Poaceae) for the Flora of Turkey
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mta Doktori Értekezé Ss
MTA DOKTORI ÉRTEKEZÉS Biotechnológia a növénynemesítési alapanyagok előállításában, a fitoremediációs fajok genetikai kontrolljában, és a kultúrnövények arheogenetikai stabilitásának meghatározásában Gyulai Gábor DSc Dissertation Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Budapest Szent István Egyetem MKK GBI, Gödöllő 2010 Gyulai G (2010) MTA Doktori Értekezés Ajánlás Ajánlás Ezúton ajánlom Értekezésemet egyetemi (SzIE / GATE), kari (MKK) és intézeti (GBI / GNT) munkatársaimnak; Heszky László akadémikus, ny. intézetvezető Úrnak; Kiss Erzsébet egyetemi tanár, intézetvezető Asszonynak megemlékezésel a negyedszázados együttműködésre. Tanítványi tisztelettel ajánlom Munkámat tanáraimnak Prof. Dr. Lehoczki Endre tanár Úrnak emlékezve egyetemi Doktori Disszertációm (1984) és Diplomamunkám (1982) témavezetésére; és történelem tanáraimnak id. Heltai Miklós és Gyulai Sándor tanár Úrnak a bölcs útmutatásokért. Gratulációval emlékezem PhD tanítványaimra - Bittsánszky András Dr, Lágler Richárd, Szabó Zoltán Dr, Tóth Zoltán - az együtt végzett friss szellemű kutatásokért és az elért tudományos eredményekért, valamint korábbi Doktoranduszaimra és MSc Hallgatóimra (1 - 44) az elvégzett munkákért. Külföldi előadó- és tanulmányútaim tapasztalataiért és tudományos eredményeiért ezúton ajánlom Munkámat együttműködő Professzor társaimnak Alan Schulman, Ruslan Kalendar (Helszinki Egyetem, Fi); Fenny Dane, Luther Waters (Auburn Egyetemen, USA); Mervyn Humphreys (IGER, Aberystwyth, Welsz - UK); Marion Röder, Urlich Wobus (IPK, Gatersleben, D); Herb Ohm (Purdue Egyetem, USA); -
Á Biologická Klasifikace Rostlin -.. Inovace Studia Molekulární A
Inovace studia molekulární a buněčné biologie Tento projekt je spolufinancován Evropským sociálním fondem a státním rozpočtem České republiky. BIOLOGICKÁ KLASIFIKACE ROSTLIN Radim J. Vašut Gnetoppyhyta Gnetophyta • Dvoudomé i jednodomé dřeviny • Náznak 2-tého oplození • Redukce mikroprotália • Eustélé bez prysky ř. Kanálků, atypické tracheje Ephedridae • 1 rod, 40 druhů, stepní až aridní oblasti • 2vají2 vajíčka / 2 archegonia •Přeličkovitý vzhled Ephedra distachya jediný zástupce ve středoevropské flóře (Slovensko) Gnetidae • Dvoudomé i jednodomé dřeviny • Náznak 2-tého oplození • Redukce mikroprotália • Eustélé bez prysky ř. Kanálků, atypické tracheje Gnetum spp. • Ca. 30 druhů ()(tropy) • Hromada hadrů • EtéExtrémn í suc ho • Až 2000 let Welwitschiidae • Welwitschia mirablis • Náznak 2-tého oplození • RdkRedukce m ikropro tália • Eustélé bez pryskyř. Kanálků, atypické tracheje Welwitschia mirabilis •Namib • Hromada hadrů • EtéExtrémn í suc ho • Až 2000 let Ginkgophyta jinany Ginkgophyta • Nahosemenné druhotně tlopustnoucí dřeviny • Vějiřovitá žilnatina • Listy mikrofilního původu • Vrchol ve druhohorách •Evolučně spojené s Cordaity? • Podstatná složka stravy dinosaurů Ginkgophyta - sex • DdéDvoudomé •Pyl je při vysychání ppyolynační kappyky vtahován do pylové komory. • Uvnitř vyklíčené pylové láčky dva polyciliátní spermatoz oidy • (u cykasů a jinanů se s nimi setkáváme naposledy) • oplození vaječné buňky až po odpadnutí semene na zem Ginkgophyta – generativní orgány Ginkgo biloba •JV Čína • Vyhynulý? • V ku ltivaci po celé m světě -
"National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment. -
State of New York City's Plants 2018
STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species. -
VMG Kentucky Bluegrass Revised 2017
Vol.1, No. 28 (Rev.). Approved 05/26/2017 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) SPECIES CHARACTER DESCRIPTION Kentucky bluegrass is a perennial grass that may form a dense mat of short creeping rhizomes. Leaves are usually smooth, 0.08-0.4 inches (2-9 mm) wide, up to 15.8 inches (40 cm) long, flat to folded, with a boat-shaped tip. Sheaths surrounding the flowering stalk are rounded or flattened with ligules 0.03-0.2 inches (1-5 mm) long. Stems are numerous in a tuft and grow 12-36 inches (30-91 cm) high. The erect panicles are up to 36 inches (1 m) tall and pyramidal at top with distinct whorls of branches in the inflorescence. Flowers occur in oval spikelets from 0.1-0.2 inches (3-6 mm long) with three to six individual flowers in each spikelet. Bluegrasses (the genus Poa) are distinguished by their flat leaf blades, 2-6 flowered panicles, 1-3 nerved glumes (sterile scales at the base of a spikelet) and a tuft of cobwebby hairs at the base of the 5-nerved lemmas (small scales at the base of a floret). Grasses, in general, are fairly difficult to identify, and Kentucky bluegrass should be accurately identified before attempting any control measures. If identification of the species is in doubt, the plant's identity should be confirmed by a knowledgeable individual and/or by consulting appropriate manuals or keys. DISTRIBUTION Kentucky bluegrass occurs throughout Canada and south to Mexico. It is widespread in the United States, occurring in all 50 states, but is less common in the South. -
Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa Pratensis) DESCRIPTION: Originally from Europe (Not Kentucky), This Plant Is the Primary Component of Most Lawns
Weed Identification and Control Sheet: www.goodoak.com/weeds Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis) DESCRIPTION: Originally from Europe (not Kentucky), this plant is the primary component of most lawns. Aside from corn, this may now be the most common grass in the eastern United States due to its dominance of our human landscape. This species often escapes cultivation and can be a problematic invasive species in our natural areas. Considerable time and resources are invested into maintaining this species in residential and corporate landscapes. Irrigating lawns uses up to 30% of municipal water supplies; this waste puts our long term supply of clean fresh water at risk. Pesticides, herbicides and petro- chemical fertilizers are spread on lawns at ten times the rate they are applied to agricultural lands. As a result, lawns are the primary source of pollution in lakes, streams and groundwater in urban and suburban areas. Exhaust from mowers and trimmers cause up to 33% of air pollution in urban areas. Lastly, these low mown lawns provide no habitat for our native wildlife, and as a result urban development is a leading cause of habitat loss. IDENTIFICATION: Though most people see this plant just about every day, few people look at it closely. Since there are often other non-native species of grasses in lawns, such as fescue, a few distinct features can help you tell Kentucky bluegrass apart when necessary. When not mown off, the leaf tips look like the front end or “keel” of a boat. Only grasses in the genus Poa have this feature. Also, when Kentucky bluegrass is not mown it will develop a distinctive panicle of small, green, wind- pollinated flowers. -
Updated Checklist of Poa in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands
A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 103: 27–60Updated (2018) checklist of Poa in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands 27 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.103.26029 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Updated checklist of Poa in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands Ana Ortega-Olivencia1, Juan A. Devesa2 1 Área de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, Avenida de Elvas, s.n., 06006 Badajoz, Spain 2 Departamento de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Edificio José Celestino Mutis, Ctra. de Madrid km. 396 A, 14014 Córdoba, Spain Corresponding author: Ana Ortega-Olivencia ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Nobis | Received 20 April 2018 | Accepted 27 June 2018 | Published 10 July 2018 Citation: Ortega-Olivencia A, Devesa JA (2018) Updated checklist of Poa in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. PhytoKeys 103: 27–60. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.103.26029 Abstract Based on our study of 4,845 herbarium sheets of the genus Poa from the area covered by Flora iberica, namely, the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands, we recognise 24 taxa (17 species, 1 subspecies and 8 varieties), mostly perennials. Most of these taxa have wide global and/or European distributions, while two (P. legionensis and P. minor subsp. nevadensis) are Spanish endemics and two have restricted distribu- tions (P. ligulata, Iberia–North Africa; P. flaccidula, Iberia–North Africa and the Balearic Islands, extend- ing to Provence, France). We have studied the original publications of more than 225 names considered as synonyms, with those more historically cited in Flora iberica taken into account in this paper; a total of 26 are new synonyms. -
National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt. -
Plant Fact Sheet for Pine Bluegrass (Poa Secunda)
