Teacher Edition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Battles of Germantown: Public History and Preservation in America’S Most Historic Neighborhood During the Twentieth Century
The Battles of Germantown: Public History and Preservation in America’s Most Historic Neighborhood During the Twentieth Century Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By David W. Young Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Steven Conn, Advisor Saul Cornell David Steigerwald Copyright by David W. Young 2009 Abstract This dissertation examines how public history and historic preservation have changed during the twentieth century by examining the Germantown neighborhood of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Founded in 1683, Germantown is one of America’s most historic neighborhoods, with resonant landmarks related to the nation’s political, military, industrial, and cultural history. Efforts to preserve the historic sites of the neighborhood have resulted in the presence of fourteen historic sites and house museums, including sites owned by the National Park Service, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and the City of Philadelphia. Germantown is also a neighborhood where many of the ills that came to beset many American cities in the twentieth century are easy to spot. The 2000 census showed that one quarter of its citizens live at or below the poverty line. Germantown High School recently made national headlines when students there attacked a popular teacher, causing severe injuries. Many businesses and landmark buildings now stand shuttered in community that no longer can draw on the manufacturing or retail economy it once did. Germantown’s twentieth century has seen remarkably creative approaches to contemporary problems using historic preservation at their core. -
The George Washington University
The George Washington University Degree Programmme Does your University accept the Yes. HKCEE grades are considered direct equivalents to GCSE HKCEE and HKALE for exams. The HKALE grades are equivalent to GCE A-level. admission to your University? What are the entry requirements HKALE grades A-C. for a student with HKCEE and HKCEE in a broad range of subjects – the majority should be grade HKALE qualifications entering A-B. your University? Do students with HKCEE and Students must take the SAT or ACT and have an official score report HKALE qualifications have to sit sent from the College Board to the George Washington University. an entrance examination to enter your University? Is there a language proficiency Students must submit an official TOEFL score (Test of English as a test that students with HKCEE Foreign Language) unless the student scores a 550 or higher on the and HKALE qualifications critical reading section of the SAT. wishing to enter your University must take? Is there a standard on an For TOEFL minimum requirements visit: international English scale that http://gwired.gwu.edu/adm/apply/international.html students with HKCEE and HKALE qualifications wishing to enter your University must reach? Are there any other tests that No. students with HKCEE and HKALE qualifications wishing to enter your University must take? When must they be taken? Is there an entry quota that No. applies to students with HKCEE and HKALE qualifications wishing to enter your University? Where can information be Up-to-date information can be found -
Newsletter 28 • October 15, 2018
The Chain Reaction Humanitarian Solutions Worldwide Newsletter 28 • October 15, 2018 Do you notice anything different? What’s Inside this Issue BY CHEMISTS WITHOUT BORDERS LEADERSHIP [email protected] 1 Do you notice anything different? As the organization is growing we have felt the need to refresh our image to better reflect the work we are doing to solve humanitarian problems 2 AIDSfreeAFRICA equipping labs in Cameroon worldwide. Today we would like to share with you our first big change: the logo. Changing the image that we have learnt to identify with is not 3 Affordable education in the easy. However, Sasha Dimov has done a stellar job developing our logo to Age of Information truly represent the mission and vision of Chemists Without Borders. 4 Ongley-Myers Sierra Leone Education Project The hexagon (reminiscent of so many chemical structures and easily 5 Pay It Forward Bangladesh: relatable to many chemists) remains at the center of the organization. The Story of Spreading However, with the introduction of new colors and the circles surround- Kindness ing the hexagon, we are recognizing the different dimensions and systems that are at play in a humanitarian organization like ours. Our Mission A wholehearted thank you goes to Sasha for her hard work. We cannot Chemists Without Borders solves humanitarian problems by mobilizing the wait to flaunt our new look! resources and expertise of the global chemistry community and its networks. As you know, being an organization run by volunteers, we depend on Our Vision inspired and generous individuals, organizations, and institutions, to be A global support network of volunteers able to fulfill our mission of solving humanitarian problems. -
