Tilapia Lake Virus: a Threat to the Global Tilapia Industry? Mona Dverdal Jansen1 , Ha Thanh Dong2 and Chadag Vishnumurthy Mohan3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tilapia Lake Virus: a Threat to the Global Tilapia Industry? Mona Dverdal Jansen1 , Ha Thanh Dong2 and Chadag Vishnumurthy Mohan3 Reviews in Aquaculture, 1–15 doi: 10.1111/raq.12254 Tilapia lake virus: a threat to the global tilapia industry? Mona Dverdal Jansen1 , Ha Thanh Dong2 and Chadag Vishnumurthy Mohan3 1 Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway 2 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Bangkok, Thailand 3 WorldFish, Penang, Malaysia Correspondence Abstract Mona Dverdal Jansen, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Pb 750 Sentrum, N-0106 Oslo, Tilapia lake virus (TiLV) is a recently described virus affecting wild and farmed Norway. Email: mona-dverdal.jansen@ tilapines. At present, it has been reported on three continents (Asia, Africa and vetinst.no South America) and the number of countries where the agent has been detected is likely to increase rapidly as a result of increased awareness, surveillance and avail- Received 24 January 2018; accepted 10 April ability of diagnostic methods. Any lack of openness regarding the TiLV status of a 2018. translocating live tilapia population destined for aquaculture may inadvertently contribute to the spread of the agent. Currently, there is no cure for viral diseases in aquaculture and while vaccines and selective breeding have proved successful in reducing the severity of some viral diseases, there are currently severe knowl- edge gaps relating to TiLV and no effective, affordable vaccines are yet available. This paper summarizes the published scientific information on TiLV and high- lights important issues relating to its diagnosis, mitigation and control measures. While there have been no scientific studies on the socio-economic impact of TiLV, it may pose a significant threat particularly to small-scale fish farmers’ livelihoods and wild tilapine populations if left uncontrolled. To aid disease inves- tigations, the authors propose case definitions for suspected and confirmed cases of TiLV infections. Key words: review, syncytial hepatitis, tilapia, Tilapia lake virus. ascites and abnormal behaviour (Amal & Zamri-Saad 2011; Introduction Suwannasang et al. 2014). In 1997, it was estimated that Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) is farmed on several continents, the yearly economic loss due to infection with Streptococ- with production ranging from extensive backyard ponds to cus was in the order of $150 million (Shoemaker & Klesius large, commercial operations. According to the Food and 1997). Apart from Streptococcosis, there are several com- Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the mon infectious diseases in farmed tilapia. Columnaris global production of tilapia was estimated at 6.4 million caused by Flavobacterium columnare often shows clinical tons (MT) in 2015, with the top three producers being the signs of necrotic gills, fin rot, skin erosion or necrotic mus- People’s Republic of China (1.78 MT), Indonesia cle (Figueiredo et al. 2005; Dong et al. 2015a). Francisel- (1.12 MT) and Egypt (0.88 MT) (FAO 2017a). Bangladesh, losis caused by Francisella noatunensis subsp. orientalis and Vietnam and the Philippines are other leading producers Edwardsiellosis caused by Edwardsiella ictaluri produce (FAO 2017a). clinical signs of visceral white spots in internal organs (Soto Amongst the advantages of farming tilapia is its general et al. 2009, 2012; Nguyen et al. 2016). Haemorrhagic septi- hardiness, adaptability to various production systems and caemia caused by motile aeromonads (Aeromonas hy- rapid growth, with advances in genetic selection and tar- drophila, A. sobria, A. veronii and A. jandaei) may present geted breeding having further improved these characteris- clinical signs of haemorrhage, exophthalmia and ascites (Li tics (Ponzoni et al. 2011; e.g. FAO 2017b). Amongst & Cai 2011; Dong et al. 2015b, 2017d) and mixed clinical important disease challenges are