Imperial Priests and Martyrs: Pretexts for State Violence and Religious Change in France, 1848-1871
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2015 Imperial Priests and Martyrs: Pretexts for State Violence and Religious Change in France, 1848-1871 Benjamin Tyner Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1165 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] IMPERIAL PRIESTS AND MARTYRS Pretexts for State Violence and Religious Change in France, 1848-1871 by BENJAMIN TYNER A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York 2015 ii 2015 Benjamin Tyner Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History to satisfy the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _____________________ _______________________________________________ Date DAVID TROYANSKY, Chair of Examining Committee _____________________ _______________________________________________ Date HELENA ROSENBLATT, Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: _______________________________________________ EVELYN ACKERMAN _______________________________________________ DAGMAR HERZOG _______________________________________________ BRENNA MOORE iv Abstract Imperial Priests and Martyrs: Pretexts for State Violence and Religious Change in France, 1848-1871 by Benjamin Tyner Advisor: Professor David Troyansky This dissertation examines the lives and political significance of five French Catholic priests who were murdered between 1848 and 1871. Using French newspapers, printed religious texts and pamphlets, hagiographic biographies and other sources, I show the many ways in which French priests were wittingly and unwittingly used by the French Second Republic (1848-52), Second Empire (1852-70) and the Paris Commune (1871) and Third Republic (1870-1940). Archbishop of Paris Denis Auguste Affre (1848), Saint Augustin Schoeffler (1851), Archbishop of Paris Marie-Dominique-Auguste Sibour (1857), Saint Théophane Vénard (1861), and Arch- bishop of Paris Georges Darboy (1871) were all killed more for their relationship to the French state than for their religious beliefs. In mid-nineteenth-century France, martyrdom served as a powerful cultural symbol demarcating good and evil and identifying appropriate targets for vio- lence. Despite the ultimately secular causes of their deaths, all of the murdered priests discussed (except Sibour) were called martyrs by those who found them inspiring, motivating and useful and were subsequently used as pretexts for asymmetrical violence visited upon those held ac- countable for their murder, only contributing to their reputation as members of an imperial priesthood. I show how a series of political decisions made in the 1850s by French Catholics al- lied with the archbishops of Paris increasingly tied institutional French Catholicism to the gov- ernment of the Second Empire for its survival. But by tying themselves ever closer to the empire, the archbishops of Paris became vulnerable to changing attitudes towards the empire itself. When the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1) swept the empire away the government that followed (ulti- v mately as the Third Republic) seemed ready to scapegoat Paris for all French woes. In despera- tion, members of the Paris Commune (1871) expressed their frustration at the previous decades with the demolition of imperial symbols, including the imperial priesthood itself. vi Acknowledgments This manuscript required contributions from so many. I would like to express my deep gratitude to the Graduate Center, CUNY, for allowing me the opportunity to pursue this course of study and the time needed to complete it. I would also like to thank my entire committee for their patience and advice. In particular, I’m sincerely grateful for the time and encouragement offered by Professor Evelyn Ackerman and the dedicated and detailed support given to me by my advisor, Professor David Troyansky. Without their help this manuscript would never have been completed. In addition, I’m profoundly thankful for Union College, which employed me, supported my dissertation needs and provided encouragement and financial support. My colleagues in the Humanities department at Union College took every opportunity to protect my time, to offer me wisdom and counseling, and to make excuses for responsibilities I neglected in favor of dissertation work. I’d like to thank my friends for their unwavering confidence in me and for their willingness to provide help whenever it was needed. With all of my heart, I thank my parents, Stuart and Karen Tyner, and