1 REVISED VERSION #4194R1 1 2 Lucabindiite, (K,NH4)As4o6(Cl,Br
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Single-Crystal Epr Study of Radiation-Induced Defects
A SINGLE-CRYSTAL EPR STUDY OF RADIATION-INDUCED DEFECTS IN SELECTED SILICATES A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Geological Sciences University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Mao Mao Copyright Mao Mao, October, 2012. All rights reserved. Permission to Use In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Doctor of Philosophy degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Geological Sciences 114 Science Place University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N5E2, Canada i Abstract This thesis presents a series of single-crystal electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies on radiation-induced defects in selected silicate minerals, including apophyllites, prehnite, and hemimorphite, not only providing new insights to mechanisms of radiation-induced damage in minerals but also having direct relevance to remediation of heavy metalloid contamination and nuclear waste disposal. -
Previously Unknown Quasicrystal Periodic Approximant Found in Space Received: 13 August 2018 Luca Bindi 1, Joyce Pham 2 & Paul J
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Previously unknown quasicrystal periodic approximant found in space Received: 13 August 2018 Luca Bindi 1, Joyce Pham 2 & Paul J. Steinhardt3,4 Accepted: 16 October 2018 We report the discovery of Al Ni Fe , the frst natural known periodic crystalline approximant Published: xx xx xxxx 34 9 2 to decagonite (Al71Ni24Fe5), a natural quasicrystal composed of a periodic stack of planes with quasiperiodic atomic order and ten-fold symmetry. The new mineral has been approved by the International Mineralogical Association (IMA 2018-038) and ofcially named proxidecagonite, which derives from its identity to periodic approximant of decagonite. Both decagonite and proxidecagonite were found in fragments from the Khatyrka meteorite. Proxidecagonite is the frst natural quasicrystal approximant to be found in the Al-Ni-Fe system. Within this system, the decagonal quasicrystal phase has been reported to transform at ~940 °C to Al13(Fe,Ni)4, Al3(Fe,Ni)2 and the liquid phase, and between 800 and 850 °C to Al13(Fe,Ni)4, Al3(Fe,Ni) and Al3(Fe,Ni)2. The fact that proxidecagonite has not been observed in the laboratory before and formed in a meteorite exposed to high pressures and temperatures during impact-induced shocks suggests that it might be a thermodynamically stable compound at high pressure. The most prominent structural motifs are pseudo-pentagonal symmetry subunits, such as pentagonal bipyramids, that share edges and corners with trigonal bipyramids and which maximize shortest Ni–Al over Ni–Ni contacts. 1,2 Te frst decagonal quasicrystalline (QC) phase found in nature, decagonite Al71Ni24Fe5 , was discovered in the Khatyrka meteorite, a CV3 carbonaceous chondrite3–8. -
The Rarer Metals
THE RARER METALS. By FRANK L. HESS. INTRODUCTION. Great gold placer fields, now mere wastes of overturned gravels; worked-out coal fields; exhausted gold, silver, and other mines, with their sterile dumps, gaunt head frames, and decaying shaft houses and mills, testify that, unlike manufactures and agricultural prod ucts, mineral deposits are diminishing assets, and the fact that a large production of some mineral has been made in one year does not necessarily imply that it can be repeated under the impetus of great need. In estimating the possible production of any mineral for any period, a proper weighing of the attending circumstances, the statistics of production of preceding years, and a knowledge of the deposits themselves are all necessary, and these statements probably apply more forcibly to the metals used in alloy steels than to others, for these metals occur in vastly less quantities than coal, iron, copper, or the other common metals, and the individual deposits are smaller' and much less widely distributed and, unlike those of copper or iron, are in very few places concentrated from lean into richer deposits. Comparatively restricted markets and lack of knowledge concern ing these metals themselves and of the minerals in which they occur have prevented prospecting for them until within the last few years, so that as a rule developments of such deposits are small. The subjects briefly discussed here with reference to their avail ability as war supplies are treated more fully in Mineral Resources and other publications of the.United States Geological Survey, espe cially those for recent years. -
Minerals of Arizona Report