Streptococcus infections, signs of complicated multiple infections (Dong et al. which affect production worldwide and can occur in most 2015b; Assis et al. 2017). A vast array of viruses have been production systems. Clinical signs of streptococcal infec- reported to affect cultured finfish (Crane & Hyatt 2011; tion may include skin haemorrhages, ocular alterations, Zhang & Gui 2015). In tilapia, several viral infections were © 2018 The Authors Reviews in Aquaculture Published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 1 This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. M. D. Jansen et al. occasionally reported in tilapia fry including betanodavirus with TiLV as tilapia lake virus disease (OIE 2017a), other and tilapia larvae encephalitis virus (TELV) which present names such as syncytial hepatitis of tilapia (SHT) (Fergu- with neurological signs of erratic swimming or whirling son et al. 2014) and 1-month mortality syndrome (Tat- syndrome (Shlapobersky et al. 2010; Keawcharoen et al. tiyapong et al. 2017) have been used in scientific papers. 2015); infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV) TiLV has been identified in samples from farms experienc- associated with gross signs of lethargy, gill pallor and dis- ing summer mortalities in Egypt (Fathi et al. 2017); how- tension of the coelomic cavity (Subramaniam et al. 2016). ever, the direct association with the virus and the summer In the late 2000s, there was a large reduction in the mortality events has not yet been determined. annual wild catch of the Israeli Sea of Galilee’s main edible In addition to scientific papers and OIE notification doc- fish, S. galilaeus, from 316 metric tons in 2005 to a low of uments, several other non-scientific documents, such as a 8 metric tons in 2009 (Eyngor et al. 2014). At the same Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific (NACA) time (2009), large losses of farmed tilapia were recorded disease advisory (NACA 2017) and a CGIAR Research Pro- throughout Israel (Eyngor et al. 2014). A novel RNA virus gram on Fish Agri-food Systems factsheet (CGIAR 2017), was subsequently identified and termed tilapia lake virus have been published in relation to this emerging disease (TiLV) (Eyngor et al. 2014). Subsequent to the Israeli pub- problem in an effort to notify relevant stakeholders. This lication, scientific publications have reported identification review summarizes the currently available scientific infor- of TiLV from samples collected in Colombia (Kembou Tso- mation on TiLV and highlights important research gaps fack et al. 2017), Ecuador (Ferguson et al. 2014; Bacharach and issues relating to prevention and control of the associ- et al. 2016a), Egypt (Fathi et al. 2017; Nicholson et al. ated disease. Some additional information currently only 2017), India (Behera et al. 2018), Indonesia (Koesharyani available in grey literature and through personal communi- et al. 2018), Malaysia (Amal et al. 2018) and Thailand cation has also been included for the sake of completeness. (Dong et al. 2017a; Surachetpong et al. 2017). In May 2017, the FAO released a Global Information and Early Aetiological agent Warning System (GIEWs) special alert 338 on TiLV (FAO 2017c) and the World Organization for Animal Health Viral properties (OIE) published a TiLV technical disease card (OIE 2017a). The virus has been described as a novel enveloped, nega- TiLV is currently not listed by the OIE, but there is ongoing tive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus with 10 segments work evaluating whether listing should take place. How- encoding 10 proteins (Eyngor et al. 2014; Bacharach et al. ever, TiLV is listed for reporting under the NACA regional 2016a; Surachetpong et al. 2017) and a diameter between Quarterly Aquatic Animal Diseases (QAAD) reporting 55 and 100 nm (Ferguson et al. 2014; Eyngor et al. 2014; system for the Asia-Pacific. Subsequent to the OIE publica- del-Pozo et al. 2017; Surachetpong et al. 2017; Fig. 1). All tion, six countries/territories have submitted notification 10 segments contain an open reading frame (ORF), with to the OIE