DOCSLIB.ORG

Application of the RAPD Technique in Tilapia Fish: Species and Subspecies Identification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Application of the RAPD Technique in Tilapia Fish: Species and Subspecies Identification Heredity 73(1994) 117—123 Received 25 November 1993 Genetical Society of Great Britain Application of the RAPD technique in tilapia fish: species and subspecies identification F. BARDAKCI* & D. 0. F. SKIBINSKI Molecular Biology Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, U.K. RandomAmplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was applied to three species of the tilapia genus Oreochromis and four subspecies of 0. niloticus. Thirteen random lO-mer primers were used to assay polymorphisms within and between populations. Different RAPD fragment patterns were observed for different species, although not always for different subspecies. Evidence is presented that RAPD markers might be useful for systematic investigation at the level of species and subspecies. Keywords:DNA,Oreochromis, polymorphism, RAPD, systematics, tilapia. fully to identify the subspecies of 0. niloticus (Capili, Introduction 1990; Seyoum & Kornfield, 1992) but little effort has Tilapiaare cultured extensively throughout the world, yet been devoted to the analysis of nuclear DNA for especially in Africa and the Far East. Most of the this purpose. important tilapiine species used in aquaculture are The development of random amplified polymorphic members of the Oreochromis genus, as many members DNA (RAPD) markers, generated by the polymerase of this taxon grow well under diverse culture condi- chain reaction (PCR), allows the examination of tions (Fryer & lIes, 1972; Pullin & Capili, 1989). genomic variation without prior knowledge of DNA Despite its commercial importance, resources have sequences (Williams et a!., 1990, 1993; Welsh & only recently been devoted to the development of McClelland, 1990; Hadrys, 1992). The number and improved strains of tilapia. Moreover few efforts have the size of amplified fragments depend on length and been made to assess the relative value of different sequence of short, single and arbitrary primers. methods for genetic characterization of tilapia germ- Priming sites are randomly distributed throughout a genome and polymorphisms in such sites result in plasm. The most recent classification of tilapiine species is differing amplification products, detected by the based on reproduction, development, feeding, struc- presence and absence of fragments. Such polymorph- tural characteristics and biogeography (Trewavas, isms are inherited in a Mendelian fashion and can be 1983). However, such characters are of limited value used as genetic markers. The method has been success- for identification purposes because they show con- fully used to detect variation between strains of siderable interpopulation variation and differences bacteria and rice (Welsh & McClelland, 1990), mice between species are small (Fryer & Iles, 1972; Abban, (Welsh et al., 1991), Gliricidia (Chalmers et al., 1992), 1988). Protein electrophoresis has been extensively closely related species of black Aspergilli (Megneg- used to discriminate species of tilapia (Kornfield at al., neau et al., 1993), and cocoa (Russell et a!., 1993) and 1979; McAndrew & Majumdar, 1983, 1984; Abban, between species of parasitic protozoa (Tibayrenc et a!., 1988; Sodsuk & McAndrew, 1991) and their hybrids 1993). (Macaranas et a!., 1986) but this technique could not This paper provides evidence that RAPD markers discriminate subspecies of 0. niloticus (Seyoum, 1989, can be used to discriminate between three widely culti- cited in Seyoum & Kornfield, 1992; Seyoum, 1990). vated species of tilapia and between several subspecies Mitochondrial DNA markers have been used success- of Oreochromis niloticus, probably the species with greatest commercial importance. An assessment is also made of the utility of RAPD analysis for systematic *Correspondence analysis of tilapia. 