Catherine the Great

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Catherine the Great Catherine the Great Catherine II[a] (born Sophie of Anhalt-Zerbst; 2 May 1729 in Szczecin – 17 Catherine II November 1796[b]), most commonly known as Catherine the Great,[c] was Empress of All Russia from 1762 until 1796—the country's longest-ruling female leader. She came to power following a coup d'état that overthrew her husband and second cousin, Peter III. Under her reign, Russia grew larger, its culture was revitalised, and it was recognized as one of the great powers worldwide. In her accession to power and her rule of the empire, Catherine often relied on her noble favourites, most notably Count Grigory Orlov and Grigory Potemkin. Assisted by highly successful generals such as Alexander Suvorov and Pyotr Rumyantsev, and admirals such as Samuel Greig and Fyodor Ushakov, she governed at a time when the Russian Empire was expanding rapidly by conquest and diplomacy. In the south, the Crimean Khanate was crushed following victories over the Bar confederation and Ottoman Empire in the Russo-Turkish War, 1768-1774 due to the support of the United Kingdom, and Russia colonised the territories of Novorossiya along the coasts of the Black and Azov Seas. In the Portrait of Catherine II in her 50s, by Johann west, the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, ruled by Catherine's former lover, Baptist von Lampi the Elder King Stanisław August Poniatowski, was eventually partitioned, with the Empress of Russia Russian Empire gaining the largest share. In the east, Russia started to colonise Reign 9 July 1762 – 17 November 1796 Alaska, establishing Russian America. Coronation 22 September 1769 Catherine reformed the administration of Russian guberniyas (governorates), and Predecessor Peter III many new cities and towns were founded on her orders. An admirer of Peter the Successor Paul I Great, Catherine continued to modernize Russia along Western European lines. However, military conscription and the economy continued to depend on Empress consort of Russia serfdom, and the increasing demands of the state and of private landowners Tenure 5 January – 9 July 1762 intensified the exploitation of serf labour. This was one of the chief reasons behind rebellions, including the large-scale Pugachev Rebellion of Cossacks, Born Princess Sophie of Anhalt-Zerbst nomads, peoples of Volga and peasants. 2 May [O.S. 21 April] 1729 Stettin, Pomerania, Prussia [1] The period of Catherine the Great's rule, the Catherinian Era, is considered a (now Szczecin, Poland) Golden Age of Russia.[2] The Manifesto on Freedom of the Nobility, issued Died 17 November [O.S. 6 during the short reign of Peter III and confirmed by Catherine, freed Russian November] 1796 (aged 67) nobles from compulsory military or state service. Construction of many mansions of the nobility, in the classical style endorsed by the empress, changed the face of Winter Palace, Saint Petersburg, the country. She enthusiastically supported the ideals of the Enlightenment and is Russian Empire often included in the ranks of the enlightened despots.[3] As a patron of the arts, Burial Saints Peter and Paul Cathedral, she presided over the age of the Russian Enlightenment, including the Saint Petersburg establishment of the Smolny Institute for Noble Maidens, the first state-financed Spouse higher education institution for women in Europe. Peter III of Russia (m. 1745; died 1762) Issue Paul I of Russia Contents among others... Early life Full name Marriage, reign of Peter III, and coup d'état German: Sophie Friederike Reign (1762–96) Auguste Coronation (1762) Foreign affairs Russian: Екатерина Economics and finance Алексеевна Романова, Government organization romanized: Yekaterina Alekseyevna Romanova Serfs Arts and culture English: Catherine Alexeievna Education Romanova Religious affairs House Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov (by Personal life marriage) Poniatowski Ascania (by birth) Orlov Father Christian August, Prince of Potemkin Anhalt-Zerbst Final months and death Mother Princess Johanna Elisabeth of Children Holstein-Gottorp Royal descendants Religion Russian Orthodox (1744–1796) British royalty prev. Lutheran (1729–1744) Danish royalty Signature Dutch royalty Spanish royalty Swedish royalty Title In popular culture Ancestry List of prominent Catherinians See also References Sources Further reading External links Early life Catherine was born in Stettin, Pomerania, Kingdom of Prussia (now Szczecin, Poland) as Princess Sophie Friederike Auguste von Anhalt-Zerbst-Dornburg. Her father, Christian August, Prince of Anhalt-Zerbst, belonged to the ruling German family of Anhalt.[4] He tried to become the duke of Duchy of Courland and Semigallia but in vain and at the time of his daughter's birth held the rank of a Prussian general in his capacity as governor of the city of Stettin. But because of conversion of her second cousin Peter III to Orthodox Christianity, two of her first cousins became Kings of Sweden: Gustav III and Charles XIII.