DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Transport Control – Types of Devices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Transport Control – Types of Devices Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Transport Control – Types of Devices Sydney 2020 Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Transport Control – Types of Devices Edition 3.0 prepared by: David Green and Kenneth Lewis Publisher Austroads Ltd. Edition 3.0 project manager: Richard Delplace Level 9, 287 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Abstract Phone: +61 2 8265 3300 The Austroads Guide to Traffic Management consists of 13 parts and [email protected] provides comprehensive coverage of traffic management guidance for www.austroads.com.au practitioners involved in traffic engineering, road design, town planning and road safety. About Austroads Part 10: Transport Control – Types of Devices is concerned with the tools that Austroads is the peak organisation of Australasian are required for traffic management and traffic control within a network. It road transport and traffic agencies. covers the various control devices used to regulate and guide traffic, including signs, traffic signals, pavement markings, delineators, and traffic islands. Austroads’ purpose is to support our member Other devices and technologies that convey information and guidance to road organisations to deliver an improved Australasian users while they are active in traffic are also included. road transport network. To succeed in this task, we undertake leading-edge road and transport Part 10 provides guidance on the design and use of particular traffic control research which underpins our input to policy devices that are applied to achieve or implement traffic management and development and published guidance on the control measures. It provides advice on the functions, suitability and correct design, construction and management of the road use of devices to create a more efficient and safer road traffic environment for network and its associated infrastructure. all users in permanent or temporary situations. Austroads provides a collective approach that delivers value for money, encourages shared Keywords knowledge and drives consistency for road users. Traffic control, traffic control devices, traffic management, traffic sign, traffic Austroads is governed by a Board consisting of signal, signal timing, pavement marking, rumble strip, variable message sign, senior executive representatives from each of its delineation, marker post, traffic island, local area traffic management, eleven member organisations: construction site • Transport for NSW Edition 3.0 published April 2020 • Department of Transport Victoria Edition 3.0 of the Guide has been updated with a new name and introduction • Queensland Department of Transport and Main to better reflect the content. Additional changes include: Roads • Section 2 was added using existing content to provide definitions and • Main Roads Western Australia functions of traffic control devices. • Department of Planning, Transport and • Section 3 was added using existing content to provide standards and road Infrastructure South Australia rules relating to transport control devices. • Department of State Growth Tasmania • Tram lane and tramway line markings were added into Section 8.3.8. • Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Edition 2.2 published February 2019 Logistics Northern Territory Edition 2.1 published January 2017 • Transport Canberra and City Services Edition 2.0 published August 2016 Directorate, Australian Capital Territory Edition 1.0 published August 2009 • Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications ISBN 978-1-925854-84-8 • Australian Local Government Association Austroads Project No. NTM6100 and NTM6118 Pages 228 • New Zealand Transport Agency. Austroads Publication No. AGTM10-20 © Austroads Ltd 2020 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without the prior written permission of Austroads. Acknowledgements First edition prepared by Gary Veith, Peter Croft, Robert Morgan and Agasteena Shah; and project managed by John Erceg. Edition 2.0 prepared by David Green and project managed by Fergus Tate. Edition 2.1 amendments prepared by Jeanette Ward, Chris Hall, Jamie Robertson, Paul Durdin and Dave Smith and project managed by Jeremy Burdan. This Guide is produced by Austroads as a general guide only. Austroads has taken care to ensure that this publication is correct at the time of publication. Austroads does not make any representations or warrant that the Guide is free from error, is current, or, where used, will ensure compliance with any legislative, regulatory or general law requirements. Austroads expressly disclaims all and any guarantees, undertakings and warranties, expressed or implied, and is not liable, including for negligence, for any loss (incidental or consequential), injury, damage or any other consequences arising directly or indirectly from the use of this Guide. Where third party information is contained in this Guide, it is included with the consent of the third party and in good faith. It does not necessarily reflect the considered views of Austroads Readers should rely on their own skill, care and judgement to apply the information contained in this Guide and seek professional advice regarding their particular issues. Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Transport Control – Types of Devices Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Intended User ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 How to Use ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Out of Scope ............................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Traffic Control and Communication Devices and the Safe System .................................................. 6 3. Standards and Road Rules relating to Transport Control Devices ................................................... 7 3.1 Australian/New Zealand Standards .......................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Road Rules and Traffic Control Devices .................................................................................................. 8 4. Principles and Application .................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Uniformity ................................................................................................................................................. 9 4.1.1 Importance .................................................................................................................................. 9 4.1.2 Areas of Desirable Uniformity ..................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Factors Affecting Performance ................................................................................................................. 9 4.2.1 Inappropriate Use ....................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.2 Maintenance ............................................................................................................................. 10 4.2.3 Environmental Factors .............................................................................................................. 10 4.2.4 Site Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 10 4.2.5 Road User Factors ................................................................................................................... 10 4.2.6 Design of Road or Facility ........................................................................................................ 10 4.2.7 Redundant Signs ...................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Signs and Markings ................................................................................................................................ 10 4.3.1 General Principles .................................................................................................................... 10 4.3.2 Considerations for Older Road Users and People with Disabilities ......................................... 12 4.4 Alignment with the National ITS Architecture ......................................................................................... 12 5. Signing and Marking Schemes ........................................................................................................... 13 5.1 Need for Signing and Marking Schemes ................................................................................................ 13 5.2 Principles for Preparation of Schemes ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vehicular Safety and Operations Assessment of Reserved Lanes Using Microscopic Simulation
    Vehicular Safety and Operations Assessment of Reserved Lanes using Microscopic Simulation Chao Li A Thesis in The Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Applied Science in Civil Engineering at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada Fall 2016 © Chao Li, 2016 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Chao Li Vehicular Safety and Operations Assessment of Reserved Lanes using Entitled: Microscopic Simulation and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science (Civil Engineering) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: Dr. A. M. Hanna Chair Dr. J. Y. Yu Examiner Dr. Z. Zhu Examiner Dr. C. Alecsandru Supervisor Approved by Dr. Fariborz Haghighat Chair of Department or Graduate Program Director Dr. Amir Asif Dean of Faculty Date Fall, 2016 ABSTRACT Vehicular Safety and Operations Assessment of Reserved Lanes using Microscopic Simulation Chao Li Evaluation of roadway safety via the analysis of vehicular conflicts using microscopic simulation shows increasing preference among transportation professionals, mostly due to significant advances in computational technology that allows for better efficiency when compared with other traffic safety modeling approaches. In addition, since modeling vehicular interactions via simulation is intrinsic to the methodology, one may assess various impacts of safety treatments without disrupting vehicle movements and before proceeding with real-world implementations. VISSIM, a microscopic traffic simulation model, is used in this thesis to reproduce vehicular interactions of an urban High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) arterial in Québec.
