DOCSLIB.ORG

Ford Calumet Environmental Center Feasibility Study Working Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ford Calumet Environmental Center Feasibility Study Working Group 94 Peterson Ave. 90 Montrose Ave. Belmont Ave. 94 Lincoln Park FORDFullerton Ave. CALUMET Humboldt ENVIRONMENTALDivision St. Park Lake St. Garfield Jackson Blvd. Park Columbus Grant Park 290 Park Roosevelt Rd. CENTER DouglasFEASIBILITY90 Northerly Park Island Cermak Rd. STUDY31st St. CICERO Pershing Rd. 55 47th St. CHICAGO 55th St. Washington LAKE MICHIGAN Park Midway International Jackson Airport Park 63rd St. Marquette Park 79th St. 94 90 Dan Ryan 87th St. OAK Woods LAWN VAN Vlissingen 95th St. LAKE CALUMET - PRAIRIE 103rd St. WEST 111th St. BIG MARSH 294 57 Cal Sag Rd. - EAST BLUE Wolf LAKE CALUMET Lake 127th St. ISLAND HEGEWISCH Whistler Cal-Sag Channel Woods Little Calumet River Beaubien MARSH Woods 135th St. Calumet Woods Burnham Burnham Rubio Woods Woods Kickapoo Prairie 143rd St. Meadows 151st St. Sand Ridge Midlothian Nature Meadows Preserve 159th St. Nelson Woods SOUTH St. Mihiel 57 167th St. Reservation HOLLAND 80 94 JUNE 5, 2015 Yankee Woods Wampum Lake Woods 80 INDIANA ILLINOIS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS FORD CALUMET ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY WORKING GROUP Diane Banta National Park Service Mark Bouman The Field Museum Suellen Burns Illinois Department Of Natural Resources Louise Clemency United States Fish And Wildlife Service David Doig Chicago Neighborhoods Initiative Mollie Dowling OAI Matthew Freer Chicago Park District Kindy Kruller Forest Preserve District Of Cook County Laura Milkert The Field Museum Cynthia Moreno Forest Preserve District Of Cook County Sarah Neville Alliance For The Great Lakes Alison Paul The Field Museum Arthur Pearson Gaylord And Dorothy Donnelly Foundation Carina Ruiz Student Conservation Association Tom Shepherd Southeast Environmental Task Force Diane Tecic Illinois Department Of Natural Resources Lauren Umek Chicago Park District Zhanna Yermakov Chicago Park District THE SEARLE FUNDS AT THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY TRUST PREPARED BY: Primera Engineers Bailey Edward Architects TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i ANALYZE 7. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES 69 INTRODUCTION 7.1 FACILITY APPROACH ALTERNATIVES 70 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 7.2 PREFERRED FACILITY APPROACH 72 FEASIBILITY STUDY PROCESS 3 7.3 PREFERRED SITE APPROACH 74 ENVISION ENGAGE 8. DESIGN STRATEGY 79 1. STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS 7 8.1 CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES 80 1.1 REGIONAL LAND OWNERS AND MANAGERS AND 8 8.2 FACILITY DESIGN SCRIPT 82 IMPLEMENTATION PARTNERS 8.3 BUILDING PROGRAM 84 1.2 POTENTIAL USER GROUPS 11 8.4 SITE PROGRAM 88 1.3 OTHER PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS 13 8.5 SCHEMATIC GATEWAY CENTER CAPITAL BUDGET 90 2. PROJECT HISTORY 15 2.1 THE BEST NEST SITE 17 CONCLUSION 93 2.3 THE BEST NEST BUILDING 18 2.4 THE BEST NEST PROGRAMMING AND OPERATIONS 19 2.5 IMPLEMENTATION COSTS AND FUNDRAISING EFFORTS 20 APPENDIX 2.5 2012 RE-EVALUATION 21 3. 2015 CONTEXT 23 3.1 ACCESS AND TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES 25 3.1 REGIONAL OPEN SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 27 3.2 REGIONAL RECREATION RESOURCES 29 3.3 REGIONAL CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES 31 3.4 REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES 33 3.5 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES 35 4. POTENTIAL SITES 37 4.1 HEGEWISCH MARSH 38 4.2 BIG MARSH 42 4.3 VAN VLISSINGEN PRAIRIE 46 4.4 LAKE CALUMET - WEST AND LAKE CALUMET - EAST 50 5. COMPARABLE FACILITY ASSESSMENT 55 5.1 SAND RIDGE NATURE CENTER 56 5.2 WILLIAM POWERS STATE RECREATION AREA CENTER 57 5.3 GIBSON WOODS ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS CENTER 58 5.4 HAMMOND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER 59 5.5 NORTH PARK VILLAGE NATURE CENTER 60 5.6 URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER 61 6. DRAFT MISSION AND GOALS 63 6.1 SAND RIDGE NATURE CENTER 63 6.2 WILLIAM POWERS STATE RECREATION AREA CENTER 64 6.3 GIBSON WOODS ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS CENTER 65 Executive Summary IN SEPTEMBER 2013 THE MILLENNIUM RESERVE STEERING COMMITTEE (MILLENNIUM RESERVE SC) IDENTIFIED THE FORD CALUMET ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER AS ONE OF FOURTEEN PRIORITY INITIATIVES FOR THE