[5] In accordance with the custom then prevailing in the ruling dynasties of Germany, she received her education chiefly from a French governess and from tutors. According to her memoirs, Sophie was regarded as a tomboy, and trained herself to master a sword. Just prior to her arrival in Russia, she participated in a duel with her female second cousin from Anhalt. During this duel between noble girls, both exchanged sword-to-sword blows only, as they both had a fear of it leading to bloodletting. Sophie came to be known by the nickname Fike.[6] Sophie's childhood was very uneventful apart from the duel. She once wrote to her correspondent Baron Grimm: "I see nothing of interest in it."[7] Although Sophie was born a princess, her family had very little money. Her rise to power was supported by her mother's wealthy relatives, who were both nobles and royal relations. Her mother's brother became the heir to the Swedish throne after her second cousin Peter III converted to Orthodoxy.[8][9] The more than 300 sovereign entities of the Holy Roman Empire, many of them quite small and powerless, made for a highly competitive political system as the various princely families fought for advantage over each other, often via political marriages.[10] For the smaller German princely families, an advantageous marriage was one of the best means of advancing their interests, and the young Sophie was groomed throughout her childhood to be the wife of some powerful ruler in order to improve the position of the reigning house of Anhalt. Besides her native German, Sophie became fluent in French, the lingua franca of European elites in the 18th century.[11] The young Sophie received the standard education for an 18th- century German princess, with a concentration upon learning the etiquette expected of a lady, French, and Lutheran theology.[12] Sophie first met her future husband, who would become Peter III of Russia, at the age of 10. Peter was her second cousin. Based on her writings, she found Peter detestable upon meeting him. She disliked his pale complexion and his fondness for alcohol at such a young age. Peter also still played with toy soldiers. She later wrote that she stayed at one end of the castle, and Peter at the other.[13] Marriage, reign of Peter III, and coup d'état The choice of Princess Sophie as wife of the future tsar was one result of the Lopukhina Conspiracy in which Count Lestocq and Prussian king Frederick the Great took an active part. The object was to strengthen the friendship between Prussia and Russia, to weaken the influence of Austria and to ruin the chancellor Aleksey Petrovich Bestuzhev-Ryumin, on whom Russian Empress Elizabeth relied, and who was a known partisan of the Austrian alliance. The diplomatic intrigue failed, largely due to the intervention of Sophie's mother, Johanna Elisabeth of Holstein-Gottorp. Historical accounts portray Johanna as a cold, abusive woman who loved gossip and court intrigues. Her hunger for fame centred on her daughter's prospects of becoming empress of Russia, but she infuriated Empress Elizabeth, who eventually banned her from the country for spying for King Frederick II of Prussia. Empress Elizabeth knew the family well: She had intended to marry Princess Johanna's brother Charles Augustus (Karl August von Holstein), but he died of smallpox in 1727 before the wedding could take place.[14] Despite Johanna's interference, Empress Elizabeth took a strong liking to Sophie, and her marriage to Peter eventually took place in 1745. When Sophie arrived in Russia in 1744, she spared no effort to ingratiate herself not only with Empress Elizabeth, but with her husband and with the Russian people as well. She applied herself to learning the Russian language with zeal, rising at night and walking about her bedroom barefoot, Young Catherine soon after repeating her lessons. This practice led to a severe attack of pneumonia in March 1744. When she her arrival in Russia, by wrote her memoirs, she said she made the decision then to do whatever was necessary and to profess Louis Caravaque to believe whatever was required of her to become qualified to wear the crown. Although she mastered the language, she retained an accent. Sophie recalled in her memoirs that as soon as she arrived in Russia, she fell ill with a pleuritis that almost killed her. She credited her survival to frequent bloodletting; in a single day, she had four phlebotomies. Her mother, who was opposed to this practice, fell into the empress's disfavour. When Sophie's situation looked desperate, her mother wanted her confessed by a Lutheran pastor. Awaking from her delirium, however, Sophie said: "I don't want any Lutheran; I want my Orthodox father [clergyman]." This raised her in the empress's esteem. Princess Sophie's father, a devout German Lutheran, opposed his daughter's conversion to Eastern Orthodoxy.
