DOCSLIB.ORG

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE on HEALTH PUBLIC HEARING Legislation to Allow Adoptees to Access Their Origi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE on HEALTH PUBLIC HEARING Legislation to Allow Adoptees to Access Their Origi NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON HEALTH PUBLIC HEARING Legislation To Allow Adoptees To Access Their Original Birth Certificate New York City Room 1923 250 Broadway January 31, 2014 10:00 am. - 4:12 p.m. Page 2 Standing Committee on Health, January 31, 2014 ASSEMBLY MEMBERS PRESENT: ASSEMBLY MEMBER RICHARD GOTTFRIED, CHAIR, ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON HEALTH ASSEMBLY MEMBER DAVID WEPRIN ASSEMBLY MEMBER CHARLES LAVINE ASSEMBLY MEMBER JOSEPH BORELLI Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38 th Street, 10 th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 3 Standing Committee on Health, January 31, 2014 INDEX John M. Czygier, Jr. 10 Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County Panel: Kathleen Rice 35 Nassau County District Attorney Eric Phillips Assistant Ellen Mohr 36 Aaron Britvan, Esq. 42 Chairperson of the Adoption Committee Family Law Section NYS Bar Association Panel: Joyce Bahr 63 President, New York Statewide Adoption Reform’s Unsealed Initiative Ellyn Essig, Esq Legal Advisor (Accompanied by: Michael Schoer, Brooklyn & Staten Island Coordinator; Larry Dell, PR Director; Jeff Hancock, Regional Director, Western NY; and Marsha Raffloer, Long Island Coordinator, and Dennis Sumlin) Hon. Peter Kelly 70 Surrogate’s Court, Queens County Executive Chair, NYS Surrogates Association Adam Pertman 90 President Donaldson Adoption Institute Dana Stallard, LCSW 107 Spence Chapin Adoption Service Professor Elizabeth Samuels 114 Baltimore School of Law Researcher on Sealed Birth Certificates Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38 th Street, 10 th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 4 Standing Committee on Health, January 31, 2014 Peter W. Franklin RPh 129 Adoptees Without Liberty (AWOL) Joe Soll, LCSW 135 Psychotherapist Adoption Healing, Inc. Dr. Judy Kelly, PhD, LMHC 140 Doris Bertocci, LCSW 150 Clinical Social Worker/Therapist Leanne Jaffe, MA, LCSW 163 Psychotherapist/Consultant Adapting to Adoption Lorraine Dusky 180 Nancy Horgan 199 Michelle Wadowski 210 Facilitator Manhattan Birth Parents Support Group Panel: Jane Acton 212 Elsa Chung 224 Maureen Sheridan 230 Mary Anne Devine 242 Cindy Garet Sippin 249 Joe Brandt 261 Joe Pessalono 265 Carla Marie Rupp 270 James Lane 272 Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38 th Street, 10 th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 5 Standing Committee on Health, January 31, 2014 Rod Shinners 295 Panel: Theresa Stanton 302 Ron Stanton 302 Michael Schoer 310 Brooklyn & Staten Island Coordinator New York Statewide Adoption Reform’s Unsealed Initiative Pat O’Brien 318 President New York State Citizens Coalition for Children Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38 th Street, 10 th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 6 1 Standing Committee on Health, January 31, 2014 2 (The public hearing commenced at 10:00 3 a.m.) 4 ASSEMBLY MEMBER RICHARD GOTTFRIED, 5 CHAIR, ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH: Okay, if 6 people could take their seats, we will begin, 7 we've got a long day. I'm Richard Gottfried, I 8 chair the Health Committee in the New York State 9 Assembly. I want to start off by wishing 10 everyone a Happy New Year. We are joined this 11 morning by two other members of the assembly 12 health committee, Charles Lavine and Joe, Joseph 13 Borelli, and also by David Weprin, assembly 14 member David Weprin who is the sponsor of the 15 bill that is the subject of the hearing. 16 A few procedural announcements, as is 17 the long-standing practice of the Health 18 Committee, all witnesses will be testifying under 19 oath; what that means is when you come up, take 20 your seat, I will ask you if you swear or affirm 21 that the testimony you are about to give is true 22 and if you say yes, you get to testify. For the 23 benefit of the, of the recording mechanism, and 24 ultimately the making of a transcript, if you Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38 th Street, 10 th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 7 1 Standing Committee on Health, January 31, 2014 2 could before you begin clearly state your name. 3 We will be going straight through, at some point 4 in mid-day we will take about a ten minute break 5 for, for what in the health world we call 6 ambulation and toileting, but other than that we 7 will be going straight through. We have a lot of 8 witnesses, and let me just say to the witnesses, 9 we definitely want to hear what everyone has to 10 say but in order to enable everyone to have their 11 say before nightfall, if others have made points 12 the same as or similar to yours feel free to say, 13 I agree with so-and-so or I agree with all of the 14 people who have said, whatever. And to the 15 extent you can do that that will help move things 16 along for everyone here today. 17 I'm not going to make an opening 18 statement, I know Mr. Weprin wants to say a 19 couple of words, do either or you folks want to 20 say anything? 21 ASSEMBLY MEMBER CHARLES LAVINE: No, but 22 thank you. 23 ASSEMBLY MEMBER GOTTFRIED: Okay, David? 