my siblings, Erin Miller and Matt Tyner, who offered constant emotional availability and always-optimistic assessments of my progress. I’m so thankful for Gabriel and Lyra, who cheerfully sacrificed many hours of time with their father. Most of all, I’m grateful for Jenny, without whom none of this was remotely possible, who gave up countless professional opportunities and carried unequal domestic burdens along the way, and who nevertheless believed in me and rooted for me from start to finish. Thank you, Jenny, I love you. vii Dedication For Georgette: There is no finer life. viii Table of Contents Abstract iv Acknowledgments vi Dedication vii List of Illustrations ix Introduction 1 Chapter 1: 1848 - Post-Springtime Wilt 20 Chapter 2: 1850s - The Crucible of Crimea 65 Chapter 3: 1850s - Debris of Demons 116 Chapter 4: 1860s - Down with the Goddesses 176 Conclusion 243 Bibliography 247 ix List of Illustrations 1. Frédéric Sorrieu, La République universelle démocratique et sociale - Le Pacte, 1848. From: L’Histoire par l’image, http://www.histoire- image.org/pleincadre/index.php?i=80&id_sel=undefined (accessed June 22, 2012). 28 2. “Martyrs Morts pour l'Ordre et la République.” Print reproduction (by author) from: Chez Bèz et Dubreuil, June 1848. 34 3. Honoré Daumier, “Dernier conseil des ex ministres.” Le Charivari, March 9, 1848. From: Benjamin A. and Julia M. Trustman Collection of Honoré Daumier Lithographs, Robert D. Farber University Archives & Special Collections Department, Brandeis University, http://bir.brandeis.edu/handle/10192/2114 (accessed June 22, 2012). 56 4. Honoré Daumier, “Un Citoyen Exaspéré par les Buffleteries.” Le Charivari, April 1, 1848. From: Benjamin A. and Julia M. Trustman Collection of Honoré Daumier Lithographs, Robert D. Farber University Archives & Special Collections Department, Brandeis University, http://hdl.handle.net/10192/2116 (accessed June 22, 2012). 57 5. Honoré Daumier, “Paquebot Napoléonien.” Le Charivari, December 2, 1848. From: Benjamin A. and Julia M. Trustman Collection of Honoré Daumier Lithographs, Robert D. Farber University Archives & Special Collections Department, Brandeis University, http://hdl.handle.net/10192/2122 (accessed June 22, 2012). 59 6. Honoré Daumier, “Nouveau joujou dédié par Ratapoil aux enfans des Décembristes.” Le Charivari, October 16, 1851. From: Benjamin A. and Julia M. Trustman Collection of Honoré Daumier Lithographs, Robert D. Farber University Archives & Special Collections Department, Brandeis University, http://hdl.handle.net/10192/2523 (accessed June 22, 2012). 62 7. Martyre de Saint Augustin Schoeffler: Son-Tay, 1851, Vietnamese painting, artist unknown. Public domain, available from: https://www.tumblr.com/search/vietnamese%20martyrs (accessed June 22, 2012). 118 8. MEP missionaries departing for the mission field, 1856. Public domain, available from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MEP_Departures_of_1856.jpg accessed June 22, 2012). 142 x 9. Hector Viger, Archevêque Georges Darboy, 1878. Public domain, available from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Georges_Darboy#/media/File:Georgesdarboy. jpg accessed June 22, 2012). 197 10. Guillaume-Alphonse Cabasson, L’Apothéose de Napoleon III, 1854. Public domain, available from: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'affaire_du_sacre_de_Napol%C3%A9on_III#/media/File:Apot heosis_of_Napoleon_III.jpg (accessed June 22, 2012). 204 11. Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux Monseigneur Darboy dans sa prison, 1871. From: L’Histoire par l’image, http://www.histoire-image.org/pleincadre/index.php?i=46 (accessed June 22, 2012). 219 12. “Affre et Darboy, les deux martyrs,” 1871. Print reproduction (by author) from: Archives of the Archdiocese of Paris. 221 13. Jehan Georges Vibert, Apothéose aux funérailles de Thiers, 1877. From: L’Histoire par l’image, http://www.histoire- image.org/pleincadre/index.php?a=368&v=1877&w=1877&d=1&i=444 (accessed June 22, 2012). 242 1 INTRODUCTION This dissertation examines the lives and political significance of five French Catholic priests who were murdered between 1848 and 1871. Archbishop of Paris Denis Auguste Affre (1848), Saint Augustin Schoeffler (1851), Archbishop of Paris Marie-Dominique-Auguste Si- bour (1857), Saint Théophane Vénard1 (1861), and Archbishop of Paris Georges Darboy (1871) were killed in distinct historical moments. But all of them also have one thing in common not previously noted by historians. All of these “martyrs”2 were killed more for their relationship