118 F. BARDAKCI & D. 0. F. SKIBINSKI Materials and methods some modifications. Amplification reactions were per- formed in 500 ifiM KC1, 100 mvi Tris (pH 9.0 at 25°C), 1 per cent Triton X-100, 2.5 mtvi MgCl, 100 MM each of Species and subspecies stud/ed dATP, dTTP, dGTP and dCTP (Pharmacia), 5 pmoles Thespecies and subspecies used in this study are heldof 10-base primer, 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase in aquaria at the University College of Swansea, Wales. (Promega Biotec.), and 20 ng of genomic DNA in a Their sources are given in Table 1. 0. niloticus final volume of 25 ML. The mixture was overlaid with (baobab) is a commercial strain of 0. niloticus with the same volume of mineral oil. DNA amplification possible hybrid ancestry. It is not recognized as a sub- was performed in a thermal cycler (Hybaid, U.K.). For species but is designated as one for convenience in this the first cycle, denaturation, annealing and extension study. were 94°C for 2 mm, 35°C for 1 mm and 72°C for 2 Their sources are given in Table 1. 0. niloticus mm, respectively. Denaturation time was decreased to (baobab) is a commercial strain of 0. niloticus with 30 s for the following 44 cycles. One negative control possible hybrid ancestry. It is not recognized as a sub- (absence of template DNA) was performed for each set species but is designated as one for convenience in this of amplifications. study. Approximately 10 ML of amplification products were separated on 5 per cent vertical nondenaturing DNA extraction polyacrylamide gels in TBE buffer (0.89 M Tris, 0.89 M boric acid and 0.11 M EDTA, pH 8.3). Gels were fixed DNAwas prepared from fin tissue following the with 10 per cent ethanol and 0.5 per cent acetic acid method described by Hillis & Moritz (1990) with some solution twice for 3 mm, stained with 0.1 per cent silver modifications. Approximately 50 mg of the caudal fin tissue was cut into small pieces and suspended in 500 jcL STE (0.1 M NaC1, 0.05 M Tris and 0.01 M EDTA, Table 2 Sequence and operon codes of the random primers pH 8). After adding 30 ,uL SDS (10 per cent) and 30 used to study variation in Oreochromis species ML proteinase K (10 mg mL 1), the mixture was Primer codes incubated at 50°C for 30 mm. DNA was purified by Sequence (5'to3') successive extraction with phenol, phenol:chloro- 0PA03 AGTCAGCCAC form:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and chloroform:isoamyl OPA 04 AATCGGGCTG alcohol (24:1), respectively. DNA was precipitated with OPA 05 AGGGGTCTTG ice-cold absolute ethanol and washed with 70 per cent OPA 07 GAAACGGGTG ethanol. The pellet was dried and resuspended in 150 OPA 08 GTGACGTAGG ,uL TE (10 mr'i Tris-HC1, 1 mtvi Na2EDTA.H20, pH OPA 10 GTGATCGCAG 7.2). OPA 12 TCGGCGATAG OPA 13 CAGCACCCAC OPA 17 GACCGCTTGT Amplificationconditions and electrophoresis OPA 19 CAAACGTCGG Aset of 13 decamer primers from Operon Technolo- OPB 08 GTCCACACGG OPC 02 GTGAGGCGTC gies was used in this study (Table 2). The amplification OPC 11 conditions were based on Williams et al. (1990) with AAAGCTGCGG Table 1 Species and subspecies used in this study and their source Species and subspecies Abbreviation Source Oreochromis aureus Aur Lake Manzala, Egypt Oreochromis mossambicus Mos Aquarist stock Oreochromis niloticus 0. n. vulcani (vulcani) Vul Lake Vulcani, Kenya 0. n. baringoensis (baringo) Bar Lake Baringo, Kenya 0. n. niloticus (manzala) Nil Lake Manzala, Egypt 0.n. (baobab) Bao Baobab Fish Farm, Kenya Common names of 0.niloticus subspecies are given in brackets. Nomenclature according to Trewavas (1983). RAPD ANALYSIS OF TILAPIA 119 nitratesolution for 10 mm, rinsed twice with distilled cnn0C') LL)r fiNfl LO0) W0) water, and then developed in an alkaline solution (1.5 040 (OLE) -cn (N per cent NaOH, 0.1 per cent NaBH4 and 0.15 per cent — r CH2O). A total of four individuals per species and sub- L11 B fl species (two males and two females) were analysed. Silver staining of polyacrylamide gels was found to be far superior to ethidium bromide staining of agarose 111 1I gels in terms of the number of fragments that could be III Ii resolved clearly. Analysis .3 TheRAPD patterns of individuals were compared within and between populations. Fragments were scored as 1 if present or 0 if absent. The index of similarity between individuals was calculated using the >Jflifl1 formula: :rm !IL np), where is the number of fragments shared by fill individuals x and y and n and n are the number of iirujj I fragments