DOCSLIB.ORG

From Versailles to Locarno

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Anna M. Cienciala and Titus Komarnicki FROM VERSAILLES TO LOCARNO Keys to Polish Foreign Policy 1919-1925 * ISBN 0-7006-0247-X Anna M. Cienciala was born in Poland and spent the first ten years of her life there. She witnessed the Polish-German war of 1939, the German invasion of France in 1940, the Battle of Britain, and the German V-l and V-2 raids on Great Britain in 1944. She studied at the University of Liverpool, McGill University, Columbia University's Russian Institute, and Indiana University. She is the author of Poland and the Western Powers, 1938-1939: A Study in the Interdependence of Eastern and Western Europe, as well as numerous articles on European diplomatic history in U.S. and Polish scholarly journals. She has taught at the University of Toronto and the University of Ottawa, and is now professor of history and Soviet and East European Studies at the University of Kansas. Titus Komarnicki (1896-1967), author of Rebirth of the Polish Republic: A Study in the Diplomatic History of Europe, 1914-1920 and editor of three of the four volumes of the papers of Jan Szembek, was* born and educated in Poland. He took an active part in the war for Poland's independence, and was awarded the Cross of Valor and the Independence Cross. He entered the Polish Diplomatic Service in 1917, attended the Locarno Conference in 1925 as Secretary General of the Polish Delegation, and in 1934 was appointed Permanent Delegate to the League of Nations. He was Minister to Switzerland (1938-1940), underground repre• sentative of the Polish government in unoccupied France (1942-1943), Minister to the Dutch Government in London, and, later, Professor of International Law at the Polish School of Political and Social Science in London. Publication made possible by grants from the de Brzezie Lanckoronski Foundation, the Joseph B. Slotkowski Publications Fund of the Kosciuszko Foundation, and the Scholarly Publications Fund of the University of Kansas. FROM VERSAILLES TO LOCARNO Map 1. Polish Population and Boundaries FROM VERSAILLES TO LOCARNO KEYS TO POLISH FOREIGN POLICY, 1919-25 Anna M. Cienciala and Titus Komarnicki UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KANSAS ©1984 by the University Press of Kansas All rights reserved Published by the University Press of Kansas (Lawrence, Kansas 66045), which was organized by the Kansas Board of Regents and is operated and funded by Emporia State University, Fort Hays State University, Kansas State University, Pittsburg State University, the University of Kansas, and Wichita State University Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cienciala, Anna M. From Versailles to Locarno. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Poland—Foreign relations—1918-1945. I. Komarnicki, Titus. II. Title. DK4403.5.C54 1984 327.438 84-2302 ISBN 0-7006-0247-X Printed in the United States of America IN MEMORY OF TITUS KOMARNICKI Polish Diplomat and Historian (1896-1967) Generous support for the publication oj this book is gratefully acknowledged from The de Brzezie Lanckoronski Foundation, Friburg, Switzerland The Scholarly Publications Revolving Fund of the University of Kansas, Lawrence The Joseph B. Slotkowski Publication Fund of the Kosciuszko Foundation, New York Contents List of Maps Preface List of Abbreviations Introduction 1 The Franco-Polish Alliance and Poland in Franco-British Relations, 1920-22 2 The Struggle for Upper Silesia: The Background and Developments from 1919 to the Plebiscite of 20 March 1921 3 The Struggle for Upper Silesia: Interpreting the Plebiscite, 20 March to 10 October 1921 4 The Free City of Danzig: An Unworkable Compromise, 1919-25 5 The Polish-Lithuanian Dispute over Vilna, 1918-22 6 East Galicia and the Question of Poland's Eastern Frontier, November 1918 to December 1921 vii 7 East Galicia and Poland's Eastern Frontier: The Genoa Conference, January-June 1922 183 8 East Galicia, Vilna, Memel, and the Recognition of Poland's Eastern Frontier, June 1922 to March 1923 199 9 Toward Locarno: Poland, the Western Powers, and Germany, January 1924 to September 1925 223 10 Poland at Locarno 255 11 Concluding Thoughts 277 Notes 281 Bibliography 347 Index 365 viii List of Maps 1 Polish Population and Boundaries Frontispiece This map is based on these sources: (1) Western and Central Poland—after "Polish Territories under Prussian Domination: The Nationality of the Children in Primary Schools, according to the Official Figures of the Prussian Government, 1911," in Robert Machray, The Polish-German Problem (London, 1941), reprinted in G. R. Gey re, Teuton & Slav on the Polish Frontier (London, 1944), map 5; (2) Eastern Poland, proposed Polish boundaries in the East, Curzon Line, frontier established in 1921—from "Pologne, Fron• tiers Orientales," Carte ethnographique de la Pologne, map enclosed with the Polish Delegation's note of 3 March 1919 to the Peace Conference, Paris, in Casimir Smogorzewski, La Pologne restauree (Paris, 1927), p. 154; (3) proposed Polish boundaries in the West—after "The Polish-German Frontier," in Titus Komarnicki, The Rebirth of the Polish Republic (Melbourne, London, Toronto, 1957), facing p. 315. 