DOCSLIB.ORG

Kelly Field Comprehensive Plan Working Paper #1 August 2020 DRAFT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kelly Field Comprehensive Plan Working Paper #1 August 2020 DRAFT Kelly Field Comprehensive Plan Working Paper #1 August 2020 DRAFT Prepared for Alamo Area Council of Governments 8700 Tesoro Drive, Suite 160 300 South Meridian Street San Antonio, Texas 78217 Indianapolis, Indiana 4662 VC-2019-2790-JLUS-KELLYFIELD-CHA-R1 www.chacompanies.com KELLY FIELD (SKF) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Kelly Field Executive Summary: National Airport, National Asset ................................................... I Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Project Description ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Objective ................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 Kelly Field Background ................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3.1 History .......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.2 Airport Organization and National Role ...................................................................... 1-4 1.3.3 Impact on National Defense ........................................................................................ 1-5 1.3.4 Annual Aircraft Operations .......................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.5 Surrounding Aviation Community ............................................................................... 1-7 1.3.6 Future Aviation Development...................................................................................... 1-7 Policy and Stakeholder Involvement .................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Policy and Stakeholder Groups .................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Joint Base San Antonio ................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 Port San Antonio .......................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.3 Alamo Area Council of Governments .......................................................................... 2-3 2.1.4 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization ....................................................... 2-3 2.1.5 City of San Antonio ...................................................................................................... 2-4 2.1.6 Bexar County ................................................................................................................ 2-5 2.1.7 Other Federal, State, and Local Entities ...................................................................... 2-5 2.2 Policy and Stakeholder Engagement ........................................................................... 2-6 2.2.1 Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Meeting ........................................................................ 2-6 2.2.2 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1 ................................................................. 2-7 2.2.3 Policy Advisory Committee Meeting #1....................................................................... 2-7 Authority and Planning Context ........................................................................... 3-1 3.1 U.S. Air Force ................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 JBSA-Lackland Air Installations Compatible Use Zones Study – October 2019 ........... 3-1 3.1.2 JBSA-Lackland Kelly Field District Area Development Plan – March 2019 .................. 3-5 3.1.3 JBSA-Lackland Port San Antonio Leaseback District Area Development Plan – September 2019 .......................................................................................................... 3-5 August 2020 DRAFT Kelly Field Executive Summary i KELLY FIELD (SKF) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3.1.4 JBSA-Lackland Installation Facilities Standards – March 2018 .................................... 3-6 3.1.5 JBSA Installation Complex Encroachment Management Action Plan, Volume I & II – February 2016 .............................................................................................................. 3-6 3.1.6 Air Force Instruction 32-1015 Integrated Installation Planning – July 2019 ............... 3-6 3.1.7 JBSA Bird/Wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH) Plan – June 2020 ............................ 3-6 3.2 Port San Antonio .......................................................................................................... 3-7 3.2.1 Kelly Field NPIAS Justification Report – September 2013 ........................................... 3-7 3.2.2 Kelly Field Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan – January 2019 ................................ 3-7 3.2.3 Kelly Field Airport GIS Study – September 2018 .......................................................... 