The Aesthetics of the Ephemeral
CHAPTER ONE THE JOURNEY IN THE DESERT The grandeur of deserts derives from their being, in their aridity, the negative of the earth’s surface. The silence of the desert is a visual thing, too. A product of the gaze that stares out and finds nothing to reflect it . for there to be silence, time itself has to attain a sort of horizontality; there has to be no echo of time in the future, but simply a sliding of geological strata one upon the other giving out nothing more than a fossil murmur. —Jean Baudrillard, America (2010) Deserts, as the French cultural theorist Jean Baudrillard beautifully describes them, are magnificent. Their grandeur derives from a paradox that is intrin- sic to deserts’ magnificence: their austerity. For deserts are arid spaces, waste- lands, desolate and unprotected. Deserts are the negative of the earth’s surface, places where silence and time intermingle and become simultane- ously visual and fossilized. Once time freezes in deserts, there is no echo of a future. Yet, Hannah Arendt observes that the greatest danger in the desert is that there are sandstorms, for the desert is not always as quiet as a cemetery. In the desert, everything is possible, and thus even autonomous movements might begin.1 Initiating a journey in the desert, then, is a daunt- ing task. We are forced to ask: How do those who traverse the desert do it? Do all of those who traverse deserts—places marked by loss, emptiness, and even exile—find an oasis in them? Catalan drama, one of the artistic manifestations most deeply rooted in Catalan
[Show full text]