2 The German-Polish Frontier This map is based on these sources: (1) Polish majority—after "Polish Territories under Prussian Domination" (see map 1); (2) plebiscite areas and boundary proposed by Poland—after T. Komarnicki, "The Polish-German Frontier" (see map 1); (3) the Quai d'Orsay, Anglo-American, and Foreign Office lines—after "German-Polish Borderlands," in Harold I. Nelson, Land and Power: British and Allied Policy on Germany's Frontiers, 1916-1919 (London, Toronto, 1963), map 2, p. 195. 3 Results of the Upper Silesian Plebiscite, March 1921 This map is based on these sources: (1) Korfanty Line and International Boundary, 1921—from "The Plebiscite Area of ix Upper Silesia," in Robert Machray, The Problem of Upper Silesia (London, 1945), map 9; (2) all other data—from "Upper Silesia: Results of the Plebiscite Shown by Districts (Kreise); Maps by the British Section, Interallied Administrative and Plebiscite Commis• sion, Upper Silesia," in Sarah Wambaugh, Plebiscites since the World War (Washington, D.C., 1933), vol. 1, facing p. 267. 4 Polish-Lithuanian Demarcation Lines, 1919/20 115 This map is based on "Polsko-Litewskie linie demarkacyjne (1919- 1920)," in Piotr Lossowski, Stosunki polsko-litewskie w latach 1919- 1920 (Warsaw, 1966), end map. 5 Eastern Poland 185 This map is based on these sources: (1) Polish Majority—from "Pologne, Frontieres Orientales" (see map 1); (2) Curzon Line, lines A, B—from "Galicie Orientale," printed in Documents on British Foreign Policy, 1st ser., vol. 3 (London, 1949), facing p. 840; (3) all other linear data—from "The Riga Settlement," in Norman Davies, White Eagle, Red Star: The Polish-Soviet War, 1919-20 (Lon• don, 1972), endpiece. x Preface The inspiration for this book stemmed from an unpublished manuscript by Dr. Titus Komarnicki, author of a well-known study of the rebirth of Poland, in the years 1914 to 1920,1 and editor of three of the four volumes of the papers of Jan Szembek, Polish undersecretary of state for foreign affairs from 1932 to 1939.2 The manuscript continued the story of Polish foreign policy to March 1923. After Dr. Komarnicki's death in 1967, his family asked me to prepare the work for publication. I accepted this task willingly, both because I owed him a debt of gratitude for advice and assistance in my doctoral research and because I believed, as he did, that an English-language study of key Polish foreign-policy problems in the early nineteen twenties would be useful to Western historians. The increasing availability of new sources after 1967 compelled me to devote more time to the project than I had planned, while my own interests led me to change the structure of the manuscript and to extend the period covered. Thus, I have written a new Introduction and omitted seven of the original eleven chapters, while using some of the material for new ones. Also, I have added two new chapters on the period 1924/25, because the Locarno Treaties were a more important turning point for both Poland and Europe than was Allied recognition of Poland's eastern frontier in March 1923. I would like to stress that I share most of Dr. Komarnicki's views on the nature of the problems that Poland faced in her foreign policy from 1919 to 1925. I wish to express my gratitude to the Komarnicki family for their patience, and I hope that the end result will bear out the adage "Nothing good happens fast"—which applies equally to good history and good wine. It is my hope that this book will help Western historians understand the key problems of Polish foreign policy and its objectives at this time. I trust that XI it will enable them to view Western and Eastern Europe as an interdependent whole. I wish to thank all those who, either through their published work or personally, have helped me write this book. I must first acknowledge my debt to Polish historians both in Poland and abroad. I was fortunate enough to receive my training as a diplomatic historian from Professor Piotr S. Wandycz, formerly of Indiana University, now at Yale. His meticulous scholarship has always been a model for me—though, of course, I am responsible for any errors of fact and for the opinions expressed in this book. Furthermore, without his brilliant study of Soviet-Polish relations from 1917 to 1921 and his pioneering work on France's relations with Poland and Czechoslovakia from 1919 to 1925 this book would not have been possible.3 I am greatly indebted to Professor Piotr Lossowski's excellent study of Polish- Lithuanian relations from 1918 to 1920;4 to Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Die Fritsch-Krise Im Frühjahr 1938. Neun Dokumente Aus Dem Nachlaß Des Generalobersten