24 ASSEMBLY MEMBER DAVID WEPRIN: Thank Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38 th Street, 10 th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 8 1 Standing Committee on Health, January 31, 2014 2 you, Chairman Gottfried. I want to start off by 3 thanking the health committee chairman, Richard 4 Gottfried, for holding this hearing. This has 5 been a piece of legislation that's been around 6 the legislature for many, many years, although 7 it's gotten significant momentum in the last 8 couple years and I don't think we've ever had a 9 public hearing, that I know of, on this piece of 10 legislation. So I want to start off by thanking 11 Chairman Gottfried for bringing this hearing 12 today and, of course, as well as Speaker Sheldon 13 Silver, for bringing this hearing today. 14 We now have over 80 sponsors of a bill 15 that I call the Adoptee Bill of Rights. It only 16 takes 76 sponsors to pass a bill in the assembly, 17 it is a bipartisan sponsorship, we have a 18 significant number of republicans as well as 19 democrats and Senator Andrew Lanza is now the 20 prime sponsor of a companion bill in the senate 21 also known as the Adoptee Bill of Rights, which 22 allows adult adoptce -- adoptees access to their 23 original birth certificate and medical history to 24 treat illness related to family history and Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38 th Street, 10 th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 9 1 Standing Committee on Health, January 31, 2014 2 genetics. Amending the existing New York 3 adoption law will provide adult adoptees with the 4 same access to information that a non-adopted 5 person has the legal right to obtain. No one, in 6 my opinion, should be denied the right to obtain 7 information about themselves concerning their 8 medical history and ethnicity and it is 9 unacceptable that adult adoptees are the only 10 group of citizens in New York State that are 11 unable to obtain their birth and family medical 12 records. 13 When several diseases and preventative 14 care treatments are linked to family history and 15 genetics, it is imperative that adoptees are able 16 to receive access to the hereditary history so 17 that medical professionals are given all of the 18 necessary information to cure potentially life- 19 threatening illnesses. As a prime sponsor of the 20 Adoptee Bill of Rights, and on behalf of all of 21 the New Yorkers waiting to acquire a copy of 22 their birth certificate and family history, we 23 look forward to hearing testimony from all of the 24 health professionals, adoptees, advocacy groups, Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38 th Street, 10 th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 10 1 Standing Committee on Health, January 31, 2014 2 lawyers, civic organizations, veterans, and 3 constituents affected by this issue throughout 4 the State of New York. Thank you. 5 ASSEMBLY MEMBER GOTTFRIED: Thank you. 6 We will now proceed to our first witness, John 7 Czygier, who is the surrogate court judge of 8 Suffolk county. While Judge Czygier is coming 9 up, I just want to express again my, my apology 10 for the fact that because of an error in my 11 office, there were several people who did not get 12 early notification of this hearing and I'm glad, 13 Judge, you are able to be here. I, because I 14 think it's very important that we hear your 15 views. 16 JUDGE JOHN M. CZYGIER, JR., SURROGATE's 17 COURT, SUFFOLK, COUNTY: Alright, thank you, 18 again, thank you. 19 ASSEMBLY MEMBER GOTTFRIED: Oh, and do 20 you swear or affirm -- 21 JUDGE CZYGIER: Oh. 22 ASSEMBLY MEMBER GOTTFRIED: -- that the 23 testimony you are about to give is true? 24 JUDGE CZYGIER: Yes, I do. Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38 th Street, 10 th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 11 1 Standing Committee on Health, January 31, 2014 2 ASSEMBLY MEMBER GOTTFRIED: Thank you. 3 JUDGE CZYGIER: Again, thank you for the 4 opportunity of allowing me to be here, 5 notwithstanding the short notice, I'll try and 6 put together a presentation that will be brief 7 and to the point. In fact, I did ask that this 8 be adjourned but apparently this has been long- 9 planned, okay, not, not that we knew about it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Openness in International Adoption
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 3-2015 Openness in International Adoption Malinda L. Seymore Texas A&M University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Family Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Malinda L. Seymore, Openness in International Adoption, 46 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 163 (2015). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/707 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OPENNESS IN INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION Malinda L. Seymore* ABSTRACT After a long history of secrecy in domestic adoption in the United States, there is a robust trend toward openness. That is, however, not the case with internationaladoption. The recent growth in international adoption has been spurred, at least in part, by the desire of adoptive parents to return to closed, confidential adoptions where the identity of the birth mother is secret and there is no ongoing contact with her. There is, however, an emergent interest in increased openness in internationaladoption, spurred by the success of domestic open adoptions, health concerns when an adoptee's genetic history is important, psychological issues relating to identity in adoptees, and concern that the international adoption might have been corrupt. International adoptive families who were once happy to avoid birth parent involvement have begun to seek them out.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia's Adoption Statute: a History of a Work in Progress Lisa Kelly University of Washington School of Law
