DOCSLIB.ORG

Crisis. What Crisis?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the hook. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 Nortfi Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9207146 Crisis! W hat crisis? The origins and evolution of foreign policy crisis Mihalkanin, Edward Styles, Ph.D. The American University, 1991 Copyright ©1991 by Mihalkanin, Edward Styles. All rights reserved. UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Aibor, MI 48106 CRISIS! WHAT CRISIS?: THE ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION OF FOREIGN POLICY CRISIS by Edward S. Mihalkanin submitted to the Faculty of the School of International Service of The American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations Signatures of the Committee: Chair: A/ J l viio L O (3^hr\JihAj Decean of the School Date 1991 The American University Washington, D.C. 20016 7^3^ t o AliERICM UKIVE3SITY LIBEAEY COPYRIGHT BY EDWARD S. MIHALKANIN 1991 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CRISIS! WHAT CRISIS? THE ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION OF FOREIGN POLICY CRISIS by Edward S. Mihalkanin ABSTRACT I propose that foreign policy crisis, as a type of event in international relations, arose much later than did the modern state system. Crisis originated at a specific time in response to changes which occurred in the modern state system. I critique the foreign policy crisis literature which tended to obscure both the origins and evolution of crisis because of the static conceptual­ izations writers had of the modern state system, their positivist methodology, and their ahistorical reasoning. I derived a definition of crisis from the most important writings within the crisis subfield. In order to use the insights of the crisis writers without being limited by their limitations mentioned above, I turned to the critical theory of Robert Cox and the configurative method of Harold Lasswell. Their emphases on origins, recursion, and replication provided a base from which I could inquire after the origins and evolution of crises. Developments in weaponry and the organization of the armed forces, new transportation and communication technologies, the rise of the nation-state, and innovations in conference diplomacy explain both the origins and evolution of crisis. Crisis arose when the decisionmakers of the Great Powers, fearing that Great Power war would lead to revolution after the end of Napoleonic wars, tried to find a way to settle their competing interests short of war. Crises that existed before 1871 were different from those that occurred after that date due to the uneven incorporation of the innovations mentioned above in the workings of the modern state system. Crises before 1871 shared the characteristics of longer duration, weak perception of crisis, and weak nationalism. To illustrate the similarities and differences which I believed existed among crises, I chose those representative of important conflicts among the Great Powers over long-standing diplomatic issues. They are the Anglo-French Near East Crisis of 1840, the Olmütz Crisis of 1850, the Seven Weeks War Crisis of 1866, the Fashoda Crisis of 1898, the Munich Crisis of 1938, and the US-USSR Nuclear Alert Crisis of 1973. I believe that I have demonstrated that these crises were in fact crises but that they also showed differences among themselves depending on what side of the 1871 divide they fell. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................. i ü Chapter: Page: 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1 Summary of Studies ................................. 2 Project Outline ..................................... 11 Justification of the Case Studies .............. 14 2. THE ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION OF FOREIGN POLICY CRISES ..................................................... 16 Introduction ........................................ 16 Review of Literature .............................. 17 The Critical Theory of Robert Cox .............. 27 Lasswell ............................................. 31 Historical Interpretation ........................ 36 Crises Differences ................................. 44 Summary ............................................... 46 3. THE ANGLO-FRENCH NEAR EAST CRISIS OF 1840 ......... 47 Introduction ........................................ 47 The Setting .......................................... 48 The Crisis ........................................... 53 Threat of War ................................. 53 Threat to High Priority Goals ............. 58 Threat to French Goals ............... 58 Threat to British Goals .............. 60 Time Constraints ............................. 64 Pre-1871 Crisis Characteristics ................ 65 Longer Duration .............................. 66 Weak Perception ofCrisis ................... 67 Weak Nationalism ............................. 70 Conclusion ........................................... 71 4. THE OLMÜTZ CRISIS OF 1850 .............................. 73 Introduction ........................................ 73 The Setting ......................................... 74 The Crisis .......................................... 78 Threat of War ................................. 78 Threat to High Priority Goals .............. 90 Time Constraints ............................. 96 Pre-1871 Crisis Characteristics ................ 97 Longer Duration .............................. 98 Weak Perception ofCrisis ................... 101 Weak Nationalism ............................. 105 Conclusion ........................................... 109 5. THE SEVEN WEEKS WAR CRISIS OF 1866 ................... Ill Introduction ........................................ Ill The Setting ......................................... 113 The Crisis .......................................... 117 Threat of War .................................. 118 Threat to High Priority Goals ............... 126 Time Constraints .............................. 130 Crisis Comparisons ................................. 132 Duration of Crises ......................... 132 Intermediate Nationalism ................... 135 Perception of Crisis ........................ 139 Conclusion ........................................... 141 6. THE FASHODA CRISIS OF 1898 ........................... 143 Introduction ........................................ 143 The Setting ......................................... 147 The Crisis .......................................... 152 Threat of War ........................... 152 Threat to High Priority Goals .............. 166 Threat to British Goals .............. 166 Threat to French Goals ............... 172 Time Constraints ............................. 178 Crisis Comparisons ................................. 179 Mass Nationalism ............................. 180 Duration of Crises .......................... 182 Perception of Crisis ........................ 183 Conclusion ........................................... 186 7. THE MUNICH CRISIS ...................................... 188 Introduction ........................................ 188 The Setting ......................................... 190 The Crisis .......................................... 198 Threat of War ................................. 199 Threat to High Priority Goals .............. 212 Czech Goals ............................. 212 French Goals ............................ 214 British Goals ........................... 217 German Goals ............................ 220 Time Constraints ............................. 224 Comparison of Crisis .............................. 227 Crisis Duration .............................. 227 Nationalism ................................... 230 Perception of Crisis ........................ 232 8. THE US-USSR NUCLEAR ALERT CRISIS OF 1973 ......... 236 Introduction ........................................ 236 The Setting ......................................... 238 The Crisis ........................................... 246 Threat to High Priority Goals ............. 247 Threat to Soviet Goals ............... 247 Threat to United States Goals ...... 253 Threat of War ................................. 256 Time Constraints ............................
Recommended publications
  • William Irvine on Britain, France and Appeasement: Anglo-French