MILLENNIUM RESERVE. FOLLOWING THE ANNOUNCEMENT, THE SEARLE FUNDS AT THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY TRUST OFFERED $35,000 IN FUNDING FOR A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOCUSED ON REVIVING THE PLANS FOR THE SOUTHEAST-SIDE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER. The Chicago Park District (CPD) was asked to lead and manage the Feasibility Study process along with A 18-member Working Group representing 12 organizations. In summer 2014, CPD engaged the Lakota Group, Primera Engineers, and Baily Edward Architects (Project Team) to complete the study. At the beginning of the assignment, the Project Team was asked to accomplish the following tasks: • Assess the need for an environmental center, engaging the community, local public and private schools, community-based organizations, and other organizations that manage environmental programming in the region. • Facilitate a discussion among partner organizations regarding the potential center’s mission, target audience, programming, and services. • Review Studio Gang Architects’ 2004 plan for the Ford Calumet Environmental Center and assess its feasibility within the context of existing resources. • Assess the feasibility of building a center on the southeast side within the context of existing resources. • Consider and analyze a range of options for the design of the center, and make a recommendation. The Project Team undertook the assignment in three phases: Engage, Analyze, and Envision. i ENGAGE The Engage phase focused on stakeholder outreach or invigorated National Heritage Areas, and the Cal- through personal interviews, focus-group discussions, and Sag Trail will help draw visitors to the region. a public open house engaging regional land owners and • Possible changes in land ownership and use open manager, implementation partners, potential users, and additional sites for consideration both west and east other project stakeholders. Over a period of 4 months, the of Lake Calumet and suggest possibilities for better Project Team spoke with over 100 different stakeholders, access and connectivity. representing a broad range of Calumet-region interests. • Growth in active recreation and eco-tourism open new Conversations with stakeholders revealed: possibilities, as well. • There are many interested and engaged stakeholders in the Calumet area. Potential Sites • There is a general frustration with the delay in • The recommended site should have numerous creating the FCEC, and a desire to see something environmental and recreational amenities to draw built. visitors in, and have the ability to accommodate • There is a recognized need for partnerships. active users that may pose risks to higher quality • Goals of FCEC should include environmental, environmental issues. economic, and cultural initiatives. • Accessibility in the region is challenging, but will • There is a need to create a gateway that will draw be essential to draw visitors from the disparate visitors through the region. communities and the region. • There is no agreement on a single best site. • Most stakeholders are open to rethinking how the Comparable Facility Approaches goals of the FCEC can be achieved by adapting the • There are a number of environmentally-focused facility’s design and site to work within the framework centers within relatively close proximity to the sites of existing resources and regional synergies. evaluated as candidates for the new facility. Despite the quantity of regional facilities, no one center During the Engage Phase the Project Team also prepared currently serves as a true gateway to the Calumet an existing conditions report, focused on understanding region. the project history and comparable regional facilities, and • Comparable facilities within the Chicagoland region identifying the current resources of the Calumet region. range in size from 2,000 SF to 5,000 SF. • Partnerships between agencies, not for profit Project History organizations, and even for-profit corporations lend • The FCEC was initially envisioned to cost $6 million in success to these types of facilities. construction plus another $6 million in programming • Locational synergies, such as proximity to other and maintenance. Only $7.6 million was available structured or unstructured recreation resources or for capital development at project outset, and by proximity to local neighborhoods lend success to these 2008 the construction document (CD) estimate for types of facilities. the award-winning SGA design was over $17 million. • Once