    University of Washington School of Law UW Law Digital Commons Articles Faculty Publications 1999 West Virginia's Adoption Statute: A History of a Work in Progress Lisa Kelly University of Washington School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Lisa Kelly, West Virginia's Adoption Statute: A History of a Work in Progress, 102 W. Va. L. Rev. 1 (1999), https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/316 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WEST VIRGINIA'S ADOPTION STATUTE: THE HISTORY OF A WORK IN PROGRESS Lisa Kelly I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................2 11. THE JOURNEY TO WEST VIRGINIA'S CURRENT ADOPTION STATUTE ................................................ •5 A The Pre-1997 West VirginiaAdoption Statute .................5 B. The West VirginiaLaw InstituteSteps In .............................11 1. The History of the West VirginiaLaw Institute's Adoption Reform Project.......................................... 11 2. The West VirginiaLaw Institute'sProposed Reforms ....................................................................14 a. The West VirginiaLaw Institute's Notice and Consent Procedure.......................................... 15 b.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia's Adoption Statute: the History of a Work in Progress
    Volume 102 Issue 1 Article 4 September 1999 West Virginia's Adoption Statute: The History of a Work in Progress Lisa Kelly West Virginia University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Lisa Kelly, West Virginia's Adoption Statute: The History of a Work in Progress, 102 W. Va. L. Rev. (1999). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol102/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kelly: West Virginia's Adoption Statute: The History of a Work in Progre WEST VIRGINIA'S ADOPTION STATUTE: THE HISTORY OF A WORK IN PROGRESS Lisa Kelly I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................2 11. THE JOURNEY TO WEST VIRGINIA'S CURRENT ADOPTION STATUTE ................................................ •5 A The Pre-1997 West VirginiaAdoption Statute .................5 B. The West VirginiaLaw InstituteSteps In .............................11 1. The History of the West VirginiaLaw Institute's Adoption Reform Project.......................................... 11 2. The West VirginiaLaw Institute'sProposed Reforms ....................................................................14 a. The West VirginiaLaw Institute's Notice and Consent Procedure.......................................... 15 b. The West VirginiaLaw Institute Addresses the Problem ofthe "Unknown Father".............. 22 c. The West VirginiaLaw Institute Defines PresumptiveAbandonment ..............................25 d. WVLI Opens the Door - Just a Crack- to Open Adoption .................................................28 e. The Institute'sAttempt to Bring Clarity to ProperAdoption Expenses ..............................34 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Class, Shame, and Identity in Memoirs About Difficult Same-Race Adoptions by Jeremy Harding and Lori Jakiela
    genealogy Article Class, Shame, and Identity in Memoirs about Difficult Same-Race Adoptions by Jeremy Harding and Lori Jakiela Marianne Novy Department of English, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; [email protected] Received: 25 June 2018; Accepted: 31 July 2018; Published: 6 August 2018 Abstract: This paper will discuss two search memoirs with widely divergent results by British Jeremy Harding and American Lori Jakiela, in which the memoirists recount discoveries about their adoptive parents, as well as their birth parents. While in both cases the adoptions are same-race, both provide material for analysis of class and class mobility. Both searchers discover that the adoption, in more blatant ways than usual, was aimed at improving the parents’ lives—impressing a rich relative or distracting from the trauma of past sexual abuse—rather than benefiting the adoptee. They also discover the importance of various kinds of shame: for example, Harding discovers that his adoptive mother hid the close connection that she had had with his birthmother, because she was trying to rise in class. Jakiela imagines the humiliation her birthmother experienced as she tries to understand her resistance to reunion. Both memoirists recall much childhood conflict with their adoptive parents but speculate about how much of their personalities come from their influence. Both narrate changes in their attitudes about their adoption; neither one settles for a simple choice of either adoptive or birth identity. Contrasts in their memoirs relate especially to gender, nation, class, and attitudes to fictions. Keywords: adoption; search memoir; identity; adoptive parents; class; shame; secrecy; birthmother; orphanage; Irishness; immigration; Jeremy Harding; Lori Jakiela 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Activereports Document