3-9 3.2.4 Kelly Field Alternate Landing Surface Analysis, Part I – September 2017 ................... 3-9 3.2.5 Kelly Field Alternate Landing Surface Analysis, Part II – August 2018 ....................... 3-10 3.2.6 Kelly Field Air Traffic Control Tower Siting Study – February 2018 ........................... 3-11 3.2.7 Coordination of Airport Roles – January 2015 ........................................................... 3-11 3.2.8 Civil Aviation Terminal ............................................................................................... 3-12 3.2.9 Port San Antonio Design and Development Standards – October 2016 ................... 3-12 3.3 Joint Land Use Studies ............................................................................................... 3-13 3.3.1 JBSA-Lackland Joint Land Use Study – November 2011 ............................................ 3-13 3.4 U.S. Department of Defense ...................................................................................... 3-15 3.4.1 DOD Unified Facilities Criteria 3-260-01 Airfield and Heliport Planning and Design – February 2019 ............................................................................................................ 3-15 3.4.2 DOD Unified Facilities Criteria 2-100-01 Installation Master Planning – October 2019 3- 16 3.5 Federal Aviation Administration ................................................................................ 3-16 3.5.1 Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A Airport Design – February 2014 ............................ 3-16 3.6 Code of Federal Regulations ...................................................................................... 3-16 3.6.1 Code of Federal Regulations Title 14, Part 77 – July 2010 ........................................ 3-16 3.7 City of San Antonio .................................................................................................... 3-18 3.7.1 San Antonio Approved Master Development Plan, Port San Antonio – October 2008 3- 18 3.7.2 San Antonio Tomorrow Comprehensive Plan – August 2016 ................................... 3-19 3.7.3 San Antonio Tomorrow Multimodal Transportation Plan – August 2016 ................. 3-20 3.7.4 Unified Development Code, Zoning – January 2020 ................................................. 3-20 August 2020 DRAFT Kelly Field Executive Summary ii KELLY FIELD (SKF) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3.7.5 Unified Development Code, Development Standards – January 2020 ..................... 3-22 3.7.6 Unified Development Code, Historic Preservation and Urban Design – January 2020 . 3- 22 3.7.7 Major Thoroughfare Plan – September 1978 ............................................................ 3-23 3.7.8 Major Thoroughfare Plan Map – January 2020 ......................................................... 3-23 3.7.9 Transportation and Capital Improvements – Continuously Updated ....................... 3-23 3.7.10 Coordination of Airport Roles – January 2015 ........................................................... 3-24 3.8 State of Texas ............................................................................................................. 3-24 3.8.1 Texas Department of Transportation Airport Compatibility Guidelines – January 2003 ................................................................................................................................... 3-24 Kelly Field Existing Conditions .............................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Definition ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Exclusive Use Areas ...................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Jointly Used Flying Facilities ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Existing Airfield, Facilities, and Land Use ..................................................................... 4-3 4.2.1 Port San Antonio Exclusive Use Areas ......................................................................... 4-3 4.2.2 U.S. Air Force Exclusive Use Areas ............................................................................... 4-5 4.2.3 Jointly Used Flying Facilities ......................................................................................... 4-6 Kelly Field Planning and Design ............................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Airfield Design Standards ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Texas Army National Guard Education Benefits Handbook