Recommended publications
  • Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796
    Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 By Thomas Lucius Lowish A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor Kinch Hoekstra Spring 2021 Abstract Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 by Thomas Lucius Lowish Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Historians of Russian monarchy have avoided the concept of sovereignty, choosing instead to describe how monarchs sought power, authority, or legitimacy. This dissertation, which centers on Catherine the Great, the empress of Russia between 1762 and 1796, takes on the concept of sovereignty as the exercise of supreme and untrammeled power, considered legitimate, and shows why sovereignty was itself the major desideratum. Sovereignty expressed parity with Western rulers, but it would allow Russian monarchs to bring order to their vast domain and to meaningfully govern the lives of their multitudinous subjects. This dissertation argues that Catherine the Great was a crucial figure in this process. Perceiving the confusion and disorder in how her predecessors exercised power, she recognized that sovereignty required both strong and consistent procedures as well as substantial collaboration with the broadest possible number of stakeholders. This was a modern conception of sovereignty, designed to regulate the swelling mechanisms of the Russian state. Catherine established her system through careful management of both her own activities and the institutions and servitors that she saw as integral to the system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor an Eigliteentli-Centuryfarce By
    The VO Russian and East European Studies Center is proud to present The Minor an eigliteentli-centuryfarce by Denis Fonvizin HedopoCJlb ,[I;eHHca <POHBH3HHa :9Liapteaby Ju[ia Nimirovs~aya 'With Songs by'Yu[ii 1(jm fJ)irector~ 9{ptes Russia in the 18th century was known as a "woman's kingdom." During the course of almost 70 years there was a woman on the throne. Longer than any other ruled the most powerful, the most clever and educated of them all-Catherine the Great. Many Western philosophers, such as Voltaire and Diderot, considered her a truly enlightened monarch. Denis Fonvizin was the secretary of her personal enemy, Count Panin. Fonviziil wrote his most famous comedy The Minor in 1782; it is one of the 10 most famous Russian plays in the canon and one of the most frequently produced. Contemporaries read it as a criticism of female dominance and a satire on Catherine's reign, with the message that a strong woman is worse than a tyrannical man. The play's other goal was to show the audience that education improves people morally, while ignorance allows them to degrade and become mere beasts (thus the pig-loving Skotinin). In this comedy, all the educated people are kind and good, and all the uneducated people behave like animals. Of course, according to the laws of classical comedy, light and goodness con~er darkness and malice. It was not always this way in the 18t century-goodness did not always win. But we remember this century as a time of brilliant individualities, when strong personalities, eccentrics, and other talented people made their mark.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inextricable Link Between Literature and Music in 19Th
    COMPOSERS AS STORYTELLERS: THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN LITERATURE AND MUSIC IN 19TH CENTURY RUSSIA A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Music Ashley Shank December 2010 COMPOSERS AS STORYTELLERS: THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN LITERATURE AND MUSIC IN 19TH CENTURY RUSSIA Ashley Shank Thesis Approved: Accepted: _______________________________ _______________________________ Advisor Interim Dean of the College Dr. Brooks Toliver Dr. Dudley Turner _______________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Mr. George Pope Dr. George R. Newkome _______________________________ _______________________________ School Director Date Dr. William Guegold ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECULAR ART MUSIC IN RUSSIA……..………………………………………………..……………….1 Introduction……………………..…………………………………………………1 The Introduction of Secular High Art………………………………………..……3 Nicholas I and the Rise of the Noble Dilettantes…………………..………….....10 The Rise of the Russian School and Musical Professionalism……..……………19 Nationalism…………………………..………………………………………..…23 Arts Policies and Censorship………………………..…………………………...25 II. MUSIC AND LITERATURE AS A CULTURAL DUET………………..…32 Cross-Pollination……………………………………………………………...…32 The Russian Soul in Literature and Music………………..……………………...38 Music in Poetry: Sound and Form…………………………..……………...……44 III. STORIES IN MUSIC…………………………………………………… ….51 iii Opera……………………………………………………………………………..57
