DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Superior Court of Butts County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Superior Court of Butts County No. 18-_______ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term, 2018 _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ MARION WILSON, JR., Petitioner, -v- BENJAMIN FORD, Warden, Respondent. THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE GEORGIA SUPREME COURT __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Marcia A. Widder (Ga. 643407) GEORGIA RESOURCE CENTER 303 Elizabeth Street, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30307 (404) 222-9202 Brian S. Kammer (Ga. 406322) 241 E Lake Drive Decatur, Georgia 30030 (678) 235-4964 COUNSEL FOR MR. WILSON QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE 1) Are due process and the Eighth Amendment violated when a prosecutor knowingly argues falsehoods about the defendant’s culpable acts in order to incite the jury to impose the death penalty? 2) Can the State of Georgia be permitted to execute a defendant where it lacked probative evidence that he killed, intended to kill, or engaged in conduct leading up to the murder that reflected reckless indifference, and where evidence obtained post-conviction demonstrates that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct in order to secure the death penalty? i TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW..................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................................... iii OPINIONS BELOW ....................................................................................................................... 1 JURISDICTION ............................................................................................................................. 2 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS INVOLVED ........................................................................ 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ....................................................................................................... 2 A. Relevant Facts ................................................................................................................ 2 B. Proceedings Below ......................................................................................................... 9 REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION .......................................................................... 11 I. The Prosecutor’s Knowingly False and/or Misleading Argument to the Jury Rendered Mr. Wilson’s Sentencing Fundamentally Unfair and Unreliable in Violation of the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Analogous Provisions of the Georgia Constitution. ................................................................................................................. 11 II. Marion Wilson May Not Be Executed Because He Did Not Kill, Attempt to Kill, or Intend to Kill Donovan Parks, and His Involvement in the Events Leading Up to the Murder Was Not Active, Recklessly Indifferent, or Substantial. ................................................................................................................... 14 I. The Georgia Courts Should Not Be Permitted to Thwart Review of Mr. Wilson’s Constitutional Claims for Relief. .................................................................. 21 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 26 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Federal Cases Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) ........................................................................................ 15 Beard v. Kindler, 558 U.S. 53 (2009) ........................................................................................... 26 Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935) ................................................................................ 13 Bradshaw v. Stumpf, 545 U.S. 175 (2005) .................................................................................... 13 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) ................................................................................. 12, 13 Cabana v. Bullock, 474 U.S. 376 (1986) ................................................................................ 16, 18 Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977) ............................................................................ 15, 16, 18 Conner v. Hall, 645 F.3d 1277 (11th Cir. 2011)..................................................................... 21, 25 Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168 (1986) ................................................................................ 13 Davis v. Wechsler, 263 U.S. 22 (1923) ......................................................................................... 25 Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637 (1974) ......................................................................... 12 Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782 (1982) .............................................................................. passim Ford v. Georgia, 498 U.S. 411 (1991) .......................................................................................... 25 Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972) .................................................................................. 12, 14, 23 Green v. Georgia, 442 U.S. 95 (1979) .......................................................................................... 12 Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976) ....................................................................................... 12 James v. Kentucky, 466 U.S. 341 (1984) ...................................................................................... 25 Johnson v. Mississippi, 486 U.S. 578 (1988) ................................................................................ 12 Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008) ................................................................................. 16 Lee v. Kemna, 534 U.S. 362 (2002) .............................................................................................. 25 Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1 (1967) ............................................................................................ 13, 22 iii Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U.S. 103 (1935) .................................................................................... 