    0 Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Texas Army National Guard Education Benefits Handbook 2200 W. 35th Street, Bldg. 15 (512) 782-5515 (M-F, 0800-1600) Austin Texas, 78763 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TXARNG Education Benefits Page 3 State Tuition Assistance Program Page 4 Hazlewood Act / Hazlewood Legacy Act Page 5 Federal Tuition Assistance Program Page 7 Credentialing Assistance Program Page 9 GI Bill Comparison Chart Page 11 Montgomery GI Bill – Selective Reserve, CH 1606 Page 12 Accessing Your NOBE Page 13 Montgomery GI Bill “Kicker” Page 14 Post 911 GI Bill, CH 33 Page 15 Harry W. Colmery: Forever GI Bill Page 17 Transfer of Education Benefits Page 19 How to Apply for GI Bill Benefits Page 21 Testing Services (DANTES) Page 23 Army Personnel Testing Page 24 Contacts & Resources Page 25 2 Return to Table of Contents TXARNG Education Benefits State Tuition Assistance (State TA) • Successfully complete basic training: Hazlewood Act/Hazlewood Legacy State Education • Serve 181 days of qualifying Active Duty Service Benefits • Receive a DD 214 at time of discharge Federal Tuition Assistance Program (FTA) • Successfully complete AIT or BOLC Army Credentialing Assistance Program (CA) Education • Successfully complete AIT or BOLC Benefits Montgomery GI Bill-Selected Reserve CH 1606 • Sign a 6 year contract with a Reserve Component VA • Successfully complete Initial Active Duty for Training Education (IADT) Benefits Montgomery GI Bill-Kicker • Contract-Specific Benefit (Signed w/enlistment or extension contract) Post 9/11
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Military Preparedness Commission Biennial Report Table of Contents
    Texas Military Preparedness Commission Biennial Report Table of Contents 2 Letter to the Governor 3 Executive Summary 4 The Defense Economy and Texas Highlights 6 The Commission Mission & Strategies Commissioners Ex-Officio Members Staff & Interns Funding Programs, Texas Military Value Revolving Loan Fund (TMVRLF) Funding Programs, Defense Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant (DEAAG) Texas Military Value Task Force (TMVTF) Governor’s Committee to Support the Military (GCSM) 16 Texas Commander’s Council, Recommendations 18 State Defense Legislation 21 Military Installations in Texas: Overview and Economic Impact 22 Economic Impact: Methodology and Disclaimers 24 Economic Impact Map 25 U.S. Air Force Installations Dyess Air Force Base Goodfellow Air Force Base Laughlin Air Force Base Sheppard Air Force Base 34 U.S. Army Installations & Army Futures Command Corpus Christi Army Depot Fort Bliss Fort Hood Red River Army Depot Army Futures Command 45 U.S. Navy Installations Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth Naval Air Station Kingsville 52 Joint Base San Antonio & Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base 57 Texas Military Forces Air National Guard Army National Guard Texas State Guard 62 Resources: Wind Energy and Military Operations 64 Resources: Maps Cover photo courtesy of U.S. Army/ By Capt. Roxana Thompson 1 Letter to the Governor Dear Governor Abbott: On behalf of the Texas Military Preparedness Commission (TMPC), I am pleased to submit to you the 2019-2020 TMPC Biennial Report. It has been an eventful two years since our last biennial report to you. The military continues to grow in their missions as Texas seeks opportunities to continue being the best home to military personnel in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 0511Bases.Pdf
    Guide to Air Force Installations Worldwide ■ 2011 USAF Almanac Active Duty Installations Abbreviations ABW/G Air Base Wing/Group This section includes Air Force owned and operated command: ACC. Major units/missions: 9th ACW/S Air Control Wing/Squadron facilities around the world. (It also lists the former RW (ACC), ISR and UAV operations; 548th ISRG AFB Air Force Base USAF bases now under other service leadership (AFISRA), DCGS; 940th Wing (AFRC), C2, ISR, AFDW Air Force District of Washington as joint bases.) It is not a complete list of units and UAV operations. History: opened October AFGLSC Air Force Global Logistics Support Center by base. Many USAF installations host numerous 1942 as Army’s Camp Beale. Named for Edward F. AFISRA Air Force ISR Agency tenants, not just other USAF units but DOD, joint, Beale, a former Navy officer who became a hero AFNWC Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center AFOSI Air Force Office of Special Investigations other service, and federal and civil entities. of the Mexican-American War and early devel- AFRICOM US Africa Command oper of California, as well as a senior appointee/ AFRL Air Force Research Laboratory Altus AFB, Okla. 73523-5000. Nearest city: Al- diplomat for four Presidents. Transferred to USAF AFS Air Force Station tus. Phone: 580-482-8100. Owning command: 1948. Designated AFB April 1951. AFWA Air Force Weather Agency AETC. Unit/mission: 97th AMW (AETC), training. AGOW Air Ground Operations Wing History: activated January 1943. Inactivated Brooks City-Base, Tex., 78235-5115. Nearest ALC Air Logistics Center May 1945. Reactivated August 1953. city: San Antonio.