scored for each individual (Lynch, 1990). ) Within population similarity (S) is calculated as the Zfl:r.njI average of across all possible comparisons between individuals within a population. m. gjjp Between population similarity, corrected for within TffJJJ population similarity, is: a S= 1 + S— 0.5(S1+ S1), (00 Ofi cnN-C where S1 and S1 are the values of S for populations i (0 nfl LOLOO) 0) and j,respectivelyand S, is the average similarity N NO (ØLOfl N between randomly paired individuals from populations i and! (Lynch, 1990). It is possible for the value of S to I exceed 1. j H II S was also converted to a measure of genetic distance (D,1) using the equation: L-_HffrL1 D1 =— 1n[S/,J(S1S1)], (Lynch, 1991). D values were used to construct dendrograms using the unweighted pair-group method of analysis (UPOMA) (Sneath & Sokal, 1973). nfl The statistics can be calculated for each primer separately or for the combined data for all primers. F PP Results 'Tjp p. Allthe primers examined produced different RAPD fragment patterns (Fig. 1). The number of fragments generated per primer varied between six and 17. All =SWift primers gave species-specific RAPD patterns. Sub- z I Fig. I RAPD patterns from each of six populations using (a) up primer OPA 04 and (b) OPA 07. Samples (reading from the right hand lane): size markers; negative control (no template), t, ,fl 0. aureus, 0.mossambicus, 0. n. vulcani, 0. n. baringoensis, 0. n. niloticus, 0. n. (baobab). 120 F. BARDAKCI & D. 0. F. SKIBINSKI 0 species-specific patterns were obtained for some but CO 0 0 0 00.t- r) t rN 0 0O\ N - 0 'I00 C\ 0 not all primers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Effects of Introduced Tilapias on Native Biodiversity
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 15: 463–483 (2005) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.699 The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity GABRIELLE C. CANONICOa,*, ANGELA ARTHINGTONb, JEFFREY K. MCCRARYc,d and MICHELE L. THIEMEe a Sustainable Development and Conservation Biology Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA b Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Australia c University of Central America, Managua, Nicaragua d Conservation Management Institute, College of Natural Resources, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA e Conservation Science Program, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA ABSTRACT 1. The common name ‘tilapia’ refers to a group of tropical freshwater fish in the family Cichlidae (Oreochromis, Tilapia, and Sarotherodon spp.) that are indigenous to Africa and the southwestern Middle East. Since the 1930s, tilapias have been intentionally dispersed worldwide for the biological control of aquatic weeds and insects, as baitfish for certain capture fisheries, for aquaria, and as a food fish. They have most recently been promoted as an important source of protein that could provide food security for developing countries without the environmental problems associated with terrestrial agriculture. In addition, market demand for tilapia in developed countries such as the United States is growing rapidly. 2. Tilapias are well-suited to aquaculture because they are highly prolific and tolerant to a range of environmental conditions. They have come to be known as the ‘aquatic chicken’ because of their potential as an affordable, high-yield source of protein that can be easily raised in a range of environments } from subsistence or ‘backyard’ units to intensive fish hatcheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Revised Edna Assay for Tilapia (Oreochromis Mossambicus and Tilapia Mariae)