How Kindness Can Be Contagious in Healthcare
comment Los Angeles, CA, USA. 5Department of Medicine, 8. Hall, M. J., Forman, A. D., Pilarski, R., Wiesner, G. & Giri, V. N. Acknowledgements J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 12, 1339–1346 (2014). The viewpoints expressed herein are those of the authors Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 9. De Rubis, G., Krishnan, S. R. & Bebawy, M. Pharmacol. Res. 136, and do not reflect official viewpoints of the US National 6Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA. 35–44 (2018). Institutes of Health, The Center for Medicare & Medicaid ✉e-mail: [email protected] 10. Lennon, A. M. et al. Science 369, eabb9601 (2020). 11. Liu, M. C. et al. Ann. Oncol. 31, 745–759 (2020). Innovation, CMS or the companies mentioned. The 12. Heyn, H. & Esteller, M. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 679–692 (2012). authors appreciate helpful comments on earlier drafts of Published online: 1 July 2021 13. Luo, H. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaax7533 (2020). this article from S. Aldubayan, H. Hampel, A. Kesselheim https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01431-5 14. Aravanis, A. M., Lee, M. & Klausner, R. D. Cell 168, and R. Weinberg. R.C.G. is supported by US National 571–574 (2017). Institutes of Health grants HG006500, HD077671, References 15. Chen, X. et al. Nat. Commun. 11, 3475 (2020). HD090019, HG009922, HL143295 and TR003201 and by 1. Te American Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/ 16. Bradley, S. H. & Barclay, M. E. Br. Med. J. 372, m4933 (2021). the Franca Sozzani Fund. content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/ 17. -
From HFC's Director
National Park Service HFCU.S. Department of the Interior onMEDIA May / June | 2008 Issue 23 Yellowstone National Park’s In This Issue “Roving Ranger” videocasts enable visitors to download interpretive content from Interpretive the Web to their own digital Techniques in device, and then play back 2 New Media the content during their park visit. New technology like this gives our audiences greater control over when, What New where, and how they receive Media Products interpretive information. 5 are Parks Using Learn more about new me- Today? dia products like this starting on page 5. (NPS Photo) New Employees and Staff News 6 at Harpers Ferry From HFC’s Director Center New media—digital and often web-based—off er the interpretation and education pro- HFC Products fessional many opportunities to deliver information to our many audiences. More than 11 Receive Awards ever before, these tools allow us to target our messages to very specifi c demographics and create a whole new palette of experiences for visitors. New Film Pre- Each of the “new media” technologies has its own content requirements, operational mieres at Home- regimes, and investment and life cycle costs. As a result, some are more successful in park 14 stead National environments than others. In this issue, we take a look at a few of the new technologies Monument that have been used in our parks and hear from experienced park professionals about the challenges, successes, and lessons learned as they have implemented new media products in their park. New Graphic 15 Identity Website Even though many of these exciting new media solutions are by design “user generated” Launched at the park site, Harpers Ferry Center looks forward to helping parks prepare their con- tent and create standards that benefi t the NPS system-wide. -
Exclusive Rulebookrulebook
SARATOGA 1 The Turning Point of the American Revolution, 1777 EXCLUSIVEEXCLUSIVE RULEBOOKRULEBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Prepare for Play .................................................... 2 7. Special Scenario Rules ......................................... 6 2. How to Win ........................................................... 2 8. Historical Scenario, “Freeman’s Farm” ................ 7 3. Special Rules ........................................................ 3 9. Scenario Victory Conditions ................................. 7 4. Variants ................................................................ 4 10. Special Scenario Rules ......................................... 8 5. Saratoga “Next Day” Scenario Setup ................... 4 Historical Article: Saratoga .......................................... 9 6. Scenario Victory Conditions ................................. 5 Counter scans ............................................................... 15 GMT Games, LLC Ammo Depletion Log .................................................. 16 P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com © 2006 and 2017 GMT Games, LLC 3rd Edition 2 SARATOGA 1.4 Scenario Length Introduction The scenario begins on Turn 1, and ends on Turn 12, unless ei- This, the Third Edition of Saratoga, contains significant differ- ther side achieves a Decisive or Substantial victory before then. ences from previous editions including rules changes or modifi- cations, changes in terrain, and new or re-named units. Terrain 1.5. Player Order and Initiative and -
