THE ROAD to TOBRUK CYRENAICA — a SECOND WORLD WAR PERSPECTIVE by AKHIL KADIDAL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE ROAD to TOBRUK CYRENAICA — a SECOND WORLD WAR PERSPECTIVE by AKHIL KADIDAL This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS MASTERSTROKE 1 TOBRUK — THE VERDUN OF THE DESERT 8 THE START OF THE RELIEF 17 THE SUNDAY OF THE DEAD 21 TOBRUK RELIEVED 23 EPILOGUE 26 ADDENDUM 31 UNITS OF THE TOBRUK GARRISON, 14 APRIL 1941 31 OPERATION CRUSADER 34 THE GERMAN DIVISIONS 38 BRIEF LIST OF SOURCES 41 THE ROAD TO TOBRUK CYRENAICA — A SECOND WORLD WAR PERSPECTIVE by AKHIL KADIDAL MASTERSTROKE hen 1941 dawned on Libya, it heralded a decisive moment in the WNorth African Campaign of the Second world War. British were optimistic. During the previous year, they had routed the poorly- led Italian army from the province of Cyrenaica and had made brisk MAGAZINE SIGNAL progress towards Tripolitania, in DESERT FOX The largely-empty desert Western Libya. But on February 8, playing field was ideally suited to General just as they reached the town of El Erwin Rommel’s (with red tabs) idea of mobile Aghelia, elements of the German warfare. It was also be conducive to his great army began to arrive by ship in the flanks of the British positions. country’s capital, Tripoli. General Erwin Rommel, the commander of the so-called Afrika Korps, arrived himself at Tripoli on the 12th and found a battleground unlike anything that had been encountered before. The flat, sweeping desert plains, broken only by the tall, green hills of the Jebel Akhdar on the rounded bulb of the country seemed to extend to the horizon forever. A narrow strip of fertile coastal land hugged the sea, supporting most of the towns and the population. In fact, the entire place had been described by the British as a “place fit only for war.”1 A main coastal road, AFRIKA KORPS named the Via Balbia, connected most of the towns and had BADGE witnessed the majority of military movements. Rommel, however, planned to break with tradition. He saw the barren desert as a giant thoroughfare and a weakness in the thin british lines. He planned to punch through the enemy front with a concentrated fist of tanks and motorized infantry and as the British reeled from the blow, drive back to Egypt. Little wonder then that Rommel’s English counterpart, General Sir Archibald Wavell, personally a brave man (he had lost an eye in the second battle of Ypres, and in 1 A title that the rebels in modern Libya would undoubtedly take exception to. 1 compensation had been given a Military Cross), faced a dilemma. Unlike the Italians, the Germans were highly motivated and had excellent arms - and worse - Wavell was actually losing troops. An important Royal Air Force (RAF) unit, No. 202 Group, accompanied by major army units were being sent across the Mediterranean to Greece to counter other Italian ambitions in the Balkans. All Wavell had remaining was one British armoured division, the infantry of the 9th Australian Division, a single RAF fighter squadron equipped with obsolete Gladiator biplanes and Hurricane fighters, and a bomber-reconnaissance squadron equipped with the hopelessly outdated and noisy Bristol Bombay. Wavell hoped for a respite, hoping that some of his units would be returned before the major fracas began. But then, on February 24, a small German reconnaissance battalion blundered into a British patrol and opened up, destroying three British scout cars. The Germans suffered no losses. Their reports to Rommel were optimistic; the British had only a thin covering force under Lt-General Philip Neame, VC, at El Aghelia. Rommel, who was still waiting for the greater part of his 15th Panzer Division to arrive, decided to attack with what he had. This was the sort of bravado that would make his reputation as a bold, swift commander, almost fearless in the execution of hastily- made plans. On March 24th, the German 5th Light Division with two Italian divisions for company, advanced out of Sirte and fell upon the British at El Aghelia. The orders to his troops were clear: captured capture Agedabia, Benghazi and secure Cyrenaica. Split into three columns, the Germans and Italians streamed east, leaving a great trail of dust in their wake. On the very first day, one column overran El Aghelia and then March 24 harried the escaping British garrison all the way to Agedabia which it captured on April The German 5th (Right) OBSOLETE Vickers VI Light Division tanks from the 1st Royal Tank attacks El Aghelia Regiment (RTR) in exercises with the 1/6th Rajputana Rifles of the 4th Indian Division in 1940. (Below) Cyrenaica as it was in 1941-42. IMPERIAL WAR MUSEUM E777 MUSEUM WAR IMPERIAL 2 COLONIAL TRIPOLI, CIRCA 1930 Italian M-13 German PzIIIG MAIN AXIS TANKS BUNDESARCHIV; MAP: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF MAP: BUNDESARCHIV; OFF THE BOAT German Panzer III tanks are unloaded at the Tripoli docks. Later, Axis supplies would have a German PzIVF-1 harder time running the British blockade at Malta. 