 10 Mar 45 G~1 Gerd von Rundstedt ARMY GROUPS .L\rp1Y Group B 31 Dec 43*~ 17 Aug 44 GFM Erwin Rommel 17 Aug 44 - 17 Apr 45 GFM Walter Model ",\t:mY Group G 10 May 44 " 21 Sep 44 Col Gen Johannes Blask6witz 21 Sep 44 - 23 Dec 44 Gan pz Tps Hermann Balck Army Group Studen (prov) I 31 Oct 44 - 10 Nov 44 Col Gen Kurt Student Arm;r Group H 10 Nov 44 - 28 Jan 45 Col Gen Kurt Student ArnJIIES . First lirmy 2 Jun 44 ... 6Sep 44 Gen Inf Kurt von der Ohevallerie 6 Sep 44 '­ 29 Oct 44 Gen pz Tps Otto von Knobelsdorff 29 Oct 44 ... 1 Dec 44 Gen Tnf Kurt von Tippelskiroh 1 Deo 44 - 22 Mar 45 Gen Inf Hans von Obstfelder * . Date on which upgraded from a working staff to oommand (under O.B. West): 88 Corps {Netherlands), Fifteenth Army and Seventh Army. ·1 , - 2 - ~~venth Army 29 Jun 44 ~ 23 Aug 44 SS Gen Paul Hausser 24 Aug 44 " 31 Aug 44 Gen pz Tps Heinrich Eberbach 31 Aug 44 - 19 Feb 45 Gen pz Tps Erich Brandenberger Fifteenth Army 15 Aug 43 ~ 23 Aug 44 Col Gen Hans von Salmuth 23 Aug 44 - 17 Apr 45 Gen Tnf Gustav von Zangen ·~ineteanth Army 29 Jun 44 - 15 Dec 44 Gen Tnf Friedrioh Wiese Fifth Panzer ArmY, 9 Aug 44 ~ 10 Sap 44 SS Col Gen Sapp Dietrich 10 Sap 44 ~ Early 1945 Gen pz Tps Hasso-Eccard von Manteuffel Sixth Panzer Army 13 Sep 44 - May 1945 SS 601 C~n Sepp Dietrich First Parachute ~1rmy ·4 Sep 44 - 31 Oot 44 Col Gen Kurt Student 31 Oot 44 - 28 Mar 45 Gen Para Tps Alfred Sohlermn Armed Forces Commander Netherlands 1 Sap 44 - 26 Jan 45 Gan G.A.F. Karl Friedrich Christiansen FU "l:S TI~ TTLE U y 15 AUG 44 CORPS OK. • 88 (Com of German !pa 01:. in the Bether1aDda) 70 (16S Bea), 712 89 IS 4.7, JB-{xxx), 4.9xD, 182 Res 82 1,;6••• JIt.8, 145, 226, 5 Seourity ~gt 711, ]It&, 272, JD.te 710 Portre_ Cueruel 86 319 85, 12 SS PZ, 89 "f SS PZ Spz ~tre_St~ 74 (Col ~ aleck) ') ., .., 9 SS PZ, 3 Para .1 .nb n '- SS "- _ab 91 Lehr, 353 + EIta 1 SS pz Klta S Pua Gp .36:S ... Blta »l PA A Portn_ .... c.p 2l,.3. 8lt., Battle c.p 17 55 PZ Gren, Jfa1Jl -.q ,.., Batua·Gp 275, BIta 10 55 Pa 10 SS Ps•••• 84 BI sata 2 Jlu'a u.266 "aanta 5 Para, nta 9 Pa, 2 SS Pa 7 58 PI !Wtz... Ler1u.l Uta 9 Ps, 2 Ps, RellDants pz Lehr*." 2S oerpa ".nta 9 P& 47 PZ K1ta &8 • 2I6S Battl. Gp 6 Para, 81 Portre•• St. ".'ire '52 AR EEGRUPPE Blt. B.e-.nta 265 ), BJ.ocking Pormation aa.cte1, 159 lie. 64 B 8D aad 66 Col'h 19a----, 189 Be....• 4 L .' F. 8 + 62 , 'lOF,e. I I I I I I I I Appendix "D" FUhrer Order of 25 Sep 44 (Translation) The enemy has transferred the rna. in weight of his attaoks to the Dutch area and the forefield of the Northern Vosges. In the South the available foroes have been oommitted on' the whole, but in England he has still large fornations ­ including airborne divisions - to exploit and expand suooess in Southern Holland by further landings from the air and fr~ the sea in western and northern Holland, or possibly even in Gerr~y between WilhelmBhaven and Emden. The oentre of gravity of our oounter-measures must therefore be transferred to the northern area of the western front, to hold the Netherlands and make possible the oompletion of the West Wall extension, .thereby protecting the Ruhr area. My orders are: 1. The enemy in the Arnhem - Nijmegen area is to be destroyed by conoentrio attaok. The fooal point of this attack