MINERALS OF ARIZONA by Frederic W. Galbraith and Daniel J. Brennan THE ARIZONA BUREAU OF MINES Price One Dollar Free to Residents of Arizona Bulletin 181 1970 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA TUCSON TABLE OF CONT'ENTS EIements .___ 1 FOREWORD Sulfides ._______________________ 9 As a service about mineral matters in Arizona, the Arizona Bureau Sulfosalts ._. .___ __ 22 of Mines, University of Arizona, is pleased to reprint the long-standing booklet on MINERALS OF ARIZONA. This basic journal was issued originally in 1941, under the authorship of Dr. Frederic W. Galbraith, as Simple Oxides .. 26 a bulletin of the Arizona Bureau of Mines. It has moved through several editions and, in some later printings, it was authored jointly by Dr. Gal Oxides Containing Uranium, Thorium, Zirconium .. .... 34 braith and Dr. Daniel J. Brennan. It now is being released in its Fourth Edition as Bulletin 181, Arizona Bureau of Mines. Hydroxides .. .. 35 The comprehensive coverage of mineral information contained in the bulletin should serve to give notable and continuing benefits to laymen as well as to professional scientists of Arizona. Multiple Oxides 37 J. D. Forrester, Director Arizona Bureau of Mines Multiple Oxides Containing Columbium, February 2, 1970 Tantaum, Titanium .. .. .. 40 Halides .. .. __ ____ _________ __ __ 41 Carbonates, Nitrates, Borates .. .... .. 45 Sulfates, Chromates, Tellurites .. .. .. __ .._.. __ 57 Phosphates, Arsenates, Vanadates, Antimonates .._ 68 First Edition (Bulletin 149) July 1, 1941 Vanadium Oxysalts ...... .......... 76 Second Edition, Revised (Bulletin 153) April, 1947 Third Edition, Revised 1959; Second Printing 1966 Fourth Edition (Bulletin 181) February, 1970 Tungstates, Molybdates.. _. .. .. .. 79 Silicates ... -
Associations of Ore Minerals in the Deposits of the Seinäjoki District and the Discussion on the Ore Formation
ASSOCIATIONS OF ORE MINERALS IN THE DEPOSITS OF THE SEINÄJOKI DISTRICT AND THE DISCUSSION ON THE ORE FORMATION YU. S. BORODAEV; N. S. BORTNIKOV; N. N. MOZGOVA; N. A. OZEROVA; P. OIVANEN and V. YLETYINEN BORODAEV, YU. S.; BORTNIKOV, N. S.; MOZGOVA, N. N.; OZE- ROVA N. A.; P. OIVANEN and V. YLETYINEN, 1983: Associations of ore minerals in the deposits of the Seinäjoki district and the dis- cussion on the ore formation. Bull. Geol. Soc. Finland 55, 1, 3-23. The mineral associations of the antimony deposits in the Seinä- joki region (Finland) are described on the basis of microprobe inves- tigations. There are two ore associations: quartz-antimony and pyr- rhotite-antimony. The latter is characterized by the presence of the new minerals seinäjokite and pääkkönenite first discovered in these deposits. The data obtained suggest that minerals were formed in the deposits under specific conditions: at relatively high temperatures for antimony deposition, and at extremely low sulphur fugacity for the hydrothermal process. Key words: Antimony, seinäjokite, pääkkönenite, sulphur fugacity Seinäjoki. Yu. S. Borodaev, N. S. Bortnikov, N. N. Mozgova and N. A. Ozerova: IGEM, Staromonetnyi 35, Moscow 109017, USSR. P. Oivanen and V. Yletyinen: Geological Survey of Finland, SF-02150 Espoo 15, Finland. Introduction ny ores in detail and to advance some sug- gestions on their genesis (Pääkkönen 1966). The Seinäjoki ore district, situated in west- During the last few years exploration has ern central Finland, is unique for its deposits concentrated primarily on two deposits, Kal- of native antimony. The content of native lio salo and Tervasmäki. -
Chance and Necessity in the Mineral Diversity of Terrestrial Planets
295 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 53, pp. 295-324 (2015) DOI: 10.3749/canmin.1400086 MINERAL ECOLOGY: CHANCE AND NECESSITY IN THE MINERAL DIVERSITY OF TERRESTRIAL PLANETS § ROBERT M. HAZEN Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, DC 20015, U.S.A. EDWARD S. GREW School of Earth and Climate Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, U.S.A. ROBERT T. DOWNS AND JOSHUA GOLDEN Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077, U.S.A. GRETHE HYSTAD Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, 617 N. Santa Rita Ave., Tucson, Arizona 85721-0089, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Four factors contribute to the roles played by chance and necessity in determining mineral distribution and diversity at or near the surfaces of terrestrial planets: (1) crystal chemical characteristics; (2) mineral stability ranges; (3) the probability of occurrence for rare minerals; and (4) stellar and planetary stoichiometries in extrasolar systems. The most abundant elements generally have the largest numbers of mineral species, as modeled by relationships for Earth’s upper continental crust (E) and the Moon (M), respectively: 2 LogðNEÞ¼0:22 LogðCEÞþ1:70 ðR ¼ 0:34Þð4861 minerals; 72 elementsÞ 2 LogðNMÞ¼0:19 LogðCMÞþ0:23 ðR ¼ 0:68Þð63 minerals; 24 elementsÞ; where C is an element’s abundance in ppm and N is the number of mineral species in which that element is essential. Several elements that plot significantly below the trend for Earth’s upper continental crust (e.g., Ga, Hf, and Rb) mimic other more abundant elements and thus are less likely to form their own species. -