3 CALM COMMANDER Much of the 9th Australian’s resolve at Tobruk came from the its analytical, level-headed leader, Major-General Leslie Morsehead. His resoluteness and adherence to discipline earned him the nickname “Ming the Merciless,” by his men and the Germans had nothing but the highest praise for his leadership. After Tobruk, Morsehead went on to more successes at El Alamein and the Pacific. AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL WAR AUSTRALIAN April 3 2 with over 800 prisoners. The British 3rd Armoured Brigade (the solitary brigade of Shattered the 2nd Armoured Division) attempted to intervene but its two regiments could muster remnants of the only 12 antiquated A-13 cruiser tanks, 20 captured “Eyetie” M-13’s (British slang for 3rd Armoured Italian) and 19 useless Vickers Mk VI tanks that looked as though they belonged in brigade World War I. retreat east The 5th German Division smashed through their defense and reached Benghazi on the night of April 3. For Wavell at headquarters, worse news followed. That morning, an RAF reconnaissance plane had spotted dust plumes on the horizon and reported that several enemy motorized columns were racing towards a large British oil depot at Msus. On hearing the news, the allied force guarding the depot had panicked and set the stores ablaze. The next morning, when the badly battered survivors of the 3rd Armoured Brigade arrived to refuel, they were met by thick palls of black smoke. In reality there had never been any danger. The force spotted on the previous day had been a British LRDG (Long Range Desert Group) unit on patrol, and a recovery section of the 3rd Armoured out looking for salvageable tanks. Starved for gasoline, the tankers of 3rd Armoured were forced to abandon most of their tanks and push on to Mechili, 80 miles away, on foot. The journey was punishing. Amid the sweltering desert heat, the men were attacked time and again by German Ju- 87 Stuka dive-bombers. The RAF seemed nonexistent, but heavy aerial engagements were taking place all along the line. On the afternoon of April 3, seven Hurricanes from the newly-arrived Australian 3 Squadron were flying a patrol when they encountered eight Stukas of II/StG2 and an equal number of Me110 heavy-fighters2 strafing British troops at Derna. Flight Lt. Alan Rawlinson and one section went after the Stukas while the other section took on the escorts. The Australians shot down one Me110 and two Stukas for no loss. The engagement had been remarkable efficient and fortunate for the harried RAF, 2 From 7./ZG26 led by the newly appointed Staffelkapitän, Hauptmann Georg Christl. 4 but the army did not share in that luck. Although many British ground units were able to withdraw into the Gazala plains, most fell into enemy hands soon after, including the remains of the 3rd Armoured Brigade which reached Derna on April 6 only to have the ignominious honor of being captured there. Rommel had achieved fantastic gains, but his offensive across central Cyrenaica had not been easy; the severe terrain had taken its toll on both man and machine. His knack for changing orders at the last moment caused numerous breakdowns among the motorized elements which were pushed to the limit over treacherous terrain with limited fuel. At times even his most hardened troops seemed to reach the breaking point. Some of the forward British 2nd units, ordered to make for Derna and the coast road were in such a desperate state that they Armoured Division were forced to leave behind a large number of vehicles, instead siphoning what little fuel remained so that a small force could reach their objectives. Rommel’s attention now turned to the oasis of Mechili, below the Jebel Akhdar mountains. With the assault on the oasis scheduled to begin in just a few days time the German supply column started back for Tripoli, 620 miles away, for fuel and stores. When it became apparent that they would not reach the front in time, the Luftwaffe attempted to fly in fuel to the 5th Panzer Regiment by landing on a nearby Wadi (an Arabic name for dry salt lake). RAF Hurricanes from the port-town of Tobruk and other airfields once again proved lucky and caught these massive Ju.52 transports on the ground. The result was a fiasco. Many of the Ju52’s were destroyed on the ground. Still, Rommel’s second column captured Msus on the April 7, and Mechili on the following day after a fierce three-day battle. They even overran the headquarters of the 2nd Armoured Division and captured its THE ALLIED PERIMETER as it appeared in this period German map. Translations: Fort: Fortified weapons location Kampstände: Anti-tank guns and Machine-gun post Jn Felsen: Reinforced trench Pakstände: Anti-tank group Panzerabwehrgraben: Anti-Tank ditch Drahtsperren: Concertina Wire with mines Minenfelder: Minefield 5 commander, Major-General Gambier-Perry who now joined some 1,700 prisoners in the bag, including 70 officers and a good deal of badly-needed supplies.