a site and operator for the new facility The subsequent economic downturn and change in are selected, resources should be dedicated to administration further hampered fundraising efforts programming and operational planning to help ensure while construction costs continued to increase. success. • The passage of ten years has resulted in the project’s • Design consideration should also be given to the fact cost quadrupling its original estimate. that resources for programs and staff may not be • The award-winning SGA design is universally available from day one - and that the new facility may admired and at 39,000 SF, (28,000 sf in the interior need to support unstructured visitor participation in of the main building), included the capability to serve its infancy. many different needs. The private market did not find adequate incentive to fund the shortfall, but the Next, based on the community input and assessment of Loop Capital Management (LCM) study suggested existing resources, the Project Team and the Working the market may be willing to fund only programming- Group developed a draft mission for a new center and a related costs in a downsized facility. list of target users and programs for a new center. Early identification
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Great Rivers Confidential Draft Draft
    greatriverschicago.com OUR GREAT RIVERS CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT DRAFT A vision for the Chicago, Calumet and Des Plaines rivers TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments 2 Our Great Rivers: A vision for the Chicago, Calumet and Des Plaines rivers Letter from Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel 4 A report of Great Rivers Chicago, a project of the City of Chicago, Metropolitan Planning Council, Friends of the Chicago River, Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning and Ross Barney Architects, through generous Letter from the Great Rivers Chicago team 5 support from ArcelorMittal, The Boeing Company, The Chicago Community Trust, The Richard H. Driehaus Foundation and The Joyce Foundation. Executive summary 6 Published August 2016. Printed in Chicago by Mission Press, Inc. The Vision 8 greatriverschicago.com Inviting 11 Productive 29 PARTNERS Living 45 Vision in action 61 CONFIDENTIAL Des Plaines 63 Ashland 65 Collateral Channel 67 Goose Island 69 FUNDERS Riverdale 71 DRAFT DRAFT Moving forward 72 Our Great Rivers 75 Glossary 76 ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT OUR GREAT RIVERS 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This vision and action agenda for the Chicago, Calumet and Des Plaines rivers was produced by the Metropolitan Planning RESOURCE GROUP METROPOLITAN PLANNING Council (MPC), in close partnership with the City of Chicago Office of the Mayor, Friends of the Chicago River and Chicago COUNCIL STAFF Metropolitan Agency for Planning. Margaret Frisbie, Friends of the Chicago River Brad McConnell, Chicago Dept. of Planning and Co-Chair Development Josh Ellis, Director The Great Rivers Chicago Leadership Commission, more than 100 focus groups and an online survey that Friends of the Chicago River brought people to the Aaron Koch, City of Chicago Office of the Mayor Peter Mulvaney, West Monroe Partners appointed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel, and a Resource more than 3,800 people responded to.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to the Chicago Office
    Directions to the Chicago Office 70 W. Madison St. Suite 3100 Chicago, IL 60602 P: +1: 312.372.1121 Nearby Subways: CTA Blue train – exit at Dearborn & Monroe CTA Red train – exit at Monroe & State street CTA Green, Brown, Orange, Pink, Purple trains – exit Madison & Wabash Metra Electric, South Shore trains – exit at Millennium Station Metra Rock Island Train – exit at LaSalle street station Metra South West, Heritage Corridor, BNSF , Milwaukee West, North, North Central trains – exit at Union Station Metra Union Pacific North, Union Pacific West, Union Pacific NW trains – exit at Ogilvie Station Nearby Buses: CTA 14 Jeffrey Express, 19 United Center Express, 20 Madison, 20x Washington/Madison Express – stops in front of the building on Madison CTA 22 Clark, 24 Wentworth, 129 West Loop/South Loop ‐ stops on the corner of Clark and Madison CTA 22 Clark, 24 Wentworth, 36 Broadway, 52 Archer, 129 West Loop/South Loop‐ stops on the corner of Dearborn and Madison From O’Hare Airport – • Take I‐190 E ramp • Continue onto I‐90E (Kennedy expressway) for 13.6 miles • Exit 51H‐I (I‐290W, Eishenhower expressway) • Take exit 51I (Congress Pkwy, Chicago Loop) on the left • Continue onto W. Congress Pkwy • Take Wacker Drive (Franklin Street) exit on the right • Take Wacker Drive ramp on the left • Continue onto S Upper Wacker Drive • Turn right onto W. Monroe Street • Turn left onto S. Dearborn Street • Turn left onto W. Madison Street From Midway Airport – • Go south on IL‐50 S (S. Cicero Av) • Make a U‐turn onto IL‐50 N (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Managment Plan Final Copy 7-16-03
