DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Charity Listing CFC NCA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Charity Listing CFC NCA 2020 Charity Listing Be the Face of Change Show Some Love at GiveCFC.org Dear Federal Colleagues: Be the Face of Change! The 2020 Combined Federal Campaign of the National Capital Area (CFCNCA) provides us an opportunity to Show Some Love for causes that are important to us. Thousands of organizations in the CFC look to us for support. They represent hundreds of causes, from hunger and healthcare, to animal welfare and injustice, to education and veterans. Here are a few examples of the positive impact you can have locally, nationally and internationally, when you join the CFC community: • $25 equips volunteer firefighters serving their community; • $58 covers one year of school fees and supplies for a child; • $200 trains a veteran to enter the civilian workforce. This is our campaign and our story. Together we give, volunteer and engage to raise critical funds for thousands of beneficiaries, whom we may never meet. When we help those in need, we help write their story to success; and in turn, write the story of our own philanthropic legacy. There is no better time to Show Some Love, wherever you are. Visit GiveCFC.org to come together and Be the Face of Change. Thank you, Vince Micone Ann Van Houten Chairperson Vice Chairperson Local Federal Coordinating Committee, Local Federal Coordinating Committee, CFCNCA CFCNCA P.S.: Keep this in mind – legislation in 2020 may allow you to take a charitable deduction regardless of itemizing or using the standard deduction. Please consult with your tax advisor for qualifying charitable donations! Colleagues, I am thrilled once again to serve as the Honorary Chairperson for the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC). Being part of the CFC takes my service as Director of the Peace Corps to even greater heights, and provides me the opportunity to help those in need by joining forces and combining efforts and generosity with all. This year, I invite all members of the federal community – wherever you are, if you are working from home or back in your office – to join the CFC community andBe the Face of Change. This year has challenged us all in unexpected ways, but the season of giving is a time to reflect and remember our blessings too. Consider opening your heart and making a pledge to help those less fortunate through the CFC. Federal employees, you’re also invited to donate your time with a pledge of volunteer hours. You can browse this catalogue for numerous opportunities to engage and give back to our local, national, and global communities. People in need around the world are relying on our help now more than ever. Together, we can make a difference. Give to a charitable cause you care about through the CFC now! Thank you for your generosity and choosing to Show Some Love. Sincerely, Dr. Jody K. Olsen Director, Peace Corps 2020 CFC Honorary Chairperson GiveCFC.org 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ............................................................ 3 MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION NETWORK INC ...... 40 HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA About the CFCNCA ......................................... 6 ............................................................................................ 41 HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AMERICA Local Section ................................................. 8 ............................................................................................ 42 EARTHSHARE .................................................................... 44 ANIMAL WELFARE FUND INC ........................................... 8 CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION CHARITIES OF AUTISM SUPPORT AND CHILDREN’S SERVICE FUND, INC. AMERICA ............................................................................ 45 .............................................................................................. 8 CHRISTIAN SERVICE CHARITIES ....................................... 46 LOCAL ANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA ......................... 8 AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS ................................. 47 HORSE WELFARE LEAGUE INC ........................................... 8 LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES ..................................... 8 CHARITIES (LGBT CHARITIES INC) ................................... 47 THE UNITED WAY OF CHARLES COUNTY INC .................. 9 HEALTH FIRST - AMERICA’S CHARITIES .......................... 48 CAT RESCUE FUND INC ...................................................... 9 MILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA ....................................... 48 UNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA ............. 9 AMERICA’S CHARITIES ...................................................... 50 RAPPAHANNOCK UNITED WAY INC ............................... 20 INDEPENDENT CHARITIES ............................................... 51 EARTHSHARE CHAPTERS INC .......................................... 20 AMERICA’S BEST CHARITIES ............................................ 58 COMMUNITY FIRST - AMERICA’S CHARITIES .................. 30 AMERICA’S BEST LOCAL CHARITIES ................................ 31 International Section .................................. 66 DOG RESCUE FUND INC ................................................... 32 CHILD AID INTERNATIONAL INC ..................................... 66 GLOBAL IMPACT ............................................................... 66 National/International Section ................. 32 INDEPENDENT CHARITIES ............................................... 68 ANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA .................................... 32 MILITARY AND VETERANS SUPPORT GROUPS OF Index ............................................................. 