Recommended publications
  • The London Gazette
    tftnmb 37655 SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette Of TUESDAY, the i6th of JULY, 1946 by Registered as a newspaper WEDNESDAY, 17 JULY, 1946 The War Office,' July, 1946 OPERATIONS OF EAST AFRICA COMMAND, I2TH JULY, 1941 TO 8xH JANUARY, 1943 The following Despatch was submitted on area where General Nasi's forces were still March, 1943, to the Secretary of State for holding out, organised resistance in Ethiopia War by LIEUT.-GENERAL SIR WILLIAM had ceased prior to my predecessor's last PLATT, G.B.E., K.C.B., D.S.O., General despatch which dealt with operations up to the Officer Commanding in Chief, East Africa nth of July, 1941. Command. Although military opposition by .Italian On I5th September, 1941, East Africa Force forces had been almost eliminated, the main- as part of. Middle East Forces was abolished tenance of law and order over more than half and replaced by East Africa Command directly a million square miles of conquered territory under the War Office, covering the territories presented no small problem. The country was from Eritrea in the North to the Zambesi in armed from North to South and from East to the South. My predecessor Lieut.-General Sir West, with rifles, ammunition, grenades and Alan Cunningham, K.C.B., D.S.O., M.C., many automatics. More than 20,000 rifles, left East Africa on 29th August, 1941, to with over 20 million rounds of ammunition had assume command of the Eighth Army in been pumped into Ethiopia from the Sudan Middle East. Until my arrival on 5th Decem- alone to aid the Patriots in their revolt against ber, 1941, Major-General H.
    [Show full text]
  • 6Th South African Armoured Division
    6TH SOUTH AFRICAN ARMOURED DIVISION By J.C. von Winterbach, Scott Sutherland, Mike Bersiks, Rex Barret and Barry Cooper. Beginning The idea of a South African Armoured Division was born out of the chaos of the Western Desert Campaign, the Of- ficers in the 1st and 2nd South African Infantry Divisions felt the need for their own armour instead of depending on other Commonwealth Armoured Units. The formation of two strong Armoured Divisions was first discussed between Lt. Gen. G. E. Brink and rimeP Minister (Field Marshal) J.C. Smuts in April 1941. At that point time, South Africa was struggling to maintain the manpo- wer needed to sustain the 1st and 2nd Infantry Divisions in the field due to the political divisions in the Country. The 3rd South African Infantry Division was based in South Africa and provided the pool from which reinforcements were drawn to supplement the 1st and 2nd Infantry Divisions. A re-organisation committee met for the first time in May 1942 to discuss the armour option, it was decided to send three Infantry Battalions for armour training in August 1942, but the plan was rudely interrupted when Rommel launched his attack on the Gazala line in late May 1942. Nine days after the final El Alamein offensive the South African Divisions were pulling back to regroup. The plan was for the 1st Infantry Division that was withdrawn to Quassasin and that its 1st Brigade would return to South Africa to regroup with the 7th Infantry Brigade in Madagascar to form the 1st South African Armoured Division and the 1st Infantry Divisions 2nd and 3rd Brigades would remain in Egypt to form the 6th South African Armoured Division, which would replace the 2nd Infantry Division that had been captured at Tobruk in June 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • Inscribed 6 (2).Pdf