    Development of a revised eDNA assay for tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus and Tilapia mariae) Report by Richard C. Edmunds and Damien Burrows © James Cook University, 2019 Development of revised eDNA assay for tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus and Tilapia mariae) is licensed by James Cook University for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. For licence conditions see creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This report should be cited as: Edmunds, R.C. and Burrows, D. 2019. Development of revised eDNA assay for tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus and Tilapia mariae). Report 19/07, Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University, Townsville. Cover photographs: Front cover: Mozambique tilapia (photo: Ammit Jack/Shutterstock.com) Back cover: Oreochromis mossambicus and Tilapia mariae in captivity (photo: Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research). This report is available for download from the Northern Australia Environmental Resources (NAER) Hub website at nespnorthern.edu.au The Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP). The NESP NAER Hub is hosted by Charles Darwin University. ISBN 978-1-925800-31-9 June, 2019 Printed by Uniprint Contents Acronyms....................................................................................................................................iv Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Management of Two Cichlid Species in the Shatt Al-Arab River, Iraq
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Journal of Applied and Natural Science Journal of Applied and Natural Science 12(2): 261 - 269 (2020) Published online: June 12, 2020 ISSN : 0974-9411 (Print), 2231-5209 (Online) journals.ansfoundation.org Research Article Population dynamics and management of two cichlid species in the Shatt Al-Arab River, Iraq Abdul-Razak M. Mohamed* Department of Fisheries and Marine Resources, College of Agriculture, University of Bas- Article Info rah, Iraq https://doi.org/10.31018/ Abdullah N. Abood jans.v12i2.2293 Basrah Agriculture Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture, Iraq Received: May 14, 2020 Revised: June 6, 2020 *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted: June 10, 2020 Abstract Cichlids are invasive fish to Iraqi waters and became well established and prevailing in How to Cite different waters. Despite that, there is no stock assessment study conducted for these Mohamed A.R.M. and fish. So, growth, mortality, recruitment and yield-per-recruit of two cichlid‟s species; Abood, A.N. (2020). Popu- Coptodon zillii and Oreochromis aureus from the Shatt Al-Arab River, Iraq were evaluated lation dynamics and man- from November 2015 to October 2016 using the FiSAT software. A total of 5821C. zillii agement of two cichlid spe- (2.9-24.0 cm TL) and 1353 O. aureus (4.5-25.0 cm TL) were examined. Length-weight cies in the Shatt Al-Arab relationships were derived, indicating allometric growth for both species. The growth pa- River, Iraq. Journal of Ap- plied and Natural Science, rameters (L∞, K, Rn, to and Ǿ) obtained for C.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilapias and Other Cichlids Tilapias Et Autres Cichlidés Tilapias Y Otros
    62 Tilapias and other cichlids B-12 Tilapias et autres cichlidés Q = t Tilapias y otros cíclidos V = USD 1 000 Species, country Espèce, pays 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Especie, país t t t t t t t t t t Mozambique tilapia Tilapia du Mozambique Tilapia del Mozambique Oreochromis mossambicus 1,70(59)051,01 TLM Cambodia 273 F 345 F 300 F 200 F 100 F 100 F ... ... ... ... Dominican Rp 208 208 F 208 F ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Eq Guinea ... ... ... ... 0 0 0 - - - Grenada ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Guam 100 F 100 F 100 F 100 F 100 100 100 F 80 75 70 Guatemala 525 F 525 F ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Guyana 183 183 F 183 F 183 200 F 200 4 10 ... ... Indonesia 49 331 51 958 41 549 38 207 39 000 F 41 401 F 37 793 32 812 29 699 34 256 Malawi 30 15 62 83 100 100 100 75 862 916 Malaysia ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Mozambique 0 0 - - - - - - - - Solomon Is ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1 F 1 F 1 F South Africa 100 F 170 30 25 30 F 10 F ... ... 5 F 100 Swaziland ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 73 F 209 220 F Thailand 57 40 166 174 242 222 67 45 115 112 UK ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Species total Q 50 807 53 544 42 598 38 972 39 772 42 133 38 064 33 095 30 966 35 675 V 53 076 64 121 37 039 24 943 25 363 34 593 32 342 36 582 48 544 43 860 Nile tilapia Tilapia du Nil Tilapia del Nilo Oreochromis niloticus 1,70(59)051,02 TLN Barbados ..