must be between Waal and Maas in order to take the Nijmegen-Grave road, thereby preventing a further reinforoing of the enemy north of the Maas. The southern front of Fifteenth Army and the western front of First Paraohute ~\rmy must be held at present lines. The enemy bridgehead aoross the oanal south of Helmond is to be eliminated or seourely sealed-off at least. The gap at the inner wings of Fifteenth f~y and First Parachute ~tr.my at Veghel is to be olosed by means of a ooncentric attack in order to meet the preliminary requirement for the destruotion of the enew~ north of the Maas. 4. Army Group G will stand fast forward of the Vosges poaition thereby winning by fighting the time required for the completion of that position as well as of the Vosges Battle-position. The long and unprepared triangle of the Western position from south of Metz via Falkenberg, Pftttlingen to Elamont is completely unsuitable for defence. In order to be· able to oonduct mobile operations in the area Duss - Nomeny -.Luneville all panzer and panzer grenadier divisions as well as the panzer brigades presently under the i~y Group are to remain with it. The assembly of a mobile reserve also behind the Nineteenth i~y is necessary (sic). For the attaok of First Parachute f~ny between Waal and Maas, .108 pz Bde 1 741 Ry A Tk En and .506 Tiger En are to be moved-·in, furthermore also 116 and 9 pz Divs, the latter two to be relieved by Fortress Ens and, if necessary, by moving-in 246 Inf Div. 2 6. The Chief of Army Equipment and CODwlander of the Replacement Training l~y has been instructed to move strong forces into the area WilhelmShaven ­ Leeuwarden - Apelaoorn - Rheine. Orders concerning this and further work on the western Position and the West Wall will follow. 7£ Operational Intentions and Dispositions are to be reported. Adolf Hitler • .. .., h.", • '.. • ... ~ ~ .. r 1 t t • ,.U_•• 4 .m,' • c • Y. " •• ALt J': J~ er.. h.rer ~o • n' r .' :at· 1. : !:. 4 ..4r.lPlth • • I . 1 - • J • ., 1&'" - A,e1 teble e" lin. 18 bllftt......U .... 11 Imu...• O. B. WElT- (" GIl 0 )or PERIODI CM- SCHBIATI C ORDERS OF BATRE OF GERMAN ARM IES. SECT I ON OF ~ART. r A~Q F~CES HIGH C(JAUAND .r r-..r...r--.r CORi-~ t • 85~, B~ttle 7l1~, ?lg~ 64', ?Q¢, Gp 346¢, 61 88 '15 Battle Group 712~ H.,. 344 -----~--- 89 .J ... 363 V.Gr. 12 55 9 Pl., B Battle Group 9 3S Fl., Battle ~roup 10 SS f~ 2 5S PZ Dl•• po. 406%%, Battle Group 84, Div No.l0QxX I PARA 2 PARA : i v. 110: !e6 Battle Group Nalter (107 pz Bde), 3 itara xX Di .No. 180, Div. 10. 176 86 5 • 5 • undergoing 183 V.J~, ~~ts 4911, 116 Pz, 108 pz Bde 1 5S PZ rehabilitation o 246 V.Gr, 12 V.Gr. 81 - --- ---t 347~ 256 V.Cr. 275-, 89, Bettle Group 1~ 7 ~61 V.Gr. cta 1 55 PZ Remts 12--SS- ~Div.NO.172x~, f ttle Group ~ ~ rz, Battle Group 2 ~z 66 36 V.GI@ D- --------.--~---~ ---- s 1 ul taneotl 1J Z5 8Z ----------- 7 SS pz Gr, R~mts 553 V.Gr, 559 v.Gr, t8 1~ I 15 rz Gr 1"'"""----------- Z 19S1e: 9 106 pz Bde static, ~ wi thout Asslt GlUl Bn I 1.., ld - (Ie,rIIILD ~iv19ions ~~th tr-e prefix -No.- .. ". OKW/WFst D'ire,ctive to O.B,. West (29 Oct 44) 1'., The Ftnlrer expects Fifteenth ~'\.rmy to stand tast with all its power in the present main line of resistance along the line Bergen op Zoom ~ Breda ..