    William Irvine on Britain, France and Appeasement: Anglo-French

    Martin Thomas. Britain, France and Appeasement: Anglo-French Relations in the Popular Front Era. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1996. x + 268 pp. $105.00, cloth, ISBN 978-1-85973-187-1. Reviewed by William D. Irvine Published on H-France (September, 1997) When Hitler remilitarized the Rhineland in peasing them, but wanted to demonstrate to the March 1936, Anglo-French relations were at a British that if, as they were certain would be the post-war low. To the problems of the 1920s--repa‐ case, their appeasement efforts failed, the failure rations, war debts, the middle east--were added could not be blamed on French truculence. the tensions over re-armament, France's eastern The book is based on an very thorough alliances, the Franco-Italian rapprochement, the knowledge of the relevant French and British ar‐ Anglo-German naval agreement, and mutual re‐ chives. It is classic diplomatic history, but pays criminations over the Ethiopian crisis. In essence, due obeisance to the importance of fnancial mat‐ the French found the British to be insensitive to ters and, at least with respect to France, demon‐ their security needs; the British found the French strates some sensitivity to domestic politics. None‐ obsession with security to be inimical to an un‐ theless, there remains a great deal of what Mon‐ derstanding with Germany. Paradoxically, on Mar‐ sieur X said to Lord Y in this account. No crime tin Thomas' account, the election of the Popular that, but at times it is uncommonly hard to dig a Front government, so different ideologically from clear thesis out of this dense text.
  • Vichy France and the Jews