    Die Fritsch-Krise Im Frühjahr 1938. Neun Dokumente Aus Dem Nachlaß Des Generalobersten

    Dokumentation Horst Mühleisen Die Fritsch-Krise im Frühjahr 1938. Neun Dokumente aus dem Nachlaß des Generalobersten I. Die Bedeutung der Dokumente Es gibt Skandale, die lange fortwirken und auch die Forschung immer noch be- schäftigen. Zu diesen gehört jener, der mit dem Namen des Generalfeldmarschalls Werner von Blomberg, des Reichskriegsministers und Oberbefehlshabers der Wehr- macht, sowie des Generalobersten Werner Freiherrn von Fritsch, des Oberbefehls- habers des Heeres, verbunden ist. Der Anlaß für Blombergs Entlassung am 4. Februar 1938 war seine Heirat mit einer Frau, deren Vorleben als kompromittiert galt. Fritsch aber war der Homose- xualität, des Vergehens nach § 175 Strafgesetzbuch, beschuldigt worden. Auch er erhielt am selben Tage, dem 4. Februar, seinen Abschied. Um die gegen Fritsch er- hobenen Vorwürfe aufzuklären, ermittelte sowohl die Geheime Staatspolizei als auch das Reichskriegsgericht. Dies waren die Tatsachen, die im Frühjahr 1938 indessen nur wenigen Perso- nen verlaßlich bekannt waren. Der Öffentlichkeit war mitgeteilt worden, die Ver- abschiedung von Blomberg und Fritsch sei aus gesundheitlichen Gründen erfolgt. Wenige Jahre nach Kriegsende, 1949, veröffentlichte Johann Adolf Graf Kiel- mansegg, Fritschs Neffe, eine Darstellung über den Prozeß des Reichskriegsge- richts gegen den Generalobersten1. Die persönlichen Zeugnisse, die der ehemali- ge Oberbefehlshaber des Heeres hinterlassen hat, waren indessen spärlich, da Fritsch keine umfangreiche Korrespondenz führte. Ferner standen Kielmansegg die Prozeßakten nicht zur Verfügung, da sie verbrannt waren. Fotokopien der Ak- ten und Verhandlungsstenogramme, die in nicht sehr zahlreicher Ausfertigung vorlagen, ebenso wie die Handakten des Verteidigers, des Grafen Rüdiger von der Goltz, wurden durch Bombenangriffe vernichtet2. Ob die Protokolle, die Reichs- kriegsgerichtsrat Dr. Karl Sack während des Prozesses führte, tatsächlich nach Kriegsende in die Hände der amerikanischen Besatzungsmacht gefallen sind3, ist ungewiß; bis heute sind sie nicht wieder aufgetaucht.
  • Nazi Germany and the Jews Ch 3.Pdf