12 Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 691 (1975) ............................................................................. 25 Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959) ....................................................................... 12, 14, 22, 23 Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) ................................................................................. 15, 16 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) ........................................................................... 10 Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (1987) ............................................................................. 16, 18, 19 Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958) ......................................................................................... 14, 20 Turner v. State, 267 Ga. 149 (1996) ............................................................................................... 4 U.S. v. Alzate, 47 F.3d 1103 (11th Cir. 1995) ............................................................................... 14 U.S. v. Bigeleisen, 625 F.2d 203 (8th Cir. 1980) .......................................................................... 14 Walker v. Martin, 562 U.S. 307 (2011) ........................................................................................ 26 Williams v. Georgia, 349 U.S. 375 (1955) ................................................................................... 26 Wilson v. Georgia, 531 U.S. 838 (2000)....................................................................................... 10 Wilson v. Humphrey, No. 5:10-CV-489, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178241 (M.D. Ga. Dec. 19, 2013) ................................................................................................................................................... 10 Wilson v. Sellers, 138 S. Ct. 1188 (2018) ..................................................................................... 11 Wilson v. Terry, 562 U.S. 1093 (2010) ......................................................................................... 10 Wilson v. Warden, 774 F.3d 671 (11th Cir. 2014) ........................................................................ 10 Wilson v. Warden, 834 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2016) ...................................................................... 11 Wilson v. Warden, 898 F.3d 1314, 1316 (11th Cir. 2018) ............................................................ 11 State Cases Alexander v. State, 270 Ga. 346 (1998) ........................................................................................ 22 Bruce v. Smith, 274 Ga. 432 (2001) .............................................................................................. 24 iv Butts v. Hall, Butts Co. Superior Court Case No. 2002-V-638 ............................................ 3, 9, 14 Butts v. State, 273 Ga. 760, 771 (2001) .................................................................................... 8, 13 Hammock v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "The Energy Crisis" Carroll County Times Article for 7 February 1999
    "The Energy Crisis" Carroll County Times Article for 7 February 1999 By Jay A. Graybeal I recently filled up my minivan with gasoline, a unremarkable event to say the least. Twenty-five years ago, however, I could not have have done so because the nation was in the painful throes of the "Energy Crisis". Nearly every week, the local press carried front page news stories about the crisis and there were frequent editorials about causes and solutions. My clearest memory of the crisis involved driving to Frederick, waiting an hour for 10 gallons of gas and feeling proud of my accomplishment. This newspaper carried two stories about the crisis in the February 14, 1974 issue of the paper under the headline of "Shortages Bring Hard Times To Station Owners". The first story, "Rival's Closing Brings Frowns" described the impending closing of the Gulf station in Manchester: "When Ken Gerst's Gulf station closes at the end of the month the competition at Manchester's two remaining service station's won't be smiling. "It's going to be terrible for the rest of us." said Mobil station operator Leon Miller. "We simply don't have enough gas to take care of his customers." Speaking about the problems he and BP station owner Donald Rhoten will encounter next month. Miller said, "We've got to come up with 5,000 gallons apiece and we haven't got it." "It's going to ruin me," Rhoten said of Gerst's closing. "What am I going to do? With half of my allotment I can't take care of his (customers) and mine both.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Assessment to Finish Next Week
    '-!•••• i; :v.; • mk '• - :~<4 • THE ONLY NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED IN THE TOWN OF ENFIELD, CONN. Fifty-Second Year—No. 39. THOMPSONVILLE, CONN., THURSDAY, JANUARY 14, 1932 Subscription $2.00 Per Year—Single Copy 5c. OBSERVES 80TH BIRTHDAY "THE COLLEGE FLAPPER" Mrs. Honore Chaine Honored by Rela­ FORMER LOCAL Will Be Presented By Legion Auxil­ tives At Party Saturday Night, iary On January 28 and 29. Property Assessment able social time was spent by MAN HONORED A unique birthday celebration took The American Legion Auxiliary has place last Saturday at the home of completed plans to present the play, Henry Croteau on Hartford Avenue, "The College Flapper" in the Enfield when the family of Mrs. Honore High School Auditorium, Thursday To Finish Next Week Chaine felicitated her on her 80th and Friday evenings, Jan. 28 and 29. anniversary. Four generations of the The cast, composed entirely of local Selectmen Have Designated Manner in Which family were represented by her seven people, will begin rehearsals next children, 19 grandchildren and twelve week. The committees in charge of Assessors Have Completed Task of Valuing the the Town Aid Appropriation Shall Be Spent great-grandchildren. The home was the affair are: Cast, Mrs. Florence appropriately decorated by flowers, Johnson, assisted by Mrs. JeWel Ep­ Taxable Property of the Town — A Few Days This Year, And Will Ask That Plan Be Approv­ the gift of her daughter, Mrs. F. stein, Miss Mae Davison, Mrs. Bern- Howard Stetson. Mrs. Chaine was ice Fancher, Mrs. Ann Moore and Will Be Required to Compute the Figures and ed At Special Meeting Of the Electors Later.