Quantifying Visitor Impact and Material Degradation at George Washington's Mount Vernon Laurel Lynne Bartlett Clemson University, [email protected]
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2013 Quantifying Visitor Impact and Material Degradation at George Washington's Mount Vernon Laurel Lynne Bartlett Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Bartlett, Laurel Lynne, "Quantifying Visitor Impact and Material Degradation at George Washington's Mount Vernon" (2013). All Theses. 1599. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1599 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. QUANTIFYING VISITOR IMPACT AND MATERIAL DEGRADATION AT GEORGE WASHINGTON’S MOUNT VERNON A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Schools of Clemson University and the College of Charleston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Historic Preservation by Laurel Lynne Bartlett May 2013 Accepted by: Dr. Carter L. Hudgins, Committee Chair Frances Ford Ralph Muldrow Elizabeth Ryan ABSTRACT Over one million visitors per year traverse the visitor path through George Washington’s home at Mount Vernon. Increased visitation has tested the limits of the architectural materials and created the single most threatening source of degradation. While the history of Mount Vernon is dotted with attempts to mitigate damage caused by visitors, scientific analysis of the dynamic impacts to the historic fabric is needed to preserve the integrity of the preeminent national house museum. The following thesis presents a holistic analysis of visitor impact and material degradation occurring at Mount Vernon. -
Lyndon Baines Johnson Memorial Grove on the Potomac Washington, D
10-900 OHB Mo. 1U-, . 10-90) RECEIVED 2289 •»i .I " United States Department of the Interior National Park Service JUN12 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM Lyndon Baines Johnson Memorial Grove on the Potomac Washington, D. C. (Page 1) This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How tc Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, entet *N/A" for ©not applicable/ For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories anc subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use * typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Lyndon Baines Johnson Memorial Grove on the Potomac_ other names/site number _____________________________________ 2. Location street & number Lady Bird Johnson Park________ not for publication city or town Columbia Island. Washington. D. C. vicinity X. state __________________ code county code zip code _______ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X_ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register o; Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property *»y meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria I recommend that this property be considered significant X nationally _ statewide _ locally. -
NCPC Final Report
NCPC Final Report for CONSTRUCT NEW COMFORT STATION AT U.S. MARINE CORPS WAR MEMORIAL GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY Arlington, Virginia GWMP 231335 Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Denver Service Center 12795 W. Alameda Parkway Denver, Colorado 80225 Prepared by: EYP Architecture & Engineering 1000 Potomac Street, NW Washington, DC 20007 July 24, 2018 Arlington Ridge Park George Washington Memorial Parkway US Marine Corps War Memorial Comfort Station Project NCPC Concept Report 2/47 Arlington Ridge Park George Washington Memorial Parkway US Marine Corps War Memorial Comfort Station Project NCPC Concept Report Table of Contents Page Project Overview…………………………………………………………………………6 Project Background and Purpose…………………………………………………..…6 Political History……………………………………………………………………....7 Description of Project Area…………………………………………………………….7 Arlington Ridge Park………………………………………………………...……….7 Memorial Grounds……………………………………………………………………7 Description of Proposed Development and Alternatives…………………………..….8 Proposed Development……………………………………………………………….8 Project Design Option 1………………………………………………………….….10 Project Design Option 2……………………………………………………………..13 Final Option Selection……………………………….……………………………....15 Master Plan Alignment………………………………………………………………...16 Schedule…………………………………………………………………………………16 Project Cost Estimate………………………………………………….……………….17 Outreach and Coordination………………………………….……………………….18 Updates to Previous Submissions…………………..………………………………...21 Commission Comment from Prior Review……………………………………………21 -
Maryland in the American Revolution