    [Show full text]
  • Doolittle and Eaker Said He Was the Greatest Air Commander of All Time
    Doolittle and Eaker said he was the greatest air commander of all time. LeMayBy Walter J. Boyne here has never been anyone like T Gen. Curtis E. LeMay. Within the Air Force, he was extraordinarily successful at every level of com- mand, from squadron to the entire service. He was a brilliant pilot, preeminent navigator, and excel- lent bombardier, as well as a daring combat leader who always flew the toughest missions. A master of tactics and strategy, LeMay not only played key World War II roles in both Europe and the Pacific but also pushed Strategic Air Command to the pinnacle of great- ness and served as the architect of victory in the Cold War. He was the greatest air commander of all time, determined to win as quickly as possible with the minimum number of casualties. At the beginning of World War II, by dint of hard work and train- ing, he was able to mold troops and equipment into successful fighting units when there were inadequate resources with which to work. Under his leadership—and with support produced by his masterful relations with Congress—he gained such enor- During World War II, Gen. Curtis E. LeMay displayed masterful tactics and strategy that helped the US mous resources for Strategic Air prevail first in Europe and then in the Pacific. Even Command that American opponents Soviet officers and officials acknowledged LeMay’s were deterred. brilliant leadership and awarded him a military deco- “Tough” is always the word that ration (among items at right). springs to mind in any consideration of LeMay.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDING SURVEY Southwest System Support Office National Park Service P.O
    KELLY AIR FORCE BASE, CADET BARRACKS HABS No. TX-3396-AG (Kelly Air Force Base, Building 1676) 205 Gilmore Drive San Antonio Bexar County Texas PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDING SURVEY Southwest System Support Office National Park Service P.O. Box 728 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY KELLY AIR FORCE BASE, CADET BARRACKS HABS No. TX-3396-AG (Kelly Air Force Base, Building 1676) Location: 205 Gilmore Drive San Antonio Bexar County Texas Quadrangle BT~4 CoordtnateS'~-t4, -Northillg~ 56300rr,~0 (San Antonio, Texas, 7.S-minute USGS Quadrangle) Date of Construction: November 24, 1940 Present Owner: U.S. Air Force Kelly Air Force Base San Antonio, Texas 78241 Current Occupants: 76 SPTG/SUBMO; Visiting Officers Quarters (VOQ) (1-10) Original Owners: U.S. Army; U.S. Army Air Force (Kelly Field) Original Use: Cadet Barracks and Open Mess Current Use: VOQ and Officers' Club KELLY AIR FORCE BASE. CADET BARRACKS (Kelly Air Force Base, Building 1676) HABS No. TX-3396-AG (Page 2) Significance: Building 1676 was completed on November 24, 1940, and was first used as a Cadet Barracks to replace dilapidated World War I facilities. In 1943, when flight training ceased at Kelly Air Force Base (AFB), the building was redesignated as a Bachelor Officers' Quarters and Operations Hotel (OPS). The building was associated with activities of the San Antonio Air Service Command (1944-1946) and San Antonio Air Materiel Area (1946-1974) during a time when Kelly Field and depot were the largest such facilities in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Nation's Top Cybersecurity Program Leaps Forward with Infrastructure Investments to Advance Government–University–Industry
    Nation’s top cybersecurity program leaps forward with infrastructure investments to advance Government–University–Industry partnerships in the interest of national security Leveraging Government-University-Industry Partnerships Governmental agencies are calling for greater collaboration to address America’s national security infrastructure protection. To encourage this, business and local government partners will have direct access to the technical expertise, highly trained students, and specialized facilities that make UTSA a premier cybersecurity program. The National Security Collaboration Center (NSCC) is the result of strong partnerships with both the public and private sectors. Current federal cyber operations in San Antonio Both virtual resources and a physical account for more than 7,000 military and civilian jobs. location are vital for government, industry, and academic partners to collaborate, UT San Antonio is partnering with the following: conduct