70 AMERICA (MILITARY SUPPORT GROUPS OF AMERICA) 34 CHILDREN FIRST - AMERICA’S CHARITIES ...................... 36 CHRISTIAN CHARITIES USA .............................................. 36 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES .................................... 38 MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES INC .............................. 40 2 Show Some Love COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN (CFC) What is the CFC? - The ability of campaign workers to track campaign progress with daily The CFC is the only authorized solicitation of all federal employees in their updates of pledges workplaces, postal service employees, Active Duty military, retired members of the Both sites are smartphone friendly. military, and retired civilians on behalf of approved charitable organizations. • • A CFC Giving Mobile App for Apple and Android devices allows a donor to What is the mission of the CFC? pledge on-the-go. The Mobile Giving App allows donors to find CFC events like The CFC mission is to support and promote philanthropy through a voluntary charity fairs, fund-raisers, and more. Donors can search for a charity and make program that is employee-focused, cost-efficient, and effective in providing all a one-time pledge using a bank account or credit card. The app also supports federal employees the opportunity to improve the quality of life for all. Touch ID and Face ID for easy and secure access to your giving account. Using the same log-on username and password integrates the rest of the When did the CFC begin? donor’s desktop profile from cfcgiving.opm.gov (such as the ZIP code for zone The Federal Government created the CFC in 1961 to coordinate the fund-raising integration and the Department, Agency, and Office profile). efforts of various charitable organizations. CFC solicits once-a-year contributions in the workplace and provides employees, retirees, and others the opportunity to How does CFC ensure public accountability? make one-time or recurring charitable contributions through payroll deduction or OPM assures federal employees that CFC honors your designations and distributes other means. those funds to the charitable organizations you choose. OPM achieves this in Federal employee giving makes CFC one of the largest and most successful workplace several ways: philanthropic fundraisers in the world. Continuing a long-standing tradition, in 1. OPM maintains eligibility and public accountability criteria that all participating the 2019 campaign year, federal employees, postal workers, and members of the CFC charities must meet. For details, see CFC Regulations in 5 CFR Part 950 at uniformed services pledged more than $86 million to charitable causes. The pledge www.opm.gov/combined-federal-campaign/reference-materials/. total includes almost $83.5 million in financial pledges and the monetary value of $2.9 million in commitments of volunteer time. The total also includes pledges made 2. Every year, OPM makes final application decisions for all local, national, and during the April-June CFC Special Solicitation for COVID-19 victims. international charity applicants and resolves charity admission appeals. Since its inception, federal employees have contributed more than $8.4 billion to 3. OPM and federal contract rules set strict requirements and provide on-going charities through CFC. guidance for the activities and conduct of the CCA and the OCs. OPM verifies the fiscal integrity of the campaign annually through compliance and financial What is the structure of the CFC? audits completed by the CCA, an independent CPA, or the OPM Inspector There are 36 campaign Zones in the CFC. Each Zone organizes the annual fund- General raising effort in the local federal workplaces, military installations, and post offices in that jurisdiction or overseas. What is the CFC Charity List? The Charity List is a web-based and paper display of local, national, and international
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summer 2016 Comfort the Afflicted
    summer 2016 vol 17 • no 3 Comfort the Afflicted ROUNDTABLE PARISH PROFILE LAST WORD Anti-Violence St. Clement Parish Peace Corner 4 6 18 SPIRIT magazine contents summer 2016 SUMMER 2016 VOL 17, NO 3 interim editor Kristine Kappel writers Communications Department Development Department Program Service Areas photos Catholic Charities Communications and Program Archives creative director Jennifer Sirota art design Kathleen Gabriel editorial board Rev. Monsignor Michael M. Boland president Kathy Donahue senior vice president, program development & evaluation John Ryan Comfort the Afflicted chief of staff Judith Silekis director of development Kristine Kappel director of communications monsignor boland roundtable 2 Walking with the 4 Comforting the Afflicted Less Fortunate in the Wake of Violence parish profile 6 St. Clement Parish spirit magazine © Catholic Charities 2016 program news Catholic Charities 9 of the Archdiocese of Chicago 721 North LaSalle Street events Chicago, Illinois 60654 14 Spirit Magazine is published by Catholic Charities of the the last word Archdiocese of Chicago Turning the Corner for its friends, clients 18 on Violence and benefactors. Spirit Magazine Editors and Staff Phone (312) 655-7010 [email protected] Postage paid in Chicago, IL 60654 Postmaster: Send change of address to: Spirit Magazine 721 N. LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60654 2016 JUBILEE www.catholiccharities.net/spirit OF MERCY 2 SPIRIT summer 2016 monsignor boland Walking with the less fortunate Rev. Monsignor Michael M. Boland president of catholic charities In celebration of the Jubilee Year of Mercy, each issue of Spirit magazine is focusing on a different work of mercy. With a violent and heartbreaking story making news almost every day in our great city, we felt “Comfort the Afflicted” would be an appropriate and most welcome theme for our summer issue.