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Question of the Main Concepts and Theories of the Origin of the State
    Law/1. Theory of State and Law Zhadan V. N. PhD in Law, Associate Professor Kazan Federal University, Elabuga Institute, Russia ON THE QUESTION OF THE MAIN CONCEPTS AND THEORIES OF THE ORIGIN OF THE STATE Abstract. The article is devoted to the discussion of the main concepts and theories of the origin of the state based on the analysis of General theoretical provisions of legal science, scientific approaches and author's understanding. Key words: question, basic, concept, theory, origin, state, analysis, General theoretical provisions, approaches. In the science of state and law (and especially the theory of state and law), there are many scientific materials that consider the laws of the origin, development and functioning of the state and law, historical types, forms, functions and other aspects that characterize the state and law [1-2]. Many scientists specializing in the theory of state and law (and in other areas of scientific research) offer their views on the theoretical characteristics of the state and law, their features, state-political forms and functions, and many other aspects, which does not deprive the author to Express his opinion on some issues related to the discussion of the origin of the state. The subject of this review will be questions about the main concepts and theories of the origin of the state. Based on the research subject of interest the following questions: what is a theory of the origin of the state; what the right science is called basic theory of the origin of the state; what are the terms "concept" and "theory"; which is accepted to highlight the concepts and theories of the origin of the state; how key concepts and theories explain the emergence of the state? The author shares the scientific approach that the study of theories of the origin of the state (and law) is not only cognitive (theoretical), but also political and practical in nature [3, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use and Abuse of Thomas Paine CONFERENCE PROGRAMME
    Citizen of the World: The Use and Abuse of Thomas Paine CONFERENCE PROGRAMME Manchester Metropolitan University and the People’s History Museum, 29-30 November 2013 Friday 29 November 8.30am-9.30am: Registration and Welcome 9.30am-11.30am: Panel One: Paine, Democracy, and the Rights of Man Chair: TBC Gregory Claeys (Royal Holloway) ‘Paine and Rights’ Maurizio Griffo (University "Federico II" – Naples) ‘Thomas Paine and the Two Kinds of Natural Rights: A Biographical Approach’ Patrick Thomas (Aberystwyth) ‘Man as Neighbour in Paine’s Political Thought’ Gary Berton (Iona College and Thomas Paine National Historical Association) ‘The Distortion of Paine’s Philosophy of Government in Modern Politics’ 11.30am-12pm: Tea and Coffee break 12pm-1.30pm: Panel Two: Paine, Christianity and Deism Chair: TBC Benjamin E. Park (Cambridge): ‘The Age of Christianities: Paine’s Deism, America’s Identities, and the Fracturing of Political Theologies in the Newly United States’ Rosina Martucci (Salerno) ‘Thomas Paine: Discovering the Religious Side of his Soul’ Theodore W. Marotta (SUNY, Albany) ‘Defending God: Thomas Paine’s Last Crusade’ 1.30-2.30pm: Lunch 2.30pm-4pm: Panel Three: The Image and Idea of Paine in a Transatlantic Context Chair: Catherine Armstrong (MMU) Matteo Battistini (Bologna) Atlantic Fragments of Thomas Paine: Democratic Language and its Class Meaning in Paine’s Early Nineteenth Century Legacy on both the English and American Shores of the Ocean. Sam Edwards (MMU) ‘He Came From America Didn’t He? Identity, Nationality and the 1964 Thetford
    [Show full text]
  • BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: the EMERGENCE of a NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM in RUSSIA by Alyssa J. Deblasio Bachelor of Arts, Villanova
    BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM IN RUSSIA by Alyssa J. DeBlasio Bachelor of Arts, Villanova University, 2003 Master of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2006 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2010 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Alyssa J. DeBlasio It was defended on May 14, 2010 and approved by Tatiana Artemyeva, Professor, Herzen State Pedagogical University (St. Petersburg, Russia), Department of Theory and History of Culture Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures James P. Scanlan, Emeritus Professor, The Ohio State University, Department of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Nancy Condee, Associate Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures ii Copyright © by Alyssa J. DeBlasio 2010 