leading research, and to rapidly develop and prototype state of the art · U.S. Army Research Laboratory technologies and solutions to face the ever- · National Security Agency (NSA) Texas increasing level of threats to national security and global defense. · 24th Air Force Cyber Command · 25th Air Force By partnering with the National Security (specializing in intelligence, surveillance Collaboration Center, companies will have and reconnaissance agency) a competitive advantage for attracting customers, talent, and funding to grow their Department of Homeland Security · businesses. With its convenient location, · U.S. Secret Service partners will have expedient access to UTSA faculty, research, and students and · Federal Bureau of Investigation have the benefit of competitively priced land, lab, and office space leases. The NSCC will be a 80,000 sq. ft./$33M facility supporting Government-University-Industry (GUI) partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising Brochure
    Banners Advertising $ Price Listing JBSAtoday Magazine • $550 half page • $1,000 full page Posters • $1,200 inside front, inside back cover or back cover Digital Vinyl Banners: Displays • Cost based on size @ $8.50 per square foot, per month • Example: 4’ x 10’ banner equals 40 sq ft x $8.50 = $340 per month Primary POC for Advertising • Annual rate for advertising at one JBSA location- $1,620 (10% Direct discount) • Annual rate for advertising at all three JBSA locations- $4,320 (20% JBSA - Lackland: Advertising discount) Mr. Al Conyers Posters 22”w x 28”h: Vinyl banners, posters and table tents may be • Cost per location- $125 per poster, per month 210-925-1187 displayed at any of our high traffic facilities • Discounted monthly rate when advertised at all three locations- $120 [email protected] throughout JBSA. Those facilities include but are per poster per month • Annual rate for advertising at one JBSA location- $1,350 (10% not limited to three Bowling Centers, four 18-hole discount) championship Golf Courses, Fitness Centers, multiple • Annual rate for advertising at all three JBSA locations- $1,200 (20% Advertising Child and Youth Centers, a historic Theatre, three discount) Clubs, three Outdoor Recreation Centers, the Student Window Clings Activity Center on the METC campus at Fort Sam • Cost based on size @ $10.00 per square foot, per month Brochure • Example: 4’ x 10’ banner equals 40 sq ft x $8.50 = $340 per month Houston serving enlisted medical trainees and an • Annual rate for advertising at one JBSA location- $1,620 (10% Alternate POC’s Equestrian Center.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2019-2 10-21 June 2019 National Defense University
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2019-2 10-21 June 2019 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT NDU VICE PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Return of “Kellyusa,” but USAF Will Keep the Field As a Part Kelly Field of Lackland
    Most of the huge Texas base is now The Return of “KellyUSA,” but USAF will keep the field as a part Kelly Field of Lackland. EARLY 85 years after it first set up shop as a flight school for pilots in the Army’s Aviation NSection, Kelly Field, which grew into one of the nation’s oldest and most colorful military bases, has regained its original name and returned to its original mission of training airmen. On July 13, much of the sprawling Texas complex that has been Kelly Air Force Base officially becomes “KellyUSA,” a vast industrial park for aerospace firms, major corpora- tions, and San Antonio businesses. Major elements of the logistics op- erations that have been the base’s primary mission since World War II already have shifted to other instal- lations. Many of the Air Force fa- cilities are passing to civilian hands. However, under the conversion In its early days, Kelly Field truly was a field—an unpaved former cotton field. Here, cadets awaiting their turn to fly sit in a shelter watching the Jennys plans, the base’s airfield and flight being prepared for take off from the grass. operations will remain under the Air Force and become part of Lackland AFB, Tex., which itself was carved out of the Kelly complex during World War II. Now called Kelly Field Annex, it is home to the 149th Fighter Wing (ANG) and the 433rd Airlift Wing (AFRC). Joint-use arrangements will allow the businesses that move into By Bruce D. Callander KellyUSA to use the runways as well.