    Inscribed6 CONTENTS 1 1. AVIATION 33 2. MILITARY 59 3. NAVAL 67 4. ROYALTY, POLITICIANS, AND OTHER PUBLIC FIGURES 180 5. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 195 6. HIGH LATITUDES, INCLUDING THE POLES 206 7. MOUNTAINEERING 211 8. SPACE EXPLORATION 214 9. GENERAL TRAVEL SECTION 1. AVIATION including books from the libraries of Douglas Bader and “Laddie” Lucas. 1. [AITKEN (Group Captain Sir Max)]. LARIOS (Captain José, Duke of Lerma). Combat over Spain. Memoirs of a Nationalist Fighter Pilot 1936–1939. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition. 8vo., cloth, pictorial dust jacket. London, Neville Spearman. nd (1966). £80 A presentation copy, inscribed on the half title page ‘To Group Captain Sir Max AitkenDFC. DSO. Let us pray that the high ideals we fought for, with such fervent enthusiasm and sacrifice, may never be allowed to perish or be forgotten. With my warmest regards. Pepito Lerma. May 1968’. From the dust jacket: ‘“Combat over Spain” is one of the few first-hand accounts of the Spanish Civil War, and is the only one published in England to be written from the Nationalist point of view’. Lerma was a bomber and fighter pilot for the duration of the war, flying 278 missions. Aitken, the son of Lord Beaverbrook, joined the RAFVR in 1935, and flew Blenheims and Hurricanes, shooting down 14 enemy aircraft. Dust jacket just creased at the head and tail of the spine. A formidable Vic formation – Bader, Deere, Malan. 2. [BADER (Group Captain Douglas)]. DEERE (Group Captain Alan C.) DOWDING Air Chief Marshal, Lord), foreword. Nine Lives. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Brevity, Skorpion & Battleaxe
    DESERT WAR PART THREE: BREVITY, SKORPION & BATTLEAXE OPERATION BREVITY MAY 15 – 16 1941 Operation Sonnenblume had seen Rommel rapidly drive the distracted and over-stretched British and Commonwealth forces in Cyrenaica back across the Egyptian border. Although the battlefront now lay in the border area, the port city of Tobruk - 100 miles inside Libya - had resisted the Axis advance, and its substantial Australian and British garrison of around 27,000 troops constituted a significant threat to Rommel's lengthy supply chain. He therefore committed his main strength to besieging the city, leaving the front line only thinly held. Conceived by the Commander-in-Chief of the British Middle East Command, General Archibald Wavell, Operation Brevity was a limited Allied offensive conducted in mid-May 1941. Brevity was intended to be a rapid blow against weak Axis front-line forces in the Sollum - Capuzzo - Bardia area of the border between Egypt and Libya. Operation Brevity's main objectives were to gain territory from which to launch a further planned offensive toward the besieged Tobruk, and the depletion of German and Italian forces in the region. With limited battle-ready units to draw on in the wake of Rommel's recent successes, on May 15 Brigadier William Gott, with the 22nd Guards Brigade and elements of the 7th Armoured Division attacked in three columns. The Royal Air Force allocated all available fighters and a small force of bombers to the operation. The strategically important Halfaya Pass was taken against stiff Italian opposition. Reaching the top of the Halfaya Pass, the 22nd Guards Brigade came under heavy fire from an Italian Bersaglieri (Marksmen) infantry company, supported by anti-tank guns, under the command of Colonel Ugo Montemurro.
