Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Traffic Control and Communication Devices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(Keeping Safe Distances from Bicycles) Bill 2014 Second Reading Speech Hon Lynn Maclaren MLC - 20 March 2014
Road Traffic Amendment (Keeping Safe Distances from Bicycles) Bill 2014 Second Reading Speech Hon Lynn MacLaren MLC - 20 March 2014 I move that the Bill be now read a second time. Cyclists need a protective buffer when sharing roads with motorists. Current Western Australian road rules require drivers of motor vehicles to allow ‘sufficient’ overtaking distance when passing a bicycle rider. ‘Sufficient’ is an inadequate and unclear description that has repeatedly failed to protect bicycle riders. Amendments to road rules to specify a minimum distance are critical to improving the safety of bicycle riders. As specified in the Road Traffic Code 2000, a safe passing distance between a cyclist and a motor vehicle is considered to be “a sufficient distance to avoid a collision with that vehicle or to avoid obstructing the path of that vehicle.” 1 In addition, a safe distance behind a vehicle is considered to be a distance at which it “will enable the driver to stop the vehicle in an emergency with safety, and without running into the vehicle in front of him or her.”2 Legislative amendment, with appropriate education and enforcement, to mandate a minimum distance that motorists must keep from bicycle riders is currently the single most important action needed to reduce bicycle rider fatalities. There is an ethical issue when comparing dangerous behaviour by motorists to risky behaviour by cyclists. The driver endangers the cyclist, not vice versa, and it is rare for a cyclist or pedestrian to injure another road user. As reported on the ABC’s 7.30 programme last Friday night, there's no doubt who comes off second best when a car and a bike collide. -
AUSTRALIAN ROAD RULES AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 1999 (No
AUSTRALIAN ROAD RULES AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 1999 (No. 2) Regulatory Impact Statement September 1999 Report to: National Road Transport Commission Prepared by: R Ungars Report to: National Road Transport Commission Australian Road Rules Amendment Regulations 1999 (No. 2) Regulatory Impact Statement Prepared by: R Ungars ISBN: 0 642 54440 9 REPORT OUTLINE Date: September 1999 ISBN Number: 0 642 54440 9 Title and Sub-title: Australian Road Rules Amendment Regulations 1999 (No.2) Performing Organisation and Address Details Mr R Ungars 9 Yarilla Road SASSAFRAS VIC 3787 NRTC Contact: Ian Shepherd, Senior Project Manager, Phone (03) 9321 8444 Type of Report: Regulatory Impact Statement Objectives: To ensure that the Australian Road Rules clearly reflect the principles and policy agreed to during the extensive consultation process leading to their acceptance by the Australian Transport Council in January 1999, and enable implementation of the Rules by all States and Territories from 1 December 1999. NRTC Programs: Implementation of Reforms. Key Milestones: Approval of the Australian Road Rules by the Australian Transport Council in January 1999. Consideration of amendments to the Rules by representatives of all jurisdictions, meeting as the Australian Road Rules Maintenance Group during March to September 1999 and Parliamentary Counsel of each State and Territory. Abstract: Amendments are required to clarify the intent of particular provisions in the Australian Road Rules; to incorporate corrections and rectify omissions largely of a minor nature; to enable the finalisation and subsequent publication of the amended Australian Road Rules, so that States and Territories can proceed without delay to their implementation on 1 December 1999; and to ensure that the Australian Road Rules, when implemented, make the maximum contribution to road safety and the efficient movement of traffic on Australia’s roads. -
KANSAS MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT REPORT CODING MANUAL May 2014 Version 1.0