of TiLV presence, namely Chinese Taipei the largest segment, segment 1, containing an open reading (OIE 2017b), Israel (OIE 2017c), Thailand (OIE 2017d), frame with weak sequence homology to the influenza C Malaysia (OIE 2017e), Peru (OIE 2018) and the Philippines virus PB1 subunit (~17% amino acid identity, 37% seg- (OIE 2017f). While the OIE terms the disease associated ment coverage) (Bacharach et al. 2016a). The remaining Figure 1 Transmission electron micrographs of TiLV-infected fish liver tissue showing cytoplasmic viral particles (white arrows) at low (a) and high (b) magnification. The electron micrograph in (b) is a magnification of the box outlined in black in (a), and the same 3 example virions (80–90 nm diameter) are indicated with white arrows in both electron micrographs (Images by H.T. Dong). Reviews in Aquaculture, 1–15 2 © 2018 The Authors Reviews in Aquaculture Published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Tilapia lake virus threat to tilapia industry segments show no homology to other known viruses (Eyn- epithelium (del-Pozo et al. 2017). Analyses of samples orig- gor et al. 2014; Bacharach et al. 2016a); however, the con- inating from the Tanzanian and Ugandan parts of Lake served complimentary sequences at the 50 and 30 termini Victoria found TiLV RNA prevalence to be highest in the are similar to the genome organization found in orthomyx- spleen, followed by the head kidney, heart and liver oviruses (Bacharach et al. 2016a). A taxonomic
Recommended publications
  • Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011
    SGR 129 Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY AND APPLIED NUTRITION OFFICE OF FOOD SAFETY Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – April 2011 Additional copies may be purchased from: Florida Sea Grant IFAS - Extension Bookstore University of Florida P.O. Box 110011 Gainesville, FL 32611-0011 (800) 226-1764 Or www.ifasbooks.com Or you may download a copy from: http://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations. gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (240) 402-2300 April 2011 Table of Contents: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance • Guidance for the Industry: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance ................................ 1 • CHAPTER 1: General Information .......................................................................................................19 • CHAPTER 2: Conducting a Hazard Analysis and Developing a HACCP Plan
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGEMENT and VALUE CHAIN of NILE TILAPIA CULTURED in PONDS of SMALL-SCALE FARMERS in MOROGORO REGION, TANZANIA Sebastian W. Ch
    MANAGEMENT AND VALUE CHAIN OF NILE TILAPIA CULTURED IN PONDS OF SMALL-SCALE FARMERS IN MOROGORO REGION, TANZANIA Sebastian W. Chenyambuga , Nazael A. Madalla and Berno V. Mnembuka Department of Animal Science, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3004, Morogoro, Tanzania. Abstract A study was carried out to assess production performance and value chain of Nile tilapia grown in ponds of small-scale farmers in Morogoro region, Tanzania. Information was collected through individual interviews of 30 fish farmers. The main reasons for culturing fish were provision of animal protein food for home consumption (66.7%) and generation of income (23.3%). Fish farming contributed 10.6% of household annual income and was ranked second to crop production (50%). The majority of the farmers were fertilizing their ponds with chicken manure (30.0%) and cattle manure (23.3%). Most farmers (73.3%) cultured pure stand of Nile tilapia and only few (26.7%) practiced polyculture of Nile tilapia and African catfish. All farmers depended on natural food as a source of feed for their fish. Moreover, the farmers were feeding maize bran (96.7%), vegetables (66.7%), and kitchen leftovers (13.3%) as supplementary feeds. Men were responsible for purchasing and stocking fingerlings (60.0%), feeding (40.0%), pond maintenance (53.3%), harvesting (60.0%) and selling (43.3%). Women were mainly involved in fish processing (76.7%). The average period from stocking to harvesting was 5.75 ± 0.18 months for Nile tilapia and the mean yield was 6,946.2 kg/ha per year. About 22.2% of the harvested fish were consumed at home and the remaining (77.8%) were sold.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease
    Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease Larry Hammell - Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada Craig Stephen- Centre for Coastal Health, University of Calgary, Canada Ian Bricknell- School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, USA Øystein Evensen- Norwegian School of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo, Norway Patricio Bustos- ADL Diagnostic Chile Ltda., Chile With Contributions by: Ricardo Enriquez- University of Austral, Chile 1 Citation: Hammell, L., Stephen, C., Bricknell, I., Evensen Ø., and P. Bustos. 2009 “Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease” commissioned by the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue, available at http://wwf.worldwildlife.org/site/PageNavigator/SalmonSOIForm Corresponding author: Larry Hammell, email: [email protected] This report was commissioned by the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue. The Salmon Dialogue is a multi-stakeholder, multi-national group which was initiated by the World Wildlife Fund in 2004. Participants include salmon producers and other members of the market chain, NGOs, researchers, retailers, and government officials from major salmon producing and consuming countries. The goal of the Dialogue is to credibly develop and support the implementation of measurable, performance-based standards that minimize or eliminate the key negative environmental and social impacts of salmon farming, while permitting the industry to remain economically viable The Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue focuses their research and standard development on seven key areas of impact of salmon production including: social; feed; disease; salmon escapes; chemical inputs; benthic impacts and siting; and, nutrient loading and carrying capacity. Funding for this report and other Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue supported work is provided by the members of the Dialogue‘s steering committee and their donors.
    [Show full text]
  • Megalocytivirus Induces Complicated Fish Immune Response at Multiple RNA Levels Involving Mrna, Mirna, and Circrna
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Megalocytivirus Induces Complicated Fish Immune Response at Multiple RNA Levels Involving mRNA, miRNA, and circRNA Qian Wu 1,2,3, Xianhui Ning 1 and Li Sun 1,2,3,* 1 CAS and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, CAS Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 7 Nanhai Road, Qingdao 266071, China; [email protected] (Q.W.); [email protected] (X.N.) 2 Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, 1 Wenhai Road, Qingdao 266237, China 3 College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-532-82898829 Abstract: Megalocytivirus is an important viral pathogen to many farmed fishes, including Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). In this study, we examined megalocytivirus-induced RNA responses in the spleen of flounder by high-throughput sequencing and integrative analysis of various RNA- seq data. A total of 1327 microRNAs (miRNAs), including 368 novel miRNAs, were identified, among which, 171 (named DEmiRs) exhibited significantly differential expressions during viral infection in a time-dependent manner. For these DEmiRs, 805 differentially expressed target mRNAs (DETmRs) were predicted, whose expressions not only significantly changed after megalocytivirus infection but were also negatively correlated with their paired DEmiRs. Integrative analysis of Citation: Wu, Q.; Ning, X.; Sun, L. Megalocytivirus Induces immune-related DETmRs and their target DEmiRs identified 12 hub DEmiRs, which, together with Complicated Fish Immune Response their corresponding DETmRs, formed an interaction network containing 84 pairs of DEmiR and at Multiple RNA Levels Involving DETmR.