Recommended publications
  • 01 Hst 1-3 Nieuw.Indd 1 15-10-19 16:15 01 Hst 1-3 Nieuw.Indd 2 15-10-19 16:15 Hitlers Parachutistengeneraal Kurt Student (1890-1978): Een Militaire Biografie
    Hitlers parachutistengeneraal 01 hst 1-3 nieuw.indd 1 15-10-19 16:15 01 hst 1-3 nieuw.indd 2 15-10-19 16:15 Hitlers parachutistengeneraal Kurt Student (1890-1978): een militaire biografie Wouter van den Brandhof Hilversum Verloren 2019 01 hst 1-3 nieuw.indd 3 15-10-19 16:15 De publicatie van dit boek werd mede mogelijk gemaakt door financiële bijdragen van de J.E. Jurriaanse Stichting te Rotterdam, de G.Ph. Verhagen-Stichting te Rot- terdam, de M.A.O.C. Gravin van Bylandt Stichting te ’s-Gravenhage, de gemeente Aalten en AVG Explosieven Opsporing Nederland. Afbeeldingen op het omslag. Voorzijde: de grote foto is een persfoto van het Cle- veland News met daarop afgebeeld Kurt Student, 10 april 1945; kleine foto’s v.l.n.r. Fallschirmjäger te Gennep, 20 september 1944, propagandafoto van het Derde Rijk met daarop afgebeeld een Fallschirmjäger, 11 februari 1939, Student op Kreta tij- dens Unternehmen Merkur, 1941. Achterzijde v.l.n.r. het verwoeste Rotterdam na het bombardement van 14 mei 1940, luchtlandingen van Fallschirmjäger nabij Dordrecht, meidagen 1940, een neergekomen Duits transporttoestel in de regio Delft, meidagen 1940. Bronnen: Beeldbank WO2-niod, Bundesarchiv/Vrijheids- museum Groesbeek en collectie Wouter van den Brandhof Nijmegen. isbn 978 90 8704 817 4 Dit is de handelseditie van een proefschrift verschenen aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. © 2019 Wouter van den Brandhof Uitgeverij Verloren Torenlaan 25, 1211 ja Hilversum www.verloren.nl Omslagontwerp: Studio Verloren Layout: Rombus, Hilversum Druk: Wilco, Amersfoort No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been Used to Photo­ Graph and Reproduce This Manuscript from the Microfilm Master
    . INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6"X 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Accessing theUMI World’s Information since 1938 300 North Z eeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8820321 Operational art and the German command system in World War I Meyer, Bradley John, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1988 Copyright ©1088 by Meyer, Bradley John. All rights reserved. UMI 300 N. ZeebRd. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 OPERATIONAL ART AND THE GERMAN COMMAND SYSTEM IN WORLD WAR I DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Bradley J.