KANSAS MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT REPORT CODING MANUAL May 2014 Version 1.0 RESOURCES: • Email [email protected] • Twitter Follow us on https://twitter.com/#!/KDOTCrashInfo • Facebook Friend Kdot CrashInfo at www.facebook.com • Phone 785.296.0456, 785.296.7789, 785.296.5169 • Addresses See page 3 • Stats/Ordering http://www.ksdot.org/lawinfo/ • Maps http://ksdot.maps.arcgis.com (Groups Law Enforcement) Significant Coding Manual Changes Since Version 2012, 1.0 Adjustments ♦ Modified KDOT Address and web link – Page 3 ♦ New road name options for unnamed trafficways – Page 7 & 15 o Example 23 ♦ Correction concerning parked emergency vehicles – Page 9 ♦ Clarification on “working vehicle” coding – Page 10 ♦ Added web links for Mile Marker and Access Control maps – Pages 14 & 17 ♦ Replaced example for Accident Location 12, 13, and 14 – Page 23 ♦ Enhancement to Latitude/Longitude wording – Page 19 ♦ Correction to Special Event coding instructions – Page 36 ♦ Clarification on co-owners of vehicles – Page 55 ♦ Clarification on Expiration Year – Page 55 ♦ Reminder concerning Vehicle Damage – Page 59 ♦ Clarification on Vehicle Sequence of Events coding – Page 60 ♦ Changed the examples to reflect the back of the 852 form – Page 62 ♦ Removed an incorrect legally parked vehicle exclusion – Page 40 ♦ Correction to Unusual Coding Situation: Cargo/debris – Page 93 ♦ Added Work Zone Category to the definitions section – Page 81 ♦ Report Examples: reviewed all for clarity, coding, correction – Page 96 ♦ Example 5: Added an illegally parked vehicle ♦ Example 23: New Parking Lot coding scenarios ♦ Quick Reference Check List – Outside Back Cover Note: There are a few other minor wording adjustments not listed above. -
Traffic and Road Sign Recognition
Traffic and Road Sign Recognition Hasan Fleyeh This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of Napier University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2008 Abstract This thesis presents a system to recognise and classify road and traffic signs for the purpose of developing an inventory of them which could assist the highway engineers’ tasks of updating and maintaining them. It uses images taken by a camera from a moving vehicle. The system is based on three major stages: colour segmentation, recognition, and classification. Four colour segmentation algorithms are developed and tested. They are a shadow and highlight invariant, a dynamic threshold, a modification of de la Escalera’s algorithm and a Fuzzy colour segmentation algorithm. All algorithms are tested using hundreds of images and the shadow-highlight invariant algorithm is eventually chosen as the best performer. This is because it is immune to shadows and highlights. It is also robust as it was tested in different lighting conditions, weather conditions, and times of the day. Approximately 97% successful segmentation rate was achieved using this algorithm. Recognition of traffic signs is carried out using a fuzzy shape recogniser. Based on four shape measures - the rectangularity, triangularity, ellipticity, and octagonality, fuzzy rules were developed to determine the shape of the sign. Among these shape measures octangonality has been introduced in this research. The final decision of the recogniser is based on the combination of both the colour and shape of the sign. The recogniser was tested in a variety of testing conditions giving an overall performance of approximately 88%. -
Human Factors As Causes for Road Traffic Accidents in the Sultanate of Oman Under Consideration of Road Construction Designs
Human Factors as Causes for Road Traffic Accidents in the Sultanate of Oman under Consideration of Road Construction Designs Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. phil.) der philosophischen Fakultät II (Psychologie, Pädagogik und Sportwissenschaft) der Universität Regensburg Vorgelegt von Kai Plankermann Burglengenfeld 2013 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. phil. Dr. h.c. Alf Zimmer Engineering Psychology Unit, University of Regensburg Zweiter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Mark W. Greenlee Institute of experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg 1 Acknowledgement I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Professor Alf Zimmer for accepting me as his PhD student and for providing me with his continuous support. I would also like to thank Dr. Abdullah Al-Maniri who supported me throughout the data collection in Oman. Also, I owe my gratitude to Aisha Al-Belushia who conducted the interviews at Ibra Hospital. Finally, I would like to thank the following persons for contributing to this thesis in one way or another and apologize to those I forgot to mention. The Engineers Altayeb Al-Harthi, Muhammad Al-Hosny (both Muscat Municipality) and Saleh Al- Shukaili (Directorate General for Road and Land Transportation) for providing the road data; the Drs. Muhamad Zaheerudeen (Khoula Hospital), Salem Al-Abri (Nizwa Hospital) and Ali Al-Dawi (Ibra Hospital) for facilitating the data collection at the hospitals; the Engineers Jochen Zimmermann (IJK Associates), Jens Aalund, Klaus Andersen (both COWI) and Jürgen Piel (STRABAG) for fruitful discussions about road safety in Oman; Muhamad Al-Aamri, Mahmud Al-Khatri, Yousuf Al-Rawahi and Mazin Al-Wahibi for helping me during the data collection; Chantal Blake and Amanda Amarotico for proofreading first drafts of this thesis; Dr. -