    Vichy France and the Jews

    VICHY FRANCE AND THE JEWS MICHAEL R. MARRUS AND ROBERT 0. PAXTON Originally published as Vichy et les juifs by Calmann-Levy 1981 Basic Books, Inc., Publishers New York Contents Introduction Chapter 1 / First Steps Chapter 2 / The Roots o f Vichy Antisemitism Traditional Images of the Jews 27 Second Wave: The Crises of the 1930s and the Revival of Antisemitism 34 The Reach of Antisemitism: How Influential Was It? 45 The Administrative Response 54 The Refugee Crisis, 1938-41 58 Chapter 3 / The Strategy o f Xavier Vallat, i 9 4 !-4 2 The Beginnings of German Pressure 77 Vichy Defines the Jewish Issue, 1941 83 Vallat: An Activist at Work 96 The Emigration Deadlock 112 Vallat’s Fall 115 Chapter 4 / The System at Work, 1040-42 The CGQJ and Other State Agencies: Rivalries and Border Disputes 128 Business as Usual 144 Aryanization 152 Emigration 161 The Camps 165 Chapter 5 / Public Opinion, 1040-42 The Climax of Popular Antisemitism 181 The DistriBution of Popular Antisemitism 186 A Special Case: Algeria 191 The Churches and the Jews 197 X C ontents The Opposition 203 An Indifferent Majority 209 Chapter 6 / The Turning Point: Summer 1Q42 215 New Men, New Measures 218 The Final Solution 220 Laval and the Final Solution 228 The Effort to Segregate: The Jewish Star 234 Preparing the Deportation 241 The Vel d’Hiv Roundup 250 Drancy 252 Roundups in the Unoccupied Zone 255 The Massacre of the Innocents 263 The Turn in PuBlic Opinion 270 Chapter 7 / The Darquier Period, 1942-44 281 Darquier’s CGQJ and Its Place in the Regime 286 Darquier’s CGQJ in Action 294 Total Occupation and the Resumption of Deportations 302 Vichy, the ABBé Catry, and the Massada Zionists 310 The Italian Interlude 315 Denaturalization, August 1943: Laval’s Refusal 321 Last Days 329 Chapter 8 / Conclusions: The Holocaust in France .
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
  • London, Washington, and the Management of the Franc, 1936-39

    London, Washington, and the Management of the Franc, 1936-39

    PRINCETON STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL FINANCE, NO. 45 London, Washington, and the Management of the Franc, 1936-39 Ian M. Drummond INTERNATIONAL FINANCE SECTION DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS PRINCETON UNIVERSITY • 1979 - PRINCETON STUDIES , IN INTERNATIONAL. FINANCE This is the forty-fifth nurnber, in the series PRINCETON STUDIES IN IN- TERNATIONAL FINANCE, published from time to time by the .Interna- tional Finance Section of the Department of, Economics at Princeton University. The author, Ian M. Drummond, is a professor in the Department of Political Economy at the University of Toronto. He has also taught at Yale University and, as a visitor, at Princeton University and the Uni- versity of Edinburgh. Among his recent publications are British 'Eco- nomic Policy and the Empire, 1919.-1939, Imperial Economic Policy, 1917=1939, and Economics: Principles and Policies in an Open Econ- omy. / This series is intended to be restricted to meritorious research stud- ies in the general field of international financial problems that are too technical, too specialized, or too long to qualify as ESSAYS. The Section welcomes the submission of manuscripts for the series. While the 'Sec- tion ,sponsors the studies, the writers are free to develop their topics as they will. • PETER B. BENEN Director, International Finance Section PRINCETON STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL FINANCE NO. 45 London, Washington, and the Management of the Franc, 1936-39 Ian M. Drummond INTERNATIONAL FINANCE SECTION DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY NOVEMBER 1979 CONTENTS CAST OF CHARACTERS V 1 INTRODUCTION 1 The Tripartite Declarations 1 Historical Backdrop 3 Attitudes toward Cooperation and Mutual Support 4 2 BLUM AND AURIOL 9 3 CHAUTEMPS AND BONNET 16 4 CHAUTEMPS AND MARCHANDEAU 26 5 BLUM ONCE MORE 30 6 DALADIER AND MARCHANDEAU 32 7 TRANQUILLITY WITH DALADIER AND REYNAUD 39 8 MORGENTHAU AND THE FRENCH: CREDIT AND EXCHANGE CONTROL 42 9 SOME CONCLUSIONS 53 REFERENCES 57 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE SECTION EDITORIAL STAFF Peter B.
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbo', Michigan 48106 74-3188

    Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbo', Michigan 48106 74-3188

    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting

    University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting

    PATHS TO SUCCESS, PATHS TO FAILURE: HISTORICAL TRAJECTORIES TO DEMOCRATIC STABILITY By ADAM BILINSKI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2015 1 © 2015 Adam Bilinski 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Throughout the work on this project, I received enormous help from a number of people. The indispensable assistance was provided by my advisor Michael Bernhard, who encouraged me to work on the project since I arrived at the University of Florida. He gave me valuable and timely feedback, and his wide knowledge of the European political history and research methods proved irreplaceable in this regard. He is otherwise a warm, humble and an understanding person, a scholar who does not mind and even appreciates when a graduate student is critical toward his own ideas, which is a feature whose value cannot be overestimated. I received also valuable assistance from members of my dissertation committee: Benjamin Smith, Leonardo A. Villalon, Beth Rosenson and Chris Gibson. In particular, Ben Smith taught me in an accessible way about the foundational works in Political Science, which served as an inspiration to write this dissertation, while Chris Gibson offered very useful feedback on quantitative research methods. In addition, I received enormous help from two scholars at the University of Chicago, where this research project passed through an adolescent stage. Dan Slater, my advisor, and Alberto Simpser helped me transform my incoherent hypotheses developed in Poland into a readable master’s thesis, which I completed in 2007.
  • Gardes Des Sceaux En France, D'hier Et D'aujourd'hui

    Gardes Des Sceaux En France, D'hier Et D'aujourd'hui

    GARDES DES SCEAUX EN FRANCE D’HIER ET D’AUJOURD’HUI GARDES DESGARDES D’AUJOURD’HUI ET D’HIER EN FRANCE, SCEAUX GARDES DES SCEAUX EN FRANCE D’HIER ET D’AUJOURD’HUI ÉDITO Depuis près de 300 ans, sans interruption, la Chancellerie située place Vendôme, accueille les chanceliers de France, gardes des sceaux et ministres de la justice.Une fonction qui existe, elle, depuis 1545. Située sur l’une des plus prestigieuses places de Paris, la Chancellerie témoigne en ces lieux de la pérennité de l’État. Danton, d’Aguesseau, Cambacérès ... les noms de personnalités illustres résonnent dans l’hôtel de Bourvallais comme pour en scander l’histoire. Tous y ont laissé leur empreinte. Extension, embellissement de l’hôtel d’une part, affirmation de la fonction de ministre de la justice de l’autre, ainsi se sont entremêlés pendant près de trois siècles architecture, art et politique. GARDES DES SCEAUX · ANCIEN RÉGIME FRANÇOIS OLIVIER 28 avril 1545 - 22 mai 1551 Rois de France : François Ier et Henri II © Gallica.bnf.fr/Bibliothèque nationale de France 5 GARDES DES SCEAUX · ANCIEN RÉGIME JEAN DE BERTRAND 22 mai 1551- 10 juillet 1559 Roi de France : Henri II © Château de Versailles, Dist. RMN-Grand Palais/image château de Versailles 6 GARDES DES SCEAUX · ANCIEN RÉGIME FRANÇOIS OLIVIER 10 juillet 1559 - 2 janvier 1560 Roi de France : François II © Gallica.bnf.fr/Bibliothèque nationale de France 7 GARDES DES SCEAUX · ANCIEN RÉGIME JEAN DE MORVILLIER fin avril 1560 - 2 juin 1560 Roi de France : François II © Gallica.bnf.fr/Bibliothèque nationale de France 8 GARDES
  • Archives De La Famille Ferry