    [Show full text]
  • Coptodon Zillii (Redbelly Tilapia) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Redbelly Tilapia (Coptodon zillii) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, May 2019 Revised, September 2019 Web Version, 11/18/2019 Photo: J. Hoover, Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. Public domain. Available: https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=485. (May 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Africa and Eurasia: South Morocco, Sahara, Niger-Benue system, rivers Senegal, Sassandra, Bandama, Boubo, Mé, Comoé, Bia, Ogun and Oshun, Volta system, Chad-Shari system [Teugels and Thys van den Audenaerde 1991], middle Congo River basin in the Ubangi, Uele [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964], Itimbiri, Aruwimi [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964; Decru 2015], Lindi- 1 Tshopo [Decru 2015] and Wagenia Falls [Moelants 2015] in Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lakes Albert [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964] and Turkana, Nile system and Jordan system [Teugels and Thys van den Audenaerde 1991].” Froese and Pauly (2019a) list the following countries as part of the native range of Coptodon zillii: Algeria, Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Israel, Ivory Coast, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, and Western Sahara. Status in the United States From NatureServe (2019): “Introduced and established in ponds and other waters in Maricopa County, Arizona; irrigation canals in Coachella, Imperial, and Palo Verde valleys, California; and headwater springs of San Antonio River, Bexar County, Texas; common (Page and Burr 1991). Established also in the Carolinas, Hawaii, and possibly in Florida and Nevada (Robins et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Cichlid (Family Cichlidae) Diversity in North Carolina
    Cichlid (Family Cichlidae) Diversity in North Carolina The Family Cichlidae, known collectively as cichlids, is a very diverse (about 1600 species) family of fishes indigenous to tropical and subtropical fresh and brackish waters of Mexico, Central and South America, the West Indies, Africa, the Middle East, and the Indian subcontinent. Only one species, the Ro Grande Cichlid, Herichthys cyanoguttatus, is native to the United States where it is found in Texas (Fuller et al. 1999). In the United States they are popular in the aquarium trade and in aquaculture ultimately for human consumption. Unwanted and/or overgrown aquarium fishes are often dumped illegally into local ponds, lakes, and waterways. More than 60 nonindigenous species have been found in waters of the United States (https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/SpeciesList.aspx?specimennumber=&group=Fishes&state=&family=Cich lidae&genus=&species=&comname=&status=0&YearFrom=&YearTo=&fmb=0&pathway=0&nativeexotic= 0%20&Sortby=1&size=50, accessed 03/03/2021). There are two nonindigenous species of cichlids in North Carolina with established, reproducing, and until recently, persistent populations: Redbelly Tilapia, Coptodon zilli, and Blue Tilapia, Oreochromis aureus. (Tracy et al. 2020). The two common names, Redbelly Tilapia and Blue Tilapia, are the American Fisheries Society-accepted common names (Page et al. 2013) and each species has a scientific (Latin) name (Appendix 1). Redbelly Tilapia can reach a length of 320 mm (12.5 inches) and Blue Tilapia a length of 370 mm (14.5 inches) (Page and Burr 2011). Redbelly Tilapia was originally stocked in Sutton Lake (Cape Fear basin), in Duke Energy’s Weatherspoon cooling pond near Lumberton (Lumber basin), and in PCS Phosphate Company’s ponds near Aurora (record not mapped; Tar basin) in attempts to manage aquatic macrophytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Exploitation at the Sea of Galilee (Israel) by Early Fisher
    FISH EXPLOITATION AT THE SEA OF GALILEE (ISRAEL) BY EARLY FISHER- HUNTER-GATHERERS (23,000 B.P.): ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMICAL AND CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Irit Zohar SUBMITTED TO THE SENATE OF TEL-AVIV UNIVERSITY November, 2003 FISH EXPLOITATION AT THE SEA OF GALILEE (ISRAEL) BY EARLY FISHER- HUNTER-GATHERERS (23,000 B.P.): ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMICAL AND CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Irit Zohar SUBMITTED TO THE SENATE OF TEL-AVIV UNIVERSITY November, 2003 This work was carried out under the supervision of Prof. Tamar Dayan and Prof. Israel Hershkovitz Copyright © 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Cultural setting 2 1.3 Environmental setting 4 1.4 Outline of research objectives 5 CHAPTER 2: FISH TAPHONOMY 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 Naturally deposited fish 7 2.3 