    [Show full text]
  • ARMY INSTALLATIONS (To Include Joint Bases)
    ARMY INSTALLATIONS (to include joint bases) TOTAL DIVIDEND ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD $267,371 ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT, AL $24,566 ARMY RESERVE CENTER IN SAIPAN, MARIANA ISLANDS $501,101 AS SAYLIHAY ARMY BASE, QATAR $101,328 BARRIGADA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, GUAM $208,844 BELLWOOD DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER, RICHMOND, VA $32,034 BISMARCK ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY, ND $5 CAMP ARIFJAN, KUWAIT $755,817 CAMP ASHLAND TRAINING SITE, ASHLAND, NE $15,453 CAMP ATTERBURY, EDINBURGH, IN $24,055 CAMP BEAUREGARD, PINEVILLE, LA $22,992 CAMP BONDSTEEL, BOSNIA $47,345 CAMP CARROLL LODGING, WAEGWAN, KOREA $8,187 CAMP GRAFORTON, DEVILS LAKE, ND $1,362 CAMP GRAYLING MICHIGAN NATIONAL GUARD, MI $11,829 CAMP GRUBER, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $6,649 CAMP GUERNSEY JOINT TRAINING CENTER, WY $378 CAMP HUMPHREYS LODGING, KOREA $8,269 CAMP JOHNSON COLCHESTER, VT $12,591 CAMP KEYS, AUGUSTA, ME $15,187 CAMP LINCOLN, SPRINGFIELD, IL $3,438 CAMP MABRY, AUSTIN, TX $39,740 CAMP MCCAIN TRAINING FACILITY, GRENADA, MS $5,805 CAMP PARKS RESERVE FORCES TRAINING, DUBLIN, CA $7,535 CAMP PERRY NATIONAL GUARD, PORT CLINTON, OH $3,117 CAMP RILEA ARMED FORCES TRAINING FACILITY, WARRENTON, OR $3,411 CAMP RIPLEY, LITTLE FALLS, MN $37,487 CAMP ROBERT, SAN MIGUEL, CA $3,903 CAMP ROWLAND, NIANTIC, CT ($5,010) CAMP SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA $994 CAMP SANTIAGO, SALINAS, PUERTO RICO $3,907,558 CAMP SHELBY JOINT FORCES TRAINING CENTER, MS $24,152 CAMP WALKER LODGING, KOREA $8,222 CAMP WALKER, DAEGU, KOREA $323 CAMP WILLIAMS, RIVERTON, UT $51,417 CAMP ZAMA, JAPAN $322,217 CARLISLE BARRACKS, PA $271,328 CHARLES
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 6, Issue 3 • Fall the Official Publication of The
    THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE WISCONSIN NATIONAL GUARD VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3 • FALL 7 2013 NGB Media Contest winner Wisconsin Guard members Fall 2014 join Guardsmen across U.S. Volume 6, Issue 3 on the cover Official Newsletter of the for Patriot Exercise 2014 Wisconsin Army and Air National Guard Master Sgt. Daniel Plantiko, an Airman with the 128th Security Forces Squadron, http://dma.wi.gov low-crawls through an obstacle as part of The Adjutant General: the 128th SFS Defender Challenge Aug. Maj. Gen. Don Dunbar 9. The event tests security forces mem- Deputy Adjutant General Army: bers’ endurance, career field knowledge, and team work. 128th Air Refueling Wing Brig. Gen. Mark Anderson 10 photo by Staff Sgt. Jenna V. Lenski Deputy Adjutant General Air: Runway renovations prompt Brig. Gen. Gary Ebben Deputy Adjutant General, Civil Support: 115th Fighter Wing to take 3 FROM TAG 4 DETACHMENT 52 SUPPORTING Brig. Gen. John McCoy THE MISSION IN AFGHANISTAN 5 REALIGNING Director of Public Affairs: its show on the road UNITS AND ARMORIES ACROSS THE STATE Maj. Paul Rickert 11 VITAL EXPERIENCE GAINED AT RED FLAG At Ease Editor: 12 COMMO SUPPORT FOR NORTHERN STRIKE Vaughn R. Larson 14 54th CST TRAINS CIVILIAN HAZ-MAT TEAMS Joint Force Headquarters Public Affairs 15 BUILDING FOBS AT FORT McCOY 16 1158th 112th Mobile Public Affairs Detachment 32 TRANSPORTATION HITS THE TANK TRAIL 17 115th FIGHTER WING BASE GETS A BOOST 32nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team Youth Camp provides MARKSMEN TEAM ON TARGET INSIDE THE Public Affairs 18 20 avenue for Guard kids
    [Show full text]