    [Show full text]
  • A Program in Flux: New Priorities and Implementation Challenges for 287(G)
    A Program in Flux: New Priorities and Implementation Challenges for 287(g) Cristina Rodríguez, Muzaffar Chishti, Randy Capps, and Laura St. John March 2010 Acknowledgments This report and the research underlying it were supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York. The authors would like to thank Doris Meissner, Donald Kerwin, Laureen Laglagaron, and Margot Mendelson of the Migration Policy Institute for their guidance in the writing and editing of this report, as well as Justin Cox, formerly of Casa de Maryland. Nicole Svajlenka, a graduate student at George Washington University, developed the map included in the report. The authors would also like to thank staff from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, especially the Office of State and Local Coordination, as well as several state and national civil-rights organizations for providing their important perspectives. © 2010 Migration Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Migration Policy Institute. A full-text PDF of this document is available for free download from www.migrationpolicy.org. Permission for reproducing excerpts from this report should be directed to: Permissions Department, Migration Policy Institute, 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036, or by contacting [email protected]. Suggested citation: Rodríguez, Cristina, Muzaffar Chishti, Randy Capps, and Laura St. John. 2010. A Program in Flux: New Priorities and Implementation Challenges for 287(g). Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Providing a Roadmap to Citizenship Making
    THE MAGAZINE OF CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA | WINTER 2019 n VOLUME 46 n NUMBER 1 Providing a roadmap to citizenship The Esperanza Center of Catholic Charities of Baltimore Making people feel at home Casa Alitas of Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Keeping families together THE MINISTRY OF FAMILY REUNIFICATION Charities USA (ISSN 0364-0760) is published by Catholic Charities USA. Address all correspondence to the Managing Editor. © 2019 Catholic Charities USA, Alexandria, Virginia. EDITOR’S COLUMN Editorial and Business Office 2050 Ballenger Ave., Suite 400, Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel: 703-549-1390 • Fax: 703-549-1656 The Catholic Charities ministry has provided help to unaccompanied www.CatholicCharitiesUSA.org | [email protected] children for more than 100 years, from orphanages in the early 20th century to family reunification services today. Catholic Charities USA is the national office for one of the nation’s largest social service networks. Member agencies and The backgrounds and circumstances of the children have changed institutions nationwide provide vital social services to almost over the years, but Catholic Charities’ commitment to find shelter, 9 million people in need, regardless of their religious, social or economic backgrounds. Catholic Charities USA supports and clothing, healthy food, education and sponsors has never wavered. enhances the work of its members by providing networking opportunities, national advocacy, program development, The summer of 2018 was an especially challenging time when training and consulting and financial benefits. many children travelling with their families from the Northern Triangle Donate Now: 1-800-919-9338 | ccusa.convio.net/support (Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador) were separated from their par- ents because of the administration’s policy to arrest and separate Publisher adults and children who entered the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Return of Private Foundation CT' 10 201Z '
    Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990 -PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Department of the Treasury Treated as a Private Foundation Internal Revenue Service Note. The foundation may be able to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirem M11 For calendar year 20 11 or tax year beainnina . 2011. and ending . 20 Name of foundation A Employer Identification number THE PFIZER FOUNDATION, INC. 13-6083839 Number and street (or P 0 box number If mail is not delivered to street address ) Room/suite B Telephone number (see instructions) (212) 733-4250 235 EAST 42ND STREET City or town, state, and ZIP code q C If exemption application is ► pending, check here • • • • • . NEW YORK, NY 10017 G Check all that apply Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D q 1 . Foreign organizations , check here . ► Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, check here and attach Address chang e Name change computation . 10. H Check type of organization' X Section 501( exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947 ( a)( 1 ) nonexem pt charitable trust Other taxable p rivate foundation q 19 under section 507(b )( 1)(A) , check here . ► Fair market value of all assets at end J Accounting method Cash X Accrual F If the foundation is in a60-month termination of year (from Part Il, col (c), line Other ( specify ) ---- -- ------ ---------- under section 507(b)(1)(B),check here , q 205, 8, 166. 16) ► $ 04 (Part 1, column (d) must be on cash basis) Analysis of Revenue and Expenses (The (d) Disbursements total of amounts in columns (b), (c), and (d) (a) Revenue and (b) Net investment (c) Adjusted net for charitable may not necessanly equal the amounts in expenses per income income Y books purposes C^7 column (a) (see instructions) .) (cash basis only) I Contribution s odt s, grants etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Our Faith Through Actions