    Archives De La Famille Ferry

    Archives départementales des Vosges 40 J Archives de la famille Ferry (1813-1981) Répertoire numérique détaillé établi par Mélanie GLESS stagiaire, licence Gestion de l’information et du Document pour les Organisations à Mulhouse avec la collaboration de Benoît MARTIN attaché de conservation sous la direction d’Isabelle CHAVE , conservatrice du patrimoine, directrice des Archives départementales des Vosges Épinal, 2005/2006 INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________________________________ Historique du fonds Les archives de la famille Ferry sont entrées aux Archives départementales des Vosges en 1985 par voie extraordinaire. Elles ont été rassemblées par Hélène Ferry, épouse d’Abel, - lui-même neveu de Jules Ferry -, qui en a fait don pour une grande partie à sa fille Fresnette Pisani-Ferry. Cette dernière, dans son testament olographe du 8 février 1978, légua au musée des Ferry à Saint-Dié-des- Vosges « toutes les archives classées par sa mère ». Cependant, deux codicilles vinrent bouleverser leurs destinées en 1981 et 1982. En 1981, elle annula les précédentes dispositions au bénéfice de la bibliothèque municipale de Saint-Dié et fixa des conditions de conservation, de classement et d'accessibilité du fonds, dont le contrôle fut délégué au directeur du Centre national de la recherche scientifique. Le non respect de ces conditions avéré, elles furent léguées aux Archives de France en 1982, qui confirma, en 1985, la conservation physique du fonds aux Archives départementales des Vosges. Initialement conservé au chalet des Ferry à Saint-Dié, le fonds a donc été successivement conservé à la bibliothèque municipale de Saint-Dié, puis aux Archives départementales des Vosges, à Épinal. La correspondance de Jean Pisani-Ferry, exécuteur testamentaire de sa mère, Fresnette, et d’Odile Jurbert, directrice des Archives départementales des Vosges, en 1985, laisse à penser qu’une partie du fonds était toujours conservée dans une propriété de la famille Ferry à cette date.
  • A Comparative-Historical Sociology of Secularisation: Republican State Building in France (1875-1905) and Turkey (1908-1938)

    A Comparative-Historical Sociology of Secularisation: Republican State Building in France (1875-1905) and Turkey (1908-1938)

    A Comparative-Historical Sociology of Secularisation: Republican State Building in France (1875-1905) and Turkey (1908-1938) by Efe Peker MSc, Linköping University, 2006 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Joint Degree (Cotutelle) of Doctor of Philosophy Sociology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Simon Fraser University (Canada) and History, Faculty of Human Sciences at Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (France) © Efe Peker 2016 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON-SORBONNE Spring 2016 Approval Name: Efe Peker Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title: A Comparative-Historical Sociology of Secularisation: Republican State Building in France (1875-1905) and Turkey (1908-1938) Examining Committee: Chair: Wendy Chan Professor Gary Teeple Senior Supervisor Professor Patrick Weil Senior Supervisor Professor Centre d’histoire sociale du XXème siècle Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne Gerardo Otero Supervisor Professor School for International Studies Gilles Dorronsoro Internal Examiner Professor Political Science Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne Rita Hermon-Belot External Examiner Professor History École des hautes études en sciences sociales Philip Gorski External Examiner Professor Sociology Yale University Date Defended/Approved: March 11, 2016 ii Abstract This dissertation features a comparative-historical examination of macrosocietal secularisation in France (1875-1905) and Turkey (1908-1938), with particular attention to their republican state building experiences. Bridging
  • Le 7 Mars 1936

    Le 7 Mars 1936

    LE 7 MARS 1936 On s'explique mal que l'histoire courante, même quand" elle nous est contemporaine à une génération près, comme celle des dernières années de la IIP République, puisse abriter certaines lé­ gendes qu'un simple examen des faits et des dates suffit pourtant à dissiper. y Une des plus tenaces, dans l'opinion moyenne, a trait à l'oc­ cupation par Hitler de la zone démilitarisée de la Rhénanie, en mars 1936, et à l'attitude du gouvernement dans cette circonstance mémorable. Il est peu de Français, parmi ceux qui s'intéressent encore à la politique, qui ne s'en tiennent, de très bonne foi, à la version suivante : A la nouvelle, le samedi 7 mars, que la Wehrmacht vient d'en­ trer en Rhénanie neutre et de s'y installer, Albert Sarraut, pré­ sident du Conseil, prend sur lui de faire diffuser, le jour même, une déclaration de bravoure : « Nous ne laisserons pas Stras­ bourg sous les canons allemands !... » Mais Voici que, le lende­ main, les ministres réunis à l'EJysée, après une discussion ora­ geuse où quelques-uns d'entre eux — les « durs » — poussent à une action de force immédiate, tandis que les autres, et notam­ ment le ministre de la Guerre, n'entendent recourir aux armes que si l'on est prêt à décréter la mobilisation générale, décident à ta majorité de s'abstenir de toute intervention, désavouant ainsi le chef du gouvernement et mettant la France dans une posture d'autant moins honorable que le succès d'une opération militaire eût été, en l'occurrence, assuré.
  • Naissance Du Ministere Du Travail