    The Woodlands Integrated Forestry Management Plan Prepared By: Burditt Associates 2040 Loop 336 W Suite 318 Conroe, TX 77304 November, 2000 Revised By: Community Associations of The Woodlands, TX Parks and Recreation Department April 2003 Adopted: May 2003 Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Methodology 7 Selective Site Descriptions 8 Findings 9 Site Findings 11 Historical Forest 38 The Woodlands Forest – A Rural Forest/Urban Forest Interface 42 Forest Management 44 Forest Management Primer 46 Forest Management Systems 48 Forest Health 50 Wildland/Urban Interface – Fire Hazard Assessment 52 Needs 54 Natural Resource Conditions 54 Needs Pertaining to Forest Health 58 Needs Pertaining to Undesirable Species 69 Needs Pertaining to Safety 70 Needs Pertaining to Wildlife 74 Recommendations 79 Community Awareness 80 Forest Management 83 Insects 95 Diseases 98 Reforestation 100 Drought 108 Invader Species 113 Hazard Issues 114 Park User Safety 126 Potential Fire Hazards 127 Wildlife Management 129 2 Fisheries Management 146 Conclusions and Action List 158 What’s Next? 159 Attachments 164 Glossary 165 Projected Cost 174 Projected Forestry Management Cost per Associations 175 Universal Data Sheet for Forest Inventory 176 Tree Removal Records 177 Guide to Judging Plant Condition 178 Guidelines for Managing Pine Pest 179 Literature Cited 180 Web Resources 182 Selected Site Map References 183 Power Point Presentation 3 The Woodlands Forest Management Plan Community Associations of The Woodlands EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Woodlands is a master planned community encompassing over 27,000 acres of forestland in Montgomery County, Texas. It is a community in which people live, work, and play in close association with the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Adventures
    1 M18 Alyea Park 2 M18 Ambler Flatwoods Nature Preserve 3 M18 American Discovery Trail 4 M18 Aukiki Wetland Conservation Area 5 M18 Bailly Homestead and Chellberg Farm 6 M18 Barker Woods 7 M18 Beverly Shores Area OUTDOOR ADVENTURES MAP 8 M18 Bicentennial Park 9 M18 Bluhm County Park 10 M18 Brincka-Cross Gardens 11 M18 Broken Wagon Bison 12 M18 Brookdale Park 13 M18 C&O Greenway 14 M18 Calumet Bike Trail 15 M18 Calumet Park 16 M18 Campbell Street Access 17 M18 Central Avenue Beach 18 M18 Central Park Plaza 19 M18 Chustak Public Fishing Area 20 M18 Coffee Creek Park A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y 21 M18 Coffee Creek Watershed Preserve 22 M18 Countryside Park and Alton Goin Museum 1 1 23 M18 Cowles Bog Trail 24 M18 Creek Ridge County Park 95 New Buffalo 25 M18 Creekside Park 2 2 26 M18 Cressmoor Prairie Nature Preserve 27 M18 239 94 Dale B. Engquist Nature Preserve 12 28 M18 Deep River County Park US BIKE ROUTE #36 3 Wilson Rd 3 29 M18 Deep River Water Trail Michiana MICHIGAN 30 M18 Deer Trail Park Michiana 77 W 10 E 1000 N ShShooresres 00 N INDIANA 31 M18 Drazer Park (Thomas S. Drazer Memorial Park) E 0 0 5 Long 94 4 N 32 M18 Dunbar Beach 4 E 900 N 77 Beach 12 US BIKE ROUTE #36 33 M18 Dune Park Station 128 44 2 Tryon Rd 39 92 d W 800 N Saugany 15 R 34 E k M18 Dune Succession Trail Lake c E i 5 W Michigan 2 w 131 0 r Blvd 4 0 Hudson a 212 3 124 N K t Lake S N Meer Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Calumet Area: an Inventory of the Region's Resources, Illinois