    [Show full text]
  • (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies A Stepping Stone to Success: Operation Battleaxe (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine Mike Bechthold On 16 February 1943 a meeting was held in Tripoli attended by senior American and British officers to discuss the various lessons learned during the Libyan campaign. The focus of the meeting was a presentation by General Bernard Montgomery. This "gospel according to Montgomery," as it was referred to by Air Chief Marshal Arthur Tedder, set out very clearly Monty's beliefs on how air power should be used to support the army.1 Among the tenets Montgomery articulated was his conviction of the importance of air power: "Any officer who aspires to hold high command in war must understand clearly certain principles regarding the use of air power." Montgomery also believed that flexibility was the greatest asset of air power. This allowed it to be applied as a "battle-winning factor of the first importance." As well, he fully endorsed the air force view of centralized control: "Nothing could be more fatal to successful results than to dissipate the air resource into small packets placed under the control of army formation commanders, with each packet working on its own plan. The soldier must not expect, or wish, to exercise direct command over air striking forces." Montgomery concluded his discussion by stating that it was of prime importance for the army and air 1 Arthur Tedder, With Prejudice: The war memoirs of Marshal of the Royal Air Force, Lord Tedder (London: Cassell, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine and Trans-Jordan History and Personnel
    2018 www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Author: Robert PALMER A CONCISE HISTORY OF: PALESTINE & TRANS-JORDAN (HISTORY AND PERSONNEL) A concise history of British Troops in Palestine & Trans-Jordan between 1930 and 1948, and the personnel who are known to have held key appointments in that command during that period. Copyright ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk (2018) 20 April 2018 [PALESTINE & TRANS-JORDAN HISTORY & PERSONNEL] A Concise History of Palestine & Trans-Jordan (History & Personnel) Version: V3_1 This edition dated: 20 April 2018 ISBN: Not yet allocated. All rights reserved. No part of the publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means including; electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, scanning without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Author: Robert PALMER, M.A. (copyright held by author) Published privately by: The Author – Publishing as: www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk © www.BritishMilitaryH istory.co.uk Page 1 20 April 2018 [PALESTINE & TRANS-JORDAN HISTORY & PERSONNEL] Palestine & Trans-Jordan The involvement of the United Kingdom in the politics of the Middle East extends over many years, but it was following the end of the Great War, or First World War, that British involvement increased. The success of the military campaigns in Gaza and Palestine, and in neighbouring Mesopotamia, gave the U.K. government military and political control of large areas of the former Ottoman Empire. Prior to the Great War, or First World War, Palestine and Trans-Jordan were part of the Ottoman Empire. During that war, in their determination to defeat the Central Powers, the U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiwi Unit Manual 2012
    RE-ENACTMENT MANUAL OF ELEMENTARY TRAINING 2nd N.Z.E.F. 1939-1945 N.Z. SECTION W.W.2 Historical Re-enactment Society 2O12 1 CONTENTS 2. INTRODUCTION 3. STANDING ORDERS 4. TRAINING SCHEDULE 6. STANDING ORDERS OF DRESS AND ARMS 7. UNIFORM AND INSIGNIA 8. SECTION UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS 9. SERVICE DRESS AND KHAKI DRILL 10. BATTLE DRESS UNIFORM 11. UNIFORMS AND HEADGEAR 12. UNIFORMS AND HEADGEAR 13. UNIFORMS OF NZ FORCES 14. UNIFORMS OF NZ FORCES (PACIFIC) 15. QUARTERMASTERS STORES 16. INSIGNIA 17. RANK 18. COLOUR INSIGNIA 19. FREYBURG AND THE DIVISION 20. COMMAND ORGANISATION 21. BRIGADE LAYOUT 22. COMMUNICATIONS PHOTO BY CLIFF TUCKEY/ KEVIN CARBERRY 23. THE EVOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TACTICS 24. THE EVOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TACTICS 25. SMALL UNIT TACTICS 26. BATTLE TECHNIQUES 27. CASUALTY EVACUATION 28. CASUALTY EVACUATION 29. MILITARY PROTOCOL 30. FOOT DRILL 31. ARMS DRILL 32. ARMS DRILL (BAYONETS) 33. S.M.L.E. RIFLE 34. BREN GUN, THOMPSON SMG, VICKERS 35. BAYONET, REVOLVERS, STEN GUN, BROWNING MMG 36. ORDANANCE AND SUPPORT WEAPONS 37. ARTILLERY 38. VEHICLES 39. BREN CARRIERS 40. 