    Living Our Faith Through Actions 2019 ANNUAL REPORT For 110 years, Catholic Charities has been a recognized name at the forefront of social services in America. Dedicated to the reduction of poverty, the Catholic Charities ministry serves and advocates for millions of individuals—regardless of their ethnicity, background or faith tradition—every year. A Message from the President Dear Friends, As I sit in my “hermitage” today reflecting on the past year, I cannot but help think how quickly our lives have changed. Over the course of 2019, we served an increasing number of people in need of so many life-sustaining services. Your support, spiritually as well as monetarily, enabled us to do that. These pages provide a snapshot of what you have helped us accomplish. I remain so grateful to be part of such a gospel-driven ministry populated by so many women and men of deep faith and kindness. Little could I have imagined in 2019 that within the scope of two months, thousands more people would come to us for help. Today, we are faced with continuing our efforts to extend our care to so many people who have lost employment, lost their homes, and haven’t enough to eat. Additionally, many are deeply frightened and depressed. While the delivery of services has radically changed, we remain committed to accompanying them. I trust deeply in God’s providence that we will continue to discover surprising ways to meet unimaginable challenges! Please hold all of us in the ministry of charity in your prayer and know that you are treasured partners in this compelling work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cone Nonprofit Power Brand 100 in Collaboration with Intangible Business Table of Contents
    The Cone Nonprofit Power Brand 100 In collaboration with Intangible Business Table of Contents Introduction 3 Why Value a Nonprofit’s Brand? 4 Cone & Intangible Business 5 Methodology 6 The Cone Nonprofit Power Brand 100 8 The Top 10 13 Brand Image Leaders 17 The Brand Image-Revenue Dynamic 19 Nonprofit Power Brand Sectors 21 - Domestic Social Needs 22 - Education/Youth 23 - Environmental/Animal 24 - Health 25 - International Needs 26 10 Essentials for Enhancing Brand Power 27 Conclusion 30 Full Methodology 31 About Cone 33 About Intangible Business 34 Introduction Boom or bust, the dollar is king. Although financial performance is a universal measure by which most organizations gauge success, it is only part of the value equation. The power of a brand is an essential and often-underestimated measure of organizational vigor, one that is intrinsically linked to financial performance and long-term viability. It speaks to an orga- nization’s reputation and can positively, or negatively, affect stakeholder engagement and loyalty. Corporate America has long understood the importance of brand, but in the nonprofit sector, this factor can be overlooked. And, no wonder – a “brand” can be an ambiguous concept, one typically associated with business and the sale of commercial goods, not charities affecting the greater good. Without a deeper examination, brands may seem less relevant in the nonprofit space where social missions drive existence. But, in a sector where more than 1.5 million organizations1 compete for dwindling resources (the IRS approved almost 55,000 new 501(c)(3) applications in 2008 alone2), a solid brand identity tells an important story.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Chemical Defense Fluids of Macrotermes Carbonarius
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Evaluation of the chemical defense fuids of Macrotermes carbonarius and Globitermes sulphureus as possible household repellents and insecticides S. Appalasamy1,2*, M. H. Alia Diyana2, N. Arumugam2 & J. G. Boon3 The use of chemical insecticides has had many adverse efects. This study reports a novel perspective on the application of insect-based compounds to repel and eradicate other insects in a controlled environment. In this work, defense fuid was shown to be a repellent and insecticide against termites and cockroaches and was analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC– MS). Globitermes sulphureus extract at 20 mg/ml showed the highest repellency for seven days against Macrotermes gilvus and for thirty days against Periplaneta americana. In terms of toxicity, G. sulphureus extract had a low LC50 compared to M. carbonarius extract against M. gilvus. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of the M. carbonarius extract indicated the presence of six insecticidal and two repellent compounds in the extract, whereas the G. sulphureus extract contained fve insecticidal and three repellent compounds. The most obvious fnding was that G. sulphureus defense fuid had higher potential as a natural repellent and termiticide than the M. carbonarius extract. Both defense fuids can play a role as alternatives in the search for new, sustainable, natural repellents and termiticides. Our results demonstrate the potential use of termite defense fuid for pest management, providing repellent and insecticidal activities comparable to those of other green repellent and termiticidal commercial products. A termite infestation could be silent, but termites are known as destructive urban pests that cause structural damage by infesting wooden and timber structures, leading to economic loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Limits on Union Organization of Undocumented Day Laborers
    Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 7 Winter 1-26-2017 Organizing in the Shadows: Limits on Union Organization of Undocumented Day Laborers Paige Coomer Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse Part of the Law Commons Publication Citation Paige Coomer, Organizing in the Shadows: Limits on Union Organization of Undocumented Day Laborers, 5 Ind. J.L. & Soc. Equality 145 (2017). This Student Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE Organizing in the Shadows: Limits on Union Organization of Undocumented Day Laborers Paige Coomer* ABSTRACT This Note illustrates how the current US labor scheme acts as an impediment to union organization of undocumented day laborers. While the market for these contingent workers grows, so too does the need for worker protection from abuses. However, unions face legal and structural barriers that prevent them from effectively organizing day laborers. Ultimately, these legal and structural barriers show that the US labor scheme as a whole is incapable of effectively responding to the needs of day laborers, and by extension, to the needs of a globalized, migrant workforce. My Note argues that by failing to adapt to changes brought on by globalization, our labor law cannot be harnessed to protect vulnerable day laborers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Greed Perceptions in Consumer Support for Social Ventures
    To Profit or Not to Profit? The Role of Greed Perceptions in Consumer Support for Social Ventures SAEROM LEE LISA E. BOLTON KAREN PAGE WINTERICH An increasing number of social ventures are for-profit companies (i.e., for- profit social ventures) that seek to advance a social cause while making a profit. In a series of seven studies, this research investigates consumer sup- port for organizations as a function of their social mission and profit orienta- tion. The impact of profit orientation on consumer support depends on the prominence of the organization’s social mission. For organizations with a prominent social mission, profits are interpreted as a signal of greed; absent a prominent social mission, a for-profit orientation can instead imply greater competence. As a result, consumer support of for-profit social ventures suffers in comparison to both nonprofits and traditional for-profits—a downside to the organizational benefits of for-profit social ventures identified in prior research. In addition, this research investigates organizational factors—including exces- sive organizational spending, profit perceptions, and operational efficiency cues—that alter greed perceptions and consequently support for for-profit so- cial ventures. Together, this research sheds light on consumer reaction to organizations that support social causes, with implications for the social ven- ture marketplace, including the nonprofit versus for-profit quandary faced by social entrepreneurs. Keywords: for-profit social ventures, nonprofit, greed, social mission, profit orienta- tion, communal norms A social entrepreneur’s quandary: non-profit or for-profit? Saerom Lee ([email protected]) is assistant professor of marketing —New York Times, 10 July 2013 at the University of Texas at San Antonio, College of Business, One For love or lucre UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unladylike Ladies of Roller Derby?: How Spectators, Players and Derby Wives Do and Redo Gender and Heteronormativity in All-Female Roller Derby
