Welsh Government Consultation – Summary of Responses
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Number: WG31204 Welsh Government Consultation – summary of responses Draft Integrated Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report for the National Development Framework Updated September 2018 Mae’r ddogfen yma hefyd ar gael yn Gymraeg. This document is also available in Welsh. © Crown Copyright Digital ISBN 978-1-78859-794-4 Contents Page No. • Introduction 1 • What was the consultation about? 1 • Consultation details 1 • Next Steps 2 • Statistical Breakdown and Overview of the 3 Responses to Each Question • Annex 1 o Consultation Response Table 22 o Consultation Response Table -Annexes to Representations 130 Introduction 1. This is an updated version of the consultation summary of response report initially published in January 2018 it consolidates all representations received to the consultation. It was brought to our attention that a small number of representations received were not reviewed at the same time as the original but have since been reviewed and dealt with in the same way as the original representations and are set out in this version of the report. 2. A 12 week consultation exercise for the draft Integrated Sustainability Appraisal (ISA) of the National Development Framework (NDF) took place between April 28 2017 and July 21 2017. This consultation summary report details the representations to the consultation exercise, the Welsh Government response and outlines the next steps. What was the consultation about? 3. The consultation sought views on the draft ISA Scoping Report for the NDF. The draft Scoping Report is the first step of the ISA for the NDF. This was an important consultation as it will help steer the development of the ISA and the NDF, from its early stages. Consultation details 4. Stakeholders were contacted from a core consultation list held by the Planning Directorate of Welsh Government and also through the NDF newsletter. These stakeholders included all local planning authorities in Wales, together with relevant public bodies, businesses, special interest groups and professional bodies. The consultation documentation was also made available on the Welsh Government consultation website. A workshop was held on 2 May 2017 as part of the consultation on the draft Scoping report which enabled stakeholders to discuss and help shape the ISA. 5. In total, 35 consultation representations were received from: • Caerphilly County Borough Council; • Cardiff City Council; • Newport City Council; • Natural Resources Wales; • CADW; • Dyfodol i’r Iaith; • Mochdre with Penstrowed Community Council; • Llandudno Town Council; • Pupils2Parliament; • Health and Safety Executive; • Joint Response Wales Health Impact Assessment Support Unit Environmental Public Health Service Wales and Public Health Wales; • Three National Park Authorities; 1 • Accessible Retail; • Clwydian Range and Dee Valley AONB; • Glandŵr Cymru; • Home Builders Federation; • Age Cymru; • RTPI Cymru; • Barry Town Council; • Well-Being of Future Generations Commissioner; • Valpak Limited; • Newtown and Llanllwchaiarn Town Council; • Tidal Lagoon Power; • Persimmon Homes East Wales; • Royal Society or Architects in Wales (Royal Institute of British Architects); • Mineral Products Association; • Community Housing Cymru; • Wildlife Trusts Wales; • Sustrans Cymru; • Persimmon Homes West Wales; • Maesteg Town Council; • Community Council of Carew; • Historic Houses Association • Two Individuals 6. All representations have been considered fully. Welsh Government’s responses to the representations made, and how they have shaped the ISA, are recorded and presented within this summary consultation report in Annex 1. Next Steps 7. The ISA Scoping Report, as amended from the consultation, has been published alongside this consultation summary report: https://gov.wales/topics/planning/national-development-framework-for- wales/resources/integrated-sustainability-appraisal-scoping-report-for- the-national-development-framework/?lang=en . 8. The NDF Issues, Options and Preferred Option stage was published for a full public consultation in April 2018. 9. The issues, options and preferred option will be assessed using the ISA Framework within the Scoping Report and an Interim ISA Report will set out the details of this assessment. The ISA interim report will: • Demonstrate how the ISA has shaped the development of the NDF; • Set out the methodology for the appraisal; • Set out the options that were considered, how they were identified and any mitigation measures proposed; 2 • Set out the social, economic, cultural and environmental effects of the Issues and Options and Preferred Option; • Describe the proposals for monitoring. 10. This interim ISA Report was consulted upon. Further information about future stages of the ISA process can be found in Section 2.1 of the final Scoping Report. Statistical Breakdown and Overview of the Representations to Each Question 11. Many respondents did not fill in the consultation form when providing their response to the consultation. As such, a number of representations have been attributed as “no response”. This is because the respondent did not fill out the proforma that was provided but chose to submit a separate response. This is in contrast to some representations being attributed to “did not answer” who simply did not answer the question on the proforma. 