    [Show full text]
  • Order of Battle, Mid-September 1940 Army Group a Commander-In-Chief
    Operation “Seelöwe” (Sea Lion) Order of Battle, mid-September 1940 Army Group A Commander-in-Chief: Generalfeldmarschall Gerd von Rundstedt Chief of the General Staff: General der Infanterie Georg von Sodenstern Operations Officer (Ia): Oberst Günther Blumentritt 16th Army Commander-in-Chief: Generaloberst Ernst Busch Chief of the General Staff: Generalleutnant Walter Model Operations Officer (Ia): Oberst Hans Boeckh-Behrens Luftwaffe Commander (Koluft) 16th Army: Oberst Dr. med. dent. Walter Gnamm Division Command z.b.V. 454: Charakter als Generalleutnant Rudolf Krantz (This staff served as the 16th Army’s Heimatstab or Home Staff Unit, which managed the assembly and loading of all troops, equipment and supplies; provided command and logistical support for all forces still on the Continent; and the reception and further transport of wounded and prisoners of war as well as damaged equipment. General der Infanterie Albrecht Schubert’s XXIII Army Corps served as the 16th Army’s Befehlsstelle Festland or Mainland Command, which reported to the staff of Generalleutnant Krantz. The corps maintained traffic control units and loading staffs at Calais, Dunkirk, Ostend, Antwerp and Rotterdam.) FIRST WAVE XIII Army Corps: General der Panzertruppe Heinric h-Gottfried von Vietinghoff genannt Scheel (First-wave landings on English coast between Folkestone and New Romney) – Luftwaffe II./Flak-Regiment 14 attached to corps • 17th Infantry Division: Generalleutnant Herbert Loch • 35th Infantry Division: Generalleutnant Hans Wolfgang Reinhard VII Army
    [Show full text]
  • Airpower in the Battle of the Bulge: a Case for Effects-‐‑Based Operations?
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies Airpower in the Battle of the Bulge: A Case for Effects-Based Operations? Harold R. Winton ȱ ȱ dzȱ ¢ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ throughout are those of a campaign on land in which the primary problem at the time is the defeat of an enemy army in the field.1 J.C. Slessor, 1936 ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ Ȃȱ work, Air Power and Armies, the published version of lectures he presented to his army brethren at the Staff College, Camberley in the mid-ŗşřŖǯȱ ȱ Ȃȱ ǰȱ ȱ paper is focused historically on an air effort to defeat an enemy army, or in this case an army groupȯField Marshal ȱȂȱ¢ȱ ȱǰȱȱȱȱ to which Adolf Hitler entrusted his last, desperate gamble to win World War IIȯa campaign that became known in history as the Battle of the Bulge. But in keeping with ȱ ȱ ȱ ȃ ȱ ǰȄȱ t will relate the course and consequences of that campaign to an ongoing doctrinal debate in the American armed forces over a concept known as Effects-Based Operations, or EBO. The issue on the table is to determine the 1 J.C. Slessor, Air Power and Armies (London: Oxford University Press, 1936), p. xi. ©Centre of Military and Strategic Studies, 2011 ISSN : 1488-559X JOURNAL OF MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES extent to which the evidence of using airpower in the Bulge confirms, qualifies, or refutes the tenets of EBO. While this question may seem somewhat arcane, it is not without consequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Patton Photographs