    Nazi Germany and the Jews Ch 3.Pdf

    AND THE o/ w VOLUME I The Years of Persecution, i933~i939 SAUL FRIEDLANDER HarperCollinsPííMí^ers 72 • THE YEARS OF PERSECUTION, 1933-1939 dependent upon a specific initial conception and a visible direction. Such a CHAPTER 3 conception can be right or wrong; it is the starting point for the attitude to be taken toward all manifestations and occurrences of life and thereby a compelling and obligatory rule for all action."'^'In other words a worldview as defined by Hitler was a quasi-religious framework encompassing imme­ Redemptive Anti-Semitism diate political goals. Nazism was no mere ideological discourse; it was a political religion commanding the total commitment owed to a religious faith."® The "visible direction" of a worldview implied the existence of "final goals" that, their general and hazy formulation notwithstanding, were sup­ posed to guide the elaboration and implementation of short-term plans. Before the fall of 1935 Hitler did not hint either in public or in private I what the final goal of his anti-Jewish policy might be. But much earlier, as On the afternoon of November 9,1918, Albert Ballin, the Jewish owner of a fledgling political agitator, he had defined the goal of a systematic anti- the Hamburg-Amerika shipping line, took his life. Germany had lost the Jewish policy in his notorious first pohtical text, the letter on the "Jewish war, and the Kaiser, who had befriended him and valued his advice, had question" addressed on September 16,1919, to one Adolf Gemlich. In the been compelled to abdicate and flee to Holland, while in Berlin a republic short term the Jews had to be deprived of their civil rights: "The final aim was proclaimed.
  • Generate PDF of This Page

    Generate PDF of This Page

    Institute of National Remembrance https://ipn.gov.pl/en/news/4412,It-was-good-to-fight-for-Poland.html 2021-09-25, 16:52 12.08.2020 “It was good to fight for Poland!” We encourage you to read an article written by President of the IPN Jarosław Szarek, Ph.D. for the "Rzeczpospolita" newspaper. “We have the whole world against us” wrote Stanisław Posner in a report for Józef Piłsudski, submitted end of June 1920, after travelling through Western European countries. During his several-week expedition, he visited a few capital cities and returned with observations free of any hope, on the day preceding the breakout of decisive battles in the east. Posner highlighted that even those who had been siding with Poland, such as French President Alexandre Millerand, assuring of his support for Warsaw in the conflict with the Czechs ,“is siding with them and, in other matters, will always submit to the opinion of England, because he depends on her as a creditor. What can I say about the others? The issue of compensation, the issue of Gdańsk, the issue of the plebiscites – are worse than ever.” The following weeks confirmed these observations. Even among recent sympathisers of Poland’s cause there was no shortage of those observing with indifference our battle with Bolshevism, interested, at most, in taking as much as they could for themselves. The year 1920 did not just mean the struggle with Bolshevism, but also a clash with the indifference and reluctance from the West. Hence the assistance we received from those willing to help us at this dramatic time was even more valuable.
  • Soviet Instigation of Revolution in Germany in 1923 and the Block of Peace of the Baltic Countries and Poland

    Soviet Instigation of Revolution in Germany in 1923 and the Block of Peace of the Baltic Countries and Poland

    EUROPA ORIENTALIS 10 (2019) Studia z Dziejów Europy Wschodniej i Państw Bałtyckich ISSN 2081-8742 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EO.2019.004 Zenonas Butkus Soviet Instigation of Revolution (Vilnius university – Vilnius, lietuva) in Germany in 1923 and the Block of Peace of the Baltic Countries and Poland Słowa kluczowe: bolszewicy; eksport rewolucji; robotniczo-chłopska armia czerwona; dyplomacja; niemcy; państwa bałtyckie; Polska Keywords: Bolsheviks; export of revolution; Workers’ and Peasants’ Red Army; diplomacy; germany; Baltic countries; Poland Introduction he widespread stereotype that, purportedly, the countries of central Tand eastern europe, re-established or newly-established after the First World War, did not intensify security and stability because they were in- volved in strong mutual confl icts and to some extent that was why the new war struck each and all, is still sticking out. george david lloyd, the architect of the Versailles system, was of the following opinion: “The resurrected nations rose from their graves hungry and ravening from their long fast in the vaults of oppression, […] they clutched at anything that lay within reach of their hands – not even waiting to throw off the cerements of the grave”.1 He also added that the new nations turned into “even larger 1 g. d. lloyd, The Truth About the Peace Treaties, Vol. 1, london 1938, p. 314. 86 Zenonas Butkus imperialists than england or France, larger even than the united States”.2 The circulation of this version was triggered by the Polish-lithuanian con- flict that hindered formation of an effective union of the Baltic countries.3 despite this conflict and its international consequences, Poland and its northern neighbours – lithuania, latvia, and estonia – contributed con- siderably to the preservation of peace and stability in inter-war europe.
  • Poland – Germany – History