    [Show full text]
  • ROAD SAFETY: BASIC FACTS © Panos / Jacob Silberberg
    FACT SHEET #1 ROAD SAFETY: BASIC FACTS © Panos / Jacob Silberberg ROAD SAFETY AND MEDIA REPORTING Road traffic crashes are often covered in the media simply as events—not as a leading killer of people and an enormous drain on a country’s human, health and financial resources. By framing road safety as a health and development story, with data and in-depth information, journalists have the opportunity to affect the way these stories are told and potentially to help shift public behaviour and attitudes, influence policy and therefore contribute towards saving lives. WHY ARE ROAD TRAFFIC INJURIES A PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE? Road traffic injuries and deaths have a terrible 1.25 million impact on individuals, communities and road traffic deaths occur every year. countries. They involve massive costs to often overburdened health care systems, occupy scarce hospital beds, consume resources and result in significant losses of productivity and prosperity, with deep social and economic repercussions. The numbers speak for themselves: this is a cause of death among public health and development crisis that is expected to worsen unless action is taken. #1those aged 15-29 years For more on: road traffic injuries Global death figures drive home the extent of this public health crisis, especially among young people. FACT SHEET #1 Road safety: Basic facts – page 1 The chance 9.3 of dying Europe 19.9 in a road Eastern Mediterranean 17.0 traffic crash 15.9 South East Asia Americas 26.6 depends on where Africa 17.3 you live INTERPRETING THE NUMBERS MAGNITUDE • Tallying the total number of deaths can, • About 1.25 million people globally die each year however, be useful for conveying the magnitude as a result of road traffic crashes—that’s over 3400 of the problem, the prevention effort required deaths a day.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgiving Roadsides Design Guide
    Forgiving roadsides design guide Page 2 / 117 Authors: This report was drawn up by the IRDES ERA-NET 'Safety at the Heart of Road Design' Team: Author: Francesca La Torre, UNIFI, Italy (Representing ANAS in CEDR TG Road Safety) Contributors : Matthias Helfert, AIT, Austria Lorenzo Domenichini, UNIFI, Italy Philippe Nitsche, AIT, Austria Alessandro Mercaldo, UNIFI, Italy Yann Goyat, IFSTTAR, France Helen Fagerlind, CHALMERS, Sweden Eleonora Cesolini, ANAS, Italy Jan Martinsson, CHALMERS, Sweden Raffaella Grecco, ANAS, Italy Dennis Book, CHALMERS, Sweden Federica Bianchin, ANAS, Italy Peter Saleh, AIT, Austria (Main author of Annex A) With editorial input from the following members of CEDR Technical Group Road Safety: Harry Cullen Ireland (Chair) Francesca LA TORRE Italy Forbes VIGORS Ireland (Sec) Barbara RUBINO Italy Eva EICHINGER-VILL Austria Paul MANGEN Luxembourg Didier ANTOINE Belgium-Wallonia Herman MONING Netherlands Photis MATSIS Cyprus Arild ENGEBRETSEN Norway Reigo UDE Estonia Arild RAGNOY Norway Auli FORSBERG Finland Leszek KANIA Poland Gerard VUILLEMIN France Zvonko ZAVASNIK Slovenia Stefan MATENA Germany Roberto LLAMAS Spain Christina PANAGOLIA Greece Jose M. PARDILLO Spain Tibor MOCSÁRI Hungary Lena RYDEN Sweden Audur ARNADOTTIR Iceland Christoph JAHN Switzerland Giovanni MAGARO Italy Sandra BROWN United Kingdom This document expresses solely the current view of CEDR. Readers should not regard these views as a statement of the official position of CEDR's member states. Equally this document is considered as a guide; it is not a legally binding document. Approved and amended by: CEDR's EXECUTIVE BOARD on 7 March 2013 Addressed to: CEDR's GOVERNING BOARD on 15 May 2013 Edited and published by: CEDR's Secretariat General ISBN : 979-10-93321-02-8 Forgiving roadsides design guide Page 3 / 117 Foreword CEDR Technical Group Road Safety (TGRS) is very proud to have delivered one of the most significant documents in recent years on the subject of forgiving roadsides.
    [Show full text]
  • KANSAS MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT REPORT CODING MANUAL May 2014 Version 1.0