Australian Standard
AS 1742.8—1990 Australian Standard Manual of uniform traffic control devices Part 8: Freeways This is a free 6 page sample. Access the full version online. This Australian Standard was prepared by Committee MS/12, Road Signs and Traffic Signals. It was approved on behalf of the Council of StandardsAustralia on 27 June 1990 and published on 8 October 1990. The following interests are represented on Committee MS/12: ACT Administration Australian Automobile Association Australian Local Government Association Australian Road Research Board Austroads Confederation of Australian Industry Department of Transport and Communications Department of Road Transport, South Australia Local Government Engineers Association of Victoria Main Roads Department, Queensland Railways of Australia Committee Roads & Traffic Authority, New South Wales Transport Commission, Tasmania Vic Roads Review of Australian Standards. To keep abreast of progress in industry, Australian Standards are subject to periodic review and are kept up to date by the issue of amendments or new editions as necessary. It is important therefore that Standards users ensure that they are in possession of the latest edition, and any amendments thereto. Full details of all Australian Standards and related publications will be found in the Standards This is a free 6 page sample. Access the full version online. Australia Catalogue of Publications; this information is supplemented each month by the magazine ‘The Australian Standard’, which subscribing members receive, and which gives details of new publications, new editions and amendments, and of withdrawn Standards. Suggestions for improvements to Australian Standards, addressed to the head office of Standards Australia, are welcomed. Notification of any inaccuracy or ambiguity found in an Australian Standard should be made without delay in order that the matter may be investigated and appropriate action taken. -
Traffic Signal Design Section 10 - Signs
Traffic signal design Section 10 - Signs The traffic signal design guidelines have been developed to assist in designing traffic control signals. The guidelines are to comprise 16 sections and 5 appendices. These are initially being released individually and in no specific order. The sections which are to be released are as follows: Part Title Section 1 Investigation Section 2 Warrants Section 3 Design Process Section 4 Plan Requirements Section 5 Geometry Section 6 Pavement Marking Section 7 Phasing and Signal Group Display Sequence Section 8 Lanterns Section 9 Posts Section 10 Signs Section 11 Detectors Section 12 Controller Section 13 Provision for Future Facilities Section 14 Signalised Mid-block Marked Footcrossings Section 15 Special Situations Section 16 References Appendix A Design Plan Checklist Appendix B Traffic Signal Symbols Appendix C Location and Function of Lanterns Appendix D Location and Dimensions of Components Appendix E Left Turn on Red Appendix F Level Crossing Interface – Concept of Operations Appendix G Level Crossing Interface – Traffic Signal Design Guidance To determine which sections are currently available go to: www.rta.nsw.gov.au/doingbusinesswithus/downloads/technicalmanuals/trafficsignaldesign_dl1.html The information contained in the various parts is intended to be used as a guide to good practice. Discretion and judgement should be exercised in the light of the many factors that may influence the design of traffic signals at any particular site. The guidelines make reference, where relevant, to current Australian Standards and are intended to supplement and otherwise assist in their interpretation and application. Traffic Signal Design Section 10 SIGNS Special Note: As of 17 January 2011, the RTA is adopting the Austroads Guides (Guide to Traffic Management) and Australian Standards (AS 1742, 1743 & 2890) as its primary technical references. -
AS 1742.7-2007 Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices
AS 1742.7—2007 (Incorporating Amendment No. 1) AS 1742.7—2007 Australian Standard® Manual of uniform traffic control devices Part 7: Railway crossings This is a free 8 page sample. Access the full version online. This Australian Standard® was prepared by Committee MS-012, Road Signs and Traffic Signals. It was approved on behalf of the Council of Standards Australia on 19 January 2007. This Standard was published on 20 February 2007. The following are represented on Committee MS-012: • AUSTROADS • Association of Consultants in Access Australia • Australasian Railway Association • Australian Automobile Association • Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry • Department of Infrastructure (Victoria) • Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources (Tasmania) • Independent Transport Safety & Reliability Regulator (NSW) • Main Roads Department, Queensland • Main Roads Western Australia • Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW • Transport SA This Standard was issued in draft form for comment as DR 05314. Standards Australia wishes to acknowledge the participation of the expert individuals that contributed to the development of this Standard through their representation on the Committee and through the public comment period. Keeping Standards up-to-date Australian Standards® are living documents that reflect progress in science, technology and systems. To maintain their currency, all Standards are periodically reviewed, and new editions are published. Between editions, amendments may be issued. Standards may also be withdrawn. It is important that readers assure themselves they are using a current Standard, which should include any amendments that may have been published since the Standard was published. Detailed information about Australian Standards, drafts, amendments and new projects can be found by visiting www.standards.org.au Standards Australia welcomes suggestions for improvements, and encourages readers to notify us immediately of any apparent inaccuracies or ambiguities. -
A STUDY of WRITING Oi.Uchicago.Edu Oi.Uchicago.Edu /MAAM^MA
oi.uchicago.edu A STUDY OF WRITING oi.uchicago.edu oi.uchicago.edu /MAAM^MA. A STUDY OF "*?• ,fii WRITING REVISED EDITION I. J. GELB Phoenix Books THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS oi.uchicago.edu This book is also available in a clothbound edition from THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS TO THE MOKSTADS THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, CHICAGO & LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1952 in the International Copyright Union. All rights reserved. Published 1952. Second Edition 1963. First Phoenix Impression 1963. Printed in the United States of America oi.uchicago.edu PREFACE HE book contains twelve chapters, but it can be broken up structurally into five parts. First, the place of writing among the various systems of human inter communication is discussed. This is followed by four Tchapters devoted to the descriptive and comparative treatment of the various types of writing in the world. The sixth chapter deals with the evolution of writing from the earliest stages of picture writing to a full alphabet. The next four chapters deal with general problems, such as the future of writing and the relationship of writing to speech, art, and religion. Of the two final chapters, one contains the first attempt to establish a full terminology of writing, the other an extensive bibliography. The aim of this study is to lay a foundation for a new science of writing which might be called grammatology. While the general histories of writing treat individual writings mainly from a descriptive-historical point of view, the new science attempts to establish general principles governing the use and evolution of writing on a comparative-typological basis. -
Information Sheet – Road Train Speed Limits – Including B-Triples
10 June 2020 // FSCP0024 Information Sheet – Road Train Speed Limits – Including B-triples Purpose However, the maximum speed a road train may This information sheet outlines the speed limits travel at is determined by the State or Territory imposed on road trains (including B-triples) in all Road Authority. jurisdictions in Australia. Table 1 provides maximum speed limits in each jurisdiction. What is a road train? A road train means – Signposted speed limits Road trains must not exceed a posted speed limit a) a B-triple; or applying on a given road. b) a combination, other than a B-double, Road trains must obey the lesser of the signposted consisting of a motor vehicle towing at speed limit and the maximum speed permitted for least 2 trailers, excluding any converter road trains in each state or territory road authority dolly supporting a semitrailer. (see overleaf). Operation under a notice New South Wales and Victoria apply speed Figure 1 Portal image of a B-triple road train restrictions for road trains in the National Class 2 Background Road Train Operator’s Guide. The maximum permitted road speed in both States is 90km/h. Regulation for roads rules (such as speed limits), licensing and registration are a state and territory All other State and territory authorities apply government responsibility. The Heavy Vehicle maximum road train speed limits under road rules National Law (HVNL) does not provide the National or state and territory legislation. Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR) the power to Operators of road trains operating under a Notice exempt an operator from complying with the road must comply with the conditions of operation listed rules. -