    HOUSE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC HEALTH Hearing Date: March 17, 2021 8:00 AM Printed on: March 18, 2021 5:45 PM COMMENTS FOR: HB 1386 Alison Macor SELF Austin, TX As a close friend of several adult adoptees and a parent who pursued adoption before becoming pregnant myself, I think it’s imperative that this bill be passed to allow equal access to original birth certificates for all adult adoptees. Years ago I had the honor of being asked to help a close friend contact her birth parents after she did lengthy (and costly) research to identify and locate them. It was a powerful experience to be part of something so important and potentially life-changing—for everyone. I can’t imagine such an emotional process being made more difficult by restricting or needlessly complicating the steps to obtain one’s original birth certificate. As the Committee on Public Health considers HB 1386, I’d like to request that all representatives vote YES in committee. Sincerely, Alison Macor Matthew Wade Self Forney, TX Adopted adults should have access to any and all records relating to their personal and medical history. These are legal documents and there is no reason that an adult should be restricted from them. From a medical standpoint, not having access to this information could pose a potential issue with treatments and screenings for illness or disease. On the personal side, any adults should be able to access and view all of their personal information, regardless of what that might be. It is their information, and they should have every right that any other adult would have.
    [Show full text]
  • DHHSADM-81-1094 PUB DATE 81 CONTRACT NIMH-80-M-028176101D NOTE 149P
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 216 294 CG 015 978 AUTHOR Rim, S. Peter TITLE Special Adoptions: An Annotated Bibliography on Transracial, Transcultural, and Nonconventional Adoption, and Minority Children. For Mental Health, Health, and Human Services Professionals. INSTITUTION American Academy of Child Psychiatry, Washington, D.C. SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Mental Health (DHHS), Bethesda, Md. REPORT NO DHHSADM-81-1094 PUB DATE 81 CONTRACT NIMH-80-M-028176101D NOTE 149p. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Adopted Children; *Adoption; Annotated Bibliographies; Child Development; Counselor Role; Delivery Systems; *Emotional Adjustment; Intercultural Programs; *Minority Group Children; Parent Child Relationship; *Social Services; *Stress Variables ABSTRACT This annotated bibliography reflects the changing patterns of adoption and includes a general discussion of adoption trends and legislation and the role of social selice agencies in providing for the welfare of all children; Specific topics include adOption of black, Indian, American Indian, Eskimo, Oriental, Puerto Rican, Mexican and hard-to-place children (older or handicapped children). Social attitudes, parent-child relationships, adjustment, health, and development are considered. Research articles are also presented that deal with stress and cultural identity. (JAC) **********o**********************************t:************************* Reproductions supplied-by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** 4' U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION P NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION C\L CENTER (ERIC) LI This document has been 0 reproduced as received from the person ororganization onginating it *Nom changeshave been made to improve CV reproduction Quality. CZ) Points of view or opinions statedin Nis docu- ment do not necessanly represent official LW NIE POtotion or policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoptee Access to Original Birth Certificates and the Politics of Birthmotherhood in Ohio, 1963-2014
    Adoptee Access to Original Birth Certificates and the Politics of Birthmotherhood in Ohio, 1963-2014 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Katherine Grace Livingston, M.A. Graduate Program in Women’s, Gender & Sexuality Studies The Ohio State University 2016 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Cynthia Burack, Advisor Dr. Wendy Smooth Dr. Mary Thomas Copyright by Katherine Grace Livingston 2016 Abstract The experiences of women who place children for adoption have been historically excluded from mainstream and feminist scholarship on reproductive politics. Similarly, scholars of adoption have insufficiently accounted for the impact of contemporary political movements for and against abortion on the discourses, institutions and relations of power that shape the experiences of these women, popularly known as birthmothers. Bridging that gap in scholarship, this dissertation addresses the ways in which political struggles over abortion rights influence adoption law and shape the way birthmothers are represented in public policy discussions. This dissertation project investigates the legislative and political history of major policy debates in the State of Ohio from 1963 to 2014 concerning the rights of adult adoptees to access their original birth certificates. Situating these debates in Ohio within a larger body of scholarship on U.S. adoption law and policy, I map a legislative and political history of pro-life interventions in this area of adoption policy. I examine this history with an eye toward how ideas about birthmothers’ sexual, reproductive and maternal lives are consolidated into political narratives about birthmothers. In particular, I am interested in the ways in which policy actors develop arguments against adoptee access that rely on political narratives about birthmothers’ identities, experiences and agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaid C Reyes Kipp-Final Dissertation-FINAL