    THE CALUMET AREA: AN INVENTORY OF THE REGION=S RESOURCES by Ruth Sparks Seeking natural areas in the Calumet area seems, at first, a hopeless task. Several Chicago neighborhoods and southern suburbs are located here, as well as the industries, service providers, and retail establishments that provide employment for thousands of people. With nearly a million people living here, the human population density is more than 4,000 people per square mile. A few natural nooks and crannies still exist, however, some of which contain unexpected treasures. The area is part of the Greater Chicago Metropolitan Region and includes five townships in southern Cook County and a small fraction of Will County. The core of the area is Lake Calumet, but the Calumet Area as defined in this report extends from the Illinois-Indiana border west to just beyond Tinley Park and Burbank and, north to south, from 95th Street in Chicago to Lansing, covering 185 square miles within the watersheds of the Calumet River and the man-made Calumet Sag Channel. Sizeable tributaries include the Little Calumet River and the Grand Calumet River, which drain the eastern portion of the area before joining to form the Calumet River. Stony Creek, in the northwestern part of the area, has a mild slope and gently flowing water. Midlothian Creek and Tinley Creek are located in hillier country south of the Calumet Sag Channel and so have steeper slopes and faster moving water. The Calumet Union Drainage Ditch is a man-made drainage canal which flows into the upper Little Calumet River.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Popular Annual Financial Report
    CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT Chicago, Illinois Children First Built to Last Best Deal in Town Extra Effort Popular Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Prepared by the Chief Financial Officer and the Office of the Comptroller Rahm Emanuel, Mayor, City of Chicago Jesse H. Ruiz, President of the Board of Commissioners Michael P. Kelly, General Superintendent and Chief Executive Officer Steve Lux, Chief Financial Officer Cecilia Prado, CPA, Comptroller TABLE OF CONTENTS Commissioner’s Letter…………………………………………………………………………………………...….1 Comptroller’s Message……………………………………………………………………………………………...2 Organizational Structure & Management…………...……………………………………………………..3 Map of Parks……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Staffed Locations…………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..5 Operating Indicators………………………………………………………………………………………………....6 CPD Spotlight………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…7 Core Values Children First……………………………………………………………………………………………………...8 Best Deal in Town……………………………………………………..………………………………………..9 Built to Last……………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Extra Effort………………………………………………………………………………………………………..11 Management’s Discussion & Analysis………………………………………………………………….12-16 Local Economy………………………………………………………………………………………………………...17 Capital Improvement Projects………………………………………………………………………………….18 Community Efforts…………………………………………………………………………………………………..19 Privatized Contracts………………………………………………………………………………………………...20 Featured Parks………………………………………………………………………………....inside back cover Contact Us…………………………………………………………………………………………………..back
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Brewster SPECIAL TOWN MEETING WARRANT For
    Town of Brewster SPECIAL TOWN MEETING WARRANT for NOVEMBER 18, 2019 at 6:00 PM STONY BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 384 UNDERPASS ROAD Please bring this copy of the warrant to Town Meeting Large print copies of the warrant are available at the Brewster Town Offices November 2019 1 TOWN OF BREWSTER SPECIAL TOWN MEETING WARRANT NOVEMBER 18, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS A INDEX 2 B INFORMATION 3 C IN MEMORIAM; TOWN ARCHIVIST 4 D 2019 SPECIAL TOWN MEETING 5 WARRANT ARTICLES ARTICLE DESCRIPTION SPONSOR PAGE 1 Outstanding Obligations Select Board 5 2 Lease Authorization Select Board 6 3 Capital and Special Projects Select Board 6 Expenditures 4 Property Valuation Services Board of Assessors 13 5 Community Preservation Act Community Preservation Committee 14 6 Zoning Bylaw Amendment/Water Planning Board 17 Quality Protection District 7 Recycling Commission Report Recycling Commission 19 8 Town Code Amendment/Audit Select Board 20 Committee 9 Citizens Petition/Bottled Water and Citizens Petition 21 Beverage Ban 10 Citizens Petition/Elementary School Citizens Petition 22 Consolidation and Creation of Community Center 11 Charter Committee Report Charter Committee 22 12 Other Business Select Board 23 E MUNICIPAL DRINKING WATER 25 ACCESS AND SINGLE-USE PLASTIC BOTTLE POLICY F PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 29 CITIZENS PETITION PLASTIC BOTTLE BAN (ARTICLE 9) G TOWN MODERATOR’S RULES 33 H GLOSSARY OF FINANCIAL TERMS 35 November 2019 2 INFORMATION FOR NOVEMBER 18, 2019 SPECIAL TOWN MEETING Services Available to the Public During Town Meeting TRANSPORTATION: The Council on Aging offers rides to and/or from Town Meeting. For information or to schedule a ride to and/or from Town Meeting please call the Council on Aging at 508-896-2737 by noon on Thursday, November 14th.