    Poland – Germany – History

    Poland – Germany – History Issue: 18 /2020 26’02’21 The Polish-French Alliance of 1921 By Prof. dr hab. Stanisław Żerko Concluded in February 1921, Poland’s alliance treaty with France, which was intended to afford the former an additional level of protection against German aggression, was the centerpiece of Poland’s foreign policy during the Interwar Period. However, from Poland’s viewpoint, the alliance had all along been fraught with significant shortcomings. With the passage of time, it lost some of its significance as Paris increasingly disregarded Warsaw’s interests. This trend was epitomized by the Locarno conference of 1925, which marked the beginning of the Franco-German rapprochement. By 1933-1934, Poland began to revise its foreign policy with an eye to turning the alliance into a partnership. This effort turned out to be unsuccessful. It was not until the diplomatic crisis of 1939 that the treaty was strengthened and complemented with an Anglo-Polish alliance, which nevertheless failed to avert the German attack on Poland. Despite both France and Great Britain having declared war against the Reich on September 3, 1939, neither provided their Polish ally with due assistance. However, French support was the main factor for an outcome that was generally favorable to Poland, which was to redraw its border with Germany during the Paris peace conference in 1919. It seems that the terms imposed on the Reich in the Treaty of Versailles were all that Poland could ever have hoped to achieve given the balance of power at the time. One should bear in mind that France made a significant contribution to organizing and arming the Polish Army, especially when the Republic of Poland came under threat from Soviet Russia in the summer of 1920.
  • German Politics and the 'Jewish Question', 1914-1919

    German Politics and the 'Jewish Question', 1914-1919

    German Politics and the 'Jewish Question', 1914-1919 Lucia Juliette Linares Darwin College Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2019 PREFACE I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any other work that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other university or similar institution except as declared in the preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other university or similar institution except as declared in the preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the Faculty of History. All translations are my own unless specified in the text. i ABSTRACT German Politics and the 'Jewish Question', 1914-1919 Lucia Juliette Linares The First World War confronted German politicians with a range of unprecedented, vital questions in the spheres of domestic as well as foreign policy. As the fortunes of war shifted, so did borders, populations and national allegiances. In a period of acute and almost constant political crisis, the German government faced issues concerning citizenship, minority rights, religious identity, nationhood and statehood. My dissertation analyses these issues through the prism of the so-called 'Jewish Question'.
  • Karl Barth's Contribution to the German Church Struggle Against National

    Karl Barth's Contribution to the German Church Struggle Against National

    Karl Barth’s contribution to the German Church struggle against National Socialism Ramathate Dolamo Department of Philosophy and Systematic Theology, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa Abstract Germany was under a totalitarian regime led by Adolf Hitler from 1933 to 1945. This article looks at the responses of the churches in Germany during that period. In particular, Karl Barth’s theology on church and state is examined to determine to what extent it did assist Germany in fighting National Socialism and in rebuilding Germany after the war. The author is of the view that most of Barth’s insights could be relevant and would be applicable today especially in those countries that are still being ruled by autocrats and dictators. Introduction Not only do theologians differ as to whether the (divine) com- mand should be grounded in the Christology or in the “orders of creation”, but also some theologians appear unwilling to recognise that the command is the ground and the instrument of God’s creative will of love both in originating and in sustaining creation in its historical development (Maimela 1984:158). Karl Barth’s views on sociopolitical matters especially those on church and state relations that he started to formulate during his Safenwil pastorate in 1911 were put to the harshest and rigorous test during the reign of Adolf Hitler from 1933 to the end of World War II in 1945. This article is an appre- ciation of the insights of Barth as a theologian and as an activist during the church struggle in Germany against National Socialism.
  • Abstammungslinien-Entwurf Zur Grafik 3