    KANSAS MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT REPORT CODING MANUAL May 2014 Version 1.0 RESOURCES: • Email [email protected] • Twitter Follow us on https://twitter.com/#!/KDOTCrashInfo • Facebook Friend Kdot CrashInfo at www.facebook.com • Phone 785.296.0456, 785.296.7789, 785.296.5169 • Addresses See page 3 • Stats/Ordering http://www.ksdot.org/lawinfo/ • Maps http://ksdot.maps.arcgis.com (Groups Law Enforcement) Significant Coding Manual Changes Since Version 2012, 1.0 Adjustments ♦ Modified KDOT Address and web link – Page 3 ♦ New road name options for unnamed trafficways – Page 7 & 15 o Example 23 ♦ Correction concerning parked emergency vehicles – Page 9 ♦ Clarification on “working vehicle” coding – Page 10 ♦ Added web links for Mile Marker and Access Control maps – Pages 14 & 17 ♦ Replaced example for Accident Location 12, 13, and 14 – Page 23 ♦ Enhancement to Latitude/Longitude wording – Page 19 ♦ Correction to Special Event coding instructions – Page 36 ♦ Clarification on co-owners of vehicles – Page 55 ♦ Clarification on Expiration Year – Page 55 ♦ Reminder concerning Vehicle Damage – Page 59 ♦ Clarification on Vehicle Sequence of Events coding – Page 60 ♦ Changed the examples to reflect the back of the 852 form – Page 62 ♦ Removed an incorrect legally parked vehicle exclusion – Page 40 ♦ Correction to Unusual Coding Situation: Cargo/debris – Page 93 ♦ Added Work Zone Category to the definitions section – Page 81 ♦ Report Examples: reviewed all for clarity, coding, correction – Page 96 ♦ Example 5: Added an illegally parked vehicle ♦ Example 23: New Parking Lot coding scenarios ♦ Quick Reference Check List – Outside Back Cover Note: There are a few other minor wording adjustments not listed above.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Verge Management
    HIGHWAY VERGE MANAGEMEN T Planning and Development Note Date 23rd January 2019 Version Number 2 Highway Verge Management Review Date 30th March 2024 Author Geoff Sinclair/Richard Edmonds Highway Verge Management PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT NOTE INTRODUCTION Planning and Development Notes (PDN) aim to review and collate the City Corporation’s (CoL) property management issues for key activities, alongside other management considerations, to give an overview of current practice and outline longer term plans. The information gathered in each report will be used by the CoL to prioritise work and spending, in order to ensure firstly that the COL’s legal obligations are met, and secondly that resources are used in an efficient manner. The PDNs have been developed based on the current resource allocation to each activity. An important part of each PDN is the identification of any potential enhancement projects that require additional support. The information gathered in each report will be used by CoL to prioritise spending as part of the development of the 2019-29 Management Strategy and 2019-2022 Business Plan for Epping Forest. Each PDN will aim to follow the same structure, outlined below though sometimes not all sections will be relevant: Background – a brief description of the activity being covered; Existing Management Program – A summary of the nature and scale of the activity covered; Property Management Issues – a list of identified operational and health and safety risk management issues for the activity; Management Considerations
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic and Road Sign Recognition
    Traffic and Road Sign Recognition Hasan Fleyeh This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of Napier University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2008 Abstract This thesis presents a system to recognise and classify road and traffic signs for the purpose of developing an inventory of them which could assist the highway engineers’ tasks of updating and maintaining them. It uses images taken by a camera from a moving vehicle. The system is based on three major stages: colour segmentation, recognition, and classification. Four colour segmentation algorithms are developed and tested. They are a shadow and highlight invariant, a dynamic threshold, a modification of de la Escalera’s algorithm and a Fuzzy colour segmentation algorithm. All algorithms are tested using hundreds of images and the shadow-highlight invariant algorithm is eventually chosen as the best performer. This is because it is immune to shadows and highlights. It is also robust as it was tested in different lighting conditions, weather conditions, and times of the day. Approximately 97% successful segmentation rate was achieved using this algorithm. Recognition of traffic signs is carried out using a fuzzy shape recogniser. Based on four shape measures - the rectangularity, triangularity, ellipticity, and octagonality, fuzzy rules were developed to determine the shape of the sign. Among these shape measures octangonality has been introduced in this research. The final decision of the recogniser is based on the combination of both the colour and shape of the sign. The recogniser was tested in a variety of testing conditions giving an overall performance of approximately 88%.