    [Show full text]
  • A BIBLIOGRAPHY of IMPORTANT TILAPIAS (PISCES: CICHLIDAE) for AQUACULTURE Oreochromisvariabilis, 0 Andersoni, 0
    AMV'__ BIBLIOGRAPHIES 6 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF IMPORTANT TILAPIAS (PISCES: CICHLIDAE) FOR AQUACULTURE Oreochromisvariabilis, 0 andersoni, 0. esculentus, 0. leucostictus, 0. rortimer, 0. spilurus niger,Sarotherodon melanotheron and Tilapia sparnmani PETER SCHOENEN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LIVING AQUATIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF IMPORTANT TILAPIAS (PISCES: CICHLIDAE) FOR AQUACULTURE Oreochromls variabilis, 0. andersoni, 0. esculentus, 0. leucostictus, 0. mortimeri, 0. spilurus niger, Saro therodon melano theron and Tilapia sparrmanii Peter Schoenen International Collection "Cichlid Papers" The Referencc Service Parkstr. 15 D-5176 Inden 4 Federal Republic of Germany 1985 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LIVING AQUATIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MANILA, PHILIPPINES A bibliography of important tilapias (Pisces: Cichlidae) for aquaculture Oreochromis variabilis, 0. andersonii, 0. esculentus, 0. leucostictus, 0. mort/tmer, 0. spilunis niger, Sarotherodon melanothero,, ard -/ilapiasparrmanii PETER SCHOENEN Published by the International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, MCC P.O. Box 1501, Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines with financial assistance from the International Development Research Centre of Canada through ICLARM's Selective Information Service project. 1985 Printed in Manila, Philippins This bibliography is produced directly from the author's manuscript in oider to provide tilapia workers with a useful document in the shortest time. The author should be consulted in the event of difficulty ir verifying details of particular references or in locating sources. ISSN 0115-5997 ISBN 971-1022-19-2 Schoenen, P. 1985, A bibliography of important tilapias (Pisces: Cichlidae) for aquaculture Oreochromis variabilis, 0. andersonii, 0. esculentus, 0. leucostictus, 0. mortimeri, 0. spilurut niger, Sarotherodon mela. notheron and Tilapia sparrrnanii. ICLAHM Biblio­ graphies 6,99 p. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Management AFRICAN GREAT LAKES
    AFRICAN GREAT LAKES CONFERENCE 2nd – 5th MAY 2017, ENTEBBE, UGANDA Dynamics of Fish Stocks of Commercial Importance in Lake Victoria, East Africa: Implications for Management Robert Kayanda, Anton Taabu-Munyaho, Dismas Mbabazi, Hillary Mrosso, and Chrisphine Nyamweya INTRODUCTION • Lake Victoria with a surface area of 68,800 sqkm is the world’s second largest freshwater body • It supports one of the world’s most productive inland fisheries with the estimated total fish landings from the lake for the period of 2011 to 2014 have been about 1 million tons with a beach value increasing from about US$ 550 Million in 2011 to about US$ 840 million in 2014. • It supports about 220,000 fishers (Frame Survey 2016) • The fish stocks of Lake Victoria have changed dramatically since the introduction of Nile perch Lates niloticus during the late 1950s and early 1960s Fishery Haplochromines The Original Fish Fauna Brycinus sp Protopterus Rastrineobola Mormyrus spp Barbus spp Bagrus docmac Labeo Schilbe intermedius Oreochromis variabilis Clarias gariepinus Mormyrus spp Synodontis victoriae Oreochromis leucostictus INTRODUCTION Currently, the fisheries is dominated by four major commercial important species, these are; •Nile perch •Dagaa •Nile tilapia •Haplochromis Apart from Nile tilapia only estimated through trawl and catch surveys, the other 3 are estimated through trawl, acoustics, and catch INTRODUCTION This paper summarizes current knowledge of the status of the fish stocks and reviews the need for species specific management plans for the major commercial important fish species of Lake Victoria (Nile perch, Nile tilapia, dagaa and haplochromines). Methods • Fisheries dependent – Frame surveys – Catch assessment surveys • Fisheries independent – Acoustic – Bottom trawl Biomass and relative abundance • Total biomass from the surveys 3500 remained fairly stable over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of the RAPD Technique in Tilapia Fish: Species and Subspecies Identification
    Heredity 73(1994) 117—123 Received 25 November 1993 Genetical Society of Great Britain Application of the RAPD technique in tilapia fish: species and subspecies identification F. BARDAKCI* & D. 0. F. SKIBINSKI Molecular Biology Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, U.K. RandomAmplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was applied to three species of the tilapia genus Oreochromis and four subspecies of 0. niloticus. Thirteen random lO-mer primers were used to assay polymorphisms within and between populations. Different RAPD fragment patterns were observed for different species, although not always for different subspecies. Evidence is presented that RAPD markers might be useful for systematic investigation at the level of species and subspecies. Keywords:DNA,Oreochromis, polymorphism, RAPD, systematics, tilapia. fully to identify the subspecies of 0. niloticus (Capili, Introduction 1990; Seyoum & Kornfield, 1992) but little effort has Tilapiaare cultured extensively throughout the world, yet been devoted to the analysis of nuclear DNA for especially in Africa and the Far East. Most of the this purpose. important tilapiine species used in aquaculture are The development of random amplified polymorphic members of the Oreochromis genus, as many members DNA (RAPD) markers, generated by the polymerase of this taxon grow well under diverse culture condi- chain reaction (PCR), allows the examination of tions (Fryer & lIes, 1972; Pullin & Capili, 1989). genomic variation without prior knowledge of DNA Despite its commercial importance, resources have sequences (Williams et a!., 1990, 1993; Welsh & only recently been devoted to the development of McClelland, 1990; Hadrys, 1992). The number and improved strains of tilapia.