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by White Rose E-theses Online The Unladylike Ladies of Roller Derby?: How Spectators, Players and Derby Wives Do and Redo Gender and Heteronormativity in All-Female Roller Derby Megan Geneva Murray PhD The University of York Women’s Studies January 2012 Abstract All-female roller derby is a rapidly growing full-contact sport played on quad roller skates, with a highly popularized punk, feminine, sexual and tough aesthetic. Utilising theories on the institution of heterosexuality, I conducted a qualitative study on all-female roller derby which evaluated the way in which derby aligns with or challenges heteronormativity. In order to approach this question, I analysed, firstly, thirty-eight interviews with spectators, and twelve with players about their interactions with spectators. Secondly, I interviewed twenty-six players about the phenomenon of “derby wives,” a term used to describe particular female friendships in roller derby. My findings relate the complex relationship between players and spectators by focusing on: (i) spectators’ interpretations of the dress, pseudonyms, and identities of players, as well as the ways in which they were actively involved in doing gender through their discussions of all-female, coed, and all-male roller derby; (ii) players’ descriptions of their interactions with spectators, family members, romantic partners, friends and strangers, regarding roller derby. Additionally, I address the reformulation of the role “wife” to meet the needs of female players within the community, and “derby wives” as an example of Adrienne Rich’s (1980) “lesbian continuum.” “Derby girls” are described as “super heroes” and “rock stars.” Their pseudonyms are believed to help them “transform” once they take to the track.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Kennedy School Journal of Hispanic Policy a Harvard Kennedy School Student Publication
    Harvard Kennedy School Journal of Hispanic Policy A Harvard Kennedy School Student Publication Volume 30 Staff Kristell Millán Editor-in-Chief Estivaliz Castro Senior Editor Alberto I. Rincon Executive Director Bryan Cortes Senior Editor Leticia Rojas Managing Editor, Print Jazmine Garcia Delgadillo Senior Amanda R. Matos Managing Editor, Editor Digital Daniel Gonzalez Senior Editor Camilo Caballero Director, Jessica Mitchell-McCollough Senior Communications Editor Rocio Tua Director, Alumni & Board Noah Toledo Senior Editor Relations Max Wynn Senior Editor Sara Agate Senior Editor Martha Foley Publisher Elizabeth Castro Senior Editor Richard Parker Faculty Advisor Recognition of Former Editors A special thank you to the former editors Alex Rodriguez, 1995–96 of the Harvard Kennedy School Journal of Irma Muñoz, 1996–97 Hispanic Policy, previously known as the Myrna Pérez, 1996–97 Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy, whose Eraina Ortega, 1998–99 legacy continues to be a source of inspira- Nereyda Salinas, 1998–99 tion for Latina/o students Harvard-wide. Raúl Ruiz, 1999–2000 Maurilio León, 1999–2000 Henry A.J. Ramos, Founding Editor, Sandra M. Gallardo, 2000–01 1984–86 Luis S. Hernandez Jr., 2000–01 Marlene M. Morales, 1986–87 Karen Hakime Bhatia, 2001–02 Adolph P. Falcón, 1986–87 Héctor G. Bladuell, 2001–02 Kimura Flores, 1987–88 Jimmy Gomez, 2002–03 Luis J. Martinez, 1988–89 Elena Chávez, 2003–04 Genoveva L. Arellano, 1989–90 Adrian J. Rodríguez, 2004–05 David Moguel, 1989–90 Edgar A. Morales, 2005–06 Carlo E. Porcelli, 1990–91 Maria C. Alvarado, 2006–07 Laura F. Sainz, 1990–91 Tomás J. García, 2007–08 Diana Tisnado, 1991–92 Emerita F.
    [Show full text]
  • Task Force on Secure Communities Findings and Recommendations
    HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISORY COUNCIL TASK FORCE ON SECURE COMMUNITIES FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SEPTEMBER 2011 1 Task Force on Secure Communities Chuck Wexler (Chair), Executive Director, Police Executive Research Forum Bo Cooper, Partner, Berry Appleman & Leiden L.L.P. Adrian Garcia, Sheriff, Harris County, Texas Douglas Gillespie, Sheriff, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Robert Glaves, Executive Director, The Chicago Bar Foundation Benjamin Johnson, Executive Director, American Immigration Council Andrew Lauland, Homeland Security Advisor to Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley Laura Lichter, Partner, Lichter & Associates, P.C. David A. Martin, Professor of Law, University of Virginia Charles Ramsey, Commissioner of Police, Philadelphia Lupe Valdez, Sheriff, Dallas County, Texas Roberto Villaseñor, Chief of Police, Tucson, Arizona Wendy Wayne, Director, Immigration Impact Unit, Committee for Public Counsel Services Sister Rosemary Welsh, Executive Director, Casa de Misericordia and Director, Mercy Ministries Outreach 2 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 Findings and Recommendations………………………………………………………………...…..9 I. Misunderstandings Regarding the Secure Communities Program and the Role of Local Law Enforcement Agencies ..............................................................10 II. Perceived Inconsistencies Between Secure Communities’ Stated Goals and Outcomes ...16 III. Minor Traffic Offenses and Misdemeanors
    [Show full text]