iii BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM IN RUSSIA Alyssa J. DeBlasio, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2010 This dissertation takes as its primary task the evaluation of a conflict of paradigms in Russian philosophical thought in the past decade. If until the early nineties Russian philosophers were often guilty of uncritically attributing to their domestic philosophy a set of characteristics that fell along the lines of a religious/secular binary (e.g. literary vs. analytic; continuous vs. ruptured), in recent years the same scholarship is moving away from the nineteenth-century model of philosophy as a “path” or “special mission,” as it has been called by Konstantin Aksakov, Aleksei Khomiakov, Ivan Kireevskii, and later, Nikolai Berdiaev, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN TRADITION of the KNIGHTS of MALTA OSJ The
    RUSSIAN TRADITION OF THE KNIGHTS OF MALTA OSJ The Russian tradition of the Knights Hospitaller is a collection of charitable organisations claiming continuity with the Russian Orthodox grand priory of the Order of Saint John. Their distinction emerged when the Mediterranean stronghold of Malta was captured by Napoleon in 1798 when he made his expedition to Egypt. As a ruse, Napoleon asked for safe harbor to resupply his ships, and then turned against his hosts once safely inside Valletta. Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch failed to anticipate or prepare for this threat, provided no effective leadership, and readily capitulated to Napoleon. This was a terrible affront to most of the Knights desiring to defend their stronghold and sovereignty. The Order continued to exist in a diminished form and negotiated with European governments for a return to power. The Emperor of Russia gave the largest number of Knights shelter in St Petersburg and this gave rise to the Russian tradition of the Knights Hospitaller and recognition within the Russian Imperial Orders. In gratitude the Knights declared Ferdinand von Hompesch deposed and Emperor Paul I was elected as the new Grand Master. Origin Blessed Gerard created the Order of St John of Jerusalem as a distinctive Order from the previous Benedictine establishment of Hospitallers (Госпитальеры). It provided medical care and protection for pilgrims visiting Jerusalem. After the success of the First Crusade, it became an independent monastic order, and then as circumstances demanded grafted on a military identity, to become an Order of knighthood. The Grand Priory of the Order moved to Rhodes in 1312, where it ruled as a sovereign power, then to Malta in 1530 as a sovereign/vassal power.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Catherine: the Great Journey
    CATHERINE: THE GREAT JOURNEY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kristiana Gregory | 169 pages | 01 Apr 2006 | Scholastic US | 9780439253857 | English | New York, United States Catherine: The Great Journey PDF Book This is the story of one truly ambitious girl. Although she could see the benefits of Britain's friendship, she was wary of Britain's increased power following its victory in the Seven Years' War, which threatened the European balance of power. Heidi — Jul 18, The object was to strengthen the friendship between Prussia and Russia, to weaken the influence of Austria and to ruin the chancellor Aleksey Petrovich Bestuzhev-Ryumin , on whom Russian Empress Elizabeth relied, and who was a known partisan of the Austrian alliance. Still, there was a start of industry, mainly textiles around Moscow and ironworks in the Ural Mountains, with a labor force mainly of serfs, bound to the works. Readers who like diaries, royalty or history might enjoy this. Notify me of new comments via email. The life of a serf belonged to the state. Jun 11, Amanda Yeargin added it Shelves: 7th-grade-ir-books-stacy. And while possibly being involved in his death. Gregory achieves a realistic, rich atmosphere with insightful details about the immigration process and New York tenements in the early s. She had no intention of marrying him, having already given birth to Orlov's child and to the Grand Duke Paul by then. Russia invaded Poland on 26 August , threatening to fight, and imposing Poniatowski as king. Also could have been an interesting tack: would this drive a wedge between him and the empress? This book caught my eye when I visited the library yesterday.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Empress-Navigator