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington County Pavement Marking Specifications
    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ARLINGTON COUNTY PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIFICATIONS MAY 2017 T-1.1 PAVEMENT MARKINGS Table of Contents 1. General ................................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Design Criteria ...................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Marking Plan Preparation ..................................................................................................................... 4 Exhibits ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 MK – 1 Typical Crosswalk ......................................................................................................................... 5 MK – 1a Typical Crosswalk Details .............................................................................................................. 6 MK – 2 Typical Cross Section ..................................................................................................................... 7 MK – 3 Typical Speed Hump Markings ...................................................................................................... 8 MK – 4 Typical Speed Table ...................................................................................................................... 9 MK – 4a Typical Speed Hump Details .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Factors As Causes for Road Traffic Accidents in the Sultanate of Oman Under Consideration of Road Construction Designs
    Human Factors as Causes for Road Traffic Accidents in the Sultanate of Oman under Consideration of Road Construction Designs Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. phil.) der philosophischen Fakultät II (Psychologie, Pädagogik und Sportwissenschaft) der Universität Regensburg Vorgelegt von Kai Plankermann Burglengenfeld 2013 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. phil. Dr. h.c. Alf Zimmer Engineering Psychology Unit, University of Regensburg Zweiter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Mark W. Greenlee Institute of experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg 1 Acknowledgement I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Professor Alf Zimmer for accepting me as his PhD student and for providing me with his continuous support. I would also like to thank Dr. Abdullah Al-Maniri who supported me throughout the data collection in Oman. Also, I owe my gratitude to Aisha Al-Belushia who conducted the interviews at Ibra Hospital. Finally, I would like to thank the following persons for contributing to this thesis in one way or another and apologize to those I forgot to mention. The Engineers Altayeb Al-Harthi, Muhammad Al-Hosny (both Muscat Municipality) and Saleh Al- Shukaili (Directorate General for Road and Land Transportation) for providing the road data; the Drs. Muhamad Zaheerudeen (Khoula Hospital), Salem Al-Abri (Nizwa Hospital) and Ali Al-Dawi (Ibra Hospital) for facilitating the data collection at the hospitals; the Engineers Jochen Zimmermann (IJK Associates), Jens Aalund, Klaus Andersen (both COWI) and Jürgen Piel (STRABAG) for fruitful discussions about road safety in Oman; Muhamad Al-Aamri, Mahmud Al-Khatri, Yousuf Al-Rawahi and Mazin Al-Wahibi for helping me during the data collection; Chantal Blake and Amanda Amarotico for proofreading first drafts of this thesis; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Standard
    AS 1742.8—1990 Australian Standard Manual of uniform traffic control devices Part 8: Freeways This is a free 6 page sample. Access the full version online. This Australian Standard was prepared by Committee MS/12, Road Signs and Traffic Signals. It was approved on behalf of the Council of StandardsAustralia on 27 June 1990 and published on 8 October 1990. The following interests are represented on Committee MS/12: ACT Administration Australian Automobile Association Australian Local Government Association Australian Road Research Board Austroads Confederation of Australian Industry Department of Transport and Communications Department of Road Transport, South Australia Local Government Engineers Association of Victoria Main Roads Department, Queensland Railways of Australia Committee Roads & Traffic Authority, New South Wales Transport Commission, Tasmania Vic Roads Review of Australian Standards. To keep abreast of progress in industry, Australian Standards are subject to periodic review and are kept up to date by the issue of amendments or new editions as necessary. It is important therefore that Standards users ensure that they are in possession of the latest edition, and any amendments thereto. Full details of all Australian Standards and related publications will be found in the Standards This is a free 6 page sample. Access the full version online. Australia Catalogue of Publications; this information is supplemented each month by the magazine ‘The Australian Standard’, which subscribing members receive, and which gives details of new publications, new editions and amendments, and of withdrawn Standards. Suggestions for improvements to Australian Standards, addressed to the head office of Standards Australia, are welcomed. Notification of any inaccuracy or ambiguity found in an Australian Standard should be made without delay in order that the matter may be investigated and appropriate action taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Footpath & Cycleway Asset Management Plan
