Not for Publication United
Case 2:95-cv-03794-DRD-MCA Document 236 Filed 09/10/07 Page 1 of 38 PageID: <pageID> NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ____________________________________ : Larry Marshak, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil Action No.: 95-3794 (DRD) v. : : OPINION Faye Treadwell, Treadwell’s Drifters, Inc., : and The Drifters, Inc., : : Defendants. : ____________________________________: Appearances by: Jeffrey Schreiber, Esq. Meister, Seelig & Fein, LLP 2G Auer Court Williamsburg Commons East Brunswick, NJ 08816 Attorney for Motion Respondents, Larry Marshak, Jody Marshak, Paula Marshak, Andrea Marshak, DCPM, Inc., Cal-Cap Ltd., Barry Singer, Singer Management Consultants, Inc., and Charles Mehlich. William L. Charron, Esq. Mona Simonian, Esq. Pryor Cashman LLP 410 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Motion Respondents, Larry Marshak, Jody Marshak, Paula Marshak, Andrea Marshak, DCPM, Inc., Cal-Cap Ltd., Barry Singer, Singer Management Consultants, Inc., and Charles Mehlich. Lowell B. Davis, Esq. One Old Country Road Carle Place, NY 11514 Pro Se Motion Respondent Case 2:95-cv-03794-DRD-MCA Document 236 Filed 09/10/07 Page 2 of 38 PageID: <pageID> Cindy Salvo, Esq. The Salvo Law Firm 101 Eisenhower Parkway Suite 300 Roseland, NJ 07068 Attorney for Petitioners Faye Treadwell, Treadwell’s Drifters, Inc. and The Drifters, Inc. DEBEVOISE, United States Senior District Judge Petitioners, Faye Treadwell, Treadwell’s Drifters, Inc., and The Drifters, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Treadwell”), move to have Motion Respondent, Larry Marshak (“Marshak”), held in contempt for violating the order of Judge Nicholas H. Politan, dated August 16, 1999, which permanently enjoined Marshak’s use of the name, “The Drifters,” or any other name that would be confusingly similar to “The Drifters,” in the “occurrence, sale, promotion, or advertising of live or recorded musical performances.” Judge Politan’s order, upon appeal by Marshak, was affirmed by Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on February 9, 2001.
[Show full text]