    Russia’s Empress-Navigator: Transforming Modes of Monarchy During the Reign of Anna Ivanovna, 1730-1740 Jacob Bell University of Illinois 2019 Winner of the James Madison Award for Excellence in Historical Scholarship The eighteenth century was a markedly volatile period in the history of Russia, seeing its development and international emergence as a European-styled empire. In narratives of this time of change, historians tend to view the century in two parts: the reign of Peter I (r. 1682-1725), who purportedly spurred Russia into modernization, and Catherine II (r. 1762-96), the German princess-turned-empress who presided over the culmination of Russia’s transformation. Yet, dismissal of nearly forty years of Russia’s history does a severe disservice to the sovereigns and governments that formed the process of change. Recently, Catherine Evtuhov turned her attention to investigating Russia under the rule of Elizabeth Petrovna (r. 1741-62), bolstering the conversation with a greater perspective of one of these “forgotten reigns,” but Elizabeth owed much to her post-Petrine predecessors. Specifically, Empress Anna Ivanovna (r. 1730-40) remains one of the most overlooked and underappreciated sovereigns of the interim between the “Greats.”1 Anna Ivanovna was born on February 7, 1693, the daughter of Praskovia Saltykova and Ivan V Alekseyvich (r. 1682-96), the son of Tsar Aleksey Mikhailovich (r. 1645-1676). When Anna was 1 Anna’s patronymic is also transliterated as Anna Ioannovna. I elected to use “Ivanovna” to closer resemble modern Russian. Lindsey Hughes, Russia in the Age of Peter the Great (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998); Catherine Evtuhov’s upcoming book is Russia in the Age of Elizabeth (1741-61).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Education of Women. Denis Diderot's Anatomy Course Project For
    Maciej Forycki Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Instytut Historii A new education of women. Denis Diderot’s anatomy course project for young noble women Abstract. A new education of women. Denis Diderot’s anatomy course project for young noble women Denis Diderot (1713–1784) explained how women’s education should be different than before. A woman should be considered a citizen, Diderot demanded placing primary social importance on her domestic activity. An interesting feature of this new approach to education of women was to include an anatomy course in their personal development. Denis Diderot did not devote a separate tractate to the issue of women’s education, nor did he write a concise curriculum in anatomy. However, the remarks scattered among various texts by the philosopher concerning that innovative concept allow us not only to reconstruct a fairly cohesive draft of an anatomy course for girls, but also superbly illustrate Diderot’s commitment to realization of his own ideas. Secondly, we need to consider the activities of one Ms. Biheron – the organizer of public anatomy courses – which exerted, as we will see, a huge influence on Diderot’s conviction of the need to incorporate such courses in women’s education. In the last part of the discourse, the involvement of the French philosopher in the educational reforms of Catherine II should be noted. The analysis of Diderot’s texts on education clearly indicates that the philosopher put a strong emphasis on changes in the methods of teaching women. As the director of St. Petersburg facility for girls he managed to partially put his project into effect.
    [Show full text]
  • 132 March 2019
    Romanov News Новости Романовых By Ludmila & Paul Kulikovsky №132 March 2019 The monument to the Royal Martyrs at the St. Seraphim Cathedral in Vyatka "For the first time in 100 years, a descendant of the Romanovs appeared in Vyatka" From 17 to 20 of March the great-great-grandson of Alexander III, the great-grandson of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna - the sister of Emperor Nicholas II - Paul E. Kulikovsky and his wife Ludmila visited Vyatka. They were invited by the regional public organization "Revival of Vyatka". Paul E. Kulikovsky - "Kirov, or Vyatka as we prefer to call the city, was one of the places on our "to-visit-list", as we want to visit all the places in Russia directly related to the Romanovs, and especially those in which the Romanovs were in exile after the revolution. That is why first of all were visited Romanov related locations and city landmarks. But for the local citizens the main event was a presentation of the book of memoirs of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna “25 Chapters of my life”, followed by a press- conference. City history The city is actually called Kirov - in honour of one of the Stalin co- workers – Sergei Kirov killed in 1934 – but many citizens still use the historical name Vyatka. It was established in 1174. From 1457 to 1780 it was called Khlynov, from 1780 to 1934 Vyatka, and now Kirov. It is the administrative centre of the Kirov region and located on the Vyatka River, 896 km northeast of Moscow. Population is about 507,155 (2018).
    [Show full text]