    Naissance Du Ministere Du Travail

    NAISSANCE DU MINISTERE DU TRAVAIL (extraits du cahier du Chatefp n°1 octobre 1998) Emergence d'une administration spécifique Les années 1891 et 1892 peuvent donc être considérées comme fondatrices d'une véritable administration du travail, même si le terme travail apparaît seulement dans l'intitulé du ministère le 14 mars 1906 1. Existent en effet désormais : - une administration centrale spécifique (Office du travail en 1892, direction du travail constituée progressivement de 1895 à 1899) ; - des organes consultatifs dont le premier est constitué par le conseil supérieur du travail (1891) - une administration de terrain : l'inspection du travail (1892). En même temps, à partir de 1894, un service chargé de la prévoyance sociale se met en place. Avant l'arrivé de René Viviani, premier ministre du travail, le 25 octobre 1906, seize ministres se succéderont de 1891 à 1906 à la tête de ce département du commerce et de l'industrie, chargé du travail. Parmi eux : Jules Roche 17 mars 1890 - 5 décembre 1892 Jules Siegfried 6 décembre 1892 - 3 mars 1893 Victor Lourties 30 mai 1894 - 25 janvier 1895 Emile Mesureur novembre 1895 - 28 avril 1896 Pierre Maruejouls 28 juin 1898 - 31 octobre 1898 Alexandre Millerand 22 juin 1899 - 6 juin 1902 Georges Trouillot 7 juin 1902 - 24 janvier 1905 Fernand Dubief 25 Janvier 1905 - 12 novembre 1905 Georges Trouillot 13 novembre 1905 - 14 mars 1906 Gaston Doumergue 13 avril 1906 - 24 octobre 1906 Tout au long de cette période où se discute la création du ministère du travail les nombreux rapports élaborés par le conseil supérieur du travail et l'Office nourrissent la réflexion et l'action des hommes politiques, notamment deux des ministres chargés du travail, Jules Roche et Alexandre Millerand.
  • Page 543 H-France Review Vol. 2 (December 2002), No. 135 Kenneth

    Page 543 H-France Review Vol. 2 (December 2002), No. 135 Kenneth

    H-France Review Volume 2 (2002) Page 543 H-France Review Vol. 2 (December 2002), No. 135 Kenneth Mouré and Martin Alexander, Eds., Crisis and Renewal in France, 1918-1962. New York: Berghahn Books, 2002. vii + 312 pp. $75.00 U.S. (cl). Notes, list of contributors, and index. ISBN 1- 57181-146-X. Review by Irwin Wall, University of California, Riverside. Any compendium of essays presents unique challenges to the reviewer, and this one is no exception. The hardest part is finding a unifying theme. Of course the authors offer one: they argue that unlike Stanley Hoffmann's lament about the 1930s, when the "stalemate society" caused France to collapse, today France has met the challenges of the modern era: it is a stable industrial democracy with a high standard of living, one of the few very privileged countries of the world. The essays in the volume are devoted to showing how particular challenges or crises did or did not result in the necessary "renewal" in the political and social development of modern France, with the implied happy ending. There is a sub-text, too, purporting to demonstrate that where crisis was not met, and change was successfully opposed, crisis nevertheless served to break down resistance to renewal. But nations are almost always in crisis, and they are always responding to crisis and attempting renewal; it would seem that is what politics is all about. France had 120 cabinet "crises" alone during the seventy years of the Third Republic's existence. Crisis was endemic and permanent in all walks of life; it provides the broadest and hence least meaningful of conceptual frameworks, and yet it still is not enough to unify the essays, for the authors only episodically frame their essays in terms of crisis and renewal in the first place.