    Fighting Patton Photographs [A]Mexican Punitive Expedition pershing-villa-obregon.tif: Patton’s first mortal enemy was the commander of Francisco “Pancho” Villa’s bodyguard during the Mexican Punitive Expedition. Left to right: General Álvaro Obregón, Villa, Brig. Gen. John Pershing, Capt. George Patton. [A]World War I Patton_France_1918.tif: Col. George Patton with one of his 1st Tank Brigade FT17s in France in 1918. Diepenbroick-Grüter_Otto Eitel_Friedrich.tif: Prince Freiherr von.tif: Otto Freiherr Friedrich Eitel commanded the von Diepenbroick-Grüter, 1st Guards Division in the pictured as a cadet in 1872, Argonnes. commanded the 10th Infantry Division at St. Mihiel. Gallwitz_Max von.tif: General Wilhelm_Crown Prince.tif: Crown der Artillerie Max von Prince Wilhelm commanded the Gallwitz’s army group defended region opposite the Americans. the St. Mihiel salient. [A]Morocco and Vichy France Patton_Hewitt.tif: Patton and Rear Admiral Henry Kent Hewitt, commanding Western Naval Task Force, aboard the Augusta before invading Vichy-controlled Morocco in Operation Torch. NoguesLascroux: Arriving at Fedala to negotiate an armistice at 1400 on 11 November 1942, Gen. Charles Noguès (left) is met by Col. Hobart Gay. Major General Auguste Lahoulle, Commander of French Air Forces in Morocco, is on the right. Major General Georges Lascroux, Commander in Chief of Moroccan troops, carries a briefcase. Noguès_Charles.tif: Charles Petit_Jean.tif: Jean Petit, Noguès, was Vichy commander- commanded the garrison at in-chief in Morocco. Port Lyautey. (Courtesy of Stéphane Petit) [A]The Axis Powers Patton_Monty.tif: Patton and his rival Gen. Bernard Montgomery greet each other on Sicily in July 1943. The two fought the Axis powers in Tunisia, Sicily, and the European theater.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutsche Generäle in Britischer Gefangenschaft 1942–1945. Eine
    289 Von vielen deutschen Generälen des Zweiten Weltkriegs sind häufig nur die Laufbahndaten bekannt; Briefe und Tagebücher liegen nur wenige vor. Für die For­ schung sind sie oft genug nur eingeschränkt zugänglich. So fällt es nach wie vor schwer, zu beurteilen, wie die Generale selbst die militärischen und politischen Geschehnisse der Zeit zwischen 1939 und 1945 rezipiert haben und welche Folgerungen sie daraus zogen. Wichtige Aufschlüsse über ihre Kenntnisse von den nationalsozialistischen Massenmorden oder ihr Urteil über den deutschen Widerstand gegen Hitler bieten jedoch die Abhörprotokolle deutscher Stabsoffiziere in britischer Kriegsgefangen­ schaft. Sönke Neitzel Deutsche Generäle in britischer Gefangenschaft 1942-1945 Eine Auswahledition der Abhörprotokolle des Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centre UK Die deutsche Generalität hat sich der öffentlichen Reflexion über ihre Rolle wäh­ rend des Zweiten Weltkrieges weitgehend verschlossen. Das Bild, das sie vor allem in ihren Memoiren von sich selbst zeichnete, läßt sich verkürzt auf die Formel bringen: Sie hat einen sauberen Krieg geführt, hatte von Kriegsverbrechen größe­ ren Ausmaßes keine oder kaum Kenntnis, und die militärische Niederlage war zu einem Gutteil den dilettantischen Eingriffen Hitlers als Obersten Befehlshaber in die Kriegführung zuzuschreiben. Es erübrigt sich näher darauf einzugehen, daß dieses Bild von der Geschichts­ wissenschaft längst gründlich widerlegt worden ist. Aber nach wie vor wissen wir wenig darüber, wie die Generäle die Zeit zwischen 1939 und 1945 rezipiert haben, welche Kenntnis sie von den militärischen und politischen Geschehnissen hatten, die über ihren engen Arbeitsbereich hinausgingen, und welche Schlußfolgerungen sie hieraus zogen. Zur Durchleuchtung dieses Komplexes ist vor allem der Rück­ griff auf persönliche Quellen wie Briefe und Tagebücher notwendig, die allerdings nur von einem kleinen Personenkreis vorliegen und zudem oft auch nur beschränkt zugänglich sind, da sie sich in Privatbesitz befinden1.