37 PAT WEBBING 41. 37 PAT WEBBING 42. EXTRA KIT 43. RATIONS AND SMALL PACK 44. NEW ZEALANDS WAR EFFORT- CHARTS AND TABLES 45. GETTING IT RIGHT –SOME COMMON CONFUSIONS 46. CARING FOR KIT 47. GLOSSARY 48. GLOSSARY 49. BIBLOGRAPHY 50. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 2 WORLD WAR II HISTORICAL RE-ENACTMENT SOCIETY NEW ZEALAND TRAINING & REFERENCE MANUAL AN INTRODUCTION. At first glance the New Zealand soldier in the Second World War resembled any Commonwealth soldier. From a distance of 20 yards they looked no different from Australian, Canadian, or British troops unless they happened to be wearing their 'lemon squeezers'.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 17/3 ,1 Miniature
    Vol 17/3 ,1 miniature The magazine of IPMS New South Wales Editorial Volume 17 No. 3 This is the third issue of 'IN miniature' (previously known as 'News and 'Views' for Volume 17 (2003). As always we have a mixed bag of articles and another large issue this time with a total of 11 editorial articles. IN miniature (previously News & Views) is the official I had intended to make this issue a 'Middle East Conflicts' special with a mix of articles from WWII, plus magazine of IPMS New several articles from this years Operation Falconer, the ADF's operations in Iraq 2003. Unfortunately 3 South Wales. weeks before we were to go to print, Ken Bowes emailed me to say that the OPSEC people at the RAAF had denied him permission to publish the material that he was preparing for us on the Hornets, Hercules Contributions are warmly and ASLAVs in Iraq. invited. All due care is taken for material offered, how- As Ken is a serving RAAF Officer he cannot publish anything without getting permission first. This is de- ever neither the editorial spite the fact that everything in his article is already in the public domain, mainly released by Defence them- staff nor IPMS New South selves thru their website. Unfortunately this all happened at the time that there was a Security 'flap' over the Wales accepts any respon- break-in and theft of the two servers at Sydney Airport. Hopefully when the panic all blows over we can pub- sibility. Acceptance of mate- lish the material at some time in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Rustin Military Collection
    Richard Rustin Military Books Donated 3 October 2009 THE RUSTIN MILITARY COLLECTION The Rustin Military Collection consists of nearly a thousand military books and periodicals collected by Richard E. Rustin during his lifetime. His wife, Ginette Rustin, donated this collection from his estate to the Archive Center and Genealogy Department, Indian River County Main Library, in October 2009 – April 2010. Richard E. Rustin passed away July, 2008. His wife considered him a genius regarding military history. He was a brilliant writer, a former reporter, manager and assistant chief of the New York news bureau. He edited coverage at the heart of the Wall Street Journal’s financial and economic news operations. He served in the U. S. Navy as an officer from 1956 to 1959. The focus of his collection centered on World War I and World War II. The collection also includes books on the Revolutionary War, Civil War, Mexican War, Korean War, and Viet Nam War, among others. Regimental histories and books of detailed campaigns, military science, military equipment and biography predominate. The library is very fortunate to have such a magnificent research collection containing many rare, out of print and hard to find volumes. It should be of great interest to anyone exploring military history. To date, the complete collection has been processed and is available to the public in the Genealogy Department. Use the online catalog at http://www.irclibrary.org or browse the list below. Title Author Publ Date 106th Cavalry Group in Europe J. P. Himmer Co. 1945 10th Royal Hussars in the Second World War 1939-45 Dawnay, D., etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Infantry Division (1941-43)]