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackchin Tilapia (Sarotherodon Melanotheron) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Blackchin Tilapia (Sarotherodon melanotheron) Ecological Risk Screening Summary Web Version – 10/01/2012 Photo: © U.S. Geological Survey From Nico and Neilson (2014). 1 Native Range and Nonindigenous Occurrences Native Range From Nico and Neilson (2014): “Tropical Africa. Brackish estuaries and lagoons from Senegal to Zaire (Trewavas 1983).” Nonindigenous Occurrences From Nico and Neilson (2014): “Established in Florida and Hawaii. Evidence indicates it is spreading rapidly in both fresh and salt water around island of Oahu, Hawaii (Devick 1991b).” “The first documented occurrence of this species in Florida was a specimen gillnetted by commercial fishermen in Hillsborough Bay near Tampa, Hillsborough County, in 1959 (Springer and Finucane 1963). Additional records for the western part of the state indicate that this species is established in brackish and freshwaters in eastern Tampa Bay and in adjoining drainages in Hillsborough County, ranging from the Alafia River south to Cockroach Bay. The species has been recorded from the Alafia River from its mouth up to Lithia Springs; from the Hillsborough River, Bullfrog Creek, the Palm River, and the Little Manatee River; and from various western drainage and irrigation ditches (Springer and Finucane 1963; Finucane and Rinckey 1967; Buntz Sarotherodon melanotheron Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Web Version – 10/01/2012 and Manooch 1969; Lachner et al. 1970; Courtenay et al. 1974; Courtenay and Hensley 1979; Courtenay and Kohler 1986; Lee et al. 1980 et seq.; Courtenay and Stauffer 1990; DNR collections; UF museum specimens). There are two records of this species from the west side of Tampa Bay, in Pinellas County: a collection from Lake Maggiore in St.
    [Show full text]
  • (Oreochromis Niloticus L) in Three Ethiopian
    OPEN ACCESS Freely available online Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal Research Article Differences in Phenotypic Characters of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L) in Three Ethiopian Rift Valley lakes; Screening Strains for Aquaculture 1* 2 3 Megerssa Endebu , Abebe Getahun , Misikire Tessema 1Department of Aquaculture, Batu Fishery and Other Aquatic Life Research Center, East Shoa, Ethiopia; 2Department of Zoological Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 3Department of Fisheries Biologist, Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia ABSTRACT Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) is indigenous species to Ethiopia and constitutes major proportion in the country’s fish production. In an attempt to select better performing strains for aquaculture development, tilapia populations from different Ethiopian rift valley lakes showed different growth performances in pond culture. Investigation of desired culture characteristics of target tilapia populations is required to improve their productivity in aquaculture system. The current study was made to investigate phenotypic characters of the tilapia populations in three geographically isolated Ethiopian rift valley lakes (Chamo, Koka and Ziway). A total of 450 adult tilapias of commercial catches were sampled from the three lakes and their phenotypic characters were analyzed during May 2018 to March 2019. Twenty six morphometric character indices, eight meristic counts, total length, standard length, total weight, length-weight relationship and Fulton’s condition factor were considered in the analysis. The results revealed significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in most of the morphometric character indices, meristic counts, mean length and weight and Fulton’s condition factor among the three tilapia populations. Chamo tilapia population were found to have highest mean values of total weight, total length and standard length while Koka population have highest mean value of Fulton’s condition factor and positive allometric growth as characters desired in aquaculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Health Quick Guide
    Fish Health Quick Guide Table of contents 1 Fish health ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Category 2 (Notifiable) ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Cestodes (Tape worms) ................................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Nematodes (Round worms) .......................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Ergasilus briani .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.4 Ergasilus sieboldi (Gill maggot) .................................................................................................... 2 2.5 Thorny headed worm (Acanthocephalans) ................................................................................... 2 2.6 Gyrodactylus .................................................................................................................................. 2 3 Common FW external Parasites. ...................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Costia (Icthyobodo necatrix). ........................................................................................................ 3 3.2 Trichodina. ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Identification of Fish Pathogens: What Is the Future?