    ADOPTION BUREAUCRACIES: EXPERT KNOWLEDGE, DOCUMENTS AND RACE IN THE MAKING OF ADOPTIVE FAMILIES IN CENTRAL MEXICO by Anaid Citlalli Reyes Kipp A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland October, 2014 © 2014 Anaid Citlalli Reyes Kipp All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the bureaucratic, legal and administrative practices of the neoliberal state through an ethnographic account of the Mexican government’s recent attempts to regulate and create adoptive families. With the Mexican state’s adherence to international adoption conventions and the recent shift towards the right in Mexican politics, federal and state-level governments have adjusted existing codes to facilitate the “plenary adoption” of poor children by state approved families beginning in the 1990s. The reforms, which define “plenary adoption” as the creation of a new family by extinguishing all the previous kinship ties of the adopted child, mark a move away from earlier “simple adoption” provisions, in which adoption was defined as a contract between two individuals that could be revoked. Paying special attention to the material production of knowledge–as well as the legal and moral discourses that it entails– the dissertation explores how adoption becomes a technology of government with particular racialized effects, and investigates the multiple possibilities of relatedness that are made available or foreclosed through plenary adoption policies and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Laundering As Exploitation: Applying Anti- Trafficking Norms to Intercountry Adoption Under the Coming Hague Regime David M
    Samford University From the SelectedWorks of David M. Smolin March, 2007 Child Laundering As Exploitation: Applying Anti- Trafficking Norms to Intercountry Adoption Under the Coming Hague Regime David M. Smolin Available at: https://works.bepress.com/david_smolin/4/ CHILD LAUNDERING AS EXPLOITATION: APPLYING ANTI-TRAFFICKING NORMS TO INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION UNDER THE COMING HAGUE REGIME David M. Smolin* I. INTRODUCTION As the United States government continues its slow and long-delayed march toward ratification and implementation of the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption,1 the goals and rationale of that process remain obscure. The preamble to the Hague Convention indicates that the signatory nations are: AConvinced of the necessity to take measures to ensure that intercountry adoptions are made in the best interests of the child and with respect for his or her fundamental rights, and to prevent the abduction, the sale of, or traffic in children,@2 The substantive provisions of the Treaty reaffirm these concerns by stating that the Aobjects@ of the Convention are: a) to establish safeguards to ensure that intercountry adoptions take place in the best interests of the child and with respect for his or her fundamental rights as recognized in international law; b) to establish a system of co-operation amongst Contracting States to ensure that those 1 safeguards are respected and thereby prevent the abduction, the sale of, or traffic in children; c) to secure the recognition in Contracting States of adoptions made in accordance with the Convention.3 : The Hague Convention=s concern that adoptions not subvert the best interests and rights of children through the illicit practices of abducting, selling, and trafficking in children has found much resistance in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption Experiences and the Tracing and Narration of Family Genealogies • Derek Kirton Adoption Experiences and the Tracing and Narration of Family Genealogies
    Adoption Experiences and and the Narration Tracing Genealogies of Family Adoption Experiences and • Derek Kirton the Tracing and Narration of Family Genealogies Edited by Derek Kirton Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Genealogy www.mdpi.com/journal/genealogy Adoption Experiences and the Tracing and Narration of Family Genealogies Adoption Experiences and the Tracing and Narration of Family Genealogies Special Issue Editor Derek Kirton MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Special Issue Editor Derek Kirton University of Kent UK Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Genealogy (ISSN 2313-5778) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genealogy/special issues/adoption). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03928-718-5 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03928-719-2 (PDF) c 2020 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Special Issue Editor ...................................... vii Preface to ”Adoption Experiences and the Tracing and Narration of Family Genealogies” ..