    [Show full text]
  • German Defence of Normandy Tour Prices: 4 Day Tour £649 Per Guest Low Single Rooms Supplements £40 Per Night Deposit Just £100 Per Person
    World War Two Tours German Defence of Normandy Tour Prices: 4 day tour £649 per guest Low Single Rooms Supplements £40 per night Deposit just £100 per person Next Trip Dates: June 12-15 2014 PLACES AVAILABLE What’s included: Bed & Breakfast Accommodation All transport from the official overseas start point The Germans’ first line of defence was the English Channel, a crossing that had confounded Accompanied for the trip duration foreign nations for centuries. Multiplying the invasion obstacles was the extensive Atlantic Wall, All Museum entrances which Adolf Hitler ordered to be constructed in his Directive 51. The “wall” stretched from Norway All Expert Talks & Guidance to Spain in varying degrees, but was most elaborate in the sectors facing the English Channel. Low Group Numbers Believing any invasion had to be defeated on the beaches and that any landings would be timed for high tide, Rommel had the entire wall fortified with pill boxes, artillery, machine gun positions and extensive barbed wire as well as laying hundreds of thousands of mines to deter landing “I just wanted to thank you for the craft. The Allies chose not to attack at Calais but at the more distant beaches of Normandy, which trip, it was a great experience & was also the sector boundary between the 7th and 15th German armies, on the extreme eastern both Nicky and I enjoyed it very flank of the former, to maximize the possible confusion of command responsibility during the much. Your depth of knowledge on German reaction. The landings sector that was attacked was occupied by four German divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO's WHO in the WAR in EUROPE the War in Europe 7 CHARLES DE GAULLE
    who’s Who in the War in Europe (National Archives and Records Administration, 342-FH-3A-20068.) POLITICAL LEADERS Allies FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT When World War II began, many Americans strongly opposed involvement in foreign conflicts. President Roosevelt maintained official USneutrality but supported measures like the Lend-Lease Act, which provided invaluable aid to countries battling Axis aggression. After Pearl Harbor and Germany’s declaration of war on the United States, Roosevelt rallied the country to fight the Axis powers as part of the Grand Alliance with Great Britain and the Soviet Union. (Image: Library of Congress, LC-USZ62-128765.) WINSTON CHURCHILL In the 1930s, Churchill fiercely opposed Westernappeasement of Nazi Germany. He became prime minister in May 1940 following a German blitzkrieg (lightning war) against Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, and France. He then played a pivotal role in building a global alliance to stop the German juggernaut. One of the greatest orators of the century, Churchill raised the spirits of his countrymen through the war’s darkest days as Germany threatened to invade Great Britain and unleashed a devastating nighttime bombing program on London and other major cities. (Image: Library of Congress, LC-USW33-019093-C.) JOSEPH STALIN Stalin rose through the ranks of the Communist Party to emerge as the absolute ruler of the Soviet Union. In the 1930s, he conducted a reign of terror against his political opponents, including much of the country’s top military leadership. His purge of Red Army generals suspected of being disloyal to him left his country desperately unprepared when Germany invaded in June 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 Points Total) PLEASE DO NO
    Mr. Huesken 10th Grade United States History II Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 points total) PLEASE DO NO WRITE ON THIS TEST DIRECTIONS – Please answer the following multiple-choice questions with the best possible answer. No answer will be used more than once. (45 questions @ 1 point each = 45 points) 1) All of the following were leaders of totalitarian governments in the 1930’s and 1940’s except: a. Joseph Stalin b. Francisco Franco. c. Benito Mussolini d. Neville Chamberlain. 2) In what country was the Fascist party and government formed? a. Italy b. Japan c. Spain d. Germany 3) The Battle of Britain forced Germany to do what to their war plans in Europe in 1942? a. Join the Axis powers. b. Fight a three-front war. c. Put off the invasion of Britain. d. Enter into a nonaggression pact with Britain. 4) The Nazis practiced genocide toward Jews, Gypsies, and other “undesirable” peoples in Europe. What does the term “genocide” mean? a. Acting out of anti-Semitic beliefs. b. Deliberate extermination of a specific group of people. c. Terrorizing of the citizens of a nation by a government. d. Killing of people for the express purpose of creating terror. 5) The term “blitzkrieg” was a military strategy that depended on what? a. A system of fortifications. b. Out-waiting the opponent. c. Surprise and quick, overwhelming force. d. The ability to make a long, steady advance. 6) In an effort to avoid a second “world war”, when did the Britain and France adopt a policy of appeasement toward Germany? a.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization and Training of SS-Panzer Regiment 12 (29 June