    The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh 60(4), 2008, 213-229. 213 Detection and Identification of Fish Pathogens: What is the Future? A Review I. Frans1,2†, B. Lievens1,2*†, C. Heusdens1,2 and K.A. Willems1,2 1 Scientia Terrae Research Institute, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium 2 Research Group Process Microbial Ecology and Management, Department Microbial and Molecular Systems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Association, De Nayer Campus, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium, and Leuven Food Science and Nutrition Research Centre (LfoRCe), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Heverlee-Leuven, Belgium (Received 1.8.08, Accepted 20.8.08) Key words: biosecurity, diagnosis, DNA array, multiplexing, real-time PCR Abstract Fish diseases pose a universal threat to the ornamental fish industry, aquaculture, and public health. They can be caused by many organisms, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa. The lack of rapid, accurate, and reliable means of detecting and identifying fish pathogens is one of the main limitations in fish pathogen diagnosis and disease management and has triggered the search for alternative diagnostic techniques. In this regard, the advent of molecular biology, especially polymerase chain reaction (PCR), provides alternative means for detecting and iden- tifying fish pathogens. Many techniques have been developed, each requiring its own protocol, equipment, and expertise. A major challenge at the moment is the development of multiplex assays that allow accurate detection, identification, and quantification of multiple pathogens in a single assay, even if they belong to different superkingdoms. In this review, recent advances in molecular fish pathogen diagnosis are discussed with an emphasis on nucleic acid-based detec- tion and identification techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Introduced Tilapias on Native Biodiversity
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 15: 463–483 (2005) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.699 The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity GABRIELLE C. CANONICOa,*, ANGELA ARTHINGTONb, JEFFREY K. MCCRARYc,d and MICHELE L. THIEMEe a Sustainable Development and Conservation Biology Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA b Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Australia c University of Central America, Managua, Nicaragua d Conservation Management Institute, College of Natural Resources, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA e Conservation Science Program, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA ABSTRACT 1. The common name ‘tilapia’ refers to a group of tropical freshwater fish in the family Cichlidae (Oreochromis, Tilapia, and Sarotherodon spp.) that are indigenous to Africa and the southwestern Middle East. Since the 1930s, tilapias have been intentionally dispersed worldwide for the biological control of aquatic weeds and insects, as baitfish for certain capture fisheries, for aquaria, and as a food fish. They have most recently been promoted as an important source of protein that could provide food security for developing countries without the environmental problems associated with terrestrial agriculture. In addition, market demand for tilapia in developed countries such as the United States is growing rapidly. 2. Tilapias are well-suited to aquaculture because they are highly prolific and tolerant to a range of environmental conditions. They have come to be known as the ‘aquatic chicken’ because of their potential as an affordable, high-yield source of protein that can be easily raised in a range of environments } from subsistence or ‘backyard’ units to intensive fish hatcheries.
    [Show full text]