    7 February 2017 [6 (70) INFANTRY DIVISION (1941-43)] th 6 Infantry Division (1) Headquarters, 6th Infantry Division & Employment Platoon 14th Infantry Brigade (2) Headquarters, 14th Infantry Brigade & Signal Section 1st Bn. The Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire Regiment 2nd Bn. The York and Lancaster Regiment 2nd Bn. The Black Watch (Royal Highland Regiment) 16th Infantry Brigade (3) Headquarters, 16th Infantry Brigade & Signal Section 2nd Bn. The Leicestershire Regiment 2nd Bn. The Queen’s Royal Regiment (West Surrey) 1st Bn. The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (Princess Louise’s) (4) 23rd Infantry Brigade (5) Headquarters, 23rd Infantry Brigade & Signal Section 4th (Westmorland) Bn. The Border Regiment 1st Bn. The Durham Light Infantry (6) Czechoslovak Infantry Battalion No 11 East (7) Divisional Troops 60th (North Midland) Field Regiment, Royal Artillery (8) (H.Q., 237th (Lincoln) & 238th (Grimsby) Field Batteries, Royal Artillery) 2nd Field Company, Royal Engineers 12th Field Company, Royal Engineers 54th Field Company, Royal Engineers 219th (1st London) Field Park Company, Royal Engineers 6th Divisional Signals, Royal Corps of Signals © www.BritishMilitaryH istory.co.uk Page 1 7 February 2017 [6 (70) INFANTRY DIVISION (1941-43)] Headquarters, 6th Infantry Divisional Royal Army Service Corps (9) 61st Company, Royal Army Service Corps 145th Company, Royal Army Service Corps 419th Company, Royal Army Service Corps Headquarters, 6th Infantry Divisional Royal Army Medical Corps (10) 173rd Field Ambulance, Royal Army Medical Corps 189th
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Chinese Labour Corps in Repairing and Maintaining British
    Published in Surveying and Built Environment, Vol. 21, Issue 12 (Dec. 2011), 12-20. (ISSN 1816-9554) Chinese Eyes on British Tanks: Historical Verification of a War Heritage Lee Ho Yin ______________________________________________ ABSTRACT This paper is about a British military tradition with a Chinese connection. It has taken the author several years of research to dispel the myth that has long shrouded the true origins of a regimental tradition of the 1st Royal Tank Regiment of the British Army. This tradition is a pair of eyes, known as the "Chinese Eyes," painted on the bows or turrets of British tanks from World War I to the present day. As such, the "Chinese Eyes" can be regarded as an intangible heritage expressed on the tangible hardware of the British Army. Using the research methodology for architectural conservation, the author attempts to rediscover obscured historical evidence, using it to chronologically reconstruct the events leading to the creation of this tradition. KEYWORDS Military heritage, historical research, interpretation, authenticity. Director, Architectural Conservation Programme (ACP), Faculty of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected] 1 INTRODUCTION: METHODOLOGY AND ORIGINS OF RESEARCH It is a little known fact that British tanks, produced in the thousands during World War I, were cared for by the skillful hands of the Chinese Labour Corps.1 Who would have thought that there is such a seemingly improbable connection between Chinese men and British war machines? More incredibly, who would have thought that a Chinese individual – an individual with an indirect link with Hong Kong – was responsible for creating a famous military tradition of British tanks – a pair of eyes, known as the "Chinese Eyes" that have been painted on British tanks since World War I.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of World War Two Memories
    World War Two memories Short accounts of the wartime experiences of individual Radley residents and memories of life on the home front in the village Compiled by Christine Wootton Published on the Club website in 2020 to mark the 75th Anniversary of the end of World War Two Party to celebrate VJ Day in August 1946 Victory over Japan Day (VJ Day) was on 8 August 1945. It's likely the party shown in the photograph above was held in Lower Radley in a field next to the railway line opposite the old village hall. Club member Rita Ford remembers a party held there with the little ones in fancy dress, including Winston Churchill and wife, a soldier and a Spitfire. The photograph fits this description. It's possible the party was one of a series held after 1945 until well into the 1950s to celebrate VE Day and similar events, and so the date of 1946 handwritten on the photograph may indeed be correct. www.radleyhistoryclub.org.uk ABOUT THE PROJECT These accounts prepared by Club member and past chairman, Christine Wootton, have two main sources: • recordings from Radley History Club’s extensive oral history collection • material acquired by Christine during research on other topics. Below Christine explains how the project came about. Some years ago Radley resident, Bill Small, gave a talk at the Radley Retirement Group about his time as a prisoner of war. He was captured in May 1940 at Dunkirk and the 80th anniversary reminded me that I had a transcript of his talk. I felt that it would be good to share his experiences with the wider community and this set me off thinking that it would be useful to record, in an easily accessible form, the wartime experiences of more Radley people.
    [Show full text]