Plant Fact Sheet secunda as it occurs west of the Cascades in the PINE BLUEGRASS Pacific Northwest. Poa secunda J. Presl Uses: Pine bluegrass is a native cool season plant symbol = POSE bunchgrass of small to moderate stature useful for restoration of upland meadows, wet prairies, and pine Contributed by: USDA NRCS Plant Materials Center, or oak savanna, depending on region. While slow to Corvallis, Oregon establish, it is drought tolerant and useful for dry, rocky outcrops as well as moist, slower draining sites. Other uses include revegetation, rehabilitation after wildfire, erosion control in mixes with other grasses, upland bird habitat (nesting cover, source of seed), and natural area landscaping. Specific information on livestock and wildlife utilization of pine bluegrass west of the Cascades is lacking. However, on drier western rangelands, ecotypes within the Poa secunda complex have value for livestock grazing and big game forage, especially in early spring. Palatability prior to dormancy and again in fall is rated fair to good for most ungulates, small mammals, and certain birds. Productivity can be low, especially in dry years. Potential uses that need further testing west of the Cascades are low input lawns and cover crops in vineyards or other horticultural crops where its early summer dormancy may be beneficial. Description: Pine bluegrass is a fine textured, short to medium lived, strongly tufted perennial grass with erect culms (stems) 40-100 cm tall. Mature clumps are typically 10-16 cm wide and the foliage is light to medium green or slightly bluish, and mostly basal. Leaf blades are numerous, 1-2 mm wide, 5-22 cm long, flat to folded or rolled inward, and lax. -
Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal the Shady History of C4 Grasses Erika J
Phylogenetic analyses reveal the shady history of C4 grasses Erika J. Edwardsa,1 and Stephen A. Smithb aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912; and bNational Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Durham, NC 27705 Edited by Michael J. Donoghue, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved December 31, 2009 (received for review August 24, 2009) Grasslands cover more than 20% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, has provided a strong selection pressure for C4 evolution in and their rise to dominance is one of the most dramatic events of eudicots (4). Grasses have long been viewed as an interesting biome evolution in Earth history. Grasses possess two main photo- exception to this pattern (9). Significant positive correlations synthetic pathways: the C3 pathway that is typical of most plants between C4 grass abundance and growing season temperature and a specialized C4 pathway that minimizes photorespiration and have been documented at both continental and regional scales thus increases photosynthetic performance in high-temperature (10–13); C4 grasses dominate tropical grasslands and savannas and/or low-CO2 environments. C4 grasses dominate tropical and but are virtually absent from cool-temperate grasslands and subtropical grasslands and savannas, and C3 grasses dominate the steppes. Furthermore, both experimental measurements of world's cooler temperate grassland regions. This striking pattern photosynthetic light use efficiency (termed “quantum yield”), has been attributed to C4 physiology, with the implication that the and predictions of leaf models of C3 and C4 photosynthesis evolution of the pathway enabled C4 grasses to persist in warmer provide strong evidence that C4 grasses outperform C3 grasses at climates than their C3 relatives. -
1 Anleitung Für Die Geographische Artendatenbank Nachdem Sie Die
Anleitung für die geographische Artendatenbank Nachdem Sie die Anwendung gestartet haben, können Sie mit den entsprechenden Werkzeugen zur gewünschten geographischen Lage finden. Im linken Auswahlmenü wählen Sie bitte "Artenfunde digitalisieren". Mit dem Button können Sie einen Punkt in die Karte setzen. Bitte beachten Sie unbedingt, dass bevor ein Punkt gesetzt wird alles geladen ist. Es müssen ungefähr 1,4 MB (Artenliste mit ca. 19.000 Arten) geladen werden. Links erscheint dann ein Disketten Symbol . Nach klick auf das Symbol erscheint ein Fenster, in dem die erforderlichen Angaben einzutragen sind. Die Felder bis „Ort des Fundes“ sind Pflichtfelder, hier müssen unbedingt Eingaben gemacht werden. 1 Die Eingabe über Autor und E-Mail des Autors sowie Bemerkungen sollten ebenso eingegeben werden. Diese Angaben werden in der Datenbank gespeichert, jedoch nicht veröffentlicht. Diese Angaben dienen intern dazu, die Wertigkeit der Eingaben beurteilen zu können. Es stehen z.B. beim "Artenname" Pulldown-Listen zur Verfügung, dadurch wird eine einheitliche Eingabe garantiert. Es stehen ca. 19.000 Arten zur Verfügung. Sollte es für eine Art keinen deutschen Namen geben, steht der wissenschaftliche Name zur Verfügung. Die Liste ist alphabetisch sortiert. Außerdem werden in der Liste keine ü,ö,ä und ß verwendet. Die Namen werden mit Umlauten geschrieben. Die vollständige Liste finden Sie im Anhang zu dieser Anleitung. Das Datum ist im Format JJJJ-MM-TT (z.B. 2012-01-27) einzugeben. Das wäre der 27. Januar 2012. Beenden Sie alle Eingaben durch drücken auf "Speichern". Während Ihrer aktuellen Internetsitzung haben Sie die Möglichkeit mit dem Button die Eingabe des Datensatzes wieder aus der Datenbank zu löschen. -
Floristic Quality Assessment Report
FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.