Evidence for the Extraterrestrial Origin of a Natural Quasicrystal
Evidence for the extraterrestrial origin of a natural quasicrystal Luca Bindia,b, John M. Eilerc, Yunbin Guanc, Lincoln S. Hollisterd, Glenn MacPhersone, Paul J. Steinhardtf,g,1, and Nan Yaoh aMuseo di Storia Naturale, Sezione di Mineralogia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via La Pira 4, I-50121 Florence, Italy; bDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Firenze, Via La Pira 4, I-50121 Florence, Italy; cDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; dDepartment of Geosciences, Princeton University, Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544; eDepartment of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013; fPrinceton Center for Theoretical Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; gDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Jadwin Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544; and hPrinceton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 Edited by* Paul M. Chaikin, New York University, New York, NY, and approved November 21, 2011 (received for review July 9, 2011) We present evidence that a rock sample found in the Koryak The rock sample was first identified for study as a result of Mountains in Russia and containing icosahedrite, an icosahedral a decade-long systematic search for a natural quasicrystal (4). quasicrystalline phase with composition Al63Cu24Fe13, is part of a Quasicrystals are solids whose atomic arrangement exhibits qua- meteorite, likely formed in the early solar system about 4.5 Gya. siperiodic rather than periodic translational order and rotational The quasicrystal grains are intergrown with diopside, forsterite, symmetries that are impossible for ordinary crystals (5) such as stishovite, and additional metallic phases [khatyrkite (CuAl2), cupa- fivefold symmetry in two-dimensions and icosahedral symmetry lite (CuAl), and β-phase (AlCuFe)]. -
Penalty Element Separation from Copper Concetrates Utilizing Froth Flotation
PENALTY ELEMENT SEPARATION FROM COPPER CONCETRATES UTILIZING FROTH FLOTATION by Zachery Zanetell A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Metallurgical and Materials Engineering). Golden, CO Date: Signed: Zachery A. Zanetell Signed: Dr. Patrick R. Taylor Thesis Advisor Golden, CO Date: Signed: Dr. Michael Kaufman Professor and Head Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering ii ABSTRACT The copper ores that are currently being considered for development and processing are lower in grade and contain higher amounts of deleterious elements, which create difficulty in achieving a final copper concentrate that meets current restrictions. This presents increasing challenges to the process metallurgists during project development as well as to presently operating mines and mills. This thesis will focus on the separation of the deleterious elements, also known as penalty elements, mainly bismuth and arsenic from a copper concentrate using froth flotation techniques. The ability to separate penalty elements from copper concentrates will directly benefit mining companies by creating a final copper concentrate that will result in fewer financial penalties from smelter refineries. iii Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. -
Arsenic As C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
Arsenic As c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 32/m. Commonly granular, massive, and in concentric layers; may be reticulated, reniform, stalactitic; rarely columnar or acicular; also as rhombohedra, to 1 mm. Twinning: Rare on twin plane {1014}; pressure twinning on {0112} develops delicate lamellae. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Perfect on {0001}, fair on {1014}. Fracture: Uneven. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 3.5 VHN = 72–173 (100 g load). D(meas.) = 5.63–5.78 D(calc.) = 5.778 Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Tin-white, tarnishes to dark gray. Streak: Tin-white. Luster: Nearly metallic. Pleochroism: Feeble. Anisotropism: Distinct, yellowish brown and light gray to yellowish gray. R1–R2: (400) 56.0–57.5, (420) 55.1–56.8, (440) 54.2–56.2, (460) 53.3–55.8, (480) 52.7–55.7, (500) 52.4–55.7, (520) 52.0–55.7, (540) 51.7–55.7, (560) 51.5–55.6, (580) 51.2–55.4, (600) 51.0–55.2, (620) 50.8–55.0, (640) 50.6–54.9, (660) 50.5–54.8, (680) 50.4–54.7, (700) 50.4–54.6 Cell Data: Space Group: R3m (synthetic). a = 3.7598(1) c = 10.5475(2) Z = 6 X-ray Powder Pattern: Synthetic. 2.771 (100), 3.52 (30), 1.879 (30), 2.05 (20), 1.556 (10), 1.768 (10), 1.757 (7) Chemistry: (1) (2) As 98.14 99.1 Sb 1.65 0.2 S 0.16 insol. 0.15 Total 100.10 99.3 (1) Mount Royal, near Montreal, Quebec, Canada. -