    [Show full text]
  • Taming Cerberus: the Beast at AEDPA’S Gates Patrick J
    Taming Cerberus: The Beast at AEDPA’s Gates Patrick J. Fuster† INTRODUCTION The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 19961 (AEDPA) established the current regime under which federal courts address petitions for a writ of habeas corpus by state prisoners. Riddled with ambiguities, AEDPA has frustrated judges and commentators alike.2 Because Congress either failed to conclusively resolve or—more likely—did not even consider the text’s application to a multitude of intricate scenarios, judges fall back on three considerations that animate federal habeas jurisprudence to construct the AEDPA regime: finality, comity, and federalism.3 Currently without limitations, this three- headed beast wreaks havoc, upending traditional methods of statutory interpretation and neutral decision-making.4 To resolve † BA 2014, University of California, Berkeley; JD Candidate 2018, The University of Chicago Law School. 1 Pub L No 104-132, 110 Stat 1214. 2 Justice David Souter famously remarked that “in a world of silk purses and pigs’ ears, the Act is not a silk purse of the art of statutory drafting.” Lindh v Murphy, 521 US 320, 336 (1997). See also Lee Kovarsky, AEDPA’s Wrecks: Comity, Finality, and Federal- ism, 82 Tulane L Rev 443, 447 (2007) (describing the provisions of AEDPA as “hastily ratified and poorly cohered”). 3 See, for example, Davis v Ayala, 135 S Ct 2187, 2197 (2015) (“For reasons of finali- ty, comity, and federalism, habeas petitioners are not entitled to habeas relief based on trial error unless they can establish that it resulted in ‘actual prejudice.’”) (quotation marks omitted); McQuiggin v Perkins, 133 S Ct 1924, 1932 (2013) (“It would be passing strange to interpret a statute seeking to promote federalism and comity as requiring .
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment a Coi in the Superior Court of Butts County State of Georgia
    ATTACHMENT A COI IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF BUTTS COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA MARION WILSON, JR., ) ) Petitioner, ) CASE NO: 2001-V-38 ) ) ) Iwi l3|ol ZDO& at ib-.tm. WILLIAM TERRY, Warden, ) Georgia Diagnostic and ) Classification Prison, ) Butts Superior Court ) Respondent. ) FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PURSUANT TO O.C.G.A. g 9-14-49 This matter comes before this Court on the Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as to his convictions and sentence of death from his trial in the Superior Court of Baldwin County. Having considered the Petitioner's original and amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the "Amended Petition"), the Respondent's Answers to the original and amended Petitions, relevant portions of the appellate record, evidence admitted at the hearing on this matter on February 22-23,2005, the documentary evidence submitted, the arguments of counsel, and the post-hearing briefs, this Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by O.C.G.A § 9-14-49. The Court denies the writ as to the Petitioner's convictions and as to the Petitioner's sentence of death. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1 XL SUMMARY OF RULINGS ON PETITIONERS CLAIMS FOR HABEAS RELIEF 3 m. FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 3 A. CLAMS THAT ARE BARRED FROM THIS COURT'S REVIEW BY THE DOCTRINE OF RES JUDICATA 3 B. CLAIMS THAT ARE PROCEDURALLY DEFAULTED 6 C. INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL 10 D. SENTENCING PHASE JURY INSTRUCTIONS .40 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Winter 2020 A quarterly report by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins Consultant to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Winter 2020 (As of January 1, 2020) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2620 (2,620 – 189* - 906M = 1525 enforceable sentences) Race of Defendant: White 1,103 (42.10%) Black 1,089 (41.56%) Latino/Latina 353 (13.47%) Native American 27 (1.03%) Asian 47 (1.79%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,567 (97.98%) Female 53 (2.02%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 31 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, CaliforniaM, ColoradoM, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, OregonM, PennsylvaniaM, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. M States where a moratorium prohibiting execution has been imposed by the Governor. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 22 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire [see note below], New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Hampshire repealed the death penalty prospectively. The man already sentenced remains under sentence of death.] * Designates the number of people in non-moratorium states who are not under active death sentence because of court reversal but whose sentence may be reimposed. M Designates the number of people in states where a gubernatorial moratorium on execution has been imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States Court of Appeals for The
    Case: 14-10681 Date Filed: 08/23/2016 Page: 1 of 92 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-10681 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:10-cv-00489-MTT MARION WILSON, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, versus WARDEN, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC PRISON, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ________________________ (August 23, 2016) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether, when a federal court reviews a state prisoner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, it must “look through” a Case: 14-10681 Date Filed: 08/23/2016 Page: 2 of 92 summary decision on the merits by a state appellate court to review the last reasoned decision. Marion Wilson, Jr., a Georgia prisoner sentenced to death for the murder of Donovan Parks in 1996, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court of Butts County, Georgia. That court denied his petition in a written opinion. Wilson sought to appeal that decision, and the Supreme Court of Georgia summarily denied his application for a certificate of probable cause to appeal. The district court then denied Wilson’s federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after reviewing the one-sentence decision of the Georgia Supreme Court, we affirmed. Wilson v. Warden, Ga. Diagnostic Prison, 774 F.3d 671, 681 (11th Cir. 2014), reh’g en banc granted, op.
    [Show full text]
  • HUD Telephone Directory Headquarters 1995
    r CPR MONITORS EMERGENCY NUMBERS Phone Room Exp.Floor Floor Phone Room Exp. Basement 7th Floor Ken Renalds 708-4490 BS-11 07/95 Larry Blume 708-1150 7270 04/95 Elaine Braverman 708-1433 7232 05/95 2nd Floor Heidi Chapman 708-1480 7274 06/95 E3 Truman Goins 708-3947 7240 03/95 □ Doug Reese 708-2836 7126 03/95 □ Melvin Green 708-2009 2180 04/95 Chris Kelly* 708-1496 2128 09/95 Medical Security Fire Brenda Lambert 708-4256 2124 06/95 8th Floor (Use Fire Alarm Sheila Martin 708-1392 2170 02/95 Doris Colclough 708-0344 8170 05/95 Boxes in Building) 3rd Floor Hilton L. Green* 708-0390 8274 09/95 James Hoben 708-0574 8140 05/95 Lisa Frampton 708-0351 3154 03/95 Sheryl L. Johnson 708-2998 8166 05/95 Kathleen Picot 708-0504 3180 03/95 Edwin Stromberg 708-4370 8134 07/95 911 Joe Piljay 708-1428 3130 04/95 911 703-3051 Kate Weddle 708-2905 3118 06/95 9th Floor (Also call the Health (Also, Federal Protective (Also call Building Security at 708-3051) Unit at 708-4265) Service at 708-1111) 4th Floor Juanita Baskin 708-1548 9128 03/95 Dana Boyd 708-1263 9252 05/95 Danielle Alston 708-4633 4156 05/95 Cindy Bridges 708-0582 9150 07/95 Sherry Fobear 708-4130 4224 02/95 Anita Hart 708-2716 9160 07/95 Nanci Gelb 708-0920 4230 03/95 Kim C. Jenkins 708-2676 9276 05/95 First Aid (Health Unit) Pat Lehrer 708-1197 4118 09/95 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 09 General Info.Indd