    SHIRE OF ESPERANCE Footpath & Cycleway Asset Management Plan Footpaths_Plan_2010_V3_Final - ii - Document Control Document ID: 59_07_070909_nams.plus_amp template v11 Rev No Date Revision Details Author Reviewer Approver V1 August 2010 1st Draft BP SAM Group V2 January 2011 Revised Register Data and text BP SAM Group V3 February 2011 Text update for Final BP © Copyright 2007 – All rights reserved. The Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia. - iii - TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................................................................................................. iv GLOSSARY ............................................................................................................................................................................................ v 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 What the Shire Provides ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 What does it Cost? ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Plans for the Future ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AS 1742.7-2007 Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices
    AS 1742.7—2007 (Incorporating Amendment No. 1) AS 1742.7—2007 Australian Standard® Manual of uniform traffic control devices Part 7: Railway crossings This is a free 8 page sample. Access the full version online. This Australian Standard® was prepared by Committee MS-012, Road Signs and Traffic Signals. It was approved on behalf of the Council of Standards Australia on 19 January 2007. This Standard was published on 20 February 2007. The following are represented on Committee MS-012: • AUSTROADS • Association of Consultants in Access Australia • Australasian Railway Association • Australian Automobile Association • Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry • Department of Infrastructure (Victoria) • Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources (Tasmania) • Independent Transport Safety & Reliability Regulator (NSW) • Main Roads Department, Queensland • Main Roads Western Australia • Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW • Transport SA This Standard was issued in draft form for comment as DR 05314. Standards Australia wishes to acknowledge the participation of the expert individuals that contributed to the development of this Standard through their representation on the Committee and through the public comment period. Keeping Standards up-to-date Australian Standards® are living documents that reflect progress in science, technology and systems. To maintain their currency, all Standards are periodically reviewed, and new editions are published. Between editions, amendments may be issued. Standards may also be withdrawn. It is important that readers assure themselves they are using a current Standard, which should include any amendments that may have been published since the Standard was published. Detailed information about Australian Standards, drafts, amendments and new projects can be found by visiting www.standards.org.au Standards Australia welcomes suggestions for improvements, and encourages readers to notify us immediately of any apparent inaccuracies or ambiguities.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation for Conservation of Rural Road Verges
    OCCASIONAL REPORTS No. 2 -OPERATION FOR CONSERVATION OF RURAL ROAD VERGES Co-operation between County Highway Departments and Conservation Organisations on the management of rural road verges and conservation of Sites of Special Interest A report based on information obtained from County Council Highway Departments, The County Naturalists' Trusts, Regional Officers of the Nature Conservancy Council, and the Biological Records Centre, up to May 1974 MONKS WOOD EXPERIMENTAL STATION The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (Natural Environment Research Council) Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon. INDEX Chapter I Introduction Chapter 11 Nature Conrervancy Southvert Ragion 1. Corwall 2. Devon 3. Dorret 4. Gloucerterrhire 5. Smerret Chapter I11 Nature Conservancy South Region 17 6. Berkrhire 7. Buckinghamrhire 8. Pmprhire 9. Inla of Wight 10. Oxfordrhire 11. Wiltrhire Chapter IV Nature Conrervancy Southeart Region 37 12. Hertfordrhire 13. Kent 14. Surrey 15. Eart Surrex 16. Wert Surra Chapter V Nature Conrervmcy Midland Region Cherhire Derbyrhire Herefordahire Leicer terrhire Northamptonahire Nottinghamrhire Rutland Shroprhire Staffordahire Warwickrhire Worcerterrhire Chapter VI Nature Conrervancy Eart Anglia Region Bedfordrhire Cambridge and Isle of Ely Errex Huntingdon and Plterborough Lincolnrhire - Holland Ker teven Lindrey Norfolk Ear t Suffolk Wert Suffolk Chapter VII Nature Conservancy North Region Cumber1 and 110 Durham 112 Lancashire 116 Northumberland 118 Wertmorland 120 Yorkrhire - East Riding 122 North Riding 1Z4 West Riding 126 Chapter VIII Nature Conrervancy North Wale8 Region 46. Anglesey 47. Caemrvonshire 48. Denbighshire 49. Flintshire 50. Merionethrhire 51. Hontgomeryshire Chapter IX Nature Conservancy South Wales Region 52. Brecknockshire 53. Cardiganahire 54. Camarthenshire 55. Glamorgan 56. Monmouthrhire 57. Pembrokerhire 58. Rndmrshire Chapter X Scotland Chapter XI Analysis of plant rpecier mentioned 153 Acknowledgements Bibliography Appendix A 169 Appendix B 179 Explanation of layout of lirtr of rite8 of Conservation Inside Importance in the report.
    [Show full text]