    [Show full text]
  • Child Laundering As Exploitation: Applying Anti-Trafficking Norms to Intercountry Adoption Under the Coming Hague Regime
    CHILD LAUNDERING AS EXPLOITATION: APPLYING ANTI-TRAFFICKING NORMS TO INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION UNDER THE COMING HAGUE REGIME David M. Smolin*† INTRODUCTION As the United States government continues its slow and long-delayed march toward ratification and implementation of the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption,1 the goals and rationale of that process remain obscure. The preamble to the Hague Convention indicates that the signatory nations are “convinced of the necessity to take measures to ensure that intercountry adoptions are made in the best interests of the child and with respect for his or her fundamental rights, and to prevent the abduction, the sale of, or traffic in children.”2 The substantive provisions of the treaty reaffirm these concerns by stating that the objects of the Convention are: (a) to establish safeguards to ensure that intercountry adoptions take place in the best interests of the child and with respect for his or her fundamental rights as recognized in international law; (b) to establish a system of co-operation amongst Contracting States to ensure that those safeguards are respected and thereby prevent the abduction, the sale of, or traffic in children; (c) to secure the recognition in Contracting States of adoptions made in accordance with the Convention.3 The Hague Convention’s concern that adoptions not subvert the best * Professor of Law, Cumberland School of Law, Samford University; Director, Center for Biotechnology, Law and Ethics; J.D. 1986, University of Cincinnati College of Law; B.A. 1980 New College of the University of South Florida. † The author wishes to acknowledge first the assistance of Desiree Smolin, with whom I have worked on adoption reform issues, and whose insights have been critical to the development of my own thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • February 29, 2016 Re: Support for SB2153 To: Honorable Members Of
    February 29, 2016 Re: Support for SB2153 To: Honorable Members of the Hawaii Senate Judiciary Committee The National Center on Adoption and Permanency (NCAP) is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit educational organization dedicated to improving laws, policies and practices – based on the best available research and experience – so that they enable all children and their families to succeed. This correspondence, along with the accompanying written testimony, is intended to explain the state of professional knowledge on a key issue in our field: the availability (or lack thereof) of original birth certificates and related adoption documents to adopted persons once they reach the age of majority. I will keep this letter brief, as I’m sure you already have received a great amount of information from all sides. On behalf of NCAP, I can provide any additional data you might need or want, would be delighted to address any questions you encounter, and am also submitting more-detailed, research-based testimony (separate document). In short, research consistently shows that sealed adoption records are an anachronism born of society’s desire to protect the reputations of adoptees and their adoptive families at a time when unwed mothers were severely stigmatized and the children born to them were denigrated as “bastards.” Indeed, birth certificates were often stamped with the word “illegitimate.” Over time, the cultural rationale has shifted to maintaining the anonymity of first/ birth mothers. However, nearly all available evidence indicates that these women – while sometimes wanting privacy in their families and not wanting their situations to become public – overwhelmingly desire some level of contact with or knowledge about the children they bore; that they favor adoptee access to their own records (or, at least, do not oppose it); and, contrary to popular perception, that they were not legally assured of anonymity.
    [Show full text]