    [Show full text]
  • AOÇ, the Open Space of Ankara
    AOÇ, The Open Space of Ankara Mohammadjavad Shahri More than 50% of the world’s population lives in cities. This statistic implies that the well-being of city residents is essential on a global scale and will only become more important. For many cities in Europe, a place where >70% of the population already lives in urban areas, a further increase in the number of people living in urban areas is expected to rise to almost 82% by 2050 (United Nations, 2012). Moreover, this trend is accompanied by an increase in urban land cover. Studies on change in urban land use suggest that the substitution of land cover particularly for an impervious surface is detrimental to both the environment and the quality of life of residents. Environmental impacts include the infill of fragile wetlands, the fragmentation of ecosystems, the changes in the net primary productivity, which impacts the carbon cycle and the reduction of urban green spaces (Pauleit, Ennos, & Golding, 2005). Regarding the latter issue, urban green spaces – broadly defined as any vegetation found in the urban environment, including parks, open spaces, residential gardens, or street trees – provide important environmental benefits. These spaces help to preserve and enhance biodiversity within urban ecosystems by means of species or habitats (Tzoulas, 2007). In light of climate change and the threats posed by urban heat waves, urban green spaces provide fresh air, reduce noise and counteract high air temperatures through their cooling capabilities. In addition, urban green spaces provide important social benefits. Such spaces have a positive influence on psychological and mental health via stress reduction and relaxation.
    [Show full text]
  • Calumet Open Space Reserve Plan
    Calumet Open Space Reserve Plan 2 Dear Chicagoans: The idea for the Calumet Open Space Reserve was born out of the Calumet Area Land Use Plan, a plan for sustainable development of the land around Lake Calumet on the southeast side of Chicago. In attempting to create a plan that promoted industrial redevelopment while protecting wetlands, the opportunity to create an enormous urban nature preserve emerged. As proposed by the Calumet Area Land Use Plan and as detailed in this document, approximately 4,000 acres of the Calumet area are slated to become part of the Calumet Open Space Reserve. These lands and waters support large populations of herons, egrets and other water birds. Marshes and open lands will eventually be interconnected by hiking and biking trails. The acquisition and management of the first round of properties for the Calumet Open Space Reserve is already being undertaken by a coalition of state and local agencies. Residents and workers in the Calumet area will benefit from daily interaction with nature, and all Chicago residents will be able to enjoy what will become the City’s largest nature reserve. Eventually it will be possible to bike from the Loop to the Reserve on protected trails. Together with the City’s Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District and Planned Manufacturing District (PMD) established in the Calumet area to sustain and develop industry, this plan for the Calumet Open Space Reserve will help bring a bright future to Chicago’s southeast side. Sincerely, Richard M. Daley Mayor Calumet Open Space Reserve
    [Show full text]
  • Bikes on Trains Program
    Trails Ride your bike along Lakeshore Bike Drive in Chicago, explore the trails the South Shore Line along the Indiana Dunes National Park and experience vibrant APRIL 1, 2019 - OCTOBER 31, 2019* Your bike can ride, too! downtown South Bend. Bicycling enthusiasts can take their bikes on the South Shore Line from Chicago to South Bend! South Bend Hammond Bike racks, located in specified train cars, are Airport Erie Lackawanna Trail provided free of charge on a first-come, East Bank Trail Monon Trail first-served basis. Northside Trail Wolf Lake Trail Riverside Trail West Bank Walkway Hegewisch Look for the Symbol Big Marsh Park Dune Park Bike rack-equipped train cars are clearly marked Calumet Trail 57th Street with a bike symbol prominently located on the Dunes Kankakee Trail McCormick Place windows of each car. Cyclists are asked to enter Museum Campus and exit the bike train cars through the center East Chicago Van Buren Millennium doors. Upon boarding, bikes are to be placed in the Bloomingdale Trail Lake George Trail Lakefront Trail self-locking racks. For