3 Question 1 Do you support the findings of the review of relevant plans, programmes and environmental protection objectives? Are there any additional plans, programmes or environmental protection objectives you would like to add? Are there any that you would like to remove from the review? (Section 3) Statistical Review 12. Sixteen respondents support the findings of the review of relevant plans, programmes and environmental protection objectives, six with further comments, while sixteen did not provide a response and three did not answer No respondents who completed the consultation form disagreed with this question. Question 1 Yes Yes but with No Did not further Response answer comment Business 0 1 5 0 LPA 2 1 0 1 Govt. 3 0 6 0 Agency/Other Public Sector Professional 0 1 0 0 Body/Interest Group Voluntary Sector 0 1 3 0 Other 5 2 2 2 Total 10 6 16 3 Representations: 4 Representation (number) Agreed 10 Agreed but with further 16 comment Did not answer No response 6 Overview 13. Additional plans, strategies and legislation were suggested by respondents to be included as it was felt that these should be considered as part of the review. These were considered and added to the Plans Policies and Programmes Review and Sustainability Themes linked to the ISA where appropriate. 14. A full detailed breakdown of responses to the representations made, the Welsh Government responses and details of the changes made can be found in Annex 1. 5 Question 2 Do you agree with the sustainability issues that we have identified? Are there additional issues that the ISA should consider? If so, what are they? (Section 4) Statistical Review 15. Twenty respondents agreed with the sustainability issues identified in the draft ISA framework ten of whom also made further comments. While no one disagreed with the question, three did not answer and twelve did not provide a response. Question Yes Yes but with No Did not further Response answer comment Business 2 2 3 0 LPA 1 2 0 1 Govt. 3 1 3 0 Agency/Other Public Sector Professional 1 2 1 0 Body/Interest Group Voluntary 0 1 2 0 Sector Other 3 2 3 2 Total 10 10 12 3 Representation Representations (number) Agreed 10 12 Agreed but with futher comment Did not answer No response 2 10 6 Overview 16. Over half of the respondents supported the sustainability issues identified. A number of additional issues were raised including the need to: • Consider material assets more fully; • Expand on ecosystem resilience and Natural Resources Policy throughout the report; • Strengthen climate change throughout the report recognising the wider implications not just flooding; • Include more data on National Parks; • Give geodiversity more recognition, not just something that underpins biodiversity; • Include more on the City Regions; • Strengthen how the ways of working have influenced and will continue to influence the work; • Clarify interaction between marine and terrestrial planning; • Recognise the variations with regards to the use of the Welsh language, including the role of the planning system; • More specific referece to the heritage sector and links between tourism and heritage. 17. All representations have been reviewed and changes have been made where appropriate. A full detailed breakdown of responses to the representations made, the Welsh Government response and details of the changes made can be found in Annex 1. 7 Question 3 Are there any particular topics or geographical areas of specific concern to you or your organisation? (Section 4) Statistical Review 18. While four respondents disagreed with this question, thirteen agreed six with further comments, three did not answer and fifteen did not provide a response. Question Yes Yes but No Did not Disagree with Response answer further comment Business 0 2 5 0 0 LPA 2 1 1 0 0 Govt. 1 1 3 0 1 Agency/Other Public Sector Professional 2 0 1 0 1 Body/Interest Group Voluntary Sector 0 2 1 0 0 Other 2 0 4 3 2 Total 7 6 15 3 4 Representations: Representations (number) 4 Agreed 7 Agreed but with further comment Did not answer 6 No response 15 Disagreed 2 8 Overview 19. Representations made included a number of topics and areas to be included such as: • Sustainable Management of Natural Resources; • Climate Change; • Welsh Language; • City Regions; • Health and Well-Being; • Active Travel; • Forestry 20. These have been considered and appropriate changes made. A full detailed breakdown of responses to the representations made, the Welsh Government response and details of the changes made can be found in Annex 1. 21. A number of projects were also submitted, these will be considered as part of the call for evidence and projects workstream. 9 Question 4 Are there any changes you consider should be made to the ISA Objectives or Questions? (Section 5) Statistical Review 22.