    Abstammungslinien-Entwurf Zur Grafik 3

    Abstammungslinien-Entwurf zur Grafik 3: Stand: 5. Juni 2010 Zusammenstellung: Arndt Richter, München am 23.12.2016 ergänzt von Wolfgang Bernhardt, Hoyerswerda Diese Zusammenstellung soll linienmäßig noch erweitert werden. Ergänzungswünsche erbeten an: [email protected] Quellen: AL Anna von Mohl, (Arndt Richter, handschriftlich) AL Kinder Rösch, (Siegfried Rösch, handschriftlich) AL Max Planck (Arndt Richter, WORD-AL) AL v.Weizsäcker-v.Graevenitz, Berlin 1992 ( F. W. Euler) AL Wilhelm Hauff: AT berühmter Deutscher, Bd. 2. und Ergäzung Bd. 4. Zu Seite 46 f.: Deutsches Familienarchiv (DFA) Bd. 58, 1973 (Gmelin-Stammliste!): Zu Seite 56 f.: F. W. Euler: „Alfred v. Tirpitz und seine Ahnen“; in: AfS (1989), 55. Jg., H. 114, S. 81-100). Zu Seite 57 f: Gero v.Wilcke: Caroline Böhmer und ihre Tochter – Zur Genealogie von Schellings erster Frau; in: AfS (1975), H.57, S.39-50; und Friedrich v. Klocke: Familie und Volk (1955, S. 169). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstammungslinien A (zur Grafik 3) (AvM 10170/1) Aus der AL Anna von Mohl (Zusammenstellung Arndt Richter, München) entnommen: Die Ahnen-Nrn. beziehen sich hier daher auf die AL Anna von Mohl als Probanden. Quelle zur Dynastenabstammung: Deutsches Geschlechterbuch (DGB) Bd. 170 = Schwäbisches Geschlechterbuch, 9. Band, zur Famlie Dreher, Anhang B (AL Dreher/Volland), bearbeitet von D. Dr. Otto Beuttenmüller). 20342 v. Wirtemberg (Württemberg), Graf Eberhard V., „der Junge“, * 23.8.1388, + Waiblingen 2.7.1419, □ Stuttgart; o-o (uneheliche Verbindung) 20343 v. Dagersheim, Agnes, * (Stuttgart) um 1399, das „v.“ ist Herkunftsbezeichnung, die bereits bei Ihrem Vater üblich war; ihre Eltern waren Werner v. Dagersheim, Ratsherr zu Stuttgart 1402/31, und Katharina Machtolf (war seine 2.
  • "Weapon of Starvation": the Politics, Propaganda, and Morality of Britain's Hunger Blockade of Germany, 1914-1919

    "Weapon of Starvation": the Politics, Propaganda, and Morality of Britain's Hunger Blockade of Germany, 1914-1919

    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) 2015 A "Weapon of Starvation": The Politics, Propaganda, and Morality of Britain's Hunger Blockade of Germany, 1914-1919 Alyssa Cundy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Cundy, Alyssa, "A "Weapon of Starvation": The Politics, Propaganda, and Morality of Britain's Hunger Blockade of Germany, 1914-1919" (2015). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1763. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1763 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A “WEAPON OF STARVATION”: THE POLITICS, PROPAGANDA, AND MORALITY OF BRITAIN’S HUNGER BLOCKADE OF GERMANY, 1914-1919 By Alyssa Nicole Cundy Bachelor of Arts (Honours), University of Western Ontario, 2007 Master of Arts, University of Western Ontario, 2008 DISSERTATION Submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Doctor of Philosophy in History Wilfrid Laurier University 2015 Alyssa N. Cundy © 2015 Abstract This dissertation examines the British naval blockade imposed on Imperial Germany between the outbreak of war in August 1914 and the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles in July 1919. The blockade has received modest attention in the historiography of the First World War, despite the assertion in the British official history that extreme privation and hunger resulted in more than 750,000 German civilian deaths.
  • University of Bradford Ethesis