382-MD BKLT COVER fin:382-MD BKLT COVER 2/13/09 2:55 PM Page c-4 Maryland in the Ame rican Re volution An Exhibition by The Society of the Cincinnati Maryland in the Ame rican Re volution An Exhibition by The Society of the Cincinnati Anderson House Wash ingt on, D .C. February 27 – September 5, 2009 his catalogue has been produced in conjunction with the exhibition Maryland in the American Revolution on display fTrom February 27 to September 5, 2009, at Anderson House, the headquarters, library, and museum of The Society of the Cincinnati in Washington, D.C. The exhibition is the eleventh in a series focusing on the contributions to the e do most Solemnly pledge American Revolution made by the original thirteen states ourselves to Each Other and France. W & to our Country, and Engage Generous support for this exhibition and catalogue was provided by the Society of the Cincinnati of Maryland. ourselves by Every Thing held Sacred among Mankind to Also available: Massachusetts in the American Revolution: perform the Same at the Risque “Let It Begin Here” (1997) of our Lives and fortunes. New York in the American Revolution (1998) New Jersey in the American Revolution (1999) — Bush River Declaration Rhode Island in the American Revolution (2000) by the Committee of Observation, Connecticut in the American Revolution (2001) Delaware in the American Revolution (2002) Harford County, Maryland Georgia in the American Revolution (2003) March 22, 1775 South Carolina in the American Revolution (2004) Pennsylvania in the American Revolution (2005) North Carolina in the American Revolution (2006) Text by Emily L. -
Action PEOPLE
IDEAS Action PEOPLE THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY TRUST 2014 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Letter from the Chairman of the Executive Committee and President 2 Year in Review 8 Competitive Education and Economic Development Grants 14 Competitive Health, Housing and Human Services Grants 24 Competitive Civic and Cultural Vitality Grants 32 Competitive Sustainable Development Grants 36 The Searle Funds at The Chicago Community Trust 40 Community Champion: María Bechily 42 Candid Conversations 46 Community Champion: Automotive Mentoring Group 48 Donor Advised Grants 67 Designated Grants 68 Community Champions: Bill and Cheryl Lowry 70 Matching Gifts 71 Grants from Identity-Focused Funds 72 Grants from Supporting Organizations 76 Community Champion: Chicago School of Data 78 Grants from Collaborative Funds 79 In Memoriam 83 Funds of The Chicago Community Trust and Affiliates 91 Contributors to Funds at The Chicago Community Trust and Affiliates 98 Community Champion: Ana Guajardo 100 The 1915 Society 102 Professional Advisory Committee and Young Professional Advisory Committee 104 Community Champions: Ray and Susan Gillette 106 Executive Committee 107 Trustees Committee and Banks 108 The Chicago Community Trust Staff 109 Trust at a Glance LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND PRESIDENT DEAR FRIENDS, For 99 years, The Chicago Community Trust has reflected the collective spirit of commitment to community powered by the generosity of donors, residents, and non- profit and civic leaders throughout our region. To mark our 99th anniversary, we began in earnest to spark that spirit of community by engaging a much larger circle of residents in a conversation about the future of metropolitan Chicago. -
PA Project Part 4
CHRONOLOGY OF THE MARCH THROUGH PENNSYLVANIA 30 August 1781 The Land Route of Generals George Washington and the comte de Rochambeau to Philadelphia in September 1781 (Route Number 1): In his diary, Washington wrote 30th. I set out myself for Philadelphia to arrange matters there - provide Vessels & hasten the transportation of the Ordnance Stores, &ca. - directing before I set out, the secd. York Regiment (which had not all arrived from Albany before we left Kings ferry) to follow with the Boats- -Intrenching Tools &ca. the French Rear to Trenton. 31st. Arrived at Philadelphia to dinner and immediately hastened up all the Vessels that could be procured--but finding them inadequate to the purpose of transporting both Troops & Stores, Count de Rochambeau & myself concluded it would be best to let the Troops March by land to the head of Elk, & gave directions accordingly to all but the 2d. York Regiment which was ordered (with its baggage) to come down in the Batteaux they had in charge to Christiana bridge.392 This diary entry seems proof that Washington and Rochambeau arrived in Philadelphia on 31 August, but both Washington's private secretary Jonathan Trumbull and Baron Closen give 30 August as the date of arrival, a date that is also reported by the Philadelphia Packet in its edition for 2 September. Since Washington and Rochambeau had crossed the Delaware in the morning of 30 August, an arrival date in Philadelphia of 31 August seems unlikely given the relatively short distance, 30 miles, which the generals had to travel to get to Philadelphia.