more information on trails visit: South Shore Indiana Dunes LaPorte County Visit South Bend Convention & Tourism Convention & Mishawaka Visitors Authority Visitors Bureau mysouthshoreline.com For safety reasons, bicycles may only board Millennium or disembark at designated stations. Van Buren Street Now you can Museum Campus McCormick Place Bicycle Platform 57th Street Bicycles Not Permitted 63rd Street ES UN K A D AR DIAN L P IN ION A NAT Bike Hegewisch Lake Hudson 11th Street (M. City)11th Dune Park Hammond Miller South Bend Airport Beverly Shores Beverly Carroll Avenue (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Metra Increasing Service on 7 More Lines Enhanced Schedules to Take Effect July 12
    News Release Metra Media Relations 312-322-6776 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Metra increasing service on 7 more lines Enhanced schedules to take effect July 12 CHICAGO (July 1, 2021) – Metra today posted schedules for expanded rush hour service to begin Monday, July 12 on seven additional lines to meet growing ridership. New schedules will take effect July 12 on the Heritage Corridor, Milwaukee District North and West, SouthWest Service, North Central Service and Union Pacific Northwest and West lines. On the same day, Metra will also launch previously announced new pilot schedules on the BNSF, Metra Electric and UP North lines that provide more off-peak options. A similar pilot schedule for the Rock Island Line is set to take effect on July 19. “My Metra is about listening to the needs of our riders. These new schedules are intended to help our customers transition back to a regular work commute providing them with more choices and flexibility,” said Metra CEO/Executive Director Jim Derwinski. “We expect ridership to continue to increase as the summer progresses and will continue to monitor conditions and make schedule adjustments that are responsive to our customers’ needs.” The new schedules can be viewed now at metrarail.com. In addition to new trains, there are minor adjustments to the timetables of some existing trains on some lines; customers are advised to review the new schedules to see if the timetables of their trains have changed. All the changes are highlighted on the new schedules. The guiding principles for Metra’s service restoration are to provide consistent and frequent service throughout the day; create easily understandable and memorable service patterns; implement new express service when possible in the peak travel periods; explore reverse-commute and new ridership markets; promote regional equity and create transfer opportunities within Metra and with other transit services.
    [Show full text]
  • Program and Budget Book
    2016 Program and Budget Book Revised 11/11/2015 metrarail.com UP-N o T ILLINOIS / WISCONSIN STATE LINE Kenosha Winthrop Harbor METRA BOARD McHENRY Antioch NCS LAKE Zion OF DIRECTORS MD-N Lake Villa UP-NW Fox Lake Harvard Ingleside Round Lake Beach Martin J. Oberman Long Lake Washington St. Waukegan Chairman McHenry Round Lake (Grayslake) Grayslake Prairie Crossing North Chicago N Chicago Prairie Crossing Great Lakes Woodstock Libertyville Lake Bluff LAKE Jack E. Partelow Mundelein MICHIGAN Lake Forest Vice Chairman Crystal Lake Cary Lake Will County Pingree Rd. Vernon Hills Forest Fort Sheridan Prairie View Highwood Fox River Grove Buffalo Grove Highland Park Deerfield Ravinia John Plante Barrington Braeside Lake Cook Wheeling Treasurer Rd. Glencoe Northbrook Hubbard Woods KANE COOK Palatine Suburban Cook County Prospect Winnetka Heights N. Glenview Indian Hill Arlington Park Kenilworth MD-W Arlington Heights Glenview Wilmette Big Timber Central St.(Evanston) Rodney S. Craig Mt. Prospect Golf Elgin Cumberland Des Plaines Davis St.(Evanston) O Dee Road Morton Grove Secretary National St. 'Ha Main St.(Evanston) re Trans Park (Elgin) Bartlett fe Ridge Edgebrook Rogers Park Hanover Park Schaumburg r Suburban Cook County Roselle Edison Park Medinah R Forest Glen Itasca ood Dale osemon Norwood Park t W Schiller Par Gladstone Park Mayfair Bensenville Jefferson Park Frankli k k Ravenswood n r Irving Par a DU PAGE k P Park Manuel Barbosa n Grayland River Grove Elmwood Park so ve. Mont Clare n Mars A d Clybourn Galewood o Healy Ha Director o n UP-W t r est Chicago e r Elmhurst t Franklin Park Villa Park Mannheim k k Berkeley r es CHICAGO W a Lombard Grand/ W Mayw Oa P Rive Fores Kane County Glen Ellyn Cicero Winfield k d College Elburn r Wheaton o a o ve.
    [Show full text]