    NEWS MEDIA INFORMATION UCLA ON RADIO/TELEVISION Former Bruin quarterback Matt Stevens (’83- COACHES & STAFF 2009 BRUINS OPPONENTS 2008 IN REVIEW UCLA RECORDS TRADITION/ This season, UCLA’s football games will be broadcast 86) will be in his 13th season as a member on AM 570 (KLAC). This is the 13th year of UCLA’s of the broadcast team and his ninth as the association with Clear Channel Radio and its fourth analyst following four years as the sideline on AM 570. reporter. He will also serve as co-host of the pre-game show. The games will again be produced by International Sports Properties (ISP), UCLA's corporate and media Wayne Cook (’91-94), another former Bruin rights holder. ISP is also building a network on the West quarterback, will be in his eighth year as a Coast and KLAC serves as the fl agship station of the sideline reporter and pre-game show host. UCLA/ISP Sports Network. UCLA’s complete television plans were not The game broadcasts are also available on the Bruin defi nite at press time. web site at www.uclabruins.com. ESPN will televise the Tennessee game to a Chris Roberts will be in his 18th year as the play- national audience. ABC/ESPN is expected to Left to Right: Matt Stevens, Chris Roberts and Wayne Cook by-play voice of the Bruins. A four-time Golden Mike select other games 12 days prior to kickoff in winner, he also handles the play-by-play duties for accordance with its contract with the Pac-10 FS West and Prime Ticket, Los Angeles-based regional men’s basketball.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilson's Brief
    No. 16-6855 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- MARION WILSON, Petitioner, v. ERIC SELLERS, WARDEN, Respondent. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Eleventh Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF OF PETITIONER --------------------------------- --------------------------------- AUTUMN N. NERO BRIAN S. KAMMER* PERKINS COIE LLP MARCIA A. WIDDER 1 East Main Street 303 Elizabeth Street NE Madison, WI 53703 Atlanta, GA 30307 (608) 663-7460 (404) 222-9202 brian.kammer@ DAVID J. HARTH garesource.org 5 Waushara Circle Madison, WI 53705 MARK E. OLIVE (608) 233-8471 320 West Jefferson Street Tallahassee, FL 32301 (850) 224-0004 JOHN H. BLUME CORNELL LAW SCHOOL 158 Myron Taylor Hall Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 255-1030 Counsel for Petitioner *Counsel of Record ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i CAPITAL CASE QUESTION PRESENTED Did this Court’s decision in Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86 (2011), silently abrogate the presumption set forth in Ylst v. Nunnemaker, 501 U.S. 797 (1991) – that a federal court sitting in habeas proceedings should “look through” a summary state court ruling to review the last reasoned decision – as a slim majority of the en banc Eleventh Circuit held in
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Checklist 22
    Marion Wilson The Landscape Is Sanctuary to Our Fears Table of Contents Introduction 5 Essay 9 Illustrations 14 Exhibition Checklist 22 Artist Biography 25 Director’s Acknowledgments 26 Artist’s Acknowledgments 27 Cover: Marion Wilson Marion Wilson 40.9503 N, 72.4052 W (Lake Hopatcong, NJ), 2019 Mulberry Tree and Silkworms (detail), 2019 Digital print on painted mylar Oil paint on mylar 25 x 17 inches (framed) 38 x 46 inches Courtesy of the artist Courtesy of the artist Introduction Kristen Evangelista, gallery director rained as a painter, Marion Wilson grew up in a politically active family in New York City and later Teaneck, New Jersey. Her father was a New York state senator from 1963 to 1966, and her mother was an activist. This upbringing Tshaped her socially engaged art; for the past 15 years, she has worked collaboratively across media and disciplines. Wilson connects with undervalued communities and landscapes and interfaces with architects, developers, and scientists as a strategy to tackle social and ecological issues. She embraces scientific methods and apparatuses that facilitate “looking closely and paying attention to what is small and omnipresent and overlooked, while drawing parallels between the natural world and the most fundamental aspects of human presence.” In her current exhibition, The Landscape Is Sanctuary to Our Fears, Wilson builds upon her extensive background partnering with scientists, students, and communities. While an associate professor at Syracuse University, Wilson studied bryophytes, or moss, for a semester with botanist Dr. Robin Wall Kimmerer. Wilson was significantly influenced by Dr. Kimmerer’s approach using Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), which draws on the wisdom of both indigenous and scientific knowledge toward the shared goal of sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • 13307 UN Arches 14 V