    1 Organization and Training of SS-Panzer Regiment 12 (29 June 1943–6 June 1944) nitial negotiations concerning an SS Division to be composed of young members of the Hitlerjugend commenced in February 1943 between the representatives of the Waffen-SS and the National Socialist youth organization. On their recommendation Ion 24 June 1943 Adolf Hitler issued an order for the division to be set up in the Beverloo training facility north of Brussels. The officers and NCOs of the new unit were reassigned from its patron division the 1.SS-Panzer-Grenadier-Division “Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler”1. The enlisted were mainly German young men born in the first half of 1926 who had already received paramilitary training. SS-Panzer Regiment 12 had been in formation since 29 June 1943 in the Mailly-le- Camp training facility northeast of Paris. Approximately 200 soldiers were transferred to the new regiment from the patron division’s SS-Panzer Regiment 1. At the end of 1943 the I./SS-Panzer Regiment 12 was still far from being operational. The chronology of the organization, training and equipment of the unit in 1944 is as follows:2 1 January 1944 SS-Panzer Regiment 12, which at the time was stationed at the Mailly-le-Camp training facility in France, received an order from the Oberbefehlshaber “West” (Senior Area Commander “West”) to relocate to the training facility near Beverloo in Belgium to join the other units of the division being trained there. 4 January 1944 Distribution of the tactical identification (turret) numbers. The tactical identification number system applied in SS-Panzer Regiment 12 was different from the principles followed by the Army and the armoured units within the Waffen-SS.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomsko Delo
    UNIVERZA V MARIBORU FILOZOFSKA FAKULTETA Oddelek za zgodovino DIPLOMSKO DELO Daniel Siter Maribor, 2015 UNIVERZA V MARIBORU FILOZOFSKA FAKULTETA Oddelek za zgodovino Diplomsko delo VOJAŠKI NAČRT ERICHA VON MANSTEINA IN PROBLEMATIKA DUNKERQUA ERICH VON MANSTEIN'S MILITARY OPERATION PLAN AND THE ISSUE OF DUNKIRK PORT Mentor: red. prof. dr. Darko Friš Kandidat: Daniel Siter Maribor, 2015 Lektorica: Tamara Kovačič, univ. dipl. anglistka in slovenistka Zahvala Zahvaljujem se mentorju red. prof. dr. Darku Frišu za strokovno pomoč in nasvete pri nastajanju diplomskega dela. Iskreno se zahvaljujem svoji punci Katji, ki mi je ves čas mojega študija stala ob strani, me podpirala, spodbujala in pomagala, kadar je bilo to potrebno. Hvala! Neizmerno hvaležnost pa bi želel izreči tudi svoji družini, ki mi je nudila moralno spodbudo in finančno podporo. Podpisani Daniel Siter, rojen 31. 10. 1992, študent Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Mariboru, smer zgodovina in geografija, izjavljam, da je diplomsko delo z naslovom Vojaški načrt Ericha von Mansteina in problematika Dunkerqua pri mentorju red. prof. dr. Darku Frišu avtorsko delo. V diplomskem delu so uporabljeni viri in literatura korektno navedeni; teksti niso prepisani brez navedbe avtorjev. Maribor, 2. 9. 2015 KAZALO POVZETEK / SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1 1 UVOD ................................................................................................................................. 3 2 ZAKLJUČEK OPERACIJ
    [Show full text]
  • Erwin Rommel Account of Blitzkrieg
    Blitzkrieg, 1940 Directions: Read and annotate the secondary source description of German Blitzkrieg and the primary source account by German General Rommel. Then, write a fake primary source from the perspective of a person living in France, either a soldier or a civilian, describing the experience from their perspective. The period between Germany's defeat of Poland in October 1939 and her invasion of Norway in April 1940 is often referred to as the "Phony War." Not much happened. The French stiffened their defenses while the British moved troops to the continent. The British wanted to send their air force to bomb targets inside Germany but were persuaded not to by the French who feared German reprisal. The major activity consisted of dueling propaganda messages blared from loud speakers across the German and French lines. The French, feeling secure behind their Maginot Line, were ready to fight World War I all over again - a war of defense. Hitler had other ideas. In order to isolate the iron ore resources of Sweden, and secure his northern flank, Hitler invaded Norway and Denmark on April 9. The next blow came a month later. In the early morning darkness of May 10, the Germans unleashed their Blitzkrieg against the Netherlands and Belgium. The attack sent the defending troops reeling. The roads overflowed with refugees fleeing the front. French and British troops rushing to the rescue were caught in the headlong retreat and pushed back. German dive-bombers - the Stukas - filled the sky, strafing the retreating mix of civilians and soldiers with machine gun and bomb.
    [Show full text]