    University of Bradford Ethesis

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bradford Scholars University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. THE WHITE INTERNATIONAL: ANATOMY OF A TRANSNATIONAL RADICAL REVISIONIST PLOT IN CENTRAL EUROPE AFTER WORLD WAR I Nicholas Alforde Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and International Studies University of Bradford 2013 Principal Supervisor: Gábor Bátonyi, DPhil Abstract Nicholas Alforde The White International: Anatomy of a Transnational Radical Revisionist Plot in Central Europe after World War I Keywords: Bauer, Gömbös, Horthy, Ludendorff, Orgesch, paramilitary, Prónay, revision, Versailles, von Kahr The denial of defeat, the harsh Versailles Treaty and unsuccessful attempts by paramilitary units to recover losses in the Baltic produced in post-war Germany an anti- Bolshevik, anti-Entente, radical right-wing cabal of officers with General Ludendorff and Colonel Bauer at its core. Mistakenly citing a lack of breadth as one of the reason for the failure of their amateurishly executed Hohenzollern restoration and Kapp Putsch schemes, Bauer and co-conspirator Ignatius Trebitsch-Lincoln devised the highly ambitious White International plot. It sought to form a transnational league of Bavaria, Austria and Hungary to force the annulment of the Paris Treaties by the coordinated use of paramilitary units from the war vanquished nations. It set as its goals the destruction of Bolshevism in all its guises throughout Europe, the restoration of the monarchy in Russia, the systematic elimination of all Entente-sponsored Successor States and the declaration of war on the Entente.
  • Power Distribution in the Weimar Reichstag in 1919-1933

    Power Distribution in the Weimar Reichstag in 1919-1933

    Power Distribution in the Weimar Reichstag in 1919-1933 Fuad Aleskerov1, Manfred J. Holler2 and Rita Kamalova3 Abstract: ................................................................................................................................................2 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................2 2. The Weimar Germany 1919-1933: A brief history of socio-economic performance .......................3 3. Political system..................................................................................................................................4 3.2 Electoral system for the Reichstag ..................................................................................................6 3.3 Political parties ................................................................................................................................6 3.3.1 The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD).....................................................................7 3.3.2 The Communist Party of Germany (Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands – KPD)...............8 3.3.3 The German Democratic Party (Deutsche Demokratische Partei – DDP)...............................9 3.3.4 The Centre Party (Deutsche Zentrumspartei – Zentrum) .......................................................10 3.3.5 The German People's Party (Deutsche Volkspartei – DVP) ..................................................10 3.3.6 German-National People's Party (Deutsche
  • Tylosaurus Kansasensis, a New Species of Tylosaurine (Squamata, Mosasauridae) from the Niobrara Chalk of Western Kansas, USA

    Tylosaurus Kansasensis, a New Species of Tylosaurine (Squamata, Mosasauridae) from the Niobrara Chalk of Western Kansas, USA

    Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Sternberg Museum of Natural History Faculty Publications Sternberg Museum of Natural History 1-1-2005 Tylosaurus kansasensis, a new species of tylosaurine (Squamata, Mosasauridae) from the Niobrara Chalk of western Kansas, USA M. J. Everhart Fort Hays State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/sternberg_facpubs Part of the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Everhart, M. (2005). Tylosaurus kansasensis, a new species of tylosaurine (Squamata, Mosasauridae) from the Niobrara Chalk of western Kansas, USA. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 84(3), 231-240. doi:10.1017/S0016774600021016 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sternberg Museum of Natural History at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sternberg Museum of Natural History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw | 84 - 3 | 231 - 240 | 2005 Tylosaurus kansasensis, a new species of tylosaurine (Squamata, Mosasauridae) from the Niobrara Chalk of western Kansas, USA M.J. Everhart | Sternberg Museum of Natural History, Fort Hays State University, Hays, Kansas 67601, USA. Email: [email protected] Manuscript received: December 2004; accepted: January 2005 Abstract | Tylosaurus kansasensis sp. nov. is described herein on the basis of thirteen specimens collected from the Smoky Hill Chalk (upper Coniacian) of western Kansas, USA. The new species, originally designated Tylosaurus n. sp., co-occurred with T. nepaeohcus and exhibits a number of primitive characters that place it in a basal position in the mosasaur phylogeny. Among the key differences separating this species from other tylosaurines are a shortened, more rounded pre-dental process of the premaxilla, a distinctive quadrate lacking an infrastapedial process, and a parietal foramen located adjacent to the frontal-parietal suture.