Removal of Arsenic(Iii) from Water with a New Solid- Supported Thiol
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Chemistry Chemistry 2012 REMOVAL OF ARSENIC(III) FROM WATER WITH A NEW SOLID- SUPPORTED THIOL Partha Jana University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Jana, Partha, "REMOVAL OF ARSENIC(III) FROM WATER WITH A NEW SOLID-SUPPORTED THIOL" (2012). Theses and Dissertations--Chemistry. 11. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/chemistry_etds/11 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Chemistry at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Chemistry by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained and attached hereto needed written permission statements(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine). I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless a preapproved embargo applies. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of my work. -
In Search of Natural Quasicrystals
Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience In search of natural quasicrystals This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article. 2012 Rep. Prog. Phys. 75 092601 (http://iopscience.iop.org/0034-4885/75/9/092601) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 150.217.74.78 The article was downloaded on 10/08/2012 at 10:09 Please note that terms and conditions apply. IOP PUBLISHING REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS Rep. Prog. Phys. 75 (2012) 092601 (11pp) doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/9/092601 In search of natural quasicrystals Paul J Steinhardt1,4 and Luca Bindi2,3 1 Department of Physics and Princeton Center for Theoretical Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA 2 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita` di Firenze, via La Pira 4, I-50121 Firenze, Italy 3 C.N.R., Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Sezione di Firenze, Via La Pira 4, I-50121 Firenze, Italy Received 14 May 2012, in final form 9 July 2012 Published 10 August 2012 Online at stacks.iop.org/RoPP/75/092601 Abstract The concept of quasicrystals was first introduced twenty-eight years ago and, since then, over a hundred types have been discovered in the laboratory under precisely controlled physical conditions designed to avoid crystallization. Yet the original theory suggested that quasicrystals can potentially be as robust and stable as crystals, perhaps even forming naturally. These considerations motivated a decade-long search for a natural quasicrystal culminating in the discovery of icosahedrite (Al63Cu24Fe13), an icosahedral quasicrystal found in a rock sample composed mainly of khatyrkite (crystalline (Cu,Zn)Al2) labeled as coming from the Koryak Mountains of far eastern Russia. -
Meteorite Mineralogy Alan Rubin , Chi Ma Index More Information
Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48452-7 — Meteorite Mineralogy Alan Rubin , Chi Ma Index More Information Index 2I/Borisov, 104, See interstellar interloper alabandite, 70, 96, 115, 142–143, 151, 170, 174, 177, 181, 187, 189, 306 Abbott. See meteorite Alais. See meteorite Abee. See meteorite Albareto. See meteorite Acapulco. See meteorite Albin. See meteorite acapulcoites, 107, 173, 179, 291, 303, Al-Biruni, 3 309, 314 albite, 68, 70, 72, 76, 78, 87, 92, 98, 136–137, 139, accretion, 238, 260, 292, 347, 365 144, 152, 155, 157–158, 162, 171, 175, 177–178, acetylene, 230 189–190, 200, 205–206, 226, 243, 255–257, 261, Acfer 059. See meteorite 272, 279, 295, 306, 309, 347 Acfer 094. See meteorite albite twinning, 68 Acfer 097. See meteorite Aldrin, Buzz, 330 achondrites, 101, 106–108, 150, 171, 175, 178–179, Aletai. See meteorite 182, 226, 253, 283, 291, 294, 303, 309–310, 318, ALH 77307. See meteorite 350, 368, 374 ALH 78091. See meteorite acute bisectrix, 90 ALH 78113. See meteorite adamite, 83 ALH 81005. See meteorite addibischoffite, 116, 167 ALH 82130. See meteorite Adelaide. See meteorite ALH 83009. See meteorite Adhi Kot. See meteorite ALH 83014. See meteorite Admire. See meteorite ALH 83015. See meteorite adrianite, 117, 134, 167, 268 ALH 83108. See meteorite aerogel, 234 ALH 84001. See meteorite Aeschylus, 6 ALH 84028. See meteorite agate, 2 ALH 85085. See meteorite AGB stars. See asymptotic giant branch stars ALH 85151. See meteorite agglutinate, 201, 212, 224, 279, 301–302, 308 ALHA76004. See meteorite Agpalilik. See Cape York ALHA77005.