Culturally deposited fish 9 CHAPTER 3: SITE SELECTION AND FIELD TECHNIQUES 11 3.1. The archaeological site of Ohalo-II 11 3.2. Fish natural accumulation 13 3.3 Ethnographic study of fish procurement methods 14 CHAPTER 4: METHODS 18 4.1 Recovery bias 18 4.2 Sampling bias 18 4.3 Identification of fish remains 19 4.4 Fish osteological characteristics 20 4.5 Quantification analysis 20 4.5.1 Taxonomic composition and diversity 21 4.5.2 Body part frequency 22 4.5.3 Survival index (SI) 22 4.5.4 Fragmentation index 23 4.5.5 WMI of fragmentation 24 4.5.6 Fish exploitation index 24 4.5.7 Bone modification 25 4.5.8 Bone spatial distribution 26 Page 4.5.9 Analytic calculations 26 4.6 Osteological measurements 29 4.6.1 Body mass estimation 29 4.6.2 Vertebrae diameter 31 CHAPTER 5: FISH REMAINS RECOVERED AT OHALO-II 32 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergence of New Tilapia Viruses
    Recurrent unexplained mortalities in warm water fish species; emergence of new Tilapia virus and epidemiological approach for surveillance 21st Annual Workshop of the National Reference Laboratories for Fish Diseases Nadav Davidovich, DVM, MVPH Israeli Veterinary Services and Animal Health Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Main topics of the presentation • Israeli Aquaculture • Tilapia farming • A novel RNA virus in Israel and in other countries • Lake Kinneret • Epidemiological survey • Summary History שימוש בשירותי המעבדה בניר farms דוד Edible fish )הערכה( 2017 מידת שימוש דגימות בשנה מספר משקים הערות כלל לא VS 0 35 משתמשים headquarters דגי מאכל במעבדות אחרות מעט 15 10 הרבה 150 5 קרבה גיאוגרפית סה"כ ארצי 900 50 מידת שימוש דגימות בשנה מספר משקים הערות דגי נוי לא משתמשים 0 37 Legend מעט 10 15 במקרים מיוחדים > 1,000 tons/year הרבה 0 0 500-1,000 tons/year סה"כ ארצי 150 52 < 500 tons/year Israeli Aquaculture Inland: • ~35 edible fish farms. • ~20 farms rearing Tilapia. • Total production 2016: 15,000 tons. • Main species: Tilapia, Common carp, Gray mullet. Israeli Aquaculture Mariculture: • ~10 farms. – Sea cages only in The Mediterranean. – From 2006, no Sea cages in The Red sea. • Total production 2016: 2,000 tons. • Main species: Gilthead seabream. Israeli Aquaculture Ornamental: • ~50 farms. Cold-water main species: Warm-water main species: Koi carp, Goldfish Guppy, Angelfish Tilapia farming in the world • Tilapia = common name for nearly 100 species; various Cichlids from 3 distinct genera: – Oreochromis – Sarotherodon – Tilapia • Dispersion in >135 countries and territories on all continents. • Main producers: China, Indonesia, Egypt, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Philippines, Brazil, Thailand, Colombia and Uganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum Specimens Answer Question of Historic Occurrence of Nile Tilapia Oreochromis Niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Florida (USA)
    BioInvasions Records (2017) Volume 6, Issue 4: 383–391 Open Access DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2017.6.4.14 © 2017 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2017 REABIC Research Article Museum specimens answer question of historic occurrence of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Florida (USA) Jeffrey E. Hill University of Florida/IFAS, SFRC Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, 1408 24th Street SE, Ruskin, FL 33570 USA *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 24 March 2017 / Accepted: 20 August 2017 / Published online: 11 September 2017 Handling editor: Charles W. Martin Abstract Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) is difficult to distinguish from the blue tilapia Oreochromis aureus (Steindachner, 1864), a species with which it readily hybridizes, and that has a well-documented invasion history from 1961 in Florida (USA). Extracting the differential histories of these two tilapia species is of particular interest for Florida invasive species regulation, but also is relevant for at least 32 countries where both species have been introduced. Museum specimens can provide key data to answer historical questions in invasion biology. Therefore I examined preserved specimens at the Florida Museum of Natural History (UF) (1) for misidentified Nile tilapia or the presence of Nile tilapia traits in blue tilapia specimens, (2) for misidentified Nile tilapia in other tilapia collections, and (3) to morphologically characterize Florida specimens of blue tilapia, Nile tilapia, and putative hybrids. The U.S. Geological Survey’s Nonindigenous Aquatic Species (USGS NAS) database was also examined for blue tilapia and Nile tilapia records. Blue tilapia lots dated to 1970, putative hybrids were present in blue tilapia lots since 1972 (10 counties), and Nile tilapia lots dated to 2007 (5 counties) in the UF collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Tilapia Production Techniques: a Mini-Review