Road Rules 2014 Under the Road Transport Act 2013
New South Wales Road Rules 2014 under the Road Transport Act 2013 His Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the following Rules under the Road Transport Act 2013. DUNCAN GAY, MLC Minister for Roads and Freight Explanatory note The objects of these Rules are: (a) to repeal the Road Rules 2008, and (b) to remake, with minor changes, the provisions of the repealed Rules. These Rules provide for: (a) road rules that are based on the Australian Road Rules approved by the Australian Transport Council and maintained by the National Transport Commission of the Commonwealth so as to ensure that the road rules applicable in this State are substantially uniform with road rules applicable elsewhere in Australia, and (b) other road rules to be observed by road users and other persons in this State in relation to matters that are not otherwise dealt with in the Australian Road Rules. These Rules also include new provisions dealing with the use of parking meters that require the entry of registration numbers. These Rules are made under the Road Transport Act 2013, including sections 23 (the general statutory rule-making power), 24, 25 and 26 and Schedule 1. These Rules comprise or relate to: (a) matters arising under legislation that is substantially uniform or complementary with legislation of the Commonwealth or another State or Territory, and (b) matters involving the substantial implementation of Agreed Reforms, within the meaning of the Inter-Governmental Agreement for Regulatory and Operational Reform in Road, Rail and Intermodal Transport entered into by the Commonwealth and each of the States and Territories (which came into effect on 15 January 2004), being Reforms that have been progressed in accordance with clause 11 of that Agreement. -
Assessment of Advanced Technologies for Reweving.' Urban Traffic Congestion
NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PRO.GRAM REPORT ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR REWEVING.' URBAN TRAFFIC CONGESTION TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1991 OFFICERS Chairman: C. Michael Walton, Bess Harris Jones Centennial Professor and Chairman, College ofEngineering, The University of Texas at Austin Vice Chairman: William W. Millar, Executive Director, Port Authority ofAllegheny County Executive Director: Thomas B. Deen, Transportation Research Board MEMBERS JAMES B. BUSEY IV, Federal Aviation Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) GILBERT E. CARMICHAEL, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) BRIAN W. CLYMER, Urban Mass-Transportation Administrator, US Department of Transportation (ex officio) JERRY R. CURRY, National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator, US. Department of Transportation (ex officio) -TRAVIS P. DUNGAN, Research & Special Programs Administrator, US. Department of Transportation (ex officio) FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS, Executive Director, American Association qJ*Stale Highway and Transportation Qfjrcials (ex officio) JOHN GRAY, President, National Asphalt Pavement Association (ex officio) THOMAS H. HANNA, President and ChiefExecutive Officer, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc (ex officio) HENRY J. HATCH, ChiefofEngineers and Commander, US. Army Corps ofEngineers (ex officio) THOMAS D. LARSON, Federal Highway Administrator,' US. Department of Transportation (ex officio) GEORGE H. WAY, JR., Vice Presidentfor Research and Test Departments, Association ofAmerican Railroads(ex officio) ROBERT J. AARONSON, President, Air Transport. Association ofAmerica JAMES M. BEGGS, Chairman, Soacehab, Inc. J. RON BRINSON, President and Chief Executive Officer, Board of Commissioners of The Port of New Orleans L. GARY BYRD, Consulting Engineer, Alexandria, Virginia A. RAY CHAMBER-LAIN, Executive Director, Colorado Department ofHighways L.