    The Newcastle University Alumni Association Magazine Issue 14 / Summer 2011 Arches Enough, for all, forever: in pursuit of sustainability Tuition fees: the facts The true cost of dementia Visit: Arches Contents www.ncl.ac.uk/alumni Development and Alumni Relations Office Newcastle University King’s Gate Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU Telephone: +44 (0) 191 222 7250 Fax: +44 (0) 191 222 5905 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ncl.ac.uk/alumni Contents Contributors: Dan Howarth (editor); Frankie Clarke (deputy editor); Sam Wood; Anne Burton; James Johnston; Matt Ridley; Alexis Forsyth; Ian Wylie; Fran Infante; Lindsay Mackenzie; Hannah Wood; and Newcastle University Press Office. Acknowledgements: Many thanks to Anne Buckle, Anne Coxhead, Sanchia Coatsworth, Kelly Deary, John Mathers, Lynne Corner, Nina Laurie, Meena Poudel, Jennifer Harrison, Paul Bilsborrow, Anne Maule, Vikki Rimmer, Melanie Reed, Umbereen Rafiq, Clare Byatt and Vikki Wilkinson at Admiral PR, Nina Laurie, 05 Meena Poudel, and The Courier. Very special thanks to Shirley Tindle, Marion Wilson, Lindsey Crawford and the team at Granville, Charlotte Ball, Chris Pilkington and the team at Infinite Design, Jonathan Clark and the team at Potts, and all the staff in DARO, who have helped to make this magazine possible. Picture credits with thanks: Alexander Wilson, Lindsay Mackenzie, Darryl Ibbetson, Richard Kenworthy, Shruti Shrestha, Keith Ducatel, Samuel Aranda, David Bell, Jack Fallows, John Watson, Keith Pattinson, John Donoghue, The Courier, Alzheimer’s Research UK, Keith Bernstein and Universal Pictures. 12 24 04 News 16 Life after trafficking 26 The green age Keep up to date with the latest Fighting for equal rights to of cinema news, straight from campus citizenship in Nepal Arches meets Teresa Graham, whose work with London’s Lexi 08 Enough, for all, forever 18 The true cost Cinema supports a community in South Africa Cover illustration: Newcastle University and the Newcastle University and of dementia pursuit of sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2007, Volume 119, No
    NON-PROFIT ORG U.S. POSTAGE PAID Permit No. 108 Spartanburg, SC 580 East Main Street Spartanburg, South Carolina 29302 www.converse.edu Five talented, engaging Converse students have launched blogs about their lives – in the classroom, around campus, and beyond. Check out what they have to say at www.converse.edu/blog! Global Connections Lydia Anthony ,09 converse.edu/blog Sarah Walters ,08 ,09 Alyson Kielar Katelyn Ridenour ,10 Christine Wells ,09 GLOBAL CONNECTIONS 2 From the President ________________________________________________________ 3 International Awareness at Converse ________________________________________________________ 4 Global Connections ________________________________________________________ 6 Life Lessons from Uganda ________________________________________________________ 7 Culture Shock: A Nepalese in America ________________________________________________________ 8 Shedding My Westerner’s Lens: A Lifelong Quest for Understanding PAGE 4 ________________________________________________________ 10 Bringing a World of Experience to the Converse Classroom CONVERSE NEWS ________________________________________________________ 11 Life in Germany ________________________________________________________ 12 Today’s College Education: Expanding Perspectives through Study/Travel ________________________________________________________ 13 Doing Business with Central America ________________________________________________________ 14 From Ethiopia to America: Gaining A Better Understanding of My Place in the World ________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]