    African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 12(36), pp. 5496-5502, 4 September, 2013 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.4119 ISSN 1684-5315 ©2013 Academic Journals Review Male tilapia production techniques: A mini-review Carlos Fuentes-Silva, Genaro M. Soto-Zarazúa*, Irineo Torres-Pacheco and Alejandro Flores-Rangel Biosystems Department, School of Engineering, Queretaro State University, C.U. Cerro de las Campanas S/N, C.P. 76010, Querétaro, México. Accepted 4 June, 2012 Tilapia culture has been growing over the past decades as an excellent source of high-quality protein. Some of the Tilapia´s advantages are the ability to breed and produce new generations rapidly, tolerate shallow and turbid waters, resist a high level of disease and be flexible for culture under many different farming systems. These characteristics are the main reasons for its commercial success. However, one of them contributes to the major drawback of pond culture: the high level of uncontrolled reproduction that may occur in grow-out ponds. Uncontrolled reproduction yields to stunted growth and unmar- ketable fish due to offspring competing with the initial stock for food, besides other problems like less dissolved oxygen, greater release of ammonia and feces, heterogeneous sizes and overpopulation stress. Monosex production has been preferred in order to deal with these issues. Males are preferred because they grow almost twice as fast as the females. This paper reviews monosex male production techniques and their results, comprising environment manipulation, hybridization, sex reversal and genetic manipulation. The choice of a particular technique would depend on the legislation of each country.
    [Show full text]
  • Salinity Tolerance of Juveniles of Four Varieties of Tilapia Robert Welsh Nugon Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2003 Salinity tolerance of juveniles of four varieties of tilapia Robert Welsh Nugon Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Recommended Citation Nugon, Robert Welsh, "Salinity tolerance of juveniles of four varieties of tilapia" (2003). LSU Master's Theses. 566. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/566 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SALINITY TOLERANCE OF JUVENILES OF FOUR VARIETIES OF TILAPIA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The School of Renewable Natural Resources by Robert Welsh Nugon, Jr. B.S., Millsaps College, 1997 May 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank Dr. C. Greg Lutz and Dr. Charles Weirich for their direction, mentorship, and patience demonstrated throughout my master’s program. I thank Dr. Robert P. Romaire and Dr. Terrence R. Tiersch for serving on my graduate committee and for guidance while finishing my master’s program. I also thank Dr. Luis A. Escobar for statistical expertise and Dr. John Hawke for advice and instruction. I thank Dr. Manuel Segovia and Dr. Allen Rutherford for friendship, advice, and support while I completed my degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Suborder LABROIDEI CICHLIDAE
    click for previous page Perciformes: Labroidei: Cichlidae 3333 Suborder LABROIDEI CICHLIDAE Cichlids by K.E. Carpenter iagnostic characters (for brackish-water tolerant species introduced into the area): Medium-sized (to Dabout 60 cm) fishes with variable body shape, from deep bodied and compressed to perch-like. Head with a single nostril on each side. A single dorsal fin with XIII to XIX spines and 10 to 16 soft rays; anal fin with III (except XII or XIII in Etroplus) spines and 7 to 12 soft rays; caudal fin typically rounded, truncate, or slightly emarginate (forked in Etroplus). Lateral line interrupted, with 26 to 40 (except 83 to 102 in Cichla ocellaris) scales. Colour: highly variable body colour from blue-grey, grey-green, olive green, brownish, blackish, silvery grey, to pale dusky, often with bars or blotches on sides; scales sometimes with individual dark markings; fins sometimes with spots, bars, and blotches, and sometimes bordered with a band of red or pink; males often exhibit distinct breeding coloration. a single dorsal fin with XIII-XIX spines and 10-16 soft rays lateral line interrupted a single nostril on each side of head anal fin with III (XII-XIII in Etroplus) spines and 7-12 soft rays Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Primarily fresh-water fishes that tolerate but generally do not breed and become established in brackish water; exceptions to this in the area are Etroplus suratensis which is a brackish-water species that can only tolerate fresh or marine water for short periods and Oreochromis mossambicus which is primarily fresh water but can breed and live in brackish water.
    [Show full text]